Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract
A possible phytotoxic effect of banana spray oil (BSO) was studied on banana cultivar 'Grand
Nain' (Musa spp., AAA subgroup ) in Israel where no yellow or black Sigatoka was present. Texaco
Spraytex® CT774, at rates of 2.6, 5.2 and 7.8 1 h a - 1, was applied using simulated aerial application
during two consecutive production cycles. Twelve and ten spray cycles were applied during the first
and second production cycles, respectively. BSO treatments were compared with the chlorothalonil
treatment (BRAVO ® 720, 2 1 ha- t ) and an untreated control. No visual phytotoxicity or very subtle
symptoms resulted from BSO application even at the highest rate. However, the highest rate of BSO
reduced growth rate, delayed flowering by 4 days, and reduced bunch weight by 5.6% (P< 0.05 ) dur-
ing the first production cycle when compared with the untreated control. A decrease of 8.4% in bunch
weight (P< 0.05 ) was observed in the second production cycle when the highest BSO rate was com-
pared with the untreated control. Bunch weight losses were directly related to BSO application rates.
The number of green leaves at harvest and number of hands per bunch were also significantly re-
duced during the second production cycle. Chlorothalonil application did not significantly affect any
of the parameters measured in this test when compared with the untreated control. This study indi-
cates BSO usage causes a reduction in banana yield.
Key words: Banana leaf spot; Banana spray oil; Banana yield; Phytotoxicity; Sigatoka
Introduction
Mineral spray oils have been in use since the late 1950s in spray programs
to control banana leaf spot in most commercial growing areas (Stover, 1972;
Stover and Simmonds, 1987). These oils were generally used alone or in com-
bination with fungicides to control yellow Sigatoka caused by Mycosphaerella
musicola Leach ( Cercospora musae Zimm). Banana spray oil was combined
with fixed coppers or dithiocarbamates in areas with climates more favorable
to disease development (Calpouzos, 1968, pp. 367-393; Stover and Sim-
monds, 1987).
*Corresponding author.
Table 1
Rates of banana spray oil (BSO), emulsifier and chlorothalonil application
29 Aug ]- FR
09 Aug ]_
19 Jul FL
J
22
05Jun
Jul t
07 Jun
24 May V
10 May
26 Apr
£3 17 Apr
¢- 20 Nov ]
O 02 Nov
(J 1 6 Oct [_
02 Oct FR
<
19 Sep
30 Jul
17 Jul
J
]- FL
19 Jun J
O_
09 05 Jun 1
22 May
04 May
03 Apr
30
02 Dec
Dec IV
07 Nov
24 Oct
12 Oct r
o lo 20 30 40 so 60 ¢o 8'o 90 100
Degrees C or Relative Humidity (%)
Fig. 1. Meteorological data and developmental stages of plants at spray application. Sprays were
applied during vegetative growth (V), flowering (FL, between floral initiation and shooting)
and fruiting (FR, between shooting and harvest) during 1988, 1989, and 1990.
tion. No spray drift occurred during applications. Spray coverage was good
on all exposed banana foliage.
Five spray applications every 2-3 weeks were made during the initial growth
period following planting in the autumn of 1988 (Fig. 1 ). Spray applications
were terminated when new leaf initiation ceased and restarted when new
growth occurred. Twelve and ten sprays every 2-3 weeks were applied during
the 1989 and 1990 growing seasons, respectively. Plants for the following sea-
son's production were approximately 1.5-1.6 m tall when spray applications
were terminated during each season except in 1990, when spray application
was terminated at the end of August. Termination was earlier than antici-
pated because of foliar overlap between plots which reduced application effi-
Y. Israeli et al. /Scientia Horticulturae 56 (1993) 107-117 111
Results
BSO application did not significantly reduce growth rates in terms of plant
height at flowering and pseudostem growth rates. However, leaf initiation rates
were significantly reduced at the high rate of BSO application (Table 2 ). Dif-
ferences were significant among treatments in terms of total leaf numbers at
flowering when comparing the highest BSO rate and the untreated control
(Table 3 ). However, a significant decrease in the number of green leaves at
harvest was observed in the high-rate BSO plots (4.7%) during the second
production cycle (Table 3 ).
A delay in flowering date was observed during the first production cycle
and was related to the rate of BSO applied (Table 4). The highest rate of BSO
application delayed the mean flowering date by 4 days and the mean harvest-
ing date by 16 days during the first production cycle with no difference being
detected between mean and median dates for these parameters (Table 4).
Although no significant differences within these parameters were observed
during the second production cycle, trends were similar to those noted above
with regard to flowering and harvest date.
The most obvious effect of BSO usage was the reduction in bunch weight
1 12 Y. Israeli et al. /Scientia Horticulturae 56 (1993) 107-I 17
Table 2
The effect of banana spray oil (BSO) and chlorothalonil on growth and leaf initiation rate
~Data reflect growth measurements from 13 October 1988 through 1 July 1989.
21989, first production cycle; 1990, second production cycle.
Values in each column followed by the same superscript do not differ significantly using Duncan's
multiple range test ( P < 0.05).
Table 3
The effect of banana spray oil (BSO) and chlorothalonil on the number of green leaves per plant at
flowering and harvest
At flowering At harvest
Values in each column followed by the same superscript do not differ significantly using Duncan's
multiple range test ( P < 0.05 ); 1989, first production cycle; 1990, second production cycle.
(Table 5 ). The highest BSO rate significantly reduced bunch weight during
the entire 2 year test period. The bunch weight reduction was 5.6% and 8.4%
during the first and second production cycles, respectively. The reduction in
bunch weight appeared to be correlated with BSO application rate.
Finger length was slightly reduced by BSO application during the second
production cycle (Table 6 ). Finger circumference (equivalent to grade) was
not affected by BSO application. The number of hands per bunch was signif-
icantly lower (3.8%) during the second production cycle in plots treated with
the highest rate of BSO (Table 6). Plots receiving chlorothalonil sprays were
not significantly different from untreated plots in any of the growth or pro-
duction parameters measured during this experiment. No visual symptoms
of phytotoxicity were evident in any of the treatments, with the exception of
Y. Israeli et aL / Scientia Horticulturae 56 (1993) 107-117 I 13
Table 4
The effect of banana spray oil (BSO) and chlorothalonil on flowering date, harvest date and interval
from flowering to harvst
Values in each column followed by the same superscript do not differ significantly using Duncan's
multiple range test ( P < 0.05 ); 1989, first production cycle; 1990, second production cycle.
Table 5
The effect of banana spray oil (BSO) and chlorothalonil on banana yield"
1989 1990
Values in each column followed by the same superscript do not differ significantly using Duncan's
multiple range test ( P < 0.05 ); 1989, first production cycle; 1990, second production cycle.
Table 6
The effect of banana spray oil (BSO) and chlorothalonil on finger length, finger circumference and
number of hands per bunch
Treatment Mean finger length Mean finger Mean no. of hands per
(cm) circumference (cm) bunch
Values in each column followed by the same superscript do not differ significantly using Duncan's
multiple range test ( P < 0.05 ); 1989, first production cycle; 1990, second production cycle.
1 14 Y. Israeli et al. / Scientia Horticulturae 56 (1993) 107-117
some occasional, mild leaf flecking occurring on the foliage treated with the
highest rate of BSO.
Discussion
Conclusions
The data demonstrate that BSO usage in Sigatoka control programs reduces
yield. Yield reduction in this study was not correlated with visual phytotox-
icity symptom expression in the field which makes it difficult to assess ad-
verse effects from BSO usage and make appropriate spray treatment adjust-
ments to reduce yield loss. In addition to bunch weight reduction, flowering
and harvest dates were delayed during the first production cycle by BSO treat-
ment. This suggests that continuous cumulative increases in yield loss may
1 16 Y. Israeli et al. / Scientia Horticulturae 56 (1993) 107-117
Acknowledgments
References
Anonymous, 1961. La premiere reunion internationale sur la production de la banane. Fruits,
16:231-242.
Brun, J., 1958. Etude sur Faction des fongicides huileux dans la lutte contra la cercosporiose.
Fruits 13: 3-14.
Calpouzos, L., 1968. Oils. In: D.C. Torgason (Editor), Fungicides: An Advanced Treatise, Vol.
2. Academic Press, New York, pp. 367-393.
Calpouzos, L. and Colberg, C., 1964. Importance of source of spray oils for Sigatoka disease
control and ph2ctotoxicity to banana leaves. Phytopathology, 54: 235-236.
Calpouzos, L., Brun, W.A., Theis, T. and Colberg, C., 1960. A precision spray technique for
evaluating oils for Sigatoka disease control on individual banana leaves in the field. Phyto-
pathology, 50:69-72.
Calpouzos, L., Colberg, C., Theis, T. and Delfel, N.E., 1961a. Deposit rate and spray oil com-
position in relation to phytotoxicity and Sigatoka disease control on banana leaves. Phyto-
pathology, 51: 582-584.
Calpouzos, L., Delfel, N.E., Colberg, C. and Theis, T., 196 lb. Relation of petroleum oil com-
position to phytotoxicity and Sigatoka disease control on banana leaves. Phytopathology,
51: 317-321.
Calpouzos, L., Delfel, N.E., Colberg, C. and Theis, T., 196 lc. Viscosity of naphthenic and par-
affinic spray oils in relation to phytotoxicity and Sigatoka diseases control on banana leaves.
Phytopathology, 51: 528- 531.
Corke, A.T.K. and Jordan, V.W.L., 1963. Experiments on the effects ofoil treatment on banana
leaves. Annual Report, Agriculture and Horticulture Research Station, University of Bristol,
UK, pp. 115-123.
Delfel, N.E., Calpouzos, L. and Colberg, C., 1962. Measurement of spray-oil volatility and its
relation to Sigatoka fungus disease control and phytotoxicity on banana leaves. Phytopath-
ology, 52: 913-917.
Desrosiers, R., 1958. The control of Sigatoka disease on the 'Gros Michel' banana by low vol-
ume spraying in Ecuador. Min. Fomento Produccion, Direc. Gen. Agr. Quito, Ecuador Tech.
Bull. 1, pp. 1-58.
Fullerton, R.A. and Stover, R.H. (Editors), 1990. Sigatoka Leaf Spot Diseases of Banana. Proc.
Int. Workshop, San Jose, Costa Rica, 28 March-1 April 1989, INIBAP, Montpellier, France,
374 pp.
Guyot, H. and Cuille, L, 1955. Los traitements fongicides des bananeraies. II. Efficaciles des
differents modes dc traitements. Role de l'huile. Fruits, 10: 101-107.
Israeli, Y. and Lahav, E., 1986. Banana. In: S.P. Monselise (Editor), CRC Handbook of Fruit
Set and Development. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 45-73.
Israeli, Y. and Nameri, N., 1987. Seasonal changes in banana plant water use. Water Irrig. Rev.
Isr., January 1987: 10-14.
Y. Israeli et al. /Scientia Horticulturae 56 (1993) 107-117 1 17
Laville, E., 1963. Contribution a l'etude de la penetration et la localisation des huiles dans la
feuille de bananier. Fruits, 18: 339-344.
Pont, W., 1960. Epidemiology and control of banana leaf spot ( M y c o s p h a e r e l l a m u s i c o l a Leach)
in North Queensland. Qld. J. Agric. Sci., 17:211-272.
Price, D., 1960. The effects of several spray regimes on banana fruit weights. Trop. Agric., 37:
325-328.
Reidhart, J.M., 1961. Influence of petroleum oil on photosynthesis of banana leaves. Trop. Agric.,
38: 23-27.
Reidhart, J.M., 1964. Influence of petroleum oil fractions on Sigatoka disease control in ba-
nanas. Trop. Agric., 41:155-158.
Statistical Analysis Systems Institute, 1987. SAS/STAT Guide for Personal Computers, Version
6 edn. SAS, Cary, NC, 1020 pp.
Stover, R.H., 1972. Banana, Plantain, and Abaca Diseases. Commonwealth Mycological Insti-
tute, Kew, UK, 316 pp.
Stover, R.H. and Simmonds, N.W., 1987. Bananas. John Wiley, New York, 468 pp.
Ticho, R.T., 1970. The banana industry in Israel. Trop. Sci., 13: 289-301.
Tolenaar, D., 1960. Effects of copper and oil in the control of Sigatoka banana leaf spot. Neth.
J. Agric. Sci., 8: 253-260.