Professional Documents
Culture Documents
IFRS committee follows a thorough, transparent and participatory due process when we issue
an IFRS Standard. Standard-setting entails are as follows:
i) Agenda Consultation: Every five years, the Board conducts a comprehensive review
and consultation to define international standard-setting priorities and develop its project
work plan. The Board can also add topics to its work plan if necessary between agenda
consultations. This can include topics following Post-implementation Reviews of Standards;
the IFRS Interpretations Committee may also request the Board review an issue.
ii) Research Program: We begin most projects with research—explore the issues,
identify possible solutions and decide whether standard-setting is required. Often, we set out
our ideas in a discussion paper and seek public comment. If we find sufficient evidence that
an accounting problem exists, the problem is sufficiently important to warrant changing a
Standard or issuing a new one and a practical solution can be found, we begin standard-
setting.
iii) Standard Setting Program: If the Board decides to amend a Standard or issue a new
one, we generally review the research, including comments on the discussion paper, and
propose amendments or Standards to resolve issues identified through research and
consultation. Proposals for a new Standard or an amendment to a Standard are published in
an exposure draft for public consultation. To gather additional evidence, members of the
Board and IFRS Foundation technical staff consult with a range of stakeholders from all over
the world. The Board analyses feedback and refines proposals before the new Standard, or an
amendment to a Standard, is issued.
iv) Maintenance Program: The work doesn’t stop once a Standard is issued. We also
support implementation of the Standards and we make sure we maintain them. This process
includes consulting on the implementation of a new or amended Standard to identify any
implementation problems that may need to be addressed. If issues arise, the IFRS
Interpretations Committee may decide to create an IFRIC Interpretation of the Standard or
recommend a narrow-scope amendment. Such amendments follow the Board's normal due
process.
v) Post-implementation Reviews: After a new Standard has been in use for a few years,
the Board carries out research through a Post-implementation Review to assess whether the
Standard is achieving its objective and, if not, whether any amendments should be
considered. As a result of the Post-implementation Review, the Board may start a new
research project.
Technically they are the same. IFRS is the current set of standards that is reflective of the
changes in the accounting and business practices over the last two decades. IAS is what used
to be prior to the introduction of IFRS. However, not all of the IAS are outdated. In fact, to
date there are only 9 IFRS issued and the IAS that were not superseded by the IFRS are still
in use. The IASB no longer issues IAS. Any future standards will now be called IFRS, and if
they are contradictory to existing IAS, the IFRS will be followed. The key different points of
IAS and IFRS as follows:
• IAS stands for International Accounting Standards, while IFRS refers to International
Financial Reporting Standards.
• IAS standards were published between 1973 and 2001, while IFRS standards were
published from 2001 onwards.
• IAS standards were issued by the IASC, while the IFRS are issued by the IASB,
which succeeded the IASC.
Principles of the IFRS take precedence if there’s contradiction with those of the IAS, and this
result in the IAS principles being dropped.
12. Steps of IASB Due process
Outlined below, in overview terms, are the due process steps followed in the IASB's
standardlevel projects, i.e. proposed new standards, and amendments to existing standards,
and Interpretations developed by the IFRS Interpretations Committee (and ratified by the
IASB). These steps are:
i) Research program: The IASB's research program involves the analysis of possible
financial reporting problems by collecting evidence on the nature and extent of the perceived
shortcoming and assessing potential ways to improve financial reporting or to remedy a
deficiency. Also includes the consideration of broader financial reporting issues, such as how
financial reporting is evolving, to encourage international debate on financial reporting
matters.
ii) Developing a proposal for publication: Once the IASB has formally decided to add
a project to its agenda, it proceeds to the development of an exposure draft. The exposure
draft is issued for public consultation and the IASB may also undertake additional outreach
activities such as meetings, discussion forums, webcasts and podcasts and roundtable
meetings.
iii) Re-deliberations and finalization: After the publication of an exposure draft, the
IASB proceed to consider constituent feedback from the consultative process. In some cases,
the IASB may decide to re-expose proposals before proceeding to a finalized pronouncement.
Once deliberations have been finalized, the IASB's technical staff will prepare the final
standard for balloting and voting on by the Board. The process may also include the issue of
a 'review draft' of the final pronouncement prior to it being finalized. These documents are
not part of formal due process but have the purpose of allowing a 'fatal flaw' review.
Adopted(IFRS 16 16
16 Lease 1 January 2016
replaces IAS-17)
Adopted 17
(Mandatory
17 Insurance Contracts 18 May 2017
effective date of
annual periods
beginning on or
after 1 January
2021).
Reference: