Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Outcome of Polyhydroamnios
Outcome of Polyhydroamnios
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the short- and long-term outcomes of children from pregnancies abstract
complicated with polyhydramnios, defined as amniotic fluid index (AFI) >24 cm, and with a
normal detailed ultrasound examination.
METHODS: This retrospective cohort study examined 134 children aged 4 to 9 years with
polyhydramnios and normal detailed ultrasound examination during pregnancy compared
with 268 controls with normal AFI and normal detailed ultrasound examination matched
for maternal age, year of delivery, gestational week at delivery, and presence or absence
of diabetes. The primary outcome was the rate of malformations diagnosed postnatally.
Additional outcomes were obstetrics outcomes, genetic syndromes, and neurodevelopment.
RESULTS: Polyhydramnios was associated with increased risk for cesarean delivery (CD)
and birth weight >90th percentile. This elevation in CD was attributed to increased rate of
elective CD due to suspected macrosomia. Polyhydramnios was associated with increased
risk for congenital malformations (n = 25 [19%] compared with 27 [10%], respectively;
P = .016) without a statistically significant increase in the rate of major malformations (11
[8%] vs. 10 [4%]; P = .057). Genetic syndromes were more prevalent in the polyhydramnios
group (5 [3.7%] vs. 2 [0.75%]; P = .043), as were neurologic disorders and developmental
delay (9.7% vs. 3%; P = .004).
CONCLUSIONS: Despite a normal detailed ultrasound examination, polyhydramnios is
associated with increased rate of fetal malformations, genetic syndromes, neurologic
disorders, and developmental delay, which may be diagnosed only after birth.
aDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Emek Medical Center, Afula, Israel; and bUltrasound Unit, WHAT’S KNOWN ON THIS SUBJECT: The outcome
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Emek Medical Center, Afula, Israel
of children with polyhydramnios depends on the
Dr Yefet drafted the initial manuscript; Dr Daniel-Spiegel designed the data collection instruments primary etiology (eg, maternal diabetes, fetal
and reviewed and revised the manuscript; and both authors conceptualized and designed the malformations). However, the short- and long-term
study and approved the final manuscript as submitted. outcome of polyhydramnios without a prenatal
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2015-1948 known etiology with normal detailed ultrasound
examination is not clear.
Accepted for publication Nov 17, 2015
Address correspondence to Enav Yefet, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Emek Medical WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: This study demonstrates
Center, Afula, Israel. Fax: 972-4-649-5483; e-mail: enavy1@gmail.com that despite a prenatal normal detailed ultrasound
examination, polyhydramnios is associated
PEDIATRICS (ISSN Numbers: Print, 0031-4005; Online, 1098-4275).
with increased risk for fetal malformations,
Copyright © 2016 by the American Academy of Pediatrics genetic syndromes, neurologic disorders, and
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: The authors have indicated they have no financial relationships relevant developmental delay that might be diagnosed only
to this article to disclose. after birth.
FUNDING: No external funding.
POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST: The authors have indicated they have no potential conflicts of
interest to disclose.
To cite: Yefet E and Daniel-Spiegel E. Outcomes From
Polyhydramnios With Normal Ultrasound. Pediatrics.
2016;137(2):e20151948
Polyhydramnios complicates 0.5% associated with preterm delivery, much of the data is based on studies
to 2% of all pregnancies. It may unstable lie, malpresentation,4 cord from 20 years ago, when sonographic
be defined as either the sum of 4 prolapse, and placental abruption.8 assessment and fetal and neonatal
quadrant measurements (amniotic management were less developed.
In 50% to 60% of cases, the
fluid index [AFI]) >24 cm or a single Second, other factors for unfavorable
etiology remains elusive during
pocket of amniotic fluid >8 cm.1,2 outcomes such as prematurity, which
pregnancy. Polyhydramnios by itself
Known maternal etiologies for is more common in polyhydramnios,
has a prognostic implication, as
polyhydramnios include diabetes were not sufficiently controlled for.
pregnancies with polyhydramnios
mellitus, placental tumors, and In addition, to date, the information
without fetal malformations are
fetal pathologies such as fetal regarding long-term outcomes of
associated with increased risk for
malformations, chromosomal children after pregnancies with
aberrations, and neuromuscular preterm labor, large for gestational
polyhydramnios is still scarce. One
abnormalities.3 age (LGA) and small for gestational
study that examined the effect
age fetuses, low Apgar scores, fetal
Different subdivisions of of idiopathic polyhydramnios
distress during labor, and increased
polyhydramnios have been found abnormalities in 28.4% of
rate of cesarean delivery (CD).
associated with different perinatal cases during the first year of life;2
Perinatal mortality was 2 to 5 times
outcomes. Increasing severity however, the study had no control
higher for neonates after pregnancies
correlates with increased group, and some of the abnormalities
complicated with idiopathic
perinatal mortality and congenital were related to prematurity and
polyhydramnios compared with the
abnormalities.4 Early diagnosis not polyhydramnios per se. Studies
general population.3,9–11
before 30 gestational weeks has been of older children are not available.
associated with worse prognosis Nevertheless, data regarding the Finally, 20% of polyhydramnios cases
because of more central nervous long- and short-term outcomes of are related to diabetes.3,12 Because
system abnormalities.5,6 Persistent children from pregnancies with polyhydramnios in such pregnancies
polyhydramnios has been associated polyhydramnios and normal detailed is not considered idiopathic, those
with fetal aneuploidy,7 and ultrasound examination is limited pregnancies were excluded from other
polyhydramnios at birth has been due to several considerations. First, studies and their outcome is not clear.
Data Collection
versus not (in this specific analysis, Study Outcomes
cases with rupture of membranes at Demographic and obstetric
The primary outcome of this characteristics and sonographic
admission were excluded). We also
study was the rate of overall evaluation were extracted from the
collected data regarding the value of
fetal malformations diagnosed electronic medical records of the
the maximal vertical pocket (MVP).
postnatally in the polyhydramnios ultrasound unit of the Department
In all the polyhydramnios cases
group compared with the control of Obstetrics and Gynecology at
according to the AFI in which the MVP
group. The secondary outcomes Emek Medical Center, Maternal-
measurement was available (n = 6), it
were the rates of major and minor Fetal Medicine Unit, and Labor
was >8 cm, and there were no cases
malformations. Major malformations and Delivery Unit. Birth weight
with MVP >8 cm in the control group.
were considered those that generally percentiles were calculated according
Control Group cause functional impairment or to Dollberg growth curves, adjusted
require surgical correction.14 for the Israeli population.15 LGA
For each pregnancy with
Additional secondary outcomes were neonates were defined as birth
polyhydramnios, 2 pregnancies with
genetic and chromosomal alterations weight >90th percentile, and
normal AFI (in all the available scans)
diagnosed postnatally, obstetric macrosomia was defined as birth
were matched according to maternal
outcomes such as mode of delivery, weight >4000 g. Data regarding the
age, year of delivery, gestational
indications for CD, birth weight, neonates were extracted from the
week at delivery, and diabetes.
gender, malpresentations, meconium, electronic medical records of the
Maternal age was matched using the
Apgar scores <7 after 1 and 5 neonatology department and the
following age groups: <20, 20 to 30,
minutes, admission to the NICU, NICU. Data regarding long-term
30 to 35, 35 to 40, and >40 years.
and trauma at birth. Data regarding outcomes were collected from the
Gestational week at delivery was
postnatal oxygen support, perinatal children’s medical records in the
matched using the following ranges:
metabolic abnormalities, jaundice, community and from specialized
≤31 weeks (6 days) of gestation,
need for phototherapy, and seizures child development clinics.
32 to 36 (6), 37 to 40 (6), and ≥41
were also collected.
(6). After defining the selection Statistical Analysis
parameters, the group was chosen Finally, data regarding
randomly using the random option in neurodevelopment were collected. Because the overall malformation
Excel software. Neurodevelopment impairment rate in the general population is
Obstetric Outcomes
Table 2 summarizes the obstetric
characteristics of the polyhydramnios
and control groups. The risk for CD
was increased in the polyhydramnios
group. This was attributed to an
increased rate of elective surgeries
because of suspected macrosomia.
Occurrence of LGA neonate and
FIGURE 2 macrosomia were also significantly
Age distribution of the children in this study from pregnancies complicated with polyhydramnios.
increased in the polyhydramnios
Note that the age distribution of the children from the control group is the same.
group. The increased rates of CD,
LGA, and macrosomia were also
reported to be ∼5%,16 the sample between polyhydramnios and statistically significant after adjusting
size required to detect a 10% diabetes and to adjust for diabetes. for diabetes (CD adjusted odds ratios
difference is 333 pregnancies in a Statistical analyses were carried out [aOR] 1.745, 95% confidence interval
ratio of 1:2 (111 pregnancies with with SAS version 9.2 (SAS Institute, [CI] 1.1–2.8; LGA aOR 2.5, 95% CI
polyhydramnios and 222 in the Cary, NC). Significance was set at a P 1.4–4.5; macrosomia aOR 2.5, 95% CI
control group; 80% power, 2-sided value <.05. 1.2–5.5).
α = 0.05). Because 134 pregnancies
matched the inclusion criteria with The study was approved by the local The obstetric outcomes described
268 cases in the control group, the institutional review board. in Table 2 were also compared
power to detect the study hypothesis according to the polyhydramnios
was 88%. characteristics described in Patients
RESULTS and Methods and Table 1. Severe
Categorical variables are presented polyhydramnios was associated with
Patient Characteristics
as frequencies and percentages. LGA (n = 11 [35%] cases in severe vs
Continuous variables are presented Figure 1 shows the patient flow chart. 14 [15%] in mild polyhydramnios;
as average, SD, and median. The During the study period, 14 131 P = .01) and malpresentations (3
associations between categorical women underwent an ultrasound [10%] in severe vs 1 [1%] in mild
variables were analyzed by using examination in the Obstetrics and polyhydramnios; P = .047). LGA
χ2 test or Fisher exact test. For Gynecology Unit at Emek Medical was also more common when
continuous data, differences were Center. A total of 312 (2.2%) women polyhydramnios was persistent
assessed with the t test or Mann– had polyhydramnios during the compared with nonpersistent cases
Whitney U test. Simple and multiple second or third trimester. Of those, (25 [26%] vs 2 [6%]; P = .01). All the
stepwise logistic regressions were 275 women had available detailed other comparisons were statistically
carried out to assess interactions ultrasound examination results, of insignificant (data not shown).
Updated Information & including high resolution figures, can be found at:
Services http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/137/2/e20151948
References This article cites 29 articles, 2 of which you can access for free at:
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/137/2/e20151948#BIBL
Subspecialty Collections This article, along with others on similar topics, appears in the
following collection(s):
Fetus/Newborn Infant
http://www.aappublications.org/cgi/collection/fetus:newborn_infant_
sub
Birth Defects
http://www.aappublications.org/cgi/collection/birth_defects_sub
Permissions & Licensing Information about reproducing this article in parts (figures, tables) or
in its entirety can be found online at:
http://www.aappublications.org/site/misc/Permissions.xhtml
Reprints Information about ordering reprints can be found online:
http://www.aappublications.org/site/misc/reprints.xhtml
The online version of this article, along with updated information and services, is
located on the World Wide Web at:
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/137/2/e20151948
Pediatrics is the official journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics. A monthly publication, it
has been published continuously since 1948. Pediatrics is owned, published, and trademarked by
the American Academy of Pediatrics, 141 Northwest Point Boulevard, Elk Grove Village, Illinois,
60007. Copyright © 2016 by the American Academy of Pediatrics. All rights reserved. Print ISSN:
1073-0397.