Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/223990198
CITATIONS READS
17 113
10 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Alasdair J Gibb on 18 November 2015.
1
To whom correspondence should be addressed at Toxicology & Environmental Research and Consulting, The Dow Chemical Company, 1803 Building, Midland,
MI 48674. Fax: (989) 638-9863. E-mail: rrasoulpour@dow.com.
the fetal muscle nAChR during late fetal development. Key Rat cross-fostering study. In the cross-fostering study, groups of 32
events were identified in this mode-of-action (MoA), and the female rats were given diets supplying 0 or 1000 ppm sulfoxaflor. The females
were treated for 2 weeks prior to breeding, continuing through breeding,
relevance of the effects to humans was investigated. gestation, and lactation. Mated females were subdivided into two groups,
namely foster and donor dams. The control or sulfoxaflor-treated foster dams
were allowed to deliver live offspring, which were removed as soon as possible
after completion of parturition. Concurrently, control or sulfoxaflor-treated
MATERIALS AND METHODS donor dams underwent cesarean section on GD 21. The newly delivered pups
were tattooed to identify litter of origin and immediately transferred to the
Test Material appropriate foster dams.
Sulfoxaflor (X11422208; CAS 946578-00-3; purity 95.6%) was provided by Two male and two female fetuses from each donor litter obtained via
Dow AgroSciences, LLC (Indianapolis, Indiana). For rabbit studies, sulfoxaflor cesarean section were cross-fostered to a control dam and an sulfoxaflor-treated
was mixed with ground feed and 0.5% apple flavoring, then formed into pellets dam, both of which had delivered previously and were lactating. Thus, after
by PMI Nutritional International, LLC (St Louis, MO). For rat studies, cross-fostering was completed, each control and sulfoxaflor-treated lactating
sulfoxaflor was mixed with ground feed and fed in meal form. All diets were foster dam had mixed litters comprised of two male and two female pups that
prepared as fixed percent of test material in the feed. The stability and originated from control and two male and two female pups that originated from
homogeneity of sulfoxaflor in the feed were confirmed by analytical methods. sulfoxaflor-treated foster dams (total foster litter size of eight). This design
controlled for litter of origin effects and enabled comparison of the survival of
Animals pups exposed to sulfoxaflor during gestation alone or during lactation alone
nuclease-free water at a final concentration of 0.5 mg/ml and stored at 80C indices, and pregnancy rate were analyzed by the Fisher exact probability test
prior to use. with Bonferroni’s correction. Survival index, pre- and post-implantation loss,
and fetal alterations were analyzed using the litter as the experimental unit by
Functional expression of rat and human nAChRs in Xenopus the censored Wilcoxon test as modified by Haseman and Hoel with
oocytes. Two-electrode voltage-clamp recording from Xenopus oocytes was
Bonferroni’s correction. Gestation survival index ¼ % delivered pups alive
performed 1–5 days after microinjection with cDNA or cRNA. Oocytes were at birth. Nonpregnant females, females with resorptions only, females found to
placed in a recording chamber and continuously perfused with saline solution be pregnant after staining of their uteri, females lacking visible implantations,
(115mM NaCl, 2.5mM KCl, 1.8mM CaCl2, 10mM 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)- or females not delivering a litter were excluded from the appropriate analyses.
1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid, pH 7.3 with NaOH, 235 mOsm). Known
All analyses were two sided with alpha ¼ 0.05 unless stated otherwise.
agonists or sulfoxaflor were applied using a computer-controlled perfusion
system (BPS-8; ALA Scientific Inc., Westbury, NY). Two-electrode voltage-
clamp recording was performed using two microelectrodes filled with 3M KCl,
and oocytes voltage clamped at 60 mV using an Axon Geneclamp 500B RESULTS
amplifier (Molecular Devices, Winnersh, U.K.). Membrane currents were
digitized and stored on computer disk using pClamp software (Molecular
Results of the developmental and reproductive toxicity
Devices).
studies are summarized in Table 1. In the rat reproduction/
Neonatal Rat Hemidiaphragm Contracture Assays developmental toxicity probe study (according to the OECD
In this assay, sulfoxaflor was evaluated for its ability to induce skeletal 421 guideline), dams given 1000 ppm (78 mg/kg/day)
muscle contracture of the diaphragm. Isolated phrenic nerve-hemidiaphragm sulfoxaflor lost 93% of their offspring between birth and
Study type (guideline) Doses NOAEL LOAEL Target organ/principal effects at LOAEL
Reproduction/developmental probe in rats 0, 100, 500, 1000 ppm Reproduction: 100 ppm (8.1 mkd) Reproduction: Reproduction: 500 ppm-Decreased neonatal
(OECD 421) 500 ppm (39.5 mkd) survival. PND 4 survival 81.2% (95.4% in
controls). 1000 ppm-PND 4 pup survival
7.3%.
Parental: 100 ppm (8.1 mkd) Parental: 500 ppm Parental toxicity: Decreased body weight
(39.5 mkd) gain at 500 and 1000 ppm in males and
females. Increased liver weight in males at
500 and 1000 ppm. Hepatocellular
hypertrophy in males at 500 and 1000 ppm
and females at 1000 ppm.
525
Downloaded from http://toxsci.oxfordjournals.org/ by guest on November 15, 2015
526 RASOULPOUR ET AL.
TABLE 2
Neonatal Offspring Limb and Clavicle Abnormalities Resulting From Sulfoxaflor (X11422208) Exposure
Notes. D, dam; F, fetus; L, litter; N/A, not applicable; P, pup; TMI, test material intake; LD, lactation day.
a
Three of the four sampled rats had undergone parturition prior to blood collection.
b
A severe, > 90 persistent flexure at the wrist or any flexure that cannot straighten.
c
Evaluated in surviving pups on PND 0.
d
Evaluated in surviving pups on PND 4.
TABLE 3
Neonatal Offspring Death Resulting From Sulfoxaflor (X11422208) Exposure
Two-generation reproduction 10 weeks prior to breeding-PND 21 400 29.2 15.9 (LD 4) 4.5
(two generations)
Reproduction screening 2 weeks prior to breeding-PND 21 500 30.3 N/A 18.8
Critical window 2 GD 20–22/LD 0 1000 35.7 5.41–16.1a 10.4
Critical window 1 GD 16–birth 1000 38.6 32.1–43.2 (GD 21) 53.1
Reproduction screening (OECD 421) 2 weeks prior to breeding-PND 21 1000 62.0 14.3–41.9 (LD 4) 92.7
abnormalities, whereas groups 3 and 4 had no observed effects other test compounds such as caffeine (Collins et al., 1987)
et al., 2007). Comparison of the amino acid sequence of the rat respiratory muscle (including impairment) to pharmacological
and human c subunit revealed that although the two subunits test materials (e.g., muscle relaxant drugs used in surgery)
are similar (approximately 90% identical), they contain 53 (Bowman, 1990; Fortier et al., 2001; Gibb and Marshall,
amino acid differences (Supplementary fig. 1). Given the 1986, 1987). The phrenic nerve-hemidiaphragm experiments
precedent that one or two amino acid differences can confer conducted with sulfoxaflor demonstrated a consistent concen-
species-selective agonist activity upon nicotinic ligands, it tration-dependent contracture of the fetal-type diaphragm
seems entirely plausible that the differences in agonist activity muscle with prolonged application of sulfoxaflor causing
of sulfoxaflor can be explained by differences in the amino acid a sustained muscle contracture. These experiments additionally
sequence of the rat and human nAChR c subunits. The c and e demonstrated clear specificity as the contracture was com-
subunits show even greater sequence differences that the pletely reversible upon removal of sulfoxaflor. In addition, the
human and rat c subunit (even from the same species). sulfoxaflor-induced contracture was blocked by coexposure
Supplementary figure 2 shows an alignment of the c and e with the highly selective muscle-type nAChR antagonist,
subunits from rat. These subunits share only about 50% tubocurarine (Wenningmann and Dilger, 2001), showing that
identity in amino acid sequence. To date, there have been no the contracture induced by sulfoxaflor is mediated via muscle
reports of the molecular cloning of nAChR subunits from nAChR activation, rather than a separate mechanism (more
rabbit; therefore, sequence alignment in this species is not specifically, a postreceptor mechanism).
lowest-observed-effect level [LOEL]). Nor were there any revealed that (1) sulfoxaflor exposure in rats just prior to birth
neuronal nAChR–mediated clinical signs in dietary neurotox- was sufficient to induce the effects, (2) exposure throughout
icity studies. organogenesis (GD 6–15) did not cause the effects, (3) the
In considering a possible neuronal nAChR agonist effect, the effects are consistent with a pharmacological MoA, which is
profile of toxicity with studies using agonists to these receptors coincident with establishment of a functional fetal muscle
was examined. Nicotine, the archetypal neuronal nAChR nAChR and fetal limb movement, (4) sulfoxaflor is an agonist
agonist, is a full agonist of the most widespread neuronal to neonatal rat diaphragm muscle via the fetal-type muscle
nAChR (a4b2) and does not cause the same neonatal effects as nAChR, (5) the rat fetal abnormalities are reversible transient
sulfoxaflor. In addition, sulfoxaflor does not cause effects on alterations that completely resolve in surviving pups by PND
the fetal lung, which is a known outcome of neuronal nAChR 4, and (6) that sulfoxaflor is an agonist at the rat fetal muscle-
activation (Kobayashi et al., 2001). Taken together, although type nAChR but not human fetal or adult-type muscle
there is no evidence for sulfoxaflor causing neonatal death or nAChRs.
limb abnormalities via neuronal nAChR agonism, there is In summary, these studies demonstrated that the develop-
consistent evidence for a single MoA for all developmental mental target for sulfoxaflor is the fetal rat muscle nAChR.
effects that is mediated by agonism at the fetal muscle-type Prolonged activity (agonism) at this receptor in rats causes
nAChR. sustained striated muscle contracture and reduced muscle
Bertrand, D., Cooper, E., Valera, S., Rungger, D., and Ballivet, M. (1991). Maclagan, J., and Vrbova, G. (1966). A study of the increased sensitivity of
Electrophysiology of neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors expressed in denervated and re-innervated muscle to depolarizing drugs. J. Physiol. 182,
Xenopus oocytes following nuclear injection of genes or cDNAs. In Methods 131–143.
in Neurosciences (P. M. Conn, Ed.), Vol. 4, pp. 174–193. Academic Press, Marr, M. C., Price, C. J., Myers, C. B., and Morrissey, R. E. (1992).
San Diego, CA. Developmental stages of the CD (Sprague-Dawley) rat skeleton after
Bowman, W. (1990). In Pharmacology of Neuromuscular Function, 2nd ed., maternal exposure to ethylene glycol. Teratology 46, 169–181.
John Wright, London, U.K. Millar, N. S., and Denholm, I. (2007). Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors:
Bulbring, E. (1946). Observations on the isolated phrenic nerve diaphragm Targets for commercially important insecticides. Invert. Neurosci. 7, 53–66.
preparation of the rat. Br. J. Pharmacol. Chemother. 1, 38–61. Millar, N. S., and Gotti, C. (2009). Diversity of vertebrate nicotinic
Collins, T. F., Welsh, J. J., Black, T. N., Whitby, K. E., and O’Donnell, M. W., acetylcholine receptors. Neuropharmacology 56, 237–246.
Jr (1987). Potential reversibility of skeletal effects in rats exposed in utero to Millar, N. S., and Lansdell, S. J. (2009). Characterisation of insect nicotinic
caffeine. Food Chem. Toxicol. 25, 647–662. acetylcholine receptors by heterologous expression. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol.
Cooper, J. C., Gutbrod, O., Witzemann, V., and Methfessel, C. (1996). 683, 65–73.
Pharmacology of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor from fetal rat muscle Mishina, M., Takai, T., Imoto, K., Noda, M., Takahashi, T., Numa, S.,
expressed in Xenopus oocytes. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 309, 287–298. Methfessel, C., and Sakmann, B. (1986). Molecular distinction between fetal
Croxen, R., Young, C., Slater, C., Haslam, S., Brydson, M., Vincent, A., and and adult forms of muscle acetylcholine receptor. Nature 321, 406–411.
Beeson, D. (2001). End-plate c- and e-subunit mRNA levels in AChR Robinson, S. R., and Smotherman, W. P. (1988). Behavior of the Fetus. The
deficient syndrome due to e-subunit null mutations. Brain 124, 1362–1372. Telford Press, Caldwell, NJ.