Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract
The Strut-and-Tie Method (STM) is an emerging procedure for the design of D- (Discontinuity)
Regions. D-Regions are those parts of a structure in which there is a complex variation in strain,
such as corbels, deep beams, joints, and walls with openings. The STM design process involves
idealizing that an internal truss carries the load through the discontinuity region to its boundaries,
providing sufficient reinforcement to serve as the tension ties, and then checking that the
compressive struts and nodal zones (joints) are sufficiently large enough to support the applied
forces. While the STM is conceptually simple, calculating and modifying the dimensions of the
truss and its members can be prohibitively time consuming. This paper describes a graphical
design tool that enables the user to draw the D-Region to be designed, draw an internal
supporting truss, select member dimensions, and select tension tie reinforcement. The program
continuously recalculates the truss and nodal zone forces (and stresses), and thereby creates an
efficient interactive STM design tool.
For the purpose of the design, a structure may be divided into B- (Beam) Regions and D-
(Discontinuity) Regions. B-Regions are those parts of the structure in which there is a linear
variation in strain over the depth of the member, while D-Regions are those parts of a structure in
which there is a complex variation in strain. Based on St. Venant’s principle, D-Regions lie
within a longitudinal distance equal to the depth of the member from a concentrated force (load
or reaction point), change in section depth, an opening, or another discontinuity. As Figure 1
illustrates, a large portion of even common structures are D-Regions.
D B D B D
B B
D B D B D B D
D D D
B
B B
D
D D
An emerging methodology for the design of all types of D-Regions is to envision and design an
internal truss, consisting of concrete compressive struts and steel tension ties that are
interconnected at nodes, to support the imposed loading through to the boundaries of the
discontinuity region. This design methodology is called the Strut-and-Tie Method1-9 (STM). The
design process involves the steps described below. In Figure 2, these steps are illustrated using a
Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY on 07/25/13. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved.
variety of D-Region designs examples including a corbel, a corner joint, a dapped-ended beam,
and a deep beam.
(i) Define the boundaries of the D-Region and determine the imposed local and sectional forces.
(ii) Sketch the internal supporting truss, determine equivalent loadings, and solve for truss
member forces.
(iii) Select reinforcing or prestressing steel to provide the necessary tie capacity and ensure
that this reinforcement is properly anchored in the nodal zone (joint of the truss).
(iv) Evaluate the dimensions of the struts and nodes, such that the capacity of these components
(struts and nodes) is sufficient to carry the design forces values.
734 kN
1090 kN
356 kN
kN
kN
15
41
3
3
50
50
kN
Tie 169 kN-m
1090 kN
356 kN
734 kN 2 layers of #13 @ 250 mm o.c.
1446 kN
378 kN
5 #13 two-legged
(ii) Strut stirrups @ 150 mm
h
386 kN-m
2 layers of
356 kN #13 @ 300 mm o.c.
25 mm
(i) h
75
m m 75
m m mm
50
Figure 2: Strut-and Tie Models and Steps in Design
While the STM is a conceptually simple design tool, there are numerous uncertainties and
complications that can encumber the five-step design procedure. A few of these are briefly
described below:
Strut and Node Capacity: The ultimate stress at failure in struts and nodal zones is influenced by
Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY on 07/25/13. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved.
several factors including shape, state of strain/cracking, and the level of confinement. The
influence of these factors is poorly understood and this leads to uncertainties in the design
method. Additionally, designers are not able to take advantage of factors that they believe would
increase capacity or improve behavior.
Geometry of Struts and Nodal Zones: It is unclear how to define the effective dimensions of
struts and nodal zones. This is particularly difficult for configurations in which more than 3
members intersect. Since the capacity of the struts and nodes are directly proportional to their
effective widths, this creates uncertainties in the design process.
Anchorage of Tie Reinforcement: In the cut-away truss, the transfer of forces between members
and the anchorage of tension ties occurs entirely in the nodal zone. In the full structure (“filled-
in” truss), this force transfer is more broadly distributed. There are uncertainties about anchorage
requirements, the need to distribute reinforcement throughout the nodal region, and the factors
that influence these requirements. See Figure 3a.
Truss Geometry and Dimensions: The initially selected geometry of the truss, including strut and
nodal zone dimensions, must often be adjusted in order to satisfy stress limit criteria, to
investigate other configurations, and to optimize the design. This can make hand-solutions
prohibitively time consuming, particularly for the design of complex structures for which there is
the need to consider multiple load cases.
Statically Indeterminate Trusses: The non-linear axial stiffness characteristics of struts and ties
are poorly understood. Consequently, the designer has little guidance for determining the
distributions of loads in indeterminate strut-and-tie (truss) models. See Figures 3b and 3c.
Figure 3a: The influence of Figure 3b: Two load paths Figure 3c: The indeterminate
anchorage conditions on the for how a point load is strut-and-tie model used in
shape and strength of struts supported in a deep beam designing the SkyDome
The CAST program is being developed to provide both students and practitioners with a
graphical design tool that makes the design process more efficient and transparent. The first
author has had the opportunity to teach the STM to 9 classes of students. It has been his
experience that students readily take to the STM. This is believed to be due to their familiarity
and confidence in the simple mechanics of a truss. Students are also able to readily appreciate the
Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY on 07/25/13. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved.
rational for the various STM design provisions that have been developed. However, once a
specific design assignment is given, they can quickly become bogged down in the details of
calculating truss member forces and ensuring that the dimensions of the struts and nodal zones
are sufficient to support the imposed loadings. The CAST program is a graphically interactive
design tool has been under development for the last 2.5 years. While the program already
provides basic capabilities, additional development is ongoing in order to enable the designer to
quickly optimize his or her design, handle multiple load cases, and generate final drawings. The
program is also being designed to serve as an instructional device, familiarizing students and
practitioners with both the program and the strut-and-tie design philosophy.
Design Sequence Using Program CAST
The user begins by defining the boundaries of the D-Region using a mouse, by numerical entry,
or by selecting an object from a group of templates. The position of all of the nodes that define
the shape of the object can be easily redefined. The applied loading, bearing plates, material
properties, and support conditions can then be selected from toolbars or specified in dialogue
boxes. To help the user in the selection of a truss, an elastic finite element analysis feature is
being developed to generate stress contours and principal stress trajectories. The designer defines
the truss by first selecting the location of the center of the nodes and then forming truss members
by interconnecting these nodes. The truss can then be analyzed, with the results being displayed
alongside the truss member. Using a toolbar, the user can then select and position the estimated
tension tie reinforcement as well as select the widths of the compressive struts. The capacity of
the struts and ties as well as the applied stress on the faces of the nodes can then be displayed.
The designer can use the nodal zoom edit tools to change features of the node that influence node
and truss geometry, and thereby affect the stresses on the face of the nodes and design strengths.
Once the user is satisfied with the design, the detailed design including member forces,
capacities, stresses on the faces of nodal zones, and reinforcement details can be printed.
A few images from the CAST design tool are illustrated in Figure 4.
CLR S
86 kN
-1 trut6
0 kN
Tie8
Tie5
32
ALL
Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY on 07/25/13. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved.
kN
S
-100 kN
86 kN
86 kN
-1 trut3
Tie7
Tie4
32
kN
-86 kN
100 kN J9 Strut1 J10 Strut6
-100 kN
S/T
PRP St
0 kN
Tie5
ru
172 kN
-2
86 kN
64 t4
Tie3
Tie6
kN
Y
J13
X
S/T
PRP
100 kN J5
Node ACI
PRP CCC
ACI ACI
CCT CTT
While a few finite element based programs have been written to help in the selection and
10-16
evaluation of strut-and-tie models , it is believed that this is the first program with the
capabilities that were summarized above and are more fully described below. Note that most
aspects of capabilities C1 and C2, and, a small number of C5 and C6 have been completed over
the last two and a half years.
C1: GUI for Drawing Capabilities C5: Advanced Drawing and Input/Output
Capabilities
• define structure boundaries either • ability to print all images
graphically or numerically • displayed comparison of member loads & capacities
• standard drawing features (cut, copy, paste, • option for display of stresses on nodal zone faces
move, zoom, pan, unlimited redo and undo) • nodal zoom feature for additional details
• toolbars and dialogue boxes for defining • easy adjustment of details to adjust capacities
common elements such as loading forces, • CAD input/output features
material properties, supports, & bearing plates • create tab delimited files that save design details
• define joints by mouse or in dialogue box and results of design in spreadsheet format
• define struts and ties by interconnecting nodes
Conclusions
Design by the elegant Strut-and-Tie Method is often encumbered by the need to perform many
time consuming calculations that are required to determine truss members forces and
dimensions. This is a barrier to the use of the STM, particularly for the design of highly complex
D-Regions, for multiple load cases, or for design optimization. The CAST design tool was
developed to overcome these barriers by creating a interactive graphical design and analysis tool.
References
1.) Marti, P., “Basic Tools of Reinforced Concrete Beam Design,” ACI Journal, Proceedings,
Vol. 82, No. 1, January-February 1985, pp. 45-56.
2.) Schlaich, J., Schäfer, K., and Jennewein, M., “Toward a Consistent Design of Structural
Concrete,” Journal of the Prestressed Concrete Institute, Vol. 32, No. 3, May-June 1987, pp. 74-
150.
3.) Schlaich, J. and Schäfer, K., “Design and Detailing of Structural Concrete Using Strut-and-
Tie Models,” The Structural Engineer, Vol. 69, No. 6, March 1991, pp. 113-125.
4.) ASCE-ACI Committee 445 on Shear and Torsion, “Recent Approaches to Shear Design of
Structural Concrete,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 124, No. 12, December
1998, pp. 1375-1417.
5.) CEB-FIP Model Code 1990, Thomas Telford Services, Ltd., London, for Comité Euro-
International du Béton, Laussane, 1993, 437 pp.
6.) FIP Commission 3, FIP Recommendation 1996, “Practical Design of Structural Concrete,”
Fédération Internationale de la Precontrainte, May 1998.
8.) American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, “AASHTO LRFD
Bridge Specification,” 1st ed., Washington, DC, 1994.
Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY on 07/25/13. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved.
9.) MacGregor, J. G. and ACI Committee 318E (Shear and Torsion), “Appendix X and CE49:
Strut-and-Tie Models,” Draft of Code and Commentary Considered by Committee ACI 318 for
2002 ACI Building Code, June 2000.
10.) Anderheggen, E. and Schlaich, M., “Computer Aided Design of Reinforced Concrete
Structures Using the Truss Model Approach,” Proceedings of the Second International
Conference on Computer Aided Analysis and Design of Concrete Structures, N. Bicanic and H.
Mang, eds., Zell am See, Austria, pp. 539-550.
11.) Rückert, K. J., “Design and Analysis with Strut-and-Tie Models – Computer-Aided
Methods,” Structural Concrete, IABSE Colloquium, Stuttgart 1991, International Association for
Bridge and Structural Engineering, Zürich, March 1991, pp. 379-384.
12.) Benabdallah, S., Ramirez, J. A., and Lee, R. H., “Computer Graphics in Truss-Model
Design Approach,” Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 3, No. 3, July 1989,
pp. 285-301.
13.) Alshegeir, A. and Ramirez, J. A., “Computer Graphics in Detailing Strut-Tie Models,”
Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, Vol. 6, No. 2, April 1992, pp. 220-232.
14.) Mish, K., Nobari, F., and Liu, D., “An Interactive Graphical strut-and-Tie Application,”
Proceedings of the Second Congress on Computing in Civil Engineering, Mohsen, J. P., ed.,
American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, 1995, pp. 788-795.
15.) Yun, Y. M. and Ramirez, J. A., “Strength of Struts and Nodes in Strut-Tie Model", Journal
of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 122, No. 1, January 1996, pp. 20-29.
16.) Yun, Y. M., “Computer Graphics for Nonlinear Strut-Tie Model Approach,” Journal of
Computing in Civil Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 14, No. 2, April 2000, pp. 127-133.