You are on page 1of 3

Republic of the Philippines

SULTAN KUDARAT STATE UNIVERSITY


COLLEGE OF GRADUATE STUDIES
ACCESS, EJC Montilla, Tacurong City
______________________________________________________________________________

VALIDATION INSTRUMENT

Name of Juror:_________________________________ Current Position: __________________

Instruction: Please indicate your degree of agreement or disagreement on the statements provided
below by encircling the letter which corresponds to your answer. The statements are taken from the
criteria for evaluating survey questionnaire set forth by Carter V. Good and Douglas B. Scates.

5 – Strongly Agree
4 – Agree
3 – Undecided
2 – Disagree
1 – Strongly Disagree

Criteria Options
1. The item of the questionnaire is short enough so that the senior
citizens and the personnel of OSCA and DSWD will be able to 5 4 3 2 1
answer it within the allotted time.
2. The questionnaire is interesting and has an appeal such the 5 4 3 2 1
senior citizens and the personnel of OSCA and DSWD will be
induced to respond to it and fully accomplish it.
3. The research instrument can obtain in – depth answer and 5 4 3 2 1
avoid guesswork.
4. The questions and their alternative responses are neither too 5 4 3 2 1
suggestive nor to dull.
5. The questionnaire can elicit responses which are definite and 5 4 3 2 1
not conflicting.
6. The questions are stated in such a way that the senior citizens 5 4 3 2 1
and the personnel of OSCA and DSWD can understand them
clearly.
7. The questions are formed in a such a manner to avoid 5 4 3 2 1
suspicion on the part of the senior citizens and the personnel
of OSCA and DSWD concerning hidden answers in the
questionnaires.
8. The item is neither too narrow nor limited in its content. 5 4 3 2 1
9. The indicators of its main variable really suit the objectives of 5 4 3 2 1
the study.
10. The answers to the problem when taken as a whole, could 5 4 3 2 1
answer the basic purpose for which the research instrument is
designed and therefore considered valid.
Comments/Suggestions:
_______________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________

AILYN O. TRAVILLA
MSWDO
Municipality of Isulan
National Highway, Kalawag III,
Isulan, Sultan Kudarat
(Member - Validation Committee)

Republic of the Philippines


SULTAN KUDARAT STATE UNIVERSITY
COLLEGE OF GRADUATE STUDIES
ACCESS, EJC Montilla, Tacurong City
_______________________________________________________________________________
CERTIFICATION OF CONTENT VALIDITY
To whom it may concern;

We, the undersigned have thoroughly scrutinized and checked the Survey Questionnaires
presented to us by ROZEL G. MALIFICIADO. We have convened to discuss about the strength and
weaknesses of the Research Instrument for its improvement that will appropriately suit to the
objectives of the study.

This is to certify that the Research Instrument is valid.


Done this _____ of October 2021.

AILYN O. TRAVILLA CECILIA P. GAMPONG


MSWDO OSCA Head
Municipality of Isulan Municipality of Isulan
National Highway, Kalawag III, National Highway, Kalawag III,
Isulan, Sultan Kudarat Isulan, Sultan Kudarat
(Member - Validation Committee) (Member - Validation Committee)

AMIE L. ABELLERA MA. EMERALD JADE DEVARAS


OSCA Focal Person Araling Panlipunan Department Head
Municipality of Isulan DepEd – Isulan National High School
National Highway, Kalawag III, Capitol East, Kalawag II,
Isulan, Sultan Kudarat Isulan, Sultan Kudarat
(Member - Validation Committee) (Member - Validation Committee)

ANALIZA G. SUMIDO, Ph.D.


Master Teacher III
Esperanza National High School
Esperanza, Sultan Kudarat
(Member - Validation Committee)

HARON B. KARTIL
Education Program Supervisor – Araling Panlipunan
DepEd – Sultan Kudarat Division
Kenram, Isulan, Sultan Kudarat
(Chairperson - Validation Committee)

You might also like