Professional Documents
Culture Documents
[Student Name]
[Course Name]
[Instructor Name]
[Date]
Unit I: Introduction to Decentralization
Centralization
It is a concept that denotes the concentration of authority in a particular position. It is making the
works done from the central authority. There is low or no involvement of the local institutions in
the service delivery options. The accountability, responsibility an resources capacity lies on the
central bodies whereas local people are only service receivers. It is applicable to the beginning
phase of any country with less diversity and service demand, no development in local leadership.
Strengths of Centralization:
1. Emphasis on top-down control leadership
2. Decision making strong
3. Organizational change shaped by the vision of the top leader
4. Fast and coordinated action which is able to respond quickly to major issues and changes.
5. Low risks of conflicts
6. Easier to implement uniform policies and practices for the whole country
7. Prevents the other parts of the country to become too much independent hence maintains
national integration
Drawbacks of Centralization:
1. Lack of authority down the hierarchy may reduce the local leaders motivation.
2. Does not maintain public participation
3. Public service misses flexibility and speed of decision making.
4. Does not address the local needs effectively
5. Does not maintain accountability and transparency
6. Service delivery will be slow due to the bureaucratic process
Decentralization
It is the establishment of local bodies outside the regular bureaucratic structure. It is the transfer
of authority and responsibility for public functions from the central government to subordinate or
quasi-independent local bodies or private sector. It refers to the restructuring of authority so that
there is a system of co-responsibility between the institutions of governance at the central, regional
and local levels.
Strengths of Decentralization:
I. Emphasis bottom up approach
II. Decision making will be democratic
III. Increasement in participation and accountability
IV. Decision making will be closer to the public
V. better able to address the local needs effectively
VI. good way of training and developing leaders
VII. organizational change due to the interactions
Drawbacks of the Decentralization:
1. Worsens the service delivery in the absence of effective controls and
oversight
2. deteriorates service quality due to over burden and out of capacity of local
government
3. local elites gain undue advantage by overcoming rules
4. creates new ethnic and religious rivalries
5. may lead to regional imbalances
Difference between Centralization and Decentralization:
Centralisation Decentralisation
1. It is the concentration of a. It is the dispersion of power, authority and resources
powers,authority and resources to the to the various level of local bodies.
center.
3. The communication flow is vertical. c. The communication flow is open and free.
4. It is ideal for small-sized countries. d. It is ideal for large and multi ethnic, multi culture
countries.
6.The burden of work goes only to the f. The burden of work is shared among many levels.
center.
7.The power of decision lies within the g. The power of decision lies with the multiple levels.
center.
It is considered to be the weakest form of decetralisation and used in unitary states. It is simply the
transfer of power and functions from the central organization to their respective field level
agencies which morally work for the central government and do not enjoy the autonomy. The
decentralization in the deconcentration form is the decision making discretionary and the lattitute
to the plans of the center. The transfer of authority includes the transfer of authority for specific
decision making, financial and management functions by the same jurisdictional authority of the
central government. It doesnot suffer from the organizational discontinuity. Examples: The power
and functions of CDO in every district.
Delegation
It refers to the transfer of government decision making and administrative authority or
responsibility for completing specified tasks to institutions or organisations that are either under
government indirect control or semi independent. It leads to the formation of semi-autonomous
body. In other words, it is a process of transferring authority or power to one or more persons who
act on behalf of others. It is usually done according to the set of certain rules/legal contract.
Examples: The representative member of Nepal in UNO, SAARC and other various international
platform.
Devolution
It refers to the creating, strengthening and transferring power and functions to the autonomous
lower level such as local units that are legally constituted as separate governance bodies. It
provides opportunities for the effective participation in the local level decision making process. It
helps to promote democracy at the grass root levels so that the local representation might gather
experience to be able tomorrow for the natural level progamming. Through devolution, central
government distributes certain functions or creates new units of government that are outside of its
control. In the devolution, local bodies are elected locally. For eg: Local level or local government.
Privatization
It is the process of transferring ownership of a business, enterprise, agency, public service or
property from the public sector to the private sector or private non-profit organization. It is to get
the job done through the private organizations. It includes:
a. allowing private enterprises to perform functions that had been previously monopolized by
government
b. contracting out the provision or management of public services to commercial
c. financing public sector through capital market and allowing private organization to participate
d. transferring responsibilities for providing services from the public to the private sector
Benefits:
a. development would be faster
b. innovative solutions
c. effective and time bound solutions
d. cost cutting
e. efficient delivery of many goods or services
Designing Decentralization:
Decentralization is a generic term which includes devolution, deconcnetration, delegation,
privatization, etc. The challenges to be resolved in designing and deciding decentralization
concerns on the many modes of decentralization to be applied. Central government around the
world are decentralizing fiscal, political and administrative responsibilities to lower level
governments and private sector. Many decentralization policies in the world are designed in a mix
of them all.
Challenges in Decentralization:
a. Sizable amount of mutual trust between the people and political as we as technical leadership.
b. Requirement of leadership that trusts people and the people that trust leadership especially in
the local and national levels.
c. Challenge of engineering consensus.
d. Challenges related to capacity
e. Challenges related to finance decentralized governance
Methods for designing decentralization :
a. Conductive political climate.
b. Favorable socio-psyschological attitude.
c. Adapting participatory approach in planning local governance and decentralization program.
d. Clarity of functional jurisdication.
e. Recognisation of autonomous status of LGIs
f. Capacity building of local bodies.
g. Conceptual clarity on local development and people's participation.
h. Political stability an continuity.
Five important conditions for successful decentralization:
1. The decentralization framework must link financing and fiscal authority to the service provision
responsibilities and functions of the local government.
2. The local community must be informed about the cost of services and service delivery options.
3. There must be mechanisms by which the community can express its preferences.
4. There must be a system of accountability.
5. The instruments of decentralization- the legal and institutional framework, the structure of
service delivery responsibilities and the intergovernmental fiscal system are designed to support
the political objectives.
Unit II. State Modernization and Need for decentralization
Federal : Our country adopted federalism in 2075 BS. Our country is divided into 7 Provinces with
One Federal Government. The agenda of federalism came during People Movement II. Basically,
federal means a country which has adopted federalism and is divided into states or provinces.
After the declaration of Constitution 2075, Nepal was declared as Federal country.
Democratic: Our country got democracy in 2007 BS from the autocratic Rana Regime. After
Democracy, people appointed their leaders and formed Interim Constitution 2007 which declared
Nepal as Democratic Country.
Republic: Our Country became republic in 2063 BS after the last Shah King Gyanendra resigned
from his throne and gave the throne to the people. Later the Interim Constitution of Nepal 2063
BS declared our Country Federal Democratic Republic.
Regional balance is an important condition for the harmonious and smooth development of a
country. It does not imply equal development of all regions of a country. Rather it indicates
utilisation of development potential of all areas as per its capacity so that the benefit of overall
economic growth is shared by the inhabitants of all the different regions of a country. Thus the
regional balance implies uniform distribution pattern of the planned investment among different
regions of a country. Alternatively, regional balance demands distribution of investment in such a
way so that the regional rates of growth in different parts of the country be equally attained,
eliminating the regional disparities prevailing in the country. Thus to attain regional balance, it is
quite important that the backward regions should try to attain higher rate of growth than that of
developed areas.
a. Both of them have two tiers of government one at center and one at state or province.
b. Both of them have written constitution which formally allocates legislative including
fiscal powers to the two orders of government ensuring autonomy for each other.
c. Both of them have a set of procedures and institutions for facilitating or conducting
relations between governments.
d. Both of them are based on the devolution of powers.
e. Both of them share open interaction between the Centers and Province or States.
f. Both of them can have variations in rules and regulations at Central and Provincial or
State levels.
g. Both of them promotes social inclusion and use of local resources.
Difference between Coming together and Holding together federalism
35. Any matter not enumerated in the Lists of Federal Powers, State Powers
and Local Level Powers or in the Concurrent List and any matter not
specified in this Constitution and in the Federal laws
List of Powers of State Governments:
1. State police administration and peace and order
2. Operation of banks and financial institutions in accordance with the
policies of Nepal Rastra Bank, cooperative institutions, foreign grants
and assistance with the consent of the Centre
3. Operation of Radio, F.M., television
4. House and land registration fee, motor vehicle tax, entertainment tax,
advertisement tax, tourism, agro-income tax, service charge, fee,
penalty
5. State civil service and other government services
6. State statistics
7. State level electricity, irrigation and water supply services, navigation
8. State universities, higher education, libraries, museums
9. Health services
10. Matters relating to the State Assembly, State Council of Ministers
11. Intra-State trade
12. State highways
13. State bureau of investigation
14. Physical management and other necessary matters of State
governmental offices
15. State Public Service Commission
16. Management of lands, land records
17. Exploration and management of mines
18. Protection and use of languages, scripts, cultures, fine arts and
religions
19. Use of forests and waters and management of environment within the
State
20. Agriculture and livestock development, factories, industrialization,
trade, business, transportation
21. Management of trusts (Guthi
List of Concurrent powers of Federal Government and State Government:
1. Civil and criminal procedure, evidence and oaths (legal recognition, public acts and
records, and judicial proceedings)
2. Supply, distribution, price control, quality and monitoring of essential goods and
services
3. Preventive detention for reasons connected with the security of the country, prison
and detention management, and maintenance of peace and order
4. Transfer of accused persons, detainees and prisoners from one State to
another State
5. Laws relating to family affairs (marriage, transfer of property, divorce,
persons on the verge of extinction, orphan, adoption, succession and
joint family)
6. Acquisition, requisitioning of property and creation of right in property
7. Contracts, cooperatives, partnership and agency related matters
8. Matters relating to bankruptcy and insolvency
9. Drugs and pesticides
10. Planning, family planning and population management
11. Social security and employment, trade unions, settlement of industrial
disputes, labour rights and disputes related matters
12. Legal profession, auditing, engineering, medicines, Ayurvedic
medicines, veterinary, Amchi and other professions
13. State boundary river, waterways, environment protection, biological
diversity
14. Matters related to means of communication
15. Industries and mines and physical infrastructures
16. Casino, lottery
17. Early preparedness for, rescue, relief and rehabilitation from, natural
and man made calamities
18. Tourism, water supply and sanitation
19. Motion pictures, cinema halls and sports
20. Insurance business operation and management
21. Poverty alleviation and industrialization
22. Scientific research, science and technology and human resources
development
23. Utilization of forests, mountains, forest conservation areas and waters
stretching in inter-State form
24. Land policies and laws relating thereto
25. Employment and unemployment aid
List of Power of Local Governments:
1. Town police
2. Cooperative institutions
3. Operation of F.M.
4. Local taxes (wealth tax, house rent tax, land and building registration fee, motor
vehicle tax), service charge, fee, tourism fee, advertisement tax, business tax, land tax
(land revenue), penalty, entertainment tax, land revenue collection
5. Management of the Local services
6. Collection of local statistics and records
7. Local level development plans and projects
8. Basic and secondary education
9. Basic health and sanitation
Local Governance:
Introduction:
It is the process of transferring functions, responsibilities, resources and authorities from central
to the local government. It is a more or less polycentric system in which a variety of actors are
engaged in local public decision making process. It is a process of inclusive decision making where
local governments and other relevant actors participate in decision making to agree and
implement essential tasks and basic services that affect the daily life. It is a process by which
authority, power, resources and accountability are transferred from central to local levels. It came
into fashion in the middle of 1990s.
Basic Elements of the Local Governance:
a. Participation
b. Equity
c. Transparency.
d. Accountability
e. Rule of law
f. Legitimacy
Main Actors of Local Governance:
a. State (Executive, Legislative and Judiciary ) creates the conductive political and legal
environment.
b. Local Government provides institutional and administrative framework for conducting
community affairs.
c. Private Sector provides the foundation for economic growth and development.
d. Civil Society facilitate social and political interaction.
Importance of Local Governance:
1. It protects the local interest concerning the livelihood of the community.
2. It promote good governance and build partnership with Civil Society, Private Sector and
Government units of the local level.
3. It helps to express the will of the local people.
4. It helps in developing local leadership.
5. It helps to enhance local techniques.
6. It helps to protect local culture.
7. It helps to utilize local resources.
Local Governance during COVID-19
Many local bodies were active during this crisis. The leaders of local government sealed their own
local area after they were hit by COVID-19. Some leader were engaged in distributing relief.
During this crisis, when Federal Government of Nepal is facing criticism from every sector of the
society, local bodies has helped the people. Some locally elected official took responsibilities of
migrant workers to send them home. Some officials were engaged in making quarantine.
Global Governance
Global Governance is a purposeful order that emerges from institutions, processes, norms, formal
agreements, and informal mechanisms that regulate action for a common good. Global governance
encompasses activity at the international, transnational, and regional levels, and refers to activities
in the public and private sectors that transcend national boundaries. In this conception of global
governance, cooperative action is based on rights and rules that are enforced through a
combination of financial and moral incentives. Methods of global governance
include harmonization of laws among states, international regimes, global policy issue networks,
and hybrid institutions that combine functions of state agencies and private sector organizations.
In its current conception, global governance implies democratic governance.
After COVID-19 hit the world, many global governance institutions like WHO, UN, OECD, EU,
etc became aware. They started the guidelines to fight against the COVID-19, some countries
like Taiwan, India shared their vaccines, masks with other countries, some provided economic
assistance to those countries who are badly hit with the COVID-19. In this time of COVID-19,
we can see the work of global governance institutions.
Globalization vs Localization
Globalization: It can be defined as the growing interdependence between all people of the
world. The increasing interdependence and interconnectedness of places globally. It is cross
border integration of economic, social and cultural activities.
Localization: It is a process and vision of local development through the use of local resources
and technology. It prioritize the local issues and resources than the international, regional and
national issues. Decentralization is the foundation of localization: mainly through devolution
and representation. The main objective of localization is to protecting and developing local
knowledge, skill and technology. It is both protection and promotion of local uniqueness.
Localization is a concept based on self-reliant local development.
Globalization Localization
2. It is global. b. It is local.
Too much of globalization can bring problems like discouragement in the production of local
goods, interference of global markets in the economy, pressure of global competition to the
local farmers and so on. Whereas, too much localization can cause problems like: limitations of
local goods only in the local market, lack of marketing of local goods in the international
market and so on.
1. Globalization and localization are not an alternative and competitor of each other. And, in
fact, they should complement each other by considering these points:
2. Human development
3. Regional balance
4. Equity and equality
5. Poverty alleviation
6. Protection and promotion of environment
7. Appropriate management of population
8. Utilization and promotion of local knowledge and skills
9. Social justice
10. Proper and effective utilization of natural resources.
11. Social integration
Federalism in Nepal:
Nepal is the 27th federal country. There is one Federal government and other 7 provincial
government.
The Constitution of Nepal 2072 (promulgated on 20 September 2015 and revised later) guaranteed
federalism Preamble,
– Part-5: Structure of State and Distribution of State Power
– Part -26 National Natural Resources and Fiscal Commission (article 250)
– Part -27: Other Commissions (article 252: National Women Commission; Article 255: National
Dalit Commission; Article 258: National Inclusion Commission; Article 261: Indigenous
Nationalities Commission; Article 262: Madhesi Commission; Article 263: Tharu Commission;
Article 264: Muslim Commission)
Criteria or basis used by the CA to federalise country
1. Identity
– ethnicity/community,
– language,
– culture, and
– historical continuity
2. Capability
– economic inter-dependence,
– economic capability,
– status of infrastructures and their viability,
– availability of natural resources and
– administrative accessibility.
Issue of Federalism in Nepal:
Sharing fiscal power and resources
This is one of the main potential areas of conflict in a federal state. If appropriate mechanisms for
the distribution of fiscal power are absent, it can create conflict later. Federal countries like
Australia, Spain, Malaysia and Germany are relatively centralised in their distribution of fiscal
powers (i.e., the central government has the main power to collect tax and other revenues),
compared to Switzerland, Brazil and Canada (which leaves the right to raise revenue mainly in the
hands of the federal units). If revenue means and expenditure needs for the various federal units
are mismatched, it can lead to tension and dysfunction. Anwar Shah argues: Vertical fiscal gaps
and revenue autonomy at sub-national orders of government remain areas of concern in federal
countries where the centralisation of taxation powers is greater than necessary to meet federal
expenditures, inclusive of its spending power. This leads to undue central influence and political
control over sub-national policies, and can even undermine bottom up accountability. This is a
concern at the state level in Australia, Germany, India, Mexico, Canada, Malaysia, Nigeria, Russia,
Spain and South Africa5. Hence, clearly defining fiscal relations, tax assignment and tax-based
revenue sharing mechanisms is crucial. Once the central government starts developing direct
relations with local government, the relevance of the federal units in terms of economic issues may
also be in question, despite their intact constitutional or political roles (like in Brazil, USA or
Canada).
Protection of minorities, marginalised and excluded groups
One of the major causes of the armed conflict in Nepal was the exploitation, discrimination,
marginalisation and social exclusion of certain communities/groups. The demand for a federal
governing system is largely to address this problem. If the new federal governing system protects
minorities, marginalised and excluded groups, then the possibility of conflict and tension related
to these issues will be reduced. Hence, the federal system adopted by Nepal must protect of rights
of individuals and groups. For every decision that the CA makes on the federal system the question
will have to be asked: what implications will it have for individuals, for Nepal, and for
communities/groups. What additional protective mechanisms are needed to really address these
concerns?
Jurisdictional clarity
Experiences of different federal countries (such as Australia) demonstrate that jurisdictional
tensions and conflicts are common when there is no clear definition of jurisdiction (distribution of
powers) between the national and sub-national governing units. To avoid such problems, the
constitution must clearly delineate between the jurisdictions of the various constitutional bodies,
as well as of the different states, the states and the centre, and the states and local governing units.
Dispute resolution mechanisms must also be in place to deal with any ambiguities
Social divergence
Language, race, religion, social structures and cultural traditions in a federal system must be
mutually and simultaneously reinforcing. If some factors or actors negatively highlight cleavages
associated with these structures, social divisions mount and cause tension and conflict within and
between federal units. In a multicultural federation like Nepal it is important to officially recognise
the languages of the main minority groups. Nepal needs to learn from the intensity of language
related resentment in Pakistan, Malaysia, India and Nigeria. At the same time, however,
institutional arrangements must be flexible enough to allow for a needs-based adjustment. The
experiences of Sudan, Sri Lanka and Spain show that political polarisation based on social
divergence can lead to separatist movements and that state reactions and counter-reactions can
make these demands stronger. There is a sad pattern of conflict escalation: Groups normally start
by asking for non-discrimination and political representation. If this is not fulfilled, they demand
self-rule. If, again, this demand is not fulfilled, then demands for federalism are voiced. If, again,
concerns are not addressed, as a next step, demands for independence may arise. Hence, it is
crucial that the governments of the federal units and the centre address these issues at the outset.
Institutional Arrangements
The nature, types and mandates of the institutional structures of federalism determine their degree
and ability to address differences, conflict and tension within the federation. How the institutions
accomplish tasks related to the electorate, bureaucracies, political parties, business sector and civil
society, and how they deal with political conflict determine whether or not conflicts that emerge
from social divergences and cleavages are resolved or escalate. Hence, the ability of institutions
and the design of processes to generate cooperative approaches to bring about consensus is crucial
to minimise conflict and promote selfrule and shared rule. Ensuring that the issues, concerns and
voices of the people within the federal units are accommodated in decisions and that all concerned
groups are represented in the legislature, civil service, executive and political party structures is
also important. If certain groups are not adequately represented in the institutions of the federal
units and central they feel alienated and may start separatist activities, as observed in East
Pakistan, which separated from Pakistan in 1971 to become Bangladesh. The experiences of India
and Nigeria demonstrate that if there are extreme differences between the federal units in terms of
wealth and the size of the population this can create tension and stress and led to demands for the
reorganisation of the boundaries of the federal units. If one federal unit dominates
demographically or economically, tension and conflict between federal units is unavoidable.
The naming process of the provinces and the question of where their headquarters should be
located has been an unsettled issue for some of the provinces.
There is very limited interactions between the social, behavioral and civil participation aspects of
federalism.
Legal challenges: for instance, the formulation of laws and policies without curtailing citizen’s
rights and lessening the contradictions and confusion around the formulations of laws and policies
on all government levels.
The implementation of Federal system is considered to be costly as Nepal is supposed to set up a
new Administrative as well as physical structure.
Tax burden and tax duplication is potential problem in which local governments and the federal
states may decide on different tax rates between the local municipalities and states and between
commodities and services within states.
In Nepal, all of the 25 political parties represented in the CA, except for one (Rastriya
Janamorcha), have accepted the federal political system. Only, Rastriya Janamorcha vehemently
opposes federalism. Their concerns and arguments are that federalism:
• Weakens sovereignty and increases the risk of disintegration of the nation
• Promotes communal disharmony and conflict
• When states are based on ethnicity, promotes hatred against each other
• Erodes national feeling and weakens national identity, while strengthening ethnic and
communal identity
• Is not the Nepali people's agenda, but is coming from the vested interests of India to keep Nepal
weak and instable
• Leads to the breakdown of national political parties into regional ones, which causes related
tensions
• Leads to discrimination of people within the nation as the rules of different states vary
• Results in ineffective delivery of government services
• Is operationally expensive, not sustainable for Nepal
• Brings unanticipated consequences and problems Some intellectuals argue that federalism is
mainly suitable for unifying separate small states, but is not appropriate to separate a unified state.
On the political front, Rastriya Janamorcha argues that federalism was introduced by a few elite
politicians under external influence who wrongly equated a centralised state with a unitary state.
They believe that decentralisation would have been sufficient to address concerns that other
politicians want to address through federalism. The opposition of Rastriya Janamorcha to
federalism has provided ample inputs for decision makers to ponder the challenges involved in
implementing federalism and the measures that need to be taken to address the concerns raised by
Rastriya Janamorcha. Proper debate on the benefits and limits of federalism can help to avoid
deficiencies in design and implementation.
Solutions for the issues and challenges regarding Federalism:
A critical review and reflection among stakeholders is necessary regarding the performance
of the federal structure. Such reviews should especially focus on responding to critical
questions such as what the new federal structure could deliver within a one year and a five
year time frame and how the roles and responsibilities of different actor should look like.
Expectation management in the context of the transitional governance structure is crucial.
High expectations of people and leader’s promises to meet those expectations have made it
difficult to establish the new system and find supporters. An honest and trustworthy
communication in the form of white paper statement, public hearings or media conferences
can play an important role to manage people’s expectations.
Political, economic, psychological and behavioral preparadeness is important to move from
an old to a new governance system. Since, Nepal had a unitary governance system for many
years leaders, citizens and bureaucrats are accustomed with the culture and practices of the
former system. Shifting towards the federal system requires the simultaneous federalisation
of mindsets, polices and implementation process.
Adequate knowledge and capacity development opportunities for elected local and
provincial government leaders and bureaucrats are of importance. Issues that should be
tackled to increase the effectiveness of the new system are development planning, fiscal
management, resource mobilization and evaluation of projects and programs.
Addressing the needs and concerns of socially deprived people should be another key focus
of the new federal structure.
Adequate provisions to create a wider civic space where citizens, institutions, opposition
parties and others can express their concerns through non-violent approaches should be
taken.
Because of the close link between corruption and poor governance, many international
organisations such as the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) are
preconditioning their aid to countries on the guarantee that the recipient countries
undertake good governance practices.
Equity (treating all citizens alike with empathy for the weaker sections)
Efficiency (speedy and effective delivery of service without harassment and using ICT
increasingly)
Citizens are thus at the core of good governance. Therefore, good governance and citizen centric
administration are inextricably linked.
Re-engineering processes
Adopting correct modern technology
Right to information
Citizens’ charters
Independent services’ evaluation
Grievance redressal mechanisms (Read the components of redressal mechanism in the
linked article.)
Active citizens’ participation – public-private partnerships
Lack of Accountability
1. A common reason usually cited for inefficiency in governance is the inability within the
system to hold the Civil Services accountable for their actions.
2. Seldom are disciplinary proceedings initiated against delinquent government servants and
imposition of penalties is even rarer.
3. It is primarily because at most levels authority is divorced from accountability leading to a
system of realistic and plausible alibis.
4. Cumbersome disciplinary procedures have added to the general apathy towards discipline
in Government. Moreover, the safeguards provided to civil servants, – which were well-
intentioned – have often been misused.
5. Another reason for the lack of accountability is that performance evaluation systems within
the government have not been effectively structured.
6. The complacency that the system breeds have resulted in employees adopting an apathetic
or lackadaisical attitude towards citizens and their grievances.
1. Inadequate awareness about their rights prevents citizens from holding erring government
servants to account.
2. Similarly, low levels of compliance of Rules by the citizens also act as an impediment to
good governance; When citizens do not adhere to their duties they infringe on the freedom
and rights of other citizens. Thus, awareness of rights and adherence to duties are two sides
of the same coin.
3. A vigilant citizenry, fully aware of its rights as well its duties, is perhaps the best way to
ensure that officials as well as other citizens, discharge their duties effectively and honestly.
1. There is a large body of laws in the country, each legislated with different objectives –
maintaining public order and safety, maintaining sanitation and hygiene, protecting rights
of citizens, giving special protection to the vulnerable sections etc.
2. Effective implementation of these laws creates an environment that would improve the
welfare of all citizens and at the same time, encourage each citizen to contribute his best
towards the development of society.
3. On the other hand, weak implementation can cause a great deal of hardship to citizens and
even erode the faith of the citizenry in the government machinery.
Red Tapism
1. Bureaucracies the world over are expected to adhere to rules and procedures which are, of
course, important for good governance. However, at times, these rules and procedures are
ab-initio ill-conceived and cumbersome and, therefore, do not serve their purpose.
2. Also, government servants sometimes become overly preoccupied with rules and
procedures and view these as an end in themselves. Prime Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh
while emphasizing procedural reforms, stated:
1. Governance functions with the Governance. Overview support of various institutions such
as the legislature, executive, and the judiciary, with a clear separation of power.
2. If these institutions succumb to illegal and unethical pressures, and they fail to perform
their designated functions, then the institutions get weakened.
3. This results in the failure of the process of governance and hampers development
initiatives.
Autonomous
Democratic Governance structure
Voluntary membership base
Non profit status
Focus on specific issues, functions or activities
Function of Civil society in Good Governance
a) Mobilize human energy and creativity to address specific interests, serve community
needs, undertake collective action and provide a common voice
b) Provide organized means of dialogue and services
c) Raise awareness
d) Receive and deliver services
e) Undertake development actions
f) Identify needs and provide feedbacks on policies
g) Strengthen democracy and provide new forms of interest and solidarity
h) Promote public participation develop democratic values like tolerance
i) "Watchdog" of holding governments and institutions to account
c. Role of Media in Good Governance
Medias are the communication outlets or tools used to store and deliver information or data.
The word "media" is derived from the word medium showing mode or carrier. It is the sword
arm and fourth pillar of democracy.
Role of Media in Good Governance:
i. It acts as watchdog to protect public interest against malpractice and create awareness.
ii. It inform people about the things that are happening.
iii. It helps to get justice for a lot of cases
iv. It holds the government accountable on the behalf of the people
v. It present the opinion of the people
vi. It promote efficiency, effectiveness and integrity.
d. Role of I/NGO in Good Governance
They are the non-profit entities independent of government influences.
Role of NGO:
I. It can acquire land, construct housing, provide infrastructure and operate and maintain
infrastructure such as wells or public toilets.
II. It supports innovation, demonstration and pilot projects.
III. It facilitates communication between government and people.
IV. It provides technical assistance and training.
V. It research, monitors and evaluates the projects.
VI. It advocates for the poor.
Self-Help Group(SHG)
Introduction:
It is a popular concept. It is almost two decade old. It help to increase economic development of
a country. It is now evolved as a movement.
Principle: It is based on the : group approach, mutual trust of small and manageable group,
spirit of thrift, peer group pressure in re-payment, skill training, capacity building and
empowerment
Characteristics:
1. It is a voluntary association.
2. It has a member of 15-20 people.
3. It has a collective goal.
4. It has a feeling of mutual help/ mutual support.
5. It is informal group.
6. It addresses the group's common problems.
Role of SHG
1) Most of its members are women as a result participation of women in the country's
development is increasing.
2) It helps to elevate the economic status of member families.
3) It helps to boost in women empowerment.
4) It can serve many different purposes depending on the situation and the need.
Ways to Promote Accountability/ Ways to facilitate Accountability:
For maintaining accountability following are the key elements that need to be considered:
1. Enforcing or strengthening of all laws, rules and regulations at local level.
2. Formulation and enforcement of code of conduct for various factors in local levels.
3. Enforcement of wider dissemination of information on local governance taking feedback
from the citizen.
4. Opening up suggestion box or complaint box to collect public governance and timely
redressal of them.
5. Ensuring timely public audit, social audit and public hearing.
6. Enforcing citizen charter and transparency of provisions.
7. Improving community participation in various level of governance
8. Developing capacity of citizens especially of marginalized and vulnerables and women.
9. Effective monitoring and evaluation system.
10. All decisions including the cost of concessions should be informed to people or posted in
internet.
Unit V. Good Governance and Decentralization
Deliberative Democracy
Introduction:
It is a thought in the political theory which claims that political decision should be the product
of the fair and reasonable discussions among the citizens. It is all about placing the people
closer to the affairs of government and decision making. It is a form of democracy in which
deliberation is central to decision making. It adopts the elements of both consensus decision
making and majority rule. Rather than thinking of political decisions as the aggregate of the
citizen's preferences, it claims that citizen should arrive at political decisions through reason
and the collection of competing arguments and viewpoints.
Strengths:
1) It is more easily able to incorporate scientific opinion and base policy on outputs of
ongoing research.
2) It tend to generate the ideal conditions of impartiality, rationality and knowledge of the
relevant facts.
3) It allows participants to deduce what is morally correct.
4) It tend to produce outcome which is better than other forms of democracy.
5) The debates arising from deliberative democracy are much more civil, collaborative and
evidence based than the other debates.
Inclusive Democracy:
Introduction:
It means participation of all the citizen in the policy formulation to bring all citizen of
country in the main stream of the politics. It is a form of social organization which re-
integrate society with economy, polity and nature. It is derived from a synthesis of two
major historical traditions- Classical Democratic and Socialist.
Elements of Inclusive Democracy:
There is four constituent element of inclusive democracy-political, democracy, economic
and ecological. The first three elements aims at the equal distribution of political, economic,
and social power.
Inclusive Democracy tools:
1) Participation a with control
2) Empowerment and Capacity Development
3) Proportional Representation
4) Reservation, Social protection, subsidies
5) Legal protection
6) Awareness program
7) Empower to weaker
8) Opportunity to excluded
9) Investment in Human Development and poverty alleviation
Constitutional bodies refer to those institutions that are created by the Constitution itself. They are
different from statutory bodies which are created by a law or statute. The Constitution of Nepal
2015 provides for several constitutional bodies and commissions which have their own value and
importance. Constitutional Bodies in Nepal are mentioned below:
Transparency, Efficiency and Effectiveness is one of the characteristics of the Good Governance.
Every government offices makes expenditure. Some of the offices make unusual expenditures
which are not according to the law and the main aim of the Auditor General is to audit and find out
these expenditures. Office of the Auditor General (OAGN) is a constitutional body and the
supreme audit institution of Nepal. It derives its mandate from Article 241 of the Constitution of
Nepal and Audit Act, 2075 (2019 A.D.). The Auditor General is empowered to undertake audits of
Office of the President and Vice-President, Supreme Court, Federal Parliament, Provincial
Assemblies, Provincial Governments, Constitutional bodies or their offices, courts, the Office of the
Attorney General and the Nepal Army, Nepal Police and Armed Police as well as of all other
government offices and courts with due consideration given to the regularity, economy, efficiency,
effectiveness and the propriety of government expenditures.
Role of National Human Rights Commission in Good Governance
Inclusion, Participation and Equity is one of the characteristics of the good governance. A nation
cannot achieve good governance when its citizens are treated unequally and are discriminated on
the basis of gender, caste and other factors and the Human Rights of the citizens are
compromised. In this case , NHRC plays as watchmen to guard the rights of the citizens.
The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) of Nepal is an independent and
autonomous constitutional body. It was established in the year 2000 as a statutory body under the
Human Rights Commission Act 1997 (2053 BS). The Interim Constitution of Nepal 2007 (2063
BS) made the NHRC a constitutional body. It has a separate sphere of responsibilities in the
constitutional legal system of the country. These responsibilities complement the responsibilities
of the normal machinery of the administration of Justice, the Supreme Court, the Office of the
Attorney General, the Commission for the Investigation of Abuse of Authority, and other existing
executive, quasi-judicial or judicial bodies of Nepal.
NHRC maintains good governance by performing following functions:
1. Respect, Protect and Promote human rights and ensure effective enforcement of human rights.
2. Inquire on petition or complaint sent to the Commission and investigate complaints about the
violations of human rights of an individual or group and make recommendation for action against
the perpetrators.
3. Recommend to the concerned authority to take departmental action against any official, who fails
to fulfill or perform his or her responsibility or duty or shows reluctance in preventing violations of
human rights.
4. Recommend to file a case in the court in accordance with law against any person or organization
who has violated human rights.
5. Coordinate and collaborate with the civil society in order to enhance awareness on human rights.
6. Carry out periodic reviews of the relevant laws relating to human rights and make
recommendation to the Government of Nepal for necessary improvements and amendments to
such laws.
7. Recommend Government of Nepal for the implementation of any international treaty or
agreement on human rights, to which Nepal is a party.
8. Publish, in accordance with law, the names of the officials, persons or bodies who have failed to
observe or implement any recommendations or directives made or given by the Commission in
relation to the violations of human rights, and record them as violators of human rights.
9. Governance through planning process and strategies:
Carrying out Anti-Corruption Allocate more rights and power to CDO for
Activities at Local Level controlling the corruption.
Maintain complaint box in every service providing
offices in cooperation with representatives of CSO.
Formulate the “complaint hearing unit” in every
service providing offices in cooperation with the
representative of CSO.
Formulate district level Corruption Prevention
Committee.
Increasing awareness on the Disseminate more material on the present RTI Act
Right to Information on various media.
Public Procurement Established as per the provision made in the new Public Procurement
Monitoring Office Act. Formulation and enforcement of public procurement laws,
under the Office of the policies, and guidelines. Monitoring of procurement processes and
Prime Minister and the contract management. Custodian of e-program and project
Council of Ministers government procurement (e-program and project GP) system. Provide
orientation and training on public procurement and e-program and
project GP.
Department for Control revenue leaks and misuse of foreign exchange. Established
Revenue Investigation under Anti Program and Project Money Laundering Act 2008 and
under the Office of the Prime Minister and the Council of Ministers.
Anti Program and Investigate and prosecute cases of antiprogram and project money
Project Money laundering and financial crimes. Nation’s financial manager, with
Laundering oversight of revenues and expenditures, budget preparation, and
Department responsibility for maintaining a stable economy.
Ministry of Finance Mobilizing and allocating resources, managing public investments and
expenditures and strengthening the productive capacity of public
enterprises. Oversees all government expenditures and consolidating
financial statements.
Nepal Rastra Bank Ensure monetary and financial stability in coordination with the
(Central Bank) Ministry of Finance. Committee chaired by the Minister of Finance
recommends appointment of the Governor. Main functions: issuing
currency, formulating and implementing appropriate monetary policy
and foreign exchange policy and systems, issuing banking licenses,
regulating commercial banks and financial institutions and serving as
their banker. Also functions as the government’s banker, adviser and
financial agent.
Ministry of Law and Drafts bills, ordinances and executive orders, reviews and updates
Justice existing laws. It provides legal opinions to the government and edits
notices for publication in the Nepal Gazette.
Ministry of Federal The General Administration arm is responsible for central and federal
Affairs and Local civil service personnel management and record keeping. Formulates,
Development implements and reviews plans, policies, and programs for
recruitment, placement, promotion, salary, allowance, disciplinary
action and retirement of civil servants. All ministries, departments,
commissions, and central level offices need its approval before taking
any action related to civil service management. The federal affairs arm
is responsible for coordination among all government tiers related to
federalism issues.
Resource Commitee Members from MOF, NPC and the Central Bank. Prepares budget
forecasts, sets the ceiling, and prepares budget formulation guidelines.
Sectoral Ministries Formulate sectoral policies and plans to implement decisions and
directives of the government through various central and field level
administrative mechanisms (e.g., departments). Monitor and evaluate
program implementation. Ministries prepare policies or programs and
evaluate them from social, economic, administrative, legal and
financial perspectives. Ministries coordinate with other agencies and
stakeholders and, following revisions submit a final policy or program
to the Cabinet for approval.
Departments Implement approved programs and policies, supervise and coordinate
field offices, develop technical skills, provide advice to the ministry
and ensure effective service delivery.
National Vigilance Established under the direct supervision and control of the Prime
Center Minister in accordance with the Control of Corruption Act 2002. Main
task is to promote integrity and good governance and prevent
corruption. Monitors incomes and individual property statements of
public servants (asset declaration). Undertakes technical audits of
projects to check compliance with laws, regulations and standards.
Constitutional Provisions
Commission for the Authority to investigate abuse of authority and unlawful gains by
Investigation of the public officials, including political appointees. It has 10 regional and
Abuse of Authority liaison field offices. Where CIAA does not have a presence (e.g.,
remote districts), the authority to address corruption is delegated to
Chief District Officers. If a person is found guilty, CIAA can file a case
in court or recommend departmental action by the relevant authority.
It also advises the government on policies and laws to curb
corruption. CIAA commissioners are appointed by the President on
the recommendation of the Constitutional Council for a period of six
years. The CIAA submits an annual report to the President, which is
discussed in the governance committee of Parliament.
Office of the Auditor Audit finances of all government offices, including the judiciary and
General the legislature. The Constitutional Council recommends the Auditor
General, who serves for a period of 6 years or until the retirement age
of 65. PAC discusses the Auditor General’s annual report on behalf of
Parliament.
Public Service The government is required to consult the Public Service Commission
Commission on all matters related to personnel management, especially the terms
and conditions of service and the principles to be followed in
recruitment, promotion, and departmental action against civil
servants. Its main task is to conduct examinations for selecting
candidates to fill vacant positions.
Legal Provisions:
Decentralization: It is the establishment of local bodies outside the regular bureaucratic structure.
It is the transfer of authority and responsibility for public functions from the central government
to subordinate or quasi-independent local bodies or private sector. It refers to the restructuring of
authority so that there is a system of co-responsibility between the institutions of governance at
the central, regional and local levels.