Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Development
A Short Handout
a. Physical/Natural/Geographical Environment
It consists of all components provided by nature and hence can be called as the natural environment.
It is also referred to as the physical environment as it pertains to the physical requirements of life.
These physical or geographic conditions are not dependent on the existence of humans. Sometimes,
humans have no control over the physical conditions of the environment.
It includes natural resources, the earth’s surface, mountains, plains, land, water, deserts, storms,
cyclones, volcanoes, oceans, climatic factors, and so on. It is also used to refer to biological situations
such as complexities associated with plants and animals.
b. Built/Man-Made Environment
This environment is used to refer to the one created by man in order to regulate and monitor certain
environmental conditions. Some address it as a social-cultural environment. It can further be divided
into two types of environments.
1. Inner Environment
2. Outer Environment
Ecology
Ecology is the study of organisms, the environment and how the organisms interact with each other
and their environment. It is studied at various levels, such as organism, population, community,
biosphere, and ecosystem.
SAGAR SUNUWAR 1
Ecologist’s primary goal is to improve their understanding of life processes, adaptations and habitats,
interactions and biodiversity of organisms.
Biotic components
Biotic components are living factors of an ecosystem. A few examples of biotic components include
bacteria, animals, birds, fungi, plants, etc.
Abiotic components
Abiotic components are non-living chemical and physical factors of an ecosystem. These components
could be acquired from the atmosphere, lithosphere, and hydrosphere. A few examples of abiotic
components include sunlight, soil, air, moisture minerals, and more.
Living organisms are grouped into biotic components, whereas non-living components like sunlight,
water, topography are listed under abiotic components.
Types of Ecology
Ecology can be classified into different types. The different types of ecology are given below:
i. Global Ecology
It deals with interactions among earth’s ecosystems, land, atmosphere, and oceans. It helps to
understand the large-scale interactions and their influence on the planet.
v. Population Ecology
It deals with factors that alter and impact the genetic composition and the size of the population of
organisms. Ecologists are interested in fluctuations in the size of a population, the growth of a
population and any other interactions with the population.
SAGAR SUNUWAR 2
In biology, a population can be defined as a set of individuals of the same species living in a given
place at a given time. Births and immigration are the main factors that increase the population and
death and emigration are the main factors that decrease the population.
Population ecology examines the population distribution and density. Population density is the
number of individuals in a given volume or area. This helps in determining whether a particular
species is in endanger or its number is to be controlled and resources to be replenished.
Importance of Ecology
The following reasons explain the importance of ecology:
Conservation of Environment
Ecology helps us to understand how our actions affect the environment. It shows the individuals the
extent of damage we cause to the environment.
Lack of understanding of ecology has led to the degradation of land and the environment. It has also
led to the extinction and endangerment of certain species. For eg., dinosaurs, white shark, mammoths,
etc. Thus, the study of the environment and organisms helps us to protect them from any damage and
danger.
Resource Allocation
With the knowledge of ecology, we are able to know which resources are necessary for the survival of
different organisms. Lack of ecological knowledge has led to scarcity and deprivation of these
resources, leading to competition.
Energy Conservation
All organisms require energy for their growth and development. Lack of ecological understanding
leads to the over-exploitation of energy resources such as light, nutrition, and radiation, leading to its
depletion.
Proper knowledge of ecological requirements prevents the unnecessary wastage of energy resources,
thereby, conserving energy for future purposes.
SAGAR SUNUWAR 3
Eco-Friendliness
Ecology encourages harmonious living within the species and the adoption of a lifestyle that protects
the ecology of life.
Ecosystem:
An ecosystem is a physically defined environment, made up of two inseparable components:
The biotope (abiotic): a particular physical environment with specific physical characteristics
such as the climate, temperature, humidity, concentration of nutrients or pH.
The biocenosis (biotic): a set of living organisms such as animals, plants or micro-organisms,
that are in constant interaction and are, therefore, in a situation of interdependence.
Types of Ecosystem
An ecosystem can be as small as an oasis in a desert, or as big as an ocean, spanning thousands of
miles. There are two types of ecosystem:
Terrestrial Ecosystem
Aquatic Ecosystem
Terrestrial Ecosystems
Terrestrial ecosystems are exclusively land-based ecosystems. There are different types of terrestrial
ecosystems distributed around various geological zones. They are as follows:
1. Forest Ecosystems
2. Grassland Ecosystems
3. Tundra Ecosystems
4. Desert Ecosystem
1. Forest Ecosystem
A forest ecosystem consists of several plants, animals and microorganisms that live in coordination
with the abiotic factors of the environment. Forests help in maintaining the temperature of the earth
and are the major carbon sink.
2. Grassland Ecosystem
In a grassland ecosystem, the vegetation is dominated by grasses and herbs. Temperate grasslands,
savanna grasslands are some of the examples of grassland ecosystems.
3. Tundra Ecosystem
Tundra ecosystems are devoid of trees and are found in cold climates or where rainfall is scarce.
These are covered with snow for most of the year. The ecosystem in the Arctic or mountain tops is
tundra type.
SAGAR SUNUWAR 4
4. Desert Ecosystem
Deserts are found throughout the world. These are regions with very little rainfall. The days are hot
and the nights are cold.
Aquatic Ecosystem
Aquatic ecosystems are ecosystems present in a body of water. These can be further divided into two
types, namely:
1. Freshwater Ecosystem
2. Marine Ecosystem
1. Freshwater Ecosystem
The freshwater ecosystem is an aquatic ecosystem that includes lakes, ponds, rivers, streams and
wetlands. These have no salt content in contrast with the marine ecosystem.
2. Marine Ecosystem
The marine ecosystem includes seas and oceans. These have a more substantial salt content and
greater biodiversity in comparison to the freshwater ecosystem.
Biotic Components
Abiotic Components
The biotic and abiotic components are interrelated in an ecosystem. It is an open system where the
energy and components can flow throughout the boundaries.
Structure of Ecosystem highlighting the biotic and abiotic factors
Biotic Components
Biotic components refer to all life in an ecosystem. Based on nutrition, biotic components can be
categorised into autotrophs, heterotrophs and saprotrophs (or decomposers).
Producers include all autotrophs such as plants. They are called autotrophs as they can
produce food through the process of photosynthesis. Consequently, all other organisms higher
up on the food chain rely on producers for food.
Consumers or heterotrophs are organisms that depend on other organisms for food.
Consumers are further classified into primary consumers, secondary consumers and tertiary
consumers.
o Primary consumers are always herbivores that they rely on producers for food.
o Secondary consumers depend on primary consumers for energy. They can either be a
carnivore or an omnivore.
SAGAR SUNUWAR 5
o Tertiary consumers are organisms that depend on secondary consumers for food.
Tertiary consumers can also be an omnivore.
Abiotic Components
Abiotic components are the non-living component of an ecosystem. It includes air, water, soil,
minerals, sunlight, temperature, nutrients, wind, altitude, turbidity, etc.
1. Food Chain
It is the sequence of transfers of matter and energy in the form of food from organism to organism.
The sun is the ultimate source of energy on earth. It provides the energy required for all plant life. The
plants utilise this energy for the process of photosynthesis, which is used to synthesise their food.
During this biological process, light energy is converted into chemical energy and is passed on through
successive levels. The flow of energy from a producer, to a consumer and eventually, to an apex
predator or a detritivore is called the food chain.
Dead and decaying matter, along with organic debris, is broken down into its constituents by
scavengers. The reducers then absorb these constituents. After gaining the energy, the reducers
liberate molecules to the environment, which can be utilised again by the producers.
2. Ecological Pyramids
An ecological pyramid is the graphical representation of the number, energy, and biomass of the
successive trophic levels of an ecosystem. Charles Elton was the first ecologist to describe the
ecological pyramid and its principals in 1927.
The biomass, number, and energy of organisms ranging from the producer level to the consumer level
are represented in the form of a pyramid; hence, it is known as the ecological pyramid.
The base of the ecological pyramid comprises the producers, followed by primary and secondary
consumers. The tertiary consumers hold the apex. In some food chains, the quaternary consumers are
at the very apex of the food chain.
The producers generally outnumber the primary consumers and similarly, the primary consumers
outnumber the secondary consumers. And lastly, apex predators also follow the same trend as the
other consumers; wherein, their numbers are considerably lower than the secondary consumers.
For example, Grasshoppers feed on crops such as cotton and wheat, which are plentiful. These
grasshoppers are then preyed upon by common mice, which are comparatively less in number. The
mice are preyed upon by snakes such as cobras. Snakes are ultimately preyed on by apex predators
such as the brown snake eagle.
In essence:
SAGAR SUNUWAR 6
Grasshopper →Mice→ Cobra → Brown Snake Eagle
3. Food Web
Food web is a network of interconnected food chains. It comprises all the food chains within a single
ecosystem. It helps in understanding that plants lay the foundation of all the food chains. In a marine
environment, phytoplankton forms the primary producer.
Services provided by Ecosystem:
Without ecosystem services, life on Earth as we know it wouldn’t exist. There are four main categories
of ecosystem services:
a. Provisioning services refer to the products secured by ecosystems. These include:
• Water
• Food (including cattle and seafood)
• Pharmaceuticals, biochemicals, and industrial products
• Energy (sunlight, hydropower, biomass)
b. Regulating services are the ecosystem services that allow the regulation of
ecosystem processes such as:
• Climate regulation (and carbon absorption and storage via the oceans, trees, soil)
• Waste decomposition (one of the most essential microbial process happening in soil)
• Crop pollination (performed by agents such as bees that contribute to the reproduction of
flowering plants)
• Water and air purification and regulation
• Control of pests and diseases
c. Supporting and habitat services refer to the ability of ecosystems to give habitat
for migratory species and to support the viability of gene-pools.This is possible
thanks to:
• Primary reproduction
• Nutrient and seed dispersal
d. Cultural services are the benefits ecosystem services bring to humans. Examples of
these are:
• Inspiration for intellectual (creativity), cultural (entertainment) and spiritual (why) purposes
– Remember how it feels good to seeing and hearing wild birds
– Animals, plants and even the funghi kingdom serve as inspiration in theaters, movies…
– Many people go to natural sites when they want to be alone or reflect about life
• Recreational experiences such as outdoors activities or ecotourism
• Scientific discovery and optimization/efficiency by following examples of the natural world
(biomimicry)
Functions of Ecosystem
The functions of the ecosystem are as follows:
1.
1. It regulates the essential ecological processes, supports life systems and renders stability.
2. It is also responsible for the cycling of nutrients between biotic and abiotic components.
3. It maintains a balance among the various trophic levels in the ecosystem.
4. It cycles the minerals through the biosphere.
5. The abiotic components help in the synthesis of organic components that involve the exchange
of energy.
So the functional units of an ecosystem or functional components that work together in an ecosystem are:
SAGAR SUNUWAR 7
Productivity – It refers to the rate of biomass production.
Energy flow – It is the sequential process through which energy flows from one trophic level to another.
The energy captured from the sun flows from producers to consumers and then to decomposers and
finally back to the environment.
Decomposition – It is the process of breakdown of dead organic material. The top-soil is the major site
for decomposition.
Nutrient cycling – In an ecosystem nutrients are consumed and recycled back in various forms for the
utilisation by various organisms.
Ecosystems are shaped in fundamental ways by the sun’s energy. But locally, many other factors
are crucial in determining local climate, availability of water and nutrients, and even the shape of
the land. All these determine the challenges and opportunities available to life in that area.
Once life is established in an area, it relates not only to the environment but also to the entire local
web of life. Things eat each other and are eaten. Things fight each other for resources and
cooperate for survival. Living things deplete and enrich the soil, are affected by and affect the local
weather, are shaped by local topography and change it.
Humans are part of this web of life. While we have a disproportionate impact on other living things
and our environment, we also are profoundly affected by them and we depend on their stability.
We need change to occur slowly enough so we, like everything else, can adapt successfully.
SAGAR SUNUWAR 8
Environmental Degradation
Environmental degradation is the deterioration of the environment through depletion of
resources such as air, water and soil; the destruction of ecosystems; habitat destruction;
the extinction of wildlife; and pollution. It is defined as any change or disturbance to the environment
perceived to be deleterious or undesirable. As indicated by the I=PAT equation, environmental impact
(I) or degradation is caused by the combination of an already very large and increasing human
population (P), continually increasing economic growth or per capita affluence (A), and the
application of resource-depleting and polluting technology (T).
Types of Environmental Degradation
a. Land and soil degradation: Degradation of soil quality from poor farming practices,
excessive use of fertilizers and pesticides, leakage from landfills etc.
b. Water degradation: Pollution of water from trash dumped in oceans, illegal dumping,
disposal of large amounts of industrial waste into nearby rivers or lakes etc.
c. Atmospheric degradation: This includes air degradation, particle pollution and
the depletion of the ozone layer.
SAGAR SUNUWAR 9
d. Several other kinds of pollution: Apart from land, water and atmospheric degradation,
many other kinds of pollution such as noise pollution, light pollution that are part of
environmental degradation.
Causes of Environmental Degradation
1. Land Disturbance
A more basic cause of environmental degradation is land damage. Numerous weedy plant species, for
example, garlic & mustard, are both foreign and obtrusive.
A rupture in the environmental surroundings provides for them a chance to start growing and
spreading. These plants can assume control over nature, eliminating the local greenery.
The result is a territory with a solitary predominant plant which doesn’t give satisfactory food assets
to all the environmental life. Thus the whole environment can be destroyed because of these invasive
species.
2. Pollution
Pollution, in whatever form, whether it is air, water, land or noise is harmful to the environment. Air
pollution pollutes the air that we breathe, which causes health issues.
Water pollution degrades the quality of water that we use for drinking purposes. Land
pollution results in the degradation of the earth’s surface as a result of human activities.
Noise pollution can cause irreparable damage to our ears when exposed to continuous large sounds
like honking of vehicles on a busy road or machines producing large noise in a factory or a mill.
3. Overpopulation
Rapid population growth puts strain on natural resources, which results in the degradation of our
environment. Mortality rate has gone down due to better medical facilities, which has resulted in an
increased lifespan.
More population simply means more demand for food, clothes and shelter. You need more space to
grow food and provide homes to millions of people. This results in deforestation, which is another
factor in environmental degradation.
4. Landfills
Landfills pollute the environment and destroy the beauty of the city. Landfills come within the city due
to the large amount of waste that gets generated by households, industries, factories and hospitals.
Landfills pose a great risk to the health of the environment and the people who live there. Landfills
produce a foul smell when burned and cause substantial environmental degradation.
5. Deforestation
Deforestation is the cutting down of trees to make way for more homes and industries. Rapid growth
in population and urban sprawl are two of the major causes of deforestation.
Apart from that, the use of forest land for agriculture, animal grazing, harvest for fuelwood and
logging are some of the other causes of deforestation. Deforestation contributes to global warming as
decreased forest size puts carbon back into the environment.
6. Natural Causes
Things like avalanches, quakes, tidal waves, storms, and wildfires can totally crush nearby animal and
plant groups to the point where they can no longer survive in those areas.
This can either come to fruition through physical demolition as the result of a specific disaster or by
the long term degradation of assets by the presentation of an obtrusive foreign species to the
environment. The latter frequently happens after tidal waves, when reptiles and bugs are washed
ashore.
Of course, humans aren’t totally to blame for this whole thing. Earth itself causes ecological issues, as
well. While environmental degradation is most normally connected with the things that people do, the
truth of the matter is that the environment is always changing. With or without the effect of human
exercises, a few biological systems degrade to the point where they can’t help the life that is supposed
to live there.
Effects of Environmental Degradation
1. Impact on Human Health
SAGAR SUNUWAR 10
Human health might be at the receiving end as a result of environmental degradation. Areas exposed
to toxic air pollutants can cause respiratory problems like pneumonia and asthma. Millions of people
are known to have died due to the indirect effects of air pollution.
2. Loss of Biodiversity
Biodiversity is important for maintaining the balance of the ecosystem in the form of combating
pollution, restoring nutrients, protecting water sources and stabilizing climate. Deforestation, global
warming, overpopulation and pollution are a few of the major causes of loss of biodiversity.
3. Ozone Layer Depletion
The ozone layer is responsible for protecting the earth from harmful ultraviolet rays. The presence of
chlorofluorocarbons, hydrochlorofluorocarbons in the atmosphere, is causing the ozone layer to
deplete. As it will deplete, it will emit harmful radiation back to the earth.
4. Loss For the Tourism Industry
The deterioration of the environment can be a huge setback for the tourism industry that relies on
tourists for their daily livelihood. Environmental damage in the form of loss of green cover, loss of
biodiversity, huge landfills, increased air and water pollution can be a big turn off for most of the
tourists.
5. Economic Impact
The huge cost that a country may have to borne due to environmental degradation can have a
significant economic impact in terms of restoration of green cover, cleaning up of landfills and
protection of endangered species. The economic impact can also be in terms of the loss of the tourism
industry.
Pollution
Pollution is the presence of a substance that tends to affect directly or indirectly the environment or
changes, degrades or spoils the environment. Pollution can be categorized into air pollution, water
pollution, land pollution and noise pollution. Pollution is the presence of a substance that tends to
affect directly or indirectly the environment or changes, degrades or spoils the environment. Pollution
can be categorized into following types:
1. Air Pollution
2. Water Pollution
3. Soil Pollution
4. Noise Pollution
Air Pollution
An undesirable change in the physical, chemical or biological characteristics of air is called pollution.
The substances which pollute the air called pollutants. Air pollution causes heart diseases, eye
problem, cancer etc. Apart from it, air carries the bacteria and virus from one place to another place
and transmits different diseases such as tuberculosis, polio, diphtheria and acute respiratory tract
infections.
SAGAR SUNUWAR 11
or built environment (for example, acid rain). Both human activity and natural processes can generate
air pollution.
Air pollution is a significant risk factor for a number of pollution-related diseases,
including respiratory infections, heart disease, COPD, stroke and lung cancer. The human health
effects of poor air quality are far reaching, but principally affect the body's respiratory system and the
cardiovascular system. Individual reactions to air pollutants depend on the type of pollutant a person
is exposed to, the degree of exposure, and the individual's health status and genetics. Indoor air
pollution and poor urban air quality are listed as two of the world's worst toxic pollution problems in
the 2008 Blacksmith Institute World's Worst Polluted Places report. Outdoor air pollution alone
causes 2.1 to 4.21 million deaths annually. Overall, air pollution causes the deaths of around 7 million
people worldwide each year, and is the world's largest single environmental health risk. The scope of
the air pollution crisis is enormous: 90% of the world's population breathes dirty air to some degree.
Although the health consequences are extensive, the way the problem is handled is often haphazard
The dust particles and harmful materials blown out by the wind gets mixed in the air and
pollutes it.
Natural gases that come from inside the earth's surface also pollutes the air.
Harmful gases released from different factories, industries and vehicles pollutes the air.
Gases that comes from burnt materials,rotten and decayed materials also pollutes the air.
Poisonous gases spreading out in the fields, rooms and houses are also the causes for air
pollution.
Stationary sources include smoke stacks of fossil fuel power stations (see for
example environmental impact of the coal industry), manufacturing facilities (factories)
and waste incinerators, as well as furnaces and other types of fuel-burning heating devices.
In developing and poor countries, traditional biomass burning is the major source of air
pollutants; traditional biomass includes wood, crop waste and dung.
Mobile sources include motor vehicles, trains (particularly diesel locomotives and DMUs),
marine vessels and aircraft.
Controlled burn practices in agriculture and forest management. Controlled or prescribed
burning is a technique sometimes used in forest management, farming, prairie restoration
or greenhouse gas abatement. Fire is a natural part of both forest and grassland ecology
and controlled fire can be a tool for foresters. Controlled burning stimulates the
germination of some desirable forest trees, thus renewing the forest.
There are also sources from processes other than combustion
SAGAR SUNUWAR 12
Waste deposition in landfills, which generate methane. Methane is highly flammable and
may form explosive mixtures with air. Methane is also an asphyxiant and may displace
oxygen in an enclosed space. Asphyxia or suffocation may result if the oxygen
concentration is reduced to below 19.5% by displacement.
Military resources, such as nuclear weapons, toxic gases, germ warfare and rocketry.
Fertilized farmland may be a major source of nitrogen oxides.
Natural source
Dust from natural sources, usually large areas of land with little vegetation or no vegetation
Methane, emitted by the digestion of food by animals, for example cattle
Radon gas from radioactive decay within the Earth's crust. Radon is a colorless, odorless,
naturally occurring, radioactive noble gas that is formed from the decay of radium. It is
considered to be a health hazard. Radon gas from natural sources can accumulate in
buildings, especially in confined areas such as the basement and it is the second most
frequent cause of lung cancer, after cigarette smoking.
Smoke and carbon monoxide from wildfires. During periods of active wildfires, smoke from
uncontrolled biomass combustion can make up almost 75% of all air pollution by
concentration.
Vegetation, in some regions, emits environmentally significant amounts of volatile organic
compounds (VOCs) on warmer days. These VOCs react with primary anthropogenic
pollutants—specifically, NOx, SO2, and anthropogenic organic carbon compounds — to
produce a seasonal haze of secondary pollutants. Black gum, poplar, oak and willow are
some examples of vegetation that can produce abundant VOCs. The VOC production from
these species result in ozone levels up to eight times higher than the low-impact tree
species.
Volcanic activity, which produces sulfur, chlorine, and ash particulates
The health effects caused by air pollution may include difficulty in breathing, wheezing,
coughing, asthma] and worsening of existing respiratory and cardiac conditions. These effects can result
in increased medication use, increased doctor or emergency department visits, more hospital admissions
and premature death. The human health effects of poor air quality are far reaching, but principally
affect the body's respiratory system and the cardiovascular system. Individual reactions to air pollutants
depend on the type of pollutant a person is exposed to, the degree of exposure, and the individual's health
status and genetics. The most common sources of air pollution include particulates, ozone, nitrogen
dioxide, and sulfur dioxide. Children aged less than five years that live in developing countries are the
most vulnerable population in terms of total deaths attributable to indoor and outdoor air pollution.
The World Health Organization estimated in 2014 that every year air pollution causes the premature
death of some 7 million people worldwide. Studies published in March 2019 indicated that the
number may be around 8.8 million.
SAGAR SUNUWAR 13
India has the highest death rate due to air pollution. India also has more deaths from asthma than any
other nation according to the World Health Organization. In December 2013 air pollution was
estimated to kill 500,000 people in China each year. There is a positive correlation
between pneumonia-related deaths and air pollution from motor vehicle emissions. In India in 2014,
it was reported that air pollution by black carbon and ground level ozone had reduced crop yields in
the most affected areas by almost half in 2011 when compared to 1980 levels
The air pollutants should be controlled as the point source by using electrostatic precipitator
or filter in the industries.
The use of cheap fuel with higher sulphur content should be avoided. Use of disulphurized coal
should be used.
Alternate sources of energy should be used in place of coal, wood, oil etc.
Population growth rate should be controlled.
Strip plantation should be done everywhere on the road side.
Strict check of car exhaust should be maintained.
Public awareness programme about the effects of pollution should be managed.
Various pollution control technologies and strategies are available to reduce air pollution. At its most
basic level, land-use planning is likely to involve zoning and transport infrastructure planning. In most
developed countries, land-use planning is an important part of social policy, ensuring that land is used
efficiently for the benefit of the wider economy and population, as well as to protect the environment.
Because a large share of air pollution is caused by combustion of fossil fuels such as coal and oil, the
reduction of these fuels can reduce air pollution drastically. Most effective is the switch to clean power
sources such as wind power, solar power, hydro power which don't cause air pollution. Efforts to
reduce pollution from mobile sources includes primary regulation (many developing countries have
permissive regulations), expanding regulation to new sources (such as cruise and transport ships,
farm equipment, and small gas-powered equipment such as string trimmers, chainsaws,
and snowmobiles), increased fuel efficiency (such as through the use of hybrid vehicles), conversion
to cleaner fuels or conversion to electric vehicles.
The following items are commonly used as pollution control devices in industry and transportation.
They can either destroy contaminants or remove them from an exhaust stream before it is emitted
into the atmosphere.
Particulate control
o Mechanical collectors (dust cyclones, multicyclones)
o Electrostatic precipitators An electrostatic precipitator (ESP), or electrostatic air
cleaner is a particulate collection device that removes particles from a flowing
gas (such as air), using the force of an induced electrostatic charge. Electrostatic
precipitators are highly efficient filtration devices that minimally impede the
flow of gases through the device, and can easily remove fine particulates such as
dust and smoke from the air stream.
SAGAR SUNUWAR 14
o Baghouses Designed to handle heavy dust loads, a dust collector consists of a
blower, dust filter, a filter-cleaning system, and a dust receptacle or dust
removal system (distinguished from air cleaners which utilize disposable filters
to remove the dust).
o Particulate scrubbers Wet scrubber is a form of pollution control technology.
The term describes a variety of devices that use pollutants from a furnace flue
gas or from other gas streams. In a wet scrubber, the polluted gas stream is
brought into contact with the scrubbing liquid, by spraying it with the liquid, by
forcing it through a pool of liquid, or by some other contact method, so as to
remove the pollutants.
Scrubbers
o Baffle spray scrubber
o Cyclonic spray scrubber
o Ejector venturi scrubber
o Mechanically aided scrubber
o Spray tower
o Wet scrubber
NOx control
o Low NOx burners
o Selective catalytic reduction (SCR)
o Selective non-catalytic reduction (SNCR)
o NOx scrubbers
o Exhaust gas recirculation
o Catalytic converter (also for VOC control)
VOC abatement
o Adsorption systems, using activated carbon, such as Fluidized Bed Concentrator
o Flares
o Thermal oxidizers
o Catalytic converters
o Biofilters
o Absorption (scrubbing)
o Cryogenic condensers
o Vapor recovery systems
Acid Gas/SO2 control
o Wet scrubbers
o Dry scrubbers
o Flue-gas desulfurization
Mercury control
o Sorbent Injection Technology
o Electro-Catalytic Oxidation (ECO)
o K-Fuel
Dioxin and furan control
Miscellaneous associated equipment
o Source capturing systems
o Continuous emissions monitoring systems (CEMS)
SAGAR SUNUWAR 15
Water Pollution
Degradation in the quality of water is called water pollution. Water covers over the 3/4th part of the
earth’s surface. It is a very important resource for people and the environment. Water pollution affects
drinking water, rivers, lakes and oceans all over the world. In many developing countries, it is usually
a leading cause of death, by people drinking from polluted water sources. Drainage and wastage from
industries, laboratory, hospitals, and homes are the main factors that causes water pollution.
Natural calamities like flood, landlides, soil erosion, heavy rain, etc. also pollute the water.
Leakage of agro-chemical from agricultural fields mixing with water resource can also cause
water pollution.
Throwing of dead bodies of animals in water resources also pollutes water.
Some human activities like washing of clothes and utensils near wells, ponds, streams, lakes,
etc. also pollutes the water sources.
Water pollution causes water-borne disease like diarrhoea, dysentery and cholera.
It also brings various skin allergy if taken the bath with polluted water.
Acid rain deteriorates cultural heritages.
It has the negative impact on plants.
Aquatic animals cannot survive in polluted water.
The dead bodies of animals and other wastes should not be thrown in water resources.
People should be made aware of the consequences of water pollution and they should be
encouraged to participate in the pollution control programme.
Production of domestic waste should be reduced as far as possible and it should not be thrown
in and around the water resources like ponds, rivers, lakes, streams etc.\
Water pollution due to soil erosion, landslides, and floods should be controlled by minimizing
the activities which cause these problems.
Land Pollution
Land pollution is the degradation of earth's surface. Land pollution makes the quality of soil low. It
directly affects the plants and indirectly to human beings. Human actions have also caused many large
areas of land to lose or reduce their capacity to support life forms and ecosystems. This is known as
land degradation.
SAGAR SUNUWAR 16
The following are the main causes of land pollution: -
Bio-degradable materials such as residue of plants, vegetables and other wastes of plants
should be used to make compost.
Broken machines, vehicles and other materialsshould be re-used.
Legal provision should be made on the management of solid wastes.
The solid waste and harmful chemicals from industries, hospitals and laboratories should be
processed and purified to some extent before discharging them to land and water resources.
The use of plastic bags and other materials made from plastic should be reducedand must be
re-used in some extent.
Noise Pollution
Noise is considered as environmental pollution, even though it is thought to have less damage to
humans than water, air or land pollution. Noise pollution also disturbs the ecosystem. Noise pollution
does not harm the environment as much as air pollution but if affects the health of the person
negatively. If someone has to stay in a very noisy condition for long time, this will affect the hearing
power (nervous system).
Sitting in a noisy place for long time damages our hearing capacity.
It causes imbalance in the production of hormones.
Frustration, depression, hypertension etc. may cause.
High-stress level and sleep disturbances may happen.
A loud noise may break the tympanic membrane of the ear and it leads to diseases.
Green belts should be created where there is the high level of noises.
The people who work in noisy places should use earplugs.
Vehicles which produces loud noise should not be operated near the cities.
High walls can be built around the factory which helps to check the transmission of noise.
Machine with silencer should be used as far as possible. Regular servicing of machie is also
helpful to check the sund pollution.
Things to remember
Pollution is the presence of a substance that tends to affect directly or indirectly the
environment or changes, degrades or spoils the environment.
Pollution can be categorized into air pollution, water pollution, land pollution and noise
pollution.
An undesirable change in the physical, chemical or biological characteristics of air is called
pollution.
The substances which pollute the air called pollutants.
Air pollution causes heart diseases, eye problem, cancer etc.
Land pollution is the degradation of earth's surface. Land pollution makes the quality of soil
low.
Noise pollution does not harm the environment as much as air pollution but if affects the
health of the person negatively.
Water Pollution:
Water pollution (or aquatic pollution) is the contamination of water bodies, usually as a result of
human activities. Water bodies include for example lakes, rivers, oceans, aquifers and groundwater.
SAGAR SUNUWAR 18
Water pollution results when contaminants are introduced into the natural environment. For
example, releasing inadequately treated wastewater into natural water bodies can lead
to degradation of aquatic ecosystems. In turn, this can lead to public health problems for people living
downstream. They may use the same polluted river water for drinking or bathing or irrigation. Water
pollution is the leading worldwide cause of death and disease, e.g. due to water-borne diseases.
Causes and Sources of Water Pollution:
The specific contaminants leading to pollution in water include a wide spectrum
of chemicals, pathogens, and physical changes such as elevated temperature and discoloration. While
many of the chemicals and substances that are regulated may be naturally occurring (calcium, sodium,
iron, manganese, etc.) the concentration usually determines what is a natural component of water and
what is a contaminant. High concentrations of naturally occurring substances can have negative
impacts on aquatic flora and fauna.
Oxygen-depleting substances may be natural materials such as plant matter (e.g. leaves and grass) as
well as man-made chemicals. Other natural and anthropogenic substances may
cause turbidity (cloudiness) which blocks light and disrupts plant growth, and clogs the gills of some
fish species.
Alteration of water's physical chemistry includes acidity (change in pH), electrical conductivity,
temperature, and eutrophication. Eutrophication is an increase in the concentration of chemical
nutrients in an ecosystem to an extent that increases the primary productivity of the ecosystem.
Depending on the degree of eutrophication, subsequent negative environmental effects such
as anoxia (oxygen depletion) and severe reductions in water quality may occur, affecting fish and
other animal populations.
Pathogens
Burkholderia pseudomallei
Cryptosporidium parvum
Giardia lamblia
Salmonella
Norovirus and other viruses
Parasitic worms including the Schistosoma type
High levels of pathogens may result from on-site sanitation systems (septic tanks, pit latrines) or
inadequately treated sewage discharges. Older cities with ageing infrastructure may have leaky
sewage collection systems (pipes, pumps, valves), which can cause sanitary sewer overflows. Some
cities also have combined sewers, which may discharge untreated sewage during rain
storms. Silt (sediment) from sewage discharges also pollutes water bodies.
SAGAR SUNUWAR 19
Organic water pollutants include:
Detergents
Disinfection by-products found in chemically disinfected drinking water, such
as chloroform
Food processing waste, which can include oxygen-demanding substances, fats and grease
Insecticides and herbicides, a huge range of organohalides and other chemical compounds
Petroleum hydrocarbons, including fuels (gasoline, diesel fuel, jet fuels, and fuel oil) and
lubricants (motor oil), and fuel combustion byproducts, from storm water runoff[28]
Volatile organic compounds, such as industrial solvents, from improper storage.
Chlorinated solvents, which are dense non-aqueous phase liquids, may fall to the bottom of
reservoirs, since they don't mix well with water and are denser.
o Polychlorinated biphenyl (PCBs)
o Trichloroethylene
Perchlorate
Various chemical compounds found in personal hygiene and cosmetic products
Drug pollution involving pharmaceutical drugs and their metabolites, this can
include antidepressant drugs or hormonal medicines such as contraceptive pills.
These molecules can be small and difficult for treatment plants to remove without
expensive upgrades.[29]
Inorganic water pollutants include:
Trash or garbage (e.g. paper, plastic, or food waste) discarded by people on the ground,
along with accidental or intentional dumping of rubbish, that are washed by rainfall
into storm drains and eventually discharged into surface waters.
Nurdles, small ubiquitous waterborne plastic pellets. See plastic pollution
Shipwrecks, large derelict ships.
Change in temperature
Thermal pollution is the rise or fall in the temperature of a natural body of water caused by human
influence. Thermal pollution, unlike chemical pollution, results in a change in the physical properties
of water. A common cause of thermal pollution is the use of water as a coolant by power plants and
industrial manufacturers. Elevated water temperatures decrease oxygen levels, which can kill fish and
SAGAR SUNUWAR 20
alter food chain composition, reduce species biodiversity, and foster invasion by
new thermophilic species. Urban runoff may also elevate temperature in surface waters. [32]
Thermal pollution can also be caused by the release of very cold water from the base of reservoirs into
warmer rivers.
Ways to reduce Water Pollution:
Municipal wastewater treatment
In urban areas of developed countries, municipal wastewater (or sewage) is typically treated by
centralized sewage treatment plants. Well-designed and operated systems (i.e., with secondary
treatment steps or more advanced treatment) can remove 90 percent or more of the pollutant load in
sewage. Some plants have additional systems to remove nutrients and pathogens, but these more
advanced treatment steps get progressively more expensive.
Nature-based solutions are also being used instead of (or in combination with) centralized treatment
plants.
Cities with sanitary sewer overflows or combined sewer overflows employ one or
more engineering approaches to reduce discharges of untreated sewage, including:
SAGAR SUNUWAR 21
cooling towers, which transfer waste heat to the atmosphere through evaporation or heat
transfer
cogeneration, a process where waste heat is recycled for domestic or industrial heating
purposes.
SAGAR SUNUWAR 23
mitigation can be modest, provided these solutions are sought in the planning stage of a roadway
project.
Aircraft noise can be reduced by using quieter jet engines. Altering flight paths and time of day
runway has benefited residents near airports.
Soil Pollution:
Soil contamination or soil pollution as part of land degradation is caused by the presence
of xenobiotics (human-made) chemicals or other alteration in the natural soil environment. It is
typically caused by industrial activity, agricultural chemicals or improper disposal of waste.
Causes of Soil Pollution:
Soil pollution can be caused by the following (non-exhaustive list)
Microplastics
Oil spills
Mining and activities by other heavy industries
Accidental spills may happen during activities, etc.
Corrosion of underground storage tanks (including piping used to transmit the contents)
Acid rain
Intensive farming
Agrochemicals, such as pesticides, herbicides and fertilizers
Petrochemicals
Industrial accidents
Road debris
Drainage of contaminated surface water into the soil
Ammunitions, chemical agents, and other agents of war
Waste disposal
o Oil and fuel dumping
o Nuclear wastes
o Direct discharge of industrial wastes to the soil
o Discharge of sewage
o Landfill and illegal dumping
o Coal ash
o Electronic waste
o Contaminated by rocks containing large amounts of toxic elements.
o Contaminated by Pb due to vehicle exhaust, Cd, and Zn caused by tire wear.
o Contamination by strengthening air pollutants by incineration of fossil raw
materials.
The most common chemicals involved are petroleum hydrocarbons, solvents, pesticides, lead, and
other heavy metals.
Any activity that leads to other forms of soil degradation (erosion, compaction, etc.) may indirectly
worsen the contamination effects in that soil remediation becomes more tedious.
Ways to Control Soil Pollution:
Cleanup or environmental remediation is analyzed by environmental scientists who utilize field
measurement of soil chemicals and also apply computer models (GIS in Environmental
Contamination) for analyzing transport and fate of soil chemicals. Various technologies have been
SAGAR SUNUWAR 24
developed for remediation of oil-contaminated soil and sediments There are several principal
strategies for remediation:
Excavate soil and take it to a disposal site away from ready pathways for human or
sensitive ecosystem contact. This technique also applies to dredging of bay
muds containing toxins.
Aeration of soils at the contaminated site (with attendant risk of creating air pollution)
Thermal remediation by introduction of heat to raise subsurface temperatures sufficiently
high to volatize chemical contaminants out of the soil for vapor extraction. Technologies
include ISTD, electrical resistance heating (ERH), and ET-DSP.
Bioremediation, involving microbial digestion of certain organic chemicals. Techniques
used in bioremediation include landfarming, biostimulation and bioaugmentating soil
biota with commercially available microflora.
Extraction of groundwater or soil vapor with an active electromechanical system, with
subsequent stripping of the contaminants from the extract.
Containment of the soil contaminants (such as by capping or paving over in place).
Phytoremediation, or using plants (such as willow) to extract heavy metals.
Mycoremediation, or using fungus to metabolize contaminants and accumulate heavy
metals.
Remediation of oil contaminated sediments with self-collapsing air microbubbles.
Surfactant leaching
Desertification:
Desertification is the degradation process by which a fertile land changes itself into a desert by losing
its flora and fauna, this can be caused by drought, deforestation, climate change, human activities or
improper agriculture. Desertification is a process of degradation of the land. It occurs because of man-
made activities and climate change. Desertification takes place when a particular type of biome
converts into a desert biome.
Causes of Desertification:
2. Overgrazing
3. Deforestation
4. Farming Practices
5. Urbanization and other types of land development
6. Climate Change
7. Stripping the land of resources
8. Natural Disasters
Desertification Impacts
Deforestation:
SAGAR SUNUWAR 25
Deforestation is the removal of a forest or stand of trees from land which is then converted to a non-
forest use. Deforestation can involve conversion of forest land to farms, ranches, or urban use.
The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations defines deforestation as the conversion
of forest to other land uses (regardless of whether it is human-induced).
Deforestation is the process in which large areas of forest lands are cleared for various human
activities. Deforestation has many negative effects on our environment, like loss of habitat for animals
and climate change. The process of deforestation is mainly carried out for monetary gains.
Approximately 18 million acres of forests are cleared each year for various uses causing huge loss to
our environment. The current issue of global warming is majorly related to deforestation.
Causes of Deforestation:
According to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), the
overwhelming direct cause of deforestation is agriculture. Subsistence farming is responsible for 48%
of deforestation; commercial agriculture is responsible for 32%; logging is responsible for 14%, and
fuel wood removals make up 5%.
Other causes of contemporary deforestation may include corruption of government institutions,
the inequitable distribution of wealth and power, population growth and overpopulation,
and urbanization. Globalization is often viewed as another root cause of deforestation, though there
are cases in which the impacts of globalization (new flows of labor, capital, commodities, and ideas)
have promoted localized forest recovery.
Another cause of deforestation is climate change. 23% of tree cover losses result from wildfires and
climate change increase their frequency and power.
Effects of Deforestation:
1. Climate Imbalance and Climate Change
Deforestation also affects the climate in many ways. Forests are the lungs of our planet. Trees take in
carbon dioxide and release oxygen and water vapor in the air, and that is why tropical rainforests are
extremely humid.
Trees also provide shade that keeps the soil moist. All these are compromised with the lack of trees. It
leads to the imbalance in the atmospheric temperature, drier climate, further making conditions for
the ecology difficult that leads to climate change.
Several animals and plant species that form the flora and fauna across the world are vastly
accustomed to their natural habitat. Therefore, haphazard clearance of forests would make it very
difficult for them to survive or to shift from their native environment or adapt to new habitats.
When a forest is cut down, the humidity levels come down and cause the remaining plants to dry out.
The drying out tropical rainforests increases fire damage that destroys forests rapidly and harms wild
animals as well as humans.
Forests and climate are linked intrinsically. Forest loss and degradation are both a cause and an effect
of our changing climate. At the same time, deforestation is self-perpetuating.
Therefore, these occurrences are dangerous and fuel further deforestation. Also, the loss of trees
allows for flooding, soil erosion, desertification, and higher temperatures to occur more rapidly and
exponentially.
Source: Canva
SAGAR SUNUWAR 26
Forests help to mitigate carbon dioxide and other toxic greenhouse gas emissions. However, once
they’re cut, burned, or otherwise removed, they become carbon sources.
It’s estimated that deforestation is responsible for around 20 percent of greenhouse gas emissions,
and due to tropical deforestation, 1.5 billion tons of carbon is released every year in the atmosphere.
4. Soil Erosion
Trees are also crucial for our local water cycles as they keep on returning water vapor to the
atmosphere. The soil remains moist as the rainwater percolates within the soil.
The fertile soil is held in place by intricate root structures of many layers of trees. With the clearance
of tree cover, the land is directly exposed to the sun, making it dry.
Without trees, erosion often occurs and sweeps the land into nearby rivers and streams. Forests serve
as nature’s water purification plants. Soil erosion makes soil exposed to contaminants that leach into
the water supply, which damages the quality of our drinking water.
5. Floods
When it rains, trees absorb and store a large amount of water with the help of their roots. When they
are cut down, the flow of water is disrupted, and the soil loses its ability to retain water. It leads to
floods in some areas and droughts in others.
SAGAR SUNUWAR 27
The ozone layer is a region of Earth's stratosphere that absorbs most of the Sun's ultraviolet radiation
and contains a high concentration of ozone (O3) in relation to other parts of the atmosphere.
Formation of Ozone Layer:
Ozone in the Earth's stratosphere is created by ultraviolet light striking
ordinary oxygen molecules containing two oxygen atoms (O2), splitting them into individual oxygen
atoms (atomic oxygen); the atomic oxygen then combines with unbroken O 2 to create ozone, O3. The
ozone molecule is unstable and when ultraviolet light hits ozone it splits into a molecule of O 2 and an
individual atom of oxygen, a continuing process called the ozone-oxygen cycle. Chemically, this can be
described as:
O2 + ℎνuv → 2 O
O + O2 ↔️O3
Ozone Layer Depletion:
Ozone can be destroyed by a number of free radical catalysts; the most important are
the hydroxyl radical (OH·), nitric oxide radical (NO·), chlorine radical (Cl·) and bromine radical
(Br·). At present all of these have both natural and man-made sources. These elements are
found in stable organic compounds, especially chlorofluorocarbons, which can travel to the
stratosphere without being destroyed in the troposphere due to their low reactivity. Once in
the stratosphere, the Cl and Br atoms are released from the parent compounds by the action of
ultraviolet light, e.g.
CFCl3 + electromagnetic radiation → Cl· + ·CFCl2
Ozone is a highly reactive molecule that easily reduces to the more stable oxygen form with the
assistance of a catalyst. Cl and Br atoms destroy ozone molecules through a variety of catalytic cycles.
In the simplest example of such a cycle, a chlorine atom reacts with an ozone molecule (O3), taking an
oxygen atom to form chlorine monoxide (ClO) and leaving an oxygen molecule (O2). The ClO can react
with a second molecule of ozone, releasing the chlorine atom and yielding two molecules of oxygen.
The chemical shorthand for these gas-phase reactions is:
Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs)
SAGAR SUNUWAR 28
CFCs (chlorofluorocarbons)
Halon
H CFCs (hydro-chlorofluorocarbons)
Chlorofluorocarbons
Methyl bromide
The main cause for the depletion of ozone is determined as excessive release of chlorine and bromine
from man-made compounds such as chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs). CFCs (chlorofluorocarbons), halons,
CH3CCl3 (Methyl chloroform), CCl4 (Carbon tetrachloride), HCFCs (hydro-chlorofluorocarbons),
hydrobromofluorocarbons and methyl bromide are found to have a direct impact on the depletion of
the ozone layer. These are categorized as ozone-depleting substances (ODS).
The problem with the Ozone-Depleting Substances (ODS) is that they are not washed back in the form
of rain on the earth and in-fact remain in the atmosphere for quite a long time. With so much stability,
they are transported into the stratosphere.
The emission of ODS accounts for roughly 90% of the total depletion of the ozone layer in the
stratosphere. These gases are carried to the stratosphere layer of the atmosphere where ultraviolet
radiation from the sun breaks them to release chlorine (from CFCs) and bromine (from methyl
bromide and halons).
The chlorine and bromine free radicals react with the ozone molecules and destroy their molecular
structure, thus depleting the ozone layer. One chlorine atom can break more than 1, 00,000 molecules
of ozone. Bromine atom is believed to be 40 times more destructive than chlorine molecules.
Consequences of Ozone Layer Depletion:
a. Increase in UV Rayes
Ozone layer is responsible for most of the absorption of UVB radiation. The amount of UVB radiation
that penetrates through the ozone layer decreases exponentially with the thickness and density of the
layer. When stratospheric ozone levels decrease, higher levels of UVB reach the Earth's surface.
b. Biological Effects
The main public concern regarding the ozone hole has been the effects of increased UV radiation on
human health. Ozone depletion would magnify all of the effects of UV on human health, both positive
(including production of vitamin D) and negative (including sunburn, skin cancer, and cataracts). In
addition, increased surface UV leads to increased tropospheric ozone, which is a health risk to
humans.
c. Effects on Animals
A November 2011 report by scientists at the Institute of Zoology in London found that whales off the
coast of California have shown a sharp rise in sun damage, and these scientists "fear that the thinning
ozone layer is to blame. Apart from whales many other animals such as dogs, cats, sheep and
terrestrial ecosystems also suffer the negative effects of increased UV-B radiations.
d. Effects on Crops
An increase of UV radiation would be expected to affect crops. A number of economically important
species of plants, such as rice, depend on cyanobacteria residing on their roots for the retention
SAGAR SUNUWAR 29
of nitrogen. Cyanobacteria are sensitive to UV radiation and would be affected by its increase. "Despite
mechanisms to reduce or repair the effects of increased ultraviolet radiation, plants have a limited
ability to adapt to increased levels of UVB, therefore plant growth can be directly affected by UVB
radiation.
Solutions to Ozone Layer Depletion:
Less use of Fuel: by reducing the usage of the fuels and petroleum used in vehicles nowadays we can
help in reducing the ozone layer depletion
Less use of pesticides: pesticides helps in growing your farms and plants but cause harm to the ozone
layer and contribute to ozone layer depletion.
Limited use of harmful chemicals for cleaning: the chemicals used for making cleaning products
results in depletion of the ozone layer.
3. Certainty:The process and timing of the assessment should be agreed by all participants in advance.
4. Accountability: The decision makers of all parties are responsible for their action and decisions
under the assessment process.
5. Credibility: Assessment is undertaken with professionalism and objectivity.
6. Cost effectiveness: The assessment process and its outcomes will ensure environmental protection
at the least cost to the society.
SAGAR SUNUWAR 30
7. Flexibility: The assessment process should be able to deal efficiently with any proposal and decision
making situation.
8. Practicality: The information and outputs provided by the assessment process are readily usable in
decision making and planning.
History of EIA
Environmental impact assessments commenced in the 1960s, as part of increasing environmental
awareness. In the United States, environmental impact assessments obtained formal status in 1969,
with the enactment of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). EIAs have been used
increasingly around the world. The number of environmental assessments filed every year "has vastly
overtaken the number of more rigorous Environmental Impact Statements (EIS). An environmental
assessment is a "mini-EIS designed to provide sufficient information to allow the agency to decide
whether the preparation of a full-blown Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is necessary.
Common Stages in an EIA Process
Typically, the EIA process begins with screening to ensure that time and resources are directed at the
proposals that matter environmentally and end with some form of follow up on the implementation of
the decisions and actions taken as a result of an EIA report. The eight steps of the EIA process are
briefly presented below.
1) Screening: First stage of EIA, which determines whether the proposed project, requires an EIA and
if it requires EIA, then the level of assessment required.
2) Scoping: This stage identifies the key issues and impact that should be further investigated. This
stage also defines the boundary and time limit of the study.
3) Impact analysis: This stage of EIA identifies and predicts likely environmental and social impact of
the proposed project and evaluates the significance.
4) Mitigation: This step in EIA recommends the actions to reduce and avoid the potential adverse
environmental consequences of development activities.
5) Reporting: This stage presents the result of EIA in a form of a report to the decision-making body
and other interested parties.
6) Review of EIA: It examines the adequacy and effectiveness of the EIA report and provides
information necessary for the decision-making.
7) Decision-making: It decides whether the project is rejected, approved or needs further change.
8) Post monitoring: This stage comes into play once the project is commissioned. It checks whether
the impacts of the project do not exceed the legal standards and implementation of the mitigation
measures are in the manner as described in the EIA report.
Some Misconceptions about EIA:
SAGAR SUNUWAR 31
Global Warming:
A gradual increase in the overall temperature of the earth's atmosphere generally attributed to the
greenhouse effect caused by increased levels of carbon dioxide, CFCs, and other pollutants.
Global Warming is defined as the increase in the earth’s atmospheric and oceanic temperatures,
widely due to an increase in the greenhouse effect resulting from various reasons.
Causes of Global Warming or Climate Change
Natural Causes of Global Warming
1. Forest Fires
Deforestation by nature is another leading cause of global warming. Forest fires emit carbon-filled
smoke into the atmosphere, and new forests’ growth is slow and not stable enough to produce the
much-needed oxygen into the newly, suffocating carbon air. Natural forest fires will eventually run
their course, but left in the ashes are polluting gases that get trapped in the atmosphere.
2. Permafrost
When frozen soil, constituting about 25% of the Northern Hemisphere, increases, it keeps in the
carbon and methane gases. Permafrost is actually leaking carbon into the earth’s atmosphere. While
scientists cannot stop permafrost from emitting these gases, the earth’s melting icecaps at incredibly
fast rates, are cause for concern.
3. Sunspots
According to the Environment Protection Agency (EPA), sunspots are increasing global temperature.
Sunspots restrict the passing of solar plasma, which in turn gives off radiation. Sunspots and solar
flares are powerful and unstoppable.
They can change the energy radiating to earth’s atmosphere, and thus increase climate temperature.
Solar flares, however, have been a naturally occurring event for millions of years.
4. Water Vapor
According to NASA, two-thirds of the gases stuck in the thick blanket is in the form of water vapor.
This hitch in tow effect means rising temperature, rising vapor. The water vapor is unable to escape
and thus results in hotter climate changes.
5. Man’s Best Friend
Our friendly, furry, bizarre, and sometimes extreme pals in the animal kingdom are also to blame, sort
of. While animals also breathe out carbon dioxide and methane, their small contribution is miniscule
compared to humans and their consumption of non-renewable energy. Nature’s animal release of
carbon dioxide, although minor, is still a natural causing factor in releasing more carbon dioxide into
the atmosphere.
Human Causes of Global Warming
1. Man-induced Deforestation
Deforestation is the cutting down of trees and plants to make way for any development activity.
Mother nature taking out an entire forest is one thing, but the man doing it for the use of crop
cultivation, fuel, and other consumption, is another. Each day our forests are bulldozed for the
prospect of farms and factories. Fuel used for wood and charcoal only adds to the polluted gases in the
atmosphere.
The loss of our forests results in a chain reaction where too much carbon is released into the air, with
not enough oxygen to combat it. Deforestation is blamed for the rise in the greenhouse gases present
in the atmosphere by cutting or burning them.
2. Fossil Fuels
Pollution, whether it is vehicular, electrical or industrial, is the main contributor to global warming.
Every day billions of vehicles release various gases into the atmosphere. This causes the Earth to
warm up and increase its average temperature. Electricity causes pollution in many ways. Over 75%
of electricity worldwide is produced by the burning of fossil fuels. Many gases are sent into the air
when fossil fuels are burnt of which main is the carbon dioxide gas.
Fossil fuel like coal is burnt to produce electricity. Coal is the major fuel that is burnt to produce
power. Coal produces around 1.7 times as much carbon dioxide per unit of energy when flamed as
does natural gas and 1.25 times as much as oil.
SAGAR SUNUWAR 32
Industries, on the other hand, release various gases into the water and air. Carbon dioxide, methane
and nitrous oxide are the major greenhouse gases. Different gases have different heat-trapping
capabilities. Some of them trap more heat than carbon dioxide. Methane is much more effective than
carbon dioxide in entrapping heat in the atmosphere. By driving cars, using electricity from coal-fired
plants and heating up our homes from natural gases, we release carbon dioxide and other heat-
trapping gases in the atmosphere.
3. Landfills
When we throw garbage out of our house it goes to landfills. Landfills are those big chunks of garbage
that stink and can be seen in so many places around the world. The garbage is then used by big
recycling companies to make some useful products out from it.
Most of the time that garbage is burnt which releases toxic gases including methane into the
atmosphere. These enormous amounts of toxic greenhouse gases when go into the atmosphere make
global warming worse.
4. Overpopulation
Another cause of global warming is overpopulation. Since carbon dioxide contributes to global
warming, the increase in population makes the problem worse because we breathe out more carbon
dioxide in the atmosphere. More people means more demand for food, more carbon dioxide in the
atmosphere, more demand for cars and more demand for homes.
More demand for food will lead to more transportation since the movement of goods and services is
done by the transportation sector. More demand for cars means more pollution in the air and more
traffic on the roads which means longer waiting time on the traffic lights and that will result in the
burning of more fuel. More demand for homes means cutting down of plants and trees to make way
for homes, schools, and colleges.
5. Mining
Oil and coal are the two main culprits in producing greenhouse gases. Methane, like carbon dioxide,
creates a thick shield over the atmosphere trapping the sun’s rays. With the continued use of mining
operations, these harmful gases will only increase.
6. Fertilizer Use
The unique thing about fertilizer is that it produces nitrous oxide once it absorbs the soil. Nitrous
oxide is 300 times more dangerous than carbon dioxide. The EPA strongly warns that the farming
industry’s use of fertilizer is one of the leading causes of global warming.
7. Meat Consumption
Due to our Western diet and habits, the raising, grazing, and manufacturing of animal products
contribute greatly to the rise of global temperature.According to research, 51% of the greenhouse
gases: methane, carbon dioxide, and nitrous oxide are caused by animal agriculture. If we would stop
ordering juicy cheeseburgers, excessive amounts of carbon dioxide by animals stop emitting the
atmosphere.
Agro-ecology:
Agro-ecology is the study of ecological processes applied to agricultural production systems. Bringing
ecological principles into agroecosystems could suggest novel management approaches that would
not help in climate change. Agroecology encompasses the relationship between agricultural
production systems and ecological processes. It includes all the techniques that allow agricultural
practices to be more respectful of the environment and its ecological specificities.
Strengths of natural ecosystems
Natural ecosystems exhibit certain strengths or characteristics. These include the following:
1. Efficiency. Efficient energy flows are characteristic of natural systems. The sun’s energy captured by
green plants is then used by many organisms, as fungi and bacteria decompose organic residues and
SAGAR SUNUWAR 33
are then fed upon by other organisms, which are themselves fed upon by others higher up the food
web. Natural ecosystems also tend to be efficient in capturing and using rainfall and in mobilizing and
cycling nutrients. This helps to keep the ecosystem from ‘running down’ through the excessive loss of
nutrients and at the same time helps maintain the quality of the groundwater and surface waters.
Precipitation tends to enter the porous soil, rather than runoff, providing water to plants as well as
recharge to ground water, slowly releasing water to streams and rivers.
2. Diversity. A great biological diversity, both above ground and in the soil, characterizes many natural
ecosystems in temperate and tropical regions. This provides checks and balances, nutrient availability
to plants, checks on disease outbreaks, etc. For example, competition for resources and specific
antagonisms (such as antibiotic production) from the multitude of soil organisms usually keep soil
borne plant diseases from severely damaging a natural grassland or forest.
3. Self-sufficiency. A consequence of efficiency and diversity is that natural terrestrial ecosystems are
self sufficient— requiring only inputs of sunlight and rainfall.
4. Self-regulation. Because of the great diversity of organisms, outbreaks (or huge population
increases) of diseases or insects that severely damage plants or animals are uncommon. In addition,
plants have a number of defense mechanisms that help protect them from attack.
5. Resiliency. Disturbances occur in all ecosystems— natural or not. The stronger ones are more
resistant to disturbances and are able to bounce back quicker.
Climate change is a complex problem, which, although environmental in nature, touches and has
consequences for all spheres of existence of our people. It impacts on and is impacted by global issues,
including food, trade,
poverty, economic development, population growth, sustainable development and resource
management. Stabilizing the climate is a definitely a huge challenge that requires planning and steps
in the right directions. However, the bigger questions lie in understanding not just the ‘how much’ but
also the ‘how-to’- how to reduce these emissions, how to produce enough healthy food and how to
have clean energy?
Solutions for mitigating climate change come from all arenas in the form of creating new technologies,
renewable clean energies and even changing management practices. Agroecology is one such practice
that deals with the ‘how to’ of mitigation as well as adaptation to climate change. The uncertainty of
raising temperatures, erratic rainfall patterns, droughts and the emergence of unfamiliar pests and
diseases, demands a form of agriculture that is resilient, and a system of food production that
supports local knowledge transfer and on farm experimentation through building adaptive capacity of
farmers. Majority of climate change mitigation activities are foundations of organic practices. Organic
production systems serve as the best widespread examples of low emissions agriculture. Organic
systems are more resilient than industrial systems in terms of withstanding environmental shocks
and stresses including droughts and flooding. Conventional agriculture releases high carbon
emissions due to the over use of fossil fuels and destroys biodiversity. For agriculture, the idea is for a
shift towards agroecological models of production that allow drastic reductions in the use of fossil
fuels, present great mitigation potential through soil, wildlife and plant rejuvenation, and have the
SAGAR SUNUWAR 34
flexibility as well as diversity required to allow adaptation to changing conditions. In practice,
agriculture can contribute to cooling the planet in three ways: by reducing the use of fossil fuel
(through
reducing and/or completely removing chemical and synthetic fertilizers and pesticide production)
and of fossil fuel powered transport and machinery; by positively effecting biodiversity and by
slowing the release of biotic carbon.
Agroecology can significantly impact climate change positively as it builds: Agro-ecosystem resilience
that would look at consistency and sustainability of yield even and especially so, with the changing
climate; Livelihood resilience that would help in achieving diversification of livelihood options
through poultry, cattle, fish breeding etc...
This also helps in separating agricultural practice from instability and changes in other markets, while
holding assets on the farm and also reduced or completely stops dependency on external inputs.
Smallholder agroecology is not only an effective solution to complex agricultural challenges, but also
an affordable way to increase yields without external inputs outside the farm. Further, it offers low
inputs, low emissions and local control over production decisions, offering Food Sovereignty
alternative to the unsustainable agro-monocultures currently being pushed to address the food
crisis. Several characteristics that are found in local or indigenous breeds will become increasingly
important as climate change alters the environment and affects the produce. Local seeds and crops
have a much better chance of
survival in their local environment with the changing climate conditions. Their protection, along with
the local knowledge is critical to their management and breeding, is extremely crucial to feed us in the
future.
Agro-ecological solutions to climate change are based on a systemic approach, on a deep
understanding of the transformation processes of living beings, which involve political, social and
economic transformations. Multi-functional and diverse agricultural systems and locally diversified
food systems are essential to ensure food security in an era of climate change. A rapid global
transition to such systems is imperative both to mitigate climate change and to ensure food security.
As stated in the “Declaration of Small Food Producers and Civil Society Organisations” at the Second
International Symposium on Agroecology: “Agroecology cannot be understood as a simple set of
production techniques and practices. Agroecology is a lifestyle to our peoples, carried on in harmony
with the language of nature. It represents a paradigm shift in the way we deploy social, political,
productive and economic relations with our territories, to transform the way we produce and
consume food and to restore a socio-cultural reality devastated by industrial food production.
Agroecology generates local knowledge, builds social justice, promotes identity and culture and
strengthens the economic vitality of rural and urban areas.
The following are some adaptive measures for eco-friendly agriculture systems.
The more an agricultural systems can be modelled close to natural ecosystem, it will more adaptive to
the climate change. The natural system which is efficient, diverse, self-regulating, resilient will cope up
better with any unfavorable effects including the adverse impacts of climate change. Thus, the
following are some measures to keep our agriculture system close to natural ecosystem thereby
safeguarding them from unfavorable climate systems.
1. Select crops and varieties resistant to local pests (in addition to other qualities such as yield, taste,
etc.)
SAGAR SUNUWAR 35
2. Plant perimeter (trap) crops that are more attractive to a particular pest than the economic crop(s)
growing in the middle of the field and can intercept incoming insects.
3. Create field boundaries and zones within fields that are attractive to beneficial insects. This usually
involves planting a mix of flowering plants around or inside fields to provide shelter and food for
beneficial.
4. Use cover crops routinely to provide multiple benefits such as habitat for beneficial insects, adding
N and organic matter to soil, reducing erosion and enhancing water infiltration into the soil, retaining
nutrients in soil, (and much more). It is possible to supply all of the nitrogen to succeeding crops by
growing a vigorous winter legume cover crop such as crimson clover in the south and hairy vetch in
the north.
5. Use rotations that are complex, involve plants of different families and, if at all possible, include sod
crops such as grass/clover hay that remain without soil disturbance for a number of years.
7. Add large quantities of organic materials on a regular basis—animal manures, composts, tree
leaves, cover crops, rotation crops that leave large amounts of residues. Soil organic matter and its
management are at the heart of creating healthy soils that have significant internal strengths that
produce healthy plants that have good defense mechanisms.
11. Falling back from crops to wild edible fruits, roots and leaves. Promoting the growth of
forests can provide these backup food supplies, and also provide watershed conservation,
carbon sequestration, and aesthetic value.
Climate Change
Refers to any change in climate over time, whether due to natural variability or as a result of
human activity. (IPCC TAR, 2001 a)
SAGAR SUNUWAR 36
Refers to a statistically significant variation in either the mean state of the climate or in its
variability, persisting for an extended period (typically decades or longer). Climate change may be
due to natural processes or external forcing, or to persistent anthropogenic changes in the
composition of the atmosphere or in land-use. (IPCC TAR, 2001 b)
The climate of a place or region is changed if over an extended period (typically decades or longer)
there is a statistically significant change in measurements of either the mean state or variability of
the climate for that place or region. (Changes in climate may be due to natural processes or to
persistent anthropogenic changes in atmosphere or in land use. Note that the definition of climate
change used in the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change is more restricted,
as it includes only those changes which are attributable directly or indirectly to human activity.)
(UN/ISDR, 2004)
Greenhouse Effect
The greenhouse effect occurs when energy from the sun passes through a planet's atmosphere and
warms its surface, but the atmosphere prevents the heat from returning directly to space, resulting in
a warmer planet. Simply, the greenhouse effect is the way heat is trapped close to Earth's surface by
"greenhouse gases". Greenhouse gases include carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxides, and water
vapor.
A greenhouse is a house made of glass that can be used to grow plants. The sun’s radiations warm the
plants and the air inside the greenhouse. The heat trapped inside can’t escape out and warms the
greenhouse which is essential for the growth of the plants.
Same is the case in the earth’s atmosphere. During the day the sun heats up the earth’s atmosphere. At
night, when the earth cools down the heat is radiated back into the atmosphere. During this process,
the heat is absorbed by the greenhouse gases in the earth’s atmosphere. This is what makes the
surface of the earth warmer, that makes the survival of living beings on earth possible.
However, due to the increased levels of greenhouse gases, the temperature of the earth has increased
considerably. This has led to several drastic effects.
Greenhouse Gases
“Greenhouse gases are the gases that absorb the infrared radiations and create a greenhouse effect. For
eg., carbondioxide and chlorofluorocarbons.”
Greenhouse Gases such as carbon dioxide is the primary cause for the Greenhouse Effect
The major contributors to the greenhouses gases are factories, automobiles, deforestation, etc. The
increased number of factories and automobiles increases the amount of these gases in the
atmosphere. The greenhouse gases never let the radiations to escape from the earth and increase the
surface temperature of the earth. This then leads to global warming.
Deforestation
Plants and trees take in carbon dioxide and release oxygen. Due to the cutting of trees, there is a
considerable increase in the greenhouse gases which increases the earth’s temperature.
Farming
Nitrous oxide used in fertilizers is one of the contributors to the greenhouse effect in the atmosphere.
Global Warming
It is the phenomenon of a gradual increase in the average temperature of the Earth’s atmosphere. The
main cause for this environmental issue is the increased volumes of greenhouse gases such as carbon
dioxide and methane released by the burning of fossil fuels, emissions from the vehicles, industries
and other human activities.
SAGAR SUNUWAR 38
Runaway Greenhouse Effect
This phenomenon occurs when the planet absorbs more radiations than it can radiate back. Thus, the
heat lost from the earth’s surface is less and the temperature of the planet keeps rising. Scientists
believe that this phenomenon took place on the surface of Venus billions of years ago.
This phenomenon is believed to have occurred in the following manner:
A runaway greenhouse effect arises when the temperature of a planet rises to a level of the
boiling point of water. As a result, all the water from the oceans converts into water vapour,
which traps more heat coming from the sun and further increases the planet’s temperature.
This eventually accelerates the greenhouse effect. This is also called the “positive feedback
loop”.
There is another scenario giving way to the runaway greenhouse effect. Suppose the
temperature rise due to the above causes reaches such a high level that the chemical reactions
begin to occur. These chemical reactions drive carbon dioxide from the rocks into the
atmosphere. This would heat the surface of the planet which would further accelerate the
transfer of carbon dioxide from the rocks to the atmosphere, giving rise to the runaway
greenhouse effect.
In simple words, increasing the greenhouse effect gives rise to a runaway greenhouse effect which
would increase the temperature of the earth to such an extent that no life will exist in the near future.
It is the heat which escapes in the space, the The earth gets overheated by greenhouse gases
greenhouse gases block this escaping heat and and fossil fuels leading to the greenhouse effect,
hence it enters the earth which is global warming
Heat/Temperature aspect
It is how the atmosphere retains heat as the Increase in the average annual temperature
result of greenhouse gases globally
Cause
SAGAR SUNUWAR 39
greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, either by reducing sources of these gases (for
example, the burning of fossil fuels for electricity, heat, or transport) or enhancing the “sinks”
that accumulate and store these gases (such as the oceans, forests, and soil). The goal of
mitigation is to avoid significant human interference with Earth's climate, “stabilize greenhouse
gas levels in a timeframe sufficient to allow ecosystems to adapt naturally to climate change,
ensure that food production is not threatened, and to enable economic development to
proceed in a sustainable manner” (from the 2014 report on Mitigation of Climate Change from
the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, page 4.
The most important challenge is to stop burning coal, oil, and gas and use only clean energy. Some of
the mitigation plans against climate change are mentioned below:
Carbon Sequestration
Carbon sequestration is a process to capture and store CO2 to curb global warming. It is captured
from the air, industries or power stations and stored permanently underground. This promotes:
Trapping & separating CO2 from other gases à Transporting captured CO2 to storage location à Storing
CO2 far from atmosphere, either in deep ocean or underground.
Terrestrial
sequestration ● Stored in soils and vegetation through decomposed matter &
photosynthesis respectively.
SAGAR SUNUWAR 40
● Combines with solubility trapping
Mineral
carbonation ● Forms stable compounds like iron, calcium by reacting with
minerals/organic matter
Sinks
Afforestation and reforestation can enhance it Found in all continents except Antarctica
Conservation International (CI), International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) and the
Intergovernmental Oceanic Commission (IOC) of UNESCO has collaborated with governments
SAGAR SUNUWAR 41
and organisations across the world to develop mechanisms for ensuring coastal Blue Carbon
ecosystems.
It also comprises:
Engagement of local, national and international organisations
Comprehensive methods for carbon accounting
Incentive mechanism
Scientific research for climate mitigation
CARBON CREDIT
A Carbon Credit is a tradable permit that certifies the right to emit 1 ton of CO2 or its equivalent
As per gas emissions norms laid down by signatories of the Kyoto Protocol under UNFCCC, companies
have two ways to reduce emissions:
SAGAR SUNUWAR 42
Installing protective and/ or resilient technologies and materials in properties that are
prone to flooding
Changing to heat tolerant tree varieties
Rainwater storage to deal with more frequent flooding rainfall – Changing to water-
permeable pavements, adding water-buffering vegetation, adding underground storage
tanks, subsidizing household rain barrels
Reducing paved areas to deal with rainwater and heat
Adding green roofs to deal with rainwater and heat
Adding air conditioning in public schools
Requiring waterfront properties to have higher foundations
Raising pumps at wastewater treatment plants
Surveying local vulnerabilities, raising public awareness, and making climate change-
specific planning tools like future flood maps
Incentivizing lighter-colored roofs to reduce the heat island effect
Installing devices to prevent seawater from backflowing into storm drains
Installing better flood defenses, such as sea walls and increased pumping capacity
Buying out homeowners in flood-prone areas
Raising street level to prevent flooding
Climate change and gender is a way to interpret the disparate impacts of climate change on men and
women, based on the social construction of gender roles and relations. Climate change
increases gender inequality, reduces women's ability to be financially independent, and has an overall
negative impact on the social and political rights of women, especially in economies that are heavily
based on agriculture. In many cases, gender inequality means that women are more vulnerable to the
negative effects of climate change. This is due to gender roles, particularly in the developing world,
which means that women are often dependent on the natural environment for subsistence and
income. By further limiting women's already constrained access to physical, social, political, and fiscal
resources, climate change often burdens women more than men and can magnify existing gender
inequality.
Climate change impacts men and women differently due to differences in their traditional roles,
societal expectations, and livelihoods. Women, who make up the majority of the developing world’s
1.4 billion poor, generally have lower incomes, less access to credit and decision making authority,
and limited control over resources, increasing their vulnerability to many climate impacts. The
different societal roles and responsibilities of men and women also present different opportunities for
incorporating clean energy alternatives into their lives. It is crucial to understand these distinctions in
order to successfully integrate climate change into development efforts.
Women produce 60% to 80% of the food in developing countries. More frequent and severe
drought, flooding, and pest damage due to climate change is expected to reduce crop yields.
In many societies women have the primary responsibility for collecting water and firewood. As
climate change exacerbates resource scarcity, women and girls may have to travel farther to
collect water and firewood, increasing threats to their safety, decreasing productivity in other
areas like farming, and reducing time available for schooling.
Climate change is expected to increase the frequency and severity of extreme weather events.
During and after natural disasters, a woman’s role as family caregiver is intensified, potentially
SAGAR SUNUWAR 43
leading to exhaustion and illness. Studies have also shown an increase in levels of domestic and
sexual violence following disasters.
Women are already more vulnerable to undernutrition and have less access to medical services
than men; climate change can exacerbate this situation. Changing temperatures alter vectors
for diseases like malaria, higher sea-surface temperatures are correlated with cholera
epidemics, and more frequent droughts and floods will worsen sanitation and hygiene.
The IPCC Fifth Assessment Report concludes that there is 'robust evidence' for an increase of
gender inequalities as a result of weather events as well as for the perpetuation of differential
vulnerabilities. The increase of inequalities due to climate change can have several reasons. For
example, girls often face more serious risks than boys due to unequal distribution of scarce
resources within the household. This effect is amplified by climate change induced resource
scarcity. Furthermore, climate change often results in an increase of out-migration of men. This
leaves women with an increased work-load at home, resulting in a feminization of
responsibilities.[1] Climate change is predicted to increase frequency and magnitude of natural
hazards such as extreme heat. During and after these hazards especially women are burdened
with increased care work for children, the sick and old, adding furthermore to already
significant amount of household duties. Women also tend to donate their food in times of food
scarcity, leaving them more vulnerable to health, social and psychological damages.
Climate Change and Ethnic Minorities:
The close relationship of some indigenous peoples and minorities with their natural environments
makes them especially sensitive to the effects of global warming. In some cases, peoples’ ways of life
and even their very existence are being threatened by climate change, and by the rapidly increasing
cultivation of biofuels, which are being touted as part of the ‘solution’.
Indigenous people are known as people who inherited a land first and have a close connection with
that land. For example, the native people of Napa County include the Onastis (Wappo), Miwok, and
Hokan (Pomo) people. The Napa Valley is known to be one of the longest inhabited areas of land in
Northern America. As the Europeans invaded northern America, they spread disease and pushed the
native people out of their land. Native people have faced many difficulties the European invaders have
inflicted upon them, and continue to, due to how poorly we have been treating their land.
Climate Change affects minorities and indigenous people in many ways. Often, minorities live in areas
that are more prone to destruction due to Climate Change. Governments have discriminated against
minorities by making it difficult for them to live safely in their environment. They often live in poverty,
in parts of cities that are not well taken care of, compared to other parts of cities where wealthier
people live in luxury. As an example, after Hurricane Katrina hit, there were major floods that
followed. New Orleans, Louisiana, received 10 inches of rain before the hurricane even surged over
the city, leaving 80% of the city underwater after it hit, according to Encyclopedia Britannica. In a
briefing written by Rachel Baird for the Minority Rights Group International, she wrote, “A Brookings
Institution report on the disaster found that ‘those areas hit hardest by the flood were
disproportionately non-white. Overall, Blacks and other minority residents made up 58 percent of
those whose neighborhoods were flooded, though they encompassed just 45 percent of the
metropolitan population.’” It is not a coincidence that non-white communities were of those hit the
hardest by the hurricane, yet people fail to realize it as an issue, including their government, that
should be doing everything in its power to keep them safe.
SAGAR SUNUWAR 44
growing to nearly 10 billion by mid-century and to more than 11 billion by 2100 (FAO, 2016; UN,
2017; Popkin et al., 2012). Current and future agricultural systems are additionally burdened by
human-caused climate change, the result of accumulating greenhouse gas and aerosol emissions,
ecological destruction, and land use changes that have altered the chemical composition of Earth’s
atmosphere and trapped energy in the Earth system (IPCC, 2013; Porter et al., 2014).
Climate change impacts on agriculture must be understood in the context of the intertwined systems
that affect food security and agricultural trade, including biological, socioeconomic, and political
processes. Rapid gains in socioeconomic development around the world may give the mistaken
impression that climate change is not detrimental, but in many of these regions climate change
impacts act as an additional burden holding back the pace of development. In addition to the
biological impact of changing climate conditions on farms, future agricultural production will be
affected by economic and policy incentives across a wide variety of stakeholders and actors both
locally and interacting through global markets (Valdivia et al., 2015).
Direct Impacts of Climate Change on Agriculture:
Direct impacts of climate, including atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations, on agricultural
systems include effects on plant development, grain productivity, and mortality. Notably, direct
climate impacts include both damage and benefits as well as opportunities for farm-level adaptations.
In assessing vulnerabilities and opportunities of farming systems, it is also important to recognize that
C3 plants (e.g., wheat, rice, soy, potato, and peanut) generally react more strongly than C4 plants (e.g.,
maize, sugarcane, sorghum) to both increases in temperature and CO2. Characteristics of direct
climate impacts have been investigated using a variety of chamber and field experiment approaches,
although published studies have focused more on mid-latitude and high-input cereals while direct
impacts on tropical cropping systems, perennials, fruits, and vegetables have persistent uncertainties
(Porter et al., 2014; Long et al., 2006; Tubiello et al., 2007a,b; Ainsworth et al., 2008; Boote et al.,
2010). Interactions between soils and climate changes are crucial, as the full benefits of higher CO2
cannot be achieved by farms experiencing nitrogen stress. Panel regressions and other statistical
methods have also identified statistically significant climate signals within reported yields (Lobell and
Burke, 2008; Schlenker and Roberts, 2009), with resulting models suggesting that climate changes
have already led to decreases in wheat and maize production since 1980 (Lobell et al., 2011).
Biophysical
Climate driver mechanism Overview of direct impact on agriculture
SAGAR SUNUWAR 45
productivity (Rosenzweig et al., 2014).
Elevated CO2 More efficient Plants in high-CO2 environments have more
water use efficient stomatal gas exchanges, which reduce
transpiration and improve water retention
(Deryng et al., 2016).
Elevated CO2 Reduction in Yield from crops in CO2-rich conditions contains
nutritional a lower percentage of key nutrients including
content protein, iron, and zinc (Mü ller et al., 2014;
Myers et al., 2014; Medek et al., 2017).
Decreased Increase in Excessive transpiration demand causes plants to
precipitation water stress and reduce gas exchanges for photosynthesis,
mortality conserving water at the expense of primary
production. Plant water loss can lead to wilting
and mortality.
Increased Reduction in Areas that regularly experience drought
precipitation water stress conditions likely stand to benefit should mean
precipitation increase.
More severe Plant damage High winds and hail can knock down, break, or
storms uproot crops, leading to potentially severe losses.
SAGAR SUNUWAR 46
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2007) defines adaptation as adjustments in natural or
human systems in response to actual or expected climatic stimuli or effects, which moderates harm or
exploits beneficial opportunities. It also refers to actions that people, countries, and societies take to
adjust to climate change that has occurred. Adaptation has three possible objectives: to reduce exposure
to the risk of damage; to develop the capacity to cope with unavoidable damages; and to take advantage
of new opportunities.
1.0 Crop adaptation strategies
1.1 Planting of drought resistant varieties of crops: Emphasis on more drought resistant crops in drought-
prone areas could help in reducing vulnerability to climate change.
1.2 Crop diversification: Diversification towards high value crops is feasible in the medium to long term.
Crop diversity is a high priority adaptation measure in both irrigated and non-irrigated areas.
1.3 Change in cropping pattern and calendar of planting: Climate change adversely affects crop
production through long-term alterations in rainfall resulting in changes in cropping pattern and calendar
of operations.
1.4 Mixed cropping: Mixed cropping involves growing two or more crops in proximity in the same field.
The system is commonly practised in Tanzania where cereals (maize, sorghum), legumes (beans) and
nuts (groundnuts) are grown together. The advantages of mixing crops with varying attributes are in
terms of maturity period (e.g. maize and beans), drought tolerance (maize and sorghum), input
requirements (cereals and legumes) and end users of the product (e.g. maize as food and sunflower for
cash). A research conducted by Mendelsohn et al. (2000) on analyzing adaptations made in Africa
reveals that in all countries apart from Cameroon and South Africa, the planting of different varieties of
the same crop is considered to be one of the most important adaptations. Different planting dates are also
considered an important adaptation in Egypt, Kenya and Senegal.
1.5 Improved irrigation efficiency: Success of climate change adaptation depends on availability of fresh
water in drought-prone areas. It should be emphasized that most adaptation methods provide benefits
even with the lower end of climate change scenarios, such as improved irrigation efficiency. As water
becomes a limiting factor, improved irrigation efficiency will become an important adaptation tool,
especially in dry season, because irrigation practices the for dry area are water intensive. Climate change
is expected to result in decreased fresh water availability (surface and groundwater) and reduced soil
moisture during the dry season, while the crop water demand is expected to increase because of
increased evapo-transpiration caused by climate change and the continuous introduction of high-yielding
varieties and intensive agriculture (Selvaraju et al., 2006). In Egypt, Kenya, and South Africa, significant
numbers of farmers have adapted by increased use of irrigation. In Gambia, South Africa, and Sudan,
farmers employ such adaptation measures as irrigation water transfer, water harvesting and storage to
cushion the effects of rainfall variability (Nkomo et al., 2005 and Osman et al. (2005). As temperature
increases, farmers tend to irrigate more frequently. Irrigation is clearly an adaptation strategy to
warming. When precipitation increases, they tend to irrigate less often and resort to natural rainfall more
often. Farms in the deserts reduce irrigation when temperature increases. Similarly, when precipitation
increases, farms close to the deserts increase irrigation.
1.6 Adopting soil conservation measures that conserve soil moisture: Soil conservation techniques are
increasingly practiced in Burkina Faso, Kenya, Senegal, and Niger. A study carried out by Lema and
Majule (2009) in Manyoni District of Tanzania revealed that farmers in Kamenyanga and Kintinku
ensure proper timing of different farming activities, burying of crop residues to replenish soil fertility,
burning crop residues to enhance quick release of nutrients and allowing livestock to graze on farmlands
after harvesting crops so as to improve soil organic matter. In Tanzania, farmers used contour ridges as a
strategy to minimize soil erosion to encourage better root penetration and enhance moisture conservation
(Lema and Majule, 2009). In Senegal and Burkina Faso, local farmers have improved their adaptive
capacity by using traditional pruning and fertilizing techniques to double tree densities in semi-arid
areas. These help in holding soils together and reversing desertification. Nyong et al. (2007) noted that
local farmers in the Sahel conserve carbon in soils through the use of zero tilling practices in cultivation,
mulching and other soil management techniques. Natural mulches moderate soil temperatures and
extremes, suppress diseases and harmful pests, and conserve soil moisture. Before the advent of
SAGAR SUNUWAR 47
chemical fertilizers, local farmers largely depended on organic farming, which also is capable of
reducing GHG emissions.
1.7 Planting of trees (afforestation) and agroforestry: Tree planting is the process of transplanting tree
seedlings, generally for forestry, land reclamation, or landscaping purposes. It differs from the
transplantation of larger trees in arboriculture, and from the lower cost but slower and less reliable
distribution of tree seeds. In silviculture the activity is known as reforestation, or afforestation,
depending on whether the area being planted has or has not recently been forested. It involves planting
seedlings over an area of land where the forest has been harvested or damaged by fire or disease or
insects. Rural farmers in most of the Africa countries have been planting trees as a way of adapting to
the effect of climate change. Agroforestry is a rational land-use planning system that tries to find some
balance in the raising of food crops and forests (Adesina et al., 1999). A practice similar to this has been
described in a part of south western part of Nigeria to raise shade tolerant crops, such as Dioscorea spp,
and cocoyam in essentially a permanent forest setting (Adesina, 1988). In addition to the fact that
agroforestry techniques can be perfected to cope with the new conditions that are anticipated under a
drier condition and a higher population density, they lead to an increase in the amount of organic matter
in the soil thereby improving agricultural productivity and reducing the pressure exerted on forests.
Inter-Governmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC):
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is an intergovernmental body of the United
Nations that is dedicated in providing the world with objective and scientific information relevant to
understand the scientific basis of the risk of human-induced climate change, its natural, political,
and economic impacts and risks, and possible response options.
The IPCC was established in 1988 by the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) and the United
Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)
The IPCC has adopted and published "Principles Governing IPCC Work", [7] which states that the IPCC
will assess:
Working Group I: Assesses scientific aspects of the climate system and climate change.
Working Group II: Assesses vulnerability of socio-economic and natural systems to climate
change, consequences, and adaptation options.
Working Group III: Assesses options for limiting greenhouse gas emissions and otherwise
mitigating climate change.
The IPCC has published five comprehensive assessment reports reviewing the latest climate science,
as well as a number of special reports on particular topics. These reports are prepared by teams of
relevant researchers selected by the Bureau from government nominations. Expert reviewers from a
wide range of governments, IPCC observer organizations and other organizations are invited at
different stages to comment on various aspects of the drafts.
UNFCC
The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) is an international
environmental treaty negotiated at the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development
(UNCED) informally known as the Earth Summit, held in Rio de Jenerio from 3 to 14 June 1992.
The objective of the treaty is to stabilize Greenhouse Gas (GHG) concentrations in the atmosphere at
a level that would prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system.
The UNFCCC was opened for signature on May 9, 1992 after an inter-governmental negotiating
committee produced the text of the framework convention as a report following its meeting in New
York from 30 April to 9 May 1992. It entered into force on 21 March 1994. As of March 2014,
UNFCCC has 196 parties. The treaty is aimed at stabilizing greenhouse gas concentrations in the
atmosphere at a level that would prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate
system-commonly believed to be around 20 C above the pre-industrial global average temperature.
Most countries are parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change
(UNFCCC). The ultimate objective of the UNFCCC is to stabilize atmospheric concentrations of the
GHGs at a level that would prevent dangerous human interference of the climate system. Scientific
analysis can provide information on the impacts of climate change, but deciding which impacts are
dangerous requires value judgment.
The UNFCCC has the ultimate objective of preventing dangerous anthropogenic (i. e. human)
interference of the climate system. As is stated in the article 2 of the convention, this requires that
Greenhouse Gas (GHGs) concentrations are stabilized in the atmosphere at a level where ecosystems
can adopt naturally to climate change, food production is not threatened and economic development
can proceed in a sustainable fashion.
SAGAR SUNUWAR 49
supplies such as food, building and clothing materials, fertilizers, metals, water and geothermal
power. For a long time, natural resources were the domain of the natural sciences.
Different Cultural Views about Nature:
Our view of nature and the environment are culturally bound
Western View of the Environment
Man as superior to other creatures.
God gave man dominion over plants and animals
Garden of Eden story
Implicit theory of stewardship but freedom to use nature to improve life
Non-Western View of the Environment
Man seen as part of nature, not separate from it or superior to it
Nature viewed in spiritual terms
Man shouldn’t seek to control nature but work with it, preserve it
Gods or spirits may inhabit nature
See change a cyclical rather than linear
Social responsibilities more important
Educated elites frequently share a more western view of the environment
Hindus worship various natural components as God, such as Surya Deva (Sun), Chandra
Deva (Moon), Jal Devata or Barun (water), Pipal tree, Tulsi (as the lord Bishnu), etc.
Various creatures are also worshipped in the Hindu tradition: Nag Devata (snake), Gau
Mata (cow as mother).
There is respectable place for various animals: dog, crow, ox, cow etc are treated with
respect in various Hindu festivals.
1. Renewable: resources that are available in infinite quantity and can be used repeatedly are
called renewable resources. Renewable resources can be replenished naturally. Some of these
resources, like sunlight, air, wind, water, etc. are continuously available and their quantities are
not noticeably affected by human consumption. Though many renewable resources do not
have such a rapid recovery rate, these resources are susceptible to depletion by over-use.
Resources from a human use perspective are classified as renewable so long as the rate of
replenishment/recovery exceeds that of the rate of consumption. They replenish easily
compared to non-renewable resources. Example: Forest, wind, water, etc.
2. Non-Renewable: resources that are limited in abundance due to their non-renewable nature
and whose availability may run out in the future are called non-renewable resources. on-
renewable resources either form slowly or do not naturally form in the environment. Minerals
are the most common resource included in this category. From the human perspective,
resources are non-renewable when their rate of consumption exceeds the rate of
replenishment/recovery; a good example of this are fossil fuels, which are in this category
because their rate of formation is extremely slow (potentially millions of years), meaning they
are considered non-renewable. Some resources naturally deplete in amount without human
interference, the most notable of these being radio-active elements such as uranium, which
naturally decay into heavy metals. Of these, the metallic minerals can be re-used by recycling
them, but coal and petroleum cannot be recycled. Once they are completely used they take
millions of years to replenish.Examples include fossil fuels, minerals, etc.Difference between
Renewable and Non-Renewable Resources
SAGAR SUNUWAR 50
Renewable resource Non-renewable resource
1. Air: Clean air is important for all the plants, animals, humans to survive on this planet. So, it is
necessary to take measures to reduce air pollution.
2. Water: 70% of the Earth is covered in water and only 2 % of that is freshwater. Initiative to
educate and regulate the use of water should be taken.
3. Soil: Soil is composed of various particles and nutrients. It helps plants grow.
4. Iron: It is made from silica and is used to build strong weapons, transportation and buildings
5. Forests: As the population increases, the demand for housing and construction projects also
increases. Forests provide clean air and preserve the ecology of the world.
The impact (I) of any population can be expressed as a product of three characteristics: the
population's size (P), its affluence or per-capita consumption (A), and the environmental damage (T)
inflicted by the technologies used to supply each unit of consumption (Ehrlich and Ehrlich 1990,
Ehrlich and Holdren 1971, Holdren and Ehrlich 1974).
I = PAT
These factors are not independent. For example, T varies as a nonlinear function of P, A, and rates of
change in both of these. This dependence is evident in the influence of population density and
economic activity on the choice of local and regional energy supply technologies (Holdren 1991a) and
on land management practices. Per-capita impact is generally higher in very poor as well as in affluent
societies.
In the I=PAT equation, the variable P represents the population of an area, such as the world. Since the
rise of industrial societies, human population has been increasing exponentially. This has
caused Thomas Malthus, Paul Ehrlich and many others to postulate that this growth would continue
until checked by widespread hunger and famine
The United Nations project that world population will increase from 7.7 billion today (2019) to 9.8
billion in 2050 and about 11.2 billion in 2100. These projections take into consideration that
population growth has slowed in recent years as women are having fewer children. This phenomenon
is the result of demographic transition all over the world. Although the UN projects that human
population may stabilize at around 11.2 billion in 2100, the I=PAT equation will continue to be
relevant for the increasing human impact on the environment in the short to mid-term future.
Environmental impacts of population
Increased population increases humans' environmental impact in many ways, which include but are
not limited to:
SAGAR SUNUWAR 51
Increased land use - Results in habitat loss for other species
Increased resource use - Results in changes in land cover
Increased pollution - Can cause sickness and damages ecosystems
Increased climate change
Increased biodiversity loss
Affluence
The variable A in the I=PAT equation stands for affluence. It represents the average consumption of
each person in the population. As the consumption of each person increases, the total environmental
impact increases as well. A common proxy for measuring consumption is through GDP per capita.
While GDP per capita measures production, it is often assumed that consumption increases when
production increases. GDP per capita has been rising steadily over the last few centuries and is driving
up human impact in the I=PAT equation.
Environmental impacts of affluence
Increased consumption significantly increases human environmental impact. This is because each
product consumed has wide-ranging effects on the environment. For example, the construction of a
car has the following environmental impacts:
Through out history, and especially during the twentieth century, environmental degradation has
primarily been a product of our efforts to secure improved standards of food, clothing, shelter,
comfort, and recreation for growing numbers of people. The magnitude of the threat to the ecosystem
is linked to human population size and resource use per person. Resource use, waste production and
environmental degradation are accelerated by population growth. They are further exacerbated by
consumption habits, certain technological developments, and particular patterns of social
organization and resource management.
SAGAR SUNUWAR 52
As human numbers further increase, the potential for irreversible changes of far reaching magnitude
also increases. Indicators of severe environmental stress include the growing loss of biodiversity,
increasing greenhouse gas emissions, increasing deforestation worldwide, stratospheric ozone
depletion, acid rain, loss of topsoil, and shortages of water, food, and fuel-wood in many parts of the
world.
While both developed and developing countries have contributed to global environmental problems,
developed countries with 85% percent of the gross world product and 23% of its population account
for the largest part of mineral and fossil-fuel consumption, resulting in significant environmental
impacts. With current technologies, present levels of consumption by the developed world are likely
to lead to serious negative consequences for all countries. This is especially apparent with the
increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide and trace gases that have accompanied industrialization,
which have the potential for changing global climate and raising sea level.
In both rich and poor countries, local environmental problems arise from direct pollution from energy
use and other industrial activities, inappropriate agricultural practices, population concentration,
inadequate environmental management, and inattention to environmental goals. When current
economic production has been the overriding priority and inadequate attention has been given to
environmental protection, local environmental damage has led to serious negative impacts on health
and major impediments to future economic growth. Restoring the environment, even where still
possible, is far more expensive and time consuming than managing it wisely in the first place; even
rich countries have difficulty in affording extensive environmental remediation efforts.
The relationships between human population, economic development, and the natural environment
are complex. Examination of local and regional case studies reveals the influence and interaction of
many variables. For example, environmental and economic impacts vary with population composition
and distribution, and with rural-urban and international migrations. Furthermore, poverty and lack of
economic opportunities stimulate faster population growth and increase incentives for environmental
degradation by encouraging exploitation of marginal resources.
Both developed and developing countries face a great dilemma in reorienting their productive
activities in the direction of a more harmonious interaction with nature. This challenge is accentuated
by the uneven stages of development. If all people of the world consumed fossil fuels and other
natural resources at the rate now characteristic of developed countries (and with current
technologies), this would greatly intensify our already unsustainable demands on the biosphere. Yet
development is a legitimate expectation of less developed and transitional countries. This can be
achieved, provided we are willing to undertake the requisite social change. Given time, political will,
and intelligent use of science and technology, human ingenuity can remove many constraints on
improving human welfare worldwide, finding substitutes for wasteful practices, and protecting the
natural environment.
Debates on Population Growth and Resource Scarcity:
Concerns about the balance between population and natural resources have existed ever since the
beginning of modern industrial expansion when, in 1798, they were articulately formulated by T. R.
Malthus (1766–1834) in the first edition of his An Essay on the Principle of Population. Malthus's
pessimistic conclusions–that "the power of population is indefinitely greater than the power in the
earth to produce subsistence for man" and that "this natural inequality … appears impossible in the
way to the perfectability of society"–have been surely among the most cited sentences of the
nineteenth and twentieth centuries.
The economist David Ricardo (1772–1823) raised another concern regarding agricultural resources
in The Principles of Political Economy and Taxation, published in 1817. He argued that the new land
brought into cultivation as population grows will be steadily less fertile, and thus its produce
increasingly costly.
Carrying Capacity:
The maximal population size of a given species that an area can support without reducing its ability to
support the same species in the future.
Carrying capacity is never static. It varies over time in response to gradual environmental changes,
perhaps associated with climatic change or the successional development of ecosystems. More rapid
changes in carrying capacity may be caused by disturbances of the habitat occurring because of a fire
or windstorm, or because of a human influence such as timber harvesting, pollution, or the
introduction of a non-native competitor, predator, or disease. Carrying capacity can also be damaged
by overpopulation, which leads to excessive exploitation of resources and a degradation of the
habitat’s ability to support the species.
In the standard ecological algebra, carrying capacity is represented by the constant K:
dN
dt [ ]
=rN 1−
N
K
Where;
N = population size,
r= maximum growth rate,
K= carrying capacity of the local environment, and
dN/dt=rate of change in population with time.
Carrying capacity is a function of characteristics of both the area and the organism.
Bio-Physical Carrying Capacity: The maximal population size that could be sustained biophysically
under given technological capabilities. When the population is at carrying capacity, there is no
fluctuation in the birth or death rates. But when there is an increase in the population size above the
carrying capacity, there is an overutilization of natural resources such as water, land, etc.
Also, there tends to be an increase in pollution-causing many environmental problems. Furthermore, this
increase leads to the spread of many diseases. These diseases cause health problems. It increases death
rates in comparison to birth rates.
Thus, the carrying capacity now becomes more as there is less consumption due to fewer births. This
causes the population to increase again. The cycle goes on and once at carrying capacity, stops changing.
Thus, the importance of such a regulating factor in the carrying capacity can be assessed. Thus, there
should be an adequate use of natural resources, proper treatment of sewage, proper disposal of waste.
Social Carrying Capacity: The maximum population that could be sustained under a specified social
system and its associated pattern of resource consumption. Social dimensions of carrying capacity
include lifestyle aspirations, epidemiological factors, and patterns of socially controlled resource
distribution, the disparity between private and social costs, the difficulty in formulating rational policy
in the face of uncertainty, and various other features of human sociopolitical and economic
organization.
SAGAR SUNUWAR 54
The term ‘cross-cultural’ refers to comparing or dealing with two or more different cultures.
Cultural values influence attitudes to environment.
Culture is an inescapable aspect of any human phenomenon, including how people shape
environments, use them and interact with them.
There is relationship between culture and nature as reflected in the traditions of a variety of
places.
Different cultures attach meanings to environment or nature in different ways.
Humans through their various actions have dramatically changed the Earth, and our attitudes
towards Nature, formed at least in part through acceptance of certain pieces of religious
doctrine, are largely responsible.
Environmental Politics:
Environment Equity
Environmental equity describes a country, or world, in which no single group or community faces
disadvantages in dealing with environmental hazards, disasters, or pollution. Ideally, no one should
need extreme wealth or political connections to protect the well-being of their families and
communities. Environmental equity is a basic human right.
According to the EPA, environmental equity can be broken down into two categories—fair treatment
and meaningful involvement. Fair treatment means that no single sect of the population should be
disproportionately affected by environmental crises as a result of laws or policies. Meaningful
involvement means that groups can offer input regarding decisions that affect their health or their
environment. This involvement also means that their input will be taken seriously and considered
when making said decisions. Additionally, lawmakers will actively seek feedback from affected
communities.
Environment Justice:
If environmental equity is a basic human right, environmental justice is the act of protecting that
right. Environment Justice: equitable distribution of environmental risks and benefits; fair and
meaningful participation in environmental decision-making; recognition of community ways of
life, local knowledge, and cultural difference; and the capability of communities and individuals to
function and flourish in society. An alternative meaning, used in social sciences, of the term "justice" is
"the distribution of social goods".
Environmental justice involves the actions and activism necessary to highlight inequities and level the
playing field. This means proper oversight and review of federal agencies, proper permitting and
licensing for companies, buildings, and warehouses that emit pollution, setting clear standards,
regulations, and laws that protect at-risk communities, and awarding grants to organizations that act
on behalf of these communities.
Equity is the outcome of environmental justice. An equitable society is one in which justice has been
served. They are complementary, not one in the same.
Environmental Myths:
SAGAR SUNUWAR 55
Myth 1: Packaging is bad. Because of state-of-the-art packaging, the United States wastes less food
than any part of the world except Africa.
Myth 2: Plastics are bad. Without the use of plastics, total use of packaging materials (measured by
weight) would increase four-fold, energy consumption would double and the garbage disposal would
increase more than double.
Myth 3: Disposables are bad. Careful studies show that disposables are not necessarily worse than
reusable or recyclable products. For example, aseptic juice boxes (which are usually disposed of, rather
than recycled) have a clear edge over their alternatives by most measures. Consumers who care mainly
about landfills may choose cloth diapers. But consumers who care more about air and water pollution and
conserving water and energy might choose disposables, which may also be preferable on the grounds of
health and convenience.
Myth 4: Recycling is always good. Recycling itself can cause environmental harm, e.g., more fuel
consumption and more air pollution. As a result, the environmental costs of recycling may exceed any
possible environmental benefits.
Myth 5: Recycling paper saves trees. Since most of the trees used to make paper are grown
explicitly for that purpose, if we use less paper, fewer trees will be planted and grown by commercial
harvesters. Recycling paper doesn't save trees, it reduces incentives to plant them.
Myth 6: We cannot safely dispose of solid waste. This was a valid concern in the past. In fact, 22
percent of Superfund sites (hazardous waste disposal areas) are former municipal landfills. But things
are different today. Government regulations and new technology permit the safe disposal of solid waste
-- in landfills or by waste-to-energy incineration --- without threat to human health or the environment.
Even without new improvements, the Environmental Protection Agency estimates that the aggregate
risk from all operating municipal solid waste landfills in the United States is one cancer death every 23
years.
Myth 7: We are running out of resources. Although all resources are finite, technology and markets
make it possible to use resources without exhausting them. That's why the international price of virtually
every raw material went down (reflecting abundance), not up (reflect ing scarcity) over the past decade.
Myth 8: Forests are in rapid decline.
Myth 9: Air quality is getting worse.
Myth 10: The Kyoto Protocol will successfully reduce levels of CO2 in the atmosphere.
Myth 11: All environmentalists are motivated by altruistic concern for the planet.
Myth 6: All environmentalists are peace loving and engage in traditional forms of civil disobedience.
Myth 7: Businesses are not hurt by onerous environmental regulations.
Myth 8: Oil can easily be replaced by renewable energy.
Myth 9: Genetically modified (GM) crops are "bad."
Myth 10: We are running out of freshwater
Development Narrative:
SAGAR SUNUWAR 56
Collier, P. Focus on those living in countries where the potential for growth is trapped.
The Bottom Engage a broader sweep of instruments beyond aid.
Billion
Sachs, J. Development aid should be large, focused, and integrated. Governance and
The End of institutions will develop as growth occurs.
Poverty
Easterly, W. Weak accountability means that the interventions of top-down planners tend to
The White fail.
Man’s Burden Be humble. Look for opportunities to support home-grown initiatives. Be
better at listening in- country. Support real accountability – for yourselves and for
others.
Chang, H-J. Rich countries want poor countries to do as they say, not as they did. Poor
Bad Samaritans countries need selective, strategic integration with world economy. Tilt the
playing field in favour of developing countries. Give them freer access to open
markets and Intellectual Property Rights (IPR).
Stiglitz, J. Fulfil G8 commitments; fairer trade; more open IPR; developed country
Making leadership on climate change; more responsible governance in North of
Globalization financial services, arms, narcotics.
Work Be more supportive of civil society to put more pressure on developed and
developing countries to make globalisation more inclusive.
SAGAR SUNUWAR 57
they said to be ignorant. Women's values centred around life-giving, must be re-valued, and elevated
from their subordinate role, women's knowledge from experience be recognized and respected.
Women largely absent from formal policy formulation and decision-making so involve women in such
field at all levels; integrate gender concerns in policies and programs; strengthen /establish
mechanisms at the national, regional and international level.
Ortner, an anthropologist, was one of the first to raise the question about the relationship between
women and nature in the title of her 1974 paper, "Is the female to male as nature is to culture?" Ortner
argues that women "seem to be" closer to nature, because of their biology, that is, their reproductive
functions. However, she maintains that "... it is not biology per se, but the social construction of it, that
places women closer to nature," (in Sayers 1982: 108). Thus, women are "perceived" to be inferior
because of their anatomy and inherent social roles (eg., childcare), which are largely undervalued by
society with its overriding emphasis on culture, on thought and technology.
Merchant (1980) describes two contrasting images of women and nature in pre-sixteenth century
Europe. The first and more dominant image was organic, based upon a culturally sanctioned respect
for the earth which was seen as a "nurturing mother." The second and opposing image saw nature as
wild, as disorder which needed to be controlled. This was reflected in the conceptualisation of women
as witches who "raised storms, caused illness, destroyed crops...and killed infants," (Merchant 1980:
127 in Jackson 1993: 390) and were therefore unjustly tried and usually burnt alive.
Vandana Shiva (1989) identifies colonialism as the starting point for the exploitation and control of
women and nature in the Indian context. She argues that the model of development imposed by
imperialism marked a radical shift from the traditional Indian cosmological view of nature as
"Prakriti," a living and creative process based upon the feminine principle of "Shakti" (female energy).
Together with "Purusha," the masculine principle, it created the world. Thus, for women "...the death
of Prakriti is simultaneously a beginning of their marginalisation, devaluation, displacement and
ultimate dispensability. The ecological crisis is, at its root, the death of the feminine principle," (Shiva
1989: 42).
According to Shiva, this relationship is based on shared similarities, that is both women and nature
create and sustain life and both (in India) have suffered the impact of colonisation and post-colonial
development.
Environmental Movement:
A political movement that focuses on protecting the environment, reducing environmental damage
(such as pollution), and reducing unsustainable use of natural resources.
History of Environmental Movement:
The origins of the environmental movement lay in response to increasing levels of smoke pollution in
the atmosphere during the Industrial Revolution. The emergence of great factories and the
concomitant immense growth in coal consumption gave rise to an unprecedented level of air
pollution in industrial centers; after 1900 the large volume of industrial chemical discharges added to
the growing load of untreated human waste.[2] Under increasing political pressure from the urban
middle-class, the first large-scale, modern environmental laws came in the form of Britain's Alkali
Acts, passed in 1863, to regulate the deleterious air pollution (gaseous hydrochloric acid) given off by
the Leblanc process, used to produce soda ash.
In 1916, the National Park Service was founded by U.S. President Woodrow Wilson. Pioneers of the
movement called for more efficient and professional management of natural resources. They fought
for reform because they believed the destruction of forests, fertile soil, minerals, wildlife, and water
resources would lead to the downfall of society. The group that has been the most active in recent
years is the climate movement.
in the 1940s, Aldo Leopold wrote "A Sand County Almanac". He believed in a land ethic that
recognized that maintaining the "beauty, integrity, and health of natural systems" as a moral and
ethical imperative.
1962 - Rachel Carson publishes "Silent Spring". This book brought together research on toxicology,
ecology and epidemiology to suggest that agricultural pesticides were building to catastrophic levels.
SAGAR SUNUWAR 58
This was linked to damage to animal species and to human health. It shattered the assumption that
the environment had an infinite capacity to absorb pollutants.
1968 - Paul Ehrlich publishes book "Population Bomb" on the connection between human population,
resource exploitation and the environment.
1968 - The Club of Rome, led by Italian industrialist Aurrelio Peccei and Scottish scientist Alexander
King, is established by 36 European economists and scientists. Its goal is to pursue a holistic
understanding of and solutions to the 'world problematique'. It commissions a study of global
proportions to model and analyze the dynamic interactions between industrial production,
population, environmental damage, food consumption and natural resource usage.
1968 - The UN General Assembly authorizes the Human Environment Conference to be held in 1972.
1969 - Friends of the Earth forms as a non-profit advocacy organization dedicated to protecting the
planet from environmental degradation; preserving biological, cultural, and ethnic diversity; and
empowering citizens to have an influential voice in decisions affecting the quality of their
environment -- and their lives.
Beginning in 1969 and continuing into the 1970s, Illinois-based environmental activist James F.
Phillips engaged in numerous covert anti-pollution campaigns using the pseudonym "the Fox." His
activities included plugging illegal sewage outfall pipes and dumping toxic wastewater produced by
a US Steel factory inside the company's Chicago corporate office. Phillips' "ecotage" campaigns
attracted considerable media attention and subsequently inspired other direct action protests against
environmental destruction.
1970 - First Earth Day held as a national teach-in on the environment. An estimated twenty million
people participated in peaceful demonstrations all across the USA.
1971 - Greenpeace starts up in Canada and launches an aggressive agenda to stop environmental
damage through civil protests and non-violent interference.
1972 - Rene Dubos and Barbara Ward write "Only One Earth". The book sounds an urgent alarm about
the impact of human activity on the biosphere but also expresses optimism that a shared concern for
the future of the planet could lead humankind to create a common future.
1972 - United Nations Conference on Human Environment held in Stockholm under the leadership of
Maurice Strong. The conference is rooted in the regional pollution and acid rain problems of northern
Europe. This eco-agenda is opposed by the Group of 77 and the Eastern bloc. Nevertheless, it provides
the first international recognition of environmental issues. The concept of sustainable development is
cohesively argued to present a satisfactory resolution to the environmental vs. development dilemma.
The conference leads to the establishment of numerous national environmental protection agencies
and the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP).
By the mid-1970s anti-nuclear activism had moved beyond local protests and politics to gain a wider
appeal and influence.
1972 - Club of Rome publishes "Limits to Growth". The report is extremely controversial because it
predicts dire consequences if growth is not slowed. Northern countries criticize the report for not
including technological solutions while Southern countries are incensed because it advocates
abandonment of economic development. The ensuing debate heightens awareness of the
interconnections between several well-known global problems.
1973 - Chipko Movement born in India in response to deforestation and environmental degradation.
The actions of the women of the community influenced both forestry and women's participation in
environmental issues.
1977 - Greenbelt Movement starts in Kenya. It is based on community tree-planting to prevent
desertification.
1980 - US President Jimmy Carter authorizes study which led to the "Global 2000" report. This report
recognizes biodiversity for the first time as a critical characteristic in the proper functioning of the
planetary ecosystem. It further asserts that the robust nature of ecosystems is weakened by species
extinction.
1983 - World Commission on Environment and Development forms. Chaired by Norwegian Prime
Minister Gro Harlem Brundtland, the commission works for three years to weave together a report on
social, economic, cultural, and environmental issues.
1983 - Development Alternatives is established in India as a non-profit research, development and
consultancy organization. It fosters a new relationship between people, technology and the
environment in the South in order to attain the goal of sustainable development.
1984 - Worldwatch Institute publishes its first State of the World Report. The report monitors
changes in the global resource base, focusing particularly on how changes there affect the economy. It
concludes that "we are living beyond our means, largely by borrowing against the future."
1986 - IUCN Conference on Environment and Development held in Ottawa. Meeting participants
define sustainable development as the emerging paradigm derived from two closely related
paradigms of conservation 1) one reacting against the laissez-faire economic theory which considers
living resources as externalities and free goods and 2) one based on the concept of resource
stewardship
1987 - "Our Common Future" (Brundtland Report) published. It ties problems together and, for the
first time, gives some direction for comprehensive global solutions. It also popularizes the term
"sustainable development".
1987 - Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer is adopted.
1988 - Inter-governmental Panel on Climate Change established with three working groups to assess
the most up-to-date scientific, technical and socio-economic research in the field of climate change.
1992 - U.N. Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) held in Rio de Janeiro. It results in
the publication of Agenda 21, the Convention on Biological Diversity, the Framework Convention on
Climate Change, the Rio Declaration, and a statement of non-binding Forest Principles. The parallel
NGO Forum signs a full set of alternative treaties.
Ecofeminism:
Eco feminism is a social and political movement, attempts to unite environmentalism and feminism
with some currents linking deep ecology and feminism
Ecofeminists argue that the capitalist and patriarchal system is based on triple domination of the
people of Third World, women, and nature
Belief that the social mentality that leads to the domination and oppression of women is directly
connected to the social mentality that leads to the abuse of the environment
Ecofeminism, or ecological feminism, is a term coined in 1974 by Françoise d'Eaubonne .
Ecofeminist analysis explores the connections between women and nature in culture, religion,
literature and iconography, and addresses the parallels between the oppression of nature and the
oppression of women. There are different types of eco feminism which focus on areas such as
economics, spirituality, colonization, class struggle or racism.These parallels include but are not
limited to seeing women and nature as property, seeing men as the curators of culture and women as
the curators of nature, and how men dominate women and humans dominate nature. Ecofeminism
emphasizes that both women and nature must be respected. Though the scope of ecofeminist analysis
SAGAR SUNUWAR 60
is broad and dynamic, American author and ecofeminist Charlene Spretnak has offered one way of
categorizing ecofeminist work: 1) through the study of political theory as well as history; 2) through
the belief and study of nature-based religions; 3) through environmentalism.
Eco feminism basically has two grounds; One women are nearer to nature & contributing for nature
while man are exploiting nature; another The social mentality that leads to the domination and
oppression of women is directly connected to the social mentality that leads to the abuse of the
environment’
Eco feminists also criticize Western lifestyle choices, such as consuming food that has travelled
thousands of miles and playing sports (golf) which require ecological destruction.
Ecofeminism do share a commitment to developing ethics which do not sanction or encourage either
the domination of any group of humans or the abuse of nature.
Ecofeminist theory asserts that capitalism reflects only paternalistic and patriarchal values. This
notion implies that the effects of capitalism have not benefited women and has led to a harmful split
between nature and culture. In the 1970s, early ecofeminists discussed that the split can only be
healed by the feminine instinct for nurture and holistic knowledge of nature's processes.
Vandana Shiva wrote that women have a special connection to the environment through their daily
interactions and that this connection has been underestimated. According to Shiva, women in
subsistence economies who produce "wealth in partnership with nature, have been experts in their
own right of holistic and ecological knowledge of nature's processes". She makes the point that "these
alternative modes of knowing, which are oriented to the social benefits and sustenance needs are not
recognized by the capitalist reductionist paradigm, because it fails to perceive the interconnectedness
of nature, or the connection of women's lives, work and knowledge with the creation of wealth". Shiva
blames this failure on the Western patriarchal perceptions of development and progress. According to
Shiva, patriarchy has labeled women, nature, and other groups not growing the economy as
"unproductive".
Ecofeminists argue that the capitalist and patriarchal systems that predominate throughout the
world reveal a triple domination of the Global South (people who live in the Third World), women,
and nature.
This domination and exploitation of women, of poorly resourced peoples and of nature sits at the
core of the ecofeminist analysis.
SAGAR SUNUWAR 61
One of the major results of the Stockholm conference was the creation of the United Nations
Environment Programme (UNEP).
Principles of the Stockholm Declaration:
1. Human rights must be asserted, apartheid and colonialism condemned
2. Natural resources must be safeguarded
3. The Earth's capacity to produce renewable resources must be maintained
4. Wildlife must be safeguarded
5. Non-renewable resources must be shared and not exhausted
6. Pollution must not exceed the environment's capacity to clean itself
7. Damaging oceanic pollution must be prevented
8. Development is needed to improve the environment
9. Developing countries therefore need assistance
10. Developing countries need reasonable prices for exports to carry out environmental
management
11. Environment policy must not hamper development
12. Developing countries need money to develop environmental safeguards
13. Integrated development planning is needed
14. Rational planning should resolve conflicts between environment and development
15. Human settlements must be planned to eliminate environmental problems
16. Governments should plan their own appropriate population policies
17. National institutions must plan development of states' natural resources
18. Science and technology must be used to improve the environment
19. Environmental education is essential
20. Environmental research must be promoted, particularly in developing countries
21. States may exploit their resources as they wish but must not endanger others
22. Compensation is due to states thus endangered
23. Each nation must establish its own standards
24. There must be cooperation on international issues
25. International organizations should help to improve the environment
26. Weapons of mass destruction must be eliminated
Achievements:
The Stockholm Conference motivated countries around the world to monitor environmental
conditions as well as to create environmental ministries and agencies. Despite these institutional
accomplishments, including the establishment of UNEP, the failure to implement most of its action
programme has prompted the UN to have follow-up conferences. The succeeding United Nations
Conference on Environment and Development convened in Rio de Janeiro in 1992 (the Rio Earth
Summit), the 2002 World Summit on Sustainable Development in Johannesburg and the 2012 United
Nations Conference on Sustainable Development (Rio+20) all take their starting point in the
declaration of the Stockholm Conference.
Some argue that this conference, and more importantly the scientific conferences preceding it, had a
real impact on the environmental policies of the European Community (that later became
the European Union). For example, in 1973, the EU created the Environmental and Consumer
Protection Directorate, and composed the first Environmental Action Program. Such increased
interest and research collaboration arguably paved the way for further understanding of global
warming, which has led to such agreements as the Kyoto Protocol and the Paris Agreement, and has
given a foundation of modern environmentalism.
SAGAR SUNUWAR 63
The Brundtland Commission's mandate was to:
SAGAR SUNUWAR 64
alternative sources of energy to replace the use of fossil fuels which delegates linked to global climate
change
new reliance on public transportation systems in order to reduce vehicle emissions, congestion in
cities and the health problems caused by polluted air and smoke
the growing usage and limited supply of water
Achievements:
1. Agenda 21: Agenda 21 is a non-binding action plan of the United Nations with
regard to sustainable development. Agenda 21 is grouped into 4 sections:
Section I: Social and Economic Dimensions is directed toward combating poverty, especially
in developing countries, changing consumption patterns, promoting health, achieving a more
sustainable population, and sustainable settlement in decision making.
Section II: Conservation and Management of Resources for Development includes atmospheric
protection, combating deforestation, protecting fragile environments, conservation of biological
diversity (biodiversity), control of pollution and the management of biotechnology, and radioactive
wastes.
Section III: Strengthening the Role of Major Groups includes the roles of children and youth,
women, NGOs, local authorities, business and industry, and workers; and strengthening the role
of indigenous peoples, their communities, and farmers.
Section IV: Means of Implementation includes science, technology transfer, education, international
institutions, and financial mechanisms.
2. The Rio Declaration on Environment and Development: It consisted 27
principles intended to guide countries in future sustainable development.
3. An important achievement of the summit was an agreement on the Climate
Change Convention which in turn led to the Kyoto Protocol and the Paris
Agreement. Another agreement was to "not to carry out any activities on the
lands of indigenous peoples that would cause environmental degradation or that
would be culturally inappropriate".
4. Moreover, important legally binding agreements (Rio Convention) were opened
for signature:
Convention on Biological Diversity
Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)
United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification
5. Forest Principles
6. The 'Earth Summit' also led to the creation of the Commission on Sustainable
Development
World Summit on Sustainable Development:
The World Summit on Sustainable Development (WSSD) or Earth Summit 2002 was held in
Johannesburg, South Africa, from 26 August to 4 September 2002. The World Summit on Sustainable
Development was also known as Earth Summit II or Rio +10 which was organised after 10 years of the
first Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro to develop consensus on the sustainable development by the
United Nations. It was convened to discuss sustainable development by the United Nations. It was
organized10 years after the first Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro.
The summit focused the world's attention toward meeting difficult challenges, including
improving people's lives and conserving natural resources, with ever-increasing demands for food,
water, shelter, sanitation, energy, health services and economic security.
Outcomes of World Summit on Sustainable Development:
1. The Summit set the priorities for the detailing of the implementation plan and actions for the
countries on way of sustainability.
SAGAR SUNUWAR 65
2. The Summit gives a political statement in the form of a "Johannesburg Declaration", to be agreed by
world leaders, reaffirming their commitment to work towards sustainable development.
3. The Summit will serve as a platform for the launch of new partnership initiatives known as "Type 2"
outcomes -- by and between governments, NGOs and businesses, to tackle specific problems and
achieve measurable results.
The Earth Summit II or Rio +10 made the commitment to be one of the largest and important global
meetings ever held on the integration of economic, environmental and social decision-making. It will
focus on building a commitment at the highest levels of government and society to better implement
Agenda 21, the roadmap for achieving sustainable development adopted at the 1992 United Nations
Conference on Environment and Development -- the "Earth Summit" -- held in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Rio +20
Overview
The United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development (Rio+20) was held in Rio de Janeiro,
Brazil on 20 to 22 June 2012. It resulted in a focused political outcome document which contains clear
and practical measures for implementing sustainable development.
In Rio, Member States decided to launch a process to develop a set of Sustainable Development Goals
(SDGs), which will build upon the Millennium Development Goals and converge with the post 2015
development agenda. Rio+20 was one of the biggest international gatherings of 2012, and the largest
event in the history of the United Nations. It presented an opportunity to re-direct and re-energise
political commitment to the three dimensions of sustainable development: economic growth, social
improvement and environmental protection.
Objectives (3)
1. Securing renewed political commitment for sustainable development.
2. Assessing the progress and implementation gaps in meeting previous commitments.
3. Addressing new and emerging challenges.
SAGAR SUNUWAR 66
Kyoto Protocol:
Kyoto Protocol is a global Agreement that set targets for reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
The Protocol was adopted by Parties to the UNFCCC in 1997 in Kyoto, Japan, and entered into force in
2005. Kyoto Protocol aimed at combating global warming. The Kyoto Protocol is a agreement under
which industrialized countries will reduce their collective emissions of greenhouse gases by 5.2%
compared to the year 1990. The Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on
Climate Change (UNFCCC) is an international treaty that sets binding obligations on industrialized
countries to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases. The Kyoto Protocol applies to the six greenhouse
gases listed in Annex A: carbon dioxide (CO2), Methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons
(HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6).
The Protocol operationalised the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change
(UNFCCC). 192 nations committed to reducing their emissions by an average of 5.2% by 2012, which
would represent about 29% of the world’s total emissions. Countries that ratified the Kyoto Protocol
were assigned maximum carbon emission levels for specific periods and participated in carbon credit
trading. If a country emitted more than its assigned limit, then it would receive a lower emissions limit
Recognising that developed countries are principally responsible for the current levels of GHG
emissions as a result of more than 150 years of unmitigated industrial activity, the Protocol placed a
heavier burden on them. 37 industrialised nations plus the EU were mandated to cut their GHG
emissions, while developing countries were asked to voluntarily comply; more than 100 developing
countries, including China and India, were exempted from the treaty.
The Protocol separated countries into two groups: Annex I contained developed nations, and Non-
Annex I contained developing countries. Emission limits were placed on Annex I countries only. Non-
Annex I countries could invest in projects to lower emissions in their countries. For these projects,
developing countries earned carbon credits that they could trade or sell to developed countries,
allowing the developing nations a higher level of maximum carbon emissions for that period. This
SAGAR SUNUWAR 67
The Protocol established a monitoring, review and verification system, as well as a compliance system
to ensure transparency and hold parties accountable. All countries’ emissions had to be monitored
2. The Clean development mechanism, CDM – it is a project-based mechanism that feeds the
carbon market and involves investment in sustainable development projects that reduce
emissions in developing countries.
International Emissions Trading: Emissions trading, as set out in Article 17 of the Kyoto Protocol,
allows countries that have emission units to spare - emissions permitted them but not "used" - to sell
this excess capacity to countries that are over their targets. Thus, a new commodity was created in the
form of emission reductions or removals. Since carbon dioxide is the principal greenhouse gas, people
speak simply of trading in carbon. Carbon is now tracked and traded like any other commodity. This is
known as the "carbon market." More than actual emissions units can be traded and sold under the
Kyoto Protocols emissions trading scheme.
The other units which may be transferred under the scheme, each equal to one tonne of CO2, may be
in the form of:
SAGAR SUNUWAR 68
A removal unit (RMU) on the basis of land use, land-use change and forestry
(LULUCF) activities such as reforestation
An emission reduction unit (ERU) generated by a joint implementation project
A certified emission reduction (CER) generated from a clean development mechanismproject
activity
Clean Development Mechanism (CDM): The Clean Development Mechanism (CDM), defined in Article
12 of the Protocol, allows a country to implement an emission-reduction project in developing
countries. Such projects can earn saleable certified emission reduction (CER) credits, each equivalent
to one tonne of CO2, which can be counted towards meeting Kyoto targets. The mechanism is seen by
many as a pioneer. It is the first global, environmental investment and credit scheme of its kind,
providing a standardized emissions offset instrument, CERs. A CDM project activity might involve, for
example, a rural electrification project using solar panels or the installation of more energy-efficient
boilers. The mechanism stimulates sustainable development and emission reductions. A CDM project
must provide emission reductions. The projects must qualify through a rigorous and public
registration and issuance process.
SAGAR SUNUWAR 69
CDM and JI are the two project-based mechanisms which feed the carbon market. The CDM involves
investment in emission reduction or removal enhancement projects in developing countries that
contribute to their sustainable development, while JI enables developed countries to carry out
emission reduction or removal enhancement projects in other developed countries.
After the first commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol ended in December 2012, parties to the
Protocol met in Doha, Qatar, to discuss an amendment to the original Kyoto agreement. The Doha
Amendment added new targets for the second commitment period, 2012-2020, for participating
countries, during which time parties committed to reduce GHG emissions by at least 18% below 1990
levels
This was short-lived; in 2015, all UNFCCC participants signed another pact, the Paris Climate
Registry systems track and record transactions by Parties under the mechanisms. The UN Climate
Change Secretariat, based in Bonn, Germany, keeps an international transaction log to verify that
transactions are consistent with the rules of the Protocol.
Reporting is done by Parties by submitting annual emission inventories and national reports under
the Protocol at regular intervals.
A compliance system ensures that Parties are meeting their commitments and helps them to meet
their commitments if they have problems doing so.
Adaptation
The Kyoto Protocol, like the Convention, is also designed to assist countries in adapting to the adverse
SAGAR SUNUWAR 70
effects of climate change. It facilitates the development and deployment of technologies that can help
increase resilience to the impacts of climate change.
The Adaptation Fund was established to finance adaptation projects and programmes in developing
countries that are Parties to the Kyoto Protocol. In the first commitment period, the Fund was
financed mainly with a share of proceeds from CDM project activities. In Doha, in 2012, it was decided
that for the second commitment period, international emissions trading and joint implementation
would also provide the Adaptation Fund with a 2 percent share of proceeds.
6. Air: Clean air is important for all the plants, animals, humans to survive on this planet. So, it is
necessary to take measures to reduce air pollution.
7. Water: 70% of the Earth is covered in water and only 2 % of that is freshwater. Initiative to
educate and regulate the use of water should be taken.
8. Soil: Soil is composed of various particles and nutrients. It helps plants grow.
9. Iron: It is made from silica and is used to build strong weapons, transportation and buildings
10. Forests: As the population increases, the demand for housing and construction projects also
increases. Forests provide clean air and preserve the ecology of the world.
SAGAR SUNUWAR 72
that there was even a possibility of conflict between the goals of poverty alleviation and
environmental protection.
The environment-poverty nexus is a two-way relationship. Environment affects poverty situations in
three distinct dimensions:
i. by taking sources of livelihoods of poor people,
ii. by affecting their health and
iii. by influencing their vulnerability.
On the other hand, poverty also affects environment in various ways:
i. by forcing poor people to degrade environment,
ii. by encouraging countries to promote economic growth at the expense of environment, and
iii. by inducing societies to downgrade environmental concerns, including failing to channel
resources to address such concerns.
Effect of Poverty on Environment:
One such problem is a lack of access to properly sanitized facilities. More than a third of the
world’s population does not have adequate bathrooms. They have no choice other than to use outdoor
fields and streams for elimination. The result is that over a billion people obtain water from sources
that are contaminated from human and animal waste. A second problem would be malnutrition.
People living in poverty stricken environments do not receive sufficient amount of nutrients for
proper health. Many of these people die at a young age from normally treatable illnesses. The third
most common problem is respiratory illness. In poorer areas people rely on burning wood or coal
within their own homes as a means of cooking or just staying warm. Such actions lead them to breathe
in high concentrations of indoor air pollutants. The World Health Organization states that about seven
million people die each year from these conditions. About two thirds of these people are children
under the age of five.
Poverty among people puts stress on the environment whereas environmental problems cause severe
suffering to the poor. People, whether they be rich or poor, consume water, food, and natural
resources in order to remain alive. All economic activities are directly, indirectly or remotely based on
natural resources and any pressure on natural resources can cause environmental stress.
SAGAR SUNUWAR 73
Environmental damage can prevent people, especially the poor, from having good and hygienic living
standards. As poor people rely more directly on the environment than the rich for their survival, they
are mostly on the receiving end of environmental problems
Poverty often causes people to put relatively more pressure on the environment which results in
larger families (due to high death rates and insecurity), improper human waste disposal leading to
unhealthy living conditions, more pressure on fragile land to meet their needs, overexploitation of
natural resources and more deforestation. Insufficient knowledge about agricultural practices can also
lead to a decline in crop yield and productivity etc.
One of the biggest ways that the environment is affected by poverty is through deforestation. Forests
provide the world with clean air, in addition to working as “sink holes” that help reduce the drastic
climate changes seen in the world today. With the increasing level of deforestation taking place, the
environment is taking a heavy blow and finding it difficult to recover. Impoverished communities,
unaware of the errant, harmful ways in which they use natural resources, such as forest wood and
soil, are continuing the destructive cycle that spirals the environment further downward.
Because extreme poverty doesn’t always lend to widespread birth education, many poor women lack
the resources necessary to engage in birth control. Therefore, it is common for poor women to
continue having children well after they would have liked because of little to no access to resources
and education.
The more the global population grows, the more weight is placed on the environment. Every human
being consumes their share of resources from the environment, and with so many births originating
from poor communities, the burdens placed on the environment grow heavier and heavier each day.
A number of studies have been carried out on how both poverty and wealth have impacted on the
environment, resulting in a number of environmental threats such as degradation of the soil, water
and marine resources which are essential for life supporting systems, pollution which is becoming
health threatening, loss of biodiversity and global climatic changes which jeopardize the very
existence of life on the planet.
SAGAR SUNUWAR 74
Affluence affects the environment both positively and negatively. However, the negative effects of
affluence on the environment are far greater than those caused by poverty. People who live in well-
developed areas such Europe, Canada, and the US, or rapidly developing areas such as China and India
exist in high consumer societies. Such a lifestyle leads to unnecessary depletion of resources. Such
affluence has terrible consequences for the environment. G. Tyler Miller and Scott E. Spoolman give us
a more specific example of this disparity. “While the United States has far fewer people than India, the
average American consumes about 30 times as much as the average citizen of India and 100 times as
much as the average person in the world’s poorest countries.” The environmental impact caused by
one person in the US is far greater the average environmental impact caused by someone in an
undeveloped country.
The flip side is that affluence can also be a source of help for the environment. People living in
well-developed societies have the luxury to be more concerned about environmental impact. Affluent
societies have the financial means to invest in technological research that can reduce pollution and
other forms of consumer waste. Wealthier nations tend to have cleaner air and water. The food
supplies are also better sanitized which leads to longer life spans. Money has the power to improve
environmental status since it can finance scientific research. Wealthier societies also generally have
higher levels of education, which encourages people to demand that governments and corporations be
more environmentally friendly.
Food Security
Food security is defined as the availability of food and one's access to it. A household is considered
food secure when its occupants do not live in hunger or fear of starvation. The World Food Summit of
1996 defined food security as existing "when all people at all times have access to sufficient, safe,
nutritious food to maintain a healthy and active life".
Commonly, the concept of food security is defined as including both physical and economic access to
food that meets people's dietary needs as well as their food preferences. Household food security
exists when all members have access to enough food for an active, healthy life. Food security
incorporates a measure of resilience to future disruption or unavailability of critical food supply due
to various risk factors including droughts, shipping disruptions, fuel shortages, economic instability,
and wars.
SAGAR SUNUWAR 75
b. Food distribution: It involves the storage, processing, transport, packaging, and marketing of
food. Food-chain infrastructure and storage technologies on farms can also affect the amount
of food wasted in the distribution process. Poor transport infrastructure can increase the price
of supplying water and fertilizer as well as the price of moving food to national and global
markets. Around the world, few individuals or households are continuously self-reliant for
food. This creates the need for a bartering, exchange, or cash economy to acquire food.
c. Exchange of Food: It requires efficient trading systems and market institutions, which can
affect food security. Per capita world food supplies are more than adequate to provide food
security to all, and thus food accessibility is a greater barrier to achieving food security.
2. Access
Food access refers to the affordability and allocation of food, as well as the preferences of individuals
and households. The UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights noted that the causes
of hunger and malnutrition are often not a scarcity of food but an inability to access available food,
usually due to poverty. Poverty can limit access to food, and can also increase how vulnerable an
individual or household is to food price spikes. Access depends on whether the household has enough
income to purchase food at prevailing prices or has sufficient land and other resources to grow its
own food. Households with enough resources can overcome unstable harvests and local
food shortages and maintain their access to food. There are two distinct types of access to food:
a. Direct access: A household produces food using human and material resources.
b. Economic access: A household purchases food produced elsewhere.
Location can affect access to food and which type of access a family will rely on. The assets of a
household, including income, land, products of labor, inheritances, and gifts can also determine
a household's access to food.
3. Utilization
It refers to the metabolism of food by individuals. Once food is obtained by a household, a variety of
factors affect the quantity and quality of food that reaches members of the household. In order to
achieve food security, the food ingested must be safe and must be enough to meet the physiological
requirements of each individual.
4. Stability
Food stability refers to the ability to obtain food over time. Food insecurity can be transitory, seasonal,
or chronic.
a. Transitory food insecurity: In this food insecurity food may be unavailable during certain
periods of time. At the food production level, natural disasters and drought result in crop
failure and decreased food availability. Civil conflicts can also decrease access to food.
Instability in markets resulting in food-price spikes can cause transitory food insecurity. Other
factors that can temporarily cause food insecurity are loss of employment or productivity,
which can be caused by illness.
b. Seasonal food: This insecurity can result from the regular pattern of growing seasons in food
production.
c. Chronic (or permanent) food insecurity: It is defined as the long-term, persistent lack of
adequate food. In this case, households are constantly at risk of being unable to acquire food to
meet the needs of all members. Chronic and transitory food insecurity are linked, since the
reoccurrence of transitory food security can make households more vulnerable to chronic food
insecurity.
SAGAR SUNUWAR 76
Gender inequalities, patriarchal norms, low social status, and lack of access to resources leads to
lower access to food and nutrition security among girls and women. Similarly, children, pregnant
women, lactating and nursing mothers will have specialised needs for food and nutrition. This is
not explicitly addressed while discussing food and nutrition security.
Traditionally, women are relegated to the role of caregiver and food manager in a household.
Women often allocate meals to others before themselves, hampering their own food intake. An
increase in family members owing to reverse migration from urban to rural or foreign migrants
has added the fear of placing lesser food on women’s plates given the fixed size of food
availability.
Women in agriculture comprise 57.2 percent of the total labour employed. But the contribution of
women in food production and security is hardly recognised due to the predominance of the
patriarchal norms, inequalities in land ownership, access and control of livelihood assets and poor
decision-making status. The situation has worsened now because the extension of the lockdown
during peak harvesting season resulted in the shortage of seeds, fertilisers and agricultural inputs
which may hinder agriculture production domestically.
Apart from this, children, pregnant women and lactating and nursing mothers who have
specialised needs for food and nutrition will suffer the most given the present situation. According
to 2016’s demographic and health survey, 17 percent of women of reproductive age are thin or
undernourished. If the women of reproductive age or lactating mothers and their children do not
get adequate nutrition, cases of malnutrition will increase. The scarring effects of malnutrition will
remain for a more extended period in life, and reversing the impact of malnutrition can be very
costly, if not impossible. Similarly, female-headed households are generally food insecure due to
disadvantages regarding access to land, labour market, access to credit, discriminating cultural
norms, restricted mobility and ‘double day burden’ on their heads.
Women’s access to adequate food security, both for themselves and their families is dependent,
not only on their economic status, but on their own health, education and social status within the
family and in society. Women with low status tend to have weaker control over household
resources, tighter time constraints, less access to information and health services, poorer mental
health and lower self esteem. These factors are thought to be closely tied to woman’s own
nutritional status and the quality of care they receive and in turn to children’s birth weights and
the quality of care they receive
Gender inequality is one of the drivers of food insecurity, as the consistent social and economic
marginalization of women and girls results in lower access to food and less autonomy to make the
right choices regarding feeding and care giving practices. Women in Nepal have on average less
access to education and employment opportunities, and less control over productive resources
than do men. In addition, women’s ownership of key resources like land and housing, and their
decision-making power within the household has traditionally been limited. Though officially
outlawed and punishable by fines and imprisonment, practices such as chhaupadi, the physical
isolation of women and girls during menstruation, persist in parts of the country. These practices
also deny women and girls a nutritious diet during this period, exacerbating nutrition-related
health issues. There has been some gradual progress made in evening out this gender imbalance.
The gender gaps in education, health and in political representation have improved over time.
Women’s ownership of fixed assets increased to about 20 % from 10.8 % in 2001. These advances
have signaled a lowering of gender inequalities, although stark regional disparities still exist.
The present situation of food insecurity is the manifestation of the structural inequalities and
discrimination faced by women. The intersectionality of women and caste, class and geographical
locations further intensifies problems faced by women. Hence, addressing women’s food
insecurity should be seen from the perspective of gender empowerment. To address the food
insecurity arising from the current pandemic, targeted nutritional and food stamps should be
provided to pregnant and lactating women, widows, and single women. Similarly, priority women
at local level employment programmes and a smooth supply of essential foods can be some areas
SAGAR SUNUWAR 77
where between different levels of government coordinate with each other. It is imperative to have
universal as well as targeted policies and programmes to address gender-specific food insecurity.
Identifying Affected Groups: SIA helps in identifying people and groups who affect or are
affected by the project
Allying Fears and Winning Trust: SIA can help allay fears of affected groups and build a basis
of trust and cooperation which is so essential for successful project implementation
SAGAR SUNUWAR 80
Avoiding Adverse Impacts: SIA provides the basis for preparing mitigation measures to
avoid, reduce or manage adverse impacts
Enhancing Positive Impacts: SIA preparation also helps identify measures to
maximize/share project benefits
Reducing Costs: Addressing social impacts at an early stage helps to avoid costly errors in
future
Getting Approval Faster: A well prepared SIA demonstrates that social impacts are taken
seriously and helps in getting project clearance faster
A detailed assessment of the socio-economic conditions of the people who may be negatively
affected (Cernea’s risk assessment model can be useful);
A detailed study of the impacts in terms of the extent of displacement, the loss of livelihoods,
the second-order impacts as a result of submergence, construction mitigation measures,
downstream impacts, and host communities; and
A detailed plan to mitigate these impacts and an assessment of the costs of such measures.
40 This chapter outlines the steps involved in carrying out the Social Impact Assessment process,
and includes suggestions on how to follow them. (IOCPGSIA 1994)
Share information and consult with all stakeholders. Stakeholders are people, groups, or institutions
which are likely to be affected by a proposed intervention (either negatively or positively), or those
which can affect the outcome of the intervention. Develop and implement an effective public
involvement plan to involve all interested and affected stakeholders. The first step in developing plans
for consultation and participation is to identify stakeholders who will be involved in the consultative
processes. The basic questions to consider in identifying stakeholders include:
SAGAR SUNUWAR 81
Who might have an interest or feel that they are affected?
Who supports or opposes the changes that the project will produce?
Whose opposition could be detrimental to the success of the project?
Whose cooperation, expertise, or influence would be helpful to the success of the project?
Social Impact Assessment (SIA) process begins with screening. Screening is undertaken in the very
beginning stages of project development. The purpose of screening is to screen out “no significant
impacts” from those with significant impacts and get a broad picture of the nature, scale and
magnitude of the issues.
This helps in determining the scope of detailed SIA that would be subsequently carried out.
The next step is scoping. Essentially, this involves visit to the project site, and consultation with all
stakeholders. It is important to confirm their understanding of key issues. On-site appreciation of
impacts is indispensable for projects that cause displacement on a large scale. The local knowledge
can be invaluable in finding alternatives that help avoid or at least reduce the magnitude and severity
of adverse impacts.
This is an initial assessment of likely impacts and not meant to determine the level of impact. It should
only identify all of the issues and affected groups to get ‘all the cards on the table’
The next step is undertaking Social Impact Assessment and the following are the major activities:
To assess the extent of social impacts, it is necessary to assess the socio-economic conditions of the
affected people. This assessment generally involves conducting a socioeconomic survey and a broad
based consultation with all affected groups.
The socioeconomic profiling should not be restricted to adversely affected population. The survey
should include those who benefit from the employment and other economic opportunities generated
by the project.
This survey is carried out to see that in the host area enough land, income earning opportunities and
other resources exist to sustain additional population from the affected area, and that this influx does
not put pressure on local resources that the host population may resent. The other important thing to
see is that the people being relocated and the hosts are socially from a similar socio-cultural
background. The similarity in background helps greatly reduce social/ethnic frictions.
Once the range of impacts that are predictable has been identified, the next step is to determine their
significance (that is, whether they are acceptable, require mitigation, or are unacceptable). Since many
impacts are not quantifiable, it is impossible to rank them objectively. The community perceptions of
an impact and those of the SIA team are not necessarily the same. The affected people should
therefore be consulted in ranking impacts.
If impacts are found unacceptable, the SIA must clearly state that giving reasons. Generally, the Social
Impact Assessment is expected to result in specific mitigation plans to address relevant
social/resettlement issues and potential impacts.
SAGAR SUNUWAR 82
Step 9: Develop a Mitigation Plan
Develop a mitigation plan to firstly avoid displacement, secondly to minimize it, and thirdly to
compensate for adverse impacts. The major contribution of a SIA study is to help plan for, manage,
and then mitigate any negative impacts (or enhance any positive ones) that may arise due to a
proposed project.
Principles of SIA:
(1): Involve the Diverse Public
It is important to first identify all potentially affected groups and individuals, and involve them
throughout the SIA process. This involvement must reach out to groups that are routinely excluded
from decision making due to cultural, linguistic and economic barriers (lower caste and tribal groups,
minorities and poor people). The involvement should be truly interactive, with communication
flowing both ways between the agency and affected groups. This engagement will ensure that
stakeholder groups understand what the project is about and the possible ways it might affect them,
both positive and negative.
Projects affect different groups differently. Impacts should therefore be specified differentially
for affected groups, not just measured in the aggregate. Identification of all groups likely to be affected
is central to the concept of impact equity. There will always be winners and losers as a result of the
decision to build a dam or undertake some other development work. SIA should identify who will win
and who will lose, but no groups and individuals that are considered vulnerable due to race, ethnicity,
caste, gender, occupation, age or other factors should have to bear the brunt of adverse social impacts.
Often, time and resources available for doing social impact assessment are very limited. In such
circumstances, the best course is to focus on the most significant social impacts, giving high priority to
impacts identified by the people themselves. It is well known that some groups low in power do not
usually participate in project preparation stage, but SIA must ensure that their concerns are fully
addressed. At the same time, the role of SIA practitioners in impact analysis and assessment remains
important. They have the expertise to help prioritize issues, and are able to identify impacts often
missed out by the people themselves.
The SIA findings are inputs for designing a project to mitigate negative impacts and enhance
positive impacts. The project design process must ensure that all affected and interested persons get
an opportunity to comment on the draft before it is given a final shape.
Trained social scientists using social science research methods alone will get the best results.
An experienced SIA practitioner will know what data to look for. His familiarity with impacts that have
occurred elsewhere under similar settings will be an asset. It will be easier for him to identify the full
range of impacts and then select procedures appropriate for their measurement. The presence of a
social scientist in the interdisciplinary team will reduce the probability of any major social impact
remaining uncounted.
It is extremely important that the SIA practitioner be an independent social scientist, not a part
of the regulatory authority sponsoring the SIA study.
The monitoring of important social impact variables and the mitigation programmes is critical
to the SIA process. The monitoring and mitigation should be a joint responsibility of the project and
the affected community.
A social impact assessment not only predicts the likely impacts, it should also identify means to
mitigate those adverse impacts. Mitigation includes: avoiding the impact by not undertaking the
project; or undertaking it with a modified design that reduce the impact; or by compensating for
unavoidable and/or irreducible impacts.
Generally, SIAs draw on the following three sources of information: (a) Published scientific
literature, (b) Secondary data sources including various government documents and official reports,
and (c) Primary data from the affected area. All these three sources are important, but not all projects
may need them in equal measure. Some SIAs may require more primary data from the affected area
than the published materials from journals or books, for example.
The SIA can usefully consult previously published social science books, journal articles that
document knowledge of impacts and case studies from similar projects. The best secondary data
sources include census, compendium of statistics, land records data, and several government planning
and development reports. Survey research, informant interviews, and participant observation are
among the important primary data sources that can be used to verify data collected from other
sources. Often, project area people are quite knowledgeable about the local socioeconomic situation
and can provide a better understanding of the broader range of likely impacts.
SAGAR SUNUWAR 84
(9): Plan for Gaps in Data
Often, data relevant and necessary to carry out an assessment is not available yet the SIA is to
be carried out. In circumstances when information is incomplete or unavailable, it should be made
abundantly clear that assessment has been made in the absence of relevant and necessary data,
explaining why this could not be obtained.
Social Impacts:
Social Impacts are the changes that occur in communities or to individuals as a result of an externally-
induced change. IOCPGSIA (2003: 231) defines social impacts as “the consequences to human
populations of any pubic or private actions that alter the ways in which people live, work, play, relate
to one another, organize to meet their needs, and generally cope as members of society. The term also
includes cultural impacts involving changes to the norms, values, and beliefs that guide and rationalize
their cognition of themselves and their society.” Social Impacts are both positive and negative.
Changes may effect: employment, income, production, way of life, culture, community, political
systems, environment, health and well-being, personal and property rights, and fears and aspirations.
These impacts can be positive or negative. In short, a social impact is a significant improvement or
deterioration in people’s well-being.
Examples of projects with significant social impacts include: dams and reservoirs (disruption due to
relocation), power and industrial plants (influx of work force, pressure on infrastructure), roads and
linear projects (dislocation of activity networks), and landfill and hazardous waste disposal sites (seen
as health risks).
Social/Cultural
Break-up of community cohesion
Disintegration of social support systems
Disruption of women’s economic activities
Loss of time-honoured sacred places of worship
Loss of archeological sites and other cultural property
Economic
Loss of agricultural lands, tress, wells
Loss of dwellings and other farm buildings
Loss of access to common property resources
Loss of shops, commercial buildings
Loss of businesses/jobs
Overall reduction in income due to above losses
SAGAR SUNUWAR 85