OP 1110 Audit Failure and Risk Mitigation

Nadcap OPERATING PROCEDURE OP 1110
AUDIT FAILURE AND RISK MITIGATION Page 1 of 14

Document Owner: Michael Graham Issue Date: 19-Apr-2015
Revision Date: 30-Mar-2021
*To be used for audits starting on or after 04-Jul-2021*
1.0 PURPOSE
This procedure defines failure criteria and establishes the processes for audit
failure and risk mitigation.
2.0 SCOPE
The procedure applies to all audit types and accreditation options.
3.0 DEFINITIONS
See OP 1103 for definitions.
4.0 PROCEDURE
4.1 An audit may be failed for any of the reasons categorized by the modes of
failure defined below.
Mode A – Auditee stops audit or fails to meet program requirements
• Auditee cancels an audit that is being conducted or is in the audit review

process
• A linked audit fails
• No evidence of a valid Quality System certificate
• The Auditee fails to meet the terms of the Auditee Agreement
Mode B – Excessive Number of NCRs
• The Total NCRs or Major NCRs exceed the thresholds defined in Table 1
− When applicable, compressed audits shall be assessed against the
criteria for the uncompressed (normal) length
• For Verification of Corrective Action Audits (VCA), any non-sustaining
NCRs are identified
• Initial (Re-entry) Audits shall be evaluated using Reaccreditation Audit
failure criteria in Table 1
• Add Scope audits shall be evaluated using Initial Audit failure criteria in
Table 1
Mode C – Severity of NCRs
• The Auditee has NCRs severe enough to warrant failure. Examples of

issues that could be considered for Mode C are:
− Potential or Actual Product Impact
− Gross Systems Breakdown
− Lack of Management Control
− Falsification of Documents
i-frm-1101 20-May-2020
Mode D – Too Many Review Cycles
• All NCRs are not Accepted/Closed/Void after the review of the fourth cycle
as indicated by the cycle count displayed in eAuditNet
− An allowance of up to two (2) additional response cycles as displayed
in eAuditNet are permitted at the discretion of the Audit Report
Reviewer. This is to allow for situations where a full cycle has not been
completed; such as where the audit was submitted to SE Review in
error, missing objective evidence, communication issues, etc.
• In the case where the audit has been submitted for Task Group Review,
all Task Group Ballot comments are not addressed after two (2) cycles
Mode E – Non-Responsiveness by Auditee
• The audit has accumulated greater than 30 days of Cumulative Response

Delinquency
4.2 Audits meeting the Mode A failure criteria do not require a failure ballot and
shall follow the failure process defined in 4.5.
4.3 Audits meeting any of the Modes B, C, D, or E failure criteria shall be

submitted to the Task Group Subscriber Voting Members on a failure ballot.
4.3.1 A VCA audit failure ballot does not require a failure ballot for the main audit.
4.3.2 The Task Group has a minimum of seven (7) days to review the failure ballot.
4.3.3 A quorum is required to ensure the Failure Ballot decision is valid.
4.3.3.1 The ballot length shall be extended as necessary to obtain quorum.
4.3.3.2 Votes to not fail an audit shall include a rationale for voting not to fail.
4.3.3.3 A 2/3 majority of respondents is required to fail an audit.
4.3.4 Task Group Subscriber Voting Members voting to fail an audit shall also vote
on withdrawal of the current accreditation.
4.3.4.1 In the case where the audit was failed by the Task Group, any vote to not fail
the audit shall also be considered a vote to not withdraw the current
accreditation.
4.4 If the Task Group decides to not fail an audit, the audit shall be returned to
Auditee Review to continue the audit review process per OP 1106 Audit
Report Review.
4.5 If the Task Group decides to fail an audit, the following actions shall be taken:
4.5.1 The audit status shall be set to Failed.

4.5.2 If there is a current accreditation associated with the failed audit, it shall be
withdrawn unless otherwise agreed by the Task Group in the failure ballot.
4.5.3 The Auditee shall be notified of the audit failure and the requirements for risk
mitigation.
4.5.4 The Subscriber Voting Members and PRI Staff associated with Task Groups
where the Auditee holds current accreditation or has an in-process audit, shall
be notified of the audit failure.
4.5.5 An Auditee Advisory shall be issued per OP 1109 Auditee Advisories.
4.6 Actions on audits/accreditations linked with a failed audit.
4.6.1 When a VCA audit fails, the main audit shall also be failed per Mode A.
4.6.2 A linked AC7004 audit shall fail per Mode A or accreditation withdrawn per
OP 1107 Post Accreditation Actions, if a commodity audit fails and the
Auditee does not hold another Nadcap accreditation.
4.6.3 If a commodity audit fails and the Auditee holds AC7004 and at least one
other Nadcap accreditation, the AQS Task Group shall review the failed audit
to determine if actions are required on the AC7004 accreditation.
4.6.3.1 Evidence of AQS Task Group review and subsequent decision(s) shall be
documented in the failed audit.
4.6.4 When an Add Scope Audit fails, the linked accreditation may be withdrawn
per OP 1107 Post Accreditation Actions or any in process audits may be
balloted for failure.
4.6.5 When an Add Scope Audit is linked to an audit that fails, the Add Scope Audit
shall fail per Mode A.
4.6.6 Failures of linked Main and Satellite audits shall follow the process defined by
the applicable Task Group in OP 1114 Task Group Operation.
4.6.7 When an Option B Audit fails, the Nadcap Management Council (NMC)
Subscriber Voting Members on the applicable Review Team shall review the
failed audit and consider if any action(s) is warranted on other audits in the
scope of accreditation. Actions may include, but are not limited to the
following:
• Issue certificate for all linked audits excluding any failed audits
• Withhold all or a subset of linked audits (based upon site and or
commodity) until Risk Mitigation is completed
• Fail all or a subset of linked audits (based upon site and or commodity)
• Require an Observation of an internal audit performed by the Auditee
• Require additional PRI verification audits on the following year audit plan
• Other actions as agreed by the Review Team
4.6.7.1 Evidence of Review Team review and any decision(s) on linked audits shall
be documented in the Option B HQ audit.
4.7 Actions for failed AC7004 audits
4.7.1 When an initial or reaccreditation AC7004 audit fails and the Auditee does not
have an acceptable alternative quality system per PD 1100 Nadcap Program
Requirements, the following actions shall be taken:
4.7.1.1 The status of any scheduled Initial Audit shall be changed to Initiated.
4.7.1.2 Any other in-process audit shall fail per Mode A.
4.7.1.3 Any existing accreditation shall be withdrawn per OP 1107 Post Accreditation
Action.
4.7.2 When an AC7004 Reaccreditation audit fails, any existing accreditation shall
be handled per OP 1107 Post Accreditation Action.
4.8 Risk Mitigation process for failed audits
4.8.1 The purpose of the Risk Mitigation process is to provide the opportunity for:
• The Auditee to document corrective actions for NCRs;

• Corrective action responses to undergo a formal review and approval
process;
• Subscribers to have visibility of the Auditee’s corrective action responses
and ability to provide input into their acceptability;
• Visibility of corrective action responses to the next auditor to allow
effective verification of implementation.
4.8.2 All failed audits must successfully complete Risk Mitigation prior to an Initial
(Re-entry) Audit being initiated.
4.8.2.1 If 24 months have elapsed since the date of failure, Risk Mitigation is not
required.
4.8.2.2 The new scope of a failed Add Scope Audit cannot be included in a future
accreditation audit within 24 months of failure unless Risk Mitigation has been
completed for the failed Add Scope Audit.
4.8.2.3 Where the same checklists are used by more than one Task Group, a
checklist that was included in an audit that failed cannot be added to a future
accreditation audit within 24 months of failure unless Risk Mitigation has been
completed for the failed audit or otherwise approved by the Task Group of the
failed audit.
4.8.2.3.1 To obtain approval, the Auditee shall submit an appeal per OP 1113 Appeals
to the Task Group that failed the audit.
4.8.3 The Auditee shall agree to pay the required fees prior to starting Risk
Mitigation.
4.8.4 Audits with zero Open NCRs upon entering Risk Mitigation shall be moved
directly to Risk Mitigation Completed without ballot.
4.8.5 NCR responses shall be in accordance with OP 1106 Audit Report

Processing.
4.8.5.1 Auditees shall provide responses to all Open NCRs within 21 days of the date
the Audit enters or resumes the Risk Mitigation process.
4.8.5.2 Subsequent Auditee responses are due within seven (7) days.
4.8.5.3 The Audit Report Reviewer shall review responses within 14 days.
4.8.6 If responses are not adequate to close all NCRs after four (4) cycles in Risk
Mitigation, or the audit has accumulated greater than 30 days of Cumulative
Response Delinquency in Risk Mitigation, the Audit Report Reviewer shall
ballot the audit for suspension of Risk Mitigation, identifying the reason in the
ballot.
4.8.6.1 The Task Group has a minimum of seven (7) days to review the suspension
ballot.
4.8.6.2 A quorum is required to ensure the suspension ballot decision is valid.
4.8.6.2.1 The ballot shall be extended as necessary to obtain quorum.
4.8.6.3 A 2/3 majority of respondents is required to suspend Risk Mitigation.
4.8.6.4 Votes to not suspend Risk Mitigation shall include the rationale for not
suspending.
4.8.6.5 The Auditee shall be notified if Risk Mitigation is suspended.
4.8.6.6 To resume the Risk Mitigation process, the Auditee must submit an appeal in
accordance with OP 1113 Appeals.
4.8.7 Once all NCRs are resolved, the audit shall be submitted for Task Group
Review.
4.8.8 Audit reports shall be in Task Group Review for a minimum of seven (7) days.
4.8.8.1 The Task Group review period may be extended if necessary.

4.8.9 Accept with Comments votes shall have the comments resolved, and when
requested, the resolution shall be agreed to by the commenter.
4.8.9.1 Resubmission of the audit for Task Group Review is not required.
4.8.10 A Disapprove vote requires the comment associated with the disapproval to
be resolved.
4.8.10.1 After resolution, the audit report shall be submitted to Task Group Review.
4.8.10.2 When there is a Disapprove vote on a second ballot for the same issue, the
Task Group Subscriber Voting Members shall resolve the disapproval with a
2/3 majority required to reject the disapproval.
4.8.11 All Subscriber comments made within the audit report (Task Group
Discussion, Ballot Screen, Forum, etc.) shall have documented
acknowledgement, and where necessary, evidence of action or resolution will
be attached in eAuditNet.
4.8.12 The status of all nonconformances shall be Closed or Void prior to completing
the Risk Mitigation process.
4.8.13 Completion of the Risk Mitigation process shall not result in accreditation of
the audit.
4.9 Initial (Re-entry) Requirements for Failed Audits:
4.9.1 An Initial (Re-entry) Audit shall only be scheduled when the Risk Mitigation
process is completed.
4.9.1.1 For audits with a start date greater than 24 months after the date of failure,
the completion of the Risk Mitigation process is not required and the audit
shall be scheduled as an Initial Audit.
4.9.2 The Initial (Re-entry) Audit shall not be conducted within 90 days of the failure
date.
4.9.3 The length of the Initial (Re-entry) Audit may be increased to allow time to
verify the corrective actions of the failed audit.
5.0 DOCUMENT REVISION HISTORY
Revision Summary
Date
19-Apr-2015 New Procedure – Transitioned from NOP-011 and PD 3000
27-Apr-2015 Annual Mode B Failure Criteria Update. (CP, COMP, CMSP, MTL,
NDT, SEAL, WLD)
29-Mar-2016 Annual Mode B Failure Criteria Update.
Revision Summary
Date
5-April-2016 Editorial change to add AC 7004 and OP 1103 to
“Referenced Documents”.
09-May-2016 Revised Section 4.1.4 to clarify that the 4-round limit on the number of
rounds of response applies prior to balloting an audit for accreditation.
The number of rounds permitted to resolve issues identified during the
ballot is at the discretion of the Task Group.
Sections 4.4 and 4.5: Revised process to require the Risk Mitigation
Review to be performed by the Staff Engineer/Consultant Reviewer
and to require Suspension or Closure of an audit via Risk Mitigation to
be approved by Task Group Subscriber Ballot.
30-Sep-2016 Remove 4.4.7.1 which allowed Task Groups to require a VCA audit
prior to scheduling a Re-entry audit. Revised 4.5.1.1 to allow the
length of time of the Re-entry audit to be adjusted to allow time for
verification of corrective actions. Revised 4.5.1 to clarify that the 90-
day timeframe starts from the date of audit failure.
It should be noted that the May 09, 2016 revision was held pending
programming changes required to support the revision in eAuditNet.
During “requirements gathering” the changes above were
recommended (and approved via ballot) to support the eAuditNet
enhancement. This revision of the procedure is being released
September 30, 2016 and is effective January 1, 2017.
16-Mar-2017 Annual Annex A (Mode B Failure Criteria) update.
20-Apr-2017 4.1.4.1- re-instated the requirement to document rationale for not

balloting an audit for failure if at 5 or 6 rounds of response. Added
clarification to 4.2.1 that linked audits fail if the VCA fails. No need to
ballot the linked audit. 4.3.2.1, 4.3.2.2 clarify that a vote not to fail an
audit is a vote not to withdraw accreditation unless otherwise specified
by the Subscriber. 4.4.3.1- Clarified that once moved into Risk
Mitigation, failed audits with no open NCR’s may be moved directly to
Risk Mitigation-Completed status without ballot. 4.4.7 to require the
Staff Engineer to verify payment has been received before the audit
can be approved.
Note: The 20-Apr-17 version effective on-or after July 23 originally

posted to eAuditNet inadvertently omitted the Annual Annex A (Mode B
Failure Criteria) update issued 16-Mar-17 effective on or after 15-Jun.
The error was detected, an ICAR issued, and the published document
corrected on 06-Sep. Please disregard any hard copies of the 20-Apr-
17 revision that may have been printed between 20-Apr and 06-Sep-
2017
Revision Summary
Date
28-Aug-2018 Complete re-write Document Transition Activity. Even Year Review.
Removed Risk Mitigation definitions; Separated out and clarified failure
modes; Mode D requirement for explanation if audit was not balloted
for number of cycles moved to OP 1106; removed 120-day
requirement from Mode E; new outcomes when an AC7004 audit fails
4.7.1; new 4.8.9, 4.8.10, 4.8.11; Process for establishing Mode B
criteria moved to Annex A; added A3.4.1
18-Mar-2019 Annual Annex A (Mode B Failure Criteria) update. (Changes to HT,
NDT, NMMM, NMMT, NMSE. Option B HQ removed due to limited
number of audits.)
29-Aug-2019 Supplier Advisory changed to Auditee Advisory; OP 1109 Supplier

Advisories changed to OP 1109 Auditee Advisories
31-Mar-2020 Annual Annex A (Mode B Failure Criteria) update. (Changes to CP,
CMSP, MTL, SLT and WLD Criteria. AQS, FLU and SEALS did not
change criteria but changed the Y/N designation indicating whether the
defined criteria fall within the 95th-98th percentile.)
31-May-2020 Editorial revision to i-frm-1101 Operating Procedure Template to
capture new Controlled Forms Name and Numbering Standard
14-Dec-2020 Even-Year Review. No changes made.
30-Mar-2021 Annual Mode B Update. The criteria for Initial MTL Audits and
Reaccreditation SEALS Audits were changed. For CP and SLT, the
limit on major NCRs in reaccreditation audit hasn’t changed but no
longer falls within the 95-98th percentile.
ANNEX A
Mode B Failure Criteria
A1.0 Each Task Group shall establish Mode B failure criteria for allowed number of
Major and Total NCRs per audit day for Initial and Reaccreditation Audits at
the first Task Group meeting of the year.
A1.1 For new Task Groups, Mode B failure criteria shall be established when a
data set meeting the requirements of A2.0 can be compiled.
A2.0 A data set for Initial Audits and Reaccreditation Audits shall be compiled for
each Task Group using audit NCR data from audits conducted in previous
years (January 1 to December 31).
A2.1 At a minimum, each data set shall include audit NCR data from the previous
year. Task Groups may elect to include multiple years of audit NCR data in
their data set.
A2.2 The Reaccreditation Audit data set shall include Reaccreditation Audits and
Initial (Re-entry) Audits.
A2.3 Each data set shall include a minimum of 32 audits.
A2.3.1 Additional years of data shall be added in full year increments as needed to
attain the minimum number of audits.
A2.4 The NCRs per audit day shall be calculated for each audit in the data set.
A2.4.1 The number of audit days in the data set shall account for multiple Auditor
audits and compressed audits.
A2.4.2 For example, the data set for an Initial Audit conducted with two (2) Auditors
lists the number of audit days as four (4). The audit scope in this case graded
to eight (8) days; however, the number of days was reduced to four (4) by
adding a second auditor. To accurately reflect the number of NCRs per audit
day, the number of audit days in the data set must be changed from four (4)
to eight (8).
A2.4.3 Auditor Trainees do not affect the number of audit days.
A3.0 Failure criteria shall be established using the compiled data sets.
A3.1 Select failure criteria per audit day where the allowed number of Major and
Total NCRs are within the limits established by the 95th and 98th percentiles.
A3.2 Determine the allowed number of Major and Total NCRs by multiplying the
calculated percentiles by the number of audit days.
A3.3 Task Groups may define an upper limit of NCRs per audit day.
A3.4 Task Groups may select failure criteria outside the limits established by the
95th and 98th percentiles based on the size and maturity of the Task Group.
A3.4.1 A rationale for failure criteria selected outside the limits established by the
95th and 98th percentiles shall be noted in meeting minutes.
A3.5 Task Group approval of Mode B Failure Criteria shall be recorded in the
meeting minutes.
A3.6 When new failure criteria are approved, Table 1 shall be updated.
A3.6.1 Changes to Table 1 are not required to be balloted per OP 1101 Document
Control.
A3.6.2 OP 1111 Accreditation Length and Merit Program shall be updated as

applicable when changes are made to Table 1.
A3.6.2.1 An enhancement request shall be submitted to update the criteria in

eAuditNet.
Table 1
Task Group Mode B Failure Criteria Criteria within

# of NCRs per Audit Day 95th and 98th
percentile?
AQS Initial
1 2 3 4 5
Major 2 2 - - - N
Total 5 5 - - - N
Reaccred
1 2 3 4 5
Major 2 2 - - - Y
Total 3 3 - - - Y
CP Initial
1 2 3 4 5+
Major 2 3 5 6 6 Y
Total 5 9 13 18 18 Y
Reaccred
1 2 3 4 5+
Major 2 3 5 6 6 N
Total 3 6 9 12 12 Y
COMP Initial
1 2 3 4 5
Major 2 3 4 5 7 Y
Total 4 7 10 12 15 Y
Reaccred
1 2 3 4 5
Major 1 2 3 4 5 Y
Total 2 5 7 10 12 Y
CMSP Initial
1 2 3 4 5
Major 2 4 4 5 6 Y
Total 3 6 8 9 10 Y
Reaccred
1 2 3 4 5
Major 1 2 2 3 3 Y
Total 3 6 6 6 6 Y
CT Initial
1 2 3 4 5
Major 2 3 4 5 6 Y
Total 5 9 14 19 23 Y
Reaccred
1 2 3 4 5
Major 2 3 4 5 6 Y
Total 4 7 10 13 16 Y

percentile?
ETG Initial
1 2 3 4 5
Major 2 4 6 8 10 N
Total 4 8 12 16 20 N
Reaccred
1 2 3 4 5
Major 1 2 4 6 8 N
Total 3 6 9 12 15 Y
FLU Initial
1 2 3 4 5
Major 2 4 6 6 6 N
Total 3 6 9 12 15 Y
Reaccred
1 2 3 4 5
Major 2 4 6 6 6 N
Total 3 6 9 12 15 Y
HT Initial
1 2 3 4 5
Major 2 4 6 8 8 Y
Total 3 6 9 12 12 Y
Reaccred
1 2 3 4 5
Major 1 2 3 4 4 Y
Total 2 5 7 9 9 Y
MTL Initial
1 2 3 4 5+
Major 2 3 5 6 7 Y
Total 8 15 22 29 36 Y
Reaccred
1 2 3 4 5+
Major 1 2 3 4 5 Y
Total 4 8 12 16 20 Y
M&I Initial
1 2 3 4 5+
Major 2 3 5 6 7 N
Total 5 10 15 20 25 Y
Reaccred
1 2 3 4 5+
Major 2 2 3 4 5 Y
Total 3 8 11 14 18 Y

percentile?
NDT Initial
1 2 3 4 5
Major 2 4 6 8 10 Y
Total 4 8 12 16 20 Y
6 7 8 9 10
Major 12 14 16 18 20 Y
Total 24 28 32 36 40 Y
Reaccred
1 2 3 4 5
Major 1 2 3 4 5 Y
Total 3 6 9 12 15 Y
6 7 8 9 10
Major 6 7 8 9 10 Y
Total 18 21 24 27 30 Y
NMMM Initial
1 2 3 4 5
Major 1 1 2 2 2 Y
Total 3 5 7 10 12 Y
Reaccred
1 2 3 4 5
Major 1 1 2 2 2 Y
Total 2 4 5 7 9 Y
NMMT Initial
1 2 3 4 5
Major 1 1 2 2 - Y
Total 2 4 7 9 - Y
Reaccred
1 2 3 4 5
Major 1 1 2 2 - Y
Total 2 3 5 7 - Y
NM & SE Initial
1 2 3 4 5
Major 1 2 4 4 4 Y
Total 3 6 12 12 12 Y
Reaccred
1 2 3 4 5
Major 1 2 4 4 4 Y
Total 2 4 8 8 8 Y

percentile?
SEALS Initial
1 2 3 4 5
Major - 4 6 - - N
Total - 6 9 - - N
Reaccred
1 2 3 4 5
Major 4 4 6 - - N
Total 6 6 9 - - N
SLT Initial
1 2 3 4 5
Major 3 4 4 - - N
Total 6 10 10 - - N
Reaccred
1 2 3 4 5
Major 3 4 - - - N
Total 6 10 - - - N
WLD Initial
1 2 3 4 5
Major 1 2 3 3 3 Y
Total 3 5 8 8 8 Y
Reaccred
1 2 3 4 5
Major 1 2 3 3 3 Y
Total 2 4 6 6 6 Y

OP 1110 Audit Failure and Risk Mitigation

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

OP 1110 Audit Failure and Risk Mitigation

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Nadcap OPERATING PROCEDURE OP 1110

AUDIT FAILURE AND RISK MITIGATION Page 1 of 14

*To be used for audits starting on or after 04-Jul-2021*

The procedure applies to all audit types and accreditation options.

See OP 1103 for definitions.

Mode A – Auditee stops audit or fails to meet program requirements

• Auditee cancels an audit that is being conducted or is in the audit review

Mode B – Excessive Number of NCRs

Mode C – Severity of NCRs

• The Auditee has NCRs severe enough to warrant failure. Examples of

Mode D – Too Many Review Cycles

Mode E – Non-Responsiveness by Auditee

• The audit has accumulated greater than 30 days of Cumulative Response

4.3 Audits meeting any of the Modes B, C, D, or E failure criteria shall be

4.3.3 A quorum is required to ensure the Failure Ballot decision is valid.

4.3.3.1 The ballot length shall be extended as necessary to obtain quorum.

4.3.3.3 A 2/3 majority of respondents is required to fail an audit.

4.5.1 The audit status shall be set to Failed.

4.5.5 An Auditee Advisory shall be issued per OP 1109 Auditee Advisories.

4.6 Actions on audits/accreditations linked with a failed audit.

• Other actions as agreed by the Review Team

4.7 Actions for failed AC7004 audits

4.7.1.2 Any other in-process audit shall fail per Mode A.

4.8 Risk Mitigation process for failed audits

• The Auditee to document corrective actions for NCRs;

4.8.5 NCR responses shall be in accordance with OP 1106 Audit Report

4.8.6.2 A quorum is required to ensure the suspension ballot decision is valid.

4.8.6.2.1 The ballot shall be extended as necessary to obtain quorum.

4.8.6.3 A 2/3 majority of respondents is required to suspend Risk Mitigation.

4.8.6.5 The Auditee shall be notified if Risk Mitigation is suspended.

4.8.8.1 The Task Group review period may be extended if necessary.

4.9 Initial (Re-entry) Requirements for Failed Audits:

5.0 DOCUMENT REVISION HISTORY

20-Apr-2017 4.1.4.1- re-instated the requirement to document rationale for not

Note: The 20-Apr-17 version effective on-or after July 23 originally

29-Aug-2019 Supplier Advisory changed to Auditee Advisory; OP 1109 Supplier

Mode B Failure Criteria

A2.3 Each data set shall include a minimum of 32 audits.

A2.4.3 Auditor Trainees do not affect the number of audit days.

A3.6.2 OP 1111 Accreditation Length and Merit Program shall be updated as

A3.6.2.1 An enhancement request shall be submitted to update the criteria in

Task Group Mode B Failure Criteria Criteria within

Task Group Mode B Failure Criteria Criteria within

Task Group Mode B Failure Criteria Criteria within

Task Group Mode B Failure Criteria Criteria within

You might also like

To be used for audits starting on or after 04-Jul-2021