The document is a rubric for evaluating literature reviews, synthesis papers, and policy reviews. It contains 5 criteria for evaluation: Content, Organization, Relevance, and References. Each criteria is scored on a scale from Excellent to Needs Improvement. The rubric provides descriptions of the level of content, organization, relevance to title, and referencing expected to meet each score.
The document is a rubric for evaluating literature reviews, synthesis papers, and policy reviews. It contains 5 criteria for evaluation: Content, Organization, Relevance, and References. Each criteria is scored on a scale from Excellent to Needs Improvement. The rubric provides descriptions of the level of content, organization, relevance to title, and referencing expected to meet each score.
The document is a rubric for evaluating literature reviews, synthesis papers, and policy reviews. It contains 5 criteria for evaluation: Content, Organization, Relevance, and References. Each criteria is scored on a scale from Excellent to Needs Improvement. The rubric provides descriptions of the level of content, organization, relevance to title, and referencing expected to meet each score.
Based on study of Biclar, Lachica , Virtudazo, & Latoza ( 2018) Indigenous
Knowledge Systems and Practices (IKSP) are critical to the physical, socioeconomic, and cultural ecosystem's equilibrium. Frameworks in the operation of human interaction and adaptability to the environment will be affected if it is not provided.
RUBRICS FOR REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE/SYNTHESIS PAPER/POLICY
REVIEW Excellent (20 Very Satisfactory Satisfactory (10 Needs Points points) (15 points) points) Improvement (5 Points) The appropriate All major sections All major sections Major sections content is of the content are of the content are of pertinent covered in depth included, but not included, but content have Content without covered in as not covered in been being much as much depth, omitted or redundant. depth, or as or as explicit, greatly run-on; Sources are cited explicit, as as expected; not not all when specific all sources are expected. statements are cited when Sources are sources are cited made. when specific specific cited when statements are statements are specific made. made. statements are made.
Clear sense of May lack a Logic of
Organizati order. Begins thesis sentence, argument is Lacks clear with a thesis or but points are minimally on organizational topic sentence. presented in a perceivable. Points presented in a plan. Reader Supporting logical is confused. points are seemingly random progression. presented in a fashion, but all logical support argument. progression.
There is one There is one
Relevance clear, well clear, well There is one The topic and focused focused topic. to the topic. main ideas are topic. Main Main ideas are Title clear but are not Main ideas are not clear. ideas are clear somewhat clear. and are well well supported supported by by detailed detailed and accurate information. information.
All citations The majority of Citations and Citations
Reference and citations and references are not and references references are references are presented in are not s presented in presented in proper format, and presented in proper format proper are in need of proper format and do not need format, and are in moderate revision. and need revision. need of minor significant revision. revision.