You are on page 1of 1

PRINCIPLE OF CATASTROPHISM

Catastrophism is the theory that the Earth has been affected in the past by sudden,
short-lived, violent events, possibly worldwide in scope. This was in contrast to
uniformitarianism (sometimes described as gradualism), in which slow incremental changes,
such as erosion, created all the Earth's geological features. Uniformitarianism held that the
present is the key to the past, and that all things continued as they were from the indefinite
past. Since the early disputes, a more inclusive and integrated view of geologic events has
developed, in which the scientific consensus accepts that there were some catastrophic events
in the geologic past, but these were explicable as extreme examples of natural processes
which can occur.

Catastrophism held that geological epochs had ended with violent and sudden natural
catastrophes such as great floods and the rapid formation of major mountain chains. Plants
and animals living in the parts of the world where such events occurred were killed off, being
replaced abruptly by the new forms whose fossils defined the geological strata. The concept
was first popularised by the early 19th-century French scientist Georges Cuvier, who
proposed that new life forms had moved in from other areas after local floods, and avoided
religious or metaphysical speculation in his scientific writings

Catastrophism was a theory developed by Georges Cuvier based on paleontological


evidence in the Paris Basin. Cuvier was there when he observed something peculiar about the
fossil record. Instead of finding a continuous succession of fossils, Cuvier noticed several
gaps where all evidence of life would disappear and then abruptly reappear again after a
notable amount of time. Cuvier recognized these gaps in the fossil succession as mass
extinction events. This led Cuvier to develop a theory called catastrophism. Catastrophism
states that natural history has been punctuated by catastrophic events that altered that way life
developed and rocks were deposited.

Although Cuvier hypothesized that the flooding of lowland areas could have been the
cause of mass extinctions, he never really explained any force that could cause the flooding to
occur in the first place. Therefore, an implication of Cuvier’s theory is that the forces acting
on the earth must have changed periodically throughout earth’s history. Because Cuvier never
identified these forces, many individuals believed these extinctions could have been the result
of biblical floods or acts of god.

An avid supporter of catastrophism was Abraham Werner, the leading geologist of the
th
18 century. As we have seen before, Werner was the most influential supporter of
neptunism, a theory stating that most of the rocks observable at earth’s surface was once
precipitated out of a vast ocean. Therefore, Werner used catastrophism as evidence to prove
that the earth had experienced mass floods throughout geologic history. However, both
catastrophism and neptunism would eventually be discarded during the 19th century.

You might also like