Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SIDE OF A SQUARE
SIDE OF A SQUARE
SIDE OF A SQUARE
e
DIAMETER OF A
DIAMETER OF A
DIAMETER OF A
DIAMETER OF A
THICKNESS (in)
THICKNESS (in)
THICKNESS (in)
THICKNESS (in)
LIVE OR
FOOTING (in)
FOOTING (in)
FOOTING (in)
FOOTING (in)
decks to be built on grade using pre- Deck beams (RB200). A few subtle
cast pier blocks (typically sold at local changes have been made to the sec-
home improvement stores). But there tion dealing with beams, including
are a few limitations: the addition of single-ply beams to the
• The joists must bear directly on the deck beam span table and the notched
pier blocks (that is, without any ver- post-to-beam connection detail. The
tical posts). implication of this is that 4x4 posts
• The deck surface is not more than can be notched to carry a single-ply
20 inches above grade. beam, while notched 4x6 or 6x6 posts
• The deck does not exceed 200 are allowed to carry two-ply beams. It
square feet. also clarifies that beams must be sup-
Wood patios (RB205). The third ported on the posts over their entire
exception allows for freestanding bearing length and width. This elim-
decks to be built with joists sitting inates notched 4x4 posts supporting
directly on grade—sometimes referred two-ply beams, one of which is canti-
to as wood patios. Because joist siz- levered off the post.
ing is not specified, any PT members Deck joists (RB210). The section
rated for ground contact can be used. on joists has been amended slightly
Joist spacing is limited by the deck- to say that all joists attached to led-
ing boards per the table in the code or ger boards now have to be connected
manufacturer’s instructions. with joist hangers—they cannot bear
Footing and post connection on 2x2 ledger strips.
(RB213, RB214). The old deck post- Additionally, the DCC modified the
to-footing drawing, Figure R507.8.1, lengths for cantilevered deck joists
has been replaced with a better draw- based on joist spacing. The maximum
ing offering more options and clari- cantilever is now limited to either the
fying language for lateral restraint of span length divided by 4 (that is, L/4)
the post. One of the details in the new or the value in the table—whichever
drawing reflects that deck posts do not is the lesser, because the limit may be
have to be physically attached to the governed by the bending strength of
footing as long as the post is restrained the wood or the deflection of the wood
laterally (that is, buried) with at least under full loading.
12 inches of soil around the base. Decking (RB209). Proprietary engi-
In addition, other engineered foot- neered decking and fastening systems
ing systems, such as helical piers, can- are now specifically permitted by code
not be “not permitted” by the local if installed in accordance with the
building official. manufacturer’s requirements. ❖
Deck posts (RB212). The post-height
table was expanded to include 8x8 Chuck Bajnai is Chief Residential Plan
wood posts with a maximum height Reviewer in Chesterfield County, Va.,
of 14 feet based on a 40-psf live load. and chairman of the Deck Code Coalition.
www.deckmagazine.com