Professional Documents
Culture Documents
i .ia
I :. ;,.- l:
-.5: rll. -.:-
'': ':;:11-*'i&J::-:.
-..; '..* i:d
,.le
{...' :!-*_;,,i;:; ,
''
-**n&r.:
*
$
'",".:{:.!1!4.@'
:ffi,a*+*Fri:
-!tj-'+&*{i:i*ra '
,:::iffi.'.1iiiqF::1
3@5#Fli,-d.cs:'
Published by Australia: Back numbers are obtainab:
Orbis Publishing Ltd from WAR |\,4ACHlNE Back Numbers, Gc-
@ Aerospace Publishing Ltd 1983 don & Gotch (Aus) Ltd, 114 William Stree:
PO Box 767G, Melbourne, Vic 3001 .
.'iorid War II proved that tanks had a major role to play on the battlefield, land and Sweden also undertook the design and later productron c:
in the USA some of the projects stiii under way at the end of the war tanks in this period, the Swedish S{ank being one of the most rtnu.su6-
=d
,rere continued, though many others were canceiled. A considerable vehicles of its type.
:.::rount of work was done on automotive components such as engines The USSR continued to design, develop and place in production tadcs
::id transmissions, well as on the main armament. This e{Iort was put to
as after World War II. On a one-for-one basis these were generally hfenor
;.:od use at the outbreak of the Korean War, and within a short time the to their Westem counterparts, but they were cheap and easy to malu-
.SAwas able to place in production a whole range of armoured vehicles factwe, maintain and operate, all factors which have led to their expori
urcluding the M41 light tank, M47/M4B medium tank and Ml03 heavy on a wide scale to most parts of the world.
as well as numerous self-propelled gmns, APCs and other special- During the I950s the first antitank gnrided missiles appeared. These
=nk,
zed vehicles, Many of these vehicles were ordered even before pro- were very basic compared to the systems in use today, but they did
:3types were completed, and the result was that many of these had later provide the basis on which more effective systems could be desigmed
:c be rebuilt, a very expensive and time-consuming process. Since then and built, and their introduction in both vehicle- and man-portable
ihe USA has taken care to test thoroughly its armoured vehicles before versions has changed the face of the battlefield, once again compelling
olacing them in production. tank designers to place greater emphasis on armour protection,
In the UK a complete family of vehicies ranging from tanks to self- It must also be remembered that many of the vehicles in service
propelled guns was conceived, but many of these did not reach the today, and in some cases still in production, can trace their development
production stage and the most successfirl British tank of this period, the back to the mid-1950s, or in some cases even earlier.
Cenh:rion, can trace its development back to World War II. Some of the vehicles described have now disappeared from semce
France also started an AFV development programme in the immedi- as their chassis could not be adopted to carry new weapon systerns,
ate post-war period with the EBR armoured car and AMX-13 light tank, while others (for example the M48 and Centurion tanks) have been
both unusual designs. The latter has been exported all over the world constantly updated to enable them to remain viable weapon systems for
and remains in production to this day, as do many of its specialized the foreseeable fuhrre.
variants such as troop carriers and self-propelled gn:ns. One of the features of Middle East wadare has been the frequency with which
In the mid-1950s armoured deveiopment again started in Japan and captured weaponsftayebeen turned against their former owners. Heri we
West Germany, with production vehicles following in the 1960s. Switzer- see anEgwtian Centurion, captured from Israel in 1973.
ilff+ens MainBattle Tank
=
\Alhen the Korean War broke out in
1950, the USA had no medrum tanks in
production. As an intdrim measure the
hrret of the T43 medium tank then
under development was put onto the
chassis of the M46Al tank and this en-
tered production as the M47, well over
8,000 beiaq built. The M47 has long
been phased out of US Army service
but remains in service with many
countries including Greece, Italy, The M47 was one of the earlier *.;
Spain, Pakistan and Portugal, to name members of a family of armoured l
but a few. Design wolk on a new vehicles stretching from the M26 s
medium tank, also armedwith a 90-mm Pershing tank through to the M60 of
gnm, started in the early I950s under today. The M47 saw action in Korea I
the designation T48, and this was before being replaced by the much-
ordered into production even before improvedM4S Patton.
the first prototypes had been com-
pleted. The first production vehicles the type Patton. Wiih such a shod de- by a Teledyne Continental AVDS- stocks of M4Bs to M4BA5 standard Tr:
were completed at the Delaware'Iank velopment period, which was justified 1790-2A diesel whLich increased the West German company Wegrnar -.==
Plant, operated by the Chrysler Cor- by the lntemational situation at that operational ralge of the tank to some converted some 650 M4BA2 tanks :-'r:
poration, inJuly 1952, when the widow ttme, there were many problems with 2BB miles (463 kn). the M48A2GA2 version for the !'r -s:
of General George Patton christened the early M4Bs, including poor reiiabil- Production of the M4B series con- German army. These have the Bn:r
ity and a very short operating range of tinued untrl 1959, by which time over 105-mm lr7A3 gnm, new arrrnun;:-:
M48A2 ot th.e US Army with only 70 miles (i 13 km). The M4B was 1I,700 had been built. The M4B was racks, new commander's cupola- pa:-
commander's and loader's hatch in lollowed by the M48Al, M4842 and succeeded in production by the M60 sive night-vision equipment, We3-
the open position. By late 1983 the US frnally M48A3" The last had many mod- series, which itself is a further de- mann smoke dischargers and rnoi-
Anny still had over 2,000 of these rficatrons as a result of problems mth velopment of the M48. The M4B is still ifications to the fire-control systern.
vehicles on s/rength. the earlier vehicies, and was powered used by many countries around the The automotive components of tf.
world includinq Greece, Iran, Israel, M4B were also used in the M88 AF",-
Jordan, South Korea, l,ebanon, Moroc- and the M53 and M55 self-propelia:
co, Norway, Pakistaa, Portr:gal, Soma- artillery weapons. Variants of the M4!
lia, Spain, Taiwan, fhailand, T\.rnisia, include the M6?, M67Al and M67.t?
Ttrkey, the USA and West Germany, flamethrower tanks (none of which a::
The M48, M4BA1, M48A2 and at present in ftont-line service) and t=
M48A3 are all armed wrth a 90-mm M48 AVLB which is widelyused in t-
gmn, wrth a 7.62-mm (0.3-rn) machire- US Army and has a scissors bridge
gmn mounted co-axially with the main launched over the front of the vehicl:
armament and a 0.S-in (12.7-mm) The chassis is also being used for tb=
machine-gnm mounted in the comman- new M247 Sgt York Division Au D€-
der's cupola. To extend the type's fenee System (DIVADS), the first pr:-
operational hfe, the M48AS was de- ductlon examples of which shou-:
veloped in the mid-I970s. This is come off the production line in la:=
essentially any one of the earlier mod- 1983. This has a new turret armed wr:
els rebuilt and fltted with a 105-mm twin 4O-mm Bofors guns and a compr=-
M6B gun (as fitted to the M60 series), a hensive fire-control system which w-
7.62-mm (0.3-in) M60D machine-gnrn be able to engage low flying arcre=
on the turret rool a new powerpack and helicopters. Over 600 of these a::
and many other detailed modifica- expected to be procured by the LS
tions. From 1975 Anniston Army Depot Army to provrde each division wr:
converted weil over 2,000 of the older one battahon of DIVADS vehicles.
M48 series MBTs to the M4BA5 con- The M48 series has seen comba:
figuration, and apart from two batta- with the United States and Vietnamese
lions in Korea these are all deployed in armies in South Vietnam, with the
the USA, The Uruted States has also Pakistani army agairst India, and wrr
supplied many countries with kits to the Israeii army agalnst Jordan, Egryp:
enable them to convert their ensting and Syria. It has now proved to be a
reliable tank, and when fitted with the
105-mm L7A3 or MOB qnrn can counter
most tanks likely to be encountered or
the battlefield today, especially wher
firing the new types of APFSDS-T
ammunitron developed by the Unitec
States, Israel and the United Kingdorn
Specification
Crew: 4
Weight: 47.17 tonnes
Engriie: continendlAvDs- 1790-2A t2-
cylinder diesel developing 750 bhp
(s60 k\ D
Dimensions: length (with gnm forward)
8,686 m (28 ft 6 in); lenqth (hull) 6.882 m
(22ft7in), width 3,63Im (Iift 11in);
heisht3.124m(10ft3in)
Performance: maximum road speed
49.Zkrn/h (30 mph); maximum range
463 m (288 miles)); fording 1,219 m (4 ft
0in); gnadient 60%; vertical obstacle
0,915m (3ft 0in); trench 2,59m (8ft
6 in)
242
.USA
E M50 Ontos tank destroyer Armowed Vehicles of the lg50s and lg60s
-- -:e
early 1950s the US Marine Corps been retired from service l,vlth the US
:;-=::d a requirement for a highly Marine Corps without a direct re-
-':;:le ta:rk destroyer, and in October placement, although ground- and
-I- authorization was given for the vehicle-mounted TOW ATGWs carry
:r*rng of no less than five prototype out a similar function,
;=:---les, a.ll of which had various num- The vehicle was armed with six
:e= of recoilless rifles as their main M40A1C recoilless rrfles mounted on a
::=arnent, These were built and cotrrmon mount at the rear of the hull.
:=red ald u: February 1953 approval These had a traverse of 40' left and
T-:s elven for the procurement of 24 right with an elevation of *20' and a
=--,cels
of the T165 which was armed depression of -10o, elevation and
:n-:: six 106-mm recoilless rrlles. Trials traverse all being manual, The top four
r-:: the first of these vehicles showed recoilless rrlles were fitted with a 12.7-
--:a: some work was required with the mm (0.5-in) MBC spottlng rifle: the
:::-:ntiag, fire-control system and sus- weapons were fLst lined up with the
;e-ron. The remaining vehicles were opticai sight and the spotting rifle was
:dt to a slightly modified design and then fired, a hit on the target berng
i:signated the Tl65E2. Following indicated by a pulf of smoke, whereup-
::"ls mth the latter vehicles, and more on the gunner krew that the recoilless
*':difications, the vehicle was finally rifle was correctly aliEmed vnth the
:::epted for service with the US target. One or more of the recoilless
l.bine Corps and in 1955 was standar- rifles could be fired, maximum efec-
:-:ed as the Rille, Multiple, 106-mm tive rangre being about 1100m (I,200
Self-Propelled, M50 or, as it was nor- yards) although maximum ranqe was
-:lly called, the Ontos (Greek for The over 7000m (7,655 yards). The
li-ng), In August 1955 Allis Chalmers ammunition was of the fixed type and hull rear, The engine was coupi*d to a MSA Onbs tank destoyer as used by
r,r:s awarded a productron contract for included HEAT (High Exploslve Anti- General Motors Corporatron (Atlt-sol the US ir'larine Corps. Note the I 2.7-
l:l vehicles, whlch were all com- Tank) and HEP-T (High Explosive Divrsion) XT-90-2 crcis dri"e transrnu- mm spotting MGs ahove the top four
::=ted by November 1957, At a later Plastic-TYacer), the latter type being sion that transmitted power to the lA6-mm recoilless rifles. Once these
j=:e it was decrded to replace the ori- loown as HESH in British service, Tot- drive sprockets at the front of the hull. had beenfired thecrewhad toleave
;-::ai General Motors petrol engme als of 18 rounds of 106-mm and B0 The chassis was also used :r a num= the vehicle to reload them.
z:.i a Chrysler petrol engrne develop- rounds of spottmg ammunition were ber of expenmental vehicies Lrut none
::q 180 hp ( 134 kW) and subsequently, carried, In additron an MI9I9A4 7.62- of these, including several arrnor;yedl (6ft 1tle in)
'- jue 1963, the orignnai manufacturer mm (0.3-in) machine-En:n was fitted to infantry carders, entered proeluctic;i Powerplant: one General Motors Cor-
xas awarded a contract to reburld 294 the top of the mount for local protec- oI serl'lce, poration lUodei 302 petrol engnne de-
1.50 vehicies to the new configwation tion. veloprns laS hp (108 kW)
iccwn as M50Al; at the same ttme a The driver was seated at the front of Specification Performance: maximum road speeci
-'-imber of other minor improvements the hull on the left, with the engrne to Crew: 3 48 km/h (30 mph); maximum road
rere made to the vehicle. The M50 hrs right and the very cramped crew Weight: 8.64 tonnes ranrge 240 km (150 miles); qadient 6f
a-as used in South Vietnam and in the compartment at the rear; entry to the Dimensions: lenqth 3.82 m (12 ft 63/s in); per cent; vertical obstacle 0.76m
lcminican Republic, but it has now iatter was effected via two doors in the wtdth 2.60 m (B ft 6/a in); heiqht 2" 13 m (30 in); trench 1.42 m (4 ft 8 in)
::a:-*::jer a::d to the rear of the gun; Another drawback was the com- rear, BI-mm and 107-mm self- i :: : r:
5.841 m (19 ft 2 in); length (hull)
.:.].: .TPC-T, HE-T. HEAT, HEAT.T, plete lack of armour protection for the propelled mortar carriers, a 106-mm (14ft lltls in); width 2.577r- : l
-=;-T $,? TP-T, HVAP-TandHVTP- crew, apart from the very small shield, M40 recoilless anti-tank gnrn carrier, a 57zin); height 2,067m (6ft 9* -
I ::.::is cculd be fired. The main The driver was seated to the left of the missile launcher and an antiaircraft Powerplant: one Contine:-::. :
i:a.l;i:ack of the M56, which had much grun with the gmnner to the rear; the vehicle fitted with four 12,7-mm (0.5-in) cylinder petroi engine deve-::-::
:e:el irepower than the M4i light iatter was provided with a sight with a MZHB machine Qnrrr; none of these en- 200 bhp (149 kw)
-ra}r i's 76-mm gun, was that the magnrflcatron of x4, I or x8. tered production or service, Performance: maximum road
:=::-<
::"ssrs was too light and when the 90- The chassis of the M56 was also used 45
-e*:
km/h (28 mph); maximun-- !:.:
:-l: lun was fired the vehicle often as the basis for a number of other vehi- Specification range 225 lcn (140 miles); grrads-: ii
:-:--;eci several feet and the target was cles including an armoured personnel Crew: 4 per cent; vertical obstacle 0 -:- n
:csgr:ed by dust from the muzzle carrier wrth a much higher superstruc- Weight: 7,03 tonnes (30 in); trench 1.524 m (5 ft O rnl
ture with the troop compartment at the Dimensions: length (including gun)
66e-
Ml03 heavytank
lAe $andard American heavy tank at M I 03 heavy tank showing external
-:e end of World War II was the M26 I 2.7 -mm M 2 an ti- aircraft machine-
?ershing, which saw action rn the clos-
:-; months of the European campaign;
-:: jre post-war period this was reclas-
as a medium tank and agarn saw
=.ed
Jombat in Korea. Development of
:eary tanks continued in the USA, a wn on the commander's cupola. The
-:rnber of prototypes being built in- M 103 was designed provide long-
to
:ludrng
-,Vrth
the T29, T30, T34 and T32, range support to the 90-mm armed
the advent of the Cold War de- M48 tanks and to counter the Soviet
sEm work commenced on three new IS-3 tankswith their 122-mm gruns.
:ad<s, the T41 light tank which was They were deployed to Europe but
s:andardized as the M4l, the T42 were soon phased out of sewice. I n
:redrum wLuch resulted in the M47, many respects the M 103 was
a:rd the Ttli|. Trials with prototypes of essenfi'ally a sca led-up M48 tank.
re last revealed nurnerous deficien-
cres especially in the areas of turret constant reliability problems, and the British Conqueror heavy tank de- ber-tyred road wheels (with the c:r=
and gmn control equrpment, and tn the M103s were phased out of sewice wrth veloped at the same time), sprocket at the rear and idler ai ::-:
srghtiag system, none of which met the the US fumy in the I960s, A number In many respects the M103 was vir- front) and six track-return rollers.
specifications of the user. Trials mth were supplied to the US Marrne Corps, tually a scaled-up M4B, with the driver Main armament comprlsed a -i--
modiied vehicles designated T43El and in the 1960s I53 vehrcles were at the front, turet and fighting com- mm rifled gmn with an elevation of * - :'
showed that over 100 additional mod- fltted wlth a type of new engdne, which partrnent in the centre, and the engdne and a depression of -8o, tu:::'
:ications were required, but the vehi- increased operational range foom 130 and tlansmrssron at the rear, The com- traverse being 360', Ammumtion r-=-:
cle was evenhrally standardized as the to 480 ]cn (80 to 300 miles); these were mander's cupola, which was provrded of the separateJoading type, and a :: --
Tad<, Combat, I\rlI Tracked, 120-mm, desigmated Ml03A2. They have since with an extemally mounted 12.7-mm al of 38 rounds (38 projectiles and :=
Mi03. A total of 200 vehicles was buiit been phased out ofservice wtth the US (0,5-in) M2HB machine-gun for anti- same number of charges) was carr-::
by Chrysler at the Detroit Tank Plant Marine Corps, and none was supplied atrcraff defence, was in the centre of The following types of ammuru:::
belween 1952 and 1954 for deploy- to any foreign countries under the the tufiet at the rear, while the gnrnner could be fired: AP-T, HE, HE-T, !';
ment with the ?th Army in Europe, MAP. The role of the Ml03 was to pro- and one of the loaders were seated WP-T and TP-T. A 7,62-mm (0,3'-
where it was found that the welqht and vide direct assault and lonq-range forward on the right with the second machine-gnrn was mounted co-aEl
snall range of action made the type anti-tank support to the M47 and later loader on the left. The torsion-bar sus- with the main armament, and 5,2:'-
clifficult to employ. There were also the M4B (a similar role to that of the persion consrsted of seven dual rub- rounds of ammunition were carried :::
this; stowage was provided for l,C,-,.
rounds of 12,?-mm (0,S-in) ammunitic:-
Standard equipment included cre'r
compartment heaters, deep-fordr-;
egurpment, infantry telephone and :
fire extinguishing system.
To support the Ml03 the MSl
armoured recovery vehicle was bu-:
on the same chassis. This was fltte:
with a rear spade, winches and :
heavy-duty crane for changnng majc:
components in the field.
-.!,.i::i.j:ri::i:i:i ..';
Specification
Crew: 5
-air:i':ii,):t]:i:,
Weight 56.7 tonnes
Dimensions: length (gun forwards,
11,32m (37tt lt/zin); length (hull.
6.98 m (22 ft 11 in); width 3.76 m (12 i
4 in); heiqht 2.88 m (9 ft 5% in)
Powerplant: one Continental AV- 1790-
58 or 7C V-12 petrol engine develop-
ing 810 hp (604 kW)
Performance: maximum road speed
34 km/h (21 mph); maximum road
range 130 icn (80 miles); giradient 6C
per cent; vertical obstacle 0.91 m
(36 in); trench 2.29 m (7 ft 6 in)
244
IbnkWarfore inVietncm
, le.nam saw armour used in a variety of , w$8tF
:t..:.
:ries. buf ra rely in the classic tank- t
reisl.rs- falk action, Tanks proved well I
{ :e to clear i ungle Paths, destroY VC *+ ,t
-' -:-;
World War Ii Vretnam was occupied by
-:-=
-apanese, and on their surrender the
.:::-:i moved back in again, so beginning a
:. :: :ampaign which flna1ly resulted in the
::r .:-.-e U'attte at Dien Bien Phu, where the
::::-:h were defeated in 1954. In Indo-China
made conslderable and often suc-
-= lrench
-=.s:c..] use of armour, especially half{racks,
l"'*l Chaffee light tanks and various armoured
- :-: :ibious vehicies. Following the withdraw-
. ::-irench units from Vietnam the country was
were widely used to escort these convoys and T-54 tank of the Viet Cong with inlantrymen
:-:-: nto hvo, North Vietnam and South Viet- aboard, in front of Independence Palace in S aigon
:,:i:- were then fairly easy targets for Viet Cong in May 1975. There were many engageme4ts
l.rrth Vietnam reiied on the USSR and Chlna equipped with the Soviet-supplied RPG-7 anti- between S outh Vietnamese M48 tanks and N or th
.:: -:s sufply of AFVs, receiving substanti-a-l tank crrenade-launcher, This weapon launches Vietnamese Soviet- supplied T'54/ T - 5 5 s and
. ::::ers-of Tlpe 59 T-54 T-55 and T-34/85 a PG-i anti-tank rocket fltted with a HEAT war- Clrrnese-suppfi ed TYpe 5 9 s.
-=:-<s TVpe 62-and Type 63 light tanks; the head capable of penetratrng some 320 mm
I
: lo amphibious light tank (well suited for use (i2.6 in) ilf armour, For this reason many M48s
It is often forgotten that the Austraiian ar::--;
:.',':etnam); BTR-40, BTR-50, BTR-60, BTR-152 were flited with sandbags and spare track hnks
to their hulls and turrets in the pious hope of played a major rote in Vietnam, and one squai-
-.1 Tlpe 531 armoured personnel carriers,
-seif-propelled
.'=cG artiliery weapons such detonating the HEAT warhead away from the ronof the lst Armoured Regiment, Royal A'*'-
.. re SU-100 anO SU-8S; and the ZSU-23-4 and main armour of the tank, Additional machine- tralian Armoured Corps, was deployed ic -:-:
-'l-57-2 seif-propelled anti-aircraft gn:ns, with guns were often mounted on the turret roof to country to support Australian infantry, Ths.;-.
-:-: iatter staying mainly north of the border. irovide close protection as the cupola- was equipped wlth the British Centurion :a::<
S:uth Vretnam was initially equipped with mounted 0.5-in (12,7-mm) machine-giun was armed with the 20-pounder gn:n and suppor.e j
: .: vehtcles such as M3 half-tracks' M24 Chal found to be unwieidy when operating in a by the Centurion Mk 2 ARV (armoured recc-''-
::: light tanks and M8 and M20 Greyhound dense jungle environment. ery vehicle) and Centurion Mk 5 bridgelale:
-::noured cars, but with increasing American It was not until i969 that the Americans first From all accounts the Centurlon gave a gc:d
used their M48A3s in the tank-killing role: in account of itself, although it was never usei ::
-:-',-olvement more modern equipment was engage enemy tanks. Its superior armour pr: -
s:pplied in large numbers, including the M41 that year they successfully destroyed tryg_Pt
76 amphibious iight tanks with 90-mm HEAT tection over the Amerlcan M48 enabled li ::
-.ghi and M48 medium tanks; the Ml13 s-eries
rounds. In addition to the basic M48A3 the US withstand far better the effect of RPG-7 HEi-l
-:!C and its countless variants; the 155-mm projectiles,
],i109 l75-mm Mi0? and 203-mm M110 self- fumy used the M48 scissors brrdgeiayer in
:lopelled artillery weapons; and the 20-mm Vietnam, while the US Marrne Corps also used Towards the end of the war North Vie:-
:.:lO: anO 40-mrir M42- self-propelled antr- the M67 series flamethrower tank which is also namese armoured units were operating -:.
gnm systems, based on the M48 tank. The M67 is fltted with a South Vietnam in some numbers, and in 1972 a
=:craft flame gnrn which projects fire to a range of South Vietnamese tank regiment equppq?
Americantroops arrive between 100 and 200 yards (90 and I80 m), and with the M48A3 successfully engaged PT-i:
In July 1965 the first American armoured carries sufficient fuel for some 60 seconds of and T-54 tanks, destroying several of these
:nits iveie deployed to South Vietnamwith the operation, It was normal to flre short bursts without losing any tanks to enemy tank fire.
arrival of a US Marine Corps tank battaiion rather than one contlnuous burst. To operate
equ:pped with the 90-mm gn:nned M48A3' and with the M48 tank the M88 recovery vehicle
n'the following year the first US Army tank was also deployed to Vietnam in some num- US Army M48 tanks inVietnam. Firing canisler
battali.on arrived wlth similar vehicles' Initially bers, and this pioved invaluabie in recovering rounds in the infantry support role, the tanks
']re tanks were used to defend vital bases such disabled and damaged vehicles' proved deadly to camouflaged VC positions.
as airfields, but they were soon being used to
clear traiis through ihe jungle. When fitted with
a dozer blade at the front of the hull they
proved to be very successful in this role' A
tonstant danger tb tanks operating in South
Vietnam was the threat of mines, or unex-
ploded aircraft bombs rigged as mines While
iew tanks were in fact totally destroyed by
mines, lengthy repairs often had to be carried
out on the vehicle and considerable effort was
often required to get the damaged tank back to
the main base for repair.
Tanks were also widely used for destroying
Viet Cong bunkerswlth their 90-mm gnrns firing
hlgh explosive or canister rounds- with deadly
eflect; the heavy weiqht of the tanks also made
many of the tunnels cave in, trapping the Viet
Cond inside. The helicopter was used..on a
masiive scale in Vietnam butmany supplies of
fuel, ammunition, water and other essential
ffi
'tg,:"t
supplies had to be transported on roads that
w6re open to Viet Cong observation Tanks
F'", k.'
ilr
,
:.'gl a ' ,
I i-'j *
.",.:-
EIZ -'-
ffi Congueror heavY tank
:- - 91{ au'.rcrtzatlon vJas glven to com-
:-s:-:e 'je 445 tank prolect as the re-
:-i:enert for the A43 Black Prince,
,';:-:::self was based on the Churchrll
-:j::iil: suppofi tank, The A45 was in-
::::reci ic work $nth the A41 Centurion C on queror heavY tank cle arlY
:-x a:d share a number of common shoiing its 1 20-mm gun that tired
3l::=c11ve components, ln i946 it was separaie loading ammunition, and
:e::ced to clevelop a whole new the commander's cuPola, which was
:--:s cf amoured vehicles including atso fittedwith arangefinder and a
':-: FI/ZOO Universal Tank family, and 7. 6 2 -mm Q.3 - in) anti- aircraf t MG.
:cdition to the F1/201 basic gmn tank
-:-
: :::irer of specialized vehicles were only advantage of the Conqueror over gnrnner forward to the right and the mounted on the commanders :-:::
the'Centurion with the 20-pdr gnln was loader to the left. Main armament com- for anti-aircraft defence,
:::ccsed includinq an AVRE, mine- pnsed a 120-mm rifled grun wlth an
:-:l:rng vehicle of the flai1 tYPe, the former's tmproved armorrr protec-
b::dgelayer, ARV, assault Personnel tion and longer range of its main arma- elevation of + i5' and a depression of
ment. Its major disadvantaqes were -7" in a turret capable of traversing Specification
:=ler, and a number of sPecialized through 360'. A weapon stabilization Ctew:4
','::rcles for the Royal Artil1ery' The that rt was too large, too healry and
diffrcult to maintain. The Conquerors system was installed, this being similar Weight: 65 tonnes
l.'2'if series was based on the A45 but to that of the Centurion. A total of 35 Dimensions: length (qun fc:,r--'
::ai a longer hull, and the first Pro- were all withdrawn in the mid-1960s
with the arrival of the Cenhrrion with rounds of APDS or HESH ammunition 11.58 m (38 ft O in); lenqth (hu.Il - -- :
:::,,pe was completed in 1948, It was (25ft 4in); width 3,99m (13: - -
a.r'i lsalized that many of the prop- the 105-mm gun, and most enCed uP on was carried, this belng of the separate-
ranges as Ltard targets, althnugh one or loading type. An unusuai featwe of the height 3,35 m (il
ft 0 in)
:sei variants were not feasible: the Conqueror was the cartridqJe case Powerplant: one l2-cylinder pe::. = -
::.dcelayer, for example, would be two have been presewed.
-:: large-for the standard LCT A decr- in all there were over 30 Projected electron system: this ejected the spent gine developing 810 bhP (604 ki,-
rnodels on tire FV200 chassi,s, but the brass cartrrdqe case out through a trap Performance: maximum road s!e+:
s,:it was therefore taken to continue 34km/h (2l.3mph); maximui: ::=-
:e','elopment of the Centurion as a EJn oniy rnodel to see servlce apart from door on the right side of the turret, A
::::l< and as the basis for a comPlete tire Conquercr tank was th-e FV2I9 7,62-mm (0.3-in) machine-gun was range 155 lcn (95 miles); g'rade:-. :1.
ARVMk 1. Oneof themoreinteresiing mounted co-axial with the matn arma- per centi verttcal obstacle : -- -
:=r::ily of specia.lized vehicles, This (36 in); trench 3.35 m (11 ft 0 Ln)
projects was the fv215b hear,ry-self- ment, and a similar machine-gn:n was
!::ved to be a wtse decision, and the propelled anti-tank gun u;hrch had the
lenturion family became the most
.:ccessful tank of the post-war period, engine moved fon'riarcl to enable a
::=arning in service to ths day. limitecllraverse turret ia-rmed with a
There was, however, a requlrement IBO-mm gun) to be mounted at the
::: a heaw gun tank, the tV2l4, and rear.
-:e FV2O I was used as the basrs fbr this The layout of the Conqueror was
'.:h,Lcle. To provide some experlence conventional, rvith the dr1-,'er at the
'r,rth a tank of this size a chassis was front on the right ar:d ammunition to his
::ed with the complete turret rrf the left; turrel a::d fighting compartment in
Centwion Mk 3 tank and calied the the centre; and engine and transmis-
IV22l Medium Gun Tank Caernawon. sion al ihe rear. The commander was
Just under 200 FV214 Conqueror plovided vilth his own cupola in the
:anks were built between 1955 and centre of the tufiet at the rear, with the
-958, the maiority of these being de-
plcyed to the British Army of the Rhine
-.yhere they were issued to some of the T he C onquer or w as Broduced to
armoured regrments on the irasis of a provide long-range tire support to
:oop of three vehicles or one Con- the C entur ion, but w as phased ou t of
queror per Centurion -squadron. The service in the 1960s.
246
Centurions
in Acfion
\eretheir pe few mai or weapon-systems still in front-line sewice almost 40 years
94 introduction,-yetthecenturion,
*er activewith thatmostexperienciaGip
:arce, the Israeli army, first saw battle in the last days oI the Thirdileich.
-:e }:r:urion tank arrived just too late to take was even less call for tanks. Centurions of the RoyalAustralian Atmourd
:- any major operation before the end of
:,-.:- In such circumstances the Centurions were Corps armedwith 20-pdrguns inSouth l/jetnafit rn
l'' ::-j War II in Europe. A few did take part in often reduced to no more than mobile artillery the 1960s.In the background is a Centurjon Mk Z
*l :linor nfantry support operations, allow-
-i--e
ssme valuable tactical evaluation experi-
pieces. Their 20-pdr gmns sometimes joined iir ARV, while overhead is a RAAF lroquois
artillery barrages, but it was really a waste of helicopter.
:-:€ :c be gaured, The Centurion had to wait their potential. They did have theii successes, the Six-Day War proved a modei c: :t:.,'r
:;:: ive years belore going into real action. however, one of them spectacular to an ex- armoured forces should be handled v,.he:: : :-
-:e Centurton first saw combat in Korea, On treme when on one shoot a 20-pdr shell hit a ted against an enemy superior rn nr-rrebe:s- _-_
-l l'.:-;ember 1950 three squadrons of the Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-15 as it swept lowover the campaign against Egrypt the Israel: ::=;
i-:-3:s Royal lrish Hussars landed their Centu- a valley, right into the path of the shellsl used three main armoured task forces e;::-
:-::- I,k 3s at Pusanaspartof the United Nations But for much of the time the Centurions could ped mainly wrth Centurrons and pat.c:--s' :
:;sfgnsg to the invasion of South Korea by do little. In December IgSl the Sth Royal Irish lvith a few much-modified Shermans ir :"-:--:
l'::-ir Korea, Once ashore the Centurioni Dragoon Guards replaced the 8th KRIH and a These task forces advanced rapidly aga:::_1
::-eC aslngle squadron (equippedwith Com- year later the lst Royal Tank Regiment arrived numerically superior Egyptian forces ar::.ga
=: :rixs)that was to act as the regiment's recon- to take over from them, Not long after that the mainly with a mix of T-34 tanks and Si:-,-'_
:-:-ssance unit, and this force then became the armistice talks started and the fighting stop- self-propelled assault gmns. Fortunately rc:
-:::ured component of the British 29th Inde- pe!. The talks are still in progress to this day. Israeli tank columns many of the Egq,p:- ==
:e:dent Brigade, the main British contribution The first troops to use Centurions on a realiy armoured vehicles were dug in as hedjen:,;
:: :e Unrted Nations'effort. The main problem large scale in true armoured conflict were thi> strongpoints, which completely negatei :e:
.;:: ::e tankies' was that once ashore there was Israelis during the 1967 Middle East War, Bv mobility, and the Israelis were able to s,';eel
,::::ious little for them to do, On odd occasions 1967 the Israeli army had developed immense- past them to penetrate the Egryptian rear -:-
-r:=e tank-versus-tank scraps did take place Iy- in sophistication and numbers from the days meant that the task forces were able to rea::i
--i some results were achieved, but in the
is not a country suitable for
of the 1948 War of Independence They hdd the important Giddi and Mitla Passes and se-
=a:n Korea gnadually accumulated Centurions from anum- them off, The Centurions then prognessed
::
-=oured warfare, The bulk of the country is ber ofsources and through a diversity ofroutes, the Suez Canai. It was all over in six days
:,::r-rpied by bleak mountains and the coastal and their introduction to the Israeli army was tock only a small part in -re
:-=.:ts are small and built-up, so there is little - Centurions
far from smooth. The troops failed at flrst to fighting in the north against the Syiian forces
space for any large tank manoeuvres. Conse- realize the amount of maintenance and care There the armoured forces wer'e opera::-;
;:ent1y the Centurions were largely restricted that the fire-control and other systems deman- mainly in the Golan Heiqhts and the sr:rrour:c-
::- ,ocal support of infantry operations, Very ded. Gradually they tamed the complexitles of ing uplands, There was little opportunity for :e
::en thrs meant little more than advancing as the beast, for by I967 the Centwion had gained
:e infantry advanced. Even these limitedbp- a more powerful engine and the 105-mm LTA1
Israeli tankers abandon their knocked-out
Centurion tank. These tanks are taken off the
=:aiions
grew infrequent once winter and gmn was m use. battletield as quickly as possible, so that they can
::nch warfare set in during late 1951 and there It was just as weli that this was the case, for be repaired and returned to service
Damascus, But once again victory haci :-::
brought peace and the years follomng iSl:
were years of guerrilla operations and corr:el-
strokes. The Centurion units were often :-
volved in these counter-strokes which culnii:-
ated in the largest of them all the advance ::
Beirut that took place in June 1982.
When the Lebanese operation got uni::
way the Centurion was still an important Israe-
tank, but no longer the only one. it had bee:
supplemented by numbers oi the new israe-'-
designed Merkava, designed around mani' ::
the better points of the Centurion with oper-
ational innovations shown to be necessary c-;
the string of campaigns since 1967. The Cen-:-
rion had an innovation too in the form of srrr."
plates suspended all over the hull and lurre:
These plates were the israeli answer to i:
AT-3 'Sagger' and its many cousins. These
plates contain a speciai explosive detona:el
by the missile strike, and are intended to 'biar
out' the destructive jet of armour-piercn;
gases formed by the missile's warhead. Hc
Centurion of the Israeli armoured corps with I 05' army were equrpped with the L7 l05-mm gnm, successfui this innovation has proved to be s ";
mm grun and extensive external stowage on turret' A project to replace their
engdnes with new still uncertain as few missiies have been fuec
The Centurion has been in sewice with Israel for and more powerful diesel engrres with a re- against tanks in the Lebanon, Other innovatiors
some20years. duced fuel consumption also began. By this fitted to the Centwions include anti-tank mne
time the Centurions were betng supplemented rollers and ploughs, and a dozer blade, The
:Ipe of combat that took place in the Sinal and with larger numbers of Pattons of various marks Israeli Centurions can also tow ferrles ani
:nost of it was direct infantry support carried and even T-54s and T-55s captured from Syria bridcring equipment. The Centwion is stl1l a
3u: by small AMX-13s and Shermans, The and Egrypt, front-line weapon in the Israeli army and is sbL-
-rhole campaign against Syrian forces lasted In 1973 came the conflict now generally being modified to suit local requirements.
:nly27 hours. known as the Yom Kippur War. This time the Farther east, on the Indian sub-continent, the
On the Jordanian front Centurion activity was Israelis were caught napping as large Egryptian Centwion has been involved in all of the India-
jmited to company level in conjunction with forces crossed the Suez Canal and the Syrian Pakistan conflicts on the side of the Indian
iormations of modified Shermans, but although army swept down from the Golan heights. In army, Accounts of these conllicts vary accord-
,isefiI numbers of Centurions were on the the Sinai a series of desperate counterattacks, ing to which side is relating the story, but ii
stengrth of the Jordanian army, they seem to often using Centurtons, were thrown against would seem that in the tank-versus{ank battles
have been iittle used in the short operation that the Egryptian hordes, but the Israelis soon en- that did take place the Centurion proved to be
-ed to the Israelis'capture ofJerusalem, aprize countered the Soviet AT-3 'Saqger' wire- an able opponent.
fiat had evaded them in the War of Independ- gmided mrssiles that the Egryptians carriedwith
ence 16 years before. them and the Centurions suffered accordingly, AgainsttheVietCong
These costly counterattacks soon grew in Even farther east, in Vietnam, the Centunon
Israeli fighting skills cohesion and striklng power as more troops went to war with the Australian contingent that
The stunning successes of the Six-Day War and tanks joined the battle, Once the main added its weight to the American and South
',vere not won by the weapons alone, although Egyptian impetus had been spent the Israelis Vietnamese forces fighting the North Viet-
-:e Centurlons proved themselves to be excel- qained the ascendancy and even managed to namese, The Australian army has only one
ient battle tanks, They were able to pick off cross the Suez Canal before the fighting armoured formation, the Ist Armoured Regn-
'Jreir enemies at ranges of well over 2000 m ceased. ment, Royal Australian Armoured Corps, and
(2 185 yards), and they proved well able to Farther north the battle against the Syrians various squadrons from this regiment served in
absorb both battle damage and the ravages of was even more remarkable, There the Syrians Vietnam at different times. -They took with them
lcng high-speed journeys across desert ter- had carried out a full-scale set-piece armoured not only their Centurions but their Centwion
ra:n, But it was not just this alone that gave the attack against weak and unprepared Israeli armoured recovery vehicles (ARVs) and their
lsraelis their successes: it was in reality a com- units, Thousands of Syrian T-54s and T-55s Centurion bridgelayers. In Vietnam there was
brration of higth-speed manoeuvres, close co- moved forward in a great phalanx against the little enough in the line of armoured warfare to
cperation with other arms, and a high degree of Israeli posittons where only a lew tanks, includ- perform and their activities were largely con-
:arrung of all concerned, When these attri- ing Centurions, waited for them, It was to turn fined to local support and escort operations,
butes were combined with the seemingly natu- out as another David and Goliath result: wlth no with their main gnrns being flred only infre-
ral talent for the type of fighting concerned room in which to fall back the israelis had to quently.
foom Israelis drawn from all the nattons of stand their ground, With artillery and air strike The Centurion is still an intermittent active
Eruope and elsewhere, the results are more support they moved from point to point, con- service in South West Africa, The South African
understandable. What is not so understand- stantly firing at therr massed opponents who Defence Forces have a number of Centuriors
able was that the personnel concerned were seemed largely unable to operate lndepen- which they have updated to take locally-
largely reservists who had moved directly dently once the attack was under way. Single produced 105-mm gruns and new en9lines and
tom their homes and places ofwork into battie. Centurrons were able to pick off their oppo- transmissions. These modified vehicles are
These reservists had undergone a great deal of nents one by one until the areas in front ofthe known as Olifants (Elephants) and on occasion
lraining, but training rs no substitute for the real israeii lines resembled tank graveyards, The provide support for the deep-penetration op-
thing and the reservists got that in the Sinat. Israelis suffered heavily, not only in tanks but in erations against SWAPO gnrerrillas in Angola,
How they managed so well is still a bit of a men, but they held on long enough for the So the Centurion has seen its shares ofaction,
military mystery, but the Israelis proved they reserves to come into action and carry on the especially in the Middle East. It has always
have a flair for armoured warfare, and in the fisht proved itseif to bg a sound and sturdy vehicle
Centurlon it seemed they had the perfect vehi- When the shattered Syrian remnants fell capable of taking all manner of punishment, not
cle to carry out their intentions. back across the Golan Heielhts the israelis fol- only from the enemy but from long hard use
With the Six-Day War over the Israelis set- lowed. It had been a desperate slog. When the over difficult terrain. internally it is roomy and
tled once more to training, wrth the whole of the fiqhting stopped the Israelis had gained the weil-equipped as tanks go, and there is still the
Srnai to train in, The Centurions were gradually upper hand on both the main fronts, Large potential for the Centurion to endure maly
modernized with new radios, new fire-control amounts of captured material were in their luture campaigns, The Centurion will be
systems, and all the Centurions in the Israeli hands and they were at the gates of Cairo and around for a long while to come.
'
248
.txg
.f'
__i
,,1 I
.lI .:;:!iirt :!
:
i
*fW; .: .d*s''.
.::-
-
: : enturion AVRE (Assault Vehicle Royal
: Ahove: Centurion MkS a.rmoii:.!jrt bi i(rciria t/Fi: iti Ii,:Jarr.y:1sr:neff flenturionwith 105-mm gur. ii i:-.- -
: -
:. r s ), which is fitted with a {ront- rnou nted
;. ee the British army in tt avdling ar:l';,' . ii'.! ,. i.ir t'fu$sun:ir*e.. pf ]SS2.Iilatetheextra 12.7-r,:: .' : '
::::: blade and a 165-mm demalitiongun. requireci, k e bndge is swv;',,,. r {;c,: f * ;,: I 05..rnm g u:'r, anC the r e d a ir recoEl i :. :.-
l8A riegrees a.nd laid in posiri+:t .i.fulr {.tir l:Jl": iil!'r*i r"€dr"
'-.....-_':
<- .-t_ -1-: .
---'z'"..,,.
{ra
t
.r*
'!
.:'. :::: !
,?,. .]::F
;!rb..
,ii,;'.
. ,.;ip-i
'&.{
e+!'
', '"
250
air.:
3
ri
'\]&'-*"'
.:J:r:-'".=€=
=4'
=t*'!i!-:*.=-.-t'
i+iiP":++=-.-.
1r
-'::
- ri:t ...j,..:..
'a
:j:,.?*y*_
,' ::. i=
{.;.
Armoured Vehicles of the lg50s and 1960s
/d*d€dd/.
z,c l
ffi ti"t"rrMainBattle Tank
Vlckers' Elswick facility built many of
the 4,423 Centurion MBTs bullt by
1961, but the company realized that for
many countries Centurion's successor,
the Chreftain, would be too hearry and
too expensive. At about the same time
the Indian army issued a regutrement
for a new MBT, and in 196l the Vickers
proposal was accepted, This was
based on the company s private-
venture design which had become
known as the Vickers Main Battle Tank
(VMBT). This used the proven 105-mm
L7 series gnrn as well as some of the
components of the Chieftain MBT,
wluch was then about to enter produc-
tion at both Royal Ordnance Factory
Leeds and Vickers Elswick facility, in-
cluding the 12.7-mm (0,5-in) ranging
machine-9pn, Leyland L60 engine,
TNl2 transmission, atxiliary engine,
brakes and steering. The first two pro-
totypes were completed in 1963 and
by the following year a production ltne
had been establtshed in India, the first
tank being completed in 1965 from
components supplied by Vickers, But
as time went on India produced more
and more of the tank and by 1982 some
1,200 had been built, with production cally-operated smoke dischargers is Recovery Vehicle (VARV) rs provided Vickers Mk I MBT with tunet
continuing. In 1968 Kuwait ordered 70 mounted on each side of the turret, The wrth a front mounted dozerlstabilizing traversed to the right firing its 105
Vickers Mk I MBTs which were deli- Nigerian vehicles are fitted with the blade and a winch wrth a maximum mmLT rifled tankgun during a
vered betvveen 1970 and 1972. Marconi Radar SFCS-600 (Simplifted capacity of 25 tonnes which can be demonstration at the Royal
Vickers continued development of Fire Control System) which gives a increased to 65 tonnes if required. Armoured Corps gunnery range at
the tank with tts own funds, the first high probabrlrty of a flrst-round hit, Some vehicles have a hydraulic crane Lulwor th. The M k I is in sewice with
stage berng the replacement ofthe L60 This system is now betng fitted to some to enable them to change powerpacks Kuwait and India andr also
engnne by a Detroit Diesel, followed of the Indian lvlk I MBTs, The comman- (engine and transmission) in the field, manufactured in the latter counlry
by a new all-cast twret re'rth a welded der has a Pilkincrton PE Condor day/ under the name of the Vii ayanta; over
bustle which could be fitted with diffe- night sight which enables him to lay I 200 have been built there.
rent types of fire-controi system, In and flre the main armament, As usual a
1977 Kenya ordered 38 Vickers Mk lll whole range of optlonal equipment Llterature stowage
7.62-mm (0.3-in) magazine
17 105-mm ammunition
2siound bin
MBTs pins three ARVs; these were de- can be fitted to the Vickers Mark IIl stowage 18 Anti{as equipment bln
hvered by 1980, and a second order MBT, includinqr various radio installa- 13 Hand-grenadestowage T9 Drivefsseat
was placed in 1978 for a further 38 tions, passive night-vision equlpment, 14 Slewing ring 20 Sprayunitwaterbottle
15 7.62-mm(0.3-in)and 21 Fireextinguisher
MBTs plus four ARVs, a1l these betng fire extingruishinq system, a 0,S-in 12.7-mm {0.5-in) 22 Slghtstowage
delivered by late 1982. (i2,7-mm) M2 HB machine-gun to re- ammunitlon feed tray 23 Storagebin
In1981 Niqeria ordered 36 MBTs place the standard 7,62-mm (0,3-1n) co- 16 105-mm ammunitlon 24 '12.7-rm (0.5-in) ranging
6-round bin machine-gun
plr:s srx ARVs and five AVLBs. These axral machine-gun, deep fording kit, 25 7.62-mm (0.3-in) machine-
are being built at Vickers Defence full air filtration and pressurization, gun
Systems' new Armstronq Works, heater and so on.
whuch were opened late in 1982. The The Vickers Armoured Brtdqre-
famous old Elswick works, which pro- laying Vehicle (VABV) is fltted with a
duced armoured fighting vehlcles and bridse 44ft (13.41 m) long, which is
artillery pleces for some 100 years, has launched hydraulically over the front
now been closed down and de- of the vehrcle, The Vickers Armowed
molished,
The Mk III is also armed with the 3 Gunners periscope sight
105-mm L7 mounted in a turret which 4 Gunner'sseat
5 Loader'speriscope
can be traversed through 360" and pro- 6 Commander'sseat
vrdes the gun with elevation of +20" 7 Commander's cupola
and depresslon - 10", A 7,62-mm (0.3- 8 First'aid box
9 Map board
rn) machine-gmn rs mounted co-axially 10 Accesstoengineand
wrth the main armament, and a similar transmission
weapon is mounted on the comman-
der's cupola, The latter can be aimed
and flred from within the twret and be
elevated to +90'. A bank of six electri-
oEc
USSR
ASU-57 airborne
self-propelled anti-tank grun
The ASU-57 (ASU being the Soviet de- ASU-57 airborne self-propelled anti'
signation for airborne assault gnm and tank gan, armed with a 57 -mm CH'
57 for the calibre of the grun) was de- 5 1 M gun with a double baffle mu z zle
veloped in the 1950s specrfrcally for brake. For many years this was the
use by the Souet airborne divisions main sdlf-propelled anti-tank gan of
and was seen in public for the first time the Soviet airborne dt'vrsionsbuf ias
during a parade held in Red Square, now been replaced by the ASll-85,
Moscow, during 1957, The gmn is a de- which has a bigger gvn and much
velopment of the World WN II ZIS-2 improved armour protection.
M1943 anti-tank gun while its engine is Each Soviet airborne division has ASU-S7s could be carrted internally on
from the Pobeda civilian car, and the and has a long barrei with a multt- three rifle regiments, and each of individual pallets, Such pallets were
vehicle may well be related to the slotted muzzle brake, This was fol- these had one battalion each with provided rvrth parachutes and a retro-
OSU-76 self-propelled gnrn which was lowed by the Ch-51M, which has a three sx-gn-rn batteries with ASU-S7s, rocket system to soften the impact on
only developed to the prototype staEle, shorter barrel with a double-baffle giving the division a total of 54 such landrng,
The hull of the ASU-57 is of welded muzzle brake. Both weaPons have a weapons, In the USSR the ASU-57 is
aluminium construction with a uniform vertical slidinq breech-block and now used only for training ais it has Specification
thrckness of only 6 mm (0.24 in), which hydro-sprrng recoil system, and fire been replaced in front line use by the ASU-57 (with CH-5]M grun)
the following types of fixed ammuni- .ASU-85, which not only has a more Crew: 3
makes it very vulnerable, The engine
rs at the front on the riqht with the cool- tion: HE fraqrmentation (muzzle velcc- powerful En:n but also much rmproved Weight: 3,35 tonnes
ing system on the left and transmission ity 695m/2,280f1 per second), AP-T armour protection, It is interesting to Dimensions: lenqth (including gnrn)
at the very front. The opentopPed (muzzle velocity 9B0m/3,215ft per note that the ASU-57 was developed at 4.995m (16ft 42/s in); lenqth (hu11)
crew compartment is at the rear with second and capable of Penetrating rougrhly the same time asthe American 3.48 m (11 ft 5 rn); width 2,086 m (6 ft
the driver and loader on the right, and 85 mm/3.35 in of armour at 0'at a ranele M56 self-propelled anti-tank gmn wlth i0 in): heisht L 18 m (3 ft I07z in)
the commander, who also acts as the of i000 m/1,095 yards), and HVAP its 90-mm gmn. Powerplant: one M-20E 4-cylinder pet-
gunner, on the left, Forward ofthe driv- (capable of penetrating 100 mm/ When originally introduced, the roi engine developing 55 hp (4I kW)
er and commander is an armoured flaP 3,94 in of armour at 0" at a similar ASU-57 was packed in a special con- Performance: maximum road speed
which contains two vision blocks; range), A total of30 rounds ofammuni- tainer and tvuo of these were carried 45 km/h (28 mph); maximum road
when the vehicle is not tn the combat tion rs carried, and it is estimated that a under a T\rpolev T\r-4 heavy bomber, range 250 lcn (155 miles); gradient 60
area this flap can be folded forwards to well trained crew can fue a maximum one under each wing, On the Antonov per cent; vertical obstacle 0,5m
qive improved vision, The toP of the of l0 rounds a mtnute, The gnrn has An-12 rntroduced in the late 1950s, nryo (20 in); trench 1,4 m (4 ft 7 in)
ASU-57 can be covered by a tarpaulin manual elevatton and traverse, the for-
cover, and an unditching beam is often mer being from -5'to +12', and the
carried at the rear, this latter being a latter B'Ieft and 8'right, The vehrcle is
common feature on Soviet armoured often used to carry four ParatrooPs,
vehicles, The torsion-bar suspension and a 7.62-mm (0,3-in) machine-gmn is
consists of four single rubber-tyred carried, This can be dismounted for
road wheels with the ddve sprocket at use in the gnound role,
the front and fourth road wheel acting
as the idler, and hvo track-return rol- A,SU-57 advances across the snow
lers. The ASU-57 can ford to a depth of while hthe background an 85-mm
0,7 m (28 in) but has no NBC sYstem, auxiliary propelled anti-tank gan is
The vehicle is arrned wtth a Ch-51 or positioned. Note the unditching
Ch-51M rifled gnrn offset slightly from beam carried on the left side of the
the vehicle's centreline, The Ch-SI hullof theA,SU-57, and the driver's
was the first model lo enter service head in an exposedposifion.
ffi ['jroheavytank
During World War II the USSR de-
veloped a series ofheavy tanks includ-
rng the 1S-3 and IS-4 (alternatively JS-3
and JS-4) which were armed with a
potent l22-mm gnrn firinq separate-
loading ammunition and were Pro-
vided with excellent armoured protec- T- 1 0 heavy tank showing I 2.7-mm
tion. Post-war thts basic type saw ser- DShKM anti-aircraft machine-gun on
vice in the Middle East with Egrypt, and the commander's cupola. This tank
some captured by Israel in the 1967 has now been phased out offront-
war were then rised for static defence line service, although it is retained in
on the Suez Canai aqainst their former reserve and would doubtless be
owners, issuedrh time of war, as would older
In the immedlate post-war Period fanks sucfi as lfi e R- 34/ I 5.
the USSR continued the development
ofheavy tanks as did the United States areas with a high degree of anti-tank erun that rs provided with a double- mounted co-axial with the main arma-
(the M103) and the United Kingdom defences, where the T-10's heavY baffle muzzle brake and a bore ment, and a similar weapon is mounted
(the Conqueror), and amongr fudher armour protection would have proved evacuator to remove fumes from the on the ioader's cupola for antr-aircraft
prototypes burlt were the IS-5, 15-6, most useful, barrel, It fires separate-loading defence.
IS-7, IS-8 and IS-9. The last was The hull of the T-I0 is of rolled steel ammunition (projectile and charge) of The T-10 was succeeded by the T-
accepted for sewice as the T-10, an armour: the front is 230mm (9.06in) the following types: APC-T which will 10M, which has the following recogniz-
improved later model being cailed the thick, the sides and upper front are penetrate 185 mm (7.28 ia) of armour at able alteratlons: the 12,7-mm (0,5-in)
T-10M. It is believed that at least 2,500 I20mm(4.72 in) thick, andthe remain- 1000 m (1,095 yards), HEAT which will DShKM machine-gnrns have been re-
production tanks were built before der of the hull varies ftom 20 mm to penetrate460 mm(I8, I in)of armourat placed by the more powerful 14.S-mm
production was completed in the late B0 mm (0.79 to 3.15 in) thick. The turet a similar range, and HE fragrmentation (0,57-in) KPV series, which is used in a
1950s. The T-10 was never exported, is all cast: the turret mantlet ts 250 mm which is used against troops in the number of other Soviet AFVs including
ald none remains in front{ine servtce (9.B4in) thick, the sides are l00mm open and other soft battlefield targets, the BRDM-2 (4x4) reconnaissance
today. But as the USSR never scrapsits (3,94in) thick and the rear is 25mm SeparateJoading ammunition had to vehicle and the BTR-60P8 (8xB) APC;
tarks, the T-10s are held in resewe for (1 in) thick, The driver is seated at the be used as otherwise the compiete the 122-mm gnrn has a multi-bafile muz-
possible rue in any future conflict. The tont of the hull and the other three round would have been too heavY and zle brake in place ofthe double-baffle
marn role of the T-10 was to provide crew members in the tr:rret, with the difficult for handling in the cramped muzzle brake; the main armament is
long-range fire support for the T-54/ commander and gn:nner on the left and confines of the turret. A total of 30 stabilized in both horizontal and vertic-
T-55 tanks armed with 100-mm gmns' the loader on the right, The enQrine and rounds (30 projectiles and the same al planes; infra-red nighlvision equtp-
and also perhaps to act as the spear- transmission are at the rear ofthe hu]1. number of charqes) is carried, A 12.7- ment has been installed, as has an
head of an armoured thrust through Mainarmament consistsof a 122-mm mm (0.5-in) DShKM machine-gnrn is overpres$ue NBC sYstem; and finallY
254
T- I 0 heavy tank (continued)
E ['js+MainBattteTank
ln 1946 the USSR designed a new The T-54 tankwas developed in the
::rediwil tank called the T-44, and this late 1 940s and has probably been
;';as produced in small numbers be-
neen 1945 and 1949 although it was
:ct cqnsidered to be a satisfactory de-
=gn,
lri 1946 prototypes of a new de- produced in greater numbers than
srgm, the T-54, were completed and any other Soviet tankin the post-war
-l1s type entered productlon several period. It has also been produced in
-iears later. The T-54 and its variants C hina, Poland and C zechoslovakia
:;',-ere
buitt in larger numbers than any and has seen combat in countless
:iher Russian tank to appear after canpaigns since Wor ld War I I,
World War II, and by the time produc- especially in the Middle East, where
:cn of the improved T-55 was com- it has been used by the Arab states
:ieted in l9BO- I it ls estrmated that well againstlsrael.
:ver 50,000 vehicies had been burit,
Ihe series was also built rn Czechoslo- trained crew can fire about four rounds the hull just above the track, front-mounted dozer blade, and mine-
;al.ca and Poland for both the home per minute, and the types of ammunt- The basic T-54 was improved as the clearinq vehicles fitted with roliers,
3jrd export markets, while the Chinese tion that can be fired includes AP-T, years went by, The T-544 included ploughs and rocket-assisted devices,
produced an alrnost identical version APC-T, HE, HE-FRAG, HEAT-FS and stabilzation of the 100-mm gun in the to name but a few, In recent years the
iesigmated Tlpe 59, Further develop- HVAPDS-T. The last was introduced vertical plane, The T-548 was the irst T-54/T-55 series has been fitted with
:nent of the T-54 and T-55 resulted in some time after the T-54 entered pro- production model to incorporate infra- rmproved fire-control systems, tnclud-
-:e T-62. duction and will penetrate well over red night-visron equipment, subse- ing an externally mounted laser
The T-54 has an all-welded hull di- 200 mm (7,9 in) of armour at a range of quently retrofitted to earlier vehicles, rangrefinder,
'.lded into three compartments (driv- 1000m (1,095 yards). A total of 34 and its armament was stabilized in The T-5#T-55 series has seen ex-
.rs at the front, fighting in the centre, rounds of 100-mm ammunition ts car- both the horizontal and vertical olanes, tensive combat in the Middle East,
:nd engine and transmission at rear). ried, a poor quantity when compared The T-54C was not fitted with'an AA North Africa, Angola and the Far East.
The driver is seated at the front of the with contemporary Western tanks, MG, although such a weapon was refit- On a one-for-one basis Western tanks
:ull on the Ieft and steers the tank with One of the major drawbacks of the T- ted at a later date, The T-55 succeeded of the same period, such as the British
:onventional sticks, An unusual feature 54 family is that the main armament can the T-54 in production in the late 1950s Centurion and American M48, have
:f the T-54 is that it has a 7,62-mm (0.3- only be depressed to -4', which and has nurnerous tmprovements in- proved more than a match for the T-54/
r) machine-gmn fixed rn the centre of makes firingr from a hill or reverse cludrng more ammunition stowage, T-55, especially dwing the.fightlng be-
Jle glacis plate to ire forwards, this slope almost impossible, A 7.62-mm new 7,62-mm (0.3-in) machine-grr-rns, tween Israel and Egrypt and Syria.
being fired when the driver presses a (0,3 in) SGMT is mounted co-axtally and improved NBC protection, There
button on his right steering lever, The with the 100-mm qun, and a similar have been countless versions of the Specification
:ommander and gn:nner are seated on weapon is mounted in the bow. A 12.7- T-54 family, including a flamethrower Crew: 4
--he left of the turret, with the loader on mm (0.S-in) DShKM anti-aircraft tank, armowed recovery vehrcles (in- Weight: 36 tonnes
te right, The turret is a casting with
-jre top welded into position, One of the
machine-gnrn is mounted on the load- cluding Russian, Polish and Czech ver- Engrine: V-12 diesel developing 520 hp
er's hatch. The tank does not have stons), bridgelayers (built by East Ger- (3BB kW)
major weaknesses of the T-54 serles smoke dischargers as 1t can lay its own many, Czechoslovakia and the USSR), Dimensions: lenetth (with gun forward)
ras been its engnne and transmission, smoke screen by injecting diesel fuel dozer tanks, a combat engrineer vehi- 9 m (29 ft 67s in); lenqth (hull) 6.45 m
;vlnch have proved very unreliable in into the exhaust pipe on the left side of cle fitted wrth an hydrau[c crane and (21 ft 2 in); wrdth 3.27 m (I0 ft B3l+ in);
sen'1ce. helght (turret rooD 2.4 m (7 ft 10'lz in)
The main armament consists of a Soviet T-54 series tanks lined up in a Soviet T-54 with tuftet traversed to Performance: maximum,,toad speed
100-mm gnrn, whrch was developed street in Pragrue during the unrest in the rear, and the loader manning the 48 km/h (30 mph); maxrmum range
trom a naval weapon of the same C zechoslov akia in I 9 6 8, The white 1 2.7 -mm DS hKM anti- aircraft 400 lan (249 miles); fordincr 1,4 m (4 ft
ca]ibre and also used rn a modfied stripes have been a common machine-gan. The tank can also lay 7in); Crradient 60%; vertical obstacle
iorm in the SU-100 tank destroyer de- marking on Soviet vehicleswhen its own smokescreen by injecting 0.8 m (2 tI TYzrn), trench 2,7 m (B ft
veloped ln World War IL A well- inv ading other countries. diesel fuel into the exhaust outlet. I)r/c:-r:l)
Arnroured Worfare in the
ffiiddleEcrsf 1948-67
Together with the aeroplane, the tank has become the dominant symbol otwarfare
in the Middle East. Israel, often faced with seemingly overwhelming opposition, has
had to evolve an armoured force equal to any threat. As a result of this military
prowess, Israel has become the dominant force in the area. However, during the
earlyyears of the state of Israel things werevery different.
The War of Independence, which Israel had to good in parades this new Arab strength was Israeli MS I Sherman, with a modified turret armed
iqht from the very moment that the state of somewhat superficial. The Arabs lacked the with a French 105-mm grun and 7.62-mm co-axial
and I 2.7 -mm anti- aircraft machine-guns. The
israel was prociaimed, was fought mainiy with- technical background to maintain and use their
searchlight is mounted above the mantletfor
:ut the benefit of armour. Some tanks and other new weapons and, as time was to show, this target illumination at night.
armour were indeed involved, but this lnvolve- factor was one which enabled the Israelis to
nent was very limited. The Syrians were maintain thelr edge over the Arabs.
equipped with small numbers of old French The Israelis had few friends at that time. expertise of the Israelis, the Arab armies relied
,anki such as the Renault R-35, but these dated During the early 1950s they had to obtain tanks on tactical doctrines that emphasized the static
irom before 1940 and were little suited to the and other vehicles from whatever sources they and defensive, whrch was to prove to be exact-
nobile warfare that was prevaient in 1948 and could find, That often meant scrapyards, and ly what the Israelis wanted,
1949 The newly-formed Israeli army did gnaduaily the Israelis assembled a small nuc- That proof came during what is now known
cbtain a small number of Comet tanks thatwere Ieus of M4 Sherman tanks of various marks, as the Suez Campaign of 1956. Operating in
stolen or purchased from defecting British sol- some armed with old types of gmn, But it was a concert with the French and British fbrces, the
iers, but the mobile warfare that tookplace all start. The new state attracted immigrants many Israelis moved forward into the Sinai Desert
-round the borders of the new state was pri- ofwhom had technical experience and some of and the Gaza Strip. Using a combinatton of
:rarily the task of Jeep-carried infantry armed whom even had experience of armoured war- paratroop actions, air strrkes and constant
'.'rith little more than small arms, These Jeep fare. Using the small nucleus that soon grew to movement the Israelis soon isolated the Egyp-
'rnrts acted as independent mobile columns, about 50 M4s, the Israelis were able to form tian forces in the Gaza Strip and moved forward
cacked up in some cases by hastily-converted new tank unlts backed by numbers of old rapidly lnto Sinai proper, To a large extent the
armoured cars produced by adding steel plate American half-tracks that gradually replaced Egyptian armoured units were rendered impo-
:c truck and bus chassis, the leeps as personnel carriers. tent by an imposed doctrine of 'hedgehog' de-
The mobrle columns produced results totally fensive positions into which the T-34/85s were
cut of proportion to their numbers. Using deep-
Doctrinaire disadvant age laagered. Inside these positions they were
penetratron tactics, these mobile columns pro- The equipment brealcthrough came for the largely dug-in to act as armoured pillboxes.
gressively struck deep into the rear areas of Israelis in 1954 when the French delivered to This was not purely imposed doctrine as the
:ner.r Egyptian, Syrian and Jordanian foes and Israel I00 new AMX-13 light tanks armed with Egyptian tank crews were at that time suited
',';rought havoc, high-velocity 75-mm (2 95-in) guns. Some of the for little else. They suffered under an autocratic
By the end of 1949 the Israeli state was estab- new guns were tmmedrately switched to M4 command structure that had little flexibility and
.:shed and its foes routed, at least for the mo- Sherman turrets and so by the start of the 1956 allowed few movements to be made without
nent, Israel had to arm itself flrr the renewed campaign the Israeii army had three armoured deliberation and delay. Few of the Egyptian
rostllitres that all thinkrng lsraelis knew would brigades formed from AMX- 13s, various forms
come, Syria and Egypt gradually fell under the of M4 and some 200 half-tracks, Their oppo- Israel obtained its M48 tanks from West Gemany
-:rJluence ol the Soviet Unron and began to nents had the formrdable Soviet T-34/85, but not and the United States. Most of these now have the
:ecerve numbers of modern Soviet tanks, What all the Arab armour v',as modernt the Syrians 105-mm grun in place of the 90-mm gan and a diesel
:.rey did not receive was the education that still had numbers of old World War II German engine. They are equivalent to the American
.,',,ent
with such weapons, so while it looked PzKpfw IVs, Lacking as they drd the technical M4845.
256
Armoured Vehicles of the 19S0s and ig60s
:ank crews had the expertise to operate their
charges without supervision or even to main-
:ain their vehicles. Consequently the initiative
soon passed to the Israeiis, who swept past the
iefended positions, captured the essential
passes through the western Sinai and rapidly
:oved south to capture the port of Sharm-el-
Sheik on the Red Sea. To the north Israeli tanks
',',-ere on the banks of the Suez Canal but then
re French and British forces were forced by
:ternational reaction to halt their campaign.
lle Israeiis were also involved in the resultant
:ease-fire but by then their campaign was
:'rer, The battered and confused Egyptian
:edgehogs were forced into submission by
:eing starved of stores and food, and their
precious T-34/85s fell into Israeli hands,
The Syrians and the Jordanians made few
:cntrrbutions
-.raelis to the Suez campaign, but the
captured several PzKpfw IVs that had Soviet-suppliedT-54 ablaze. Fire is still the fittedwith afiresuppressrbn systemfor crew and
:een dug in as plllboxes. greatest tear of a tank crew; new tanks are now engine compartments.
Under the terms of the rmposed cease-fire
:e Israelis had to retreat from all their hard-
,','on gains, but what they had gaine_d froln
lhe
:ampaign was a new confidence in their ability
:: conduct armoured warfare. The Suez cam-
:a:gn in the Sinai had not been all headlqng
:ivances: here and there the Egyptians had
-::empted to put up some form of armoured
-3ht, but the israelis had then demonstrated a
::ctrcai skiil that enabled them to out-gn:n and
: l-manoueuvre their opponents. They re-
'. :aled
a nationai talent for armoured warfare at
.': levels from tank grunnery to brigade tactics
::,at was to place them in the forefront of
::moued thought for the future.
longtermbalance
The Suez campaign also brought the Israeli
::ate into the Amerlcan sphere of influence.
-:::er 1956 the United States began to provide
-sraei wrth new weapons that ranged from yet
:cre half-tracks to modern M48 Patton tanks.
I,lore tanks came from the United Kingdom, in
:e form of a large purchase of Centurion tanks Above:M51 Shermanwas based on theM4AI
',',-hich remaln the backbone of the Israeli Below: A graveyard of capturedT-54 tanks
chassis with HVSS suspensrbn. /n addition to the somewhere in Egypl.,Some of liese were rebuilt
r:moured brigades up to the present day. Air- new MS I gun it has numerous other modifications by the Israelis, with a new power pack and
:laft and artillery also started to flow to Israel, including a Cummrns dr'esel m odified suspension standard 105-mm M68 gan, as fitted to their M48,
: rt as their strength increased so did that of the and a new French SAMM grun contro! system. MGA, Centurion and Merkava tanks.
-::abs. The Soviet Union balanced the Israeli
:crease in strength and even exceeded it.
S,iria and Egypt received floods of arms of all
-cnds and this time Sovtet advrsers came with
re weapons to show the Arabs how to use
:rem, Vast trainrng schemes at all levels
:rowed the Arab armies not only how to main-
:arn armoured forces but also how to use them
-n masse. Within a few years the Eg.yptians
=nd Syrians were once again carrying out
:crder raids and sheliing Israeli territory. At
:rmes these raids grew into miniature
armoured conflicts with the Israells usually get-
:ing the upper hand and learmng all the time
row to use thelr forces to the best advantage.
The raids gradualiy increased rn strength
and regularity as the Palestine Liberation
Crganization (PI:O) guerrillas became in-
:reasingly involved. Things got to such a pitch
,hat in the end the Israelis came to consider
pre-emptive action. It came in June 1967,
The 1967 campaign became known as the
Srx-Day War. It started with a rapid series of
pre-emptive air strikes by the Israeli air force
cn Egyptian and Syrian air bases to knock out
rhe bulk of Arab air power and render its bases
unfit for operations. Whiie Israeli naval units
bombarded the coastai strip three Israeli
armoured formations of one or hvo armoured
cca
::-;aies each struck deep into Sinai. These
The Six-DaU TankWar
::-gacies advanced against several Egyptian Although assisted by pre-emptive and continuous air
:-s,:-3rl,s that had been fortif,ed in Soviet style. strikes, Israel's tank crews had nonefheless the awesome
-: '.';- ihe function of these positions to delay task of fighting on three fronts against theenormous
::-; Israeli advance untrl the new Egyptian combined might of many Arab armies. Using courage, skill,
=:-:-::red divisions couid come forward. They improvisation andguts, they turned and routedtheir
-.:rerrshad such a chance,
:-:',-er however, for the
rnoved with such speed that they were enemies and enacted one of the most spectacularvictories
-c-= :o laii on their unprepared foes before ever seen in the history of tankwarfare.
-,:-.1-',iiere fir1ly ready, Some fightlng did take
:.-:e around the fortified zones but the main
=::-oured conflict took place around Rafah
s:'.,1 the Gaza Strip, which resulted in an
-.::eir of
victory alter a desperate flve-hour fight,
-:'s Israeli success bottled up the buik of the "€'.,.;
e4-. *
:lptian forces in the Gaza Strip for later neut- -!*J;:'d ;r:i:i.
'-,6i:yi:. j
::-';atron by a specially-formed infantry/tank .id.'d! -'
: H.
----^i^ -i..?.
258
Armoured Vehicles of the 1950s and 1960s
lf lsraeli Sherman tanks have suf[ered heavy
4 casualtiesiptlictedbyJordanral Pdltons
positioned in olive groves. When the lsraeli
force retreats to regroup, the Pattons break
coverand follow, a running battle ensues
and a nar'rowvictoryfor lsrael results.
Jenin
t
!
I
f
i DamiyaBridge
a Amman
Jericho
r
F
t
b
,*y'
:,'t"1'P"
ii:iliilil
ji".tirj!;tr+:-:
Sinai Peninsula . :.rjjtit:t5j.
rlt
"ii{Lii.tri,ri
*;.
eAbu Zenimeh .: t ..:ti: :r;r:
. :lrj+l:ii
.:,. 1::
;iir,lrlli:lr'ir
..1:rr.ii:i:j-;Ij..
: ri.l:::tj]gr:
;.:',4';,).flr
''lli.lilt ri:1,'ri ...
:irrl,rll'
-l'':l'i.r. r,r,t,ll'
L'
'"'' :*=' *"''r*'
- .5';:::; .,'&;le'
6 lsraeliCenturionsadvancethrouoh lhe
rO lsmai'ra Pass, wh;ch is slronglyd6fended
by duq-in T-54 tanks. The Centurions with
their heavier armour move forward in the
centre, while lsraeli Pattons, which are
lighter and more manoeuvrable over soft
sand. rush around the rear of the defenders.
tRo
fE
Tie
Eifu heaw armo'red car
Panhard EBR (Enqin Blinde de
?.ecomarssance, or armoured recon-
r3-:ssarce vehicle) has the djstinction
:i being probably the oldest desigm of Since J 950 tlre Pa nhard EBR ( 8 x 8 )
araoured car still in service in the lras been llre sfa nd ard heavY
rcrld today, Its oriqdns can be traced armoured car of the French armn,
:: -337, when Panhard and Levassor of although its design dates back to
Pa-ris $aned desigm work on a new betore World W ar I I. An unusual
armowed car that would have superior feature of the vehicJer's ftalifs centre
.ross-country mobility to the 4x4 road wheels, which have steel rims,
a:moured cars then in use lvlth the are norm ally raised when travelling
French army, The flrst prototype was on roads and lowered only when
empleted in 1939 and was armed with going across country, so improving,
a 25-mm cannon and a co-axial 7.5-mm groind traction in mud and soft soils.
il 295-tn) machine-gnrn, Its most un- ated smoke-discharqers. In an oscillat- six rounds of ammunition. These
::sual feah:re was that of its eight road 1,200 vehicles had been built, In addi-
irheels, the four centre ones (hvo on tion to the French armY, the tYPe was ing twret the gun is fixed in the upper allowed 12 rounds to be fired very
cach side) were fitted wrth steel rims also exported to Mauritania, Morocco part of the turret which pivots on the quickly, after whrch the magazines had
j:r improved traction. For road use and Tuiusia. An armoured personnel Iower part of the h:rret, The 90-mm gnrn to be reloaded manually from outside
-.ese were raised clear of the ground carrier version, the EBR VIT, was also fires the following types of fixed the vehicie. The main drawback of this
by a hydro-pneumatic unit operated developed by Panhard on the same ammunition: HEAT (muzzle velocity combination was that the weight of the
cy' the driver, and iowered again when chassis, and a i'ew of these were ex- 640 m/2,100 ft per second), high explo- vehicle went up to over l5 tonnes,
;rossrng country, The PrototYPe was ported to Porhrgal where theY have sive (muzzie velocity 635 m/2,085 ft per while overall height also increased
iaken to North Aftica when World War been used mainly for internal secudty second), smoke (muzzle velocity and so facilitated detection in the field.
Il broke out, and its eventual fate is use, Today the EBR remains in service 750 rnl2,460 ft per second) and canister
udcnown, with the French army, although it is for close defence. A total of 43 rounds
Aier the end of the war the French slowly being replaced bY the much of 90-mm and 2,000 rounds of 7,5-mm
armv rssued a requirement for a new more sophisticated and exPensive (0.295-in) ammunition ls carried, Specification
hearn/ armoured car and, after a num- AMX-IORC (6x6) armoured vehicle Another unusual featwe of the EBR is Crew: 4
ber of proposals from French com- which is also amphrbious. it is ex- that the ddvers at the front and rear are Weight: 13,5 tonnes
panies had been shrdied, Panhard and pected that the EBR will not f,nally be each provided with a fixed 7,5-mm Dimensions: length (gun forwards)
Levassor was awarded a contract for phased out of sewice until 1987, some (0. 295-in) machine-gmn firing forwards, 6. 15m (20ft 2in); width 2,42m (?fi
a-n Bx8 vehicle while Hotchkiss was 50 years after it was first designed although in peace time this is rarely lltlqin); height 2.32m (7ft?Ysin)
awarded a contract for a 6x6 vehicle. ihe driver is seated at the front, with fitted. As with many armoured vehi- Powerplant: one Panhard I2-cylinder
Each company built two prototypes for commander and gnrnner in the centre cles deveioped in the 1950s, the EBR is petrol engine developing 200 hP
evaluation by the French armY, and of the vehrcte, the engine in the floor not fitted with an NBC system and has (149 kw)
tie Panhard and Levassor vehicle was and the second driver at the rear, The no infta-red night-vision equipment, Performance: maximum road sPeed
EBR is fitted with an FL-ll oscillating Some vehicies were fitted with the 105 km/h (65 mph); maximum range
subsequently selected for service as
the EBR. The first production vehicles turet armed with a 90-mm snrn, 7.5- FL-10 h:rret of the AMX-13 Iight tank 650 km (404 miles); grradient 60 Per
rvere completed in 1950, Production mm (0.295-in) co-axial machine-gnrn armed with a 75-mm grun fed by two cent; vertical obstacle 0.4m (153/a in);
'.vas completed in 1960 after some and hvo banks oftwo electrically oper- revolver type maqazines, each holding trench 2.0m (6ft 7in)
SWITZERLAND
260
Armed Forces of the World
RAFstrikecommond
Airborne defence As a second line of defence, No. 1 1 Group oper- Flying trom F"M Lossiemouth on maritime strtke
,refensive forces, administered by No. 11 Group ates six flights of Bloodhound SAMs on England's duties, the Buccaneer S.Mk ZBs of No. 208 Sqn,
'-:'n its headquarters at Stanmore, are also on the east coast, and two RAF Regiment units of short- along with those of No. I 2 Sqn, will IIy until
:-'eshold of a far-reaching programme of enhance- range Rapiers for point defence of Scottish air replaced by Tornados rh J 990.
-ert which will see the BAe Lightning and part of bases. Recently, 90 of the BAe Hawk T.Mk 1s used No. 29 Sqn's Phantoms usually opente trom RAF
-,-: VlcDonnell Douglas Phantom force replaced by forweapons training have been fitted with provision ConingsbyonUK air defence, butafter the
-,.-rado F.Mk 2s. Developed as a long+ange inter- for a paid of Sidewinders, allowing them to act as a Falklands con{lict of 1982 they moved to Stan@.
:::tor specifically for RAF needs, this variant of the back-up interceptor force. The squadronis nowNo.23 Sqn.
-:'^ado is equipped with Al.Mk 24 Foxhunter radpr,
':-' Sky Flash and two Sidewinder AAMs, plus a
l---m Mauser cannon.
-re RAF will take delivery of the first of 165
-:-'aCo F.Mk.2s in 1985, their first task being to
-:: 3:e two squadrons of Lightnings. Four Phantom
--:s ,,nrill be retained for as long as their airframe
::-. t on permits after the Tornado F.Mk 2 becom-
:s :cerational, although two of them are expected
:: :e the squadrons in RAF Germany, which are not
s:reduled to receive Tornado F.Mk 2s. When 15
:x-LS Varine Corps F-4J Phantoms are delivered,
^a',':_ been ordered in late 1982 to replace an air
re'ence squadron on the Falklands, six Phantom
siuadrons will be assigned to UK air defence pend-
-g Tornado F Mk 2 deliveries.
Equally as important as the Tornado is the BAe
\ mrodAEW.Mk3, 1l of whicharebeingconverted
,vith bulbous radomes at the nose and tail for air-
corne early warning, replacing the veteran BAe (HS)
Shackleton AEW.Mk 2. Operating farfrom base, the
\imrod AEW.Mk 3 will act as an advance radar and
control station. plotting low-level intruders such as
Soviet Sukhoi 'Fencer' attack aircraft and Tupolev
'Backfire bombers, and directing Tornado F.Mk 2s
on to their quarry.
Eyes over.the sea
r Augmenting the Royal Navy in its role of defend-
: ingthe UK'swater, No.'l8Group,with its headquar-
ters at Northwood, Middlesex, operates Strike
.; Commandls maritime patrol assets, in the form of
r ', four squadrons of Nimrods. Almost all of these air-
craft have now been converted to Nimrod MR.Mk 2
standard with advanced sensor systems for detect.
ing potentially hostile ships and submarines, their
Falklands exploits having provided them with addi-
tional weaponry such as self-defence Sidewinders
and Harpoon anti-ship missiles.
The more normal weapon against surface targets,
however, is the BAe Buccaneer S.Mk 28 and its
'
Martel missile. Two squadrons assigned to this role
will shortly receive the more potent Sea Eagle and
improved avionics to keep them in the front line until
the end of this decade.
Other forces in No. 18 Group include detach-
ments of Westland Sea King and Westland Wessex
helicopters for search and rescue (SAR), and two
BAe (BAC) Canberra squadrons. The latter provide
target facilities to all three services, additionally
functioning in the visual maritime reconnaissance
role in time of war.
Outside this threegroup structure, there were
until recently only a handf ul of aircraft operating with
Strike Command abroad: a Wessex squadron in
both Cyprus and Hong Kong, and a flight of Harriers
and Pumas in Belize, Central America. ln the after-
math of the Falklands war, the need to garrison the
islands has resulted in expansion of the RAF's over-
seas presence for the first time in many years, and
Port Stanley is now host to Phantoms, Harriers,
Chinooks and Sea Kings.
The events which brought these aircraft to the
South Atlantic were an unambiguous demonstra-
tion of Strike Command's primary duty: swift and
effective reaction to forces threatening the UK, its
interests and its friends. The considerable improve-
RAF S/urilce Command's Nimrod MR.Mk 2s operate major maritime patrol duties being protection of ments in potential now at hand will ensure that this
from Kinloss and St Mawgan, with one of their the North Sea oilfields . capability is maintained up to the end of the century.
l{o. 11 Group {HO: Stanmore, Middlesex) No. 18 Group {HO: Northwood, Middlesex)
No. 5 Lishtning F.Mk 6 Binbrook air defence No.12 Buccaneer S.Mk 2B Lossiemouth maritime strikd"
No. I Nimrod AEW.Mk 3 Waddington airborne early warning No. 22 Wessex HC.Mk 2 Finningley, SAR
No.11 Lightning F.Mk 6 Binbrook air defence Chivenor,
No. 25 Bloodhound 2 SAM Barkston Heath air defence Leuchars, -kJ
Wyton Valley,
Wattisham Leconfield,
No. 29 Phantom FGR.Mk 2 Coningsby air defence Manston
No. 43 Phantom FG.Mk 1 Leuchars air defence No. 42 Nimrod MR.Mk liMR.Mk 2 St Mawgan maritime patrQl"*.,
No. 56 Phantom FGR.Mk 2 Wattisham air defence No. 1 00 Canberra B.Mk 2/PR.Mk 7/ Wyton target facilities-
No. 85 Bloodhound 2 SAM West Raynham air defence E.Mk 15,TT.Mk 18
North Coates No.120 Nimrod MR.Mk 2 Kinloss maritime patrol
Bawdsey No. 201 Nimrod MR.Mk 2 Kinloss maritime patrol
No. 111 .Phantom FG.Mk 1 Leuchars air defence No. 202 Sea King HAR.Mk 3 Finningley, SAR
No.228 OCU Phantom FGR.Mk 2 Coningsby crew conversion Boulmer,
LTF Lightning F.Mk 3/T.Mk 5/ Binbfook pilot conversion Brawdy.
F,MK 6 Lossiemouth.
LAF Lightning F.Mk 3/T.Mk 5i Binbrook reserve pool Stanley (Falkland
F.MK 6 lslands)
No. 1 TWU Hawk T.Mk 1 Brawdy weapons training No. 206 Nimrod MR.Mk 2 Kinloss maritime patrol
Hunter F.Mk 6AJf .Mk7l (comprises Nos 79 No. 208 Buccaneer S.Mk 28 Lossiemouth maritime strike
FGA.MK 9 and 234 Squadrons) No. 360 Canbera T.Mk 17 Wyton target facilities
No. 2 TWU Hawk T.Mk 1 Chivenor weapons training No. 231 OCU Canberra B.Mk 2/T.Mk 4 Wyton crew conversion
(comprises Nos 63 No, 236 OCU Nimrod MR.Mk 2 St Mawgan crew conversion
and 151 Squadrons) No. 237 OCU Buccaneer S.Mk 28 Honington crew conversion
Planned additions Hunter T.Mk 74
F-4J Phantom airborne early warning No. 1 PRU Canberra PR.Mk 9 Wyton photo-survey
air defence SARTS Wessex HC.Mk 2 , Valley crew conversion
iv
-.. . iiij .