BIJIT - BVICAM’s International Journal of Information Technology
Bharati Vidyapeeth’s Institute of Computer Applications and Management (BVICAM), New Delhi
A New Parametric Generalized Exponential Entropy measure on
Intuitionistic Vague Sets
Abstract - Entropy is a significant mathematical instrument for
determining ambiguous / fuzzy information. Entropy is
indispensable for measuring ambiguity, first familiarized by
Shannon (1948) to extent the degree of uncertainty in likelihood
distributions. Complex info processes are extensively pragmatic
in decision-making processes. Created as per the notion of an
exponential exponent for the fuzzy set, our exertion offers a
measure of the power of an intuitive set of exponents. This
article identifies a new measure of the exponential theorem on
an intuitive set of equations. In addition, the necessary
properties are displayed. By analyzing the results of the
examples, it has been shown that this method is faster and more
effective in practice.
Index Terms - Ambiguous entropy, intuitionistic vague
entropy, exponential intuitionistic uncertain entropy.
1. INTRODUCTION
Shannon (1948) idea is so successful in learning the basic limits
of communication in the classical way that the sender wants to
transmit a message to a recipient on an unreliable medium.
manuscript “The Mathematics of Communication” re-iterated
Shannon’s effort for wider technical addressees. That signifies the
foundation of the professed “Information Theory”. Shannon
entropy is defined as follows:
H(P) = − ∑𝑛𝑖=1 𝑝𝑖 𝑙𝑜𝑔𝑝𝑖 (1)
for any probability distribution P = (𝑝1 , 𝑝2 , 𝑝3 , … … . 𝑝𝑛 )
Various generalizations of Shannon entropy were studied by
Renyi (1961), Arimoto (1971), Sharma and Taneja (1975),
Peerzada et al. (2017), Deluca and Termini (1972), Kaufmann
(1980). Vagueness and ambiguity are the elementary nature of
social miracles and goals in the physical sphere. The distinction
lies in our judgements in our verbal and the means we practice
information. Zadeh (1965) presented a rule of fuzzy data known
as fuzzy entropy which is as per the input energy of Shannon. In
concept, a set of nonmembership values complement one of its
membership values, but in practice this is not correct; i.e., resolved
in advanced order, as defined by Atanasov (1986) are called
intuitionistic fuzzy sets (IFS). IFS has the advantage of addressing
inaccuracies, as well as the unwillingness to have inadequate
sources of information. There are two membership functions
µA(x) and non-member νA(x) for x element. Subsequently, Burillo
and Bustince (1996) determine the measure of distance between
IFSs. It also gives a manifest description of intuitive entropy along
its characteristics. Later, Szmidt and Kacprz’yk (2001, 2005)
extend the fuzzy possessions and emphasize distances intended.
Hung and Yang (2006), Chaira and Ray (2008), Vlachos and
Sergiadis (2007), Verma and Sharma (2013) and Ye (2010)
Copy Right © BIJIT –
developed the IFS entropies and discriminatory measures among
IFS with equivalent possessions and demonstrate effectiveness in
medicinal diagnostics, design recognition, edge recognition,
imaging and multidisciplinary judgement making. Gupta et al.
(2014) proposed a fuzzy extent projected on the basis of vague sets
provided by Pal and Pal (1989) with some properties.
Lamba and Kumar (2016) developed an algorithm which works
well in large data sets as data mining has turned to be a milestone
in information industry. Deshpande et al. (2014) discussed the
utility of Zadeh approach for fuzzy description of air and water
quality. Chaudhary et al. (2014) emphasized on proposed fuzzy
based intrusion detection systems in mobile ad hoc networks and
presented their effectiveness to identify the intrusions. Various
authors like Verma and Sharma (2011, 2013), Ohlan (2016), Gupta
et al. (2016), and Dass et al. (2019) suggested exponential entropies
for IFS. Ye and Cui (2018) suggested that the conventional NSS
measure of exponential measurement be compared with existing
NHS implementation measures to demonstrate the validity and
usefulness of the suggested SNEE procedures through
mathematical examples. Lastly, the exponential measure developed
for conventional NCMs was implemented to the N-value
multivariate decision-making example, with interval values to
elucidate the implementation of the recommended SNEE measure.
2. PRELIMINARIES
The fuzzy set of A in X is defined by the membership function
𝜇𝐴 (𝑥), which associates with all points of real X in the interval
[0,1], with the value 𝜇𝐴 (𝑥) at x representing the degree of
membership of X in A i.e.,
𝐴= {〈𝑥, 𝜇𝐴 (𝑥)〉|𝑥 ∈ 𝑋} (2)
For each Atanassov’s (1986) intuitionistic fuzzy set A in X, if
𝜋𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 ) = 1 − 𝜇𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 ) − ν𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 )
then πA(x) is called the Atanassov’s (1986) intuitionistic index (or
a hesitation degree) of the element x ∈ X to A.
Deluca and Termini (1971) demarcated fuzzy measure based on
Shannon’s probabilistic entropy measure which is given below:
1 𝜇𝐴̃ (𝑥𝑖 )𝑙𝑜𝑔(𝜇𝐴̃ (𝑥𝑖 )) +
H(𝐴̃) = − ∑𝑛𝑖=1 [ ]
𝑛 (1 − 𝜇𝐴̃ (𝑥𝑖 ))𝑙𝑜𝑔(1 − 𝜇𝐴̃ (𝑥𝑖 ))
(3)
Later, Bhandari and Pal (1993) demarcated the subsequent
exponential fuzzy entropy equiv alent to Pal and Pal (1989) as
1
𝑛
𝐻𝑃𝑃 (𝐴) = ∑[𝜇𝐴(𝑥𝑖 )𝑒1−𝜇𝐴 (𝑥𝑖) + (1 − 𝜇𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 ))𝑒 𝜇𝐴 (𝑥𝑖) − 1]
𝑛(√𝑒 − 1)
𝑖=1
(4)
3. Parametric Generalized Exponential Entropy on IFS
Established on the allowance of intuitionistic fuzzy exponential
measure, we intend two new generalized parametric exponential
entropies for intuitionistic fuzzy set as
; ISSN 0973 – 5658
A new parametric generalized exponential entropy measure on intuitionistic vague sets
𝐸 𝑇𝐴 (𝐴) = Again differentiating (8) with respect to 𝑌𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 ), we have
𝑛 𝜇𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 )𝑒 (1−𝜇𝐴 (𝑥𝑖)) + {(1 − 𝜇𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 ))𝑒 𝜇𝐴 (𝑥𝑖) − 1}
1
∑ [ + ν𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 )𝑒 (1−ν𝐴 (𝑥𝑖)) + {(1 − ν𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 ))𝑒 ν𝐴(𝑥𝑖) − 1} ] 𝜕 2 𝑓(𝑌𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 ))
2𝑛(𝑒 0.5 − 1) ⌊ 2 ⌋ <0
𝑖=1
+ 𝜋𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 )𝑒 (1−𝜋𝐴 (𝑥𝑖)) + {(1 − 𝜋𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 ))𝑒 𝜋𝐴(𝑥𝑖) − 1} 𝜕(𝑌𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 )) 𝑌
𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 )=0.5
(5)
and Therefore 𝑓(𝑌𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 )) is a concave function and the minima occurs at
𝑌𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 ) = 0.5 is
1 1 2 × 0.5 × 𝑒 0.5
𝐸𝛾𝑇𝐴 (𝐴) = −𝛾 × 𝑓(0.5) = 0.5 [0.5𝑒 0.5 + (1 − 0.5)𝑒 0.5 − 1] =
2𝑛(21−𝛾 𝑒1−2 − 1) 𝑒 −1 √𝑒 − 1
𝛾 𝛾 𝛾
(𝑥𝑖 ))
𝜇𝐴𝛾 (𝑥𝑖 )𝑒 (1−𝜇𝐴 + {(1 − 𝜇𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 )) 𝑒 1−(1−𝜇𝐴 (𝑥𝑖)) − 1} √𝑒 − 1
𝑛 = =1
𝛾 𝛾
∑ + ν𝐴𝛾 (𝑥𝑖 )𝑒 (1−ν𝐴 (𝑥𝑖)) + {(1 − ν𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 )) 𝑒 1−(1−ν𝐴(𝑥𝑖)) − 1}
𝛾
√𝑒 − 1
𝑖=1
Thus, we can write the above measure in the following form:
𝛾 𝛾 𝛾 𝑛
𝛾 (1−𝜋𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 ))
[+ 𝜋𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 )𝑒 + {(1 − 𝜋𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 )) 𝑒 1−(1−𝜋𝐴(𝑥𝑖)) − 1} ] 1
𝐸 𝑇𝐴 (𝐴) = ∑[𝑓(𝜇𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 )) + 𝑓(ν𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 )) + 𝑓(𝜋𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 ))]
𝟎≤𝜸≤𝟐 (6) 2𝑛
𝑖=1
Theorem 3.1 The generalized parametric exponential intuitionistic and
fuzzy information measures 𝐸 𝑇𝐴 (𝐴) and 𝐸𝛾𝑇𝐴 (𝐴) are valid measures. 1
𝑛
𝑇𝐴 (𝐴) 𝛾 𝛾
Proof: We establish axioms that Szmidt and Kacprzyk (2001) justify 𝐸𝛾 = −𝛾 ∑ [𝑓 (𝜇𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 )) + 𝑓 (ν𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 ))
2𝑛(21−𝛾 𝑒1−2 − 1)
our proposed measures. 𝑖=1
𝛾
(P1) Sharpness: The projected measure (5) and (6) obviously fulfil + 𝑓 (𝜋𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 ))]
P1 i.e. measure proposed above give minimum value iff the set is (P3) Resolution: To verify that 𝐸 𝑇𝐴 (𝐴) and 𝐸𝛾𝑇𝐴 (𝐴) fulfil
non-fuzzy or crisp set. resolution axiom, it is adequate to demonstrate that the function
From (6), we have 𝑓(𝑌𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 )) is declining when 𝑌𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 ) > 1/2 and growing when
𝑬𝑻𝑨 (𝑨) 𝑌𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 ) < 1/2.
(𝟏−𝝁 (𝒙 )) 𝝁 (𝒙 )
𝒏 𝝁𝑨 (𝒙𝒊)𝒆 𝑨 𝒊 + {(𝟏 − 𝝁𝑨 (𝒙𝒊 ))𝒆 𝑨 𝒊 − 𝟏} As
𝟏
= ∑ [ + 𝛎𝑨 (𝒙𝒊 )𝒆(𝟏−𝛎𝑨(𝒙𝒊 )) + {(𝟏 − 𝛎𝑨 (𝒙𝒊 ))𝒆𝛎𝑨(𝒙𝒊) − 𝟏} ] 𝜕𝑓(𝑌𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 ))
𝟐𝒏(𝒆𝟎.𝟓 − 𝟏) = (1 − 𝑌𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 ))𝑒 𝑌𝐴 (𝑥𝑖) − 𝑌𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 )𝑒 𝑌𝐴 (𝑥𝑖)
𝒊=𝟏
+ 𝝅𝑨 (𝒙𝒊 )𝒆(𝟏−𝝅𝑨(𝒙𝒊 )) + {(𝟏 − 𝝅𝑨 (𝒙𝒊 ))𝒆𝝅𝑨(𝒙𝒊 ) − 𝟏} 𝜕𝑌𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 )
𝟏 We observe that E(A) is growing for 𝑌𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 ) in [0, 1/2) and
= 𝟐𝒏(√𝒆−𝟏) ∑𝒏𝒊=𝟏[𝟏. 𝒆(𝟏−𝟏) + {(𝟏 − 𝟏)𝒆𝟏 − 𝟏} + 𝟎 + 𝟎] = 𝟎
declining for 𝑌𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 ) in (1/2, 1]. Hence,
or 𝑌𝐴∗ (𝑥𝑖 ) ≤ 𝑌𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 )
𝑬𝑻𝑨 (𝑨) 𝐸 𝑇𝐴
(A*) ≤ 𝐸 𝑇𝐴 (A) in [0, 0.5) (9)
𝒏 𝝁𝑨 (𝒙𝒊)𝒆(𝟏−𝝁𝑨(𝒙𝒊 )) + {(𝟏 − 𝝁𝑨 (𝒙𝒊 ))𝒆𝝁𝑨(𝒙𝒊) − 𝟏} 𝑌𝐴∗(𝑥𝑖 ) ≥ 𝑌𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 )
𝟏
= ∑ [ + 𝛎𝑨 (𝒙𝒊)𝒆(𝟏−𝛎𝑨(𝒙𝒊 )) + {(𝟏 − 𝛎𝑨 (𝒙𝒊 ))𝒆𝛎𝑨(𝒙𝒊) − 𝟏} ] 𝐸 𝑇𝐴 (A*) ≥ 𝐸 𝑇𝐴 (A) in (0.5, 1] (10)
𝟐𝒏(𝒆𝟎.𝟓 − 𝟏)
𝒊=𝟏
+ 𝝅𝑨 (𝒙𝒊 )𝒆(𝟏−𝝅𝑨(𝒙𝒊 )) + {(𝟏 − 𝝅𝑨 (𝒙𝒊 ))𝒆𝝅𝑨(𝒙𝒊 ) − 𝟏} (P4) Symmetry: Since the compliment of 𝐴 = {< 𝑥𝑖 , 𝜇𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 ),
𝟎. 𝒆 (𝟏−𝟎)
+ {(𝟏 − 𝟎)𝒆𝟎 − 𝟏} ν𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 ), 𝜋𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 ) > |𝑥𝑖 ∊ 𝑋} is 𝐴𝑐 = {< 𝑥𝑖 , ν𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 ), 𝜇𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 ), 1 −
𝟏 𝒏
= 𝟐𝒏(√𝒆−𝟏) ∑𝒊=𝟏 [+ 𝟎𝒆 (𝟏−𝟎)
+ {(𝟏 − 𝟎)𝒆𝟎 − 𝟏} ]=0 𝜇𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 ) − ν𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 ), > |𝑥𝑖 ∊ 𝑋} i.e. [𝜇𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 )]𝑐 = ν𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 ); [ν𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 )]𝑐 =
+ 𝟏𝒆 (𝟏−𝟏)
+ {(𝟏 − 𝟏)𝒆𝟏 − 𝟏} 𝜇𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 ) and [𝜋𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 )]𝑐 = 1 − 𝜋𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 ) ∀ 𝑥𝑖 ∊ 𝑋 , we get
Thus, 𝐸 𝑇𝐴 (𝐴) = 0, if A = {< 𝑥𝑖 , 1, 0, 0 > |𝑥𝑖 ∊ 𝑋} 𝑜r A = 𝐸 𝑇𝐴 (𝐴𝑐 ) = 𝐸 𝑇𝐴 (𝐴)
𝐸𝛾𝑇𝐴 (𝐴𝑐 ) = 𝐸𝛾𝑇𝐴 (𝐴)
{< 𝑥𝑖 , 0, 0, 1 > |𝑥𝑖 ∊ 𝑋}. Since 𝐸 𝑇𝐴 (𝐴)
and 𝐸𝛾𝑇𝐴 (𝐴) satisfy all the essential axioms of
Similarly, it can be proved that Thus, 𝐸𝛾𝑇𝐴 (𝐴) = 0, if A is crisp. intuitionistic exponential fuzzy entropy measure, therefore 𝐸 𝑇𝐴 (𝐴)
(P2) Maximality: Let us consider the following function and 𝐸𝛾𝑇𝐴 (𝐴) are valid measures of new parametric measure of IFS.
1
𝑓(𝑌𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 )) = 𝑒 0.5−1 [𝑌𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 )𝑒 (1−𝑌𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 )) + {(1 − 𝑌𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 ))𝑒 𝑌𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 ) − 1}] Corollaries:
(1) The measure (6) is a special case of measure (5) when 𝛼 → 1
(7)
irrespective of the constants.
Differentiating (7) with respect to 𝑌𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 ), we get
(2) In the absence of Atanassov’s intuitionistic index (or a hesitation
degree) of the element 𝑥𝑖 ∊ 𝑋 to A, the measure (5) reduces to
𝜕𝑓(𝑌𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 ))
= 𝑒 (1−𝑌𝐴 (𝑥𝑖)) − 𝑌𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 )𝑒 (1−𝑌𝐴(𝑥𝑖)) − 𝑒 𝑌𝐴 (𝑥𝑖) measure proposed by Pal and Pal (1989).
𝜕𝑌𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 )
It is observed that kurtosis of 𝐸𝛾𝑇𝐴 (𝐴) varies as the value of
+ (1 − 𝑌𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 ))𝑒 𝑌𝐴 (𝑥𝑖) parameter 𝛼 assumes different values within the specified range as
shown. Thus, inclusion of parameter provides more flexibility to
entropy measure which helps in dealing with data practically. It has
= (1 − 𝑌𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 ))𝑒 𝑌𝐴 (𝑥𝑖) − 𝑌𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 )𝑒 𝑌𝐴 (𝑥𝑖) (8)
been supported by Andargie and Rao (2013). So the suitable value
𝜕𝑓(𝑌𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 ))
= (1 − 𝑌𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 ))𝑒 𝑌𝐴 (𝑥𝑖) − 𝑌𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 )𝑒 𝑌𝐴 (𝑥𝑖) = 0 of parameter 𝛼 assists practical modeling of data.
𝜕𝑌𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 )
Apart from the above-mentioned axioms the anticipated measure
or (1 − 𝑌𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 ))𝑒 𝑌𝐴 (𝑥𝑖) = 𝑌𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 )𝑒 𝑌𝐴 (𝑥𝑖) also fulfills the subsequent possessions:
The critical value of 𝑌𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 ) exists when 𝑌𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 ) = 0.5 for 𝑥𝑖 ∊ 𝑋. Theorem 3.2 Assume A and B be two fuzzy sets then for 𝐸 𝑇𝐴 (A)
Copy Right © BIJIT – ISSN 0973 – 5658
 BIJIT - BVICAM’s International Journal of Information Technology
𝛾 𝛾
subsequent can be tested (0.5)𝛾 𝑒 (1−(0.5) ) + {(1 − 0.5)𝛾 𝑒1−(0.5) − 1}
𝐸 𝑇𝐴 (AUB) + 𝐸 𝑇𝐴 (A∩B) = 𝐸 𝑇𝐴 (A) + 𝐸 𝑇𝐴 (B) 𝛾
∑𝑛𝑖=1 [+ (0.5)𝛾 𝑒 (1−(0.5) ) + {(1 − 0.5)𝛾 𝑒1−(0.5) − 1} ]
𝛾

Proof: Split the universe of discourse into two subgroups + 0. 𝑒 (1−0) + {(1 − 0)𝑒 0 − 1}
−𝛼 −𝛼
2−𝛼 𝑒 (1−2 ) + {2−𝛼 𝑒 (1−2 ) − 1}
Atanassov’s intuitionistic index of the element 𝑥𝑖 ∊ 𝑋 (considering 1 𝑛
= 2𝑛(21−𝛼𝑒 1−2−𝛼−1) ∑𝑖=1 [+ 2−𝛼 𝑒 (1−2−𝛼) + {2−𝛼 𝑒 (1−2−𝛼) − 1} ]
𝜋𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 ) = 0) as
1 −𝛼 )
= −𝛼 ∑𝑛𝑖=1 2 [21−𝛼 𝑒 (1−2 − 1] = 1
2𝑛(21−𝛼 𝑒 1−2 −1)
Yet over, assume the set A be minimum intuitionistic fuzzy then
𝜇𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 ) = ν𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 ) = 𝜋𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 ) = 0 for every i. Then, 𝐸(𝐴) = 0 and
That is, for all 𝑥𝑖 ∊ 𝛺1 𝐸𝛼 (𝐴) = 0.

4. NUMERICAL EXAMPLE
Assume 𝐴 = {< 𝑥𝑖 , 𝜇𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 ), ν𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 ), 𝜋𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 ) > |𝑥𝑖 ∊ 𝑋} be an
and for all 𝑥𝑖 ∊ 𝛺2 intuitionistic fuzzy set in 𝑋 = {𝑥1 , 𝑥2 , … 𝑥𝑛 }. Then we define
intuitionistic fuzzy set on universal set A (De et al. 2001) as follows:
𝐴𝑛 = {< 𝑥𝑖 , [𝜇𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 )]𝑛 , 1 − [1 − ν𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 )]𝑛 , 1 − [1 −
Then, it is easily proved by adding 𝐸 𝑇𝐴 (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) with 𝐸 𝑇𝐴 (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) 𝜋𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 )]𝑛 > |𝑥𝑖 ∊ 𝑋} (15)
We consider an intuitionistic fuzzy set A on X which is deified as
to get (𝑥1 , 0.1,0.8,0.1), (𝑥2 , 0.3,0.5,0.2), (𝑥3 , 0.5,0.4,0.1),
𝐴={ }
𝐸 𝑇𝐴 (AUB) + 𝐸 𝑇𝐴 (A∩B) = 𝐸 𝑇𝐴 (A) + 𝐸 𝑇𝐴 (B) (11) (𝑥4 , 0.7,0.2,0.1), (𝑥5 , 1.0,0,0)
As per the assistance of processes demarcated in (22), the
Likewise, we can demonstrate that subsequent intuitionistic fuzzy sets are formed:
𝐸𝛾𝑇𝐴 (AUB) + 𝐸𝛾𝑇𝐴 (A∩B) = 𝐸𝛾𝑇𝐴 (A) + 𝐸𝛾𝑇𝐴 (B) (12) 𝐴, 𝐴2 , 𝐴3 , 𝐴4 which are as follows:
 𝐴 as “Large”
Corollary: Assume A be intuitionistic fuzzy set then Ac is too an  𝐴2 as “Very Large”
intuitionistic fuzzy set, therefore by dint of the above proposition  𝐴3 as “Quite Very Large”
 𝐴4 as “Very Very Large”
𝐸 𝑇𝐴 (A U Ac) + 𝐸 𝑇𝐴 (A ∩ Ac) = 𝐸 𝑇𝐴 (A) + 𝐸 𝑇𝐴 (Ac) (13)
Consequently, these operating outcomes can be specified as
and 𝐸𝛾𝑇𝐴 (A U Ac) + 𝐸𝛾𝑇𝐴 (A ∩ Ac) = 𝐸𝛾𝑇𝐴 (A) + Eα (Ac) (14)
𝐴𝑛 𝑥1 𝑥2 𝑥3 𝑥4 𝑥5
𝑇𝐴 (𝐴)
Theorem 3.3 𝐸 and 𝐸𝛾𝑇𝐴 (𝐴) achieves the extreme worth
A <0.1,0.8,0.1> <0.3,0.5,0.2> <0.5,0.4,0.1> <0.7,0.2,0.1> <1.0,0,0>
when 𝐴2 <0.01, 0.96, <0.09, 0.75, <0.25, 0.64, <0.49, <1.0,0,0>
the set is utmost intuitionistic fuzzy and the smallest when the set is 0.19> 0.36> 0.19> 0.36,0.19>

minutest intuitionistic fuzzy. 𝐴3 <0.001, <0.027, <0.125, 0.784, <0.343, <1.0,0,0>

0.992, 0.271> 0.875, 0.488> 0.271> 0.488, 0.271>
Proof. We have previously showed that 𝐸 𝑇𝐴 (𝐴) and 𝐸𝛾𝑇𝐴 (𝐴)
exclusively gets its extreme value iff 𝜇𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 ) = 0.5 = ν𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 ) and 𝐴4 <0.000,0.998, <0.008, <0.063, 0.870, <0.240, <1.0,0,0>
𝜋𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 ) = 0 that is, A is greatest intuitionistic fuzzy and lowest 0.344> 0.938, 0.590> 0.344> 0.590, 0.344>
when A is a crispy set. Thus, to demonstrate the outcome, it’s
sufficient to display that extreme and least values are autonomous Now we consider these intuitionistic fuzzy set to find the value of
of 𝛾 for 𝐸𝛾𝑇𝐴 (A). Assume the set A be greatest intuitionistic fuzzy, projected entropy measures for diverse values of 𝛼 in the following
then 𝜇𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 ) = 0.5 = ν𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 ) and 𝜋𝐴 (𝑥𝑖 ) = 0 for all i. Then, 𝐸 𝑇𝐴 table:
(A) is given by Proposed
1 1
1 1
𝑒
(1− )
2 + {(1 − 2) 𝑒 2 − 1} Entropy 𝐸𝛼 (𝐴) 𝐸𝛼 (𝐴2 ) 𝐸𝛼 (𝐴3 ) 𝐸𝛼 (𝐴4 )
2
1 Measure
= ∑𝑛𝑖=1 1 1
1 1
2𝑛(√𝑒−1) + 𝑒 (1−2) + {(1 − ) 𝑒 2 − 1} 𝐸𝛼 (𝐴)
2 2
[ +0+ 0 ] 𝛼 = 0.1 1.189117 1.181449 1.163526 1.140203
1 1 𝛼 = 0.5 1.025341 0.97353 0.888929 0.811941
1 1
2
𝑒2 + 2 𝑒2 − 1 𝛼 = 0.7 0.976575 0.924172 0.840219 0.76421
1
= ∑𝑛𝑖=1 [ 1 1
1 1 ] 𝛼 = 0.8 0.845666 0.803347 0.730904 0.663004
2𝑛(√𝑒−1) + 2 𝑒2 + 2 𝑒2 − 1 𝛼 = 1.0 0.809067 0.771176 0.703149 0.63861
𝛼 = 1.1 0.776107 0.742413 0.678588 0.617487
1
1 1
= ∑𝑛𝑖=1 (2𝑒 2 − 2) = × 2𝑛(√𝑒 − 1) = 1 𝛼 = 1.2 0.746599 0.716692 0.656772 0.599092
2𝑛(√𝑒−1) 2𝑛(√𝑒−1)
𝛼 = 1.6 0.675924 0.654502 0.604367 0.556276
and
1 𝛼 = 1.8 0.640096 0.622265 0.577306 0.534855
𝐸𝛾𝑇𝐴 (𝐴) = × 𝛼 = 1.9 0.607045 0.591891 0.551834 0.515044
2𝑛(21−𝛾 𝑒 1−2−𝛾 − 1)
𝛼 = 2.0 0.582101 0.568648 0.532347 0.500044

Copy Right © BIJIT – ; ISSN 0973 – 5658

A new parametric generalized exponential entropy measure on intuitionistic vague sets
International Journal of Information Technology. 6(1): 690-
Human logical and intuitive considerations require measures of 696.
these IFS to meet status order (Li et al., 2003) as [8] Dass, B., Tomar, V.P. and Kumar, K. (2019). Fuzzy Entropy
𝐸𝛼 (𝐴) ≻ 𝐸𝛼 (𝐴2 ) ≻ 𝐸𝛼 (𝐴3 ) ≻ 𝐸𝛼 (𝐴4 ) where the symbol ≻ with Order and Degree for Intuitionistic fuzzy set., 2142
means “superior to”. (170022): 1-11.
Hence, the conduct of projected entropy 𝑬𝜶 (𝑨) is also consistent [9] De, S. K., Biswas, R. and Roy, A. R. An application of
for the perspective of organized dialectal variables. intuitionistic fuzzy sets in medical diagnosis. Fuzzy Sets and
Systems, 117: 209–213.
5. CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE WORK [10] Deluca,A. and Termini, S. (1972). A Definition of a Non-
Entropy is a significant measure to address vagueness. In this Probabilistic Entropy in the Setting of fuzzy sets theory.
communication, we propose a measure of intensity as per the Information and Control, 20, 301-312.
notion of a set of IFS. Consequently, properties of the exponential [11] Deshpande, A., Yadav, J. and Kharat, V. (2014). Zadeh-
measure for the intuitive set of values are deliberated which are as Deshpande Approach for Fuzzy Description of Air and Water
per the obvious meaning of the entropy measure discussed by Quality. BIJIT - BVICAM’s International Journal of
Gupta et al. (2016). In addition, the efficiency of the anticipated Information Technology. 6(1): 677-681.
entropy quantity at diverse beliefs of 𝜶 is equated using examples. [12] Gupta, P., Arora, H.D. and Tiwari P. (2014). On Some
Although extreme and lowest entropy values do not depend on α Generalized Exponential Entropy for Fuzzy Sets. Proceeding
values, but entropy is stable with a designed linguistic variable if of 3rd International Conference on Reliability, Infocom
𝜶 > 𝟎. Technologies and Optimization (ICRITO) (Trends and
With the advancement in the new directions that opens the above Future Directions), Oct 8-10: 309-311.
measure can also be applied to areas such as development of [13] Gupta, P., Arora, H.D. and Tiwari, P. (2016). Generalized
generalized inaccuracy measure for fuzzy / intuitionistic fuzzy sets. entropy for intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Malaysian Journal of
The above study can also be useful in finding applications of Mathematical Sciences, 10(2): 209-220.
developed decision-making algorithms in different real-life [14] Hung, W. L. and Yang, M. S. (2006). Fuzzy Entropy on
problems including human resource management, facility location Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets. International Journal of Intelligent
selection, medical diagnosis etc. The utility / weighted exponential Systems, 21: 443-451.
entropy is another way to express the above measure. [15] Kaufmann, A. (1980). Fuzzy subsets: Fundamental
The findings display that the intuitionistic fuzzy set is optimal tool Theoretical Elements.Academic Press, New York, 3.
to solve the uncertainty and fuzziness in the multiple criteria [16] Lamba A., and Kumar, D. (2016). Optimization of KNN with
decision-making problem by considering the membership Firefly Algorithm. BIJIT - BVICAM’s International Journal
function, non-membership function. So far, there are many of Information Technology, 8(2): 997-1003.
information measures that have applied intuitionistic fuzzy [17] Ohlan, A. and Ohlan R. (2016). Generalized Exponential
atmosphere in many real-life applications. In future, there are new fuzzy information measures. Springer International
possibilities to develop new information measures for distinct Publishing Switzerland, 1:1-146.
interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. [18] Pal, N.R., Pal, S.K. (1989). Object background segmentation
using new definitions of entropy. IEEE Proc., 366: 284–295.
6. REFERENCES [19] Peerzada,S.,Sofi S.M. and Nisa,R.(2017).A New Generalized
[1] Andargie, A., & Rao, K. S. (2013). Estimation of a Linear Fuzzy Information Measure and its Properties. International
Model with Two Parameter Symmetric Platukurtic Journal of Advance Research in Science and Engineering,
Distributes Errors. Journal of Uncertanity Analysis and 6(12): 1647-1654.
Application, 1: 1-19. [20] Renyi, A. (1961). On Measures of Entropy and Information.
[2] Arimoto,S.C. (1971). Information-Theoretic Fourth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematics, Statistics and
Considerations on Estimation problems. Information and Probability, Vol. I, University of California Press, Berkeley,
Control, 19:181-190. Calif., 541-561.
[3] Atanassov, K.(1986). Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets [21] Shannon, C. E. (1948). A Mathematical Theory of
Syst., 20, 87–96. Communication. The Bell System Technical Journal, 27:
[4] Bhandari, D. & Pal, N. R. (1993). Some new information 379-423.
measures for fuzzy sets. Information Sciences, 67: 204 – [22] Sharma, B.D. and Taneja,I.J. (1975).Entropies of Type α, β
228. and Other Generalized Measures of Information Theory.
[5] Burillo, P. and Bustince, H. (1996). Entropy on Mathematika,22: 202-215.
intuitionistic fuzzy sets and interval-valued fuzzy sets. [23] Szmidt, E. and Kacprzyk, J. (2001). Entropy for Intuitionistic
Fuzzy Set Systems, 78: 305-316. Fuzzy Sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 118: 467-477.
[6] Chaira, T. and Ray, A. K. (2008). A new measure using [24] Szmidt, E. and Kacprzyk, J. (2005). A New Measure of
intuitionistic fuzzy set theory and its application to edge Entropy and Its Connection with a Similarity Measure for
detection. Journal of Applied Soft Computing, 8(2):919- Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets.EUSFLATLFA, 461-466.
927. [25] Verma, R. and Sharma, B. D. (2011). On Generalized
[7] Chaudhary, A., Tiwari, V.N. and Kumar, A. (2014). Exponential Fuzzy Entropy. World Academy of Science,
Analysis of Fuzzy Logic Based Intrusion Detection Systems Engineering and Technology, 60: 1402-1405.
in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks. BIJIT - BVICAM’s [26] Verma, R. and Sharma, B. D. (2013). Exponential entropy on
Copy Right © BIJIT – ISSN 0973 – 5658
 BIJIT - BVICAM’s International Journal of Information Technology
intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Kybernetika, 49(1):114-127.
[27] Vlachos, I. K. and Sergiadis, G. D. (2007). Intuitionistic
fuzzy information an application to pattern recognition.
Pattern Recognition Letters, 28: 197-206.
[28] Ye, J. (2010). Two Elective Measures of Intuitionistic
Fuzzy Entropy. Computing, 87: 55-62.
[29] Ye, J. and Cui, W. (2018). Exponential entropy for
simplified neuromorphic sets and its applications in
decision making. Entropy, 20(357): 1-10.
[30] Zadeh, L.A. (1965). Fuzzy Sets. Information and Control,
8, 338-353.
[31] Zhang, Q. S. and Jiang, S. Y. (2008). A note on
Information Entropy Measure for Vague Sets. Inform.
Sci., 21: 4184–4191.

Copy Right © BIJIT – ; ISSN 0973 – 5658