RESEARCH TITLE Year, Author and Source Participants of the Theoretical Instruments and Findings

Study framework Methodology

Sixteen participants This study investigated A mixed-methods The findings determined
(2018), Yang, Hyejin, Efficiency (15 Chinese and 1 efficiency of feedback approach was grammatical error rates significantly
The perception of of Online Grammar Checker in Korean) were from an online employed to collect decreased between the first and
online grammar English Writing Performance undergraduate grammar checker, data by using second drafts for Assignments 2 and
checkers and and Students’ Perceptions students majoring in SpellCheckPlus, by multiple 3. No significant differences in error
plagiarism diverse academic examining (1) instruments, such as rates were noted between the first
detectors on Grade Digital Object Identifier (DOI): disciplines, such as efficiency of feedback linguistic analysis of and second drafts for Assignment 1.
12 students in Holy http://journal.kasell.or.kr/xml/1 business, engineering, from the grammar three major Students’ perceptions towards
Child Catholic 5806/15806.pdf finance, etc checker in assignments and feedback from the grammar checker
School improvement of students’ responses found incorrect writing feedback and
grammar accuracy in to the pre- and post- students’ lack of proficiency
L2 students’ writing treatment influenced error correction.
and (2) students’ questionnaires. Questionnaire responses
perceptions towards determined students displayed
the grammar checker relatively positive attitudes toward
as a language learning the grammar checker, while
tool. incorrect feedback hindered the
level of the trustworthiness toward
this feedback

REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE MATRIX

 RESEARCH TITLE Year, Author and Source
(2019), Ruth O’neill and Alex M.T
The perception of Russel, Journal of Academic
online grammar Language & Learning Vol. 13, No.
checkers and 1, 2019, A88-A107. ISSN 1835-
plagiarism detectors 5196
on Grade 12 students
in Holy Child Catholic Digital Object Identifier (DOI):
School https://journal.aall.org.au/index.
php/jall/article/view/591/43543
5452
Participants of the Theoretical framework Instruments and Findings
Study Methodology
Six academic learning This study builds on A mixed method design Statistical analysis showed
advisors completed a O’Neill and Russell’s was applied with three that the advisors using
survey about their (2019) analysis of advisors surveyed on Grammarly agreed with all
perceptions of the student perceptions ‘of the perceived 15 statements about the
grammar feed-back Grammarly at one usefulness of incorpo- effectiveness of their
they provided to 76 multi-campus Australian rating Grammarly grammar instruction, and
students. Thirty-seven university by evaluating feedback into student for 13 of these
students were Academic Learning assessments (n=51),and statements, their mean
undergraduate, 24 Advisors’(ALAs)percepti another three advisors scores were significantly
students were ons of Grammarly and surveyed on providing higher than those of
postgraduate and 15 comparing its grammar feedback on advisors not using
were Direct Entry performance with the assignments using Word Grammarly.
students traditional feedback (n=25).
method using Word.
 RESEARCH TITLE Year, Author and Source
(2021), Hee-Joo Im, Journal
of Digital Convergence Vol.
The perception of
19. No. 1, pp. 51-58, 2021
online grammar
checkers and
plagiarism detectors
Digital Object Identifier
on Grade 12 students
(DOI):
in Holy Child Catholic
https://www.koreascience.
School
or.kr/article/JAKO20211026
5884491.pdf
Participants of the Study
The study was conducted in
the second semester of 2019
at D
University in Chungcheong-
do, with a total of 35 first-
year students participating in
the study.
Theoretical framework Instruments and Findings
Methodology
The purpose of the For data First, based on the results of
study is to examine collection, pre and the English grammar test, the
online grammar post grammar tests,
online grammar checker was
checkers and suggest questionnaires, and found to be effective in
when they could learning journals English writing class. Second,
be used in English were collected and
students judged whether
writing classes analyzed.
accepting or not rather than
accepting feedback provided
by online grammar checker.
Third, among the feedback
provided by the online
grammar checker, the order
of (in)definite article,
preposition, punctuation, verb
number, and noun number
were found.
 RESEARCH TITLE Year, Author and Source Participants of the Theoretical framework Instruments and Findings
Study Methodology

(2005), Ruth Barett, Journal for Students analyses ten This report describes a The questionnaire It has been found that
the Enhancement of Learning different scenarios for tutorial on plagiarism and subsequent students actively participate
The perception of
and Teaching – volume 2 issue 1 acceptable practice and, and collusion that has discussion take place because they can relate to the
online grammar
if unacceptable, they been used successfully in an environment in different situations in which
checkers and
decide whether in Computer Science which issues around they might find themselves.
plagiarism detectors
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): plagiarism or collusion and Psychology. The plagiarism and Lecturers can pick up on
on Grade 12 students
https://uhra.herts.ac.uk/bitstrea has taken place. questionnaire was collusion can be points raised in the
in Holy Child Catholic
m/handle/2299/2583/902907.p originally designed to discussed openly. questionnaire and by the
School
df?sequence=1&isAllowed=y investigate staff and students
student perceptions of
plagiarism and collusion
(Barrett and Cox, 2005)
and an amended
version has continued
to be useful in raising
students’ awareness of
plagiarism and
collusion.
 RESEARCH TITLE Year, Author and Source
(2006), Maureen M. Dawson and
Joyce A. Overfield,
The perception of
online grammar Plagiarism: Do Students Know
checkers and What It Is? Bioscience Education,
bioscience students
plagiarism detectors 8:1, 1-15,
from Level 0, that is,
on Grade 12 students
Foundation level, to
in Holy Child Catholic
School Digital Object Identifier (DOI):
10.3108/beej.8.1
https://doi.org/10.3108/beej.8.1
Participants of the Theoretical framework Instruments and Findings
Study Methodology
A scenario-based The ability of students A questionnaire was The MCQs showed that
questionnaire was to plagiarise coursework devised which students at all levels were
given to assessments has been a contained three MCQs aware that plagiarism should
undergraduate topic of much debate in (Multiple Choice be avoided but were not
recent years. The Questions) and six case- always clear as to why certain
consequences of study scenarios based actions constitute plagiarism.
plagiarism for students on actual experience
Level 3. may be devastating, within Bioscience. The
since their failure to MCQs included
learn and use questions on the
appropriate study skills definition of plagiarism,
will affect both their why plagiarism is wrong
university experience and what constitutes
and their subsequent collusion.
career. This project set
A complete version of
out to investigate
the plagiarism
students’ perceptions of
questionnaire is
what constitutes
provided as
plagiarism
supplementary
material.