Professional Documents
Culture Documents
IN PHILIPPINE
HISTORY
MODULES
1ST Semester 2021-2022
Instructor:
INTRODUCTION
Jose R. Gaviola
This course GE-RPH (Readings in Philippine history), analyzes Philippine history
from multiple perspectives through the lens of selected primary sources coming from
different disciplines and genres. Opportunities are given for the learners to analyze the
authors’ background and main arguments, compare different points of view, detect biases and
examine evidences presented in the documents. Traditional topics and other interdisciplinary
themes that will broaden their understanding of the socio-political, economic, cultural,
scientific and religious history will be tackled. Priority is given to primary sources that could
help the learners develop their historical and critical capabilities that will make them
versatile, articulate, broad-minded and responsible citizens. To carry out what the course
intends to achieve, instructional modules are developed.
GUIDELINES
Each module is given tentative time allotment for completion to guide the learners when to
submit the required outputs so as to discourage overdue submission. Those with problem on
internet connectivity may submit hard copy of legible handwritten or encoded outputs
through somebody I may designate to receive. Screenshots of outputs sent through face book
will not be considered.
Outputs submitted two weeks after deadline is deemed “overdue” and will only be
noted “submitted.” Submission should be chronological, that is, from the first to the last. It
has been noted that there were students who submit later requirements ahead of the earlier
ones or according to their whims. There were also those who submit long overdue outputs
and demand early grades. Never upload the whole module ONLY THE
ACTIVITY/ANSWER SHEETS. Make sure to indicate the “Date submitted” for reckoning
purposes. For those submitting online, I would prefer to receive outputs via Google
Classroom than via e-mail or messenger for facility in tracing the owner. Outputs not within
the prescribed guidelines will not be entertained.
Learners may confer with peers about their outputs but not to the extent of submitting
the outputs of someone including the owner’s name. Duplicated outputs will not be credited.
To maximize the value of these modules, try to read and go over before interacting with
them. For the full understanding of the content of a particular topic manage to access the
primary sources used in the sections of the module.
MODULES AT A GLANCE
Module 1 – The Meaning and Relevance of History
Section 9 – Corazon C. Aquino’s Speech Before the United States Congress on Sept.
18, 1986
Time Frame: Week 3 to 7, 2021 (October 25, 2021 to November 22 – 26, 2021)
Module 3 – Controversies and Conflicting Views in Philippine History: One Past but
Many Histories
Section 4 - Indigenous Filipino Spirituality and Republic Act 8371 or the Indigenous
People’s Right Act (IPRA) Act of 1997
MODULE I
THE MEANING AND RELEVANCE OF HISTORY
The importance and relevance of studying history in the 21st century is the emphasis of
this module. It aims to analyze Philippine history from varied perspectives based
on selected primary
sources or documents derived
from various disciplines and
genre. Module 1 consists of
three sections. Section 1
focuses on the meaning,
definition, issues and
methodology; Section 2 deals
with the distinction between
primary and secondary
sources; while Section 3 is on
the evaluation of historical
sources.
Section 1 – Introduction to
History: Definition, Issues
and Methodology
This section introduces history as a discipline and as a narrative. It presents the definition of
history, its importance, discusses some issues and the historical methodology employed by
historians.
Learning Objectives.
Instructions. Answer the following questions based on what you learned from the
elementary and secondary education.
1. What is history?
History is the study of the past. Events before the invention of writing systems are considered
prehistory. "History" is an umbrella term comprising past events as well as the memory,
discovery, collection, organization, presentation, and interpretation of these events.
2. Why study history? What benefits do you get from the study of history?
As an individual we need to study history in order for us to have knowledge of what had
happened from the past. There are many benefits we could gain in studying history and the
best part for me in studying it is “the learning of the cultures different from ours of today.
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
3. How did you learn history? What learning activities have you undergone in the study
of history in the elementary and secondary school?
___________________________________________________________________________
I guess I started learning history way back in my elementary level started from the basics
until I graduated Highschools and Senior Highschools even today that I am already on my
College level. And as I had answered the question from number 2 I refer that learning various
cultures from us is the best learning I have undergone as I studied history.
4. What attitude or reaction was developed in you towards history by the learning
activities you experienced in the study of history?
___________________________________________________________________________
i was amazed by the different cultures people in the past were practicing a long time
ago.
Historiography and history are both concerned with the past. Historiography is the study of
history writing, while history is the study of human
history.____________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
Historians, like fiction writers, "make" (or "find") the historical story/discourse defined by an
attested but chosen sequence of actual events. ... This type of history necessitates a different
narrative technique than "telling it like it
was."______________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Object of Study: History – study of the past, past events and causes of such events.
Historiography –is history itself i.e. “How was a certain historical text written?” “
Who wrote it?” “ What was the context of its publication?” “What particular historical
method was employed?” “ What were the sources used?”
Historiography helps student have a better understanding of history, not only learn
historical facts but are also provided with understanding of the facts and the
historian’s context. Methods employed by historians, theory and perspective which
guided him are analyzed. It teaches students to be critical to the lessons presented to
him.
Roles of history in the past
- States used history to unite a nation; as a tool to legitimize regimes and forge a
sense of collective identity through collective memory
- Lessons from the past can make sense of the present. Learning from past mistakes
can help people not to repeat them
- Being reminded of a great past can inspire people to continue their good practice.
An exact and accurate account of the past is impossible because we cannot go back to
the past. The past cannot be accessed directly as subject matter. Historians only access
representation of the past through historical sources and evidences.
What then are the tasks of a historian?
1. Seek historical evidences and facts and interpret these facts. Facts cannot speak
for themselves.
2. Give meaning to these facts and organize them into timelines
3. Establish causes and write history.
Historian are influenced by their context, environment, ideology, education and
influences. Their interpretation of a historical fact is affected by their context and
circumstances. Their subjectivity influences the process of their historical
research: the methodology they will use, the facts that they shall select and deem
relevant, their interpretation and even the form of their writings. These make
history subjective.
Despite the historians’ subjectivity, the study of history still remains scientific
because of the rigors of research and the methodology employed.
Historical methodology – comprises certain techniques and rules that historians follow to
properly utilize sources and historical evidences in writing history. Certain rules apply in
cases of conflicting accounts in different sources and how to properly treat eyewitness
accounts and oral sources as valid historical evidence.
We can learn about the construction, operation, and evolution of past communities,
institutions, ideologies, governments, cultures, and technology by studying history. ... All of
this knowledge allows students to become more well-rounded individuals who are better
prepared to learn in all of their academic disciplines. History allows us to examine and
comprehend how people and communities functioned in the past. We can, for example, judge
war by looking back on prior occurrences, even while a country is at peace. History gives us
the information we need to make laws or formulate ideas about many areas of society.
___________________________________________________________________________
2. Differentiate history from historiography in terms of object of study and benefits that
learner get from each of them.
History is the study of an event or a period of time. The study of how history was written,
who wrote it, and what variables influenced how it was written is known as historiography.
Historiography teaches us how cultural, political, economic, and other factors can influence
how history is recorded over time. It helps us to get as near to historical fact as feasible as
long as we don't bring any biases with us.
___________________________________________________________________________
I think the best thing that a historian to consider in order for him to minimize his
subjectivity is by focusing only on the important situations wherein societal issues are
involved and there’ll be also another things to consider but on my side it’s the only
thing I could answer.
4. The job of a historian is not only to collect sources and facts but interprets those facts.
Why is there a need to interpret those facts?
___________________________________________________________________________
For my own point of view historians need to interpret those facts in order for their sources
and information to be in detailed forms.
5. In the early advent of history as a discipline, the historians were guided by the
mantra, “no document, no history.” How do you understand or interpret this maxim?
___________________________________________________________________________
As what I had understood from this mantra, it simply means that documents are proof of
information/s.
References:
Farrell, K. (2014), Primary and secondary sources in the study of history. Encased in steel.
Retrieved from www.encasedinsteel.co.uk/2014/09/19/primary-and-secondary-sources -in-
the-study-of-history
Redmon, R. (2013, December 2). Primary vs. secondary sources. [Video file]. Retrieved
from https://youtube/cqXHO7bTPnw
Saint Mary’s University. (2013). Primary vs. secondary sources. Retrieved from
http://www2smumn.edu/deptpages/tclibrary/tutorials/finding/primary.pdf
Overview
Topics
Learning Resources
Learning Activities:
Activity 1. Instructions: Definition of terms related to historical sources are presented in
the diagrams below. Rewrite them in your own words on the space provided.
Primary – not made or coming from Firsthand – coming directly from the original
something else; original source
_____________________________________ _____________________________________
Primary sources are the sources which comes Firsthand sources are the sources which comes
from its own and made by its own. from another sources
_____________________________________ _____________________________________
_____________________________________ _____________________________________
_____________________________________ _____________________________________
_____________________________________ _____________________________________
_____________________________________ _____________________________________
____________________________________________________
____________________________________________________
____________________________________________________
____________________________________________________
___
Secondary – coming from or created using Secondhand – not original; taken from
original source someone or something else
_____________________________________ _____________________________________
Secondary source is a source by the use of the Secondhand source cannot be considered as
original source. “plagiarism” but also gets the source from
_____________________________________ another source.
_____________________________________ _____________________________________
_____________________________________ _____________________________________
_____________________________________ _____________________________________
_____________________________________ _____________________________________
_____________________________________\ _____________________________________
Primary Source
oral histories government publications
Therefore, primary and secondary sources should be evaluated. Most scholars use the
following questions in evaluating the validity and credibility of sources of historical
accounts.:
1. How did the author know about the given details? Was the author present at the
event? How soon was the author able to gather the detail of the event?
3. Did the author conclude based on a single source, or on many sources of evidence?
1. Using the Venn diagram compare and contrast the characteristics of primary and secondary
sources. Write the common characteristics of both sources on the overlap of the diagram.
Provide an explanation for the overlapping characteristics on the space provided below the
diagram
Primary sources are firsthand accounts of a topic, whereas secondary sources are any
accounts of something other than a primary source. Secondary sources include published
research, newspaper articles, and other forms of media.
diaries, letters, and ship's logs birth certificates, for example, are original documents.
c. Mamasapano Massacre
Search for primary and secondary sources that show or explain the significance of
your chosen historical event. Write down the selected sources and identify the possible biases
that they might contain.
1. Primary Sources
c. The interview Kit Tatad, Johnny Ponce E, Fidel Tabako and other generals still
alive ____________________________________________________________________
2. Secondary Sources
____________________________________________________________________
b. Some sources say that Marcos signed the proclamation on September 17 or
on September 22—but, in either case, the document itself was dated September 21.
____________________________________________________________________
c. In his own diary, Marcos wrote on September 14, 1972 that he informed the military
that he would proceed with proclaiming Martial Law.
____________________________________________________________________
3. Identify 3 sources that you don’t have access to, but could still be useful to explain your
chosen historical event. Explain.
As early as May 17, 1969, Marcos hinted the declaration of Martial Law, when he addressed
the Philippine Military Academy Alumni Association.
By the end of January 1970, Enrile, with the help of Efren Plana and Minerva Gonzaga Reyes,
submitted the only copy of the confidential report on the legal nature and extent of Martial
Law to Marcos
On May 8, 1972, Marcos confided in his diary that he had instructed the military to update its
plans, including the list of personalities to be arrested, and had met with Enrile to finalize the
legal paperwork required.
References
Cabrera, V. (2017, May 29). Fake news also hounded 1896 Philippine revolution.Philippine
Dailyn Inquirer. Retrieved from http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/900457/fake-nes-also-hounded-
1896-philippine revolution