You are on page 1of 54

BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS

AGENDA
Name of the Committee No. of Date & Time Day Venue
Meeting

Automotive Body, Chassis, Thirty 22nd December Wednes WebEx Meeting


Accessories, Springs and Second 2021 day
Suspension Systems Sectional (32nd) (10.30 AM onwards)
Committee, TED 6

CHAIRMAN: SHRI M. SREENIVASULU MEMBER SECRETARY: Mr. Gaurav Jayaswal


Head (TED): Mr. R.R. Singh

ITEM 0 WELCOME ADDRESS


0.1 Welcome Remarks by Head (TED)
0.2 Opening Remarks by the Chairman

ITEM 1 CONFIRMATION OF THE MINUTES OF LAST MEETING

The Minutes of 31st Meeting of ‘Automotive Body, Chassis, Accessories, springs and
Suspension Systems Sectional Committee, TED-6’, held through WEBEX on 22nd September
2021 were circulated vide our email letter no.TED6/A-2.31 dated 26th October 2021.No
comments on the recording of the Minutes have been received and hence the committee may
formally confirm the minutes of the meeting.

ITEM 2 SCOPE & COMPOSITION OF THE SECTIONAL COMMITTEE

2.0 Scope of SC TED 06 :

As per the minutes of 28th Meeting of Transport Engineering Division Council (TEDC)
Meeting held on 20th October 2021, A new Sectional Committee TED 34 has been
formed under the chairmanship of Shri V.V. Shinde, Deputy Director, Structural
Dynamics Lab (SDL), ARAI to specifically deal with the standards related to Springs
and Suspension Systems. Its Scope will be as follows:

“Standardization of Shock absorbers & Springs including Automotive springs


containing engine rocker arm springs and suspension systems.”

In view of creation of TED 34, the Division Council approved the modified the
Title, Scope and Composition of TED 06 as follows :

Modified Title of TED 06 : Automotive Body, Chassis and Accessories Sectional


Committee

Modified Scope of TED 06: “Standardization of chassis assembly, aerodynamics


and ergonomic aspects of vehicles and the body, body fittings, seats, vehicle
accessories and garage equipment etc.”
Chairman: SHRI M. SREENIVASULU

The Committee may please note.

2.1 As a matter of policy, composition of Sectional Committees is to be reviewed to replace


the persons who are continuing for longer periods, to co-opt the members / organizations
which are capable of contributing in emerging new technologies and new areas of work
and strength of the manufacturers should be restricted to 1/3rd of the total strength of the
Technical Committees.

2.2 As per Item 2.3 of the Minutes of last Meeting, the Committee decided the following:

Co-Option :

To co-opt the following organizations in TED-6:

Sl No. Name of the Organization Action taken


1. M/s Diamler India Commercial Vehicles pvt Nomination is received and the same
Ltd. is updated on BIS Portal.
2. M/s Skoda Auto Volkswagen India Pvt.Ltd. Nomination is received and the same
is updated on BIS Portal.
3. M/s Force Motors Nomination in the prescribed format is
awaited.
4. M/s Pilkington Automotive India Private Nomination in the prescribed format is
Limited ( NSG Group) awaited.

Following new co option requests have been received from following Persons/Organizations :

Sl. NAME ORGANIZATION NAME


No.
1. Swapnil Tambe Others
2. Pulkit Jindal Others

The committee may discuss and decide.

2.3 The present composition of Automotive Body, Chassis, Accessories, Springs and
Suspension Systems Sectional Committee, TED 6 is given in Annex-I.The list shows
attendance of the members in the last three consecutive meetings and also their status as
manufacturer, consumer, R&D institution, etc. The representation of members who have not
attended the last 3 meetings of the sectional committee is to be reviewed as per guidelines.

It may be noted that as a matter of policy of standard formulation, in the composition of all
committees, efforts shall be made to keep the strength of committee at optimum. New
members may be co-opted where necessary and minimum 2/3rd strength should be taken from
non-industrial organizations. NGOs, where ever possible, should also be co-opted. Based on
these guidelines, and also considering the interest shown by member organizations in the
committee, the committee may review its composition. The committee can decide co-option of
any more organizations whose inclusion will be helpful in the committee’s work and also
propose whose representation should be withdrawn.
2.4 Effort should be made to include young professionals and scientists in the Committee.
In this regard, earlier, a letter from DDG (Stdzn) was sent to all the members, soliciting the
name of an additional alternate member from young professionals from the member
organizations. The members are requested to respond positively to it.

2.5 The Committee may suggest means for identification and involvement of talent available
in the country related to the subject dealt by the committee and methodology to involve them
in the proceedings of the Committee. The Committee may also suggest means and ways to
enhance the participation of the members in Committee work through participation in the
meeting or sending comments on the documents.

The committee may deliberate and decide on further continuation / deletion of these
organizations.

ITEM 3 ISSUES ARISING OUT OF THE MINUTES OF THE LAST MEETING

The summary of actions taken on the Minutes of previous meeting and the decisions taken by
the committee during the meeting are given below:

Sl no. Item / Previous Decisions Decision in the last meetings Current


Status
1. Doc : TED 6(13631) W Draft The draft document was forwarded by The
Amendment No. 1 to IS 13943 : 2017 Shri P.S. Gowrishankar to BIS and document
Automotive Vehicles – Wheel was included in the Agenda of the last has been
Guards For Vehicles of M1 Category meeting. The Committee examined printed.
– Performance Requirements (First the document and observed that it
Revision)- The document was issued needs some editorial corrections. The
under WC & the last date for comments The Committee requested Bajaj Auto committee
was 28.2.2019. The Committee to modify the document and forward it may please
requested Shri P.S. Gowrishankar to to BIS for printing after taking the note.
study and prepare a draft document. approval of Chairman, TED-6.

Document was awaited from Bajaj


Auto Ltd.

Decision in 29th Meeting : Bajaj Auto


Ltd promised to forward the document
to BIS within a week time.

Decision in 30th Meeting : The draft


Document has been from Bajaj Auto
via email dt. 14/05/2021. The
document was sent for TEDC Chair
approval and the approval has been
received dt. 15/06/2021.

The document has been sent for


printing dt. 17/06/2021. The
committee Noted.

Decision in 31st Meeting :


The document has been sent for
publication.

The committee noted.

2. Doc. TED 06 (17774) F Draft Decision in 29th Meeting: The draft


Amendment No. 3 to IS 2553 (Part 2): Representative from Maruti Suzuki amendment
2019 Safety Glass – Specification - India Ltd thanked the Committee & 4 has been
Part 2 – For Road Transport (First BIS for getting the Amendment no.1 received from
Revision) - The revised standard was printed at earliest. Mr. Feroz
published in 2019. khan, Hero
The Committee discussed the status Motocorp
Earlier, comments came from Maruti of comments received on IS 2553 and is
Suzuki and the same was sent for wide (part-2): 2019.The representative of attached as
circulation (with the approval of Tractors Manufacturer’s Association Annexure 2
Chairman) vide email dt 10.1.2020. The (TMA) promised to send a draft of the
Committee finalized the Amendment amendment to IS 2553 (part-2): 2019 Agenda of
no.1 to IS 2553 (part-2): 2019 & the by end of Oct 2020 (after 32nd Meeting.
same was printed in March 2020. incorporating all the suggestions
given in the matter). The same can be The
Some more comments were received sent for wide circulation with the committee
from (i) CMD, BIS (ii) Saint Gobain; & approval of Chairman. may decide
(iii) Toyota. The same were examined to send the
by the Committee and the Committee Based on presentation given by Mr document for
requested Mr Feroze Khan to hold a Vishal Rawal, ARAI & as per Annex- Wide
Panel Meeting and prepare draft A of this Minutes, the Committee Circulation.
Amendment and forward it to Member decided to include Sunroof Glass and
Secretary for wide circulation with the Partitioning Glass in the scope of IS The
approval of Chairman, TED-06. 2553 (part-2): 2019 and text for clarity response is
on aesthetic glass requirements will awaited with
The Committee also requested the be implemented w.e.f. 1st April 2022. regards to
Member Secretary to send a note to Accordingly, the Committee will take- Table 1A of
CMD-3 requesting it for concurrent up the work & will issue Amendment the standard
running of IS 2553 (Pt-2): 1992 & IS by Dec 2021 so that Amendment gets IS 2553 Part
2553 (Pt-2): 2019 as there are some printed by March 2022. 2 – 2019.
implementation issues with the revised
standard for which the Glass & Some members raised an issue &
Automobile industry is also pursuing stated that the date of concurrent
with CMD-3. running of old IS 2553 (part-2) is
mentioned till 29 Nov 2020 in BIS
Some more comments were received & Portal, whereas, the date of
were together compiled in the agenda implementation of QCO as per Govt.
of the last meeting. The total comments of India is 01 April 2021. The
to be discussed were from following Committee therefore requested the
organizations/deptt: Member Secretary to take-up the
matter with CMD & get the information
(i) CMD, BIS, updated in BIS portal.
(ii) Saint Gobain,
(iii) Toyota, Decision in 30th Meeting : The
(iv) John Deere, document has been printed and has
(v) Fuyogo Glass, China been Notified in Gazette of India on
(vi) FCA Engineering India Pvt. Ltd., 23rd March 2021.
Pune
(vii) AIS Glass on the comments of The Committee may please note.
John Deere, Fuyogo Glass & FCA Engg
India Pvt Ltd. Some Comments have been received
(viii) ARAI, and from CMD-III and has been attached
(IX) Tractor Manufacturer Association as Annexure-2.
The Committee may deliberate and
The Committee discussed the decide.
comments in the last meeting. The A new proposal as draft Amendment
observation of Committee on the No. 3 related to roof glazing was
comments of CMD, Saint Gobain were received from Mr. Vishal Rawal
placed at Annex-I & II (Minutes of last through email dt. 12th June 2021 and
meeting). is attached as Annexure -3.
On June 17, Draft Amendment 3 to IS
The committee accepted all the 2553 : Part 2, drafted by RNTBCI was
suggestions of Toyota Kirloskar
Motors Pvt. Ltd as the comments were received from Mr. Feroz Khan and the
editorial in nature. same is attached as Annexure -4.
Comments on the above document
With respect to Comments given by were also received from Mr. Nitish
John Deere India Pvt Ltd, the Seth and are attached as Annexure-5.
chairman stated that he will speak to The committee may deliberate and
Tractors Manufacturers Association decide.
(TMA) & will get back.

With respect to comments of Fuyao It was decided that the comments


Glass Industry & AIS Glass the given by CMD-III Will be discussed
committee requested Mr. Feroz Ali first in the Panel Meeting (with
Khan & his panel to examine the convenorship of Mr. Feroz khan) and
comments and give suggestions. the final decision will be taken in the
next SC Meeting.
With respect to comments of FCA
Engineering India Pvt. Ltd., the
committee felt that as of now, sunroof The committee also decided to form a
glass is not covered in the scope of IS sub panel consisting of Chairman
2553 (Part 2): 2019. However, the TED 06 Mr. Sreenivasulu, Mr. Feroz
committee needs to explore the matter khan, Mr. Rajendra Khile, Mr. Uday
further. He committee requested Mr. Harite, Ms. Vijyenta, Mr. Kishore
Feroz Ali Khan & panel to examine the Kumar keeping BIS in Loop, to finalize
issue and give suggestions. the draft amendment on roof glazing
and send it to BIS for printing in 2
With respect to comments of ARAI, the weeks’ time.
observation of the committee were
placed at Annex-III (Minutes of last
meeting). It was also decided that the additional
comments provided by ARAI would be
With respect to comments of Tractors discussed first in the panel Meeting
Manufacturing Association (TMA), (With the convenorship of Mr. Feroz
the chairman stated that he will discuss khan) and later on a decision on the
the comments with TMA and will get same can be taken by sectional
back soon. Committee in its next meeting.

Panel meeting was held on 26 Aug Document TED 06 (17774) F Draft


2020. The Minutes of Panel meeting Amendment No. 3 to IS 2553 (Part
were forwarded by Mr Feroz Khan vide 2): 2019 Safety Glass –
email dt 01 Sep 2020 & the same are Specification - Part 2 – For Road
enclosed at Annex-II (page 11 to 26). Transport (First Revision) is in the
process of publication and will be
Draft Amendment no. 2 to IS 2553 published soon.
(part-2): 2019 proposed by the panel is
placed at Annex-III (page 27 to 34). A panel Meeting for Discussion on
Proposed Amendment No. 4 to IS
The committee may kindly deliberate 2553 Part 2 : 2019 (With the
and decide. convenorship of Mr. Feroz khan) is
scheduled to take place on 20th
September 2021. The minutes of the
same will be forwarded in to all the
committee members once received
from the Panel Convenor.

Decision in 31st Meeting :


The committee noted the status of
document TED 06 (17774) F.
The Committee asked Hero MotoCorp
to get back to BIS with final draft
Amendment 4 to IS 2553, within a
month time.

Once received it will be sent for Wide


Circulation.

The chairman also promised to get


back to BIS with Formatted Table 1A
, after consultation with TMA.

3. Review of IS 14495: 1998 Automotive In the 28th Meeting of SC TED 06, The status of
Vehicles – Pillion hand Holds for two- Hero MotoCorp was given the Progress on
wheeled vehicles Requirements. responsibility to review the document this
IS 14495:1998. document is
A Draft document has been received awaited from
from Mr. Feroz khan, Hero MotoCorp. the Panel
Convener.

Decision in 30th Meeting :


The committee decided to form a
panel under the convenorship of Mr.
Feroz Khan, Hero MotoCorp, along
with Mr. Nikam from ARAI, Ms.
Vijyenta from ICAT, Mr. P.S.
Gowrishankar from TML and Mr. A V
Kumbhar from Bajaj Auto to discuss
the country specific requirements as
proposed by Mr. Nikam in the SC
Meeting in the draft standard.
The panel was requested to submit
the final document in one month’s
time.

A Panel Meeting was conducted on


12/08/2021 to finalize the draft on
revision of IS 14495: 1998 by Mr.
Feroz khan. The Minutes of the
meeting is awaited. A mail dated
16/09/2021, has been written to Mr.
Feroz khan to forward the minutes of
the meeting for circulation among the
members. The Response is awaited.
The minutes will be circulated as soon
as received.

Decision in 31st Meeting :


The committee noted the status.

It was suggested by members that


one more panel meeting is required to
prepare the final document.
The Panel Convenor promised to
conduct the panel meeting in the
month of October and get back to BIS
with final document after the panel
meeting.
4. Doc TED 6 (14015) : Statutory Plates In 29th Meeting of SC TED 06, it was The final
and Inscriptions for Motor Vehicles their decided to send this document for copy of the
Location and Method of attachment - Printing. document
Vehicle Identification Numbering has been
System Decision in 30th Meeting : The received from
email for approval of TEDC Chairman Mr. Faustino
has been sent on March 19th 2021. and will be
The Committee Noted. sent for
printing after
chair TED 06
A mail had been received from Mr. Approval.
Dinesh G M, TKML dt. 15/07/2021,
indicating that existing document TED The
06(14015) is in line with AIS 065 (upto committee
Amendment 3). Although Amendment may please
No. 4 has also been issued for AIS note.
065 but this existing document [TED
06 (14015)] does not take it into
account.

Hence to avert the requirement for an


amendment at a later stage, The
earlier draft document was modified
and the Amendment No. 4 to AIS 065
was incorporated in the doc. TED 29
(14015). The Modified draft was sent
for comments of the committee
members via email dt. 27/07/2021.

(Please Refer the transcript of the


email in Annexure – II for better
clarity)
No comments have been received on
the document. The committee may
finalize the Modified draft for printing.

Decision in 31st Meeting : The


committee noted the status.

Mr. Faustino from Ashok Leyland


suggested to carry out some editorial
changes with regards to Annexure-1
(Typical Manufacturer’s Plate) of AIS
065 for better clairity.

The committee asked member


secretary to share the word copy of
draft document TED 6 (14015) with
Mr. Faustino for carrying out Editorial
Changes.

The Committee also decided to send


the document for printing after the
final copy is received from Mr.
Faustino with Chairman Approval.

5. Doc TED 06 (16819): DRAFT The draft amendment no. 4 to IS The


AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO IS 14272: 14272: 2011, was received from document is
2011 - AUTOMOTIVE VEHICLES - Chairman TED 6, Mr. Sreenivasulu, with
TYPES - TERMINOLOGY via email dt.2nd Jan 2021 for Wide publication
Circulation. department.
The
The document was sent for wide committee
circulation on 08/01/2021 for 30 days. may note.
(Attached as Annexure - 7)

No comments have been received on


the document. The committee may
deliberate and decide.

Decision in 30th Meeting: The


committee decided to send this
document for printing.

Decision in 31st Meeting :


The document has been sent for
publication dt. 16/08/2021. The
committee noted.

6. Proposal for A proposal has been received from Document


SIAM to issue an amendment to IS TED 06
1. Draft Amendment No.1 to IS 13942 (Part 2) : 2020 through email (17826) has
13942 (Part 2):2020 dt. 26th May 2021. been
received from
2. Draft Amendment No.1 to IS Draft amendment proposal is covering Mr. Faustino
13942 (Part 1):2020 items mentioned as below: and the same
is attached at
3. Draft Amendment No.1 to IS 1. Draft Amendment No.1 to IS Annexure – 3
15943:2012 13942 (Part 2):2020 for
Reference.
4. Draft Amendment No.1 to IS Extension of the scope of IS
16712:2018 13942 (Part 2):2020 to The
include vehicle categories of committee
L7 and 3W>500cc in line with may
current provisions of CMVR & deliberate
clauses addition for brining and decide.
clarity for scope applicability.
Other
2. Draft Amendment No.1 to IS documents
13942 (Part 1):2020 External TED 06
Projections – Performance (17824) &
requirements for other than TED 06
M1 category: (17825) have
the amendment is proposed been sent for
to bring more clarity in the HoD
current text for Wiper blade approval for
external projection printing.
exemption. The draft is
attached as Annexure -8.
3. Draft Amendment No.1 to IS One Editorial
15943:2012 Automotive Comment
Vehicles — Hand-Holds For had been
Three, Four And More Than received on
Four Wheeled Motor Vehicles document
— Specification TED 06
(17822) from
4. Draft Amendment No.1 to IS Ms. Vijyenta
16712:2018 Automotive from ICAT
Vehicles — Spray and the same
Suppression Systems For has been
Two Wheeled Motor attached as
Vehicles. Annexure – 4

The committee may deliberate and The Draft


decide. After
Incorporation
Decision in 30th Meeting: The of this
Committee decided to send all the comment is
four proposed draft amendments also attached
directly to WC. after the
received
All the documents have been sent for comment.
WC as TED 06(17826)W, TED
06(17824)W, TED 06(17825)W, TED The
06( 17822) W committee
may send the
All the documents have completed final
their WC Period of 30 Days and No document
Comments have been received on TED 06
them. (17822) for
printing.
However Some Additional Comments
have been received from Mr. Faustino
V, Ashok Leyland on IS 13942 (Part
2): 2020 and are attached on
Annexure-III.

Since No comments have been


received on the circulated
Amendments, The committee may
finalize these documents for printing.

Decision in 31st Meeting : The


committee discussed the comments
received from Mr. Faustino and
agreed to incorporate all of them
owing to their editorial nature.

The committee decided to send all the


documents for Printing after
incorporation of comments from Mr.
Faustino.
7. Moving IS 13506 from scope of SC A mail has been received from Mr. The
TED 4 to TED 6. Ved Prakash Gauttam, AL dt. March document
15th, 2021, proposing to move IS was sent for
13506 from SC TED 4 to TED 6. WC for 30
days on
The committee may deliberate and 25/10/2021
decide. as TED 06
(18171) W.
Decision in 30th Meeting: It was
decided in SC TED 06 Meeting to shift The
the scope of IS 13506 from TED 04 to comments
TED 06. were
received from
Further administrative processes can Mr.
be undertaken accordingly. Muniyandi P ,
DGQA and
A draft amendment was also are attached
proposed by AL & TML to IS 13506. as Annexure
The committee requested TML to – 5.
send the final document to BIS for
Wide circulation of 30 days.
The
The final document has been received Committee
from TML and attached as Annexure may discuss
– IV. and
deliberate.
The document will be sent for WC in
the BIS Format once SC TED 04
accede to the request to Move IS
13506 from SC TED 04 to SC TED 06.

Decision in 31st Meeting : The


committee noted the status.

8. TED 06 (15877) : Draft Amendment The document was Sent for WC The
No. 2 July 2020 06/08/2020 for 60 days, No document is
To Comments have been received. with
Is 15547 : 2005 Automotive Vehicles ─ publication
Plastic Fuel Tank For Four Wheelers The document was also circulated in department.
Addenda to Agenda for 30th Meeting The
of SC TED 29. committee
may please
Decision in 30th Meeting: There note.
being No Comments, The Committee
decided to send this document for
Printing.

The document was sent for printing dt.


13/08/2021. The committee noted.
9. TED 06 (15878) : Draft Amendment The document was Sent for WC The
No. 2 July 2020 To Is 16219 : 2014 06/08/2020 for 60 days, No document
Automotive Vehicles ─ Metallic Fuel Comments have been received. has been
Tanks ─ Specifications printed.
The document was also circulated in
Addenda to Agenda for 30th Meeting The
of SC TED 29. committee
may note.
Decision in 30th Meeting: There
being No Comments, The Committee
decided to send this document for
Printing.
The document was sent for printing dt.
18/08/2021. The committee noted.

10. TED 06 (14012) : Requirements Of As per the Minutes of last (29th) Document
Temporary Cabin For Drive-Away- Meeting, The Committee requested TED 06
Chassis Configuration/ Vehicles, its members to examine the above (14013) has
documents and state whether these been sent for
TED 06 (14013) : Field Of Vision Of documents are administrative in HoD
Motor Vehicle Drivers For M1 And L7- Nature or Not. approval for
M Category. No Comments have been received in WC of 60
this regard. days.
Kindly find the PDF Version of the
above three documents in attachment No
in the Addenda to Agenda Email. comments
have been
Decision in 30th Meeting: The received on
Committee decided to send the the document
documents TED 06 (14012) & TED 06 TED 06
(14013) to WC again from a period of (14012).
30 days.
The
It was also decided to drop the document is
Document TED 06 (14070). attached as
Annexure – 6
for reference
The document TED 06 (14070) has with editorial
been dropped. The committee may changes
please note. highlighted in
Blue text.
Document TED 06 (14012) has been
sent for WC on 13/08/2021.
Comments have been received from The
Mr. Faustino V and the same is committee
attached as Annexure V. may decide
to send the
The committee may deliberate and document for
decide. printing.

Document TED 06 (14013) Will be


sent for WC Shortly. The committee
may please note.

Decision in 31st Meeting:


The committee noted the status of
Doc TED 06 (14070) & TED 06
(14013).

The committee decided to give one


month more time to members for
giving comments on document TED
06 (14012).

If no comments are received, the


document can be sent for printing with
Chairman, TED 06 Approval.
If Comments are received, they can
be discussed in the next SC TED 06
Meeting.

11. ARAI Comments on IS 14681 (First Comments have been received on IS Two panel
Revision) : 2021 14681 (First Revision) : 2021, from meetings
Mr. Vishal Rawal, ARAI. The have been
Comments are attached as Annexure conducted by
– IX. The Committee may discuss and Mr.
decide. Khairatkar,
ARAI on 9th &
Decision in 31st Meeting: 20th
The Committee discussed the December
comments received, and asked Mr. 2021.
Khairatkar, ARAI, to conduct a
separate panel meeting for discussion The minutes
get back in the next SC TED 06 of both the
Meeting. meetings
have been
circulated via
email dt.
20/12/2021.

The
committee
may discuss
and
deliberate.

ITEM 4 TECHNICAL WORK PROGRAMME OF THE COMMITTEE

4.1 As per the statutory requirement of the Bureau, every standard should be reviewed by the
Sectional Committee responsible not more than five years after publication, reaffirmation or
revision to establish whether it is still current. Circumstances may lead to any earlier review,
too.

When reviewing a standard, a committee has five options available:

a) reaffirmation indicating continuing current of the standard without change;


b) amendment and reaffirmation indicating the continuing currently of standard
after necessary changes to bring it up to date;
c) revision involving the routine procedure for new project and reaffirm for time
being;
d) declaration of obsolescence indicating by amendment that the standard is
not recommended for use in new equipment but needs to be retained to provide
for the servicing of existing equipment that is expected to have a long working
life;
e) Withdrawal indicating that the standard is no longer needed.

4.2 As on-going activity, as indicated at 4.1 above, Sectional Committee reviews the Indian
Standards formulated by it at an interval of five years from the date of publication/last review.
Following standard were falling due for review during 2021-22 and were allocated to
Committee members in the 30th Meeting of SC. The Committee members were requested to
send their Inputs in the BIS Prescribed Pro forma (Attached as Annexure –7 ). The Progress
on the work allocated is given in the following table:

Sr. IS Title Responsibility Status


No. Number for Review
Assigned to
1 IS 7001 : Springs – Shot peening – Mr. Uday Inputs are Awaited.
2017 General procedures Harite (Will
(Second Revision) suggest the
Expert)
2 IS 10331 Specification for fuel tap Mr. Feroz Khan The Review
: 1982 for mopeds document has
been received from
Hero Motocorp
and the same is
attached as
Annexure - 8.
3 IS 13943 Automotive vehicles – Mr. Vishal In last meeting it
: 2017 Wheel guards for vehicles Rawal ARAI was decided by
the committee to
of m1 category –
ReAffirm the
Performance (First standard.
Revision)
The standard is
ReAffirmed.
4 IS 9238 : Lateral spacing of foot Ms. Pushpanjali Status in 31st
1979 controls for passenger cars Pathak (M&M) Meeting : It has
been
recommended by
Mr. Shakthivelan S.
via email dt. Sept.
5, 2021 to
withdraw the IS
9238 : 1979 as the
standard has been
superseded by IS-
16604:2017( with
Amd-1, 2021).

The inputs are


awaited in the BIS
Recommended
Format (Attached
as Annexure - VII)
for further process
of review through
BIS Portal.

The committee
requested M&M to
provide their
comments in the
BIS Prescribed
format within one
month time.

Once received, it
will be circulated
with all the
members and in
the next SC
Meeting, The
decision on this
document will be
taken.

Status in 32nd
Meeting : The
Review document
has been received
from Mr.
shaktivelan and the
same is attached
as Annexure – 9.

5 IS 10791 Specification for control Mrs. Richa In the last meeting


: 1983 cable assembly for mopeds Naik, AML- of SC TED 06, It
ARAI was decided to
ReAffirm this
standard.

The standard has


been reaffirmed.
6 IS 11028 Specification for handle Mr. Arvind Status in 31st
: 1984 bars for mopeds Kumbhar (Bajaj Meeting : The
Auto) Review documents
7 IS 11030 Specification for moped Mr. Arvind have been received
: 1984 seat pillars Kumbhar (Bajaj from Mr. Arvind
Auto) Kumbhar and are
8 IS 11140 Specification for footrest Mr. Arvind attached as
: 1984 assembly for mopeds Kumbhar (Bajaj Annexure – VI.
Auto)
The
Recommendations
are :
1. IS 11028:1984
: It is
recommended
to withdraw
IS
11028:1984.
2. IS 11030:1984
: It is
recommended
to withdraw
IS
11030:1984.
3. IS 11040: 1984
: It is
recommended
to withdraw
IS
11040:1984.

Also TED 6 to
take up
conversion of
AIS 148:2020
to new Indian
Standard

Decision in 31st
Meeting :

The committee
decided to
Circulate Review
document received
on IS 11028 & IS
11030 to all the
members and the
final decision can
be taken in the
next SC Meeting.
The committee
also requested Mr.
Vishwanathan
from Bajaj Motors
to prepare a
preliminary draft to
revise the standard
IS 11140 and align
it with latest AIS.

Status in 32nd
Meeting :

The document on
IS 11140 from Mr.
Vishwanathan is
awaited.

The committee
may decide upon
the documents IS
11028 & IS 11030.
Both review
documents have
are also being
attached as
Annexure – 10 for
Reference.

9 IS 14413 Automotive vehicles – Mr. Vishal Decision in 31st


: 1996 Telltale symbols and Rawal ARAI Meeting :
controls on two – Wheeled The Review
and three wheeled vehicles document was
received from Mr.
Vishal Rawal.

The Committee
requested Mr.
Betgiri and Mr.
Vishal rawal to
work on the draft
document for
Revision of IS
14413 and align it
with AIS 126.

The Inputs on
progress on this
document is
awaited.
10 IS 15061 Automotive vehicles – Ms. Vijayanta The review
: 2002 Flammability requirements Ahuja (ICAT) document has
been received from
Ms. Vijayanta ,
ICAT and the same
is attached as
Annexure - 11
11 IS/ISO Springs – Vocabulary Mr. Uday
26909 : Harite (Will
2009 suggest the
Expert)
12 IS/ISO Springs – Symbols Mr. Uday
16249 : Harite (Will
2013 suggest the
Expert)
13 IS 15943 Automotive vehicles – Mr. P. D. The Review
: 2012 Hand – Holds for three, Betgeri, Dy. document had
been received
four and more than four Director, ARAI
from Mr. Vishal
wheeled motor vehicles – Rawal.
Specification
In the last meeting
it was decided to
reaffirm this
standard.

The standard
would be
reaffirmed shortly
on the BIS Portal.
14 IS/ISO Technical product Mr. Uday
2162 : documentation – Springs: Harite (Will
Part 2 : Part 2 presentation of data suggest the
1993 for cylindrical helical Expert)
compression springs
15 IS 16332 Automotive vehicles – Mr. V G Status in 31st
: 2017 Strength of superstructure Kulkarni Meeting : It has
of large passenger vehicles been
recommended by
Mr. V G Kulkarni
via email dt. Sept.
8, 2021, to align IS
16332 : 2017 with
latest amendment
to AIS-031.

A Comparision
Matrix has been
prepared by Mr.
Kulkarni and the
same is attached
as Annexure – VIII.

The inputs are


awaited in the BIS
Recommended
Format (Attached
as Annexure - VII)
for further process
of review through
BIS Portal.

Decision in 31st
Meeting :
The committee
requested Mr.
Faustino to
prepare the draft
document based
on latest AIS
Standards to
revise IS 16332.

Mr. Faustino
promised to get
back with
preliminary draft
within two Month’s
time.

The committee
Authorized the
Member secretary
to send the
document for
Preliminary
Circulation once it
is received from
Mr. Faustino.
Status in 32nd
Meeting : The
document has
been received from
Mr. Faustino and
will be circulated
as P Draft Shortly.

The committee
may please note.
16 IS 16604 Automotive vehicles – Mr. V G Status in 31st
: 2017 Arrangement of foot Kulkarni Meeting : It has
controls of vehicles – been
Specification recommended by
Mr. V G Kulkarni
not to review IS
16332 as of now as
the document was
recently reviewed.

Decision in 31st
Meeting :
The chairman
promised to
discuss the
document with Mr.
V G Kulkarni and
get back with
Review document
in the next
meeting.

Status in 32nd
Meeting : The
Response is
awaited

ITEM 5 INTERNATIONAL ACTIVITIES

BIS membership of ISO/TC 22 is indicated below:

ISO Subcommittee Title Membership Status

ISO TC 22/SC 35 Lighting and Visibility ‘P’


ISO TC 22/SC 40 Specific aspects for light and heavy
commercial vehicles , buses & trailers ‘O’

ISO/TC 227 Springs ‘P’

India is a ‘Participating’ member on various documents generated by these Sub-committees.


Being ‘P’ member it is obligatory for India to vote on all the documents. The documents are
received from ISO Secretariat time to time are being circulated to members for comments.
Accordingly, voting is being done. Committee may also review the membership status of ISO
committees and may consider upgrading the status from ‘O’ to ‘P’ membership as indicated
above.

The committee may please note and review the status.

ITEM 6 DATE AND PLACE FOR THE NEXT MEETING

ITEM 7 ANY OTHER BUSINESS

One new proposal has been received from Hero Motocorp to start working on Amendment 5
to IS 14272. Draft amendment has also been received from Hero Motocorp and the same is
attached as Annexure -12 for the reference of the members.

The committee may deliberate and decide.


ANNEXURE-I
(Item 2.3)

COMPOSITION OF AUTOMOTIVE BODY, CHASSIS, ACCESSORIES, SPRINGS AND


SUSPENSION SYSTEMS SECTIONAL COMMITTEE, TED-6

29th Meeting 19-10-2020 Webex


30th Meeting 21-06-2021 Webex
31st Meeting 22-09-2021 Webex

Sl. Name of the Name of Representative Attendance


No. Organization Principal(Alternative) 29th 30th 31st Total
{Young Professional} Meeting Meeting Meeting
1. Automotive Research SHRI SREENIVASULU Y Y Y 3/3
Association of India (CHAIRMAN)
(ARAI), Pune SHRI A AKBAR BADUSHA (P)
SHRI B S YAMGAR (A)

2. Asahi India Glass Ltd, SHRI DEVEN KUMAR JALLY (P) Y Y Y 3/3
Rewari SHRI PANNEERSELVAM
ARUMUGAM (A)

3. Ashok Leyland Ltd, SHRI FAUSTINO V (P) Y Y Y 3/3


Chennai SHRI PRASANNA VENKATESH
(A)
4. Association of State N Y N 1/3
Road Transport R. CHANDRABABU
Undertaking, New ULLAS BABU (Alternate)
Delhi
5. Automotive SHRI UDAY HARITE (P) Y Y Y 3/3
Component
Manufacturers
Association (ACMA),
New Delhi
6. Bajaj Auto Ltd, Pune SHRI R. NARASIMHAN (P) Y Y Y 3/3
SHRI A.V. KUMBHAR (A)

7. BEML Limited, SHRI S. SUTHAKAR (P) - - N 0/1


Bengaluru SHRI H. D.
SATYANARAYANA(A)
SHRI ASHWINI KUMAR M. (YP)
8. Central Institute of SHRI N. R. TIWARI (P) Y N Y 2/3
Road Transport SHRI S. N. Dhole (A)
(CIRT), Pune
9. Central Farm Y N N 1/3
Machinery Training & SHRI P. K. PANDEY (P)
Testing Institute
(CFMTTI), Budni SHRI C. V. CHIMOTE (A)
10. Daimler India SHRI P DYANESWARAN (P) - - Y 1/1
Commercial Vehicles SHRI RAMA MANIKANDAN (A)
Private Limited,
Chennai
11. Directorate General of COL. P.K. SHRIVASTAV (P) 0 N N 0/2
Quality Assurance LT COL NIRANJAN OAK (A)
(DGQA), Ministry of
Defence,
New Delhi
12. Force Motors Ltd, Pune SHRI P. R. SHIVARAMAN (P) - - N 0/1
SHRI L.B. PATIL (A)

13. Hero Motocorp Ltd, SHRI FEROZ ALI KHAN (P) Y Y Y 3/3
Jaipur SHRI PIYUSH CHOWDHRY
(A)
MOHD. DANISH GAZALI
(YP)

14. Honda Cars India R&D SHRI S. MUTHUKUMAR (P) N Y Y 2/3


Limited, Noida
GAGAN MANRAL (A)

15. Honda Motorcycle and NOMINATION AWAITED - - Y 1/1


scooter India Pvt. Ltd.
Gurugram SHRI SANDEEP MISKEEN (P)
SHRI VIPIN SHARMA (A)

16. International Centre of SHRI ASHISH KUMAR (P) Y Y Y 3/3


Automotive SMT VIJAYANTA AHUJA (A)
Technology (ICAT),
Manesar
17. Jamna Auto Industries SHRI SUNIL LAROIYA (P) Y N Y 2/3
Ltd, SHRI ANUJ SHARMA (A)
New Delhi
18. Maharashtra State SHRI. R M PAUNIKAR (P) N N N 0/3
Road Transport
Corporation (MSRTC)
, Mumbai
19. Mahindra & Mahindra SHRI PRAVEEN BANSODE (P) Y Y Y 3/3
Ltd, Nashik SHRI T.VISWANATHAN (A)

20. Mahindra Trucks and SHRI K. NAGARAJU (P) Y Y Y 3/3


Bus Division, Pune SHRI V G KULKARNI (A)

21. Maruti Suzuki India SHRI SANDEEP RAINA (P) Y Y Y 3/3


Ltd, Gurgram SHRI GURURAJ RAVI (A)

22. Ministry of Heavy SHRI B.N. DAS (P) N N N 0/3


Industries & Public SHRI R.K. JAISWAL (A)
Enterprises, New Delhi
23. Ministry of Road SHRI DHARKAT R LUIKANG N N N 0/3
Transport & Highways (P)
(MoRTH), New Delhi
24. Ministry of Micro N N N 0/3
Small and Medium SHRI SUDHIR SINGH YADAV (P)
Enterprises (MSME), SHRI S.V. SHARMA (A)
New Delhi
25. Ordnance Factory SHRI P. K. ARORA (P) N N N 0/3
Board, Vehicle SHRI A.K. MAURYA (A)
Factory, Jabalpur
26. Renault Nissan Tech SHRI RAJENDRA KHILE (P) Y Y Y 3/3
and Business Center, SHRI S VIVEKRAJ (A)
Chennai
27. SDR Auto Private SHRI B. RAMESH (P) - - Y 1/1
Limited, Chennai
28. Saint-Gobain India SHRI KISHORE KUMAR V (P) Y N Y 2/3
Private Business
Center, Chennai
29. Skoda Auto SHRI MAKARAND BRAHME (P) - - Y 1/1
Volkswagen India SHRI MILIND JAGATP (A)
Private Limited SMT. ADITI DESHPANDE (A)
30. Society of Indian SHRI P.K. BANERJEE (P) Y Y Y 3/3
Automobile SHRI AMIT KUMAR (A)
Manufactures (SIAM),
New Delhi
31. Tata Motors Ltd , Pune SHRI GOWRISHANKAR P.S. (P) Y Y Y 3/3
SHRI SHARAD SHANKAR
BHOLE (A)

32. Toyota Kirloskar SHRI RAJU. M (P) Y Y Y 3/3


Motors Pvt. Ltd, Bidadi SHRI VIJETH R. GATTY (A)

33. Vehicles Research & SHRI S. MUTHUKRISHNAN (P) N N N 0/3


Development SHRI SAM SHAIKH (A)
Establishment (VRDE),
Ahmednagar
34. Volvo Group India Pvt SHRI PRAMOD KUMAR HUGAR Y Y N 2/3
Ltd, Bengaluru (A)
Annexure – 2

DRAFT AMENDMENT NO. 4


TO
IS 2553(Part 2): 2019 Safety Glass - Specification - Part 2 for Road Transport (First
Revision)

1. (Page 3, after clause 3.23.2) — Insert the following clause & figure:
3.24. Smallest Angle: The smallest angle among any adjacent sides of any pane refer figure .

2. (Page 4, Table 1, ) —In the row of 227 g ball test for laminated glass (XI), substitute the existing clause
number Cl. 5.5.1.2 with the new clause number 5.5.2.1. (Refer Amendment No. 2)
3. (Page 5, Table 1A, ) —In the row of 227 g ball test for laminated glass (XI), substitute the existing clause
number Cl. 5.5.1.2 with the new clause number 5.5.2.1. (Refer Amendment No. 2)
4. (Page 6, Clause 5.4.2, in the table, in the first row third column) – Substitute the existing words & figure the
new word & figure “Maximum values of the separation of the primary and secondary images”.
5. (Page 9, Clause 5.8.2.3.2, refer Amendment No. 2) – Substitute the existing words & figure “50 m” with the
new word & figure “50 cm”.
6. (Page 6, Clause 5.4.3, refer amendment no. 2 also) substitute the following clause with existing clause.
5.4.3.2 Head-form test on flat test pieces
When tested in accordance with 6.5, at the drop height of 4.0 m + 15 – 0 mm, the flat test piece shall
meet the following requirements.

7. (Page 3, after clause 6.6.1.5.4) — Insert the following clause:


6.6.1.6. Alternate test method
6.6.1.6.1 Hazemeter, shown diagrammatically in Figure 5.1 and consisting of:
6.6.1.6.1.1 A light source of colour temperature 2,856K ± 50K and a photodetector, and the combination
shall be filtered to provide an output corresponding to the luminosity response of the 1931 CIE Standard
Colorimetric Observer with CIE Standard Illuminant A. The output shall be proportional to within 1% to
the incident flux over the range of flux used. The photometric stability for source and detector shall be
constant throughout the test of each test piece.
6.6.1.6.1.2 An integrating sphere to collect transmitted flux; the sphere may be of any diameter as long
as the total port areas do not exceed 4.0% of the internal reflecting area of the sphere. The entrance and
exit ports shall be centred on the same great circle of the sphere, and there shall be at least 2.97rad (170°)
of arc between centres. The exit port shall subtend an angle of 0.14rad (8°) at the centre of the entrance
port. With the light trap in position, without the test piece, the axis of the irradiating beam shall pass
through the centres of the entrance and exit ports. For a hazemeter, position the photocell or photocells
on the sphere 1.57rad ± 0.17rad (90° ± 10°) from the entrance port and baffle it from direct exposure to
the entrance port. In the pivotable modification where the interior wall adjacent to the exit port is used as
the reflectance reference, the angle of rotation of the sphere shall be 0.140rad ± 0.008rad (8.0° ± 0.5°).
6.6.1.6.1.3 Illuminate the test piece by a substantially unidirectional beam; the maximum angle that any
ray of this beam may make with the beam axis shall not exceed 0.05rad (3°). This beam shall not be
vignette at either port of the sphere.
When the test piece is placed against the entrance port of the integrating sphere, the angle between the
perpendicular to the test piece and a line connecting the centres of entrance and exit ports shall not exceed
0.14rad (8°).
An aperture or diaphragm shall be centrally inserted in the haze measuring apparatus to centre the light
beam on the abradant track and limit it to a diameter of 7mm ± 1mm at the test piece.
When the reduced light is unobstructed by a test piece, its cross section at the exit port shall be
approximately circular, sharply defined, uniformly bright, and concentric within the exit port, leaving an
annulus of 0.023rad ± 0.002rad (1.3° ± 0.1°) subtended at the entrance port.
The surfaces of the interior of the integrating sphere, baffles, and reflectance standard, if used, shall be
of equal reflectance, matte, and highly reflecting throughout the visible spectrum.
A light trap shall be provided that will absorb the beam completely when no test piece is present, or the
instrument design shall obviate the need for a light trap.
Forward scattering glass standards can be used to check that the optical system of the hazemeter is
properly adjusted.
6.6.1.6.1.4 Test Piece Holder
A suitable holder shall be used to permit positioning the test piece on the hazemeter so that the light beam
is centred in the abradant track and the test piece is flush at the measurement port. Calibrate the hazemeter
with the test piece holder before the initial measurement of the haze with no test piece present and verify
that the reading of the hazemeter is zero. The whole apparatus shall be checked at regular intervals by
means of calibration standards of defined haze. If haze measurements are made using equipment or
methods differing from the above, the results shall be corrected in order to be in agreement with those
obtained by the apparatus described above.

FIG. 5.1
8. (Page 39, Fig. 32) — Substitute the following figure for the existing figure:
9. (Page 45, after clause 6.6.1.5.4) — substitute the following table with existing table:
Sl. No. Parameters Whether Verification is required
1 Change in type of Glazing All Tests.
2 Change in Interlayer Type / Material / Thickness All Tests
3 Change in Nominal Thickness of Windscreen and All Tests.
Panes.
4 Change in Rake Angle in case of windscreen Optical Distortion, Secondary Image separation and
Light Transmission tests.
5 Change in location of the ‘R’ / ‘H’ / ‘O’ point w.r.t In case the areas referred to in 5.4.1 and 5.4.2 are
windscreen as mounted on vehicle. reduced maintaining the overall boundaries same, no
tests are required.
In case the boundaries are shifted and / or area is
increased, optical distortion and secondary image
separation tests need to be carried out.
6 Change in test area in case the earlier approval is
based on Fig. 36 for Windscreen
6.1 Increase in Area In case the boundaries are shifted and / or area is
increased, optical distortion and secondary image
separation tests need to be carried out.
6.2 Decrease in Area If area is reduced maintaining the overall boundaries
same, no tests need to be carried out.
7 Change in Colour combination i.e. Cl + Cl or Cl + Light Transmission, Optical Distortion and Secondary
Green etc Image separation Test.
8 Changes in the toughened panes:
8.1 For flat toughened panes: Fragmentation Test
Developed area – Increase more than +5%
Smallest angle between two adjacent sides – Decrease
more than 5 degrees.
8.2 For curved toughened panes: Fragmentation Test
Developed area – Increase more than +5%
Smallest angle between two adjacent sides – Decrease
more than 5 degrees.
Segment height – Increase more than 30 mm
8.3 Change in colour for Toughened Panes Light Transmittance
9 Changes in Toughened Windscreen
9.1 Change in Rake Angle Optical Distortion, Secondary Image and Light
Transmission Tests
9.2 Change in Colour Optical Distortion, Secondary Image and Light
Transmission Tests
9.3 Developed area – Increase more than +5% Fragmentation Test
Smallest angle between two adjacent sides – Decrease
more than 5 degrees.
Segment height – Increase more than 30 mm
Annexure – 3

TED 06 (17826)

DRAFT AMENDMENT NO.1


TO
IS 13942 (PART 2):2020
AUTOMOTIVE VEHICLES – EXTERNAL PROJECTIONS
PART 2- PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR VEHICLES OF
CATEGORIES OTHER THAN M1
(Page 1, clause 1.1) – Substitute following for the existing clause:

1.1. This standard applies to the external projection of vehicles of categories M2, M3, N1,
N2, N3, L7 and L5 with engine capacity exceeding 500cc, limited to the “external surface” as
defined below. It does not apply to the exterior rear view mirrors, including their support, or to
the accessories, such as aerials and luggage racks etc., if fitted.
(Page 1, clause 1.1)-Add following new clauses after the clause:

1.1.1. Vehicles of Category N1 and M2 derived from M1, which complies with the
requirement of IS 13942 (Part 1):2019 shall be deemed to comply with the requirements
of this standard.

1.1.2. This standard does not apply to two wheeled vehicles.

(Page 1, clause 4.1) – Substitute following for the existing clause:

4.1 The provisions of this standard shall not apply to those parts of the external surface of
the vehicle which, with the vehicle in the unladen condition, with doors, windows and access
lids, etc, in the closed position, are either:
1) at height of more than 2 m; or
2) below the floor line; or
3) so located that, in static conditions, they cannot be contacted by a sphere 100 mm in diameter.

(Page 2, clause 4.4) – Substitute following for the existing clause:

4.4 Projecting parts of the external surface, having hardness not more than 60 Shore A, may
have a radius of curvature lower than the values prescribed under paras 5 to 16 below.

(Page 2, clause 5.1) – Substitute following for the existing clause:

5.1 Ornaments, commercial symbols, letters and numbers, of commercial markings which
project more than 10 mm from the surrounding surface shall retract, become detached or bend
over under a force of 10 daN exerted at their most salient point in any direction in a plane
approximately parallel to the surface on which they are mounted.

(Page 2, clause 8.2) – Substitute following for the existing clause:

8.2 Requirement for radius of curvature shall not apply to the wiper blades or to any
supporting members. However, these units shall be so made as to have no sharp angles or
pointed or cutting parts of a non-functional nature.

(TED 06)
Annexure - 4
Comments Received on TED 06 (17822)

A. Basic Details
5. Doc No. / IS :
1. Name : Ms Vijayanta Ahuja TED/6/17822
2. Email ID : 6. Technical
vijayanta.ahuja@icat.in Commitee : TED6
7. Member
Secretary :
3. Contact No. : 9871228855 Gaurav Jayaswal
4. Organisation Details : N/A

B. Comment Detail & Action Logs

Paragraph
Clause / Type of
SNo. No./Figure Attachment
Subclause No. Comment
No./Table No.
1 3 ANNEX B Editorial N/A
Increase in angle θ beyond the
Comments/Suggestions along with Justification for the Proposed
values specified by manufacturer
Change
in 7.1.1
Increase in angle θ beyond the
Proposed Change/Modified Wordings values specified by manufacturer
in 5.1.1
TED 06 (17822) after Editorial Change
Draft AMENDMENT NO.1
TO
IS 16712:2018
AUTOMOTIVE VEHICLES — SPRAY SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS FOR TWO
WHEELED MOTOR VEHICLES

(Page 1, clause 1.1)-Substitute the following for clause:

‘1.1 This standard applies to two wheeled motor vehicles of L2 category as defined in IS
14272 except:
a) those fitted with thermic engine of capacity exceeding 200 cm3;
b) battery operated vehicles having maximum continuous rated Power exceeding 11 kW;
and
c) L1 category vehicles not exceeding maximum speed of 45 km/h. ’
(Page 3, Annex B)-Substitute the following for the existing:
‘ANNEX B
(Clause 6.2.5)
CRITERIA FOR EXTENSION OF APPROVAL

Sl No. Parameter/Criteria Whether verification


required
1 a) Reduction of engine capacity from beyond 200cm³ to less than
and equal to200cm³;
b) In case of battery operated vehicles reduction of maximum
Yes
continuous rated powerfrom beyond 11 kW to less than 11 kW; and
c)In case of L1 category vehicles, increase in maximum speed above
45 km/h.
2 a) Increase of engine capacity from less than 200 cm³ to more than
200 cm³;
b ) In case of battery operated vehicles increase of maximum
continuous rated power from less than 11 kW to more than No
11kW;and
c)In case of L1 category vehicles, decrease in maximum speed below
45 km/h.
3 Increase in angle θ beyond the values specified by manufacturer in No
.1.1.
4 Increase in Tyre Overall Width Yes
5 Decrease in Tyre Overall Width No
6 Decrease in width of Spray suppression system Yes
7 Increase in width of Spray suppression system No

(TED 06)
Annexure - 5
Doc. No. ─ TED 6 (18171) W

TITLE: AUTOMOTIVE VEHICLES - METHOD OF TEST FOR ARTICULATION (FIRST REVISION)


AMENDMENT - 1

NAME OF THE COMMENTATOR: Muniyandi P


NAME OF THE /ORGANIZATION: {Directorate General of Quality Assurance (DGQA)}

Sl. No. Clause/ Type of Comments/Suggestions Proposed Change


Sub-clause/ Comments along with Justification for
Para/Table/Fig. (General the Proposed Change
No. commented /Editorial/
Technical)
As per existing instructions, For 2 Axle Vehicles — It is the
(1) Clause / Sub- Editorial the criteria is ‘suspension is maximum height to which the
clause No. ─ 2.1 compressed to the maximum diagonally opposite wheels to
limit allowed by the stoppers, be raised till one of the
Paragraph No. if provided’. However, in the remaining wheels starts lifting
/Figure No. proposed amendment, it states up or the suspension is
/Table No. ─ ‘suspension is compressed to compressed to the maximum
2.1.1 the maximum limit allowed limit allowed with touching /
with touching / compression compression by the stoppers, if
by the stoppers, if provided, provided, upto the specified
upto the specified limits of limits of suspension
suspension compression’. The compression. To determine the
criteria of specified limits of conformance to the
compression by the stoppers requirement, the manufacturer
has to be defined as one of the should provide the details of
parameter in the formats of limits of compression of the
AIS-007, so as to refer to it Stoppers (if fitted). Indication
while undertaking trial of conformance and non-
evaluation of vehicles, conformance is mentioned in
especially the vehicles that are the illustrative sketched below.
manufactured exclusively for
the Indian Armed Forces. In
addition, it is recommended
that illustration in the form of
sketch for cases conforming
and non-conforming to the
amended criteria be included
after the clause.
As per existing instructions, For Vehicles with More than 2
(2) Clause / Sub- the criteria is ‘suspension is Axles — It is the maximum
clause No. ─ 2.1 Editorial compressed to the maximum height to which the farthest and
limit allowed by the stoppers, innermost diagonally opposite
Paragraph No. if provided’. However, in the wheels to be raised till one of
/Figure No. proposed amendment, it states the remaining wheels starts
/Table No. ─ ‘suspension is compressed to lifting up or the suspension is
2.1.2 the maximum limit allowed compressed to the maximum
with touching / compression limit allowed with touching /
by the stoppers, if provided, compression by the stoppers, if
upto the specified limits of provided, upto the specified
suspension compression’. The limits of suspension
criteria of specified limits of compression. To determine the
compression by the stoppers conformance to the
has to be defined as one of the requirement, the manufacturer
parameter in the formats of should provide the details of
AIS-007, so as to refer to it limits of compression of the
Sl. No. Clause/ Type of Comments/Suggestions Proposed Change
Sub-clause/ Comments along with Justification for
Para/Table/Fig. (General the Proposed Change
No. commented /Editorial/
Technical)
while undertaking trial Stoppers (if fitted). Indication
evaluation of vehicles, of conformance and non-
especially the vehicles that are conformance is mentioned in
manufactured exclusively for the illustrative sketched below
the Indian Armed Forces. In for 3-Axle, 4-Axle and 5-Axle
addition, after the clause, it is configuration.
recommended that illustration
in the form of sketch for cases
conforming and non-
conforming to the amended
criteria be included. The
illustration is recommended to
be provided for 3-Axle, 4-Axle
and 5-Axle configuration.
Annexure – 6

भारतीय मानक प्रारूप


ड्राइव-अवे-चेसिि कॉसफ़िगरेशन/वाहनों के सिए अस्थायी के सिन की आवश्यकताएं

Draft Indian Standard


REQUIREMENTS OF TEMPORARY CABIN FOR
DRIVE-AWAY-CHASSIS CONFIGURATION/ VEHICLES
Automotive Body, Chassis, Accessories, springs and Suspension Systems Sectional
Committee, TED 6

FOREWORD
This draft Indian Standard shall be adopted by Bureau of Indian Standards, after the draft
finalized by the Automotive Body, Chassis, Accessories, springs and Suspension Systems
Sectional Committee is approved by the Transport Engineering Division Council.
This Indian Standard has been formulated to lay down the guidelines for fitment of temporary
cabin for transportation of drive-away-chassis configuration of vehicles from premises of
original equipment manufacturers to premises of body builders, in accordance with the rulings
of human rights commission for protection of drivers of such drive-away-chassis vehicles from
inclement weather and climatic conditions.
Formulation of this Indian Standard has been undertaken to harmonize it with AIS 070. In the
formulation of this standard, assistance has been derived from:
AIS 070 Requirements of Temporary Cabin for Drive-Away-Chassis Configuration
Vehicles

In case of any variance between the standard and Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989, latter
shall prevail.
For the purpose of deciding whether a particular requirement of this standard is complied with
,the final value, observed or calculated, expressing the result of test or analysis, shall be rounded
off in accordance with IS 2 : 1960 ‘Rules for rounding off numerical values (revised )’..The
number of significant places retained in the rounded off value should be the same as that of the
specified value in this standard.
Draft Indian Standard
REQUIREMENTS OF TEMPORARY CABIN FOR DRIVE-AWAY-
CHASSIS CONFIGURATION/ VEHICLES

1 SCOPE

This standard applies to all vehicles of M and N category, which leave the factory premises for
body building in a drive-away-chassis configuration, on road, whenever and wherever, by its own
wheels using own power.
This standard does not apply to drive away chassis that are transported from the factory premises
for body building, on a trailer or any other mode of transportation.

2 DIMENSIONS OF TEMPORARY CABIN

The dimensions of the temporary cabin shall be as follows:

(a) Width : 650 mm, minimum


(b) Height : 900 mm, minimum

(from seat top surface)


(c) Depth : Depth of temporary Cabin shall be
such that there is a 50 mm clearance
(Length) from the rear most back rest when the
seat is taken at the rear-most position

3 WINDSHIELD

Front windshield shall be a transparent element like glass or acrylic will suffice. Front
windshield shall have adequate visibility.

4 CANOPY

A soft top covering shall be provided to protect the driver from sun and rain. The temporary
cabin super structure shall be mounted on the drive-away-chassis at minimum four points
and the soft top canopy shall be anchored at minimum eight points on the super structure,
so that soft top is not loose. Appropriate collar / projection (of minimum 100 mm) shall be
provided to avoid rain water from entering the cabin.

5 SEATS & SEAT BELT


Original seat shall be provided with vehicle chassis, which shall be a permanent seat
affixed on the vehicle.

6 REAR VIEW MIRROR

A simple rear view mirror shall be provided for the driver to have view at the rear.
REVIEW ANALYSIS OF INDIAN STANDARD
(To be submitted to the Sectional Committee)

1. Sectional Committee No. & Title:

2. IS No:

3. Title in English:

4. Title in Hindi:

5. ICS No.

6. Date of review:

7. Review Analysis

i) Amendment to be incorporated, if any:

ii) Status of standard(s), if any from which assistance had been drawn in the
formulation of this IS.

Standard Whether the Major changes Action proposed


(No. & Title) standard has
since been
revised

iii) Status of standards referred in the IS

Referred IS No. of this Changes that are of Action proposed


standards standards since affecting the
(No. & Title) revised standard under
review
iv) Any other standards available related to the subject & scope of the standard
being reviewed (International/regional/other national/association/consortia, etc
or of new or revision of existing Indian Standard)

Standard Provisions that could be Action proposed


(No. & Title) relevant while reviewing the
IS

v) Technical comments on the standard received, if any

Source Clause of IS Comment Action proposed

vi) Information available on technical developments that have taken place (on
product/processes/practices/use or application/testing/input materials, etc)

Source Development Relevant clause of Action proposed


the IS under review
that is likely to be
impacted
(Clause & IS No.)

vii) Issues arising out of changes in any related IS or due to formulation of new
Indian Standard

Related IS Provision in the Changes that may Action proposed


and its Title IS under review be necessary in the
(revised or that would be Standards under
new) impacted & the review
clause no. or
addition of new
clause/provision

viii) Any consequential changes to be considered in other IS


Related IS to Requirements to be impacted
get impacted

8. Any other observation:

9. Recommendations:
Annexure – 8

REVIEW ANALYSIS OF INDIAN STANDARD by Hero MotoCorp Ltd.


(To be submitted to the Sectional Committee)

1. Sectional Committee No. & Title: Automotive Body, Chassis, Accessories, Springs and Suspension Systems
Sectional Committee, TED 6

2. IS No: IS 10331 : 1982

3. Title in English: Specification for fuel tap for mopeds

4. Title in Hindi:

5. ICS No. : UDC 629.118.35.056.36

6. Date of review: 23rd Nov 2021

7. Review Analysis

ix) Amendment to be incorporated, if any: NA

x) Status of standard(s), if any from which assistance had been drawn in the formulation of this IS.

Standard Whether the standard Major changes Action proposed


(No. & Title) has since been revised
NA

xi) Status of standards referred in the IS

Referred standards IS No. of this standards since Changes that are Action proposed
(No. & Title) revised of affecting the
standard under
review
1. IS 738: 1977 ‘Wrought Third revision is IS 738: 1994 - NA
aluminium and aluminium alloy and got further re-affirmed in
drawn tube for general 2020
engineering purposes (second
revision)’
2. IS 407 : 1981 ‘Brass tubes for Last re- affirmed in 2021 NA
general purposes (Second -
revision)’
3. IS 3169 : 1965 ‘Two stage,  Revised in 1991and got - NA
one litre fuel filters for diesel last re-affirmed in 2020.
engines’
 The version of 1965 is not
available
4. IS 737 : 1974 ‘Wrought Revised in 2008 and got last re- Tests, markings, NA
aluminium and aluminium affirmed in 2018. Dimensions and
alloys, sheet and strip for tolerances,
general engineering purposes ( selection of test
second revision)’ samples.

Referred standards IS No. of this standards since Changes that are Action proposed
(No. & Title) revised of affecting the
standard under
review
5. IS 3965 :1969 ‘Dimensions  Revised in 1981 and got - NA
for wrought aluminium last re-affirmed in 2017.
and aluminium alloys, bar, rod  The version of 1969 is not
and section’ available.
6. IS 742: 1981 ‘Zinc base alloy last re-affirmed in 2019 No changes NA
die castings
(second revision)’

7. IS 4454 (Part III): I975 ‘Steel  This standard has been


wires for cold formed springs : superseded by IS 4454
Part III Oil hardened and (Part II) Steel Wires for
tempered steel wires - alloyed Mechanical Springs - Part II - NA
(first revision)’ : Oil Hardened and
Tempered Spring Steel
Wire and Valve Spring
Wire – Unalloyed
 The IS 4454 (Part II)
Revised in 2001 and got
last re-affirmed in 2015
8. IS 5188: 1969 ‘Cold This standard is withdrawn. - NA
polymerized oil – extended raw
styrene - butadiene rubber’
9. IS 9766 : 1981 ‘Flexible PVC Revised in 1992 and got last re- - NA
compounds’ affirmed in 2018

xii) Any other standards available related to the subject & scope of the standard being reviewed
(International/regional/other national/association/consortia, etc or of new or revision of existing
Indian Standard)

Standard Provisions that could be relevant Action proposed


(No. & Title) while reviewing the IS
NA

xiii) Technical comments on the standard received, if any

Source Clause of IS Comment Action proposed


NA

xiv) Information available on technical developments that have taken place (on
product/processes/practices/use or application/testing/input materials, etc)

Source Development Relevant clause of the IS Action proposed


under review that is
likely to be impacted
(Clause & IS No.)
NA

xv) Issues arising out of changes in any related IS or due to formulation of new Indian Standard

Related IS and Provision in the IS Changes that may be Action proposed


its Title under review that necessary in the
(revised or new) would be impacted Standards under review
& the clause no. or
addition of new
clause/provision
NA

xvi) Any consequential changes to be considered in other IS

Related IS to get Requirements to be impacted


impacted
NA

8. Any other observation: No

9. Recommendations: In 2012 and 2017, the standard was reaffirmed, respectively. Furthermore, no
amendment or revision to the standard has been issued; however, during the review, it was noticed that
several other standards referred to in this standard have been revised or superseded by another
standard; therefore, HMCL recommends that the committee may form a panel (under the convenorship
of ACMA) to revise the standard IS 10331:1982.

REVIEW ANALYSIS OF INDIAN STANDARD


(To be submitted to the Sectional Committee)

1. Sectional Committee No. & Title: TED 6, Automotive Body, Chassis, Accessories, Springs
and Suspension Systems Sectional Committee.

2. IS No: IS 9238: 1979


3. Title in English: Lateral spacing for foot controls for passenger cars.

4. Title in Hindi: ----

5. ICS No.: 43.040.30, Indicating & Control devices

6. Date of review: To be reviewed in 2022 (Reaffirmed-2017)

7. Review Analysis

xvii) Amendment to be incorporated, if any: NA

xviii) Status of standard(s), if any from which assistance had been drawn in the
formulation of this IS.

Standard Whether the standard has Major changes Action


(No. & Title) since been revised proposed
ISO 3409-1975 Revised & Re-affirmed in 2017 No changes NA

xix) Status of standards referred in the IS

Referred IS No. of this Changes that are of Action proposed


standards standards since affecting the
(No. & Title) revised standard under
review
NA No standard has been referred in IS-9238:1979

xx) Any other standards available related to the subject & scope of the standard
being reviewed (International/regional/other national/association/consortia, etc
or of new or revision of existing Indian Standard)

Standard Provisions that could be relevant Action proposed


(No. & Title) while reviewing the IS
ISO 3409-1975 NA, as IS-9238: 1979 standard is in Currently AIS-035: 2006 is
entire agreement with ISO 3409-1975 notified in CMVR.
UNR-35. Rev.1 A Clause.5 (Requirement) of UNR-035 can
amd-1 be relevant while reviewing the IS, as Also, In AISIS conversion
IS-19238:1979 gives only text for the Activity AIS-035 is converted to
measurements of the distances between IS-16604 and it is Published on
the pedals and does not provide any BIS Website.
limits for assessment unlike UNR-035.
AIS-035: 2006, Clause.5 (Requirement) of AIS-035 can IS-16604: 2017 standard is in entire
Amd-1 &2 be relevant while reviewing the IS, as agreement with AIS-035
IS-19238:1979 gives only text for the
measurements of the distances between IS-19238:1979 gives procedure /text
the pedals and does not provide any for the measurements of the
limits for assessment unlike AIS-035. distances between the pedals.
However, it does not provide any
IS-16604:2017, Clause.4 (Requirement) of IS-16604 can
limits/Values for assessment unlike
Amd-1 be relevant while reviewing the IS, as
AIS-035.
(Published) IS-19238:1979 gives only text for the
measurements of the distances between
AIS-035 & IS-16604 covers text
the pedals and does not provide any
of IS-9238:1979 & also provides
limits for assessment unlike AIS-035.
limits/values of the distances
between the pedal for
Also, it is mentioned in the Title
assessment.
page of IS-16604:2017, below
standard number that Superseding
Considering the above
IS 9238: 1979.
arguments, it is recommended
that this IS can be withdraw.

xxi) Technical comments on the standard received, if any

Source Clause of IS Comment Action proposed


NA NA NA NA

xxii) Information available on technical developments that have taken place (on
product/processes/practices/use or application/testing/input materials, etc)

Source Development Relevant clause of Action proposed


the IS under review
that is likely to be
impacted
(Clause & IS No.)
No Technical development in the IS-9238:1979

xxiii) Issues arising out of changes in any related IS or due to formulation of new
Indian Standard

Related IS Provision in the Changes that may Action proposed


and its Title IS under review be necessary in the
(revised or that would be Standards under
new) impacted & the review
clause no. or
addition of new
clause/provision
NA NA NA NA
xxiv) Any consequential changes to be considered in other IS

Related IS to Requirements to be impacted


get impacted
NA NA

8. Any other observation: NA

9. Recommendations:
It is Recommended that the standard IS 9238: 1979 can be Withdrawn, as the standard
has been superseded by IS-16604:2017, which has been amended in 2021, Automotive
Vehicles — Arrangement of Foot Controls of Vehicles — Specification. IS-16604:2017 was
adopted by BIS, after the draft finalized by the Automotive Body, Chassis, Accessories, Garage
Equipment, Springs and Suspension Systems Sectional Committee (TED-6) had been approved by
the Transport Engineering Division Council (TEDC). The standard has been derived from the AIS
035 ‘Automotive vehicles — The arrangement of foot controls of vehicles — Specification’ and
ECE R 35 (Revision 1, Erratum) ‘Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with
regard to the Arrangement of Foot Controls’.
Annexure - 10
REVIEW ANALYSIS OF IS 11028 : 1984
(To be submitted to the Sectional Committee)

10.Sectional Committee No. & Title: Automotive Body, Chassis, Accessories, Springs and
Suspension Systems Sectional Committee, TED 6

11. IS No: IS 11028 : 1984

12. Title in English: Specification for handle bars for mopeds

13. Title in Hindi: -

14. ICS No. UDC 629’118’35 - 514’5

15. Date of review: 10th September 2021

16. Review Analysis

xxv) Amendment to be incorporated, if any: NA

xxvi) Status of standard(s), if any from which assistance had been drawn in the
formulation of this IS.

Standard Whether the Major changes Action proposed


(No. & Title) standard has
since been
revised
No base reference standard mentioned for this standard

xxvii) Status of standards referred in the IS

Referred IS No. of this Changes that are of Action proposed


standards standards since affecting the
(No. & Title) revised standard under
review
The Indian standards IS: 5429-1979 (Dimensions of steel tubes), IS : 3074-1979
(Specification of steel tubes), IS : 1068-1968 (Specification for electroplated
coatings) are cross referred. These standards are completely revised

xxviii) Any other standards available related to the subject & scope of the standard
being reviewed (International/regional/other national/association/consortia, etc
or of new or revision of existing Indian Standard)
Standard Provisions that could be Action proposed
(No. & Title) relevant while reviewing the
IS
No such standard available.

xxix) Technical comments on the standard received, if any :

Source Clause of IS Comment Action proposed


No Comments received.

xxx) Information available on technical developments that have taken place (on
product/processes/practices/use or application/testing/input materials, etc)

Source Development Relevant clause of Action proposed


the IS under review
that is likely to be
impacted
(Clause & IS No.)
In the recent vehicles available under this category are having large variety of
vehicle styling including that of handle bar designs and is not restricted only to
the tubular type handle bars as mentioned in the standard.

xxxi) Issues arising out of changes in any related IS or due to formulation of new
Indian Standard

Related IS and its Provision in the Changes that Action


Title IS under review may be necessary proposed
(revised or new) that would be in the Standards
impacted & the under review
clause no. or
addition of new
clause/provision
--

xxxii) Any consequential changes to be considered in other IS :

Related IS to Requirements to be impacted


get impacted
Not Required

17. Any other observation: No

18. Recommendations:
 It is recommended to withdraw IS 11028:1984.
REVIEW ANALYSIS OF IS 11030 : 1984
(To be submitted to the Sectional Committee)

1. Sectional Committee No. & Title: Automotive Body, Chassis, Accessories, Springs and
Suspension Systems Sectional Committee, TED 6

2. IS No: IS 11030 : 1984

3. Title in English: Specification for moped seat pillars

4. Title in Hindi: -

5. ICS No. UDC 629~118~35*01~2 - 216’6

6. Date of review: 10th September 2021

7. Review Analysis

xxxiii) Amendment to be incorporated, if any: NA

xxxiv) Status of standard(s), if any from which assistance had been drawn in the
formulation of this IS.

Standard Whether the Major changes Action proposed


(No. & Title) standard has
since been
revised
No base reference standard mentioned for this standard

xxxv) Status of standards referred in the IS

Referred IS No. of this Changes that are of Action proposed


standards standards since affecting the
(No. & Title) revised standard under
review
The Indian standards IS : 5429-1979 (Dimensions of steel tubes), IS: 3074-1979
(Specification of steel tubes), IS: 1068-1968 (Specification for electroplated
coatings) and IS: 1573-1970 (Specification for electroplated coatings of zinc on
iron and steel) are cross referred. These standards are completely revised

xxxvi) Any other standards available related to the subject & scope of the standard
being reviewed (International/regional/other national/association/consortia, etc
or of new or revision of existing Indian Standard)
Standard Provisions that could be Action proposed
(No. & Title) relevant while reviewing the
IS
No such standard available.

xxxvii) Technical comments on the standard received, if any :

Source Clause of IS Comment Action proposed


No comments received.

xxxviii) Information available on technical developments that have taken place (on
product/processes/practices/use or application/testing/input materials, etc)

Source Development Relevant clause of Action proposed


the IS under review
that is likely to be
impacted
(Clause & IS No.)
The current moped vehicles does not have these type of pillars for mounting
seats. The seat design is mainly based on the vehicle styling and pillion/rider
comfort as the case may be.

xxxix) Issues arising out of changes in any related IS or due to formulation of new
Indian Standard

Related IS and its Provision in the Changes that Action


Title IS under review may be necessary proposed
(revised or new) that would be in the Standards
impacted & the under review
clause no. or
addition of new
clause/provision
-----

xl) Any consequential changes to be considered in other IS :


Related IS to Requirements to be impacted
get impacted
Not Required

8. Any other observation: No


9. Recommendations:
It is recommended to withdraw IS 11030:1984.
REVIEW ANALYSIS OF INDIAN STANDARD
(To be submitted to the Sectional Committee)

1. Sectional Committee No. & Title: Automotive Body, Chassis, Accessories, Springs and
Suspension Systems Sectional Committee, TED 6

2. IS No: IS 15061: 2017

3. Title in English: AUTOMOTIVE VEHICLES — FLAMMABILITY REQUIREMENTS

4. Title in Hindi:

5. ICS No.

6. Date of review: 21st September 2021

7. Review Analysis

i) Amendment to be incorporated, if any: Yes, with reference to ECE R 118

ii) Status of standard(s), if any from which assistance had been drawn in the formulation
of this IS.

Standard Whether the Major changes Action


(No. & Title) standard has proposed
since been
revised

DIRECTIVE 95/28/EC DIRECTIVE UN Regulation No IS 15061: 2017


95/28/EC has been 118 is applicable in To be revised as
REPEALED by place of DIRECTIVE per UN
REGULATION (EC) 95/28/EC for Burning Regulation No
No 661/2009 behaviour of materials 118

iii) Status of standards referred in the IS

Referred IS No. of this Changes that are of Action


standards standards since affecting the proposed
(No. & Title) revised standard under
review
EEC Directive 95/28/EC January 1996 — Burning behavior of internal
materials has been REPEALED by REGULATION (EC) No 661/2009

iv) Any other standards available related to the subject & scope of the standard being
reviewed (International/regional/other national/association/consortia, etc or of new
or revision of existing Indian Standard) \

Standard Provisions that could be Action proposed


(No. & Title) relevant while reviewing the
IS

ECE R 118 Uniform technical Revision of IS 15061: 2017 to


prescriptions concerning the be reviewed with respect to
burning behavior and/or the changes in ECE R 118
capability to repel fuel or
lubricant of materials used in
the construction of certain
categories of motor vehicle
v) Technical comments on the standard received, if any

Source Clause of IS Comment Action proposed

No.

vi) Information available on technical developments that have taken place (on
product/processes/practices/use or application/testing/input materials, etc.)

Source Development Relevant clause of the Action proposed


IS under review that is
likely to be impacted
(Clause & IS No.)

GRSG

vii) Issues arising out of changes in any related IS or due to formulation of new
Indian
Standard

Related IS Provision in the IS Changes that may be Action


and its under review that necessary in the proposed
Title would be impacted & Standards under
(revised or the clause no. or review
new) addition of new
clause/provision
Not presently.

viii) Any consequential changes to be considered in other IS

Related IS to get impacted Requirements to be impacted


No.

8. Any other observation: No

9. Recommendations: Revise the IS 15061: 2017 in line with latest ECE R 118.
DRAFT AMENDMENT NO.
5
T
O
IS 14272: 2011 - AUTOMOTIVE VEHICLES — TYPES —
TERMINOLOGY

[Page 4, clause 3.6.2 (see also amendment No. 1)] – insert the following after the clause:

“Definitions of type of frame for two wheeled motor vehicle of L1 & L2 category are given in Annex C.”

[After ANNEX B] – insert the following ANNEX C:

ANNEX C

(Clause 3.6.2)

DEFINITION OF TYPE OF FRAME FOR TWO WHEELED MOTOR VEHICLE (L1 & L2)
S NO. TERM DEFINITION DRAWING

(1) (2) (3) (4)

i) Step-through type frame For mounting the vehicle, the rider


can step through the low structure
and rider’s foot rests are mounted
on chassis/engine.

ii) Scooter type frame The rider can step through to mount the
vehicle having platform/floorboard,
and foot rests for the rider are integral
with platform/footboard.

iii) Step over type frame The rider has to step over the vehicle
to mount.

You might also like