ECU High Performance Charrette

College Hill Phase I

This report is a summary of the
High Performance Charrette
conducted at East Carolina University - Greenville
on June 19, 2003

Funding provided by:

State Energy Office, N.C. Department of Administration
and
The U.S. Department of Energy, with State Energy
Program funds
in cooperation with Triangle J Council of Governments

Other sponsors:

ECU Facilities Division

Alicia Ravetto, AIA – Architect

Brown and Jones Architects
Burt Hill Kosar Rittelmann Associates
Design Harmony, Inc.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

East Carolina University selected Burt Hill Kosar

Rittelmann Associates to assist them in the design of
the new dormitory building College Hill Phase I. As
part of the early schematic design process for the
project, the University and Burt Hill Kosar
Rittelmann Associates embraced the idea of holding
a High Performance Charrette. A charrette is an
intensive, focused brainstorming session involving a
variety of experts, intended to provide an effective
means to identify realistic and cost-effective high
performance measures that could be implemented in
the facility’s design. Critical to the charrette and its
documentation was funding from the State Energy
Office, N.C. Department of Administration and the U.S. Department of Energy, with State
Energy Program funds in cooperation with
Triangle J Council of Governments. Ongoing
relationships with these partners, and with the
diverse and knowledgeable charrette
participants, will accrue additional benefits to
the University. These relationships will
continue to aid the University in meeting its
overall energy and environmental
commitments long after the College Hill Phase
I project has been established as a leader in the
field on the ECU campus.

The charrette took place on June 19, 2003 at

the Colliseum , ECU Greenville campus. Its
stated focus was to incorporate environmental
excellence and high performance in the design of the
College Hill Phase I by using the High Performance
Guidelines developed by the Triangle J Council of
Governments. In his welcoming remarks,
David Hatton, noted the importance of balancing
program and budget needs with high
performance/”green” priorities. Approximately 40
individuals participated from various backgrounds
and fields: the University (personnel, administration,
etc.), NC State University, UNC Chapel Hill, state
agencies, and private companies. Four distinct
environmental design areas were addressed in detail:
site & water, energy, materials, and indoor
environmental quality.

1
Local experts in “integrated design”, in the
Triangle J High Performance Guidelines and
LEED, and in each of the four design areas
added their expertise to the charrette. In
addition, representatives from Burt Hill Kosar
Rittelmann Associates and from the University
presented project information. ECU staff
shared their creative thoughts and ideas on the
new building while numerous other
participants were asked to join in the
brainstorming and to become “champions” of
the charrette results. Participants formed three
small work groups to address topics relevant to the College Hill Phase I Dormitory building.
Each group looked at all high performance issues of the project and set priorities that they felt
this project should address. At the conclusion of the day, all work groups presented the results of
their discussions and then collaborated to determine a handful of Priority Action Items. The
Priority Action Items determined by the Charrette participants are listed below.

Overall, the charrette proved to be fun and invigorating, and was filled with thoughtful insights
for a realistic and strategic approach to incorporating high performance strategies into the
renovation project. It laid good groundwork to expect that the design and construction of College
Hill Phase I will raise the “high performance bar” at East Carolina University.

Priority Actions
Actions Champions
ENERGY EFFICIENCY: The energy goal Chuck Gulledge, Engineer Moser Mayer
for the building shall be 10% better than Phoenix Associates (Design Team), Paul
ASHRAE 90.1 1999 Carlson (Facilities Services Mechanical
Engineer ECU)
HUMIDITY CONTROL: Compliance with Chuck Gulledge Engineer Moser Mayer
ASHRAE 62, minimum 30% Relative Phoenix Associates (Design Team), Paul
Humidity and maximum 60% Carlson (Facilities Services Mechanical
Engineer ECU)
EDUCATION “GREEN SUITES: Mark Kimball, (Facilities Mechanical Engineer
ECU) Jamie (ECU) Scott Sullivan, Project
Manager Burt Hill Kosar Rittelmann (Design
Team) Gina Shoemaker, Project Manager ECU
WATER USE REDUCTION: rainwater Sarah, John Gill, Landscape Architect ECU
catchment
MATERIALS: recycling construction and
demolition waste – involve occupants
Green roof
Light pollution

Thanks to all for making this High Performance Charrette a very fun and productive event!

2
CHARRETTE PARTICIPANTS

• Charles Gulledge, Director, Mechanical

Engineering, Moser Mayer Phoenix
Associates, 328 E. Market St.,
Greensboro NC 27401, phone 336-373-
9800, email gulledge@mmpa.com

• Gina Shoemaker, Project Manager, ECU,

1001 E. 4th St., Greenville NC 27858,
phone 252-328-6858, email
battenm@mail.ecu.edu

• Scott Sullivan, Project Manager, Burt

Hill Kosar Rittelmann, 1735 Market St.,
Philadelphia PA 19103, phone 215-751-2963, email scott.sullivan@burthill.com

• Gina Baker, Architect, Burt Hill Kosar Rittelmann, 1056 Thomas Jefferson St.,
Washington DC 20007, phone 202-333-2711, email gina.baker@burthill.com

• Mark Kimball, Facilities Mechanical Engineer, ECU, #3 Eppes Bldg., ECU, Greenville
NC 27858, phone 252-328-6776, email kimballm@mail.ecu.edu

• Rebecca Bizzell, Director, Resource Management, Campus Operations, ECU, 1001 E. 4th
St., Greenville NC 27858, phone 252-328-6858, email bizzelh@mail.ecu.edu

• Gay Perez, Assistant Director, University Housing, NC State University, Box 7315,
Raleigh NC 27695, phone 919-5115-3068, email gay_perez@ncsu.edu

• Barry Olson, Residential Life Coordinator, NC

State University, Box 7315, Raleigh NC 27695,
phone 919-513-7308, email
barry_olson@ncsu.edu

• Gary Thompson, Assistant Director, Facilities, NC

State University, Box 7315, Raleigh NC 27695,
phone 919-515-3040, email
gary_thompson@ncsu.edu

• Paul Carlson, Facilities Services Mechanical

Engineer, ECU, #3 Eppes Bldg., Greenville NC
27858, phone 252-328-6776, email
carlsonp@mail.ecu.edu

3
• Patrick Beville, Project Manager, Appalachian State University, 438 Academy St., Boone
NC 28608, phone 828-262-7332, email bevillepa@appstate.edu

• Stephen Atkinson, Project Manager, ECU, 1001 E. 4th St., Greenville NC 27858, phone
252-328-6858, email atkinsonst@mail.ecu.edu

• Robert Still, Project Manager, ECU, 1001 E. 4th St., Greenville NC 27858, phone
252-328-6858, email stillr@mail.ecu.edu

• Aaron Lucier, Associate Director, ECU, 100 Jones Hall, Greenville NC 27858, phone
252-328-2758, email luciera@mail.ecu.edu

• John Gill, Landscape Architect, ECU, Grounds Complex, Greenville NC 27858, phone
252-328-2490, email gillj@mail.ecu.edu

• Bill Clutter, Associate Vice Chancellor, ECU, 207 Mendenhall, Greenville NC 27858,
phone 252-328-2882, email clutterw@mail.ecu.edu

• Stephen Peay, Facilities Engineer, ECU, #3 Eppes Bldg., Greenville NC 27858, phone
252-328-6776, email peays@mail.ecu.edu

• Eugene Langford, Construction and Renovation Design Technician, ECU, Steam Plant,
Greenville NC 27858, phone 252-744-2382, email langforde@mail.ecu.edu

• Cindy Shea, Sustainability Coordinator, UNC-Chapel Hill, CB #1800, Chapel Hill NC

27599, phone 919-843-5251, email cpshea@fac.unc.edu

• Steve Lofgren, Assistant Director, Housing Department, UNC-Chapel Hill, CB #5500,

Chapel Hill NC 27514, phone 919-962-0755, email lofgren@email.unc.edu

• Joe Boehman, Assistant Director, Resident Education, UNC-Chapel Hill, CB #5500,

Chapel Hill NC 27514, phone 919-962-1588, email boehman@unc.edu

• Larry Hicks, Associate

Director, Housing and
Residential Education,
UNC-Chapel Hill, CB
#5500, Chapel Hill NC
27514, phone 919-962-
6420, email
hicks@email.unc.edu

• Tom Pohlman,
Environmental
Manager, ECU, 104
Browning, Greenville

4
 NC 27858, phone 252-328-6166, email pohlmant@mail.ecu.edu

• Todd Marshall, Project Manager,

ECU, 1001 E. 4th St., Greenville
NC 27858, phone 252-328-6858,
email marshals@mail.ecu.edu

• Jonathan Shambare, Architect,

ECU, 1001 E. 4th St., Greenville
NC 27858, phone 252-328-6858,
email shambarej@mail.ecu.edu

• Brad Moore, Architect, NC State

University, CB #7519, Raleigh
NC 27695, phone 919-513-1267,
email brad_moore@ncsu.edu

• David Hatton, Principal, Burt Hill Kosar Rittelmann, 1735 Market St., Philadelphia PA
19103, phone 215-751-2970, email david.hatton@burthill.com

• Marshall Mauney, Architect, State Construction Office, 1307 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh NC 27699, phone 919-733-7962, email marshall.mauney@ncmail.net

• Judy Kincaid, Solid Waste/Materials Resources Program Manager, Triangle J Council of

Governments, PO Box 12276, Research Triangle Park NC 27709, phone 919-558-9343,
email jkincaid@tjcog.org

• Charles Brown, Principal, Brown & Jones, 701 N. Person St., Raleigh NC 27604, phone
919-831-2625, email charles@brownandjones.com

• Alicia Ravetto, Principal, Alicia Ravetto AIA, 400 W. Weaver St., Carrboro NC 27510,
phone 919-933-0999, email ravetto@mindspring.com

• Gail Lindsey, Principal, Design Harmony, 4429 Trommel Ct., Wake Forest NC 27587,
phone 919-562-7085, email glindsey@ipass.net

5
CHARRETTE GOALS and PROCESS

Charrette Goals:

1. Inform and educate charrette participants about the energy and

environmental implications of designing a new building on the
ECU-Greenville campus. At the same time, clarify the
“integrated approach” concept, encouraging the effective use of
the Triangle J Council of Government High Performance
Guidelines to help define and implement high performance
strategies.

2. Support North Carolina high performance or “greening” efforts

tailored to the new College Hill Phase I building on the campus
of East Carolina University. Encourage charrette participates to
work “hands-on” with facilitators (who have wide expertise with
high performance design) to develop a strategic integrated
approach to the project’s design/ construction approach and priority issues.

3. Identify economically viable and doable High

Performance Priority Action items that the
University could undertake that would
incorporate high performance sustainable design
measures into their College Hill Phase I building
(and also with future university renovations).

4. Establish an initial database of contacts,

champions, and partners for the identified
sustainable design action items. Include (where
possible) approximate costs and schedule
implications. In addition, create a basis for the understanding of the levels of difficulty and
commitment that will be needed required to fulfill each of the proposed action items.

5. Determine immediate next steps, champions, and strategies &

technologies necessary to enable the design team to implement
the proposed High Performance Priority Action Items.

Charrette Process:

After initial presentations by Judy Kincaid from the Triangle J

Council of Government, the University, David Hatton, Scott
Sullivan and Gina Baker from the Design Team, and Gail Lindsey,
participants were each assigned to one of three work groups. In the
morning, the groups analyzed the basic program requirements and
6
discussed all high performance issues that were deemed important to the project. Lunch was
served at Colliseum allowing some time for the participants to see the presentation boards
provided by the Design Team and a scale model of the building within the area on Campus. After
lunch, Gail Lindsey proposed the following basic task list for the remainder of the day:

1. SET PRIORITIES:
• What 5 to 10 items do your group want
to “champion”?
• If you could only accomplish one item,
what would it be?
• How will you make each of them
happen?

2. BE SPECIFIC:
• Identify the “champions”, “partners”
and “leaders” for each of these priority
items
• What are the cost issues: $, $$, or $$$? (Little additional cost to high additional costs)
• What time issues are involved? (Additional research, O&M training, availability, etc.)
• What can be learned from others? (Case studies / mentors, what worked… what

3. SET SUCCESS INDICATORS:

• How will you get feedback and otherwise assess if the project is successful?

The pages that follow present the discussion results of the three work groups; under topic
headings are both high performance strategies and, in boxed format, specific priority actions.

7
 GROUP 1: OBSERVATIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS

PARTICIPANTS:
Alicia Ravetto, AIA (Facilitator) Architect
Patrick Beville, Project Manager, Appalachian
State University
Gay Perez, Assistant Director, University
Housing, NC State University
Chuck Gulledge, (Design Team) Moser Mayer
Phoenix, Assoc., Mechanical Engineer
Jonathan Shambare, ECU Project Architect
Rebecca Bizzell, Director, Resource
Management, Campus Operations, ECU
Tom Pohlman, ECU Environmental Manager
John Gill, ECU Landscape Architect
Cindy Shea, Sustainability Coordinator UNC-Chapel Hill
Joe Boehman, Assistant Director, Resident Education UNC- Chapel Hill

8
ENERGY $$$ (Cost) +++ (Value)

OVERALL RESOURCE: Chuck Gulledge,

Mechanical Engineering, Moser Mayer
Phoenix Associates (Design Team)

GENERAL KEY ISSUES DISCUSSED:

• Internal loads maximum in the
mornings and evening/nights
• Orientation is fixed given the site
constraints (NE)
• Study shading in the courtyard due to
the size of the buildings
• Given:
• utility corridor, entrance to dining, open,
• maintain service routes
• not too high/vertical = low profile
• orientation
• Thermal storage: not a good idea. Ice storage could be possible.
• Operable windows, need screens, code issue for residences
• CO2 sensors
• Maintain positive pressure
• Mechanical equipment on the roof serves architecture of the building
• Remote control of HVAC systems – concern about railroad location and possible
hazardous materials exposure – safe space inside by closing outside air, dampers
• Daylighting benefits during the day to offset peak load: consider lightwells, light
tubes in the corridors, number and size of windows, glare control
• Energy efficient lighting, dual switching, task lighting

1) WINDOWS & DOORS:

• Design windows to reduce
heat gain/losses
• Introduce Daylighting to
reduce lighting load
• Use overhangs, light
shelves, and glazing types
as required by orientation
• Coordinate energy
efficient and aesthetic
issues
• Explore natural ventilation
vs. controlled HVAC
(operable vs. fixed windows)
• Implement more energy efficient lights + task lighting + zoning strategies

9
ENERGY (THERMAL ENVELOPE): $$$ +++

CHAMPION: Burt Hill Kosar Rittelman (Design Team)

RESOURCE: Chuck Gulledge (Design Team)

PRIORITIES:

Avoid piecemeal approach (the thermal envelope is very important!)

Introduce daylighting and daylight controls (i.e. interior light shelves)

Use super efficient windows: double glazing / low-e / argon filled / low-solar heat gain

Increase R-value of walls and roofs

Consider light color roofs / cool roofing initiative (Cool Roof Rating Council)
www.coolroofs.com

Consider an airlock entry

POSSIBLE BARRIERS:

Additional effort but no additional time

SUCCESS INDICATORS:

LCC/LCA to demonstrate success and value

Performance based specs

Aesthetic issues

*CRITICAL ISSUE: CHECK THE ENTIRE ENVELOPE (roof / walls / etc.)

2) PLUG LOADS AND LIGHTING:

• Minimize internal loads
• Use Energy Star
appliances
• Use Energy Efficient
lighting (consider the
use of T5 as a
minimum standard)
• Encourage students to
purchase energy
efficient appliances and
computer

3) HVAC:
• Set a total energy
budget to exceed
ASHRAE 90.1 1999 by
30%
• Review lifecycle costs
for initial vs. long term operating costs
• Determine special HVAC and maintenance issues related to the location of the shafts

10
ENERGY (HVAC EFFICIENCY): $ +++

CHAMPION: Chuck Gulledge (Design Team)

PRIORITIES:

Premium efficiency motors (component)

Lower supply air temperature (system)

Higher delta T on chilled and hot water

Energy reclamation from toilet exhaust

Lower fan energy (increase face area of “stuff” check with Chuck Gulledge)

Heat energy recovery – investigate flush steam recovery vs. solar hot water

Install CO2 sensors

IEQ

CHAMPION: Chuck Gulledge (Design Team)

• VAV (one per suite) dependant on the extent of controls used

• Zoning: individual control vs. unit control
• Humidity control

CHAMPION: Burt Hill Kosar Rittelman (Design Team)

• Acoustic considerations: evaluate the sound transmission through wall construction

• IAQ Management Plan during construction

11
WATER

• Reclamation of water from

condensate lines (water
and energy savings) This
has an impact on chiller
efficienty
• Water use reduction:
install low flow plumbing
fixtures and waterless
urinals (Check
maintenance and access
issues)
• ECU standards include 1.6
gallon/flush toilets, no
automatic devices and
front loading washing
machines
• Stormwater reclamation
and/or retention for
irrigation and for toilets. Coordinate with existing irrigation system tied to
computerized system with potable water.

• Use native and drought tolerant plants (verify ECU standards)

• Use low water needs turf

WATER: $$ +

CHAMPION: John Gill, Landscape Architect, ECU

PRIORITIES:

Reclamation of water from condensate lines

Stormwater reclamation and/or retention

12
 GROUP 2: OBSERVATIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS

PARTICIPANTS:
Charles Brown, (Facilitator) Brown &
Jones Architects
Judy Kincaid, Triangle J Council of
Governments
Scott Sullivan (Architect, Design
Team) Burt Hill Kosar Rittelmann
Assoc.
Marshall Mauney, Architect, State
Construction Office
Steve Lofgren, Assistant Director,
Housing Department, UNC-Chapel Hill
Larry Hicks, Associate Director,
Resident Education, UNC-Chapel Hill
Bill Clutter, ECU
Mark Kimball, Facilities Mechanical Engineer, ECU
Eugene Langford, Construction and Renovation Design Technician, ECU, Steam Plant

13
BIG 5 ISSUES

• STORM WATER
• Collection
• Storage

• WATER EFFICIENCY
• Flow rate testing
• Fixture / Valve performance

• ENERGY USE (20% + savings)

• Orientation
• Lighting
• Controlability of systems

• STUDENT EDUCATION

• IEQ (indoor Environmental Quality)

BARRIERS

• Reduce maintenance
• Budget
• Tight site

NO BRAINERS

• Construction waste management

• Use of local materials (500 miles radius): brick
• Low / NO VOC finishes
• Heat recovery
• Thermal and accoustic comfort

CHALLENGES

• Water storage
• Heat infiltration (windows)
• Site stormwater
• Water fixture performance
• IAQ
• Controlability of systems (operable windows coordination)
• Trash and recycling (site issue)
• Exceed ASHRAE by 20%

EDUCATION

14
EDUCATION:

CHAMPIONS: Jamie Whitehurst (Housing Marketing ECU)

Mark “The Thinker” Kimball (Maintenance ECU)

PRIORITIES:

Educate students, facilities personnel, maintenance staff, housekeeping and contractors on
green

Green becomes marketing tool for housing THE PLACE TO LIVE ON CAMPUS

Penthouse – self sustaining

THE GREEN SUITES

POSSIBLE PARTNERS:

Facilities Department ECU

Student clubs

Burt Hill Kosar Rittelman (Design Team)

BENEFITS:

Student buy-in (could also be an obstacle)

Good PR for ECU

Insures green gets built-maintained and operated

Minimal cost

Data collection

15
STORM WATER

1) OBSTACLES:
• Space for water storage
• Additional piping

2) SOLUTIONS:
• Underground
• Fountain / feature
• Integrate with slope or steps in foundation
• NCDENR grants

3) SYNERGIES:
• Landscaping (drought tolerance)
• Community (features)

WATER EFFICIENCY

• Reduce use
• No leaks

16
 GROUP 3: OBSERVATIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS

PARTICIPANTS:
Gina Baker, Architect (Facilitator)
Design Team Burt Hill Kosar
Rittelmann Assoc.
David Hatton (Design Team) Principal,
Burt Hill Kosar Rittelmann Assoc.
Brad Moore (Architect), NC State
University
Gary Thompson, Assistant Director,
Facilities NCSU
Paul Carlson, Facilities Services
Mechanical Engineer, ECU
Stephen Peay, Facilities Engineer, ECU
Todd Marshall, Project Manager, ECU
Stephen Atkinson, Project Manager,
ECU
Aaron Lucier, Associate Director, ECU

17
ENERGY

ENERGY: PRIORITY #1

CHAMPIONS: Paul Carlson, ECU Campus Living (Housing)

Chuck Gulledge, ME (Design Team)

PRIORITIES:

Energy is # 1priority

Achieve a goal of 10% better than ASHRAE 90.1 1999

POSSIBLE PARTNERS:

G.U.C.

Energy Star

Laundry vendors

POSSIBLE BARRIERS:

Up front cost $$

SYNERGIES: $$$

Reduced maintenance

Education for students, parents, staff

SCHEDULE MILESTONES:

Design scope, CD’s, estimates

Bid process, submittals

Finishes / furnishings by Owner

18
GREEN ROOF

GREEN ROOF: PRIORITY #2

CHAMPION: Paul Carlson, ECU Campus Living (Housing)

POSSIBLE PARTNERS:

UNC Chapel Hill

NC Stave University

UNC Asheville

Cool Roof Initiative

NC DNR, Dept. Water Quality

Charles Brown Architect

POSSIBLE BARRIERS:

Up front cost $$$ - $$ ?

Maintenance – how do you find leaks?

“Internal forces”

SYNERGIES:

“DO THE RIGHT THING” value

Stewardship

Energy impact

Stormwater impact

Recreation – mini-golf

Education, publicity

SCHEDULE MILESTONES:

Pre design research, CD’s

Politics

19
LIGHT POLLUTION

LIGHT POLLUTION: PRIORITY #3

CHAMPIONS: Bill Clutter, ECU Special Projects

PRIORITIES:

Energy is # 1priority

Achieve a goal of 10% better than ASHRAE 90.1 1999

POSSIBLE PARTNERS:

G.U.C.

Campus police

Student government

Board of Trustees

RHA (Security)

POSSIBLE BARRIERS:

$ for this project

$ outside the scope of this project

Scheduling

SYNERGIES:

Campus impact / unity

Operation / maintenance savings

Aesthetics / Education

Stewardship
SCHEDULE/ MILESTONES:

Site design

Subcontract for all of College Hill

NOT GIVING UP ON PRIORITY #1 ENERGY

PRIORITIES:
1. Indoor environmental quality
2. Energy Efficiency
- HVAC
- Lighting
3. Green Roof
4. Recycling in the building, C&D and operations
5. Eliminate light pollution –
- New ECU lighting standards

20
GOAL: REDUCED POTABLE WATER USAGE

STRATEGIES:

Rain water collection

Low-flow fixtures

Recycled water for irrigation

GOAL: DAYLIGHTING

STRATEGIES:

Daylighting of public spaces

Control in living rooms, public spaces

GOAL: GREEN ROOF (vegetated system)

STRATEGIES:

Stormwater managamentn

Life-cycle impact

Contributes to view

Energy benefits

GOAL: ENERGY EFFICIENCY

STRATEGIES:

Lighting
- Energy efficient fluorescents
- Occupancy / daylight sensors

High efficiency motors, fans, pumps - VSD

GOAL: IMPROVED IEQ

STRATEGIES:

Low VOC materials

Ventilation – air filtering

Humidity control & temperature control (Issue: mold and mildew)

GOAL: RAPIDLY RENEWABLE MATERIALS

STRATEGIES:

Bamboo ? Cork ? Issue: maintenance, accoustics, durability

Recycled content materials

21

Carpet

Furniture

GOAL: CONSTRUCTION / DEMOLITION WASTE MANAGEMENT

Incentives

GOAL: RECYCLING

Casework designed to make recycling easy in each suite

GOAL: REDUCED LIFE-CYCLE COSTS

Use local / regional materials

GOAL: REDUCE / ELIMINATE LIGHT POLLUTION

Select proper lighting + landscape – Issue: security

22
ATTACHMENTS:

Charrette Agenda
Green Strategies Preliminary Narrative
Case Study Template
Sustainable Websites

Additional websites and resources:

National Websites:

• EPA Procurement guidelines www.ergweb2.com/cpg

• CSI Division materials www.oikos.org

• Energy Star Program www.energystar.gov

• Environmental Building Newswww.buildinggreen.com

• High Performance Buildings www.highperformancebuildings.gov/case_studies/

• Twenty River Terrace

Battery Park City, NYC www.highperformancebuildings.gov/gbc_2002.html

• Target Finder – Energy Star www.energystar.gov

• LEED Rating Systems www.usgbc.org

• CD/videos www.gggc.state.pa.us

• Video www.savethebay.cbf.org

www.ci.nyc.ny.us/nyclink/html/ddc/home.html

23