Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Page 2
Brought to you by Music Education Solutions Limited
Page 3
THE NATIONAL PLAN FOR MUSIC
EDUCATION
I believe that the government should instruct all schools that they must
deliver music as part of a broad and balanced curriculum, even if they are
academies which currently do not have to abide by the national
curriculum. This recommendation would be the single most useful
element of a new National Plan for Music Education. Most of the issues
with music education boil down to the fact that schools if they wish are
allowed to ignore it, and in many cases have felt encouraged to ignore it
due to the Ofsted inspection framework (and associated myths about it –
both of which are thankfully now changing!), and the introduction of
measures such as the EBacc and Progress 8. There is very little point
introducing a new NPME if music is not statutory in all schools.
I believe that the next most significant element that could be included in a
new NPME would be a commitment to proper training of primary teachers
in music BEFORE they enter the classroom. This was part of the original
NPME that was dropped almost immediately, which in my view was a
catastrophic error. If teachers are not trained to deliver music properly,
then unless they happen to be a musician themselves, they will be playing
catch-up for the rest of their careers. The extension role for hubs to provide
CPD for school-based staff is not an adequate substitute for proper music
training intervention in ITE. We need to ensure that all our trainee
teachers receive a proper grounding in music, and not rely on that being
addressed once they enter the classroom. Once these teachers are out in
the world, they have to jump over the barriers of finding suitable CPD, in a
suitable location, on a convenient date, at a price that they can afford, and
then request cover so that they can attend. This means that we cannot
guarantee the quality of music teaching across all our schools. CPD should
be a continuation of, not an introduction to, the music education that our
teachers receive when they are training.
It cannot be overstated how important the above issues are to the success
of music education in England. If we do not ensure that schools are
teaching music, and that teachers are properly trained to do so, we cannot
build a stable future for our sector. This makes the remaining content of a
national plan almost irrelevant, and certainly not deliverable with parity
across the country!
There are also some other issues to consider, such as why the plan does not
currently encompass the whole of young people’s education from Early
Years up to Higher Education. I would be delighted to see this as a feature
of the new plan as this would help us as a sector to make more connections
and provide more joined-up services for children & young people. In the
consultation, questions are asked about music technology, which suggests
that this might form a significant part of a new plan. If so, I hope that
consideration is given to the cost of resourcing any music technology
strand, alongside the time and budget cost of appropriate training for
music teachers not familiar with these technologies.
The consultation asks many questions about the role of Music Education
Hubs. While it is logical to use this opportunity to check how hubs are
working, it is important to remember that they are not the only form of
music education, and that the NPME is a document relevant to all music
educators. The government will need to find a more effective way to ensure
that schools in particular take ownership of this new plan, as the original
plan largely passed schools by. I still meet schools now who have no idea
that we have had a national plan for the last 8 years!
Our Music Hub system as set out in the NPME should be the icing on the
cake, not the cake itself. We cannot expect Hubs to solve all music
education’s problems. They should be free to focus on enhancing and
extending our children’s musical experiences beyond the classroom, not
picking up the pieces and replacing classroom provision. The only way to
achieve this is for the government to ensure that children are having music
lessons, delivered by competent and confident teachers, in the classroom in
the first place.
Visit this link to respond to the NPME consultation and have your say
on the future of music education in England:
https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/music-education-call-for-evidence
MUSICAL PLAY & PLAYING MUSICALLY
MUSIC IN THE EYFS AND BEYOND
Hannah Luckins
A Unique Child
Positive Relationships
Enabling Environments
Here, I hope to exemplify these principles in practice and give some ideas
of how to build upon them as children move from EYFS into Key Stage
One. This could be described as the development from ‘musical play’ to
‘playing musically.’
A Unique Child - Independent, child-initiated learning
This is really good practice for teachers in any age-range, not just in EYFS,
however we are under a great deal of pressure and restrictions in order to
achieve results and trying to fit more learning into shorter periods of time,
which makes it easier to do the opposite of what we know is best in regards
to our observations and interactions as children work independently.
EYFS teachers will be very familiar with the age-old debate about timely
intervention in children’s independent play in order to move learning
forward. A phrase coined and expanded upon by Julie Fisher in her 2016
book Interacting or Interfering? Improving Interactions in Early Years. This
is a good reminder for teachers to take a step back and observe what is
being investigated by the child by themselves at first, and how they are
organizing their own learning and challenge, before jumping in with a
question/ a wonder/ an encouragement to promote independent
progression. Then… How do we ensure our timely interactions bring value
to the child’s own learning journey?
I have found it can be a great tool to simply join in with the music they are
making. Everyone then has fun with musical play!
Call and Response with the child (using short, simple melodic or
rhythmic phrases) – the child will feel like the teacher!
Modelling language and movements e.g. “I like your music, it’s so fast
it makes me want to dance” (then dance!)
Wondering rather than firing questions e.g. “I wonder how your music
will end?” – again, giving great value to the child’s unique response,
without the need for a verbal or definitive answer as they children
continue to explore possibilities in their musical play.
Mantle of the expert - Can you play with/ teach your ‘song’ to a
partner? Children love to play teachers, and this helps them to unpick
and accurately describe/ demonstrate their own work in the process.
For musical play to happen, the whole environment needs to celebrate and
normalise music play and exploration. This can be the physical
environment – making space to listen and try out instruments as much as
any other classroom item (glue sticks, construction materials, reading
books etc.) Or indeed the implicit environment (how children are
encouraged to have a go, to learn from mistakes, to celebrate their own and
others achievements etc.)
Transition to Year 1
Continuing the mindset and provision for musical play into a Key Stage
One or even a Key Stage Two classroom environment and daily routines is
easier than you may think. There are so many possibilities, including but
not limited to: daily singing/chanting (this can be during counting or
phonics or any area of learning to embed key facts), clapping to gain
children’s attention, listening to music during independent tasks/reading/
tidy up time etc. These do not cover the music curriculum but do set the
tone for successful music learning and musical children, whereby elements
of music feel embedded and understood through experiences, and the
attitudes of the children to music are positive and enthusiastic. Classroom
music lessons have historically been too quick to make children ‘fit a mold’
and therefore the children who don’t or can’t ‘fit’ as quickly as others are
sadly soon put off.
Musical play is the building block upon which playing musically begins to
be built. It develops children’s awareness of expression and story-telling in
their musical performances and compositions, as well as in their aural
awareness. I endeavor to leave plenty of room for musical exploration (play)
in all lessons, whether they be in the classroom or in my individual
instrumental teaching. A friend and colleague of mine who teaches harp at
Eastman Community Music School, often uses the phrase ‘comprovising’
which perfectly describes that sweet-spot between musical play
(improvising) and composition (writing music for a purpose), which is
rarely distinguished as separate entities in Early Years settings, and need
not be in Primary classrooms either.
This might all sound very daunting. How can “serious structural
deficiencies” possibly be overcome? What can any of us as individuals or
organisations do to make things better?
Here are Sound and Music, we’ve been thinking about the first steps…
We’ve already talked about the changes that are needed at a policy level;
our Chief Executive Susanna Eastburn MBE gave a brilliant keynote speech
at the Music Mark conference in November 2019 on this topic.
Also at the Music Mark conference, I ran a session for delegates that spent
some time exploring how the music education sector might better support
young composers. It was interesting to hear from colleagues on how the
three outcomes above might be addressed and, although groups of
delegates were thinking about how to support young people with a range of
different musical interests and approaches, there were clearly some
common themes emerging from the ideas and experience in the room.
We’ve taken the emerging themes from both sources to draft some guiding
principles, shaped by the needs and interests of young people themselves.
Principles for Composing in Music Education:
We need to talk to young people to find out what their musical intentions
are, what music do they want to compose? Where, how, and who with? This
will ensure that young people are engaged and connected with the music they
are creating, enabling them to develop their musical voices and shape their
own musical journeys.
Young people should receive support and guidance from at least one
educator (who might be a teacher, a mentor, an industry specialist or a
professional composer) who has the skills and expertise to support their
creative learning, and knowledge of possible progression routes. This will
mean that young people can learn, acquire new musical and cognitive skills
and find their own, personal progression pathways.
Young people should be able to connect with other young composers and
performers. This will mean that young composers and music creators have a
peer group to create music with and don’t feel isolated.
Young people should have access to the resources they need including live
musicians, software, recording studios and assistive technology. This is
because young people need the tools to create and share their music.
The development of creative music skills should start early as part of the
curriculum in early years and primary schools. This will mean that children’s
natural creativity is nurtured, and they experience all the positive effects that
our respondents identified.
Dive Deeper into Music
Research of music teaching repeatedly demonstrates that many primary school teachers feel under
confident to teach music. This is unsurprising when we consider that trainee teachers receive a
pitiful amount of input relating to music teaching within their training year – if any at all.
However, music is a compulsory subject in the National Curriculum, which still applies in the
majority of primary schools in England, and is integral to the ‘broad and balanced’ curriculum that
Ofsted are clear they want to see. We have a clear mandate from the government that this means it
should be taught regularly as part of the curriculum.
In a bid to help primary school teachers to better understand what music teaching is and how it
could be utilised even more to bring the primary curriculum to life, the ISM Trust, supported by
the Schools Music Association (SMA), commissioned the development of a Primary Music Toolkit.
The point of the toolkit is to explore ideas about what musical learning is and how teachers can
gain confidence to lead inspiring musical experiences. It is packed with practical help, such as how
to set up a classroom and ways to get musical instruments in and out, along with strategies to get
attention back to you in a busy and productively noisy room, how to encourage creative
exploration on instruments and technologies and strategies for teaching a song.
It absolutely isn’t about reinventing the wheel – it signposts a variety of other resources and ideas
and does not promote one style or method of music education over another. Instead, it is about
promoting sound (pardon the pun) pedagogical ideas that can help teachers to plan inspiring
music education. The toolkit sits alongside the guidance on planning, assessment and progression
authored by Ally Daubney and Martin Fautley and freely downloadable from
ismtrust.org/resources
The singing part of the toolkit is written collaboratively with Sing Up, the award-winning
organisation with a wealth of experience in leading singing in primary schools across the country.
At every music education event that I go to, and almost every time I open
Twitter, someone is complaining that ‘most primary schools don’t teach
music.’ As someone who spent three years of their life as a researcher, this
immediately concerns me as I know that there is as yet no empirical
evidence to support this theory. There is plenty of anecdotal evidence
about schools who don’t teach music, but there are no underlying reliable
nationwide figures to ‘prove’ that this is the majority of schools.
I also hear regularly the cry of alarm ‘most schools don’t even have a music
specialist’ as if this were a bad thing. However, not having a music
specialist does not mean music is not being taught, or that it is not being
taught well. And conversely, having a music specialist does not necessarily
mean that music is being taught well, since there is no agreed set of
criteria to become a ‘music specialist’ beyond simply calling yourself one.
Even if you have a great music specialist, this is not the most sustainable
model for music teaching. It relies on the budget to pay for this specialist
teaching being available every year, and it also results in the rest of the staff
becoming de-skilled with teaching music. If the budget is squeezed too far
not only do you lose your specialist provision, but also you don’t have the
skills to replace it in-house. So ‘not having a music specialist’ might
actually be a good thing if you have committed and enthusiastic class
teachers including music in their timetable instead.
I think what I find most disturbing about the above suppositions is that
they are often delivered in a tone which suggests that schools are somehow
at fault for ‘not teaching music.’ However, it is important to remember that
schools don’t ‘avoid’ teaching music out of malice, or a desire to harm our
children’s education! There are two key external factors which have caused
some schools to abandon music teaching.
It is well-known and often discussed that the majority (and in this case
there is empirical evidence to support that claim) of Initial Teacher
By Dr Elizabeth Stafford
Director, Music Education Solutions
Education / Training provision does not provide adequate support for the
development of music teaching skills. Therefore, through no fault of their
own, the majority of NQTs begin their careers without the skills or
confidence to teach music, joining the ranks of seasoned teachers at their
schools who also lack those skills and confidence as they came through the
same system! And so the problem perpetuates! There is at present no
national agreed provision or plan for in-service teacher training, therefore
it is up to individual teachers and schools to decide whether or not to
source training for music teaching, which relies on availability, budget, and
time. (I should point out that the lack of adequate music provision in ITE /
ITT is similarly nothing to do with providers’ desire to harm children’s
education, but has everything to do with the next issue that we will
discuss below).
For years, Ofsted and the DfE have driven schools into the position of
prioritising ‘core’ subjects at the expense of all other subjects, through
inspection foci, league tables, SATs data and so on. In 2013 Ofsted
attempted to palm off the responsibility for curriculum music onto hubs,
after successive triennial music reports showed no improvement in the
teaching of music. Unsurprisingly there was an outcry, but gradually
hubs, with the support of ACE began to attempt this role, despite it not
being in their original remit. However, despite hubs’ best efforts, the
rumblings about schools not teaching music or ‘not engaging’ with their
hubs continued. Of course, this was entirely predictable, as it is not a
statutory requirement for schools to ‘engage’ with their music education
hub (nor should it be). In addition, schools were already being sent the
message directly from the DfE and Ofsted (intentionally or not) that
music was ‘not important’ in comparison to the core subjects, thereby
undermining the work of the hubs.
As keen as I was for inspectors to see and experience the quality of music
provision within our school, I still experienced a moment of nerves when
I learned that I would take part in my first music deep dive as part of our
school’s inspection at the beginning of December.
When we are preparing for inspection, we can often feel that inspectors
will want to talk to us about what we are doing as curriculum leads. Now
that I’ve been through the process, I realise that inspectors want to listen,
to look and to learn so that they gain the evidence they need to help give
them a clear and accurate picture of what is happening for pupils, for ALL
pupils, as part of the curriculum provision for music across the school. It’s
good if you are ready to talk about this.
Each deep dive includes a discussion with the subject lead, lesson visits,
discussion with pupils, discussion with teachers in lessons seen (which in
this case was just me!), and evidence of pupils’ learning.
As I was teaching at the very start of the day, I was observed teaching
music before I had my more detailed discussion with the inspector.
(Normally this meeting would take place before lesson visits, but the
organisation of my own timetable meant we had to work around this.) Just
before the pupils arrived, I had a short conversation with the inspector who
asked ‘why this lesson now?’. This gave me an immediate opportunity to
explain the learning that had led us to today’s lesson, the outcomes I was
expecting from this lesson and how this would lead to the learning in the
next lesson. The inspector was then able to see in practice what we had just
discussed.
Later that morning, I met with the inspector as the Music Lead. I took with
me all the documents and evidence I wanted to share of pupils learning,
curriculum planning and approaches to assessment.
To begin with, we talked around the curriculum for music at our school and
how this had been developed, building on the expectations of the National
Curriculum for music. This is something we had been working on over a
number of years at our school; our plans show how knowledge and skills are
sequenced so that, over time, all pupils develop a deeper knowledge and
understanding of music and can apply their knowledge and skills in
increasingly demanding contexts.
I spoke about our three weekly singing assemblies (I lead sessions for
Years 1 & 2, for 3 & 4, and for 5 & 6) and how these are also planned with
progression, applying taught skills to extend musical experience within a
larger group. I explained how these sessions lead to our annual ‘Big Sing’
event which involves every pupil in the school from Reception to Year 6.
We talked about the importance of participation in music to support
pupils’ self-discipline, teamwork and resilience, and how musical
performance helps prepare pupils for managing situations when they
find themselves beyond their comfort zone. Our two choirs, which
rehearse beyond the school day, are open to any child in years 3-6 who
wants to take part and develop their skills - for anyone who just wants to
sing more!
I was asked about the instrumental lesson timetables that the inspector
had seen on the music room notice board. We spoke about the numbers
of pupils who participate in lessons (60% of pupils in Key Stage 2), about
the proportion of disadvantaged pupils and those who have special
educational needs and disabilities who take part in individual or group
instrumental lessons, and the level of financial support provided for this
through additional funding such as the pupil premium. We also have a
band in school which we established to extend the experience of pupils
pupils who are interested in music and for those pupils for whom there
are barriers to wider participation in music outside school. I was also able
to talk about how our curriculum provides stretch and challenge for pu-
pils whose involvement in and enthusiasm for music means that they are
already more advanced in some aspects of music learning than their
peers.
After lunch, the inspector returned to observe a lesson with Year 5. This
time the pupils were mostly working creatively in small groups; the
inspector spent some time talking with the children about their musical
learning. She also spoke to a group of these pupils back in their classroom
following this lesson about their experience of music at our school.
Later in the day I met again with the inspector to discuss what she had
observed in lessons. ‘Why this lesson now?’ was a key aspect of our
discussion. We also picked up on other observations she had made in
lessons. At our school class teachers are always present in lessons. This is a
strategic decision by school leaders and the inspector asked me about the
value of this. The reason for this is that we value the opportunity that
class teachers have to observe their pupils in a different setting, being
taught by another practitioner; working together to support the pupils
(plans shared and discussed with teachers to develop teachers’ own
professional understanding of music as a curriculum subject) helps
provide a coherent experience for pupils. It also supports what we call
‘curriculum connectedness’ - relating the teaching of music more widely
to other curriculum areas. We are also keen on developing the musical
skills and experience of the class teachers so that music is also happening
in classrooms - not just in music lessons.
Enabling every pupil to access music and being open and creative in
making this a reality has always been a priority. In bringing this into
discussion I was reassured by the inspector that evidence of this was there
‘in bucket loads’. I didn’t need to talk further. If we make it happen, it’s a
normal part of what we do - the evidence is there!
At the end of the deep dive I reflected that the experience was very
positive. I felt that I had been given the opportunity to talk about all of
the aspects of music in our school with an inspector who engaged with
me and with the pupils in a way that demonstrated real professional
curiosity.
Be ready to talk about the part music plays in the culture of the
school and pupils’ personal development.
Inspectors need to see evidence for what you are telling them. It’s
useful to have examples at your fingertips; case studies that you can
talk through, planning documents, examples of pupils’ work. If
you’ve asked for pupils’ feedback or comments about music learning
in school that’s also helpful.
Whose cultural capital is it anyway?
Why not look at Miles Davis and Ella Fitzgerald from the Jazz tradition?
Explore Stephen Sondheim and Lin Manuel Miranda’s work in musical
theatre? Consider the country music of Willie Nelson and Dolly Parton?
Even Ed Sheeran and Gary Barlow could be said to be some of the ‘great
composers’ of the pop music tradition. And of course no debate about
the value of music education these days is complete without a reference
to ‘child of grime’ Stormzy! There are a myriad of options to explore
beyond the confines of the Western Classical tradition.
Songs of Home is a
collection of folk songs
from around the world,
created to celebrate the
25th anniversary of the
Voices Foundation. This
free resource was designed
with a specific focus on
accessibility and simplicity
without compromising on
quality. The resource has
been celebrated by
non-specialist teachers
and specialist music
educators alike, and has
been used in
educational settings from
early years to Key Stage 3.
The downloadable pack
includes lyrics, basic
notation for voice and
piano, song descriptions,
lesson ideas, and MP3
audio files. To date, Songs
of Home has been
accessed by over 750
teachers and leaders
across 35 countries
worldwide.
Music belongs to everybody
When we developed Songs of Home, we set out to collect ten songs from
around the world that would address the repertoire challenge whilst
inspiring a generation of children. These songs needed to be simple and
accessible, but rich in quality and teachable content. Using folk songs to
achieve this was the natural choice as their simple language, short forms,
and often pentatonic style give them an immediacy and familiarity which
make them approachable from the start.
After much deliberation and testing, we identified nine folk songs that we
felt captured these characteristics. As suggested by the title of the
resource, the lyrics in each of these songs focus on one central theme:
‘home’. The tenth and final piece in the pack, ‘Song of Until’, is an original
song written by award-winning composer, David Bruce with lyrics by Glyn
Maxwell. This song was commissioned by Voices Foundation in
collaboration with children and schools to act as a ‘folksong of our time’.
Together, these songs reinforce the idea that ‘Music belongs to everybody’,
a core educational principle of Zoltan Kodály, whose philosophy inspires
much of Voices Foundation’s work.
The ten folk songs in the pack originate from countries including Japan,
Ghana, Brazil, Lebanon and Africa, exploring languages including Twi,
Portuguese, Hebrew and Polish. Engaging with music from around the
world is an enjoyable way for children to build an understanding of the
similarities and differences between communities and their traditions.
Focusing on the idea of ‘home’ can open up discussions of what ‘home’
means for each child and how this is celebrated across the world.
The impact of Songs of Home is far greater than we could ever have
imagined. The pack has been downloaded by 750+ individuals in 35
countries across the globe. We’ve seen downloads in 6 of the 7 continents
(still waiting on Antarctica!) and have subsequently been nominated for
the 2020 Music & Drama Education Awards in the 'Outstanding Music
Education Resource' category.
Next Steps
By offering a high quality resource to the public for free, Songs of Home has
helped non-music specialist teachers and music practitioners to lead and
programme choral performances in their schools that highlight the
importance of cultural exchange and the role of folksong in music
education. This resource will remain free to download for the foreseeable
future and we hope its reach continues to grow. Download the pack using
this link.
Voices Foundation has over 25 years of experience working
side-by-side with teachers to help them to develop the
confidence and skills to lead classroom music through sing-
ing. Through the process of intensive teacher development,
their programmes enable schools to embed music into school
life, and act as an agent for whole school improvement. To
learn more about Voices Foundation and the programmes
they offer, visit their website.
Interview: Susie Riddell
The Archers’ star talks about how experiencing music at a
young age has influenced her life and career.
I suppose my earliest musical memory would be of my mum singing to
me at night. She sang nursery rhymes, Scottish folk songs, and Girl Guide
camp fire songs to me throughout my childhood and teens. And into
adulthood really. If I was unwell or upset, mum’s soothing night time
songs were guaranteed to cheer me up and, even better, send me to sleep!
I now sing every night to my own children.
I also have strong memories of my primary school hall and the percussion
trolley! We had a lovely music teacher and our lessons were fun. There
were the obligatory recorder lessons of course – I actually still remember
one of the tunes we learned!
Grove House
Coombswood Court As well as publishing Primary Music Magazine, we also offer training and
Steel Park Road
development opportunities for teachers worldwide, either live or online. Visit
Halesowen
our website to find out more about the courses and qualifications that we
Phone:07570455887 offer, and how we can support your school to become even better at deliver-
Email: liz@musiceducationsolutions.co.uk
ing music education!
Our next issue 4.2 is out in June 2020 — see you then!