You are on page 1of 2

The Social and Political Thought of Ziya Gökalp 1876-1924 by Taha Parla

Review by: Paul J. Magnarella


Middle East Journal, Vol. 40, No. 2 (Spring, 1986), p. 375
Published by: Middle East Institute
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4327357 .
Accessed: 21/06/2014 11:28

Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.

Middle East Institute is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Middle East
Journal.

http://www.jstor.org

This content downloaded from 91.229.229.210 on Sat, 21 Jun 2014 11:28:22 AM


All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
York University Press, 1985. Distrib. Columbia memberof the Committeeof Union and Progress,
University Press, New York. New York Univer- the firstprofessorof sociology at IstanbulUniver-
sity Studies in Near EasternCivilization,No. 10, sity, and a memberof the FirstTurkishRepublic's
xviii + 73 pages. Notes to p. 83. Index to p. 89. NationalAssembly.Relyingheavilyon the ideas of
$30.00. French sociologist Emile Durkheim, Gokalp at-
tempted to synthesize the concepts of Turkism,
TawfiqAl-Hakimfinishedthe manuscriptof this Islam, and Westernisminto a harmoniousmeta-
book at the age of 70 in 1972, after 20 years of physical system that he hoped could be trans-
Nasir's revolution. The book includes his assess- formedinto a psychologicallysettlingand socially
ment and impressionsnot only of the revolution valid programof action for Turkey. His hopes,
but also of Nasir as its mastermindand its leader. unfortunately,were never realized.
Al-Hakim is one of the most prominentand In the present work, which is a substantively
admiredwritersandplaywrightsin the Arabworld. unaltereddoctoral dissertation submitted to Co-
He is also a philosopherin his own right.Through lumbiaUniversityin 1980,authorParlaproclaims
his insight, sensitivityand wisdom, TheReturnof Gokalp to be "the only systematic thinker that
Consciousness expresses sentiments which this Turkeyhas producedin the twentiethcentury" (p.
reviewer believes are held by the vast majorityof 1). Parla'sgoals are to explicateGokalp'spolitical
Egyptians. philosophy and relate it to more recent Turkish
The workprogressessmoothlyfroma positionof political developments. He contends that the
enthusiasmandfull supportfor the revolution,as it "solidarismof the RepublicanPeople's Partyof the
symbolized a general consensus against King Second Republic(1960-1980),the Kemalismof the
Fariiq's corruption,to a position of bewilderment original RPP, the continuing Kemalism of the
over Nasir's mistakes, and then to a finalposition armed forces, and the national socialism of the
that the revolutionin fact representedsuspension National Action Party are variants of Gokalp's
of an evolutionarymovementtowarddemocracy, corporatism"(pp. 7-8). Parlais also determinedto
paralysis of thought, oppression, and on top of rescue Gokalpfrom chargesthat some of his writ-
that, lies and deception. "The ruler succeeded in ings displayedillogic, inconsistency, simple imita-
submergingall of Egypt within himself' (p. 55). tion, ethnocentricism,and even racism.
Worse, whenevertherewas a majorcalamity,such AlthoughParlapresentsan interestingthesis, his
as the 1967 defeat, "the responsible ones were abstractand jargonizedwritingseverely limit the
always the others. Thus he continuedto be in the utility of this work for the empirically-minded
seat of power in Egypt . . . that leadership which social scientist. Philosophersof political thought,
ruinedEgyptandbroughttragedyto the Arabs"(p. however, may find it rewarding. Parla fails to
43). An alternativetitle, in fact, mighteasily have utilize importantFrenchand Germansources, and
been "The Great Deceit." he offers insufficientevidence to supporthis criti-
Bayly Winderhas contributedsignificantlyto the cisms of Heyd's' superiorstudy of Gokalp's life
volume, not only because of his meticulousliterary and thought.
translationfromArabicto Englishbut, even more,
because of his detailedresearchof every personal-
ity and event mentionedin the originaltext. The 92 Paul J. Magnarella is Professor of Anthropol-
footnotes reflecta thoroughinvestigation,and this ogy, University of
book thus can be understoodbetter by non-Arab and Change in Florida and author of Tradition
a Turkish Town (1981) and The
readers unfamiliarwith Egypt's personalitiesand PeasantVenture
(1979).
modernhistory. Furthermore,it can be used as a
referencefor seriousresearch. TheReturnof Con-
sciousness is a must for anyone wishingto under-
standNasir's revolution.Indeedit is a masterpiece
as translatedinto Englishby Winder.
Ibrahim M. Oweiss, Georgetown University, Recent Publications
Washington, DC.

GENERAL
The Social and Political Thoughtof Ziya Gokalp
1876-1924, by Taha Parla. Leiden, E. J. Brill, The Middle East: Past and Present, 2nd ed. by
1985.Social, Economicand PoliticalStudiesof the Yahya Armajani and Thomas Ricks. Englewood
MiddleEast. Vol. 35. vii + 128pages. Notes to p. Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1985. xiv + 466 pages.
148.Bibl. to p. 157.GLDRS60.00, c. $19.00paper.
1. Uriel Heyd, Foundations of Turkish Na-
Ziya Gokalp (1876-1924), the writer, poet and tionalism: The Life and Teachings of Ziya Gokalp
majortheorist of Turkishnationalism,was also a (London: Luzac, 1950).

375

This content downloaded from 91.229.229.210 on Sat, 21 Jun 2014 11:28:22 AM


All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

You might also like