Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MINING AT SUKINDA
(c)
Figure 1 (a-d) Existing Situations in the mines
OVER BURDEN DUMP STABILITY
The stability of dump slopes is affected by numerous factors as shown in the Figure 2
10
SSIOMCE 2015
The CMRI (March, 2000) studied and identified three joint
sets (joint sets J1, J2 and J3), with J1 representing a
systematic joint set and sets J2 and J3 representing sub-
systematic sets. Joint spacing was noted to be between
0,2m and 1,0m, while the micro joint condition was noted
to be smooth planar to slightly undulating. The mean
persistence of the jointing was noted to be 6m, with a
minimum and maximum persistence of 1m and 10m
respectively.
The strike length under Tata Steel is 2.2 km. In the mine Soil/ Rock samples collected from designated locations
there are three chromite bands, the deposit is being mined in each mine site were prepared following the International
at 70m depth currently while the ore is present up to a Society of Rock Mechanics (ISRM) specifications and all
depth of around 200m. The host rock is hard ultra the related laboratory testing for strength were conducted
basicperidotite which hosts the chromite ore. It is a in the Department of Mining Engineering IIT Kharagpur.
stratiform deposit with dip of 85o. The total lease area under Thetests conducted are:
Tata steel is 402 hectare of which around 60% is the ore
bearing area. Figure 4shows views of the mining site at w Specific gravity
Sukinda. w Slake durability test: Slake durability test is intended
to assess the resistance offered by a rock sample to
weakening and disintegration when subjected to two
standard cycle of drying and wetting.
11
SSIOMCE 2015
w Grain size distribution analysis factor of safety values within a few percent of the “correct”
w Proctor’s Compaction test. To determine the moisture values. The equation 13 represents the safety factor the
content at which the maximum dry unit weight is slope based Bishop’s Method.
attained is generally referred to as the optimum
moisture content.
w Permeability (1)
w Direct simple shear tests for Cohesion and angle of
internal friction
12
SSIOMCE 2015
mine officials. These sections were marked on the plan conditins. Three dump locations were selected for analysis
and were named as AA’, BB’, CC’, PP’, RR’. The material to determine the FoSat different cross sections. Figure 9
distributions and dumping sequence information were not shows the cross sections and the FoS values determined
available. The FoS is therefore calculated for limonite and by obtained using GeoStudio 2007 (Students Version).For
mixed HUB conditions considering most unfavourable the cross section, the variations of shear resistance and
conditions with assumed pore pressure as well as for dry pore pressure along the X axis were determined and shown
in Table 1 along with the calculated factor of safety values
Table 1 Variations of shear resistance and pore pressures in the dumps
Slope Conditions FoS Cross Section of Slope Variation of FoS and Pore
pressure
250
230
220
Maximum 210
200
190
Pore 180
170
Pressure
El e va tio n
160
150
140
Limonite 130
120
110
1.267
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
25
0
10
24
0
0 23
0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 14 0 160 18 0 200 22 0 240 2 60 280 3 00 320 3 40
22
0
Di st an ce
21
0
20
0
19
0
18
0
17
0
No Pore 1.974
El eva ti on
16
0
15
0
14
0
13
0
Pressure 12
0
11
0
10
0
1.974
0
9
0
8
0
7
0
6
0
5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0
0 20 40 60 80 10
0 12
0 140 160 180 200 20 24
0 26
0 280 300 320 340
Distance
250
240
230
220
210
200
190
180
160
Ele vat i on
150
Maximum 140
130
120
1. 791
Pore 110
100
90
Pressure 80
70
60
Mixed HUB 50
40
30
20
10
0
0 20 0
4 60 80 100 12
0 140 6
10 18
0 200 20 24
0 6
20 28
0 300 2
30 34
0
Di stanc e
13
SSIOMCE 2015
B-B' Without 2.8
pore
pressure
90
Elevation
80
Mixed HUB 70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 14 0 160 1 80 200 220 24 0 260 2 80 30 0 320
Distance
Mixed HUB 90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 1 40 150 1
Distance
14 Material 2.604
SSIOMCE 2015 Mixed HUB 2.604
100
With
Elevation
90
80
maximum 70
60
pore 50
40
pressure 30
20
10
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170
Max Pore 2.5
Pressure
Limonite 1.775
1.7
El eva ti on
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Dist a
80
P' with 70
maximum 60
50
pore 40
pressure 30
20
10
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 1
15
SSIOMCE 2015
Limonite 3.336
Ele
ELEVATION
R-R' Mix HUB 6.527
100
80
60
6.527
40
20
0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340 360 380 400 420 440
DISTANCE
ELEV ATION
limonite 4.483
100
80
60
4.483
40
20
0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340 360 380 400 420 440
DISTANCE
The analysis of various sections indicates that the average soil units; in other cases,failure may occur through the
FOS of the slopes of the spoil dumps range from 1.2 to spoil material itself. While placing limonite in a spoil dump
4.26. However, it should be noted that these values are care must be taken.
based on the given information of the stacked materials.
The records of materials stacked and their characteristics Limit equilibrium analysis shows that the zone of
are not maintained as a record and the characteristics of instabilityof spoil pile may be alongthe interface between
the layers and materials stacked are assumed in the spoil materials and the underlying limonite layers, if any,
analysis based on the best information available. as it has higher potential to flow. Excessive moisture in
the spoil pile, dueto rainfall or wet overburden material in
CONCLUSIONS the rainy season, may trigger slopefailure.
Situation of spoil instability under high rainfall conditions Failure in the spoil dumps may be initiated by weakening
cannot be ruled out in the slopes of Sukinda mines. ofmoisture-sensitive material at the base of the spoil
Causes of spoil instabilityare related to weak underlying
16
SSIOMCE 2015
piles,particularly because of infiltration of surface water The run off prevention through garland drains and check
afterheavy rainfall. Settlement in the spoil dump may damsdeveloped in the mine are in order. The geo textile
produce surface (tension) cracks that may provide has been practiced for slope stabilization. However, due
preferentialpathways for the rain to infiltrate into the spoils, to heavy rainfall, gully formation and circular failures are
raisingthe piezometric surface and increasing the pore visible. Toe stabilization using alternative of gabions e.g.
pressures. Such situation will result in instable slope and big boulders or waste filled gunny bags will be necessary.
failure.Therefore, strictly followed vigilance checklist must Drought resistant varities of plants e.g. vetiver grass could
be maintained. be experimented along with presently practiced plants e.g.
Sirsa, Karanja, jammun, Mahanim, Nim, Acasia, Chakunda
In the present analysis, maximum pore pressure has etc. It is recommended that the final dumps must be
considered based on the past rainfall data. Detailed brought under effective frequent monitoring system
seepage analysis was not within the scope of this work as incorporating fixed low cost slope monitoring station.
the layer information of the spoil dumps is not available. It
is expected that there may be heterogeneously placed REFERENCE
materials with different size of boulders which may facilitate
to formation of flow channels and seepage as well as 1. Chakraborty, K. L. and Chakraborty , T. L., 1984
undercut, galleys and failure. Instrumentation and Geological Features and Origin of the Chromite
monitoring of spoil movement and settlements should be Deposits of Sukinda Valley, Orissa, India, Mineral.
practiced for the dumps. Deposita 19,256-265
17
SSIOMCE 2015