Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Ali Saadedine Peer Review #Id: 202100295

    Uploaded by

    ali saadedine
    2 views2 pages
    The author discusses their experience with conducting a peer review for the first time. They felt responsible for providing constructive feedback that could help their colleague improve their paper. The most challenging part was that the paper was not written as an exploratory essay, as it did not raise a question or cite articles to answer a question. Through peer review, the author learned to think more critically about other people's work and hone their own critical analysis skills. The author also discusses their experience receiving a peer review, in which they were surprised to only receive a couple constructive notes and refused to change an opening sentence as suggested. Overall, the author found peer review beneficial as it encourages critical analysis and provides more regular feedback than from just a professor.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    peer review

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The author discusses their experience with conducting a peer review for the first time. They felt responsible for providing constructive feedback that could help their colleague improve their paper. The most challenging part was that the paper was not written as an exploratory essay, as it did not raise a question or cite articles to answer a question. Through peer review, the author learned to think more critically about other people's work and hone their own critical analysis skills. The author also discusses their experience receiving a peer review, in which they were surprised to only receive a couple constructive notes and refused to change an opening sentence as suggested. Overall, the author found peer review beneficial as it encourages critical analysis and provides more regular feedback than from just a professor.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    Ali Saadedine Peer Review #Id: 202100295

    Uploaded by

    ali saadedine
    The author discusses their experience with conducting a peer review for the first time. They felt responsible for providing constructive feedback that could help their colleague improve their paper. The most challenging part was that the paper was not written as an exploratory essay, as it did not raise a question or cite articles to answer a question. Through peer review, the author learned to think more critically about other people's work and hone their own critical analysis skills. The author also discusses their experience receiving a peer review, in which they were surprised to only receive a couple constructive notes and refused to change an opening sentence as suggested. Overall, the author found peer review beneficial as it encourages critical analysis and provides more regular feedback than from just a professor.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    Ali Saadedine Peer Review #ID: 202100295

    Before doing the peer review, I wasn't sure how I would feel while evaluating another

    person's paper. This is primarily because I haven't done a peer review before in my educational

    journey. While assessing my colleague's paper, I felt responsible because he might consider my

    constructive feedback. I felt how it is difficult to evaluate someone and discover how he is

    thinking regardless of whether it is right or wrong. Through providing peer evaluation, I was able

    to improve my work and consider it more flexibly. For example, after reading my peer paper, the

    conditions and steps of writing an exploratory essay were automatically reviewed in my mind,

    and I was exposed to some mistakes that I may fall in. Moreover, the most challenging aspect I

    faced while evaluating my peer's draft was that he wasn't writing an exploratory essay because he

    didn't raise a question and didn't start his research by reading articles to reach an answer to his

    question. This was challenging because I was obliged to introduce to him the explanatory essay

    and what steps to follow in writing such an essay. Finally, peer review encouraged me to think

    critically about other people's work, and It also aided me in honing my critical skills while

    evaluating another colleague's work.

    When I knew that a peer would evaluate me, I was curious because my peer would

    identify my mistakes and help me improve and develop my essay and get a high grade. After I

    received the evaluation of my peer, I was surprised that she loved what I wrote, and she gave me

    only a couple of constructive notes. For example, my peer opened my eyes to some grammatical

    and APA mistakes, which I fixed. Moreover, my peer mentioned that I should revise my opinion

    statements that introduce the benefits of sports with an opening sentence that shows the

    relationship between males and females with marks. I refused to change this opening sentence

    because its purpose is to show the benefits of sports that both genders should enjoy. Finally, I
    Ali Saadedine Peer Review #ID: 202100295

    find this activity beneficial because it helps obtain more regular feedback than when the

    professor is the only person presenting it. It encourages us to participate in critical analysis.

    You might also like