You are on page 1of 4

Talanta, Vol. 42, No. I, pp.

105-108, 1995
Copyright ~3 1994 Elsevier Science Ltd
Pergamon 0039-9140(94)00224-X Printed in Great Britain. All rights reserved
0039-9140/95 $9.50 + 0.00

SPECTROPHOTOMETRIC DETERMINATION OF
DICLOFENAC SODIUM WITH METHYLENE BLUE

JULIO C. BOTELLO a n d GUADALUPE PI~REZ-CABALLERO*


Facultad de Estudios Superiores Cuautitl/m U.N.A.M., Secci6n de Quimica Analitica, Campo Uno. Av.
Primero de Mayo, s/N Cuautitlfin Izcalli, C.P. 54740, Estado de M6xico, M6xico

(Received 4 May 1994. Revised2 August 1994. Accepted4 August 1994)

Summary--A sensitive spectrophotometric method was established for the determination of Diclofenac
sodium (DS) with Methylene Blue (MB) as analytical reagent. It was found that DS reacts with an excess
of MB in the pH range 9.2-9.4, to form a chloroform-extractable blue ion-association complex. Good
agreement with Beer's law was found in the range of DS concentrations of 0.8~.4/ag/ml with a detection
limit of 0.37 pg/ml. The method was applied for the determination of DS in various tableted forms with
a good precision.

2-(2,6-dichloroanilino)Phenyl acetate (Diclofe- Research pH-meter, calibrated with buffer


nac sodium) (Fig. la) is a nonsteroidal anti- solution (pH 10 + 0.05).
inflammatory agent with potent activity and
outstanding tolerability in the treatment Reagents
of rheumatic diseases.L2 It has been measured DS (standard drug), 99.46% purity, Voltaren
by a variety of analytical techniques such Retard and Flenaken tablets containing 100 mg
as ultraviolet 3 and visible spectrophoto- DS, and Voltaren tablets containing 50 mg DS
metry, 4"5 gas 6-8 and liquid chromatography 9-12 were analyzed. All other chemicals used were
and nuclear magnetic resonance spectros- analytical-reagent grade. Deionized water was
copy. 13 used to prepare all solutions and in all
Spectrophotometric methods provide sensi- experiments.
tive, precise and accurate measurements of suit-
able analytes and they offer practical and Solutions
economical advantages over other methods. Di- A freshly prepared aqueous solution of the
clofenac sodium (DS) has been analyzed by pure drug (40 mcg/ml; 1.2573 x 10-4M) was
spectrophotometric methods using complexa- used as the standard solution for analytical
tion with copper acetate 4 or Methylene Violet 5 purposes. A 0.032% w/v (!.04 x 10-3M)
followed by extraction, the latter being a more aqueous Methylene Blue solution was prepared
sensitive method than the former. The aim of for these experiments. A m m o n i u m / a m m o n i a
the present work was to establish an improved buffer solutions covering the pH range from 8 to
extraction and spectrophotometric method with 11 were made by mixing equal volumes of 1.0M
greater sensitivity for the determination of DS ammonia and 1.0M a m m o n i u m chloride sol-
using Methylene Blue (MB) (Fig. lb) in different utions and adjusting the pH with sodium
tableted dosage. hydroxide or hydrochloric acid.

Procedure
EXPERIMENTAL
Aliquots of DS solution were transferred into
Apparatus
a series of 125 ml separating funnels; then 5 ml
A Beckman DU-65 single beam spectropho- of MB solution and 1 ml of buffer (pH 9.4) was
tometer with 10 m m glass cells was used for the added. The total volume of the aqueous phase
absorbance measurements. The p H measure- was adjusted to 10 ml with water. Chloroform
ments were made with a Corning Model 12 (10 ml) was added and the contents shook for
exactly 5 min, the separated chloroform layer
*Author to whom the correspondence should be addressed. was collected in a 25 ml volumetric flask. A new

105
106 J. C. BOTELLO and G. Pi~REZ-CABALLERO

<•CHzCOONa
to 50 ml with deionized water and treated as
described above for the standard drug solution.
NH C l ~

C RESULTS AND DISCUSSION


(a) Absorption spectra
Diclofenac sodium reacted with MB in
aqueous solution in alkaline medium to form a
N< blue ion-association complex which was ex-
tracted into chloroform. Figure 2 shows the
absorption spectra of this complex and the
Cl- reagent blank. This complex has an absorption
(CH3)aN N(CH3)=
+ maximum at 653 nm against reagent blank,
hence this wavelength was used for all sub-
sequent measurements. Under the same exper-
(b) imental conditions the reagent blank gave a
Fig. 1. Structure of (a) Diclofenac sodium and (b) Methyl- maximum absorption at 642 nm.
ene Blue.
Optimum conditions for complex formation
10 ml volume o f chloroform volume was added In order to establish the optimum p H range,
and shook for 5 min, this second extract was DS was mixed with M B in aqueous solution
combined with the first and this solution diluted from p H 8 to 11, and the ion-associated com-
to the m a r k with chloroform. The absorbance of plex absorbance measured. Figure 3 shows that
the organic phase was measured against a re- the absorbance increases and reaches a maxi-
agent blank. The reagent blank was prepared m u m and constant value at 9.2-9.5 p H range.
exactly like the procedure described above, but At p H values above 9.5 the absorbance decrease
in absence of DS. was probably due to the formation of a new
ion-associated complex between MB and hy-
Procedure of the assay of tab&ted dosage droxyl anion in alkaline medium since exper-
An amount of tablet powder equivalent to 80 imentally, the reagent blank absorbance
mg of anti-inflammatory agent was weighed increases. Hence, a pH of 9.4 was used in all the
accurately and dissolved in water by magnetic subsequent experimental work. The shape of the
stirring. Filtration through a filter paper spectra and m a x i m u m position did not vary
(Whatman 40) was performed to remove insolu- with pH, so it was concluded that only one
ble matter remaining. The solution was diluted complex was formed at this p H range.

0.9

A
B zq

S 0.6
O
R e i

B i i

A
N
C e" I

E 0.3 II

..... o°,"
° ° . . ° - °
0.0 I I
400 500 600 700
WAVELENGTH(nm)
Fig. 2. The absorption spectra of the blank reagent (---), and DS-MB ( ) complex formed in the
aqueous 0.05M NH+/NH3 buffer containing 5 x 10-4M MB and extracted with chloroform.
Determination of Diclofenac sodium with Methylene Blue 107
0.7

A
B
$ 0.6
O
R
B
A
N
C 0.5
E

I I I I I
8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0
pH
Fig. 3. Variation in absorbance of the DS-MB complex, fonned in aqueous 0.05M NH+/NH3 buffer
containing 5 x 10-4M MB at different pH values (aborbances were obtained at 2653nm)"

The extent of the extraction of the ion-associ- produced a constant absorbance. An ionic
ated complex was found to be affected by the strength of 0.025M was produced by the buffer.
MB concentration. To establish the optimum
MB concentration the solution absorbances Linearity
were plotted as a function of MB concentration
(Fig. 4). The absorbance of the system increased A calibration curve was obtained under opti-
in the range of 1-3.5 x 10-4M MB and the m u m conditions (pH 9.4; 5 x 10-4M MB; ionic
absorbance was practically constant in a range strength 0.025M), absorbance responses were
of 4-6 x 10-4M MB, hence a concentration of linear in relation to the calculated concentration
5.0 x 10-4M MB was used as the optimum of DS over the range 0.8-6.4 mcg/mi
concentration. The excess of MB in this system (2.5 x 10-6-2.5 x 10-SM). The equation for
was 25-200 times the concentration of DS. one representative calibration curve is:
Two extractions were necessary to achieve a A = ( - 0 . 0 1 9 1 + 0.0423) + (0.1789 + 0.0105)C,
quantitative recovery of the complex. Ab-
sorbances of the separated extracts were stable where A and C correspond to absorbance
for at least 1 hr. A shaking time of 5 min and DS calculated concentration (pg/mi),

1.3.

X I .-.'4
1.2'
A
B
S
1.1'
o
R
B
1.0,
A
N
C
E 0.9

0.8 ¸

0.7 I ! I I I i
0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 S.0 6.0
[MB| (M X 10 -4)
Fig. 4. Variation in absorbance of the DS-MB complex, formed in aqueous 0.05M NH~/NH~ buffer
containing different concentrations of MB (absorbances were obtained at 2653,m).
108 J.C. BOTELLOand G. I~REZ-CABALLERO

Table 1. Comparison of sensitivity parameters of the differ- o f the m a t r i x effect over the absorbances
ent spectrophotometric methods for the determination of measurements.
Diclofenac sodium
Sandell Detection CONCLUSIONS
Analytical sensitivity limit
reagent (rag/cm 2) (mcg /ml) T h e p r o p o s e d m e t h o d is economical, simple,
Copper acetate 0.01026 1.00 rapid, precise a n d sensitive. The use o f M B as
Methylene Violet -- 72.00 a n a l y t i c a l reagent p r o v i d e s a fairly higher sensi-
Methylene Blue 0.006 0.37
tivity c o m p a r e d with o t h e r similar reagents such
as M e t h y l e n e Violet.
Table 2. Determination of Diclofenac sodium in different
tableted dosage Acknowledgements--We thank Dr Ignacio Gonzfilez for his
collaboration in this project. J. C. Botello acknowledges the
Labeled amount Amount found scholarship from CONACYT.
Drug (mg ) (rag)
Flenaken 100.00 101.45 + 0.42
Voltaren Retard 100.00 101.35 _+0.13 REFERENCES
Voltaren 50.00 49.97 _+0.15
1. R. Sallman, Am. J. Med., 1986, 80, 29.
Each drug was analyzed eight times. 2. W. Scholer, I. Boettcher and A. Schweizer, Am. J. Med.,
1986, 80, 34.
respectively. The correlation coefficient 3. K. Arrawal, V. P. Upayay and S. K. Menon, Indian
J. Pharm. Sci., 1988, 50, 58.
(r) = 0.998 (n = 8), i n d i c a t i n g excellent linear- 4. A. N. Other. A. N. Other, Agatanovic-Kustrin, L. J.
ity. T h e m o l a r a b s o r p t i v i t y coefficient was Zivanovic, D. Radulivic and M. Vasiljevic, Analyst,
5.7 x 10aM - l cm -~, a n d the Sandell sensitivity 1991, 166, 753.
0.006 m g / c m 2 with a detection limit o f 0.37 5. S. P. Sastry, A. S. R. Prasad Tirpeneni and M. V.
m c g / m l (1.2 x 1 0 - 6 M ) . T a b l e 1 shows t h a t the Suryanarayama, Analyst, 1989, 114, 513.
6. A. Schweizer, J. V. Willis, D. B. Jack and M. J. Kendall,
T a b l e 1 shows t h a t the m e t h o d r e p o r t e d here J. Chromatogr., 1980, 195, 421.
has higher sensitivity t h a n o t h e r similar 7. W. Schneider and P. H. Degen, J. Chromatogr., 1981,
m e t h o d s , in which c o p p e r acetate 4 a n d M e t h y l - 217, 263.
ene Violet 5 are e m p l o y e d as a n a l y t i c a l reagents. 8. B. Henning, A. Steup and R. Benecke, Pharmazie, 1987,
13, 1307.
Application 9. T. Sane, R. S. Samant and V. G. Nayak, Drug Dev. Ind.
Pharm., 1987, 13, 1307.
T h e a p p l i c a b i l i t y o f the m e t h o d to the assay 10. D. Grandjean, J. C. Beolor, M. T. Quincon and
o f simple d o s a g e f o r m s was e x a m i n e d by a n a l y z - E. Savel, J. Pharm. Sci., 1989, 78, 247.
ing F l e n a k e n , V o l t a r e n a n d V o l t a r e n R e t a r d 11. H. Chan, K. H. Vyas and K. Wnuck, Anal. Lett., 1982,
tablets. T a b l e 2 shows the quantities o b t a i n e d 15, 1649.
12. A. N. Other. Godbilon, S. Gauron and J. P. Metayer,
by p r o p o s e d m e t h o d a n d labeled a m o u n t . T h e J. Chromatogr., 1985, 338, 151.
relative s t a n d a r d d e v i a t i o n s are lower t h a n 1% 13. A. Abdel Fanah, J. P. El-Khateeb, S. A. Abdel Raxeg
i n d i c a t i n g g o o d precision a n d the i n d e p e n d e n c e and M. S. Tawakkol, Spectrosc. Lett., 1988, 21, 533.

You might also like