Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Total Quality Management / Kaizen / Continuous Improvement
Total Quality Management / Kaizen / Continuous Improvement
Background
Economic development in the world today is very rapid considering how
many new companies are starting to grow and develop not only in the country,
but also have flapped their wings into the international arena. From these
economic developments there is certainly economic competition in the world and
between companies to become the first company and get the attention of
consumers in the world. This inevitably requires workers who are in a company to
develop or develop their ideas to become a growing company. The work
demands most of the management in anticipating the development of the world
economy.
*
University of Technology Krungthep, Thailand
**
Universitas Buana Perjuangan Karawang, Indonesia
214
grow and maintain the company's image, full attention to quality will have a
positive impact on increasing the company's sales.
Japan is a country that proposes the TQM concept which is then accepted
and used in various parts of the world. The TQM concept has been widely
adopted by companies in various countries, including Indonesia. William Edwards
Deming is a name that has a very high reputation in Japan. Its contribution is very
significant in the progress of the Japanese economy. The industrial and business
world in Japan has succeeded globally, because of its teachings about total
quality control. The lessons taught by Deming are:
a. Creating constant goals in improving the quality of competitive
products, excelling in competition
b. Dare to change to take responsibility in leading and facing challenges
c. Reducing dependence on supervision by building high-quality
production systems
d. Minimize overall costs and build trusted relationships with suppliers
e. Creating an education system for employee self-development, job
training and leadership
f. Encourage supervision that helps people and machines work better
g. Eliminate worries and anxieties so that people work effectively
h. Eliminating barriers between departments so that all employees work
together with each other well.
This study seeks to describe the forerunner of Total Quality Management
(TQM) in Japanese companies and their implementation in companies in
Indonesia, by analyzing the critical factors that support and hinder the
effectiveness of these implementations.
Methods
This research method uses description analysis with a survey approach.
This research is a qualitative research that uses observation and literature study
techniques. Observation is a way of collecting data by direct observation and
systematic recording of the object to be studied. Observations were carried out by
researchers by observing and recording the implementation of HR management
practices in Japanese-based multinational companies in Jakarta and Bekasi,
especially those related to Total Quality Management (TQM). While the literature
study is any effort made by researchers to gather information that is relevant to
216
the topic or problem that will or is being studied. That information can be
obtained from scientific books, research reports, scientific essays, theses and
dissertations, regulations, provisions, yearbooks, encyclopedias, and written
sources both printed and other electronics.
Literature study is an activity that cannot be separated from a study. The
theories underlying the problem and the fields to be studied can be found by
conducting library studies. In addition, a researcher can obtain information about
similar studies or those that have to do with his research. And studies that have
been done before. By conducting library studies, researchers can utilize all
information and thoughts that are relevant to their research. To conduct a library
study, the library is an appropriate place to obtain relevant materials and
information to be collected, read and studied, recorded and utilized (Roth, 1986).
Results
TQM Is an Implementation of Spiritual Guidelines for Japanese
Companies Based on the Teachings of Buddhism
Some authors argue that Japan uniquely adopted TQM because of the
influence of its cultural values and industrial history (Boje & Winsor, 1993; Ishikawa,
1985). To reinforce this argument, first of all, the role of Japanese spirituality in
Japanese culture will be explained. Despite radical changes in the country in the
last 200 years, Japan has maintained a respect for its religious foundation, so that
Buddhism, Confucianism and Shinto remain central to Japanese religious practice.
Most modern Japanese companies are usually two or even three of these beliefs,
and are more expressed in participation in ritual rather than philosophy / theology
and doctrine (Reader et al., 1993 : 33).
Original belief from Japan, Shinto, remains a belief for the Kingdom of
Japan. The main characteristic of Shinto is the animism belief in our spirit which
fills the world, which inhabits all life such as mountains, rocks, rivers, etc. (Reader,
et al., 1993 : 6). This belief dominates Shinto practices, leading to strong attention
to pollution and purification rituals (Reader, et al., 1993 : 34). Chinese philosophy,
known in the West as Confucianism into Japan in the sixth century and a
hierarchical understanding of social order is still the main influence on social
ethics and relations norms and daily behavior (Varley, 1974 : 39). Buddhism, also
dating to Japan in the sixth century, but did not become a popular religion until
the Kamakura Period (1185-1333), when it was later popularized as a religion
217
imperfection of life, the view that nothing can satisfy is a basic assumption. This
was implied by the first nobel of the four Buddhist nobles - endless suffering. The
acceptance of this belief is not seen as nihilistic, but rather is seen as evidence to
fertilize someone. Other related activities are continuous improvement, which is
directly related to Zen Buddhism. Zen in Kaizen refers to the practice of good
things or benefits in an impersonal way, while kai refers to efforts to create
change. Thus, Kaizen talks about improvement, but it usually means the effort
being made to achieve impersonal benefits (Lincoln, 1989). In pursuing an
impersonal virtue, according to Zen emphasizes continuous hard work to achieve
enlightenment (Stupak, 1999: 428), but still remains consistent with the emphasis
of TQM. The main characteristics of Kaizen management include paying more
attention to the production process and not results, cross functional management
and using quality circles and other tools to support continuous improvement
(Cane, 1998: 27).
Kaizen is always in line with Total Quality Management (TQM). Even before
the Total Quality Management philosophy is implemented or before the quality
system can be implemented within a company, this philosophy will not be
implemented so that the continuous improvement (Just In Time) is an effort that
is inherent in the philosophy of Total Quality Managment itself.
The key to the superiority of Japanese companies is that they are very
superior in competition, one of its capabilities is eliminating waste and avoiding
various difficulties, while the US has difficulty in saving natural resources which is
very abundant compared to Japan so that the term "in-time" does not apply. for
American management but more likely to be just in case.
TQM Mindset on Japanese Companies
a. Quality No.1
Quality is a top priority, without quality there are no buyers. Without
buyers the company will not profit. Without profit the company will go bankrupt,
so quality must be the main concern
b. Management cycle (PDCA, SDCA)
Plan-Do-Check-Action is used as a means of improving product quality.
By rotating the PDCA cycle, there will be lots of Kaizen that can be produced.
When quality has been achieved at a certain level, a standardization system is
carried out to prevent setbacks with the Standard-Do-Check-Action cycle.
c. Management based on facts.
219
Management must use facts or real data, not on the basis of mere
opinions or opinions.
d. Process management.
Quality is made in the process, there must be process management,
quality is not made by inspection, quality is made when the product is being
made. A good process will produce good goods and if a bad process will produce
bad items too.
e. Market in orientation.
Market-in considers quality at market demand. What the market wants
will be fulfilled, with a small number of products in a large number of product
variations.
f. Orientation on priority.
Recognizing that there are many major problems and problems that
focus on improvement. With priority oriented, all corrective actions will be more
useful and right on target.
g. Customer
Companies don't make customers disappointed, they don't want to
bother other people. By instilling the mindset that the next process is the
customer, then it will be very regretful if there are problems in the production
process. There are three main processes in production within the company,
namely the process before the process, the process during the process, the
process after the process is complete. With this stage, there will actually be many
double inspection processes between processes, so that quality can be
immediately known if there are problems.
h. Standardization
Standardization is used to prevent deterioration in the quality level.
Standardization is finally used as a new culture for company people so that
quality is truly maintained, even though the company used to cover themselves
up to more, the anxiety of the company's success will be copied by other
companies.
An important step in Total Quality Management Japan
1. Kaizen
Continuous Improvement Process. Companies always try to improve
the effectiveness, efficiency and productivity of their work. In accordance with the
meaning, the philosophy of Kaizen is to carry out continuous improvement or
220
be a color label, container box, etc.) that will give instructions, what documents /
items should be stored and which ones should be disposed of.
2. SEITON
(Meaning: Neatness / neatness; conversion in English: Set in Order
or Simplify)
After all documents and objects have been sorted (which ones
are stored and which are discarded), then it is time to move to the seiton stage.
Whether we realize it or not, we waste a lot of productive hours in the office to
find or reach various different items needed for work. To avoid this, Japanese
companies ensure the goods and documents in their offices must be arranged in
such a way, based on the importance / frequency of their use. They put items
that are often used in a place close to the workstation so that it is easily
accessible, and items that are rarely used are placed in a further storage area.
In addition to placing goods based on the frequency of their use,
Japanese companies also ensure that the preparation of goods and documents
must be carried out in such a way that they are easily removed / taken; no extra
effort is needed to move / issue other items that are not needed and then return
them again. They really ensure the efficiency of time and energy. The ideal
position of storage is a place that is still between the eyes and hips of humans;
not too high or low.
3. SEISO
(Meaning: Cleaning / Cleaning; conversion in English: Shine or
Sweep)
In Japan, people have the principle that it will be more difficult
to return something to prime condition after a long time has been neglected,
compared to maintaining the condition of the goods remain excellent. Keeping
everything in their best condition will extend the time spent on these items and
can even facilitate other work. Japanese companies do seiso; ensure every object
is in its best condition wherever possible. They do this by combining cleaning and
maintenance routines.
4. SEIKETSU
(Meaning: Standardization; conversion of English: Standardize)
Without a structure, maybe not a lot of the results that have
been obtained from every initiative that has been done will be able to survive.
They realized that without the structure and process, the positive results that had
225
been obtained would be eroded quickly, while a lot of confusion had occurred,
which would stall the 5S initiative. For this reason, they standardize and document
processes that will ensure the running of SEIRI, SEITON, and SEISO consistently
with the SOP.
5. SHITSUKE
(Meaning: Discipline; English language conversion: Self-discipline)
Starting positive initiatives can be an easy matter, but maintaining
consistency and results from these initiatives can be the most difficult aspect. To
achieve SHITSUKE, Japanese companies integrate 5S activities and structuring into
business processes to monitor compliance of each department and joint
organization of 5S.
Many Japanese companies use rewarding strategies, namely giving
awards to people who have played a role in the implementation of 5S as a daily
activity, in addition to doing their own activities and work. Organizations must find
ways to attract 5S integration to ensure the involvement of all stakeholders.
TQM Implementation in Companies in Indonesia
Critical Factors that Contribute to the Success of TQM in Indonesia Putri
and Yusof (2008) proposed important factors that contributed to the success of
quality engineering for the automotive industry in Malaysia and Indonesia, namely:
1. Management Responsibility
Strategic quality planning (clarity and orientation of vision / quality
policy), which means the solidarity of the senior management team that is
committed to providing customer satisfaction and communicating the vision in a
way that can mobilize all employees towards organizational goals. The initial
responsibility is to develop company quality policies, which integrate mission /
vision statements, strategic objectives and company policies.
2. Management of resources
Organizations must identify and provide all the resources needed to
achieve a quality plan. These resources, including personnel who are trained and
meet the qualifications, facilities, equipment, and work environment that meets
consumer needs. Putri and Yusof (2008) view resource management as one of the
important factors that will influence the successful implementation of quality
engineering (QE). This important factor is separated into three sub-factors, namely:
a. Resources related to technology and production (for example:
facilities and equipment);
226
of the data is presented in the form of bar charts, line graphs, and pareto
diagrams. Various kinds of quality tools and techniques are used in different
processes. For example, failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) and experimental
design are mainly used in design and development processes.
6. Supplier Management (Supplier)
Many researchers argue that companies must build a supply chain
partnership to motivate suppliers to provide the material needed to meet
customer expectations (Lau & Idris, 2001; Thiagarajan, et al. 2000) in Putri & Yusof
(2008). Moreover, having an effective supply chain management can contribute to
quality performance in many ways. Online supplier evaluation can help
organizations share information and improve mutual understanding. Long-term
partnerships / relationships with suppliers also help the parties involved to solve
problems with suppliers and also help the parties involved to solve quality
problems and invest in quality improvement efforts. Supplier partnerships are a
way to develop relationships with suppliers to ensure that they understand the
customer's specific needs and requirements. Motwani (2001) argues that supplier /
vendor partnerships should be based on quality programs and acceptable
progress documentation on continuous improvement in quality.
7. Focus on Customers
This factor looks at information that can be useful for increasing
customer satisfaction and how it performs compared to similar organizations. This
information can be used for further improvement to build an understanding of the
environment in which the company operates (Lau and Idris, 2001) in Putri & Yusof
(2008). Motwani (2001) argues that customer service should serve two main areas:
internal customer service and external customer assurance. The components of
the internal customer service plan include providing timely and reliable work
completion, presenting improvements or cost savings suggestions for management
and giving employees the authority to implement their own solutions, cross-
training employees for mastering jobs, and providing technical adequate training.
Factors Inhibiting the Effectiveness of TQM Implementation in
Indonesia
Amar & Zain (2001) conducted research on 364 selected manufacturing
companies from the Indonesian Manufacturing Industry Directory (BPS, 1999),
which according to its classification consisted of food, beverages and cigarettes;
textiles, clothing & leather; wood & wood products; paper, printing, and publishing;
228
Conclusion
Japan is one of the developed countries in Asia with no death and
characteristic of Japan's nationalism itself, even though Japanese people make
229
companies and run businesses and economies in other countries, but the values
of Japanese nationalism remain firm and remain in all the field they do. In terms
of the implementation of the economy and business, Japanese people put more
emphasis on human resources in companies and organizations they form and run.
Total Quality Management that binds to Japanese companies is inseparable from
Kaizen culture, so that Japan applies the principles of Customer Satisfaction,
Quality Function Development (QFD), Employee Empowerment, Continuous
Improvement in its company.
Product development carried out by Japanese companies is to meet
market segments with international standards and on the quality side of the
product. Failure to do so can result in large fines and poor press images that will
damage the company's reputation. Continuous improvement in various fields,
respect and teamwork is the key to the success of Total Quality Management in
Japanese companies. Japanese companies are identified as having long-term time
horizons.
Recommendation
Companies in Indonesia can learn from success stories and best practices
found in Japanese companies and companies in other countries that have
successfully adopted TQM. In addition, after knowing the important factors that
can support success and failure in the effectiveness of TQM implementation, it
will be useful if companies in Indonesia can maximize these supporting factors.
Conversely, continuous improvement must always be carried out to minimize the
obstacles that occur.
Refferences
Amar, Kiyafah & Zuraidah Mohd Zain. (2001). “Barriers in the Implementation of
Total Quality Management in Indonesian Manufacturing Organizations”.
Jurnal Teknik Industri, Vol. 3, No. 2, December 2001: 72-79.
Banker, R., G. Potter, dan R. Schroeder. (1993). “Exporting Manufacturing
Performance Measures To Worker: An Empirical Study”. Journal of
Management Accounting Research. 33-35.
Cane. (1998). Establishing Kaizen Culture. Circuit Assemble, November.
Daniel, S., dan W. Reitsperger. (1991). “Linking Quality Strategy With Management
Control Systems: Empirical Evidence From Japanese Industry”.
230
Dowling, Peter J, Marion Festing and Allen D. Engle. (2008). International Human
Resource Management : Managing People in a Multinational Context.
(5th ed). South- Western Cengage Learning, United Kingdom
Gaspersz, Vincent. (1998). Manajemen Produktivitas Total. Jakarta.Gramedia
Pustaka Utama.
Gaspersz, Vincent. (2001). Total Quality Management. Jakarta : Gramedia Pustaka
Utama.
Handayani, (2005). Kaizen Culture, Education and Training. New York : Irwing
Professional.
Hansen, Don R. and Mowen Maryanne M. (2000). Management Accounting.
Cincinnati Ohio : South-Western College Publishing.
Hari Purnomo, Pengantar Teknik Industri, Graha Ilmu. (2004). Yogyakarta.
Hitoshi Takeda. (2006). The Change Management Handbook. New York: Irwing
Professional
Horngren, Charles T., George Foster., Srikant M. Datar. (2000). Cost Accounting: A
Managerial Emphasis. International Edition.
Jurnal Akuntansi. (2012, November). “Pengaruh Penerapan Total Quality
Management (TQM) dan Komitmen Organisasi terhadap Kinerja Perusahaan
dengan Budaya Organisasi Sebagai Variabel Moderasi” Survei Pada
Perusahaan Manufaktur di Jawa Barat yang Listing di BEI. Vol.4 No.2 :
pp.175-186
Jurnal Akuntansi. (2013, April). “Pengaruh Total Quality Management Terhadap
Kinerja Financial”. Study Pada Perusahaan Jasa di Kota Pekanbaru
Provinsi Riau. Vol. 1 (No. 2) : pp.213-226.
Krajewski, J. Lee and P. R. Larry. (2006). Operations Management Strategy and
Analysis. Fifth Edition, Addison-Wesley Publising Company Inc.
Kujala, J., & Lillrank, P. (2004). “Total quality management as a cultural
phenomenon”. Quality Management Journal, 11(4), 43-55.
Lincoln, J. R. (1989). “Employee work attitudes and management practice in the
US and Japan”. California Management Review(Fall), 89-106.
231
Locke,E., dan G. Latham. (1990). Goal Setting Theory and Task performance.
New York: Prentice Hall.
Masaaki Imai. (1998). Genba Kaizen : Pendekatan Akal Sehat, Berbiaya Rendah
Pada Manajemen. Jakarta, Pustaka Brinaman Pressindo.
Majalah Ekonomi Tahun XVII. (2007). Total Quality Management, Sistem
Pengukuran Kinerja. Sistem Penghargaan Dan Kinerja Manajerial.
Martin Fackler. (2010). “In Toyota Mess, Lesson for Japan”. The New York Times.
Site on February 2018. Available from :
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/09/business/global/09toyota.html
Masaaki Imai. (1991). Kaizen : The Key to Japan's Competitive Success.
Singapore, McGraw-Hill International.
Masaaki Imai. (1998). Genba Kaizen: Pendekatan Akal Sehat, Berbiaya Rendah
Pada Manajemen. Jakarta : Pustaka Brinaman Pressindo.
Motwani, Jaideep (2001). “Critical Factors and Performance Measures of TQM”.
The TQM Magazine, 13(4), 292–300.
Nilda Tri Putri & Sha'ri Mohd Yusof. (2008). “Critical Success Factors for
Implementing Quality Engineering (QE) In Malaysian's and Indonesian's
Automotive Industries: A Proposed Model. 2008”, Korea Automotive
Research Institute. IJAIM, Vol. 2 (December 2008), 1-15
Noguchi, J. (1995). “The legacy of W. Edwards Deming”. Quality Progress. 28(12),
35-37.
Prajogo D.I., A.S. Sohal (2000). “TQM and innovation: A literature review and
research framework”. Technovation hal. pp. 539–558.
Poropat, Arthur & John Keller. (n.d). Buddhism and TQM: An Alternative
Explanation of Japan’s Adoption of Total Quality Management.
Department of Management, Griffith Business School, Griffith University,
Australia.
Prajogo, Daniel. I., and Brown, A. (2004). “The Relationship Between TQM Practice
and Quality Performance and the Role of Formal TQM Programs: An
Australian Empirical Study”. Quality Management Journal. 11 (4), pp.31-
42.
Reader, I., Andreasen, E., & Stafansson, F. (1993). Japanese religions: Past and
present. Honolulu : University of Hawaii Press.
Sila, I. (2007). “Examining the effects of contextual faktors on TQM and
performance through the lens of organizational theory: an empirical study,
232