Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Course Module
So what is Good Will then, Kant means to act out of a sense of moral obligation or "duty".
The German Scholar believed that the Eternal Law “do good and avoid evil” is inherent in man,
meaning that there is goodness in every man that no matter how evil they are, the tendency to do
good or wanting something good is innate in man. The will is his ability to pursue his good with
help of human reason but then again the goodness or badness of an act lies in the purpose why
had he done it. Not all good acts are good in itself such as a politician doling out goods to typhoon
victims or an adversary delivering a eulogy to a fallen opponent. Good Will is the reason why he
made such action and the ends he wanted to achieve upon doing it.
Kant’s Categorical Imperative
This philosophy of Immanuel Kant is a derivation of The Golden Rule mentioned in the
Chinese Classics “Do not do unto to others what you do not want others to do unto you”. In his
case he “Act only in accordance with that maxim through which you can at the same time will that
it become a universal law”. To sum it up that is a command or an imperative. There are two kinds
of imperatives hypothetical and categorical, let us differentiate. The former are commands that are
dependent on the goals to be fulfilled. These are commands that apply only in particular
circumstances, for particular people who happen to have these desires, these goals. Examples are
brushing your teeth to avoid bad breath, go to school to fulfill your scholastic needs and the likes.
Categorical Imperatives are commands that are universal and impartial. It encompasses every
reasonable being regardless of their origin, culture or social standing and at the same time they
have to perform these in respect for the dignity of everyone which devoid of their bias or
inclinations. Universal Love is an example of Categorical Imperative, World Peace is another.
The Kingdom of Ends
Immanuel Kant believed in the dignity of human reason but also of the free will. As
mentioned in past modules man is endowed with free will and human reason to decide but if they
are coerced then their freedom of choice is hampered making them less of a human being. Dignity
of man should not be compromised. The Kingdom of ends is the idea of a state equal to Sir
Thomas More’s Utopia. Kant defines it as, "a systematic union of different rational beings through
common laws". But is it attainable? He believed it is because as long as men think the same way
which he deemed as “categorical imperative” it is attainable. The Kingdom of ends has three
ingredients: the members, the sovereign, and the private ends which the members have. The
members refer to reasonable free-willed persons, who obey universal laws. They are ends in
themselves and are willing to spread their ideals to others absent of personal biases. The
sovereign is perceived to be God for he is not subject to any law but has no “power” to break the
law itself he is a role-model that the members will subscribe to. The private ends of the members
are the goals they wanted to achieve that will benefit everyone that might refer to categorical
imperatives. In this kingdom, human degradation, slavery and exploitation for the private ends
they wanted to attain are for everyone’s benefit.
References and Supplementary Materials
Books and Journals
1. Babor, Eddie R.; Ethics – The Philosophical Discipline of Action; Manile, Rex Book
Store
2. Montemayor, Felix; Ethics the Philippines; Navotas Metro Manila; National Book
Store
Online Supplementary Reading Materials
1. Ethical Traditions;
www.qcc.cuny.edu/SocialSciences/ppecorino/MEDICAL_ETHICS_TEXT/Chapter_2_Et
hical_Traditions/Categorical_Imperatives.htm; 2002
2. The Kingdom of Ends; https://limnk.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-010-
3099-1_26;
Written by:
Christopher S. Espiritu
AMACC Caloocan Campus
Course Module