Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ASSIGNMENT 3
IT INVESTMENT
PREPARED FOR:
PREPARED BY:
Technology(IT) will not long to be important as the strategic become less for firm’s
sustainability. This is because IT become common and anyone can easily afford to access, and it
seems that IT is available surrounding us. As the rapid growth of IT, most firm concern on IT
investment as the potential for a greater competitive advantage without considering risk. Thus,
Carr emphasizes that huge IT investment doesn’t guarantee any opportunities in the competitive
market besides small IT investment may result in a positive opportunity in the future competitive
market.
Firstly, Carr’s argument was IT has no inherent value when IT transform into a
commodity. He focused on the components of IT such as hardware, software and even the
process of IT has not any inherent value. The acquisition of components of IT is just waste of
money without considering the effective use of IT. This is because Carr advice to not overspend
on IT but do maintain and manage the risk level. From the point of Sarup, he stated that IT still
provides the value if IT being used in an innovative way. By effective and efficient use of IT, it
will create the possibilities for gain the opportunities to differentiate other competitors in the
marketplace. Sarup forces his argument that effective and efficiency use of IT provides more
Strategic advantages comprise from how the IT been used in the competitive market.
The firm can also set advantage and act on possibilities before other competitors do enhance the
differentiate in the marketplace and generate the profit. For example, by understanding and
analyzing the way to use IT in order to fulfill the business requirement which should create the
business intelligence with customized such as CRM and ERP for greater customer’s satisfaction
and enhance firm’s performance. Although for the most firms, they keep adapting the change of
IT for survival in long-term market. The firm must understand and analyses the business process
to fulfil requirement before the implementation on IT takes place to give a huge competitive
advantage.
Next, the firm needs to keep tracking the evolution in advanced IT to prevent the failure of
business to survive in future. Carr also argues that early build-out stage of IT acts as proprietary
technologies and end of buildout phase became infrastructural technologies. The proprietary
provides a competitive advantage because it is unique and has the barrier to another competitor
to increase the benefit. The factors that transform from the proprietary technology into
infrastructural technology is the transport mechanisms which carries the digital information as
similar railroad and power. Lastly, price deflation also essential as a vanishing advantage when
IT becomes affordable to acquire as an application. Sarup has commented that Carr mistakenly
make by the difference between IT and early stage of infrastructural technologies. Sarup
explained that there will be always new technology arises by the rapid growth of the pace
according to the change in IT in order to create greater differentiate. Otherwise, the advantages
of the first mover who willing to take a risk and gain the competitive edge. For example,
Amazon company is the first company that conducts business based on the website to allocate
Furthermore, Carr also stated that IT also increase replicable from other competitors
because it will vanish the long-term competitive advantages. When IT being outdated, the firm
will be outsourced from the third party instead of building its own IT application. Sarup argues
that IT alone couldn’t ensure that the advantages but also need to consider information
capabilities in IT itself. Beyond of using the IT applications, it’s better to use the source of
advantages by continuing satisfying the customer ‘s needs. Thus, firms need to understand and
make analyses of customer, product, services, process and find a way on how to integrate IT to
in the integration of different complimentary resources to facilitate better IT values for the firm.
in customized and developed in-house software. Thus, increase generic application among the
competitor. Next, is the involvement of Internet provides the perfect delivery channel for generic
application which easily outsourcing from the third party based on the “web-service “. In simple
word, IT has been converted as a utility. Most of the firm will find an alternative for gain from
infrastructural technology, it does not give a long-term sustainable competitive edge. From the
Sarup explanation, common infrastructural technologies do not decrease the competitive but
increase it. Sarup manifest to not only focus on software application but also proceed to
alignment in business process and practices. He forces that the importance of business processes
In the conclusion, the firm concern more in cost saving and risk assessment but at the
same time, they want competitive advantage by increasing the firm’s performance. That’s why
Carr didn’t mention that IT is not important but just be aware of investing in IT. Other
opponents, Sarup gives brief on the mixture of IT resources and capabilities that will deeply
provide a sustainable differentiation. This deeply embedded firm has a lot to consider which in
influencing the competitive edge such differentiation product, efficient use of IT information,
innovation, alignment business process, right business strategic, involvement of IT and internet
and understand customer’s satisfaction. Last but not least, the firm cannot have expected the
benefit in short-term after investing on IT. It may take a longer time to produce the outcome.
From my analyses on the whole article review, I can summarize that “Don’t spend more in IT,