The rubric provides criteria for evaluating analytical essays across four categories: Idea, Argumentation, Originality, and Organization and Writing. Within each category, criteria are outlined for work that is Excellent, Proficient, Fair, or Inadequate. An excellent essay would have a clear and debatable thesis, strong and logical argumentation, original ideas, clear organization and minimal errors. A fair essay may have an unclear idea or argument issues, while an inadequate essay lacks argument or organization.
The rubric provides criteria for evaluating analytical essays across four categories: Idea, Argumentation, Originality, and Organization and Writing. Within each category, criteria are outlined for work that is Excellent, Proficient, Fair, or Inadequate. An excellent essay would have a clear and debatable thesis, strong and logical argumentation, original ideas, clear organization and minimal errors. A fair essay may have an unclear idea or argument issues, while an inadequate essay lacks argument or organization.
The rubric provides criteria for evaluating analytical essays across four categories: Idea, Argumentation, Originality, and Organization and Writing. Within each category, criteria are outlined for work that is Excellent, Proficient, Fair, or Inadequate. An excellent essay would have a clear and debatable thesis, strong and logical argumentation, original ideas, clear organization and minimal errors. A fair essay may have an unclear idea or argument issues, while an inadequate essay lacks argument or organization.
Idea is unclear, Idea is debatable and it takes Idea is and clearly work for the debatable and presented in the reader to fish it is evident in the There is no Idea opening and out of the text. argument, but is evident in the concluding Or, thesis is 25% not clearly Idea. sections of the self-evident stated. paper. and not debatable. Argument is Argument is presented clearly presented Argument is and logically. clearly and rambling, and Logical points logically, but there are build directly upon points do not There is no contradictions the thesis and necessarily discernable left prior points. build on each argument, or no Argumentation unaddressed. Counter- other. Counter alternative 15% Counter arguments are arguments are interpretation is arguments may addressed, addressed, but presented. be presented, dismantled, and many are left but are left folded into the hanging or are unaddressed. main argument of dealt with the paper. inadequately. Argument is Argument is original and Argument is expository creative. Goes strong and rather than substantially interesting, but analytical. beyond points plays it safe and Concepts are Argument is raised in lecture does not push Originality described, but boring, weak and and readings. boundaries. dealt with incoherent. 15% Concepts are Concepts are separately and related to each put in not explicitly other in conversation related to each interesting and with each other. other. creative ways. Clear organization Clear with a natural organization, Organization is flow. Includes an with unclear or introduction, introduction, without Little discernable transition transitions and necessary organization. sentences to conclusion, but component Significant connect major writing is not parts. grammar and Organization and ideas, and always fluid. Significant spelling errors. Writing conclusion. There are grammar or Ideas and 15% There are few or several spelling errors evidence are not no grammar or grammar or (but not both). correctly cited, or spelling errors. spelling errors. Ideas and not cited at all. Minimal passive Ideas and evidence are voice. Ideas and evidence are correctly cited. evidence are correctly cited. correctly cited. Each logical point is backed Each logical point up by one or is backed up by more examples. one or more Evidence examples. advances the A few pieces of Evidence is Several points argument, but it evidence are strong and of the argument may not be thrown in here or sufficient to are left without Use of Evidence sufficient. there, but not advance the evidence. 15% Potential used to defend argument. Evidence is counter- the main Potential counter- insufficient. arguments are argument. arguments are accounted for, accounted for and but may not be addressed with sufficiently evidence. addressed with evidence. Demonstrates solid Concepts are Course understanding of defined, but the readings are the major themes Paper mentions author does not used. of the course, course readings, demonstrate a Concepts are Application of using readings but there is little solid left undefined, Readings / and lectures to demonstration of understanding or poorly Concepts / Visual define concepts. how the paper of the major defined. Little Argument is relates to the 15% themes of the broader placed within the course. course relevant framework is broad discussions to the argument. used. outlined in the course.