You are on page 1of 3

LA CONSOLACION COLLEGE - BACOLOD

SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE, FINE ARTS AND INTERIOR DESIGN

Sta. Monica Building, San Juan St., Philippines 6100


Bacolod City Direct Line (034) 433-8706

Dear Respondents,

Greetings!

You have been chosen as one of the respondents in the researcher’s study on the proposition of
Proposed 3-Storey Columbarium in Bago City. The researcher requests that you answer the poll in a fair and
objective way. Your answers will be treated with utmost confidentiality.

The data that you will provide in a dependable and reliable way will be an incredible assistance to the
researcher so as guide her in the design of a proposed 3-Storey Columbarium in Bago City.

Respondent’s Name:(Optional)__________________________________ Gender:___Male___Female

I. Site Planning Considerations:

 In terms of the following aspects, on what rate would you say you are satisfied with the current
Columbarium in Bago City? (Rate 1-10: 10 is the highest)

_____ Geographical Condition _____Security and Safety


_____ Environment Friendly _____Planning and Circulation
_____Accessibility _____Facilities and Amenities

II. Design and Space Planning Considerations:

 How often do you visit a Columbarium? (Put a check)

_____Alone _____With partner


_____With friends and/or relatives _____Others

 What are your preferred physical condition of walls and height ceilings? (Check all that applies

_____ Ceiling Height: below 10 feet


_____ Ceiling Height: Above 10 feet
_____ Windows: Wide and tall openings
_____ Windows: Narrow and short openings
 What factor/s makes you consider a good columbarium building? (Put a check)

_____Building Design and Aesthetic _____Security and Safety


_____Cleanliness _____Planning and Circulation
_____Accessibility _____Facilities and Amenities
_____Services and Products _____Others

 What mode of transportation do you use to visit a columbarium building? (Put a check)

_____Private Car _____Motorcycle


_____Public Utility Vehicles (Jeepney, Taxi etc.) _____Others (Bicycle)

III. For the Proposed 3-Storey Columbarium:

 Please check the following facilities and amenities suited for your needs. (Put a check)

_____Triage _____Garden and Landscape


_____Vestibule _____Family Suite Room
_____Lobby _____Administrative Office
_____Event Halls _____ Souvenir Store
_____Cluster Room _____Parking Area
_____Chapel _____Cremation Room (Infant)
_____Prayer Room _____Indoor and Outdoor Niches
_____Rentable Spaces _____Others (Suggestions)
_____Cremation Room (Adult)

IV. Problems:

 What is/are the problems you usually encounter in visiting a Columbarium Building? (Put a check)

_____Poor Planning/ Circulation _____Poor Ventilation


_____Lack of Security _____Inadequate Parking Spaces
_____Insufficient Facilities/Amenities _____Lack of Services
_____Poor Ambience _____Poor Aesthetics
_____Not maintained Cleanliness _____Others
LA CONSOLACION COLLEGE BACOLOD
SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE,
FINE ARTS & INTERIOR DESIGN
Sta. Monica Building, San Juan St., Bacolod City, Philippines 6100
Telephone nos.: Direct Line: 433 – 8706

Proposed 3- Storey Columbarium in Bago City

VALIDATION OF SURVEY INSTRUMENTS

Name of Proponent: Harry E. Yunque


Course: Bachelor of Science in Architecture 5
Date: __________________

Instruction: Please rate the level of validity of the given survey instrument by checking the corresponding
boxes of the items below the base of the following:

5 – Excellent 4 – Very Satisfactory 3-Satisfactory 2-Good 1-Poor

CRITERIA FOR VALIDITY 5 4 3 2 1


1. The questionnaire is short enough that the respondent respects it and it
would not drain much precious time.
2. The questionnaire is interesting and has a fair appeal such that
respondents will be induced to respond to it and accomplish it fully.
3. The questionnaire can obtain some depth to the responses and avoid
superficial questions.
4. The items/questions and their alternative responses neither too
suggestive not too stimulating.
5. The questionnaires can illicit responses, which are definite but not
mechanically forced.
6. Questions/items are stated in such a way that the responses will not be
embarrassing to the person(s) concerned.
7. Questions/items are formed in such a way to avoid suspicion on the
part of the respondents concerning hidden responses in the
questionnaire.
8. The questionnaire is not too narrow or restrictive or limited in the
philosophy.
9. The responses to the questionnaire when taken as a whole could
answer the basic purpose of which the questionnaire is designed and
therefore considered valid.
TOTAL

Validated by: _____________________________________


Name and Signature

You might also like