Operating Risk assessme

Volume&Composition
MDEA
PROVISION AND USE OF
Plan A
THE NEW AMINE
HEP
Amine from ISG "400 M3"
MDEA 40.29%
TEG 6.85%
Pz 1.47%
OASE Purple "68.2 M3"
Plan D USE OF THE CONTAMINATED AMINE FROM ISG WITH OASE ENRICHED AND PURPLE
MDEA 70%
PZ 18%
OASE Enriched "4 M3"
MDEA 40%
PZ 41%
Amine from ISG "400 M3"
MDEA 40.29%
TEG 6.85%
Pz 1.47%
Amine from GTG "Variable"
MDEA 33
HEP 4.04
Plan G USE OF THE CONTAMINATED AMINE FROM ISG WITH AMINE OF GTG
TEG 0.25

Amine from ISG "400 M3"

MDEA 40.29%
TEG 6.85%
Pz 1.47%
Amine from GTG "Variable"
MDEA 33
HEP 4.04
PLAN H USE OF THE CONTAMINATED AMINE FROM ISG WITH AMINE OF GTG AND OASE
TEG 0.25
OASE Purple "68.2 M3"
MDEA 70%
PZ 18%
OASE Enriched "4 M3"
MDEA 40%
PZ 41%
Amine from GTG "700 M3"
MDEA 33
HEP 4.04
Plan E USE OF THE AMINE OF GTG TEG 0.25
Plan E USE OF THE AMINE OF GTG

Amine from GTG "Variable"

MDEA 33
HEP 4.04
TEG 0.25
OASE Purple "68.2 M3"
Plan F USE OF THE AMINE OF GTG WITH OASE
MDEA 70%
PZ 18%
OASE Enriched "4 M3"
MDEA 40%
PZ 41%
Operating Risk assessment
Risks&Constraints Advantage Disadvantage
Delivery time for months Unit as designed by Axens
Risk of contamination
Plant shut down for a months

insufficient quantity of Low absorption capacity

conatminated Amine

foaming Acceptable absorption capacity

Shut down Production forcast 6 MSM3
Trial plan to perform the Plan A
Very low budget

foaming Acceptable absorption capacity Unit not designed for the OASE
Shut down Production forcast 8-10 MSM3 purple and Enriched and aMDEA
Trial plan to perform the Plan A as per AXENS
Low budget

foaming Very low export Flow

Shut down Hg carry-over
Asset damage
 Acceptable absorption capacity
foaming Production forcast 3 MSM3
Shut down Trial plan to perform the Plan A
Low concentration Low budget
Low volume
 Results&Comments

Amine quality Qty (m3) MDEA % TEG% PZ% H2O%

472.2 210.50 27.41 19.81 214.47
44.58 5.80 4.20 45.42
1000 m3 1000 21.05 2.74 1.98 74.23
900 m3 900 23.39 3.05 2.20 71.36
800m3 800 26.31 3.43 2.48 67.78

Our calculations were based on 25 isotanks of contaminated Amine, we have received

only 22, and only 16 are judged at the moment acceptable waiting the total analysis.

Amine quality Qty (m3) MDEA % TEG% PZ% H2O%

ISG+25%GTG 575 219 27 6 206
38 5 1 36
ISG+35%GTG 645 243 27 6 206
38 4 1 32
ISG+50%GTG 750 277 27 6 206
37 4 1 27
ISG+75%GTG 925 335 27 6 206
36 3 1 22
ISG+100%GTG 1000 394 27 6 573
39 3 1 57
Skimming to be done day and night
Additional make-up of OASE purple and Enriched to be done if needed
Process control to be very well monitored and implemented
Amine quality Qty (m3) MDEA % TEG% PZ% H2O%
ISG+25%GTG+OASE 647.2 268.60 27.41 19.81 214.47
and aMDEA 41.50 4.24 3.06 33.14
ISG+35%GTG+OASE 717.2 291.84 27.41 19.81 214.47
40.69 3.82 2.76 29.90
ISG+50%GTG+OASE 822.2 326.70 27.41 19.81 214.47
39.74 3.33 2.41 26.09
ISG+75%GTG+OASE 997.2 384.80 27.41 19.81 214.47
38.59 2.75 1.99 21.51
ISG+100%GTG+OASE 1172.2 442.90 27.41 19.81 214.47
37.78 2.34 1.69 18.30

Amine quality Qty (m3) MDEA % TEG% HEP% H2O%

100% GTG 700 33 0.25 4.04
1000 23.24
Amine quality Qty (m3) MDEA % TEG% HEP% H2O%
100%GTG+OASE 772.2 281.74 0.00 13.92 8.94
36.49 0.00 1.80 1.16