KRITERIA PENSKORAN WRITING ANALYICAL EXPOSITION

NO ASPEK DESKRIPSI SKOR

Relevant to the topic. Support main idea convincingly with specific, 5
appropriate example/reason/evidence
1 Content Relevant to the topic. Support main idea adequately with specific, 4
appropriate example/reason/evidence
Mostly relevant to the topic. Support main idea but few points are 3
too general/ abstract/vague.
Generally address the topic . Lack use of specific, appropriate 2
example/reason/evidence.
Main idea is not clear. No use of specific, appropriate 1
example/reason/evidence.

Focuses on the main idea with well-organized and well-elaborated 5

text.
2 Organisation Focuses on the main idea and well-organized but not well- 4
elaborated.
Focuses on the main idea but not well-organized and not well- 3
elaborated.
Not focus on the main idea, sometimes has more than one main idea, 2
unwell-organized and unwell-elaborated.
The main idea is not clear, lack of elaboration 1

Effective word order, no jumbled words, no mistakes in: tense, word 5

order, articles, pronoun, and preposition.
3 Sentence Standard word order, no jumbled words, few mistakes in: tense, 4
Formatting and word order, articles, pronoun, and preposition.
Usage Generally, standard word order, some jumbled words, some 3
mistakes in: tense, word order, articles, pronoun, and preposition.
Some standard word order, some jumbled words, many mistakes in: 2
tense, word order, articles, pronoun, and preposition.
Frequent standard word order, some jumbled words, many mistakes 1
in: tense, word order, articles, pronoun, and preposition.

Well-chosen vocabulary, sentence variety and information. 5

Vocabulary is precise and the information is purposeful. 4
4 Vocabulary Vocabulary is less precise and the information is less purposeful. 3
and Style Use only basic vocabulary and not purposefully selected. Its tone is 2
flat or not consistent.
Unwell-chosen vocabulary, sentence variety and information.  The 1
meaning also vague.

Effective use of capitalization, punctuation, spelling and formatting. 5

Few (if any) noticeable error in capitalization, punctuation, spelling 4
and formatting.
Generally, almost use effective capitalization, punctuation, spelling 3
5 Mechanic and formatting. If there is any error, it does not detract from
meaning.
Several errors in spelling and punctuation which detract from 2
meaning.
Many misspell in simple words. 1
 KRITERIA PENSKORAN SPEAKING

NO ASPEK DESKRIPSI SKOR

Relevant to the topic. Support main idea convincingly with specific, 5
appropriate example/reason/evidence
1 Content Relevant to the topic. Support main idea adequately with specific, 4
appropriate example/reason/evidence
Mostly relevant to the topic. Support main idea but few points are 3
too general/ abstract/vague.
Generally address the topic . Lack use of specific, appropriate 2
example/reason/evidence.
Main idea is not clear. No use of specific, appropriate 1
example/reason/evidence.

Focuses on the main idea with well-organized and well-elaborated 5

text.
2 Organisation Focuses on the main idea and well-organized but not well- 4
elaborated.
Focuses on the main idea but not well-organized and not well- 3
elaborated.
Not focus on the main idea, sometimes has more than one main 2
idea, unwell-organized and unwell-elaborated.
The main idea is not clear, lack of elaboration 1

Well-chosen vocabulary, sentence variety and information. 5

Vocabulary is precise and the information is purposeful. 4
4 Vocabulary Vocabulary is less precise and the information is less purposeful. 3
and Style Use only basic vocabulary and not purposefully selected. Its tone is 2
flat or not consistent.
Unwell-chosen vocabulary, sentence variety and information.  The 1
meaning also vague.

Native like pronunciation and fluency 5

Few (if any) noticeable error in pronunciation 4
Pronunciation Generally, almost use correct pronunciation. If there is any error, it 3
does not detract from meaning.
5 Several errors in pronunciation which detract from meaning. 2
Many mispronounce in simple words. 1