Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Students Name
Institution Affiliation
Professor’s Name
Association Between the PDSS2 Gene and How People Consumer Coffee.
Introduction
Genetics plays a vital role in how different people react to caffeine in various ways due to
their genes. Genetics even determines the way people around the world consume coffee.
Understanding the connection in detail is essential as some research has evident that coffee
increases the quality of life. Caffeine can categorize people in terms of genes and the
consequences that the consumption of coffee brings into the various life functions. This paper
determines the genes that impact the way people consume coffee in their lives; the articles will
be compared by selecting the hypothesis used by the research scientist and the fundamental
Hypothesis
The study by Higgins (2016) suggests that there is a gene that is known as PDSS2 that
plays a massive role in identifying the way people use coffee and how they metabolize caffeine
in different ways. The studies were conducted to determine the impact of gene PDSS2 in people
who consume coffee and how caffeine metabolizes through the consumption of coffee. The null
hypothesis of the articles is PDSS2 does not affect the way people drink coffee and does not
affect the way people metabolize caffeine (Higgins, 2016). The alternative hypothesis for the
articles is to study the impacts of PDSS2 on how people consume coffee and how they affect the
metabolisms of caffeine in different people. The study done by Higgins (2016) shows the effect
of the gene PDSS2 on how people metabolize caffeine and realized that those with the gene take
less coffee than those who have less or no pdss2 (Higgins, 2016). The research has answered the
hypothesis of the study. On the other hand, the article by Pirastu et al. (2016) has highlighted the
relationship between the PDSS2 gene and the consumption of coffee. The results have answered
The first article is a news report that reports research conducted in a genome study
association to study the DNA and the discovered a gene known as the PDSS2 that affected how
people metabolize the caffeine's from coffees (Higgins, 2016). On the other hand, the article by
Pirastu et al. (2016) is conducted through the genome-wide association of study in Italians
pupation that was done through the use of additive, dominant and recessive models that
determines the association of the PDSS2 gene with the way people consume coffee. The
genome-wide association study (GWAS) is a research method used by genetics to relate the
specific variations of genes with a particular issue or disease (Uffelmann et al., 2021). This
method involves the scanning of the genomes from a different population. The main reason is to
look for a specific genetic marker and use the feature to identify and understand how genes can
contribute to the development of a disease and come up with strategies to prevent and treat the
diseases. Both articles have not given details on the experiment, although they emphasize the
The results of the article done by Higgins (2016) show that different people need to take
less coffee to feel the impact because their bodies are used to break down the caffeine in
different levels in the levels of a gene. On the other hand, the study by (Pirastu et al. 2016) found
out that the gene FDSS2 shows a negative regulation on the expression of the gene on caffeine,
and it is linked to coffee consumption. The articles reported similar results that were found in the
researches. However, the pieces are too short, and therefore it means that the reported results
Conclusion
In essence, the PDSS2 gene affects and impacts the way people consume coffee and
affects caffeine's mentalism in different people. The results have shown that some people only
need to take less coffee to move coffee; hence, it negatively affects the amount of coffee they
consume. The new finding is similar to the results that are presented in the two articles.
References
Higgins, M. (2016). Science says this is why you hate coffee. Yahoo.com. Retrieved 14 October
141434203.html?
guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly9tYWlsLmdvb2dsZS5jb20v&guce_referrer
_sig=AQAAABAjaGzfjNm1p9XQ52d3dBa6AIXzS1YNtkp8V0aRFNi-
zUVmU7dZyK0vk2ROmPjMpucW3UYZJTb9XXrG5iu91F4ey8d_szh8rtvoDQ3TNuR0
onc5meToaHrw1YPMVUW00b5X1sAQ-
0_COOSwWnG5pMjSyaaUEfgbWOCcxYJDraKo.
Pirastu, N., Kooyman, M., Robino, A., Van Der Spek, A., Navarini, L., Amin, N., ... &
https://www.nature.com/articles/srep31590
Uffelmann, E., Huang, Q. Q., Munung, N. S., de Vries, J., Okada, Y., Martin, A. R., ... &