See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/351911867

Evaluating The Effects of Aim Lab Training on Filipino Valorant Players'

Shooting Accuracy

Conference Paper · April 2021

DOI: 10.1109/ICIEA52957.2021.9436822

CITATIONS READS
0 3,430

2 authors, including:

Yogi Tri Prasetyo

Mapúa Institute of Technology
87 PUBLICATIONS   426 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Evaluating Camouflage Design Across Countries using Camouflage Similarity Index (CSI) View project

Yamaha Flute Indonesia Project View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Yogi Tri Prasetyo on 29 May 2021.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

 2021 IEEE 8th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Applications
Evaluating The Effects of Aim Lab Training on Filipino Valorant Players' Shooting
Accuracy
Cheselle Jan Roldan
School of Industrial Engineering and Engineering
2021 IEEE 8th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Applications (ICIEA) | 978-1-6654-2895-8/21/$31.00 ©2021 IEEE | DOI: 10.1109/ICIEA52957.2021.9436822
Management Mapúa University
658 Muralla St., Intramuros, Manila 1002, Philippines
e-mail: cjlroldan@mymail.mapua.edu.ph
Abstract—Being an MMOFPS gamer is quickly becoming a
lucrative career option as professional FPS e-sports player,
FPS game content creator, and FPS game streamer. However,
to be able to have this as a career, an aspiring player should
improve their in-game skills where shooting accuracy is one of
the main ingredients for success. The study focused on
Valorant, the fastest rising FPS e-sport of 2020, and Aim Lab,
the best known FPS training software, with 6 Filipino
nationals as participants. For 1 week, the participants were
subjected to train on Aim Lab’s recommended training set
every day before playing Valorant. The results of the study
concluded that doing the 6 recommended training on Aim
Lab, for a total of 6 minutes every day, before playing
Valorant for 1 week led to a significant improvement in the
average damage output generated per round. The study also
concluded that Aim Lab, as an FPS training software, is
deemed acceptable by the participants as per System
Usability Scale standards.
Keywords-valorant, aim lab, FPS training, MMOFPS, e-
sports
I. INTRODUCTION
The earliest first-person shooter (FPS) game
documented was in 1973 [1]. Since then, FPS games
became the second most popular type of video game after
casual single-player games [2]. Today, first-person shooter
games have evolved into massively multiplayer online first
person shooter (MMOFPS) games with over 1 billion
gamers playing worldwide. The emergence of e-sports,
online game streaming, and online gaming content
production turned MMOFPS from a hobby into a
potentially lucrative long-term career. In the 2020 e- sports
arena alone, the global audience sits at 495 million with
market revenue of $1.06 billion [3], while the top 10 e-
sports tournaments have a combined prize pool of $177
million in 2019 [4], which may point to the reason why a
2020 consumer survey reported that more than 38% of
gamers would like to become professionals [2].
Riot Games, the company behind the popular Multi-
player Online Battle Arena (MOBA) game and e-sport,
League of Legends, has recently released Valorant on June
4, 2020. Valorant, the company’s first FPS game, is quickly
becoming the next haven of first-person shooter e-sports. Riot
Games revealed that almost 3 million players log on daily during
its closed-beta phase [5], which is the reason why Valorant is
978-1-6654-2895-8/21/$31.00 ©2021 IEEE
Authorized licensed use limited to: Mapua University. Downloaded on May 29,2021 at 15:42:38 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
Yogi Tri Prasetyo
School of Industrial Engineering and Engineering
Management Mapúa University
658 Muralla St., Intramuros, Manila 1002, Philippines
e-mail: ytprasetyo@mapua.edu.ph
one of the most viewed gaming content on Twitch, the world's
leading live streaming platform for gamers, with a total of 37.4
million hours of watch time in the 4th quarter of 2020 alone [6].
Valorant also secured the 2nd most trending keyword spot on Google
for the year 2020 according to SEM Rush [7], a competitive
research company, as shown on Figure 1.
Figure 1. SEM Rush’s Report: “Top Google Searches and Trending
Keywords in 2020”
The significant audience, market revenue, and e-sport
tournament prize pool help make MMOFPS gamers’ dreams
of gaming as a professional a possible reality. However, the
competition is intense and would require a systematic
improvement of shooting performance until they achieve a
level of skill that would allow them to be scouted by
professional e-sports teams or at the very least, entertain a
significant amount of online audience to generate revenue
through ads and sponsorship.
There’s a significant number of studies made on first-
person shooter games, but most of them focused on team play,
level design, bot deep learning, network latency’s effects on
playing satisfaction, and automated aim adjustment for better
matchmaking between beginners and experts. However, there
are only a few studies made on the effects of FPS training
software on an FPS player’s shooting accuracy, and most of
them run the risk of conflict of interest since the few studies
published are made by the FPS training software companies
themselves. Most importantly, there are no studies made on
the game Valorant, as it’s only recently released in June 2020.
To fill this gap, the research will focus on assessing the
effects of Aim Lab, an FPS training software, on the shooting
accuracy of Filipino Valorant players, as well as the level of
satisfaction and comfort the players, if a positive correlation
465
between FPS training and shooting accuracy has been
determined. The researcher thinks this study will be highly
relevant to FPS e-sports companies, FPS e-sports teams,
and professional FPS players, as well as casual FPS players
looking to improve their in-game rank and performance.
This paper may contribute to the overall playing
performance, satisfaction, and comfort of Valorant players
as well as determining if FPS training software actually
fosters shootingaccuracy improvement.
II. METHODOLOGY
A. Participants
The study has 6 Filipino Valorant players as participants.
The age of the participants ranges from 18 to 28. Males
dominated the participant pool at 100%. Most of the
participants’ highest educational attainment is College at
66.6% (4), followed by High school at 33.3% (2). In terms
of years of FPS playing experience, 50% (3) of the
participants have below 1 year of playing experience. In
terms of Valorant playing experience, 50% (3) are playing
the game for 3 months. 83% (5) of the participants
reported that they primarily use PC/Laptop to play FPS
games and 83% (5) are right-handed. Figure 2. The variability of tracker.gg/valorant Accuracy statistics between 2
players
The participants were also asked about disorders,
diseases, and disabilities that limit FPS gaming To address this problem, the study will focus on other
performance, like visual impairment, wrist/arm problems, tracker.gg/valorant statistics that directly shows the
back pain, and neuromuscular disorders and none of them consistency and impact of shots landed on opposing players
reported to have any of these problems. Lastly, the on Valorant, such as:
participants were also asked about their perceived FPS The average Kill/Assist/Death (KAD) Ratio, which is
game skill level which revealed that 83% (5) of participants calculated as the sum of Kills and Assists divided by the sum
think that they’re in the‘Beginner’ or ‘Intermediate’ level. of Deaths.
It should be noted that only 1 participant is left-handed The average Kill/Death (K/D) Ratio, which is calculated
and only 1 participant listed their perceived skill level as as the sum of Kills over the sum of Deaths.
‘Advanced’. Headshot %, calculated as the overall percentage of
B. Apparatus headshots from all matches.
Valorant doesn’t have an in-game performance The average Kills/Round, which is calculated as the total
number of kills made per round on every matches.
statistics tracker, thus the data of the participants’ Valorant
in-game performance will be collected on The average Damage/Round, which shows the average
damage the player has dealt every round. It should be noted
tracker.gg/valorant, cited as ‘the best Valorant stat tracker’
online [7]. The researcher of the study has tried other that Valorant players has a 100 health every start of a round
and can buy a Light Armor, which provides a 25-point
Valorant statistical trackers but encountered significant
damage negation and a Heavy Armor, which provides a 50-
difficulties, especially in terms of accessibility. The data to
point damage negation. This means a Valorant player has to
be collected will be limited to the Competitive matches
deal at least 150 damage to secure a kill, all things held equal.
only as these matches are rated and are required to rank up,
The average Score/Round, also known as Combat Score,
providing players the incentive to focus and play better,
which shows the total score a Valorant player receives every
which will lead to better data quality. Aim Lab training
round. It should be noted that Valorant has a specific scoring
performance data will be collected within the FPS training
system which is detailed as follows: 1 point for every damage
software’s skill database itself.
point dealt (Example: 150 points for 150 damage dealt);
The accuracy statistics on tracker.gg/valorant is based
150/130/110/90/70 kill points based on the number of
on previous matches played and is highly dependent on the
enemies alive (Example: 150 points when you killed an
total number of matches played making it an unreliable
opponent with 4 more opponent teammates alive, 70 points
basis of accuracy improvement despite its name. The
when you killed the last remaining opponent); An additional
variability and the resulting unreliability of the Accuracy
50 points every time you scored a multiple kill (Example: A
statistics on tracker.gg/valorant is shown on Figure 2.
Valorant player gets 330 points for killing 2 opponents
successively)
All these data are all available on tracker.gg/valorant’s
statistics dashboard as shown in Figure 3.

466

Authorized licensed use limited to: Mapua University. Downloaded on May 29,2021 at 15:42:38 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
 Figure 3. tracker.gg/valorant Statistics Dashboard
These statistics are all related to the shooting
effectiveness of a Valorant player. Additional emphasis
should be given to the Damage/Round and Score/Round
statistics, since these 2 data actually reveals whether the
Valorant player hits an enemy ornot.
Aim Lab statistics are categorized into 6 main statistics:
Flicking, Tracking, Speed, Precision, Perception, and
Cognition. Accordingly, Aim Lab described the logic
behindall the main statistics as follows:
Flicking and Tracking are both accuracy-based skills,
with each representing a player’s average accuracy in their
given styles of aim. This varies from 0 to 100, in
accordance with the player’s performance.
Speed is a metric of how quickly a player can destroy a
targetafter it spawns.
Precision is dictated by a player’s ability to engage
smaller targets effectively and is improved by consistently
and efficiently destroying smaller and smaller targets.
Perception is a mental rating and is determined by a
player’sability to assess a situation and react to it.
Cognition is the player’s ability to process information
quickly and correctly.
All of these statistics are updated every time a user
completestheir training as shown in Figure 4
Figure 4. Aim Lab Performance Data.
Aside from this, the player’s overall Aim Lab score
and rank will also be included in the statistics to gauge the
Valorant player’s performance throughout the week-long
training. Rankings are based on the overall performance
score of the player with bronze rank as the lowest and
grandmaster as thehighest (Figure 5).
467
Authorized licensed use limited to: Mapua University. Downloaded on May 29,2021 at 15:42:38 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
Figure 5. Aim Lab Performance Ranking
C. Procedure
To gauge the effect of Aim Lab training on the Valorant
player’s shooting accuracy and performance, participants’
Valorant and Aim Lab data on the first day will be gathered.
For 1 week, the participants will be required to complete the
6 daily recommended training on Aim Lab’s software before
playing Valorant. Each training lasts for 1 minute, totaling to
6 minutes of training per day. Upon completion, their
Valorant and Aim Lab data will be taken again for
comparison.
The study will use the System Usability Scale
questionnaire to gauge the participants’ compatibility with the
FPS trainingsoftware a 5-point Likert scale.
TABLE I. SYSTEM USABILITY SCALE QUESTIONNAIRE
I think that I would like to use Aim Lab frequently.
I found Aim Lab unnecessarily complex.
I thought Aim Lab was easy to use.
I think that I would need the support of a technical personto be able to use
Aim Lab.
I found the various functions in Aim Lab were wellintegrated.
I thought there was too much inconsistency in Aim Lab.
I would imagine that most FPS gamers would learn to useAim Lab very
quickly.
I found Aim Lab very cumbersome to use.
I felt very confident using Aim Lab.
I needed to learn a lot of things before I could get goingwith Aim
Lab.
I'm satisfied with my shooting performance on Valorant
I'm physically comfortable while playing Valorant
D. Variables any changes, while the rest improved, where one participant
The goal of this study is to answer this key question: sawa 65.31% improvement jump.
Does Aim Lab training help Filipino Valorant players In the Speed skill category, only 1 participant didn’t show
improve their shooting accuracy? From this question, Aim any changes while the rest improved by as much as 68.24%.
Lab training is identified as the independent variable, In the Precisions category, all the participants showed
while the shooting accuracy of Filipino Valorant players is improvement albeit 2 participants showed marginal
the dependent variable. improvements as low as 0.25%.
In the Perception category, only 3 participants showed
E. Statistical Analysis improvement while the rest didn’t show any skill
The study will use a two-tailed Paired-Sample T-Test improvement or deterioration. This is even more visible in the
as its statistical analysis tool to compare the before and Cognition category where 4 out of 6 participants didn’t show
after data of the participants after 1 week of doing the any changes, albeit 1 participant showed a 223.32%
recommended training on Aim Lab. improvement.
It should be noted that the poor performance on Aim
III. RESULTS Lab’s Perception & Cognition skill categories are due to Aim
Lab’s recommended training, which rarely includes
A. Tracker.gg/Valorant Results Perception & Cognition training.
After the week-long training on Aim Lab, 4 out of 6 The rest of the participants’ Overall Score on Aim Lab
participants have shown an improvement in their showed improvements, ranging from a low of 0.99% to a high
Kill/Assist/Death (KAD) Ratio with one participant of 38.90%.
gaining a 6.54% improvement. The remaining two didn’t
have any improvement at all. While in terms of Kill/Death TABLE III. AIM LAB T-TEST ANALYSIS
Ratio, 5 out of 6 have shown improvement where the same Aim Lab Skill T-Test Result Status
participant with the best KAD improvement had a 7.06%
Flicking 0.08792430855 Insignificant
improvement.
Tracking 0.1198682816 Insignificant
In the Damage/Round category, all the participants
gained improvement where one participant had a 7.82% Speed 0.02004547448 Significant
improvement. While in the Headshot % category, only Precision 0.04498950608 Significant
1 participant had an increase of headshot rate from 5% to Perception 0.1435454009 Insignificant
7%. The trend in improvement changed in the Cognition 0.353577483 Insignificant
Score/Round category as 2 participants had a performance Overall Score 0.08191718011 Insignificant
decrease, where one of them led to a -3.12% performance
loss. Of the 6 Aim Lab Skill categories, Speed and Precision
It is interesting to note that in the Kills/Round category skill improvements are deemed significant by the T-Test
each participant’s statistics remained the same, none of the analysisagainst a P-value of <0.05 as show in in Table III.
participants gained any improvements or losses. This
subsequently leads to the removal of this aim variable TABLE IV. AIM LAB RANK CHANGES
from the T-Test analysis shown in Table II.
Aim Lab Rank Aim Lab Rank Changes
TABLE II. TRACKER.GG/VALORANT T-TEST ANALYSIS Pre-Training Post-Training
Gold 3 Gold 3 0
Aim Variable T-Test Result Status
Silver 2 Gold 4 2
Kill/Assist/Death 0.05742722438 Insignificant
Silver 1 Gold 2 3
Ratio
Silver 3 Silver 1 2
Kill/Death Ratio 0.08958917393 Insignificant
Gold 4 Gold 3 1
Headshot % 0.3632174676 Insignificant
Platinum 1 Emerald 2 7
Damage/Round 0.02891556703 Significant
Score/Round 0.2930119409 Insignificant
Of the 6 participants, only 1 didn’t show any rank
changes while the rest showed an improvement ranging from
Of the remaining 5 aim categories, the Damage/Round 1-rank change up to a 7-rank change, as shown in Table IV.
aim variable is the only one that showed significance
against a P-value of < 0.05. C. SUS Questionnaire Results
B. Aim Lab Results TABLE V. SUS SCORE
In the Flicking skill, only 1 participant didn’t show any Participant SUS Score
skill improvement or deterioration while the rest showed Participant #1 70
improvements with one participant showing a 30.66%,
improvement. In the Tracking skill category, 1 participant Participant #2 60
suffered a -5.43% deterioration and another didn’t show Participant #3 67.5

468

Authorized licensed use limited to: Mapua University. Downloaded on May 29,2021 at 15:42:38 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
 Participant #4 52.5
Participant #5 75
Participant #6 87.5
SUS Score Average 68.75
Of the 6 participants, 2 showed an SUS score below 64
showing that Aim Lab as an FPS Training Software is
unacceptable while 1 participant scored above 87.5,
showingthe FPS Training Software as excellent.
Taking the average of all the SUS Scores gathered from
each participant as shown in Table 5, the result shows an
average score of 68.75 making Aim Lab acceptable as an
FPS Training Software as per System Usability Scale
standards.
IV. DISCUSSION
From the resulting evaluation, it appears that 1 week of
doing Aim Lab’s 6 recommended training gave a
significant performance boost of the 6 participants in the
Damage/Round category, which means they’re hitting
more of their opponents. Of the 6 participants, only 1
participant showed the biggest and most consistent
improvements in most categories. It’s interesting to note
that this participant is the only who’s left-handed from the
participant pool.
On the Aim Lab training results, it reveals significant
improvements in the Speed and Precision skill categories,
meaning the participants are placing their crosshair in the
right places in the right time. This possibly explains the
significant improvement in their Damage/Round
performance in Valorant.
Of all the players in the participant pool, only 1
participant made consistent and huge improvements, and
this participant is the only one who listed ‘Advanced’ as
their perceived skill level. It’s interesting to note that the
same participant provided the best SUS score for Aim Lab.
The results of this study corresponds with the 2015
experiment made by Yoxon, Tremblay, and Welsh on the
effect of task-specific execution on accuracy of imagined
aiming movements, which shows that the imagined aiming
movements almost mirrors the actual aiming movements
[8]. Relating to the study, the imagined aiming movements
is facilitated by the Aim Lab training, where targets are
primarily blue orbs, and the resulting improvement in
damage output per round on Valorant as the actual aiming
movement where the targets are modeled after human-type
bodies. The conclusion from Sennersten and Lindley’s
2009 study on player response to visual cues, which states
that the graphical representation of the weapon does not
have a strong role in cuing visual attention [9] also
supports this discovery as the Aim Lab training primarily
uses a pistol as the training weapon while in Valorant
games, the commonly used firing weapons are rifles and
machine guns.
The dramatic difference in Aim Lab training
performance between participants who listed their
perceived FPS skill level as ‘Beginner’ and ‘Advanced’
also supports the study made by Choi and Mijin in 2017
469
Authorized licensed use limited to: Mapua University. Downloaded on May 29,2021 at 15:42:38 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
that shows that there’s a significant eye gaze difference
between novices and experts [10], which might explain the
advantage of an ‘Advanced’ player over a ‘Beginner’ player
on Aim Lab, which consists of training sets that push an FPS
player’s ability to the limit.
The acceptance of the participants on using Aim Lab as
an FPS training tool is probably linked to the fact that they’re
FPS players beforehand and had at least 3 months of playing
Valorant. As revealed by Deleuze et al. in their 2017 study
that shows FPS players display reduced reaction times than
their other gamer counterparts [11], this explains why all
participants improved on every Aim Lab skill and all of them
have an improved overall score as they already have the FPS
gaming experience and the subsequent reaction time required
to succeed in the Aim Lab training tasks. This makes the
training more enjoyable and the goals more achievable,
which led to the resulting acceptance of Aim Lab.
This study’s goal is to evaluate whether Aim Lab training
actually helps Valorant players’ shooting performance, as a
response to a growing positive online sentiment for Aim Lab
as an FPS training tool and to objectively measure its effects
on Valorant players’ shooting accuracy as opposed to a report
provided on Aim Lab’s website that says ‘Play Aim Lab and
you get better, play more and you get even better.’[12],
claims that are at risk of bias and conflict of interest.
It’s interesting to note that throughout the imposed week-
long Aim Lab training, most of the participants are vocal on
their approval of Aim Lab as an FPS training software and
their immediate shooting performance improvement, openly
correlating the Aim Lab Training and their improved
shooting performance.
While the results of the study shows that even a week of
doing the minimum recommended Aim Lab training before
playing Valorant improves the Damage/Round statistics of
Filipino Valorant players at the very least, the study is
limited in terms of the number of participants, nationality,
training duration, and training routine. The last part should be
particularly noted as FPS players who praise Aim Lab’s
effectiveness mostly use a customized Aim Lab training
routine.
For future researchers, this study may be used as a
foundation for other FPS games and even provide a more
accurate look at the effects of Aim Lab training on shooting
accuracy by increasing the number of participants, the
duration of training, creating a customized Aim Lab training
routine, and by expanding the nationality scope of the players.
V. CONCLUSION
Overall, Aim Lab is deemed ‘Acceptable’ as an FPS
Training Software for Filipino Valorant players as per System
Usability Scale standards.
The results of the study shows that at least 1 week of
training on Aim Lab, which can also be considered as 42
training tasks completed or 6 minutes of Aim Lab training
before playing Valorant, will lead to a significant
improvement in a Filipino Valorant player’s average damage
output per round at the very least.
 ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The researcher would like to thank and acknowledge
David Gabriel Villanueva and Lance Joseph Villanueva
for the contribution and support provide throughout the
study.
REFERENCES
[1] J. Garmon, “Geek Trivia: First shots fired,” TechRepublic, 24-May-
2005. [Online]. Available:
https://www.techrepublic.com/article/geek- trivia-first-shots-fired/.
[Accessed: 23-Jan-2021]. J. Clerk Maxwell, A Treatise on
Electricity and Magnetism, 3rd ed., vol. 2. Oxford: Clarendon, 1892,
pp.68–73.
[2] Limelight Networks, Market Research: The State of Online Gaming
– 2019,15-Mar-2019.[Online].Available:
https://www.limelight.com/resources/white-paper/state-of-online-
gaming2019/#:~:text=First%2Dperson%20shooter%20games%20su
c Attention in FPS Computer Gameplay,” 2009 Conference in Games
h%20as%20Call%20of%20Duty%2C%20Destiny,PUBG%2C%20
M ultiplayer%20Online%20Battle%20Arena.
[3] C. Gough, “Expected global eSports audience 2018-23,” Statista,
02- Dec-2020.[Online].Available:
https://www.statista.com/statistics/1100202/global-esports-
audience-
numbers/#:~:text=Expected%20global%20eSports%20audience%2
0n
umbers%202018%2D2023%2C%20by%20type&amp;text=The%2
0e
Sports%20audience%20is%20expected,28.2%20million%20year%
20 on%20year.
[4] Jastra Ilic 7. November 2019 |UPDATED ON: 7. November 2019, J.
Ilic, 7. November 2019 |UPDATED ON: 7. November 2019, U. On:
About Jastra Ilic Jastra is an editor, and View all posts by Jastra Ilic
→, “Top 10 eSports Prize Pools Reach $177 Million in November,”
Golden Casino News, 7-Nov-2019. [Online]. Available:
470
View publication stats Authorized licensed use limited to: Mapua University. Downloaded on May 29,2021 at 15:42:38 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
https://goldencasinonews.com/blog/2019/11/07/top-10-esports-prize-
pools-reach-177-million-in-november/.
[5] E. Kent, “Valorant's closed beta pulled in 3m daily players,”
Eurogamer.net,29-May-2020.[Online].Available:
https://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2020-05-29-valorants-closed- beta-
pulled-in-3m-daily-players.
[6] P. by S. R. Department and J. 13, “Top games on Twitch by hours
viewed 2020,” Statista, 13-Jan-2021. [Online]. Available:
https://www.statista.com/statistics/507786/leading-game-content-
twitch-by-number-hours-viewed/.
[7] “Valorant: Stat tracker - which one is the best? - Valorant Guide,”
GameGuides.[Online].Available:https://guides.gamepressure.com/val
orant/guide.asp?ID=54610#:~:text=So%20far%2C%20a%20sensible%
20stat,Legends%20and%20Player%20Unknown's%20Battlegrounds.
[8] E. Yoxon, L. Tremblay, and T. N. Welsh, “Effect of task-specific
execution on accuracy of imagined aiming movements,” Neuroscience
Letters, vol. 585, pp. 72–76, 2015.
[9] C. C. Sennersten and C. A. Lindley, “An Investigation of Visual
and Virtual Worlds for Serious Applications, 2009.
[10] G. H. Choi and M. Kim, “Eye gaze information of player using objects
in FPS game space,” 2017 IEEE 6th Global Conference on Consumer
Electronics (GCCE), 2017.
[11] J. Deleuze, M. Christiaens, F. Nuyens, and J. Billieux, “Shoot at first
sight! First person shooter players display reduced reaction time and
compromised inhibitory control in comparison to other video game
players,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 72, pp. 570–576, 2017.
[12] J. Listman, “Does Aim Lab actually help you improve?,” Aim Lab, 09-
Apr-2020. [Online]. Available: https://aimlab.gg/does-aim-lab-
actually-help-you-
improve/#:~:text=The%20data%20shows%3A%20Play%20Aim,play
%2C%20depending%20on%20your%20performance. [Accessed: 03-
Feb-2021].