You are on page 1of 7

Information & Management 37 (2000) 153±159

Customer relationships and the small software ®rm


A framework for understanding challenges faced in marketing$
Dr. Kimmo AlajoutsijaÈrvi (Professor of Marketing)a,*, Dr. Kari Mannermaa (Research
Professor)a, Dr. Henrikki Tikkanen (Professor of Entrepreneurship & Management)b
a
Business School, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
b
University of Kuopio, Kuopio, Finland

Received 10 December 1998; received in revised form 3 March 1999; accepted 9 August 1999

Abstract

This paper identi®es the major marketing challenges small software ®rms face during their growth and internationalization
processes. It starts with an analysis of small software company activities along a continuum from `project business' to `product
business.' This is followed by a brief analysis of the two major schools of thought in marketing, in which there is a paradigm
shift from the traditional notion of marketing-mix management towards `relationship marketing' is discernible. Finally, the
discussion is summarized in a framework for identifying the major marketing challenges facing software company managers
at the beginning of the next millenium. # 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords: Marketing; Customer relationships; SMEs; Software industry; Internationalization

1. The managerial challenge of growth and nowadays ranks third among its largest industries, and
internationalization for small software firms amounts for approximately 75 percent of the world
software market.
During the 1990s, the software industry has grown The dominance of large US software companies,
and internationalized. At the end of the decade, we are such as Microsoft and Oracle, is so evident that one
facing a situation in which there is a large and growing seldom thinks that the global market share of Eur-
international market worth over 100 billion US$ per opean software producers is currently ca. 20 percent
annum for different software products, including and that it is growing steadily. Most European soft-
embedded software, packaged software and tailored ware ®rms are relatively small and concentrated
systems [28]. However, the rapid growth of the indus- almost solely on serving their home markets. For
try has not been generally recognized. For instance, it instance, there are approximately 2000 software com-
is little known that the software industry in the US panies in Finland and only 10 percent have regular
export activities. However, today software is increas-
$ ingly needed, both for new products as well as in
(Briefing) Editing by E.H. Sibley
*
Corresponding author. Tel.:‡358-553-2929; fax:‡358-553-
various development and manufacturing processes.
2906. Smaller ®rms can also bene®t from the growth of
E-mail address: kimmo.alajoutsijarvi@oulu.fi (K. AlajoutsijaÈrvi). the industry through increased internationalization:

0378-7206/00/$ ± see front matter # 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
PII: S 0 3 7 8 - 7 2 0 6 ( 9 9 ) 0 0 0 3 9 - 7
154 K. AlajoutsijaÈrvi et al. / Information & Management 37 (2000) 153±159

for example, Finnish software producers have marize our discussion in a framework for identifying
increased their exports by more than 40 percent the major managerial challenges faced by software
annually since the mid-1990s [17]. Internationaliza- company managers at the beginning of the next mil-
tion and `productization' can be seen as the key lenium.
prerequisites for continued growth in the software We have cooperated extensively with dozens of
business. In the context of the software industry, small Finnish software ®rms in the collection of
productization typically includes a shift from unique information for the study reported here. Numerous
service-intensive customer projects towards tangible qualitative in-depth interviews were conducted, com-
standardized products aimed at international mass plemented by several group discussions with man-
markets. We argue that this shift from local to inter- agers during seminars arranged by the University of
national product business calls for a major mindset Oulu, etc. Thus, the arguments represent our under-
change in understanding and managing growing soft- standing of the typical situation faced by small ®rms in
ware companies. This is especially relevant for small the software industry.
Nordic software ®rms, because of the openness and
small size of their home markets. On the other hand,
the Nordic countries are at the forefront of IT devel- 2. Software business in the late 1990s Ð from
opment and use, which offers sofware ®rms a unique tailored systems to packaged products?
opportunity to gain competitive advantage in interna-
tional markets. For instance, the penetration rate of We are a small company concentrated heavily
cellular phones and the use of the Internet per house- on tailored software systems. Our customer
hold in Finland are the highest in the world. relationships are long-term oriented and based
The purpose of this paper is to identify the major on mutual trust. Actually, we do not perform any
marketing challenges that small software ®rms face specific marketing activities, and thus we do not
during their growth and internationalization. It has have much professional marketing experience
been argued that managerial competence, especially in either.
marketing, currently remains at a rather premature Senior Executive, Small Software Firm in the Oulu
stage in many software companies where technology Region
development has traditionally been the central area of As this quotation highlights, small European soft-
interest among managers [12,24]. Furthermore, prob- ware producers generally do business in the tailored
ably due to the newness of the industry, academic software segment in their own home country within
discussion on the management of the software busi- established customer relationships, without perform-
ness has been scarce: only a few contributions exist ing activities that resemble those described as market-
that speci®cally tackle the management of small soft- ing in well-known, traditionally oriented textbooks.
ware companies [4,5,6,7]. One of the main conclu- However, many small software companies nowadays
sions in these studies is the ever-growing importance intend to enter the international packaged software
of marketing in the development of software ®rms. We market, which naturally functions in accordance with
would argue that there is currently a clear need for a business logic very different from the familiar local
software industry-sensitive management and market- context.
ing concepts. On the other hand, the software industry Table 1 compares tailored software-systems busi-
also offers an interesting arena for the development of ness with packaged-software business, along the key
management theory in a dynamic setting. dimensions differentiating these two areas. Despite
Firstly, we analyse small software company activ- the dichotomized presentation in our table, we see
ities along a continuum from `project business' to `project business' and `product business' as the
`product business.' Secondly, we brie¯y analyse the extreme polar opposites along a continuum highlight-
two major traditions or schools of thought in market- ing changes in business logic when moving from
ing in which a paradigm shift from the traditional tailored systems towards increased productization.
notion of marketing mix management towards `rela- Larger players in the international market for pack-
tionship marketing' is discernible. Finally, we sum- aged software already act in accordance with the
K. AlajoutsijaÈrvi et al. / Information & Management 37 (2000) 153±159 155

Table 1
Tailored systems business versus packaged software business

Project business: tailored systems Product business: packaged software

Central capabilities Project marketing and management Productization, channel management, alliance
building strategic partners in the industry
Object of Exchange Unique project designed and implemented in Standard and/or modular products, designed for
cooperation with the customer; designed for a several different operating systems and hardware
certain hardware environment, service content high environments, service content low
Production Activities within projects, production `after sales,' Duplication, the production of updates or `versions,'
connections between all functions of the company, production `before sales,' production function
discontinuity between projects, deadlines crucial rather independent of other company functions
Customer base Narrow, well-known customers Broad, faceless end-customers
Nature of markets Familiar local/domestic, closed and networked Distant international, open, competitive
Branding Not important, market assets concentrated on key Central area of interest
individuals
Nature of exchange Interactive, mutual, multi-faceted, long-term oriented, Opportunistic, simple, short-term oriented,
project-related exchange product-related exchange
Type of organization Ad hoc project organizations Market, product, or matrix organization

transactional logic labelled `product business'. On the and different relational approaches form the basic
other hand, small and locally operating companies two alternative approaches to marketing [22,27].
typically follow the relational logic connected to more Several authors (e.g. [30]) have also proposed that
or less unique project deliveries, the `project busi- different business relationships vary along a `market-
ness'. The objective of many small companies to enter ing-strategy continuum' or a `range of marketing
the more transactional product business can be seen as relationships.' At one end of the continuum is the
paradoxical from the marketing theory point of view purely transactional relationship, in which the custo-
that currently puts emphasis on the development of mer and the seller focus on the short-term exchange of
intensive long-term customer relationships. From an basic products in a highly competitive market. This
entrepreneurial viewpoint, however, this desire is approach is identical to the traditional notion of
not surprising. Bill Gates did not get rich through marketing mix management. At the other end is the
selling tailor-made, labour-intensive systems; he purely collaborative relationship, or even a hierarchy
productized his expertise in operating systems in the form of vertical integration, in which the
and eventually achieved a huge world-wide mass- customer and the supplier organizations form strong
marketing success. social, economic, technical, and legal bonds over time
in order to achieve mutual bene®t. The second
approach has its primary theoretical underpinnings
3. Marketing thinking in the late 1990s in International Marketing and Purchasing Group
(IMP) interaction/network research [8,15,16] and
There has been constant discussion on the differ- the so-called Nordic School of Services and Relation-
ences and similarities of different research traditions ship Marketing [10].
or schools-of-thought in marketing since the early The emergence of the marketing mix approach
1970s. For instance, Hunt [14] and Sheth et al. dates back to the late 1940s, when the marketer
[26], have presented their widely-known typologies. was conceptualized as a `mixer of ingredients'. Since
Furthermore, MoÈller [19] and GroÈnroos [9] have then the managerial school of thought has virtually
identi®ed slightly different traditions, based on a become the universal model for marketing among both
European perspective. In the late 1990s, however, academicians and practitioners. The marketing mix
there seemed to be widespread consensus that the management approach can be characterized as tack-
traditional marketing mix management paradigm ling the following problem: How to develop an opti-
156 K. AlajoutsijaÈrvi et al. / Information & Management 37 (2000) 153±159

mal marketing mix consisting of product, price, place regard its adoption as the key for entering the inter-
and promotion decisions for competing for the pre- national market for packaged software: they do not
ferences of the chosen target segment of consumers or consider the development of their present long-term
organizational buyers. customer relationships as `marketing.' The manage-
Much research has been conducted on business ment of an internationalizing software company may
relationships and networks. The earliest studies con- believe that it is facing a completely new phenom-
centrated mostly on understanding the nature of dya- enon, requiring the adoption of more `professional'
dic relationships based on the observation that both marketing techniques such as the 4Ps. Some recent
customer and supplier are active [29]. In the next academic contributions that argue that the marketing
phase, the focus changed towards understanding the mix approach is best suited for getting new customers
dynamic development of dyadic relationships. One of and that relationship marketing is best for the retention
the main conclusions of the IMP Group studies was of existing customers might even give theoretical
that a dyadic relationship has to be concidered in the support to this idea [18].
context of a larger set of inter-®rm relationships
forming the business context of the focal dyad. The
underlying rationale was to understand the actions of 4. A framework for identifying major managerial
the buyer and seller, and the longitudinal development challenges in the software business
of their relationship. This network perspective has
recently attracted considerable. [1,3,21,30]. It is now possible to sketch the framework that is
Table 2 compares the central tenets of the two polar illustrated in Table 3. Through positioning themselves
opposites along a continuum from transaction to in accordance with their dominant business logic on
relationship marketing. However, it should be remem- the one hand and their primary marketing approaches
bered that we have summarized the two approaches in on the other, companies can identify managerial chal-
a somewhat pointed way in order clarify their major lenges during their growth and internationalization
philosophical differences. processes. The matrix describes four different situa-
It could be argued that many small software com- tions companies may face. Cell (1) depicts the typical
panies seem to perceive marketing mix management situation, in which a company operates in project
as the `true' way of doing marketing. Thus, they may business within established customer relationships

Table 2
A comparison of the major theoretical approaches to marketing

The marketing mix approach The relational marketing approach

World view Managing a company's product portfolio, setting Managing a company's customer portfolio, building
and modifying marketing mix-parameters to long-term business relationships
achieve optimal 4P configuration
Key concepts 4 Ps, segmentation, branding etc. Interaction, relationships and networks
Foreign market entry The choice of a product/market, defining the goals Focuses on the character and number of business
in the target market, the choice of entry mode, relationships developed with other firms in the foreign
developing the marketing plan for penetration, the network as well as with the actors that are active in the
creation of control systems for monitoring development of these relationships
Market interaction One-way communication, formal market studies, Interactive communication, mutual learning and adap-
the seller is the active counterpart tations, all interaction parties active
Differentiation Product differentiation Relationship differentiation
Negotiations Not seen as important Crucial
Promotion Non-personal advertising, brand and image Through personal interaction, developing identity as a
management reliable supplier in a network
Mutuality Not seen as important, own short-term goals and Seen as very important, own long-term goals are
market opportunism are the central focus achieved through concessions in short-term goals
K. AlajoutsijaÈrvi et al. / Information & Management 37 (2000) 153±159 157

Table 3
A framework for identifying major managerial challenges in the software business

The relational marketing approach The marketing mix approach

Project business (1) The typical situation faced by most small (3) An impossible situation. Tailoring is not currently
software companies: unique tailored projects possible without cooperation with the customer
within long-term customer relationships
Product business (2) Product business within long-term -oriented (4) Traditional mass marketer functioning in atomistic,
customer relationships. Productization of learning competitive markets. Product development mainly
from projects. through formal market research and immediate
sales response.

with a relational marketing approach. On the other development of customer relationships, since it can be
hand, Cell (4) depicts the objective of many software seen as an important element in building customer
companies in internationalization: following the mar- loyalty.
keting mix approach. Cell (2) depicts some kind of This might lead us to conclude that the critical
intermediate form between `pure' relational project question in the internationalization of a small software
and international mass-product business. It is ques- company is not whether to adopt the 4Ps/marketing
tionable whether Cell (3) Ð project business in mix approach or whether to rely solely on relationship
accordance with the marketing mix approach Ð will marketing (cf. [20]), but to identify actions which
ever be a feasible alternative. decrease the uncertainty and risks perceived by for-
While moving from Cell (1) to cells (2) and (4), an eign customers. This typically calls for the simulta-
important issue is managing the risk perceived by neous adoption of some features from both marketing
small software companies' foreign partners and cus- approaches. The desire expressed by numerous entre-
tomers. Risks related to the acquisition of software can preneurs to shift from Cell (1) to Cell (4) is, therefore,
generally be divided into the following components: seen to be overly simplistic. On the other hand, the
those related to the unfamiliar product and those recent determination of marketing academics to
related to an unknown supplier (cf. [25]). Productiza- emphasize relational concepts in almost all business
tion reduces the risk related to the product, since the settings also proves to be unrealistic in the setting that
buyer can test its functionality before the purchase small software companies face when growing and
decision is made; this is not possible when buying internationalizing.
tailored systems. On the other hand, small software We argue that the most important managerial
companies must establish credibility as reliable sup- challenges that small software companies are facing
pliers when entering foreign markets. This cannot be involve how to `enter' cells (2) and (4), which demand
done without developing mutually oriented relation- a new business logic, while maintaining traditional
ships with cooperative partners in target markets. way of doing business. The most important managerial
Thus, productization combined with internationa- questions will then probably revolve around the
lization does not necessarily imply unilateral move- questions:
ment from relationship development to more
traditional marketing mix-based product marketing. 1. How can we develop strategic and operational
The internationalization process essentially involves capabilities in product business to complement
the incremental creation of personal relationships with capabilities in the traditional project business?
foreign customers, that is, building a basis of trust. 2. How can we simultaneously manage several
This is directly connected to the reduction of the businesses with differing logics, for example,
uncertainty and risk perceived by the customers. cells (1), (2) and (4)?
Moreover, brand building basically aims at the same 3. How can we form and simultaneously manage
objective. In fact, branding is close to the long-term profitable product and customer portfolios?
158 K. AlajoutsijaÈrvi et al. / Information & Management 37 (2000) 153±159

5. Conclusions Economics and Business Administration, A-2, 1998, pp. 103±


118
[11] J. Hamill, K. Gregory, Internet marketing in the internatio-
In the near future, the emerging phenomena of nalisation of UK SMEs, Journal of Marketing Management
Electronic Commerce and Internet Marketing should 13, 1997, pp. 9±28.
also be added to our framework. Electronic Commerce [12] T. Hilburn, Software Engineering Education: A Modest
as a form of doing software business on the Internet Proposal, IEEE Software, 1997, pp. 44±48.
will clearly involve a new business logic Ð different [13] D.L. Hoffman, T.P. Novak, Marketing in hypermedia
computer-mediated environments: Conceptual foundations,
from the more traditional project and product busi- Journal of Marketing 60, 1996, pp. 50±68.
nesses. Furthermore, parallel `Internet Marketing' will [14] S.D. Hunt, Modern Marketing Theory. Critical Issues in the
also require a restructuring of marketing practice and Philosophy of Marketing Science, South-Western Publishing
theory. Since software products and support services Co., Cincinnati, 1991.
can now easily be offered through the Internet, sig- [15] H. HaÊkansson (Ed.), International Marketing and Purchasing
of Industrial Goods: An Interaction Approach, Wiley, New
ni®cant changes are already occurring in business York, 1982.
practices in many industries [2,13]. In this sense, it [16] H. HaÊkansson, I. Snehota (Eds.), Developing Relationships in
is legitimate to ask whether the slow, evolutionary, and Business Networks, Routledge, London, 1995.
incremental view of SME internationalization remains [17] P. JaÈnnes, Ohjelmistovienti verkottuu Ð Ohjelmistot ideaa-
valid when Internet technology provides small soft- linen kauppatavara internetissaÈ [Software exports, networking
and the internet], Suomen Ulkomaankauppa 3, 1997, pp. 10±16.
ware companies with a rapid, low-cost gateway to [18] K. Mannermaa, Moniulotteinen markkinointi [flexible mar-
foreign markets (cf. [11,23]). keting], Gummerus Kirjapaino, 1993.
[19] K. MoÈller, Research Traditions in Marketing: Theoretical
Notes, in: H.C. Blomqvist, C. GroÈnroos, L.J. Lindqvist (Eds.),
References Economics and Marketing Ð Essays in Honour of GoÈsta
Mickwitz, Publications of the Swedish School of Economics,
[1] J.C. Anderson, H. HaÊkansson, J. Johanson, Dyadic business 1992, pp. 197±217.
relationships within a business network context, Journal of [20] K. MoÈller, A. Halinen-Kaila, Relationship marketing: Its
Marketing 58, 1994, pp. 1±15. disciplinary roots and future directions, in: H. Tikkanen (Ed.),
[2] M.C. Angelides, Implementing the internet for business: A Marketing and International Business Ð Essays in Honour of
global marketing opportunity, International Journal of Professor Karin Holstius on her 65th Birthday, Publications of
Information Management 17(6), 1997, pp. 405±419. the Turku School of Economics and Business Administration,
[3] B. Axelsson, G. Easton (Eds.) Industrial Networks Ð A New 1998.
View of Reality, Routledge, London, 1992. [21] K. MoÈller, D.T. Wilson (Eds.), Business Marketing: An
[4] J. Bell, A comparative study of the export problems of small Interaction and Network Perspective, Kluwer, USA, 1995.
computer software exporters in Finland, Ireland, Norway, [22] R. Olkkonen, Forging Links between Marketing and Sponsor-
International Business Review 6(6), 1997, pp. 585±604. ship. A Theoretical Investigation, Licentiate's Thesis, Turku
[5] J. Bell, The Internationalization of small computer software School of Economics, 1998.
firms. A further challenge to `Stage' theories, European [23] S. Poon, C. Jevons, Internet-enabled international marketing:
Journal of Marketing 29(8), 1995, pp. 60±75. A small business network perspective, Journal of Marketing
[6] K.D. Brouthers, The Influence of international risk on entry Management 13, 1997, pp. 29±41.
mode strategy in the computer software industry, Manage- [24] P.M. Rao, J.A. Klein, Growing importance of marketing
ment International Review 35(1), 1995, pp. 7±27. strategies for the software industry, Industrial Marketing
[7] N. Coviello, H. Munro, Network Relationships and the Management 21(1), 1994, pp. 29±37.
internationalization process of small software firms, Interna- [25] S. Sherer, Purchasing software systems. Managing the risk,
tional Business Review 6(4), 1997, pp. 361±386. Information & Management 24, 1993, pp. 257±266.
[8] D. Ford, L.-E. Gadde, H. HaÊkansson, A. Lundgren, I. [26] J.N. Sheth, D.M. Gardner, D.E. Garrett, Marketing Theory.
Snehota, P. Turnbull, D. Wilson, Managing Business Evolution and Evaluation, Wiley, New York, 1988.
Relationships, Wiley, England, 1998. [27] J.N. Sheth, A. Parvatiyar, The evolution of relationship market-
[9] C. GroÈnroos, From Marketing Mix to Relationship Market- ing, International Business Review 4(4), 1995, pp. 397±414.
ing: Towards a Paradigm Shift in Marketing, Asia-Australia [28] Start Fund of Kera, Suomen ohjelmistoviennin mahdollisuu-
Marketing Journal 2(1), 1994. det [The Possibilities of Finnish Software Exports], 1996.
[10] E. Gummesson, Relationship marketing: A global wake-up [29] P. Turnbull, J.P. Valla, Strategies in International Industrial
call for marketers, n Marketing and international business Ð Marketing, Croom Helm, London, 1986.
Essays in honour of Prof. Karin Holstius on her 65th birthday, [30] F.E. Webster, The changing role of marketing in the
in: H. Tikkanen (Ed.), Publications of the Turku School of corporation, Journal of Marketing 56, 1992, pp. 1±17.
K. AlajoutsijaÈrvi et al. / Information & Management 37 (2000) 153±159 159

Kimmo AlajoutsijaÈrvi is a Professor of tional marketing from the Turku School of Economics and
Industrial Marketing at the University of Business Administration, Finland. He has published articles and
Oulu. He holds an M.Sc. in Accounting monographs in marketing and international business on topics such
and Ph.D. in Marketing from the Uni- as industrial networks and business relationships, business
versity of JyvaÈskylaÈ. He has published processes and core competencies and international project market-
articles in marketing and management ing. His articles appear in journals such as Journal of Business &
on many topics including the manage- Industrial Marketing, Advances in Business Marketing & Purchas-
ment of customers relationships and ing, Journal of International Marketing & Marketing Research,
industrial networks, core competence, Journal of International Selling and Sales Management, Finnish
business cycles and sponsorship in Journal of Business Economics, and Business Processes Re-
journals such as European Journal of Marketing, Journal of engineering and Management Journal.
Business-to-Business Marketing, Advances in Business Marketing
and Purchasing, Journal of International Selling and Sales Kari Mannermaa holds a doctorate in
Management, Journal of International Marketing and Marketing marketing and is a Research Professor at
Research, Corporate Communications ± An International Journal, the University of Oulu, Finland. His
and Pulp and Paper International. He is also author and co-author special field is network management and
of several research monographs on marketing and management. marketing channels. He is author of
numerous marketing textbooks for uni-
Henrikki Tikkanen is a Professor of versity use and contributor to many
Entrepreneurship and Management at leading business journals. He is also a
the University of Kuopio, Finland. He network strategy consultant for Fin-
holds an M. Sc. and a Ph.D. in interna- land's largest retailer group.

You might also like