You are on page 1of 5

Available online at www.sciencedirect.

com

ScienceDirect
Procedia CIRP 63 (2017) 610 – 614

The 50th CIRP Conference on Manufacturing Systems

Optimization of Machining Parameters in Turning of AISI 4340 Steel under


Cryogenic Condition Using Taguchi Technique
Sanchit Kumar Kharea*, Sanjay Agarwalb
a
Department of Mechanical Engineering,Institute of Technology and Management,Gida,Gorakhpur 273209,India
b
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Bundelkhand Institute of Engineering and Technology,Jhansi 284128,India
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +91-551-224-2154; .E-mail address:sanchitkhare@yahoo.com

Abstract

This experimental research on cryogenic turning process involves the modelling and optimization of the process parameters affecting the
machining performance and value oriented sustainable manufacturing. In the present work, the machining parameters namely the cutting speed,
feed rate, depth of cut and rake angle are optimized for minimum surface roughness on AISI 4340 steel. The experimentation was planned
XVLQJ7DJXFKL¶V/WKHRU\ An orthogonal array (L9), the signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio, and the Qualitek-4 were employed to the study the surface
roughness in the turning of AISI 4340 steel under cryogenic condition. It was observed that cutting speed and depth of cut was the most
influential factors on the surface roughness. To validate the study, confirmation experiment has been carried out at optimum set of parameters
and predicted results have been found to be in good agreement with experimental findings. The results have revealed that cryogenic machining
has yielded better surface finish.

©©2017
2017TheTheAuthors. Published
Authors. by Elsevier
Published B.V.B.V.
by Elsevier This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Peer-review under responsibility ofthe scientific committee of The 50th CIRP Conference on Manufacturing Systems.
Peer-review under responsibility of the scientific committee of The 50th CIRP Conference on Manufacturing Systems
Keywords: Cryogenic Turning; Surface roughness; Taguchi method

1. Introduction removal rates. Tool wear was also observed to be uniform


and predictable.
Traditionally and historically, manufacturing processes are (3) Enhanced surface quality: cryogenically machined
planned and developed in order to achieve either metal and hardened steel parts showed reduced surface and
maximum productivity or minimum cost. In contrast, subsurface damage, and improved fatigue resistance.
present trends push manufacturers to develop new Compressive residual stresses and white layer
methodologies incorporating sustainability concepts [1]. characteristics have also been shown to improve with
Surface integrity of machined components has a major cryogenic cooling.
impact on their functional performance [ 2]. Sustainable (4) Step reduction and process change: cryogenic cooling
manufacturing processes are those which demonstrate results in more economical machining in the fully heat-
improved environmental impact and energy and resource treated condition for most parts, allowing intermediate
efficiency, generate minimum quantity of wastes, provide heat-treating steps to be eliminated.
operational safety and personal health, while maintaining In setting the machining parameters, the main goal is the
or improving the product quality [3]. Cryogenic machining minimum surface roughness. The setting of machining
imparts several improvements that can be categorized as: parameters relies strongly on the experience of operators
(1)Environmentally friendly and safe: Nitrogen is a non and machining parameters tables provided by machine tool
hazardous gas that constitutes 79% of atmospheric air. builders. It is difficult to utilize the optimal functions of a
(2) High productivity: both the hardness and toughness of machine owing to their being too many adjustable
the cutting tool materials have been shown to increase machining parameters.
under cryogenic cooling, allowing increased material

2212-8271 © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Peer-review under responsibility of the scientific committee of The 50th CIRP Conference on Manufacturing Systems
doi:10.1016/j.procir.2017.03.166
Sanchit Kumar Khare and Sanjay Agarwal / Procedia CIRP 63 (2017) 610 – 614 611

2. Literature Review vibrations along three axes were chosen for in-process
surface roughness prediction system. By using multiple
Paul et al [4] investigated the effects of cryogenic cooling regression and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) a strong
in machining of AISI 1060 steel with carbide inserts and linear relationship among the parameters (feed rate and
compared the effectiveness of cryogenic cooling with that vibration measured in three axes) and the response (surface
of dry machining and conventional cutting fluids. roughness) was found. The authors demonstrated that
Experimental results indicate that cryogenic cooling spindle speed and depth of cut might not necessarily have
provided reduced tool wear and improved surface finish, to be fixed for an effective surface roughness prediction
compared to dry and wet operations. model.
Zhou et al. (1995) [5] investigated on tool life criteria in Ramakrishnan and Karunamoorthy [12] developed an
cryogenic turning. A new tool-life criterion depending on a Artificial Neural Network (ANN) by using Inconel 718 as
pattern-recognition technique was proposed and neural work material to predict the performance characteristics
network and wavelet techniques were used to realize the namely MRR and surface
new criterion. The experimental results showed that this URXJKQHVV EDVHG RQ 7DJXFKL¶V / RUWKRJRQDO DUUD\ 7KH
criterion was applicable to tool condition monitoring in a response by optimized concurrently using multi-response
wide range of cutting conditions. signal-to-noise (MRSN) ratio in DGGLWLRQ WR 7DJXFKL¶V
Lin et al. (2001) [6] adopted an abdicative network to parametric design approach. ANOVA was employed to
construct a prediction model for surface roughness and identify the level of importance of the machining
MRR. Once the process parameters: cutting speed, feed parameters on the multi-performance characteristics.
rate and depth of cut were given; the surface roughness From the literature, it is observed that researchers have
and MRR could be predicted by this network. Regression already worked in the area of cryogenic turning
analysis was also adopted as second prediction model for technology.
surface roughness and MRR.
Feng and Wang (2002) [7] investigated for the prediction In recent years, along with other types of steels, AISI
of surface roughness in finish cryogenic turning operation 4340 steel has also emerged as an important material for
by developing an empirical model through considering industrial applications. Despite extensive research on
working parameters: work piece hardness (material), feed, cryogenic turning process, determining the desirable
cutting tool point angle, depth of cut, spindle speed, and operating conditions during cryogenic turning of AISI
cutting time. Data mining techniques, nonlinear regression 4340 steel, in industrial setting, still relies on the skill of
analysis with logarithmic data transformation were the operators and trial-and-error methods. So the aim of
employed for developing the empirical model to predict the present work is to obtain the optimum machining
the surface roughness.
conditions for cryogenic turning of AISI 4340 steel, for
Suresh et al. (2002) [8]focused on machining mild steel by
minimizing the surface roughness based on Taguchi
TiN-coated tungsten carbide(CNMG) cutting tools for
technique. Experiments were carried out to study the
developing a surface roughness prediction model by using
Response Surface Methodology (RSM). Genetic effect of various parameters viz. speed, feed, depth of
Algorithms (GA) used to optimize the objective function cut and rake angle on the surface finish. The levels of
and compared with RSM results. It was observed that GA significance on the surface roughness were statistically
program provided minimum and maximum values of evaluated by using Qualitek-4.
surface roughness and their respective optimal machining
conditions. 3. Experiment
Lee and Chen (2003) [9] highlighted on artificial neural The experimental studies were performed on a High-
networks (OSRR-ANN) using a sensing technique to power rigid lathe machine tool. The composition of AISI
monitor the effect of vibration produced by the motions of 4340 steel work-piece material used for experimentation
the cutting tool and work piece during the cutting process in this work is a given in table 1. HSS T-42, S-400 (CT)
developed an on-line surface recognition system. The Ǝ[ Ǝ VLQJOH SRLQW WXUQLQJ WRRO was used in the
authors employed tri-axial accelerometer for determining experiments. The parameters, selected for different
the direction of vibration that significantly affected surface settings of speed, feed, depth of cut and rake angle were
roughness then analyzed by using a statistical method and used in the experiments (Table 2). The photographic
compared prediction accuracy of both the ANN and SMR. view of the machining zone has been shown in fig.1 (a).
Choudhury and Bartarya (2003) [10] focused on design of The other details of the experimentation have been
experiments and the neural network for prediction of tool shown in Table 3. The surface roughness was measured
wear. The input parameters were cutting speed, feed and by with Stylus-type profilometer, Talysurf (Taylor
depth of cut; flank wear, surface finish and cutting zone Hobson, Surtronic 3+) on the work-piece after machining.
temperature were selected as outputs. Empirical relation Stylus-type profilometer has been shown in fig.1 (b).
between different responses and input variables and also
through neural network (NN) program helped in Table-1 Chemical composition of AISI D3 steel (wt %)
predictions for all the three response variables and
compared which method was best for the prediction.
Kirby et al. (2004) [11] developed the prediction model for AISI C-0.382, S-0.022, P-0.026, Si-0.228, Mn-0.609,
4340
surface roughness in turning operation. The regression Cr-0.995, Ni-1.514, Mo- 0.226, Fe-95.998
model was developed by a single cutting parameter and
612 Sanchit Kumar Khare and Sanjay Agarwal / Procedia CIRP 63 (2017) 610 – 614

Table-2 Machining settings used in the experiments purpose of designing and improving the product quality
[13,14]. In the Taguchi method, process parameters which
Process variables influence the products are separated into two main groups:
Values Cutting Speed Feed Depth of Rake control factors and noise factors. The control factors are
in (N) Rate(f) cut(d) (mm) angle used to select the best conditions for stability in design or
coded (rpm) (mm/rev) (Į manufacturing process, whereas the noise factors denote
form
all factors that cause variation.
L1 50 0.045 0.2 4 According to Taguchi based methodology, the
L2 150 0.090 0.4 8 characteristic that the smaller value indicates the better
L3 250 0.135 0.6 12 machining performance, such as Surface roughness is
addressed as the-smaller-the-better type of problem. The
615DWLRLHȘFDQEHFDOFXODWHGDVVKRZQEHORZ
Table-3 Fixed parameters Smaller-the-better
Ș -10 log ( ) (1)
Work piece AISI 4340 steel rod

Coolant Liquid nitrogen 4. Results and Discussion


The experimental results are collected for surface
roughness and 9 experiments were conducted using
(a)
Taguchi (L9) experimental design methodology and
there are two replicates for each experiment to obtain
S/N values. In the present study all the designs, plots
and analysis have been carried out using Minitab
statistical software. Lower amount of surface roughness
show the high productivity of cryogenic turning.
Therefore, small the better are applied to calculate the
S/N ratio of surface roughness respectively.
Regardless of category of the performance
FKDUDFWHULVWLFVDJUHDWHUȘYDOXHFRUUHVSRQGVWRDEHWWHU
performance. Therefore, optimal level with the greatest
Ș YDOXH By DSSO\LQJ (TV   7KH Ș YDOXHV IRU HDFK
experiment of L9 (table 3) was calculated in Table 5.
(b)
The optimal machining performance for SR was
obtained as 50 rpm cutting speed (Level 1), 0.045
mm/rev feed rate(Level 1), 0.2 mm depth of cut (Level
1) and 40rake angle (Level 1) settings that give the
minimum SR. Fig. 2 shows the effect of machining
parameters on the SR.

Table-4 Experimental design using L9 orthogonal array

Exp Factor Assignment Ra S/N Ratio


No (μm) (db)
N F d Į

1 50 0.045 0.2 4 0.97 0.2646

2 50 0.090 0.4 8 3.95 -11.9319

3 50 0.135 0.6 12 5.66 -15.0563


Fig 1 (a) Machining zone (b) Stylus-type profilometer
4 150 0.045 0.4 12 7.02 -16.9267

5 150 0.090 0.6 4 7.08 -17.0007


3.1 Design of experiment based on Taguchi method
6 150 0.135 0.2 8 6.42 -16.1507

To evaluate the effects of cutting parameters of cryogenic 7 250 0.045 0.6 8 5.66 -15.0563

turning process in terms of cutting performance 8 250 0.090 0.2 12 2.40 -7.6042
characteristics such as Surface Roughness a Taguchi 250 0.135 0.4 4 3.66 -11.2696
9
method used here to model the cryogenic turning process.
In this study, Taguchi method, a powerful tool for
parameter design of performance characteristics, for the
Sanchit Kumar Khare and Sanjay Agarwal / Procedia CIRP 63 (2017) 610 – 614 613

Table5. Response Table for S/N ratio the SR are speed and depth of cut. The percent
contributions of the machining parameters on the SR are
shown in Table 7. Speed is found to be the major factor
affecting the SR (50.847%). The percent contribution of
depth of cut and rake angle on the SR are 30.915%,
6.415% respectively.

6.415%
50.84%

30.915%

Fig. 3. Percent Contribution of Control factors for SR

4.1 Confirmation experiment

The confirmation experiment is performed by conducting a


Fig.2. Factor effects on S/N ratio for SR
test using a specific combination of the factors and levels
The relative importance of the machining parameters with previously evaluated. The sample size of confirmation
respect to the SR was investigated to determine more experiment is larger than the sample size of any specific
accurately the optimum combinations of the machining trial in the previous factorial experiment. The final step of
parameters by using Qualitek-4. The results of Qualitek-4 WKH7DJXFKL¶VSDUDPHWHUGHVLJQDIWHUVHOHFWLQJWKHRSWLPDO
for the machining outputs are presented in Tables 5 and 6. parameters is to be predict any verify
Statistically, F-test provides a decision at some confidence the improvement of the performance characteristics with
level as to whether these estimates the selected optimal machining parameters [15]. The
are significantly different. Larger F-value indicates that the predicted S/N ratio using the optimal levels of the
variation of the process parameter makes a big change on machining parameters can be calculated with the help of
the performance characteristics. F-values of the machining following prediction equation:
parameters are compared with the appropriate confidence
Table. Șopt Șm+ Șj- Șm)
+HUHȘopt LVWKHSUHGLFWHGRSWLPDO61UDWLRȘ m is the total
PHDQ RI WKH 61 UDWLRV Șj is the mean S/N ratio of at
Table 6. Result of Qualitek-4 for SR optimal levels and k is the number of main design
parameters that affect the quality characteristics. The
results of experimental confirmation using optimal
machining parameters are shown in Tables 8. From the
above observations, it can be interpreted that the obtained

Table-8 Confirmation experiment result for SR

At least 95% confidence Optimum machining parameters


Table 7. Pooled of Qualitek-4 for SR Predicted Experiment

Level N1f1d1 Į1 N1f1d1 Į1

S/N ratio for -24.02 -25.3


SR (db)

At least 95% confidence SR has reasonable accuracy for resulting model because an
error of 5.32% for S/N ratio of SR is measured.
According to F-test analysis, the significant parameters on
614 Sanchit Kumar Khare and Sanjay Agarwal / Procedia CIRP 63 (2017) 610 – 614

5. Conclusion algorithmic approach for optimization of surface roughness prediction


PRGHO´ ,QWHUQDWLRQDO -RXUQDO RI 0DFKLQH 7RROV DQG 0DQXIDFWXUH
Volume 42, (2002), pp. 675±680.
This paper described the optimization of the cryogenic [9] /HH 6 6 DQG &KHQ - & ³2QOLQH VXUIDFH URXJKQHVV UHFRJQLWLRQ
turning process using parametric design of Taguchi V\VWHP XVLQJ DUWLILFLDO QHXUDO QHWZRUNV V\VWHP LQ WXUQLQJ RSHUDWLRQV´
methodology. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Volume
22, (2003), pp. 498±509
,W ZDV REVHUYHG WKDW WKH 7DJXFKL¶V
[10] Choudhury S. K. and BartDU\D*³5ROHRIWHPSHUDWXUHDQGVXUIDFH
parameter design is a simple, systematic, reliable, and finish in predicting tool wear using neural network and design of
more efficient tool for optimization of the machining H[SHULPHQWV´ ,QWHUQDWLRQDO -RXUQDO RI 0DFKLQH 7RROV DQG 0DQXIDFWXUH
parameters. The effect of various machining parameter Volume 43, (2003),pp. 747±753
[11@ .LUE\ ( ' =KDQJ = DQG &KHQ - & ³'HYelopment of An
such as cutting speed, feed rate, depth of cut and rake
Accelerometer based surface roughness Prediction System in Turning
angle has been studied though machining of AISI 4340 2SHUDWLRQ 8VLQJ 0XOWLSOH 5HJUHVVLRQ 7HFKQLTXHV´ -RXUQDO RI ,QGXVWULDO
steel. Technology, Volume 20, Number 4, (2004), pp. 1-8.
1. It was identified that the cutting speed and depth [12] 5DPNULVKDQDQ 5 DQG .DUXQDPRRUWK\ /³0RGHOOLng and multi-
response optimization of Inconel 718 on machining of CNC WEDM
of cut have influenced more than the other
SURFHVV´-RXUQDORI0DWHULDO3URFHVVLQJ7HFKQRORJ\9ROSS
parameters considered in this study. 343-349.
2. The confirmation experiment has been conducted. [13] 3KDGNH 06 ³4XDOLW\ HQJLQHHULQJ XVLQJ UREXVW GHVLJQ´3UHQWLFH
Result shows that the error associated with SR is Hall, Eaglewood liffs,1989.
[14] Ross, P.J., ³7DJXFKL7HFKQLTXHVIRU4XDOLW(QJLQHHULQJ´P0F*UDZ-
only 5.32 %.
Hill, New York1988).
The selection of optimum values is essential for the [15] +XQJ -7 /LR  <6  ³2SWLPL]DWLRQ RI PDFKLQLQJ SDUDPHWHUV RI
process manufacturing system. Thus the optimized Wire- ('0 EDVHG RQ JUH\ UHODWLRQDO DQG VWDWLVWLFDO DQDO\VLV´ ,QW - RI
condition, not only makes the cryogenic turning a more Production Research, 2003, Vol. 41/8, pp. 1707-1720.
commercially viable process for industrial applications, but
also turns a spotlight on cryogenic turning process as a
promising field for further advancements.

Acknowledgement

I express my sincere thanks to Associate Professor Dr


Sanjay Agarwal, Department of Mechanical Engineering,
BIET, Jhansi for providing me the necessary facilities in
the department. I sincerely appreciate my advisor for
giving me the opportunity to explore this topic. I have
learned and improved a lot with your encouragement,
insightful advices, and guidance in last three years. Your
suggestions, effort, time, and energy help me develop the
ideas that made the research a success.

References

[1] Jovane F, Yoshikawa H, Alting L, Boer CR, Westkamper E, Williams


D, Tseng M,Seliger G, Paci AM The Incoming Global Technological and
Industrial Revolution Towards Competitive Sustainable Manufacturing.
CIRP Annals ±Manufacturing Technology (2008) 57(2):641±659.
[2] Jawahir I.S., Brinksmeier, E., M'Saoubi, R., Aspinwall, D.K., Outeiro,
J.C., Meyer, D., Umbrello, D., Jayal, A.D.,. Surface integrity in material
removal processes: Recent advances, CIRP Annals - Manufacturing
Technology 60, 2011 p. 603- 626.
[3] Jayal AD, Badurdeen F, Dillon Jr OW, Jawahir IS Sustainable
Manufacturing: Modeling and Optimization Challenges at the Product,
Process and System Levels. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and
Technology (2010) 2(3):144±152.
[4] Paul S Dhar N. R. and FKDWWRSDGK\D\ $% ³ %HQHILFLDO HIfects of
cryogenic cooling over dry & wet machining on tool wear & surface
ILQLVK LQ WXUQLQJ RI $,6,  VWHHO´ -RXUQDO RI 0DWHULDO 3URFHVVLQJ
Technology,vol.116,2001,pp.44-48.
[5] =KRX 4 +RQJ * 6 DQG 5DKPDQ 0 ³$ 1HZ 7RRO /LIH &ULWHULRQ
For Tool CoQGLWLRQ 0RQLWRULQJ 8VLQJ D 1HXUDO 1HWZRUN´ (QJLQHHULQJ
Application Artificial Intelligence, Volume 8, Number 5, (1995), pp.
579-588.
[6@/LQ:6/HH%<:X&/³0RGHOLQJWKHVXUIDFHURXJKQHVVDQG
FXWWLQJ IRUFH IRU WXUQLQJ´ -RXUQDO RI 0DWHULDOV Processing Technology,
Volume 108, (2001), pp. 286-293.
[7@)HQJ&; -DFN DQG:DQJ;³'HYHORSPHQWRI(PSLULFDO0RGHOV
IRU 6XUIDFH 5RXJKQHVV 3UHGLFWLRQ LQ )LQLVK 7XUQLQJ´ ,QWHUQDWLRQDO
Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Volume 20, (2002),
pp. 348±356
[8@ 6XUHVK 3 9 6 5DR 3 9 DQG 'HVKPXNK 6 * ³$ JHQHWLF

You might also like