You are on page 1of 9

ON THE STRATEGYOF DEVELOPMENT

OF
DETELOPEDCOUMRIES:
The Red--GreenAlliance and- its Problens
L-- T^L^- t'-^14.'rm
u.y u vlralf var uwr6

Go a ' l s - P ro c e sses and Ind-i cators of


T )o rro lo n -n e n t - TT\ Irni vprsi tw P ro i ect
In s ti tu t u n i versi tai re d' S tudes du
d 6 rra I n n n c m e n t - e eneva .
-1-

Introd"uction

B y I' d e v e l o p e d c o u rrtri e s rr in thi s context I an essenti al l y


thinJ<ing rich, of
capitalist cou:rtries - in other word-s of the
(1 )
oECl countries'.-'They are today in a crisis of their or^n making.
T he c ri s i s h a s tw o ro o ts : one i n the i nternati onal system, one
in the i n tra -n a ti o n a l s y s te m - one gl obal , one domesti c. The
globa l c ri s i s s te m s fro m the cfearcut d,eci si on by Thi rd- w orl d
c ou: r t ri e s no longer to s e r ve as a peri phery or external sector
of the economies of the oECD cor.rntries, but to internart-ze their
own c c o n o m i e s , possibly e ven turni ng the cards the other w ay,
(p\
ex t er n a l -i z i n g th e O E C I c o u ntri e' S 1 A nd the domesti c cri si s has i ts
root in the web of phenornena that can be referred to as t'niateri-al

n rra rd o rr al vLr \vr ' !Lr


r mf"'
anf a2\- - uvufvylr
nOn-srmiuatefja]- U ndor - l or r ol nnm an* tt
' - in Othef W OfdS

as m a l d e v e l o p me n tl ' N e e d l e ss to say these tw o phenomena are re-


l- at ed to e a c h o th e r, a n d i n .tl ei r w ake fol l -ow such s;nnptoms as
(L)
hum an a n d s o c i a l p a th o l o g i e df ' ci vi l -i zati on d-i seases (cardi o-vas*
c ular di seases, tu tL o rs , m e ntal d.i seascs) o cri me and vi ol -ence in
gener a l , a l c o h o l i s m , a p a th y , sui ci d.e, top hearry soci al structu.l es,

m ilit ari z a ti o n of th e s o c i eti es and so on. The l i st coul d be macl e


m uc h l o n g e r, th i s is only to suggest the topi c to be d_i scassed.
Jt s h o u l tl also b e e mp h a s i z e d that nany of the domesti c probl ens
t hat only te n y e a rs a g o w oul d be attenLpted sol ved through economi c
means today are no longer solyable that r^ay ( ttrey were not ten
y ear s a g o e i th e r, fo r th a t matter): the money i s no l onger avai fabfe
due t o th e d e te ri o ra ti o n of the ' posi tj " on of these countri es in
(5 )
t he u o rtc L
" " o n o r" .
-2-

As a re s u l t of th i s , in N orthern E urope, and to some extent

in N o rth Ame ri c a , th e two maj or pol i ti cal fcrces ri ght now seem

t o b e " th e b fu e w i n d -" a nd " the g:reen w ave" . W hether in pow er

or not social d-emocracy has been the d-ominant trend for the
las t fi fty y e a rs or so. Tts rrredrr or sol -uti onr(soft)
" rose"
s t a te c o n tro l over c a p i t al i st forces, has l ed to a consi d-erabfe
er n a n s ' i o n o f th e n rrh l -e soetnr- to a h' l ' rnti nr" of some cl ass
c o n tra d i c ti o n s , to a w el fare sLate s1' stem. A t the same ti me

._--" ,,)
nreqn-a- in cn n i.l- fo r m a tiOn and snn.A l nnmnnqi l -i On have l -ed- to

a s te a d y d c c fi n e
._"::1"
in th e sj -ze of the tradi ti onal w orki ng cfass.\o

Re a c ti o n s against th a t soci af constructi on are now mounti ng :


P-^- +U fLf C^ .]- 1 r o n - i + .; +he
I M it -Ljr u - L + UM VMlllUg ^r,^ ^f
Vf state
U AU C as
aO econnrn.i
r\ (/ l ,r !!l r c ar"ent - the

we a. r ninr " { - or m or e r ie"ht a.nd frer-.do.ns tn di sn-rse cver economic


"-'.),*
ma rnq fnn fha l?nr i r r :l:ptt - i ndi r r i dr r el . fr nm l - ho l - annoc r r qr r e- l lrr
!v ! lvL v!,
t t

F ,,*+ 1U I.^ - +U Un fh a 'l +h^ on


^-^'r'r
Dlll@ f !. IU ISI UIIS .fu ^f+ UllV ^ri sh
laurr to
uv :v ! f. al rFl
: L^e-
--! in the same

dir e c ti o n s .ri th m o re s ta te and w orker control , from the new green


n|\n, Vr- ls a as cano12-
<v r i s r a r l er
u r r ui l q q s t' i nr ie nf
vr i uoc hnn.T
r !r u r v\r o L ,! 2 cv rw^r
r l ghal
u l r vl- hor
rIU^^+^,.1
vu g u
i n
!f
cD U* c@u g t * a
t

^^-i
V@I / !
+U A- I' r ^-
UI
1U V^ ^ rU1l I t.- Of
vMlglIUgLlDlll Clie ntel i S m c-d
cl r u .^ncrrrnori
!Vf1 - U l r g !ID Il It sm. and S O On.

A b th e s a m e ti m e m o s t fa bor parti es are probabl y spl i t more or


'I j s h l u, 'w!ff6
' :-- r-' r' -^ -^1o tha.t
rueo rs s rirn
r a rr!6!r
a t a- uf qY l r v !L u- r a u rsrrfl
J r r l y 4rnathi
ur fr D ses w i th the
nyvr
a l -!i*jnc'u!v@r
l r ithlr
!!6r ut :nd q
aar in m oon nnd, r al * rf:ni
av - i nnq
ur v l r r n- - {i a" 'l o- l - ' r av
s PaL ul uuaJ r

a m^ntr i tc .,ar r fl" r f4a.' a fh^ tr ..+..r o nf f.hac


4lllv l! 6 f VJ IlIuDt UllY f U U U IL va urruuu a s i :nl - . n:r f.i uru- aq mJr \t
.'*
svUuUlI. 6 fu i r u }/u !

ea s i l y b e v e ry sinilar to the present of the great l -i Leraf ' oar-


f i oc lh cl n r a n a r lp fl th e m in ma.nv C OU ntIi eS : a C OnS C i C nC e Of

s o c' i e tru.yr.l-L4w J l v l v tbvftr c^ ..+ h jn E \.rn^^ hi o eommrrni st nafti C S


v x l ulr4th e r afe de-

veloping ro s e , g re e n a n d even bl ue pol es - so the cri si s is as


^ ^ - - - ^ +D - ru 4 r
urJ
:;^r D^ ^ lr r .i nrr m r-)nl -]_chrnm^+-i
vr L L JL .@ u-a u
*--+-i ^- f
i '^rn snmoJ-.h.i
vr r r r r b nrn
a u yo r urg- tf uv !r ,r !!
(t\
-v+

more colourful .\ ' '


- 7)-

The c onc er n here. however. is not with the future of


r-L ^ -.- * a- . i-Uj I Y D^- L, .+ .w.J ; +1 ^ fhe l i E r hut lfVIn r
I dUU4I !A! - ^
A- ^.
D q v,l f- 1. " , UUU ull hrrman and
ll social

dev elop me n t. lt is ta k e n a s axi omati c that bl ue pol es in the soci o/

ec onomi c /p o l -i ti c a L fo rrn a ti o n based. on pri vate corporati ons, wilt by

and lar g e b e s ta L u s q u o o ri ented, and so w i fl most of the protagoni sts

of t he ro s e s o fu ti o n , s ta te control over pri vate corporati ons. l ,i hat


t hey will try to do will- b e to sofve the probl ems as they appcar, one
h rr n no - : nd t hor r : r o: . lr ead\ . r r,toul discowcrinrr th:t tharr 2-ral-,innincr nrrt

of e en r om i c- s oc iaf and hUm a n C a n i t a . 'l in f -y;nr" to do sn- Ircnco.


I L\ llvv One
'

woul-d look towards the green l^/ave as an important caryrer, in its


f ioht fo r a .' l -te rn -* t'U I-'V U WA J D
-' l i fe-
VI l .!- r a.nd ^ro i s' l od t-.n
rgd uU iU,ho
llY nrrosti
U4Ur U gn;
- - - __- -,--4 t

to wha b e x te n t is th i s c o mpati bl e w i th, in contradi cti on w i th, or in

out r igh t c o n fl i c t w i th th e cl ass struggl e of ;rri ch the ]abour parti es

hav e b e e n th e o rg a n i z e rs ? Put i n si mpl e tern;: w hal is the rel ati on


/,- ^- L - i fe^) \
bet v een WOL (W a y Of struggl e and cfass strregl e? f an pubti ng
t ho nr n h l e m' i n fh n e o i a n ma h..+ afS O i -n S Ome Other terms: W hat are

t he po s s i b i l i ti e s ol a re d /g reen al l -i ance? The tw o w ays of putti ng it

ar e no t q u i te i d e n ti c a l if one d-efi nes therrred- pol e" of the pol i ti cal


s pec t r u ,.rL a s a n e m p h a .s i s o n the state as acbor and the " green pcl erras
:n omn h. aqiq nn t he loc al leV e l aS an actor. One ma.v bc a.r:tirre in the

mrrchin the state as an economic


"tu.ffielieving
a a l .o r and rri Ve' 1.sz - and one m 2r ' be i nfer ps tod in c h:nc naq i nL
!r ur :r r
w s.y nf
^o

life without necessarily linking them to action at the locaf 1evel.


I shall be playing on both sets of concepts, however, trying to ex-
plore the rel-ations between them.

?. (ll a. s s su t urrru Ar Fpnc l r u e vv Y^-


I D q^-
D "^
IV'! V!
r nr ^ *U J- 4*'-
D <<
-l-e: an overview

No doubt we are deal i ng here w i th tw o di fferent


n t r r a n n n an a arran fle 6 1 1 .c"h t,l. cw rol a.te tO the S amg S nci otr. - rn: Lrrro
'v v v l ]l 'ew 4!v '

r:en itelu@rrr i s t u sovurs


u4yf oc iet i uf ^^
gD /-r +ufrv46lr
r ^^'- - t -uch
rlr of the same could be said also
\4r

about mature state capitalist societies, "socialist" societies).


-A T -

' f his is s e e n v e -ry c l e a rl y if oi -e engages i n strabery ^-^


ar@LJ
"1
--^iDt5, ^ ^ -1-i.^
dJ,tlIlI8 -

t he s ix c ru c i a l q u e s ti o n s w hat?rw hy?rw ho?r1" ow ?rw hen? and where? of


the tr^rn tr r n o q of sn r . i: I q tr r r ocl
u vr 46 6 !e . o

\ -L/ '_L'ne wna'D

fn c l- a s s s tru g g l e th e w h a t to do, the goal i tsel f is rel _ati vel y cl ear:


a s oc ia l i s t s o c i e ty w i th c l ass di fferences abol i shed- or at l east very
heav ily re d u c e d , p a rti c u l a rl y w i th regard to condi ti ons of prod-ucti on
and fevel- of living - thereby liber:ating everybody. trirom a wol stmggle
point of view th i s is not s e en i n terms of cl asses but rather in terms
of ev ery b o d y living a mo re o r l ess w rong 1i fe, so the struggl e takes
t he f orm o f a fi g h t against mal devel opment, i e. agai nst patterns of
under and overconsumption whether for material and,/or non-material
needs , fo r e v e ry b o d -y . Thus, both of them have as a goal a more harmo-
nious so c i e ty : th e c fa s s s trug6' l e shoul d l ead to a soci ety w i thout
c l- as s es , th e WOL s tru g g l e to a sr:i ety w i tnout mal d,evel opnent, a soci ety
where nobody is forced into patternsr of u:rd.er and overconsurnption of
one t hin g or th e o th e r. N o d-oubt cl ass struggl e asks more questi ons
about h o w g o o d s a n d s e rv i c e s are produced, w ho d-eci des, w hat i s the
dis t r ibuti o n of what is p ro d ,uced and the costs and benefi ts of the
pr oduc t i o n p ro c e s s ; W C L s tru g gl e asl .-s more w hat is prod-uced, w hat
r q nn-qrrmod r*,r,,*
h r tf, [in
k i nfl d Off
o llife
i fe does
d thi s f" ra to, and so on. For
t hat reason th e re is n o d i ffi c ul ty gi vi ng cari cature presentati ons
of eac h o f th e m : th e class struggl e peopl e can be seen as peopl e w ho
do not dispute what is produced- as long as the share in the consumption
and t he c o n d i ti o n s o f p ro d u c ti on is about rl ght; W OL struggl e peopl e
do not care so much about how it is produced, who ornneand d,ecide about
t he m ea n s o f p ro d u c ti o n a s l o ng as w hat is produced and w hat i s con-
sumed are about right from the point oi view of a more desirabl e way
of lif e. B o th of th e m , h o w e ver, w oul d rej ect - and ri ghtl y so - such
c ar ic at u re p re s e n ta ti o n : th e cl ass struggl e peopl e w oul d say that
t he s Lr u g g l e against c a p i ta l i sm al so . pens for the possi bi l i ty of new
dec is ion s w h e re p ro d u c ti o n is concerned, more for use and fess for
ex c hang e e tc .; a n d th e WOL struggl e pcopl e w oul d si mi l arl y say that
to s et ri g h t what is p ro d .u c ed and how i t is di stri buted a new soci al
tr

f or m alio n is n e e d e d - w h e re n o t onl y w orkers but al -so, i ndeed, con-


s um er s d e c i d e over th e p ro d u cti on.

/^\
l '2 1 I'h A r ^Ihar
\ - / -:-:____::i:l_

F r om t h e class s tru g g l e point of vi ew : because there is a maj or


onom
Lr r v r lr v r r - c .a n i t:l i s m (i n s ta te ca.ni tafi st soci eti es thi s w oufd take the

f or n of th e s ta te c a p i ta l i s t) w hi ch perpetuates thi s pattern of

c las s division becaase it d i sposes, by vi rtue of i ts monopol y over


^n -I J*^ ' r4'9' ^ r ' i^ nU f I- h^ n-od rced hw the w orkers a.nd will
lllgO lI D UL LUU Vai, ^1r^T
vvsl UJls ouJ
-"rnl rrs
Ir l u r yr v!- tWg u UJ

always try to rnanoer\Te in such a way that the surplus increases (by
'l jh^F^- - ir - r--r
rlkp oni
u syrrrb T ts wapnes
wat) uu n' .
r vw l^"'
uJ lffv!YaDIlf6 nr
y rnl ''nf
v uqw uri rvlli *uJ
-- o-LVi
a) )u 9r l l r
\
. r ur q
N fOm
f the
t t

WOL struggle point of view: because there is a naj or enemy, technocracy,


,,; +h h ^ +1^ +- r ; ^+ !^ pnm anr an* o r f4r - 1 .
wI UlI UUU J r ^^-
U @ ! f.i U4frOUt J-U
+.@UV - .^iu
@fr liffntel u'lvffttr vl l u uir f"
u enJ ,Si a u Vl IN Vl fg l l U D . r r t!- l ^i i l ]

olcn n a r n a *.r e fo th e Se co n d itio n s of ma.l dew el onment aS thefe is an

LV r;t >r rov u"1 j *^


^^^..--+i
4DDUr r I ' Uf ^'^
Uff ^!
Vf J e SS wh i e h w
r i rir l . _ al w a.ri s
OTWo JD remai n
r sr r @r fr -^h+?o^
!vr l urault --1-.,
LUrJ uu tfue

hum an ,t* " " " = r" -l o l tn i c h re a son technocracy has to be d-estroyed- or

built d o w n to scale a n d a " s o ci ety w i th smal l er uni ts and hi gh l evel

of loc af s e ff-re fi a n c e h a s to emerge. B oth of them w i l l energeti cal l y


ro i a n J- flea ar zinnt' .nn v ul gt/l gul J ul 4i - t]
nr ncar *c+ iO n fefeffed tO ; tl ^a r - l aSS S:- l or " l e

n eo n'l e will s a. w +U lL^+ . i- . r ^^+U-IWJf-


^ - --iOn g e- * fa n .-i i r l i s r n n e - 6-Ja^ID- - r - ^et
wlf
jJ s v llr s I ooJ l@ U lll UYD L41i Uq D
- ,- w

fn r cn a i otr r . end *ha \nIOT, ql- nr c *oo_-


sla nannl o r ^r nr r - l d q:r r r l ^:f in daqf.r oyang

fonhnnnrrnl/ fnr tho noqqih-ilifrr nf: jlac^_l^co cnnja*


^na -_ - -rd,bs-f,e5s :j uu_Le uy.
^nanq

B ot h of th e m w i l f s e e w h a t th ey suggest not onl y as a suffi ci ent


nnn,-l-i*inn
vL v LL) hrrf *r s a nec es s ar y condition.
-*.

/
( -\
r/ rne wno

R
Dvn fh v r L *rmaq af q*nr csl o r ^ii I I dr :w fhoi r qtr nnnr t fr nm noonl o hi t lrrr tha
uJ ls r vi r vru66tv y!vj ,r !

. as r r oc f n f s o c i o trr i n q.rd /or


fo r:rts t- =-J-- consci ous of t! pl
t,,prr n I nnnc
-- --"-elvrng
of s oc ia f ills. Thus, th e c l a ss struggl e w oul d d-raw upon w orki ng cl -ass

elem ent s , w a g e -e a rn e rs in g e neral and on rrenl i ghLened" peopl e from the

boar geoi s i e who will s h a re wi th the w orki ng cfass peopl e in maki ng


q- Hr r lo ' l' ifo:r i:' il: h]
th a h n rrrc an' iq nf o to m :nr r m nr o nann'l o r r l ti m :tpl r r

Ir ^ r s I.IAT -l .t1nr tn
fn
u9 a
u rro
vu Lr-,hadr
.yuuuJr . r ni
affu uf vr v! ^+
r u- .,- -l s
L466r C rw^rr r- ri I d- aw
qr av , uy v r I nAOnl O rw^rffv
hO h:tr
i i @ vg
t Ir s w y r s

Las t ed- a n d te s te d th e b o u rg e oi s w ay of l i fe and found it w anti ng:


-b-

l '..^-o -\ m
l l l f'Uiddl
UIC a elf a r p r qc
U nonnl
yevyru,
a nr r * 'i vL va lnr
a l LrJl 2T l r r luho
LLs r r nr r no el nd
rlu fha
ulrs adr
u r a.:*
u u v@U Vq ,o.l
\ Uy t r Er / lar Jv@1 6

t oget her w i th ' re n f i g h te n e d ' r p eop-Le from the w orki ng cfass w i l l i ng to

share with the bourgeois elements in the search for alternative \,{ays
''n.'ay oI
w I'if^
l al e. m}.ic
l rrLS l-^in-F
o-
^e L _Lale , orrrL garrrs ].n
lj]-^
a w a y I_
-"---
f766
-...
fha lrnrrroan-i^
--* * o - -* s ^f mina

ner s nor : ti v o l ' rrr a .' ls o a .s k i n s rr w ho are on the other si d-ert : most of the

bour geoi s i e in th e case of th e cl -ass struggl e, anxi ous not to l ose


t heir p ri v i l e g e s in a levelling out of materi al stand-ard of l i vi ng
in gene ra l . ln th e c a s e o f W OJ,struggl e much of thc w orki ng cl ass
r ^r hor , v o u fd h a te to s e e th e i r d -ream deni grated, even destroyed before
th a 'ir L r or q ( z nd *u1^ar a
ur Ls s Jsrpaq ir r q- l- .u
J4D
ro q
v ther r 2r o 2hnr
au v4 u r t tn l :r r fhai
u r fsfrr h:nr
r fu ffu o:l nn
vr l !i Iu
\a r i u Jr u r E

is no doubt that this is precisely the reason why the bourgeoisie is


starting d-estroying its own style of life - more or fess a correct
norr:ent.i o n ) _ T ' Jr e ln n e T . cl a sses w OA ]-d ranarl h.r n'l s cc
be mOf e fh1'oo

struggle than by WOL struggle, they have the resources fo escape from
m:nrr of th o e r r ilc of m :- l d e we lonnant :nr.hru if nnf l --nm rl - :nrl f.herr

m ight also p e rc e i v e th e W OL srruggl e, in amusement, as an effort to

c opy s o me o f th e i r o w n ma n n ers, gi rnmi cks and passti me exerci sesrb' rt


at a c o n s i d e ra b l y lower l -e v e l- of expcnd-i ture.

(4) rhq lrow

B ot h of th e m w i fl , of c o u rs e , carry out thei r i deol ogi cal j obs in ord-er


t o br ing about higher levef of consci ousness formati on, in themsel ves
as welf as in th e p o p u l a ti o n at, l argc Lhe w hofe popul ace as possi ble
' w i th
pr os ely t e s . Bo th of th e n w i l -l mobi l :-ze, argani ze. B ut w hen i t comes
*^ !ufL^ +u . y.'I J s-^ made us.e of and the method ,.f f.i 6r" ht i n
uv rs ^f
vr -o n fror v rnf ta utia o vnr v r r
vuraf luaucq r .v u !!u rlrs
vr r vu vr rf rru

gener af th e re a re i m p o rta n t di fl erences. fn the cl -ass struggl e as i t


has developed in the OECD countries the demonstrations and the strike
are standard, but there is an underlying assumption of nationwid_e
i LVY^ 'l
sni idari
DVI f , UAI f , UJ . tw- Ta l h
lg c - ^ i- ^
64IJID - L ^ "- r
DfIVUAU l or
fvr :.1
aLL, - not
rrr ! fnr
_U4 a
a lya:rt
Lv nf
vL f.ho
Urru ui
w ork'i ncn

- b e tte r c o n d i ti o n s for w orkers in that I' actory, or w orkers


"t""" "*
wit h t hi s kind of s p e c i a l i ty . It shoufd" be for the w orki ng cfass as
a e - n l- h o r wi se f he c:.n i f:l i stS
us Wouf
w oul u d be
De abl -e_e *a
d,u,l rl .vA
'.rhn'l 'rr ^ha
-,,_ o__up
nmoincf u +h^
LJLe from^-]-;r- +ha r^rarl<inc nleqq *L-^-.ml^ cancro*
aSa.Ill:j O ullef
^+h^- , -tI'a8lllen tllLg I--- ,,- -----,o t JII OUBJI :jelJil-I'il, ue

deaf s , and so on. in th e W C L strrrggl e an i nportant nethod is of course

af s o t he d e m o n s tra ti o n , but t hen there is the posi ti ve nega.ti on, the


t-

c onc r ete u to p i a , th e fu tu re now , to gai n expe-' i ence and show con-

cretely what the goal is. 1,1here class struggle would be waged- with
a v iew to n a ti o n a l w o rk i n g cl ass controf and nati onal sofuti ons,
^^+u 6v- ^;--
f rv
f
116 -1 -^ -i ' rnJnvrtr-r
orrvau 9arrJ
i-
!l L
nna'
vtl g
trranC
L h befOre al l C an j Oi n, bhe W OL
mm hl j
vS f v!rrrrn
u b bC"l
f ve irwvur
or tl v d l^a
Je 3ii,lilur J- r l8- m pl 'ec r - - - J s el tr nn l :ho f oanf al am ant v,,r ar }i
-- oni - - ._* ng

f or peo p l e rs fo c a l c o n tro f at the mi cro and meso 1evel s - at the


lev el of th e s ma l f c o n m u rre s and the muni ci pal i ti es. The cl ass struggl e
neonl e wn r r l d o n l r r r e a .l i r .r . a n:11 Of thei f tOtal rrarm
u!9al!'U'J
hrrl l r-- ;O dO

that on a nation\^rid.e basis: the WOi strtggle people v/ould Tealize


l,he t o l al d r e :.m - fh a - - ,.r n r r l' l nrcnl ,-i se nr:.x.i s n6ur. and nOt Wai t fOr.

nat ional s o l u ti o n s . In c o n v e nti onaf pol i ti cal sci ence terms: the
^ 'ira
w -cc
oD cfr
D ur-rrm m lov
u66r nennle wnr r ld
wv4!u hp
us hi
r .-s l t an dnm r i n J r r r Ju:'l nrf ^rv w nnr
ur qn^na.
uuv }J s ,
Ir YvI/ts -*

+r^^ r.rrl r nannl- ,..^,,' li lvY


- ,a hi r " h
uI r Y vvv! ^L-v ..-
D ! q 6 6- flr g
IJgwIJrg wwu!u -16r- on
\/r L su ueone
v!u bU
L t fO W On dof1ai n.

r +U .i^ _^ + ,._ ' t' t_ r_. y ;_ _ - li^ ;+ ;_ --t^_r r^raI i tS t v S


I !D 6U UU4r IITTIJMT U lll wlla U <J ]' va -a.4:a the C l 1.S .: :t-tt_ql e
^ o ''

nonnl o ur r nl: l- .o dn - i l: or r or r n^r hor o nnqq i hl h.. _hi ++i


u u !r !o nc f i nql - : r fh
'r _! _ ..e

l ra -. n o n fonc n{ - nnnl- r nl l:hr


w r r ! nr rs
v h:
Go r r nr r al r r ti nnq?1r e^r r n T [r o \r l l T :r
t -

people w a n t to d .o i t w h e re it is pructi cabl e, at a pface vrhere there

is s pac e , w h e re e rp e ri n e n ts can be carri ed out, even to some extent


qhnur i Lr \.f) - - r c fnl
vvrY ao@
-rl
-p to fluvu
t DflvwlllS -- UllU Wd,y . ,tl l d L the
UllU nl pc
ur oac > > LrocU
- l56r u e ynennl
uul r r u e pna.i n
64- r r in

space they then l-ose in time: there is the assurption that one has to
r,rr.it
f r * Lv fn r
lv L tuhe
rru r ip' L+
r!€:,lrV
+V L'Ii- ^
L L W,
+u frl g^^ -!l liur e "Tn - e-- for
fu r the contradictions

t o bec o me s u ffi c i e n tl y n ta tu r e. A nd the' opposi te can be sai d about


the W O T , sl,n
v ! u:o
6 6 ! .""]
v e nL /eu vn}/ fnv lc: lr h a t v tho.r
w !t'J I'rsn 'n qneno thew e"ai n in +.i me:

t he t ir n e fo r a c ti -o n is n o w , N o d.oubt, in al l of thi s one can hear the

s hadow s o f th e " d e b a te " b e tw een TY arx, -ropresenti ng the cfass struggl e


-^i6L
}jufllU
^f
Uf -VaeW
- j^ .- -'^rl
Altu tr
J n r lr icT .-
vulfsl t
T.enT,asan-,i
lsPasJu-r.frr6 n.c" Lhe WOT, S tr;oorc -r noi nt,
lrJrriu
of
U V i eW

boih r e fe rri n r" t.o L h e ms e fv e s as soci al i sLs - the former ai mi ns


*.-_'_-_'o for
_

total controf of structural- and resource polrer in society, the latter


-h n n i * ho
r lv jr f n
r q
16 i.o : chi or r e r pqr r l *.s thr nr r c nl ' tho nnu,nr rf ov :m n'l o-

It makes little sense to discuss a strategy without afso


discussing the obvious counter-strategles - not onl-y who is on the
q.ido L^.' ,,1.^6 r ^n
n *h o r l.r r r f
-* - n o w rw nen a n cl ..1'^r
w ne- a thor r r ^r nr i - l d tr,,y
.. +^
ro m r i _nrarn
mal n* ni h +l
rne.i
o

qta*rrq norhrnq arran rrqino fha faroo nnhncino *ham


^rr^
Y4v, }/crrrayu sv!rr qurrLtj urrL rurvE v},lruDrf16 uffsuL aD a \\aJ ot

strengthening their own situation (lut for this they have to be a

little clever).

Thus, if th e class struggl e takes a revofuti onary form


the obvious counter-strateg:,r l,rould- bc L,o keep a low horizon and sirnply
i n -i n *h o r or r nlr r *' i nner .r nqr fr r hnni na fnr ar r an l z nnr - r i no fhc
utrfaL c f* uer
at
cj ---- - ,t.tuw r r r g,

t he r ev o l u ti o n th e re will s ti l l be a cl ass soci ety al though perhaps

of a s li g h tl y d -i ffe re n t kind and then tryi ng to di g out a ni che in


flra na'.r llal acc?l cnni aJ-rr
g
UfIC ffgW t U!4DDIYDD
-ccl JVUf UJ .

You might also like