PROGRAM STUDI PENDIDIKAN BAHASA INGGRIS

JURUSAN STUDI PENDIDIKAN BAHASA INGGRIS

FAKULTAS PENDIDIKAN BAHASA DAN SENI
UNIVERSITAS PENDIDIKAN INDONESIA

Course : Seminar on ELT

Code : IG 596

Chs :2

Semester :7

Prerequisite : Belajar Pembelajaran (IG ), Media Pembelajaran

Bahasa Inggris (IG ), Perencanaan Pembelajaran
Bahasa Inggris (IG ). Evaluasi Pembelajaran Bahasa
Inggris (IG 501)

Lecturer : Prof. Dr. Didi Suherdi, M. Ed.

1. Objectives : This subject is inteneed to provide the students with

opportunities to acquire knowledge and experiemces in
understanding and running, participating in, and
presenting papers in seminars, particularly on English
language teaching.

2. Course Description : This subject is designed to cover knowledge of

seminars inculing running seminars, understanding
seminar themes, developing relevant topics, and
preparing as well as presenting papers. This subject
will also cover designing and developing power point
presentations.

3. Learning Activities : Independent Reading

Lecturing
Students Presentation
Discussion

4. Media : Internet Search Engine

LCD Projector
Laptop Computer
Projector Screen
 5. Evaluation : Written and Oral Presentation

Grading Policy

a. Eighty percent (80%) of attendance is compulsory for the

accomplishment of this subject.

b. Grade will include scores of quizes (20%), paper writing (30%),

presentation (30%), and proposal (20%)

c. Grades will be based on the final scores:

Final Score Interval Grade Mark

85 ≥ A 4.0
75 ≥ -  84 B 3.0
60 ≥ -  74 C 2.0
50 ≥ -  59 D 1.0
... -  50 E 0

SCORING RUBRICS FOR STUDENTS’ PRESENTATION

Approaching Expectations Meeting Expectations Exceeding Expectations
(60-74 marks) (75-85 mark) (85 - marks)
1. Presentation is not well organized and 1. Presentation is somewhat organized 1. Presentation is very well organized and
developed and developed creatively developed
1. Content knowledge is not well articulated 2. Content knowledge is good 2. Content knowledge is excellent
2. Theories and concepts are not discussed in 3. Theories and concepts are discussed 3. Theories and concepts are discussed in
depth in relatively depth depth
3. Presentation is not clear and fluent 4. Presentation is somewhat clear and 4. Presentation is very clear and fluent
4. Shows no confidence in delivery, reading fluent 5. Shows confidence in delivery, reading from
from notes judiciously 5. Shows relatively good confidence in notes judiciously
5. Voice is not well-projected delivery, reading from notes 6. Voice is very well-projected
6. Does not engage the attention of the judiciously 7. Engages the attention of the audience well
audience 6. Voice is relatively well-projected 8. Responds very well to questions, showing
7. Does not respond well to questions, 7. Engages the attention of the audience excellent understanding of the project
showing superficial understanding of the 8. Responds well to questions, showing 9. Clear sense of cohesion in the flow of the
project excellent understanding of the project presentation
8. No sense of cohesion in the flow of the 9. Relatively clear sense of cohesion in 10. Presentation does not exceed time limit
presentation the flow of the presentation and able to complete presentation
9. Presentation exceeds time limit and not 10. Presentation exceeds time limit
able to complete presentation though able to complete presentation

6. Course Outline
 Sessions Topics
1-2 1. Introduction to seminars
and scientific fora.
2. The basic concepts and
terms of seminars and
paper presentation
3-7 Writing seminar papers
8 MID-TERM TESTS
9-14 Presenting papers
Sources
Jolles, R. L., (2005). How to run
seminars and workshops:
presentation skills for
consultants, trainers, and
teachers. New Jersey: John
Wiley and Son, Inc.
http://freearticles.com/article/
Tools-You-Need-In-
Conducting-A-Successful-And-
Profitable-Seminar
Thody, A. (2006). Writing and
presenting research. London:
Sage Publications.
Dignen, B. 1998. Down to
Business English for
Presentation. London: York
Associates.
Feez, S., and Joyce, H. (2000).
Writing Skills Narrative and Non-
fiction Text Types. Putney:
Phoenix Education Pty Ltd.
Kirszner, L. G., and Mandell, S.
R. (1989). Patterns for College
Writing a rethorical reader and
guide 4th Edition. New York: St.
Martin’s Press.
Thody, A. (2006). Writing and
presenting research. London:
Sage Publications.
http://www.uwic.ac.uk/tsu/u_s
tudyskills/unit06.html (How
to Give a Good Seminar
University of Wales Institute)
http://www.comm.toronto.edu
/~frank/guide/guide0.html
(Giving a Talk University of
Toronto)
http://c.s.cornell.edu/cv/Short
Talk.htm (The Short Talk
Cornell University)
 15 Running seminars Jolles, R. L., (2005). How to run
seminars and workshops:
presentation skills for
consultants, trainers, and
teachers. New Jersey: John
Wiley and Son, Inc.

http://web.clas.ufl.rhatch/pag
es/02TeachingResources/read
ingwriting/05surviv.htm
(Seminar Discussions &
Presentations University of
Florida)

16 FINAL TESTS

REFERENCES

Main references:

1. Dignen, B. (1999). Down to Business English for Presentations. London: York

Associates.
2. Feez, S., and Joyce, H. (2000). Writing Skills Narrative and Non-fiction Text
Types. Putney: Phoenix Education Pty Ltd.
3. Jolles, R. L., (2005). How to run seminars and workshops: presentation skills
for consultants, trainers, and teachers. New Jersey: John Wiley and Son, Inc.
4. Kirszner, L. G., and Mandell, S. R. (1989). Patterns for College Writing a
rethorical reader and guide 4th Edition. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
5. Simon, L. (1988). Good Writing a guide and sourcebook for writing across the
curriculum. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
6. Swales, J., and Feak, C. (2004). Academic writing for graduate students. A
course for nonnative speakers of English 2nd Edition. Ann Arbor: University of
Michigan Press.
7. Thody, A. (2006). Writing and presenting research. London: Sage
Publications.

Recommended references:

1. Alwasilah, A. C. (2000). Perspektif Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris di Indonesia

dalam Konteks Persaingan Global. Bandung: CV Andira.
2. Ashton, P. (1988). Teaching higher-order thinking and content: An essential
ingredient in teacher preparation. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida.

3. Bellanca, J., and Brandt, R. (2010). 21st Century Skills: Rethinking How Students
Learn. Bloomington: Solution Tree.
4. Carson, S. H.; Peterson, J. B., Higgins, D. M. (2005). "Reliability, Validity, and Factor
Structure of the Creative Achievement Questionnaire". Creativity Research Journal
17 (1): 37–50.

5. Emilia, E. (2010). Menulis Tesis dan Disertasi. Bandung: Penerbit Alfabeta.

6. Emilia, E. (2010). Developing critical learners: Indonesian and Australian contexts. A

paper (to be) presented in the 57th TEFLIN International Conference "Revitalizing
professionalism in ELT as a response to the globalized world" in Universitas
Pendidikan Indonesia, 1-3 November 2010.

7. Freeman, D. (2010). Language, Technology, and Social Capital: Frames,

Opportunities, and Tools. A paper presented in the Inaugural APEC-RELC
International Seminar Language and Education: An Essential for a Global
Economy, 19-21 April 2010 in RELC Singapore.

8. Graddol, D. (2010). English, Economy, and Employability. A paper presented in

the Inaugural APEC-RELC International Seminar Language and Education: An
Essential for a Global Economy, 19-21 April 2010 in RELC Singapore.

9. Harris, N. S. (2010). Why Aren’t My Students Learning English: Insights and

Solutions from Neuroscience Research. A paper presented in the Inaugural APEC-
RELC International Seminar Language and Education: An Essential for a Global
Economy, 19-21 April 2010 in RELC Singapore.

10. McKnight, P. (2010). Effectiveness of Applied Foreign Languages and

Intercultural Immersion to Enhance Economic Competitiveness. A paper presented
in the Inaugural APEC-RELC International Seminar Language and Education: An
Essential for a Global Economy, 19-21 April 2010 in RELC Singapore.

11. Meek, C. (2010). Preparing Teachers to Prepare Learners for the 21st Century. A
paper presented in the Inaugural APEC-RELC International Seminar Language
and Education: An Essential for a Global Economy, 19-21 April 2010 in RELC
Singapore.

12. Nadkarni, (2010). Creating Prosperity: Using the Internet to Revolutionize

Language Learning. A paper presented in the Inaugural APEC-RELC International
Seminar Language and Education: An Essential for a Global Economy, 19-21
April 2010 in RELC Singapore.

13. Peraturan Pemerintah No. 19 tahun 2005 tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan.

14. Plata, S. (2010). Standards and Assessment for the 21st Century Workforce in an
L2 Nation: the Role of English Teachers in Policy-Making. A paper presented in
the Inaugural APEC-RELC International Seminar Language and Education: An
Essential for a Global Economy, 19-21 April 2010 in RELC Singapore.

15. Poh, T. B. (2010). Helping Students Acquire 21st Century Skills Through the Use
of Q-Matrix. A paper presented in the Inaugural APEC-RELC International
 Seminar Language and Education: An Essential for a Global Economy, 19-21
April 2010 in RELC Singapore.

16. Senior, R. M. (2010). Language Teaching for Tomorrow: Connectivity within and
beyond the Classroom. A paper presented in the Inaugural APEC-RELC
International Seminar Language and Education: An Essential for a Global
Economy, 19-21 April 2010 in RELC Singapore.

17. Suherdi, D. (2001a). Persepsi Guru mengenai Kondisi Faktor-faktor Afektif Siswa
dalam Belajar Bahasa Indonesia. Mimbar Pendidikan Bahasa dan Seni Jurnal
Pendidikan bahasa, seni dan pengajarannya, 1 (1), 1-10.

18. Suherdi, D. (2006b). Peran Sentral Interaksi dalam Proses Belajar-Mengajar

Bahasa. Dalam Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Seni, Vol. 6, No. 1, tahun 2006.

19. Suherdi, D. (2008). Only 2P+2R: An Alternative Route to Successful Teacher In-
service Training. A paper presented in the 6th Asia TEFL International Conference
"Globalizing Asia: The Role of ELT", in Sanur Paradise Plaza Hotel, Bali 1-3
August 2008.

20. Suherdi, D. (2009). Using Mother Languages as the Languages of Instruction in

Indonesia (Towards the Implementation Projects of Mother Languages in
Indonesian Primary Schools). Presented in SEAMEO Meeting “Development of a
Proposal to Pilot the Good Models of Using the Mother Tongue in Teaching and
Learning in Pilot Areas in Indonesia A Planning Meeting” in SEAMEO QITEP in
Language in Jakarta 22-23 June 2009.

21. Suherdi, D. (2009). On Bridging Students’ Learning in First Grades Using Mother
Tongue a Case of Sundanese Classrooms. Presented in Regional Meeting on the
Dissemination of Project Results and Identification of Good Functioning Models,
Arnoma Hotel Bangkok, Thailand 22-24 February 2009.

22. Suherdi, D. (2010). Country Report on Planning and Developing MTB-MLE in

Indonesia. Presented in Regional Training Workshop on the Principles and
Methods of Developing and Using Curricula and Teaching-Learning Materials for
Non-Dominant Languages for SEAMEO MLE Trainers. SEAMEO INNOTECH,
Quezon City, Philippines August 23-September 1, 2010.

23. Suherdi, D. (2010). Towards the 21st English Teacher Education: An Altenarnative
Model. Presented in the 57th TEFLIN International Conference "Revitalizing
professionalism in ELT as a response to the globalized world" in Universitas
Pendidikan Indonesia 1-3 November 2010.

24. Suherdi, D. (2010). Placing Mother Tongue in Its Place: Equity for the Majority.
Presented in International Symposium on Language Planning in 21st Century:
Constraints and Challenges in Hotel Sari Pan Facific, Jakarta 2-4 November 2010.

25. Suherdi, D. (2011). Making the Best Use of RSBI: An alternative solution British
Council Symposium on RSBI/SBI in Century Park Hotel Jakarta 9-10 Maret 2011.
 26. Suherdi, D. (2011). Pilot Project on the Use of Mother Tongue as a Bridge
Language in Primary Education in Indonesia. Presented in the End-of-Project
Conference in Royal Queen’s Park Hotel Bangkok 23-25 Februari 2011.

27. Trilling, B., and Fadel, C. (2009). 21st Century Skills, Learning for Life in Our
Times. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass.

28. Weng, C. Y. (2010). Intertextual Reading: Managing and Processing Information in

a Globalized Knowledge-Economy. A paper presented in the Inaugural APEC-
RELC International Seminar Language and Education: An Essential for a Global
Economy, 19-21 April 2010 in RELC Singapore.

Internet Sources:

1. http://freearticles.com/article/Tools-You-Need-In-Conducting-A-
Successful-And-Profitable-Seminar

2. http://www.uwic.ac.uk/tsu/u_studyskills/unit06.html (How to Give a

Good Seminar University of Wales Institute)

3. http://www.comm.toronto.edu/~frank/guide/guide0.html (Giving a
Talk University of Toronto)

4. http://web.clas.ufl.rhatch/pages/02TeachingResources/readingwritin
g/05surviv.htm (Seminar Discussions & Presentations University of
Florida)

5. http://c.s.cornell.edu/cv/ShortTalk.htm (The Short Talk Cornell

University)

COURSE UNITS

Session Specific Learning

Topics Objectives Evaluation Sources
s Activities
1 Introduction Be able to Lecture (2 Main
to seminars understand hours) Class reference
the nature of elicitation no. 3
seminars and
scientific fora Internet
2 Basic Be able to Lecture (2 Quiz Source
Concepts understand hours) No. 1
and Terms basic
concepts of
seminars and
scientific fora
3 Understand Be able to Workshop Quiz Main
-ing understand (2 hours) reference
seminar seminar no. 7
themes themes
4 Developing Be able to Workshop Seminar Recom-
relevant develop (2 Hours) Leaflet and mended
topics relevant Brochure Reference
topics Review No. 5, 7-
5 Developing Be able to Workshop Written 12, 13-16,
paper analyze (2 hours) outlines 28
outlines segments of
classroom Recom-
discourse mended
analysis Reference
6 Writing Be able to Workshop Paper No. 1-5,
paper analyze (2 hours) drafts 17-26,
drafts segments of
classroom Recom-
discourse mended
analysis Reference
7 Editing and Be able to Workshop Seminar No. 23-27
finalizing edit and (2 hours) Paper
papers finalize
papers

8 MID-TERM TEST
9 Designing Be able to Workshop Presentatio Main
paper design paper (2 hours) n design Reference
presentatio presentataion s No. 1
ns and 3
10 Develop Be able to Workshop Power point Internet
power point develop (2 hours) slides Sources
presentatio effective No. 2-5
n power point
11 Rehearsing Be able to Workshop Peer ratings
presentatio rehearse (2 hours)
ns presentations
12 Paper Be able to Workshop Perfrorman
presentatio present a (2 hours) ce
n (1) paper assessment
effectively
13 Paper Be able to Workshop Perfrorman
presentatio present a (2 hours) ce
n (2) paper assessment
effectively
14 Paper Be able to Workshop Perfrorman
presentatio present a (2 hours) ce
n (3) paper assessment
effectively
15 Running Be able to Workshop Seminar Main
 productive plan a (2 hours) proposal references
seminars seminar No, 3

16 FINAL TESTS