Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Social Contagion of Astrol-Ogy in The Social Media Amid COVID-19 Pandemic
Social Contagion of Astrol-Ogy in The Social Media Amid COVID-19 Pandemic
net/publication/351250044
CITATIONS READ
0 1
6 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Motivations to Pursue a Seabased Career: Empirical Evidence from Filipino Captains and Cadets in the Norwegian-controlled shipping sector. View project
E-learning Outreach Program for Public Basic Education in the Philippines: View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Myla Arcinas on 01 May 2021.
Research Article
How to cite:
Lopez, K. R. B., Gaticales, N. P., Provido, A. V. C., Santelices, S. M. B., & Arcinas, M. M. (2021). Social Contagion of Astrol-
ogy in the Social Media amid COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and
Education Research. 2(4), 404 – 418. doi: 10.11594/ijmaber.02.04.08
Lopez et al., 2021/ Social Contagion of Astrology in the Social Media amid COVID-19 Pandemic
feature on the tabloid (Smallwood, 2019). Pan- ogy demonstrates social media's role in pro-
demics were also considered as times of crisis moting beliefs, concepts, and ideas by offering
where State dilemmas, such as economic de- readings to influence people across the globe
cline, arise (Smallwood, 2019). These times (McKoy, 2019).
brought uncertainty and ambiguity since there Acknowledging the premises behind the
exists a sense of perplexity on the current people's belief in Astrology owing to the Bar-
events and on the future in which uncertainty num effect, the study infers that individual con-
strongly influences (Beck, 2018). scious behavioral responses (e.g., online shar-
Social media's prominence granted people ing and spreading of astrology-related content)
a modern form of distraction that detracts contribute to social contagion since the com-
them from the macabre reality, which also mitted acts are innately influential. Given the
paved the way for Astrology to expand its sub- implicit relationship of their conscious behav-
scribers by using hyper-personalized content ioral responses (CBR) to propagating the ideol-
to interest them (Namaste, 2019). People are ogy, the researchers aim to dig deeper into
becoming discontented with strict religious these subjects to determine the association of
and cultural frameworks in society. They often the Barnum effect and Social Contagion.
seek hope, individuality, and pleasure, which The study also aimed to contribute to the
they found in Astrology, for it served as a means low amount of Astrology literature in the Phil-
of therapy and in-depth exploration of them- ippines as the prominence of horoscopes in the
selves without restrictions from society or reli- country's context urges more studies. It insti-
gion (McKoy, 2019). gates an incoherence in studying the Filipino
Younger generations appeal to Astrology in culture of social media use and their unique ad-
social media because of certain factors: (a) aptation of cultures espoused from the West.
most platforms are free and accessible, (b) as- Furthermore, consumption as a process alone
trological memes and threads not only enter- necessitates scrutinization since media content
tain them but also allow the easy propagation is prone to propagating information disorgani-
of information globally, and (c) social media al- zation (i.e., misinformation, disinformation,
lows users to subscribe to other astrologers in- and misinformation). Conforming to how the
triguing their interests (McKoy, 2019). Despite study values information consumer behavior, it
having the quality of relationships as an essen- should serve as a basis regarding the relation-
tial factor in the proliferation of Astrology ship between Astrology and its patrons, provid-
through Social Contagion, the contagion may ing a reasonable premise to measure the level
vary when it comes to social media. Social me- of susceptibility of people to the Barnum effect.
dia interactions occur with open access and in-
terdependent networks, which provide the Methods
ubiquity of influence and social contagion
Research design
(McFarland & Ployhart, 2015). Tiryakian
This study employed a quantitative correla-
(1972) also discovered that Post-Millennials'
tional, non-experimental research design. Us-
usage of social media is driven by (a) environ-
ing a cross-sectional self-administered online
mental factors such as political, economic, tech-
survey, the study determined the association of
nological, cultural, and legal; and (b) personal
the Filipino Post-Millennial university stu-
factors such as socioeconomic class, morals,
dents' extent of Social contagion - Conscious
choices, age/maturity, and culture/subculture.
Behavioral Response (CBR) to Astrology on so-
With this, Tiryakian inferred a higher level of
cial media with their demographics, Stress
proliferation of astrological concepts among
Level (SL), and Level of Susceptibility to Bar-
Post-Millennials who were able to attain higher
num effect (LSB) during the COVID-19 pan-
education levels, e.g., college and university
demic.
level, than those who have not yet attained or
are still in high school level (Tiryakian, 1972).
Sampling and ethical considerations
Overall, this increasing recognition of Astrol-
The researchers used a purposive non-
Disagree (means Very Low); 2: Disagree (Low); Table 1. Profile/Demographics of Filipino Post-
3: Agree (High); 4: Strongly Agree (Very High). Millennial University Students (n = 406)
For the Intake Phase of social contagion spreads information relating to a subject, e.g.,
(the process wherein people absorb infor- Astrology), the sample only had an average
mation related to a particular subject, e.g., As- score. Not too often nor too rarely, the respond-
trology; the first step to social contagion), the ents only post content related to astrology
sample scored high. The sample is frequently sometimes. Additionally, it is noticeable that
encountered, viewed, and interacted with As- the sample prefers: (a) reposting/reblogging
trology posts through their preferred social already-made content about it as opposed to
networking sites. The results imply that there making original ones, and (b) more private con-
is indeed a considerably broad reach of online tent-sharing: sending related posts through
Astrology related content on people that share private messaging than publishing posts in
similar demographic characteristics. public signified by the difference in the median
For the Output Phase of social contagion score (3.00 for private distribution of content
(wherein the sample actively distributes and and 2.00 for public posting).
Table 2. Stress Levels of Respondents in the Last Month (October 2020) (n=406)
Demographics and CBR tor Scores than males (p-value 0.000). There-
Table 5 shows CBR Factor Scores, which are fore, females are more likely to involve
unequal in terms of sex. Using the Mann-Whit- themselves with astrology-related content
ney U Test (Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test), the ob- online and participate in its social contagion
servation from the data concludes at a p<.05 than males.
that females have significantly higher CBR Fac- For variables of religion, type of residence,
and age, results show no sufficient evidence to
IJMABER 410 Volume 2 | Number 4 | April | 2021
Lopez et al., 2021/ Social Contagion of Astrology in the Social Media amid COVID-19 Pandemic
conclude a significant difference between the the sample's Age and CBR, which concludes to
sample's CBR Factor Scores in correspondence no statistically significant association regard-
with their respective p-values: 0.128, 0.736, ing the monotonic relationship between the
and 0.339. two (p-value 0.360) at p<.05.
Additionally, the researchers have also per-
formed Spearman's Rank-Order Correlation on
the way for Astrology to widen its reach as rect weak but significant monotonic relation-
more individuals consider it as their cop- ship between CBR Factor Scores and SL Factor
ing/defense mechanism against doubt, for it Scores on Management was observed (p-values
provides them clarity through its descriptions <0.000). On the other hand, between CBR Fac-
(Biswas, 2020). With people being instructed tor Scores and Stress Level Factor Scores on
to stay home during this time, their usage of so- Control, no significant monotonic relationship
cial media becomes prevalent, for it also acts as was found (p-value 0.025).
a form of distraction from the pandemic's grim It is also noteworthy that the following sig-
reality, which also propagates Astrology to nificant relationships within the Stress Level
more subscribers (Namaste, 2019). Factors were observed: (a) Inverse moderate
In line with this, Table 6 shows a direct relationship between Uncertainty and Control,
weak but significant monotonic relationship (b) Direct moderate relationship between Un-
between CBR Factor Scores and SL Factor certainty and Management, and (c) Inverse
Scores about Uncertainty. Likewise, another di- moderate relationship between Control and
Management.
CBR vs. Demographics and SL Factor Point Score are 1.34, 1.30, and 1.25
Analyzing the ordinal response variable us- times, respectively, than obtaining a 4. It also
ing the ordered logit model yielded to final four follows the same odds of obtaining a 4 versus 3,
significant predictors. Table 7 denotes the fol- 3 versus 2, and 2 versus 1, and (4) This implies
lowing: (1) If the sex is male, the odds of obtain- that the higher the SL Factor Scores, the higher
ing a 5 in CBR Factor Point Score is 0.37 times the CBR Factor Point Score will be.
(likelihood is reduced to nearly one-third) than Consequently, the more stressed a person is
obtaining a 4, holding other variables constant. based on stress level assessment, the more that
It also follows the same odds of obtaining a 4 he/she will engage in accessing, consuming,
versus 3, 3 versus 2, and 2 versus 1, (2) This and sharing astrology content. This poses a sig-
also implies that females tend to have a larger nificant connection with Dunwoody’s explana-
CBR Factor Point Score than males. Females tion in Kim Witte’s Extended Parallel Process
tend to access, consume, and share astrology- Model (Dunwoody, 2020): that stress can lead
related media more than males, (3) For various to seeking escapism during pandemics. In this
SL Factor Scores for Uncertainty, Control, and case, engrossing in Astrology shows a way of
Management, the odds of obtaining a 5 in CBR escapism.
Table 7. Ordinal Logistic Regression Analysis of CBR vs. Demographics & Stress Levels (n = 406)
CBR vs. LSB are more likely to consume and interact with
To see the influence of CBR towards LSB, astrology-related content due to their external
the calculated LSB Factor Point Score, as shown locus of control, making them perceive gener-
in Table 9, is regressed against CBR Factor alized personality statements (i.e., astrological
Score using an ordered logit model. The initial statements) as accurate self-descriptions (Glick
model is also the final model since there is only et al., 1989). Their tendency to have "theory-
one predictor: the CBR Factor Score. driven" approaches in people's perception that
Per unit increase in CBR Factor Score, the make them distort perceived information to fit
odds of obtaining a 5 in LSB Factor Point Score their personalities may also be a factor (Glick et
is multiplied by 3.83 times versus obtaining a 4. al., 1989). Their egoistic nature (which makes
The same odds also hold for obtaining a 4 ver- them choose self-interested actions/thoughts)
sus 3, 3 versus 2, and 2 versus 1 (lowest). (Chung, 2016) can also be considered a rele-
This implies that the higher the CBR Factor vant perspective.
Score, the higher the LSB Factor Point Score is. The prominence of social media, especially
Those who access, consume, and share astrol- at this time, broadened the social contagion
ogy-related content tend to have a higher level (McFarland & Ployhart, 2015) of Astrology.
of susceptibility to the Barnum effect. People
Thus, making it easier for people to access con- same odds of obtaining a 4 versus 3, 3 versus 2,
tent related to such. Altogether, the features and 2 versus 1.
mentioned above influence people to become This implies that the higher the SL Factor
more invested in consuming astrological con- Scores, the higher the LSB Factor Point Score
tent while simultaneously manifesting their will be. The more stressed a person is based on
susceptibility to the Barnum effect of the pseu- stress level assessment, the more susceptible
dosciences such as Astrology in the process of to the Barnum effect. Psychological distress be-
social contagion. comes prevalent during pandemics; people are
likely prone to stress, isolation, and fear
Demographics and SL vs. LSB (Rosen, Glassman, & Morland, 2020). Such fac-
Analyzing the ordinal response variable us- tors can lead them to seek escapism through
ing the ordered logit model, as shown in Table fixation on other 'unaccounted' aspects of their
10, resulted in the final three significant predic- lives (Dunwoody, 2020). Consumption of pseu-
tors, which is similar to the previous result dosciences such as Astrology becomes a coping
when CBR Factor Score is regressed to LSB Fac- mechanism since: (a) this brings benefit to peo-
tor Point Score: (1) If the sex is male, the odds ple's lack of control over the situation, and (b)
of obtaining a 5 in LSB Factor Point Score is it serves as a way to deal with their doubt by
0.37 times (likelihood is reduced to nearly one- providing 'clarity' with their self-concept ex-
third) than obtaining a 4, holding other varia- pression (Biswas, 2020).
bles constant. It also follows the same odds of Delving more into related trends, Small-
obtaining a 4 versus 3, 3 versus 2, and 2 versus wood (2019) took an assertion with astrology's
1, (2). This also implies that females tend to prominence in times of uncertainty. They
have a larger LSB Factor Point Score than claimed that this is mainly due to economic de-
males. Since Sex is a binary variable, the con- cline and political panic brought by pandemics.
verse of the baseline is true for the other out- Hence, it can be denoted that stress causes peo-
come. Females tend to access, consume, and ple to have an impaired sense of external loci,
share astrology-related media more than urging them to rely on content that may pro-
males, (3) On SL Factor Scores for Control and vide them comfort and tranquility, especially at
Management, the odds of obtaining a 5 in LSB times of uncertainty.
Factor Point Score are 1.25, and 1.44 times, re-
spectively, than obtaining a 4. It also follows the
Table 10. Ordinal Logistic Regression Analysis of Demographics and SL vs. LSB (n = 406)
key concepts and foundations of an inquiry. Forer, B. R. (1949). The fallacy of personal validation: a
Such knowledge helped them research with a classroom demonstration of gullibility. The Journal
of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 44(1), 118–
strong background. To Mr. Lambert Yancy Gar- 123. doi:10.1037/h0059240
ganta, their homeroom adviser, for contrib- Foster, C. (2020). FOSTER: Quarantine may lead to wider
uting to their research processes. He extended social media addiction. The Daily Targum.
his support and assistance by forwarding the https://www.dailytargum.com/arti-
cle/2020/04/foster-quarantine-may-lead-to-
researchers’ concerns to their respective re- wider-social-media-addiction
search coordinator, and mentor. Gearon, M. (2018). Cognitive Biases — The Barnum Effect.
Lastly, but never the least, the group wishes Medium. https://me-
to thank every member of De La Salle Univer- dium.com/@michaelgearon/cognitive-biases-the-
barnum-effect-b051e7b8e029
sity-Integrated School Manila's academic com- Glick, P., Gottesman, D., & Jolton, J. (1989). The Fault is not
munity in upholding a conducive and healthy in the Stars. Personality and Social Psychology Bul-
learning environment for the students, provid- letin, 15(4), 572–583.
ing access to multiple academic journals, doi:10.1177/0146167289154010
Hawryluck, L., Gold, W. L., Robinson, S., Pogorski, S., Galea,
providing funds to be used for research en- S., & Styra, R. (2004). SARS control and psychologi-
deavors, and guiding the researchers through- cal effects of quarantine, Toronto, Canada. Emerg-
out the making of this study. Because of them, ing infectious diseases, 10(7), 1206–1212.
the proponents were able to secure the safety https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1007.030703
Lyons, L. (2005). Paranormal beliefs come (super)natu-
and formality of their research while retaining
rally to some. Gallup. https://news.gal-
qualities of ethicality, organization, scholarli- lup.com/poll/19558/paranormal-beliefs-come-su-
ness, and relevance. pernaturally-some.aspx
Marsden, P. (1998). Memetics & Social Contagion: Two
Sides of the Same Coin? The Journal of Memetics:
References Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
Allum, N. (2010). What Makes Some People Think Astrol-
1998, 2(2), 171-185. https://web.stan-
ogy Is Scientific? Science Communication, 33(3),
ford.edu/~kcarmel/CC_Be-
341–366. doi:10.1177/1075547010389819
havChange_Course/readings/Additional%20Re-
Beck, J. (2018). The New Age of Astrology. The Atlantic.
sources/social%20contagion/Social%20Conta-
https://www.theatlantic.com/health/ar-
gion.htm
chive/2018/01/the-new-age-of-astrol-
McFarland, L. A., & Ployhart, R. E. (2015). Social media: A
ogy/550034/
contextual framework to guide research and prac-
Biswas, S. (2020). Astrology's booming amid pandemic
tice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(6), 1653–
uncertainty. Times of India. https://timeso-
1677. doi:10.1037/a0039244
findia.indiatimes.com/life-style/spotlight/astrolo-
McKoy, K. (2019). Astrology in the social media age. The
gys-booming-amid-pandemic-uncertainty/arti-
Stony Brook Press.
cleshow/78117861.cms
http://sbpress.com/2019/05/astrology-in-the-so-
Chung, H. (2016). Psychological Egoism and Hobbes.
cial-media-age/
Filozofia, 71(3), 197-208. http://www.klem-
Namaste, J. (2019). The Internet Changed Astrology. Then
ens.sav.sk/fiusav/doc/filozofia/2016/3/197-
Came the Memes. WIRED.
208.pdf
https://www.wired.com/story/astrology-and-the-
Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., & Mermelstein, R. (1994). Per-
internet/
ceived stress scale. Measuring stress: A guide for
Robinson, L., & Smith, M. (2020). Dealing with Uncertainty
health and social scientists. Journal of Health and
During the Coronavirus Pandemic. Help Guide.
Social Behavior, 24, 386-396. http://www.mind-
https://www.helpguide.org/articles/anxi-
garden.com/documents/PerceivedStressScale.pdf
ety/dealing-with-uncertainty.htm.
De Vos J. (2020). The effect of COVID-19 and subsequent
Roos, D. (2020). How 5 of History's Worst Pandemics Fi-
social distancing on travel behavior. Transporta-
nally Ended. History. https://www.his-
tion Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 5,
tory.com/news/pandemics-end-plague-cholera-
100121.
black-death-smallpox
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2020.100121
Rosen, C. S., Glassman, L. H., & Morland, L. A. (2020).
Dickson, D. H., & Kelly, I. W. (1985). The “Barnum Effect”
Telepsychotherapy during a pandemic: A traumatic
in Personality Assessment: A Review of the Litera-
stress perspective. Journal of Psychotherapy Inte-
ture. Psychological Reports, 57(2), 367–382.
gration, 30(2), 174–187. https://doi.org/2020-
doi:10.2466/pr0.1985.57.2.367
39749-003
Dunwoody, S. (2020). Science Journalism and Pandemic
Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal
Uncertainty. Media and Communication, 8(2), 471–
versus external control of reinforcement. Psycho-
474. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i2.3224
logical Monographs: General and Applied, 80(1), 1–
28. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0092976
Smallwood, C. (2019). Astrology in the Age of Uncertainty. Clinical Psychology, 45(1), 104–114.
The New Yorker. doi:10.1037/0022-006x.45.1.104
https://www.newyorker.com/maga- Tiryakian, E. A. (1972). Toward the Sociology of Esoteric
zine/2019/10/28/astrology-in-the-age-of-uncer- Culture. American Journal of Sociology, 78(3), 491–
tainty 512. doi:10.1086/225361
Snyder, C. R., Shenkel, R. J., & Lowery, C. R. (1977). Ac-
ceptance of personality interpretations: The “Bar-
num effect” and beyond. Journal of Consulting and