Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Convection
(37)
(19)
Assume
(20)
(21)
(41)
(42)
(45)
(46)
(48)
(49a)
(49b)
(49c)
Table.2
x-momentum equation:
(7)
(50)
(51)
MEC 536 Heat Transfer by Convection
Dr. Mohamed Salem Elmnefi 8
Application of (7) to the inviscid flow outside the viscous boundary
layer, gives:
(52)
Assume
(55)
(56)
(59)
Boundary conditions:
(60a)
(60b)
(60c)
Where θ is defined as:
(36)
Assume
(61)
η is defined in (54). (54)-(56), (20) into (59) and (60)
(62)
(63a)
(63b)
(63c)
Solution. Separating variables in (62), integrating twice and applying
boundary conditions (63), gives the temperature solution as:
(64)
(65)
(66)
(67)
(68)
(68) into (67) gives the Nusselt number
(69)
Solution
(1) Observations.
(i) This is an external forced convection boundary layer problem.
(ii) Changes in velocity between locations 1 and 3 should be small compared
to those between 2 and 4.
(iii) Location 4 should have the lowest velocity.
(iv) If the flow is laminar, Blasius solution can be used to determine the
velocity distribution and boundary layer thickness.
(v) The flow is laminar if Reynolds number is less than 500,000.
(2) Problem Definition. Determine the axial velocity at the five given
locations.
(3) Solution Plan. Check the Reynolds number to determine if boundary
layer approximations can be made and if the flow is laminar. If it is, use
Blasius solution, Table 1(Blasius solution) , to determine the axial velocity
at the five locations and boundary layer thickness.
The flow is laminar if Rex < Rext . Viscous boundary layer approximations
are valid for
(c)
MEC 536 Heat Transfer by Convection
Dr. Mohamed Salem Elmnefi 18
Evaluating the Reynolds number at x = 151 mm, equation (a) gives
(d)
where
(24)
(iv) Checking.
Dimensional check: Computations showed that equations (a) and (d) are
dimensionally correct.
Qualitative check: The velocity at the five locations follows an expected
behavior; minor changes in velocity in the x-direction and significant
changes in the y-direction.
(5) Comments.
(i) The insect should move to location 4 where the axial velocity is lowest.
(ii) Changes in axial velocity with respect to x, at the same distance y from
the plate, are minor.
(iii) Changes in axial velocity with respect to y, at the same distance x, are
significant.
(iv) The tabulated values of u are approximate since they are determined
by interpolations of Table 1
(v) What is important for the insect is the magnitude of the velocity vector
and not the axial component u. However, since v << u
in boundary layer flow, using u as a measure of total velocity is reasonable.
MEC 536 Heat Transfer by Convection
Dr. Mohamed Salem Elmnefi 22
Example 2: Laminar Convection over a Flat Plate
Water flows with a velocity of 0.25 m/s over a 75 cm long plate.
Free stream temperature is 35°C and surface temperature is 85°C.
[a] Derive an equation for the thermal boundary layer thickness δt in
terms of the Reynolds number.
[b] Determine the heat transfer coefficient at x = 7.5 cm and 75 cm.
[c] Determine the heat transfer rate for a plate 50 cm wide.
[d] Can Pohlhausen's solution be used to determine the heat flux at
the trailing end of the plate if its length is doubled?
Solution
(1) Observations.
(i) This is an external forced convection over a flat plate.
(ii) The thermal boundary layer thickness increases with distance along the
plate.
(iii)Newton’s law of cooling gives surface heat flux and heat transfer rate
from the plate. MEC 536 Heat Transfer by Convection
Dr. Mohamed Salem Elmnefi 23
(iv) The heat transfer coefficient changes with distance along the plate.
(vi) Doubling the length doubles the Reynolds number
(v) Pohlhausen's solution is applicable only if the flow is laminar and all
other assumptions leading to this solution are valid.
where
The transition Reynolds number Ret for flow over a semi-infinite plate is
(b)
Properties of water are evaluated at the film temperature Tf and
given by:
(c)
where
Ts = surface temperature = 85oC
MEC 536 Heat Transfer by Convection
Dr. Mohamed Salem Elmnefi 26
T∞ = free stream temperature = 35oC
and
Comparison with equations (a) and (b) shows that boundary layer
approximations can be made and the flow is laminar at x = 7.5 cm.
At the trailing edge, x = L = 75 cm, the Reynolds number ReL = 3.949 x 105
Since this is less than the transition number it follows that the flow is laminar
over the entire plate. Thus, Pohlhausen's solution is applicable.
[a] Determination of δt :
At the edge of the thermal boundary layer y = δt and T ≈T∞
Thus,
or
(d)
MEC 536 Heat Transfer by Convection
Dr. Mohamed Salem Elmnefi 28
[b] Heat transfer coefficient. The local heat transfer coefficient is given in
equation (68)
(68)
(49b)
(49b)
Similarly, at x = 0.75 m
[c] Heat transfer rate. Equation gives the total heat transfer rate from the plate
(71)
(46)
MEC 536 Heat Transfer by Convection
Dr. Mohamed Salem Elmnefi 30
The Reynolds number at the trailing edge is ReL= 3.949 x 105.
Substituting into equation (46).
Since this Reynolds number is greater than Ree = 5 x 105 the flow at the
trailing end is turbulent and consequently Pohlhausen's solution is not
applicable (can not used).
MEC 536 Heat Transfer by Convection
Dr. Mohamed Salem Elmnefi 31
(24)
Comparing (d) with equation (24) indicates that the thermal boundary
layer thickness for water is smaller than the velocity boundary layer.