Professional Documents
Culture Documents
POWERED BY
DEVELOPMENTS IN
ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
FEBRUARY 2021
2 C E C R E D I T S
ESTHETIC REHABILITATION
C A S E S T U D Y
FUNCTIONAL ESTHETICS
Correction of Dysfunctional
Wear Results in Esthetic
Outcome for Reluctant Patient
Jacek Glebocki, DMD
SUPPORTED BY AN UNRESTRICTED GRANT FROM AACD • Published by AEGIS Publications, LLC © 2021
Form with
Function
of Continuing Education in Dentistry
R
FEBRUARY 2021 | www.compendiumlive.com
PUBLISHER
Matthew T. Ingram
of Continuing Education in Dentistry
SPECIAL PROJECTS DIRECTOR
ehabilitation does not guarantee esthetic C. Justin Romano
results. Nonetheless, the challenges of ad- SPECIAL PROJECTS COORDINATOR
June Portnoy
dressing both within the same case often of Continuing Education in Dentistry
MANAGING EDITOR
inspire creative thinking by the restorative Bill Noone
these two approaches, they could create anterior interocclusal Printed in the U.S.A.
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
• Analyze the risk factors • Discuss the role of the Dahl • Assess the various options
involved in a case of severe technique and its modification available in adhesive dentistry
palatal erosion in managing maxillary anterior for managing cases of
teeth with severe palatal severe palatal erosion with
erosion and without posterior tooth
D
structure loss
the chemical, biochemical, or electrochemical has several disadvantages. First, such prepa-
action that causes the molecular degradation rations sacrifice a significant amount of in-
of the essential properties in a living tissue.1,2 tact tooth structure in teeth that are already
Adhesive technology has progressed consid- eroded and have lost the critical tooth sub-
erably in recent decades and has shown that, stance needed for sufficient retention and
along with excellent esthetics, it can also be resistance and have become short, thin, and
used to reestablish crown stiffness while al- flat. The clinician may be required to use even
lowing maximum preservation of the residual more invasive procedures such as intraradic-
hard-tissue structure in both anterior and pos- ular posts, thereby compromising pulp vital-
terior teeth. Adhesive technology offers two ity and rendering the teeth nonvital. Second,
primary benefits3-5: (1) adhesive ceramic res- this approach can lead to a higher rate of sec-
torations can be used via an additive approach, ondary caries, due to the restorative margins
ie, they do not require a significant amount being on dentin that is exposed due to enamel
of tooth reduction because the existing space erosion. Third, these preparations are poten-
provided by the missing tissues is utilized; tially clinically less satisfactory than veneers
and (2) conventional “resistance and reten- because of the stiff metal-ceramic coping,
tion form” principles can be omitted; instead which renders the underlying flexible tooth
the bonds between the porcelain and luting structure prone to fracture. Finally, there is
resin composite and between the luting resin the issue of gingival inflammation around
composite and tooth are exploited. full-coverage restorations with intracrevic-
ular margins. Adhesive restoration margins
Localized Palatal Wear/Erosion and finish lines that can generally be left
and Restorative Challenges equigingival or supragingival are less likely
The palatal surfaces of anterior teeth present to generate gingival inflammation compared
clinicians a threefold challenge in achieving to traditional full-crown coverage.
optimal surface preparation and restoration6: Hence, clinicians should mimimize the
(1) they offer limited stability and retention due use of approaches that involve more invasive
to their concave geometry; (2) tensile stresses palatal reduction and consider other treat-
tend to concentrate on the concave surface; ment modalities.
and (3) limited space is available with regard
to their antagonistic dentition. 2. Orthodontic repositioning: Though a conser-
The authors suggest two treatment possi- vative option that can sometimes be ideal,
bilities for managing cases on anterior palatal time constraints and economic consider-
erosion. ations may negate the use of orthodontic
repositioning in many cases.
Restorative Options
Three restorative options can be considered7-10: 3. Enameloplasty: With the patient’s consent,
performing enameloplasty on opposing teeth
1. Full-coverage crown preparations: The task can provide additional space, but it may lead
of optimal preparation and restoration be- to hypersensitivity.
comes even more daunting in cases of deep
overbite and combined facial/palatal erosion, Occlusal Principles
and, in such instances, clinicians may be in- In an effort to develop a simple, highly conser-
clined to attempt traditional full-coverage vative approach to localized anterior erosion
crown preparations. However, this approach and wear, various authors have described two
occlusal principles: centric relation (CR) and and the anterior teeth experience intrusion.
the Dahl principle. A combined approach ac- This combination approach reestablishes
counts for a third principle. the posterior occlusion while maintaining
anterior space. Now, with the availability of
1. Centric relation: Lucia11 first proposed the adhesive dentistry, direct resin composites
use of an acrylic jig for CR recording. The can be used as provisional restorations and
same technique was later refined to retain achieve the same objectives.
the space needed to allow for the placement
of restorations. Cardoso et al12 proposed 3. Combined clinical approach10: In severe
the use of a modified Lucia jig—an anterior generalized TSL, due to erosion involving
deprogrammer to reposition the mandible in anterior and posterior teeth, it may be pru-
CR to first create some space, and then use dent to restore the lost vertical dimension by
that space to enable direct composite res- opening the bite through the restoration of
torations. Because of the resilience of resin posterior teeth (ie, additive approach). This,
material and their ease of manipulation even combined with harmonizing the maximum
in limited thicknesses, direct composites can intercuspation (MIP) with CR, provides the
be employed as anterior deprogrammers crucial few millimeters needed to restore lost
themselves, and, for the same reasons, can form without aggressive tooth preparation.
be regarded as an ideal material for palatal
surface restorations. A greater challenge, however, presents in
cases of localized TSL on the palatal surfaces
2. Dahl principle13-16: Dahl proposed the use of the upper anterior teeth with little or no
of an anterior bite plane in the treatment TSL on the posterior teeth. The use of palatal
of localized anterior tooth wear. With this veneers utilizing a modified Dahl principle is
approach, a cast-metal appliance is used for a conservative option and is advocated in such
approximately 4 to 6 months to create space cases whenever possible. Documented cases
by separating the posterior teeth. Posterior of successful management of these situations17
teeth are allowed to undergo passive eruption, have employed a simple, additive approach
TABLE 1
Anterior Clinical Erosive (ACE) Classification and Management Guidelines for Damaged
Maxillary Anterior Teeth18
Fig 1. Fig 2.
Fig 3. Fig 4.
Fig 5. Fig 6.
Fig 1. Preoperative frontal smile view. Fig 2. Preoperative frontal retracted 1:2 view. Fig 3. Preoperative view
showing erosion of palatal surfaces of upper anteriors. Fig 4. Centric wax record with Lucia jig. Fig 5. Wax-
up for restoration of palatal erosion. Fig 6. Palatal surfaces etched and ready to receive composite resin.
using direct resin for management of local- A 40-year-old female patient complained of
ized palatal wear along with a modified Dahl short teeth and asked for various options to
principle, which allows patients to retain their improve her smile. On clinical examination,
residual anterior tooth structure. the palatal surfaces of the maxillary anterior
A classification for damaged maxillary an- teeth were found to be eroded, with the residual
terior teeth and guidelines for their clinical tooth structure having a smooth and shiny ap-
management has been published18 (Table 1). pearance (Figure 1 through Figure 3). In MIP,
The following case report discusses a compre- no restorative space was available, as the lower
hensive and holistic approach to restoration of anterior teeth fit tightly into the upper palatal
maxillary anterior teeth with palatal erosion. surfaces, making this a clinically challenging
situation to treat conservatively. In most cas-
Case Analysis and Treatment es of conventional treatment protocols, such
Sequence upper teeth are devitalized and restored with
A combined approach of the clinical application of crowns that structurally leave the teeth in a
CR and the Dahl principle is described as follows: compromised condition.10
A difference between MIP and CR was iden- with palatal composite resin veneers (Figure 6
tified through a gentle maneuver using a Lucia and Figure 7). The principles used here dem-
jig that guided the mandible into CR (Figure onstrate the Dahl technique that was modified
4). The upper cast was then mounted on a from its original version to suit the esthetic
semi-adjustable articulator with a facebow requirements of the patient and to make use
record and the lower cast with a centric record. of adhesive techniques with contemporary
Articulator mounting showed that when the restorative resins.
condyles were in CR, the teeth did not occlude The open contacts and interocclusal space
in MIP. On opening the centric lock on the created between the posterior teeth (Figure
articulator and allowing the teeth to touch in 8) resulted in supraeruption of the posteriors
MIP, the authors found a lack of space avail- in approximately 4 months’ time. After supra-
able to restore the palatal surfaces of the max- eruption was complete, occlusal equilibration
illary anteriors. Thus, a decision was made to was performed to harmonize the occlusion
keep the condylar rods in CR on the articu- and attain bilaterally uniform and simulta-
lator, which would create some space in the neous contacts between all posterior teeth. A
anterior zone to restore the palatal surfaces labial esthetic wax-up was then fabricated for
of the maxillary anteriors. the upper anterior teeth to produce an esthetic
This space, acquired by recording the CR enhancement in the smile.
correctly, was utilized to prepare the pala- A provisional was fabricated intraorally us-
tal surface wax-up (Figure 5). This, in turn, ing a matrix fabricated on the wax-up (Figure
opened up the posterior contacts by 1 mm. 9). Once the patient approved the proposed
This new maxilla-mandibular relation was changes in the anterior tooth form, minimalis-
created intraorally and stabilized by restoring tic tooth preparations for monolithic lithium-
the palatal surfaces of the maxillary anteriors disilicate veneers were performed (Figure 10),
Fig 7. Resin build-up accomplished for palatal surfaces to restore lost form. Fig 8. Posterior teeth out of oc-
clusion due to palatal build-up. Fig 9. Smile view with provisional facial veneers. Fig 10. Final minimal facial
preparations with tissue management. Fig 11. Postoperative frontal smile view. Fig 12. Postoperative view
showing posterior teeth in MIP.
Fig
Fig13.
13. Postoperative frontal retracted 1:2 view. Fig 14. Postoperative
Fig 14. view showing additively restored pala-
tal surfaces of upper anteriors.
bearing in mind the need to keep within the form of coverage (full or partial).1-9 With the
facial enamel. development of adhesive technology, an ad-
Monolithic lithium-disilicate pressed ve- ditive approach was introduced that utilizes
neers were fabricated for the maxillary six the existing space provided by missing tissues,
most anterior teeth. Staining was done to preserves the residual tooth structure, and ex-
achieve polychromy and subtle incisal trans- ploits the bond strength of luting resin com-
lucency. While layering the incisal character- posite that bonds the porcelain to the existing
istics will produce a superior esthetic result, in tooth structure.3-5
this case it would have required reducing the The unique challenges that palatal surfaces
incisal edges to create room for the ceramic. of anterior teeth typically present—ie, con-
To prevent loss of precious tooth structure in cave geometry, limited stability and retention,
a patient with minimal esthetic needs, the au- tensile stress concentration, limited space for
thors opted for an acceptable esthetic result of the opposing dentition—become even more
a stained veneer and, thereby, made a biologi- daunting in cases of deep overbite and com-
cally sound restoration completely in enamel. bined facial/palatal erosion.6 Conventional
A few weeks later, the facial veneers were full-coverage crown preparations in such
bonded directly to the underlying enamel. A cases result in further sacrifice of significant
postoperative photograph (Figure 11) revealed amounts of tooth structure in already dam-
the restored harmony of the patient’s smile aged teeth and present other risks such as ren-
and the occlusal contacts in MIP (Figure 12). dering the teeth nonvital and a higher rate for
The palatal surfaces restored with nanofilled secondary caries.7-10
composite resin developed good anterior As described earlier, two occlusal prin-
guidance that was harmonized to the patient’s ciples—centric relation (CR) and the Dahl
chewing cycle (Figure 13 and Figure 14).19 principle—were developed as simple, highly
conservative approaches to localized ante-
Discussion rior erosion and wear. With CR, an anterior
Prior to the emergence of adhesive technol- deprogrammer is used11,12 to reposition the
ogy, the clinical management of tooth erosion mandible in CR to create space that en-
or biocorrosion1,2 focused primarily on bio- ables the room for direct composite resto-
mechanical aspects alone, whereby the top rations. Resilient and easy to manipulate,
priority was to achieve tooth reinforcement direct composites can be used as anterior
by extracoronal strengthening through some deprogrammers themselves and for palatal
surface restorations. The Dahl principle13-16 of maxillary anteriors with palatal composite
employs the use of an anterior bite plane resin veneers. The interocclusal space gener-
in the treatment of localized anterior tooth ated between the posteriors resulted in pos-
wear, whereby a cast-metal appliance is used terior supraeruption, which generated a new
to create space by separating the posterior occlusion that was harmonized by occlusal
teeth, which are then able to undergo passive equilibration. Monolithic lithium-disilicate
eruption while the anterior teeth experience veneers were placed on the maxillary anteri-
intrusion. This reestablishes posterior occlu- ors to enhance the final smile.
sion while maintaining anterior space. Composite restoration wear was once a
Adhesive dentistry can be used to achieve the significant worry; that concern, though, has
same objectives, employing direct resin com- substantially subsided in recent years due
posites as provisional restorations through an to improved technology, which has led to
additive approach. In cases of severe gener- enhanced formulations and significantly
alized TSL caused by erosion involving both better products.10 For patients with no para-
anterior and posterior teeth, restoring the functional habits, posterior composite resin
lost vertical dimension by opening the bite wear is now considered a resolvable problem.
through the restoration of posterior teeth (ie, Individuals with parafunctional habits, how-
additive approach) may be optimal. Combined ever, warrant careful monitoring and supple-
with harmonizing the MIP with CR, this strat- mental protection with nightguards to reduce
egy allows lost form to be restored without wear-related failures.10 In addition, palatal
aggressive tooth preparation.10 surface composites may wear off in the me-
However, the greatest challenge presents dium to long term.10However, even cases of
in cases of localized TSL on the palatal sur- significant palatal restoration wear can be
faces of only the upper anteriors, with little, easily managed using a conservative repair
if any, TSL on posteriors. The option of pala- of the resin composite.
tal veneers using a modified Dahl principle is
conservative and encouraged in such cases Conclusion
whenever possible.10,17 When warranted, use of noninvasive addi-
This article presented a comparable case in tive approaches should be considered before
which the Dahl technique was modified to suit opting for traditional full-crown coverage. In
the esthetic requirements of the patient. First, eroded maxillary anterior teeth with limited
a new maxilla-mandibular relation was cre- palatal clearance (ie, deep bite), clinicians
ated intraorally, which was stabilized in the should first create adequate restorative space
second step by restoring the palatal surfaces through a combined use of CR and the Dahl
1. More recently, the term erosion has been 6. Who proposed the use of an anterior bite
replaced by: plane in the treatment of localized anterior
A. abfraction. tooth wear?
B. corrosion. A. Cardoso
C. biocorrosion. B. Lucia
D. surface erosion. C. Dahl
D. Myers
2. The palatal surfaces of anterior teeth present
limited stability and retention due to their: 7. With the Dahl technique, a cast-metal
A. convex geometry. appliance is used for approximately how long
B. concave geometry. to create space by separating the posterior
C. flat geometry. teeth?
D. variable geometry. A. 1 to 2 months
B. 3 to 4 months
3. Though a conservative restorative option that C. 4 to 6 months
can sometimes be ideal, time constraints and D. 6 to 9 months
economic considerations may negate the use
8. The combination approach by Dahl principle
of:
re-establishes the posterior occlusion while:
A. enameloplasty.
A. maintaining anterior space.
B. conventional restorations.
B. reducing anterior space.
C. adhesive technology.
C. increasing anterior space.
D. orthodontic repositioning.
D. None of the above
4. Performing which of the following 9. In the case presented, monolithic lithium
restorative options on opposing teeth can disilicate pressed veneers were fabricated for
provide additional space but may lead to the:
hypersensitivity? A. maxillary central incisors.
A. enameloplasty B. maxillary central and lateral incisors.
B. conventional restorations C. maxillary 6 anterior teeth.
C. adhesive technology D. full maxillary arch.
D. orthodontic repositioning
10. With CR, an anterior deprogrammer is used
5. Who first proposed the use of an acrylic jig to reposition the mandible in centric relation
for centric relation (CR) recording? to create space that enables the room for:
A. Cardoso A. a cast-metal appliance.
B. Lucia B. an anterior bite plane.
C. Dahl C. orthodontic braces.
D. Myers D. direct composite restorations.
Course is valid from 6/30/20 to 6/30/23. Participants must at- AEGIS Publications, LLC, is designated as
an Approved PACE Program Provider by the
tain a score of 70% on each quiz to receive credit. Participants
Academy of General Dentistry. The formal
receiving a failing grade on any exam will be notified and per- AEGIS Publications, LLC, is an ADA CERP Recognized
continuing education programs of this program
Provider. ADA CERP is a service of the American Dental
mitted to take one re-examination. Participants will receive an Association to assist dental professionals in identifying
provider are accepted by the AGD for Fellow-
quality providers of continuing dental education. ADA ship/Mastership and membership maintenance
annual report documenting their accumulated credits, and are CERP does not approve or endorse individual courses or credit. Approval does not imply acceptance by
urged to contact their own state registry boards for special CE instructors, nor does it imply acceptance of credit hours a state or provincial board of dentistry or AGD
by boards of dentistry. Concerns or complaints about a CE endorsement. The current term of approval
requirements. provider may be directed to the provider or to ADA CERP at extends from 1/1/17 to 12/31/22.
www.ada.org/cerp. Provider ID# 209722.
Correction of Dysfunctional
Wear Results in Esthetic
Outcome for Reluctant Patient
Jacek Glebocki, DMD
ABSTRACT: Patients sometimes present with functional problems but may not be mo-
tivated to improve esthetics. By gaining an understanding of the patient’s individual risk
factors, clinicians can design treatment so that risk to the entire dentition is decreased
while esthetics are improved. This case involved a patient concerned about wear on his
upper front teeth and who was interested in the most predictable and efficient treatment
possible. After a thorough diagnosis, risk assessment, and prognosis were carried out, an
esthetic mock-up was used to play a key role in engaging the patient in both the cosmetic
and functional benefits of the proposed treatment. The treatment required alleviation of
a constricted chewing pattern and utilized an occlusal splint to protect against potential
parafunctional clenching. Vertical dimension of occlusion was increased using minimally
invasive methods. Incisal length was addressed additively, and esthetic crown lengthening
was used to mitigate excessive tissue display.
In the present case, a male patient was concerned about extensive wear on his upper ante-
rior teeth, but had no interest in addressing issues dealing with esthetics. It was important
for the clinician to engage the patient in the treatment, because to be effective the treatment
would change the appearance of his smile. There was a need to improve function and achieve
precise, simultaneous, bilateral contacts on the patient’s posterior teeth and minimize chew-
ing friction on the anterior teeth. The use of an esthetic mock-up and a Kois deprogrammer
would prove pivotal to increasing the patient’s understanding of the situation.
Fig 2.
Fig 1.
previous dental interventions. There was one restoration was found on tooth No. 30 (Figure
interproximal carious lesion restored within 4). Also detected were minimal signs of abra-
the previous 3 years, and the patient also re- sion combined with erosion facially on teeth
ported the shortening of his upper teeth and Nos. 19 through 22 and 27 through 30 and
that the lingual sides of the same teeth were minimal to moderate erosion combined with
“feeling thin.” abrasion on occlusal surfaces of teeth Nos. 5,
Notably, he described the inability to get his 14, 18 through 20, and 29 through 31. Attrition
posterior teeth to touch except by clenching on anterior teeth Nos. 8 and 9, however, was
his teeth and moving his jaw back excessive- found to be severe.
ly. After discussing this issue with the clini- Risk: Moderate overall; high on severely
cian, the patient revealed that he would often worn teeth Nos. 8 and 9
squeeze and clench his teeth while working Prognosis: Fair to poor
out regularly at the gym. Functional: The patient’s maximum opening
was within normal range (44 mm) with no de-
Diagnosis, Risk Assessment, and viation upon opening. No joint sounds were
Prognosis detected and joint loading testing was negative.
Periodontal: Probing depths were less than 3 Mandibular immobilization testing caused dis-
mm, and no areas of bleeding on probing were comfort for the patient. Severe attrition was
found. Bone support was within 1 mm to 2 mm noted on lingual and incisal surfaces of teeth
of the cementoenamel junctions, and there Nos. 8 and 9, and low to moderate attrition
were no infrabony defects. No recession was was seen on teeth Nos. 6, 7, 10, and 11 (Figure
found. 5). The lower incisors had moderate attrition.
Risk: Low Primary occlusal traumatism with fremitus
Prognosis: Good was found on teeth Nos. 8 through 10.
Biomechanical: As noted above, the pa- By combining the functional diagnostic
tient had one interproximal carious lesion findings with the patient’s dental history,
within the previous 3 years. A questionable which had established that the patient has to
Fig 4. Fig 5.
Fig 6. Fig 7.
Fig 4. Lower arch, initial situation. Note questionable restoration on tooth No. 30. Fig 5. Upper arch, initial
situation. Fig 6. Therapeutic jaw joint position. Fig 7. Diagnostic wax-up.
squeeze his posterior teeth to gain contact and restorative treatment would be fully displayed,
has to pull his jaw back as well, a diagnosis the risk for esthetic treatment was greatly
of a constricted chewing pattern was made. increased.
Parafunction also was considered a contribu- Risk: High
tory factor given the patient’s admission of Prognosis: Fair to poor, especially consider-
clenching during workouts. The risk for a ing the patient’s initial reluctance to allow any
constricted chewing pattern typically would visible changes to be made to his smile
be considered moderate; however, with the
patient’s daytime parafunction and the severe, Treatment Goals
active attrition on teeth Nos. 8 and 9, the risk The first treatment goal was to engage the
was considered higher. patient in the need to improve function and
Risk: Moderate to high achieve precise, simultaneous, bilateral con-
Prognosis: Poor tacts on his posterior teeth and minimize
Dentofacial: During the Duchenne smile, the chewing friction on the anterior teeth. The
patient revealed high lip dynamics and full dis- patient would need to be fully engaged in the
play of maxillary tooth height, and gingiva and outcome because any effective treatment
asymmetrical gingival contours showed as far would change the appearance of his smile. The
back as the patient’s molars (Figure 1). During use of an esthetic mock-up and a Kois depro-
lip repose the maxillary teeth were completely grammer would prove pivotal to the patient’s
hidden from view and the canine was above the understanding.
lip approximately 2 mm (Figure 2). All maxil- The next goal was to maintain the patient’s
lary teeth were angled toward the palate and ongoing overall health with sound preventive
some small spaces existed between anterior measures. Functional risk would be managed
teeth in both arches. Because all aspects of any by relieving the constricted chewing pattern
Fig 8. Fig 9.
Fig 8. Mock-up for functional and esthetic evaluation. Fig 9. Gingivotomy, first cut with guides in place.
Fig 10. Osteo-gingivoplasty done after flap was raised. Fig 11. Patient’s smile, 3 months after osteo-gingivo-
plasty procedure. Fig 12. Platform between teeth Nos. 8 and 9, in maximum intercuspation on all back teeth.
Fig 13. Bite registration.
Fig 19.
restore length to the worn anterior teeth. The varnish was suggested at recare appointments.
patient was interested in the most predictable To execute this plan predictably a repeat-
and efficient treatment possible. able jaw joint reference position had to be es-
tablished and recorded. Use of a Kois depro-
Phase 1: Education and Initiation of grammer was initiated for this purpose.1
Kois Deprogrammer
The patient was educated about the causes of Phase 2: Diagnostic Wax-up
tooth decay, abrasion, and the importance of The patient wore the Kois deprogrammer for 2
rebalancing the pH of the mouth. To help ad- weeks and noticed that every time he removed
dress this issue, products were recommended the device, his anterior teeth were in contact.
for the patient to use (CTx4 Gel and Cari Free At that time, an interocclusal record was taken
CTx3 Rinse, CariFree, carifree.com). Dietary using bite registration materials (LuxaBite and
changes were recommended as well, including O-Bite, DMG America, dmg-america.com) with
avoidance of acidic beverages, and fluoride the deprogrammer in the mouth to record the
using bisphenol A glycidyl methacrylate (BIS- due to the constricted chewing pattern that
GMA) resin (ProTemp™, 3M ESPE, 3m.com) was contributing to ongoing tooth structure
and cemented with temporary dental cement loss. The protective splint, however, was still
(Temp-Bond™, Kerr, kerrdental.com). recommended to safeguard the restorations
E.max® (Ivoclar Vivadent, ivoclarvivadent.com) following any episodes of parafunction dur-
ceramic restorations were used for occlusal-facial ing gym exercises. The patient remains on
overlays on 12 posterior teeth veneers, lower an- 4-month recare interval for maintenance.
terior teeth, and full-coverage crowns on upper The only anticipated liability is the resto-
anterior teeth. The four second molars were to rations, ie, chipped porcelain, and not the
be restored with direct composite. remaining teeth. The patient’s periodontal
prognosis remains excellent. Biomechanical,
Phase 6: Final Restorations functional, and dentofacial prognoses were
Provisional crowns were removed and the elevated to good.
final restorations were successfully tried in.
Adhesive protocols were used for all veneers ACKNOWLEDGMENT
and overlays using luting composite (Variolink®, Laboratory support and ceramics were pro-
Ivoclar Vivadent), and the crowns were cement- vided by Katarzyna and Miroslaw Kapusta,
ed using a cohesive protocol (RelyX™ Unicem, Kapdent, Krakow, Poland.
3M ESPE). The second molars received direct
composite to create acceptable occlusal con- ABOUT THE AUTHOR
tacts. Occlusion was checked and after minor Jacek Glebocki, DMD
Mentor, Kois Center, Seattle, Washington; Private Practice,
adjustments an impression was taken for a Novadent, Lomza, Poland
maxillary occlusal splint.
The final result far exceeded the patient’s Queries to the author regarding this course may be submit-
expectations (Figure 14 through Figure 19). ted to authorqueries@aegiscomm.com.
Conclusion REFERENCES
Gaining an understanding of the patient’s 1. Jayne DJ. A deprogrammer for occlusal analysis
and simplified accurate case mounting. J Cosmetic
individual risk factors allows treatment to be Dentistry. 2006;21(4):96-102.
designed such that risk to the entire denti- 2. Misch CE. Guidelines for maxillary incisal edge po-
tion may be decreased. In this case, almost sition - a pilot study: the key is the canine. J Prostho-
all of the necessary tooth preparations were dont. 2008;17(2):130-134.
3. Arnett GW, Gunson MJ. Facial analysis: the key to
kept in enamel, which further minimized successful dental treatment planning. J Cosmetic
additional biomechanical risk. The occlu- Dentistry. 2005;21(3):20-34.
sal management and increased VDO elimi- 4. Kois JC. The restorative-periodontal interface: bio-
nated the concerns associated with friction logical parameters. Periodontol 2000. 1996;11:29-38.