Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1.0 INTRODUCTION
There are a few possibilities of problem from this research that have been
identified by us. Firstly, there is less awareness among students about theft cases.
Students usually do not care about theft cases occurring around them unless it is happen
on themselves. Besides, students are careless in protecting their own belonging
especially the valuable item such as laptop, handphone, printer, money and others. There
is a case where students loss their laptops and handphones when they are not in their
room (Ct Zahieyah. In Facebook [Newseed]. Retrieved September 21, 2016, from
https://m.facebook.com/groups/529453753799090?
view=permalink&id=1103850846359375).
1
BWRR 3033 RISK MANAGEMENT
evidence is there is a case of vehicles losses which happened during Friday prayers where
we do not know who the theft is whether student or outsider (Muhammad Shafiq. In
Facebook [Newseed]. Retrieved from November 20, 2015, from
https://m.facebook.com/groups/529453753799090?
view=permalink&id=919376491473479).
Finally, there is no further action taken by the authorities for the theft cases.
Although it is difficult to find who is the theft whether among students or external parties,
an authorities must find an evidence to prevent it happen. They cannot let bygones be
bygones because that is their responsibilities.
3.1 To identify the level sensitivity of students about the risk of losing goods.
3.2 To raise awareness among student about theft cases happen in each dormitory at
UUM.
3.3 To know which risk techniques and analysis is good in managing the risk. Loss
reduction is a risk control technique which can reduce the potential severity of
loss exposure.
2
BWRR 3033 RISK MANAGEMENT
The study clearly shows that university crime is an issue serious and worrying
about the university, students, parents of students, staff and the whole community as a
whole. Universities that have high crime rate will cause the community not to choose the
university, as well as prevent parents from sending their children to institutions that could
be considered unsafe.
But the question of security sometimes raises questions when data and criminal
statistics occur in universities in Malaysia is closed data or secret. This can be seen when
the crime statistics are going into the university is not easy to access and can not be
accessed via internet search. News of crime in the university is more published regularly
through newspaper reports and university bulletin boards.
3
BWRR 3033 RISK MANAGEMENT
Based on several security cases, it is clear that the security atmosphere at the
university needs better control. In dealing with security cases at the university, the
security forces are always blamed. However, there are some other factors that may cause
this to happen, examples of weaknesses in regulatory systems such as the lack of security
personnel, student negligence, and building infrastructure conditions or conditions.
There are some questions that arise from the statements that have been explained.
Did the university security department take that step effective in ensuring the safety of
students? With reports and information regarding non-open crime, does the student feel
that they are safe with the existing security controls within the university. Via of the
question, a major question what is the perception of the student against their safety at the
university.
In this study, primary and secondary data methodology is used to support data
accuracy. Primary data were taken from a small survey, using questionnaire instruments
to meet the objective. The questionnaire is divided into two sections, the first part is a
question about socio-demography and the second part is a question about perceptions and
suggestions to improve the safety and security level of each dormitory. Researcher uses
this method because it is more accurate and easy to get information from the student.
Secondary data is review from scholar journal related to our studies.
4
BWRR 3033 RISK MANAGEMENT
From the data collected with the help of questionnaire, 35 were females and 5
were males. Most of the students are from dormitory Sime Darby (10) , Bank Rakyat (7),
Mas (6), Muamalat (4), SME Bank (2), BSN (2), Grantt (2), TM (2), Petronas (2),
Proton (2) and TNB (1). There were six international students and the rest were local
students.
Yes 11 (27.5 %)
No 29 (72.5)
The result shows above that there are 11 respondants that have lost their
belongings. The other 29 respondants out of 40 have never lost their belongings.
This shows the aware that property destruction or theft can be exposed in any situation
Yes 34 (87.2%)
No 4 (10.3%)
Maybe 1 (2.6%)
5.2 Aware that Property Destruction or Theft Can Be Happened In Any Situation
The student agrees they alert aware that property destruction or theft can be
exposed in any situation. From 40 respondents, 34 students say yes, they alert the
property can be exposed in any situation, 4 respondents say not, they not aware the
5
BWRR 3033 RISK MANAGEMENT
property can be exposed in any situation and the remaining say maybe. From the survey
they aware that property destruction or theft can be exposed in any situation.
Careless 13 (61.9%)
5.3 The Reasons that Property Destruction or Theft Can Be Happened In Any Situation
The table above shows that the most students say careless is the higher reason
61.9%, money problem is 38.1 %, stranger around dormitory 38.1%, poor security
33.33%, physiology problem 14.3% and going out a late night same with the perversely.
Students must be careful before anything happen.
6
BWRR 3033 RISK MANAGEMENT
Money 11 (64.7%)
Gadget 9 (52.9%)
Vehicles 4 (23.5%)
Begs 1 (5.9%)
Shoes 1 (5.9%)
The table above shows that the most items that student have lost is money with 11
respondants. Nine of the students also have lost their gadget such as smartphone and
laptop. Four of the students have lost their vehicle. One students for their beg and shoes,
and one student never lost anything.
The result shows that the most of incident happened when the students are not in
their room or dormitory. 11 students stated that the incident happened when they were
outside of their room such as classes and meeting while seven respondants agree that the
theft happened during semester break. One respondant respond that the theft can happen
during exam week. We can assume that, the theft always happened whenever the students
are not in their room so it is easy for the thieves to steal the belongings.
7
BWRR 3033 RISK MANAGEMENT
Yes 21 (52.5%)
No 19 (47.5%)
The students respond that the safety and security of the dormitory is not well
supervised. The result as shown above that 47.5% students which is nearly half of the
respondants stated no, as the safety and security of the dormitory is not well supervised
while the other 52.5% students stated that the dormitory is well supervised. We may
assume that, some of the reasons the theft happens because of the dormitory is not well
supervised.
Yes 21 (52.5%)
No 19 (47.5%)
5.7 Satisfied with The Action by The Authorities Against the Theft
The respondants that satisfied with the action by the authorities against the theft
are 21 students and 19 students does not satisfied with the authorities’ action. This can be
concluded that the authorities must improves their action a little more against the theft of
goods and belongings.
8
BWRR 3033 RISK MANAGEMENT
Yes 34 (85%)
No 6 (15%)
Most of the students with 34 respondants agree that UUM should held a seminar
on safety and security about the theft that might be happened on unexpected situation.
Besides, some of the students with six respondants does not agree that UUM must held a
seminar on safety and security. We can conclude that, UUM should held a seminar on
safety and security issues to give awareness to some of the students who still does not
aware of unexpected situation that might be happened.
9
BWRR 3033 RISK MANAGEMENT
Lastly, from our survey we obtained some recommendations from the students
about how to improve the dormitories safeness. The installment of CCTV is the most
highly recommended with 24 responses and the least recommended is not keeping
excessive cash in the room with 10 responses. 14 responses on recommendation to raise
more awareness towards theft and stranger around dormitories while 19 responses to take
further action from authorized parties (such as UUM Safety Department, Head of
Dormitories). 15 responses for both re-enforce environmental security system (patrol
around dormitories and university) and penalties and fine to theft as recommendations to
improve the dormitories safeness.
10
BWRR 3033 RISK MANAGEMENT
11
BWRR 3033 RISK MANAGEMENT
8.0 REFERENCES
12
BWRR 3033 RISK MANAGEMENT
9.0 APPENDICES
13
BWRR 3033 RISK MANAGEMENT
14