Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CHAPTER THREE
3. COMPRESSION MEMBERS
3.1. Introduction
Compression members are perhaps the most common structural elements in an ordinary
structure and are variously termed as columns, posts, struts or stanchions, etc. A structural
member is considered to be a compression member if it is designed primarily to resist axial
compression, though some bending may also be present and accounted for in the design. If
the bending action is quite significant, the member is termed as a beam-column and designed
in a different way.
Structural action of columns, stanchions, struts and posts is identical; but due to difference in
their usage different names are used.
Columns are ordinarily used in buildings, are vertical and transmit some actual load or
beam reaction to another column or foundation.
Stanchions are steel columns made of rolled steel sections (usually built – up) and
carry heavy loads.
Struts on the other hand are not necessarily vertical and are used as compression
members in roof trusses and bridge trusses. The term post is loosely used for a column
but the end member of a bridge truss is known as the end-post. Similarly, the main
compression members of a roof truss are known as “rafters”.
Under the general category of compression members could be included columns, compression
members in a trussed structure, component parts of frames such as compression flanges of
beams or plate girders.
The two main differences between tension and compression members are:
Compression members can fail by yielding, inelastic buckling, or elastic buckling depending
on the slenderness ratio of the members as well as in local buckling that is usually influenced
by the relative thickness of the component elements that constitute the cross section. Members
with low slenderness ratios generally tend to fail by yielding, whereas members with high
slenderness ratios tend to fail by elastic buckling. Most compression members used in
construction have intermediate slenderness ratios, and so the predominant mode of failure is
inelastic buckling.
Member buckling can occur in one of three different modes: flexural, torsional, and flexural-
torsional.
The classification of a cross-section depends on the width to thickness ratio of the parts
subject to compression. Compression parts include every part of a cross-section which is
either totally or partially in compression under the load combination considered. The various
compression parts in a cross-section (such as a web or flange) can, in general, be in different
classes. A cross-section is classified according to the highest (least favourable) class of its
compression parts. The limiting proportions for Class 1, 2, and 3 compression parts should be
obtained from Table 5.2 of EN 1993-1-1, shown as Table 3.1 here. A part which fails to
satisfy the limits for Class 3 should be taken as Class 4.
The effective areas of flat compression elements should be obtained using Table 4.1 of EN
1993-1-5: 2004 for internal elements and Table 4.2 of EN 1993-1-5 : 2004 for outstand
elements. The effective area of the compression zone of a plate with the gross cross-sectional
area A should be obtained from:
Aeff A 3-1
is the stress ratio determined in accordance with section 4.4 of EN 1993-1-5: 2004
b is the appropriate width to be taken as follows:
bw for webs;
b for internal flange elements (except RHS);
b-3t for flanges of RHS;
c for outstand flanges;
h for equal-leg angles;
h for unequal-leg angles;
kσ is the buckling factor corresponding to the stress ratio and boundary conditions.
For long plates, kσ is given in Table 4.1 or Table 4.2 of EN 1993-1-5 : 2004.
t is the thickness
σcr is the elastic critical plate buckling stress see equation (A.1) in Annex A.1(2) and Table
4.1 and Table4.2 of EN 1993-1-5: 2004.
For flange elements of I-sections and box girders the stress ratio used in Table 4.1 or
Table 4.2 of EN1993-1-5:2004 should be based on the properties of the gross cross-sectional
area, due allowance being made for shear lag in the flanges if relevant. For web elements the
stress ratio used in Table 4.1 of EN 1993-1-5:2004 should be obtained using a stress
distribution based on the effective area of the compression flange and the gross area of the
web.
The effective length factor, k is a factor which, when multiplied by the actual unbraced length
L of an end-restrained compression member, will yield an equivalent pinned-ended member
whose buckling strength is the same as that of the original end-restrained member.
For a prismatic member, the effective length factor can be determined from different methods
as discussed in following successive pages:
( EI / L) columns
( EI / L) beams
3-5
Note that if the end of the member is fixed, the theoretical value of G is 0, but a G value of 1
is recommended for use. On the other hand, if the end of the member is pinned, the
theoretical value of G is infinity, but a G value of 10 is recommended for use. The rational
behind the foregoing recommendations is that no support in reality can be truly fixed or
pinned.
Once the G factors are calculated, the effective length factor can be obtained from the
appropriate alignment chart. The chart for sideways-inhibited frames applies to frames that
are braced in such a way that relative displacement between two ends of the member is
negligible. The chart for side sway-inhibited frames applies to frames in which relative
displacement between member ends is not negligible. Although the charts were developed
assuming elastic behaviour for all members, inelasticity in the columns can be accounted for
by multiply the end-restrained factors by the quantity Et/ E, where Et is the tangent modulus.
The alignment charts shown in Fig 3.7 where developed based on a number of simplifying
assumptions; as a result, they do not always give accurate results, especially for members in
L ( P EI )
frames for which the parameter varies significantly from column to column in a
given story. The alignment charts also fail to give accurate results for frames that contain
leaner columns.
1. For the theoretical models shown in the next pages the distribution factors 1 and 2
is given by,
kc
1 3-6(a)
k c k11 k12
kc
2 3-6(b)
k c k 21 k 22
Where, kc is the column stiffness I/L.
kij is the effective beam stiffness coefficient
2. For continous columns shown in the next pages the distribution factors 1 and 2 is
given by,
k c k1
1 3-7(a)
k c k1 k11 k12
kc k2
2 3-7(a)
k c k 2 k 21 k 22
Table 3-4 Effective stiffness coefficients for beams not subjected to axial loads.
a) In Non-sway Mode
I
0.5 0.14(1 2 ) 0.055(1 2 ) 2 3-8(a)
L
Or
I 1 0.145(1 2 ) 0.265(1 2 )
3-8(b)
L 2 0.364(1 2 ) 0.2471 2
b) In Sway Mode
0.5
I 1 0.2(1 2 ) 0.12(1 2 )
3-9
L 1 0.8(1 2 ) 0.601 2
N cr l EI
2
2 3-10
e
Elastic critical buckling load is derived for the simply supported column under axial
compressive load.
From Figure 3.10(c), using equilibrium,
Fx 0 N F ( x) 0 → F ( x) N
Fz 0 V A S ( x) 0 → S ( x ) 0 since VA = 0.
M 0 CCW+
A M ( x) F ( x) w( x) 0
M ( x) N w( x) 0 (3-10-1)
Figure 3.10 Representation of: (a) undeflected geometries of Column, (b) deflected
geometries of Column and (c) “cut” column with resultant loads
N N
Let, 2 →
EI EI
Now we can write the solution for the ODE in Equation (3-10-4) as:
N N
w( x) A cos x B sin x
EI EI
For simply supported column,
w 0
d 2w
@x 0 2
d w EI 0
2
M 0 EI dx
dx 2
w 0
d 2w
@x L d w EI
2 0
M 0 EI dx 2
dx 2
N N
w( x) A cos x B sin x
EI EI
dw N N N N
A sin x B cos x recall that (sin x)' cos x
dx EI EI EI EI
d 2w N N N N
2
A cos x B sin x
dx EI EI EI EI
N N
@x 0 w 0 A cos x B sin x 0 →A = 0.
EI EI
d 2w N N N N N
2
0 A cos x B sin x 0 → B sin x0
dx EI EI EI EI EI
N N N
@x L w 0 A cos L B sin L 0 → B sin L0
EI EI EI
d 2w N N N N N N
2
0 A cos L B sin L 0→ B sin L0
dx EI EI EI EI EI EI
N
B 0 B 0 (trivial solution)
EI
N N
sin L 0→ L n where, n is an integer.
EI EI
Buckling occurs in simply supported column if,
n 2 2 EI
N ------Eigen Values
L2
n x
w B sin -----Eigen modes
L
n=1 2 EI
N1
L2
n=2 4 2 EI
N2
L2
n=3 9 2 EI
N3
L2
N cr l EI
2
2 , where, le is effective (critical) length.
e
To take into account the various imperfections which the Euler formula does not allow for,
the Eurocode uses the Perry-Robertson approach. Table 1 shows the checks required for both
slender and stocky columns:
Table 3-5 Resistance checks required for slender and stocky columns
Non-dimensional slenderness,
For sections with classes 1, 2 and 3:
Af y le 1
or 3-17
N cr i 1
Where i is radius of gyration given by i I A
1 E f y 93.9 3-19
Imperfection factor,
is an imperfection factor, first you will need to determine the required buckling curve from
Table 6.2 and refer to Table 6.1 to get the value of .
Table 3-6 Imperfection Factor (Table 6.1 of EN 1993-1-1)
Buckling ao A b C d
Curve
Imperfection 0.13 0.21 0.34 0.49 0.76
factor,
Reduction Factor,
1
0.5
1.0 3-20
2
2
Where,
2
0.51 ( 0.2) 3-21
Alternatively, may be read from Figure 3.10 (Figure 6.4 of EN 1993-1-1) by using and
the required buckling curve.
NOTE: Nc.Rd, design compression resistance of the cross-section, taken as a smaller of either
the uniform compression force, Nc,Rd of the gross section from Equation 3.12 (for class 1, 2
and 3 sections) and Equation 3.13 (for class 4 sections) or the design local buckling
resistance, Nb,Rd of the gross section from Equation 3.15 (for class 1, 2 and 3 sections) and
Equation 3.16 (for class 4 sections)
Table 3-7 Selection of buckling curve for a cross-section (Table 6.2 of EN 1993-1-1)