Republic of the Philippines
MINDANAO STATE UNIVERSITY- GRADUATE SCHOOL
General Santos City
Name (Optional): _____________Supplementary Learning Material: LAS # ___
Topic: ____________________________ LOV # ___
Acceptability Questionnaire for Supplementary Learning Materials
Direction: Statements below evaluate the level of acceptability of the Supplementary Learning
Materials. Kindly check the column that corresponds to your rating using the legend below:
Scale Remarks Verbal Interpretation
5 Strongly Agree Highly Acceptable
4 Agree Acceptable
3 Moderately Agree Moderately Acceptable
2 Disagree Less Acceptable
1 Strongly Disagree Not Acceptable
Statements 5 4 3 2 1
A. Objectives of the Supplementary Material…
1. Are clearly presented that I can easily understand;
2. Express the knowledge and skills that I need to develop;
3. Are specific and attainable;
4. Are based on the topics provided in the self-learning
modules;
5. Are related to the discussion and activities in the self-
learning module.
B. Content of the Supplementary Material…
6. Provides pictures and illustrations to help me understand
the lesson better;
7. Contains topics that are practically related to each other;
8. States objectives, discussions, and attainable activities;
9. Help me develop my mathematical learning skills;
10. Are clearly presented that I can easily understand.
C. Topics of the Supplementary Material…
11. Are appropriate to my comprehension level in
Mathematics subject;
12. Are parallel with the objectives and activities;
13. Help me acquire new knowledge, understand
mathematical concepts, and develop mathematical skills;
14. Provide a range of my interests and preferences;
15. Are sufficient to allow me to learn independently.
D. Activities of the Supplementary Material…
16. Are in order to keep my interest in each phase of the
learning material;
17. Provide different activities and chances for my
improvement in understanding the lesson;
18. The exercises stimulate my comprehension and learning
ability;
19. Give direction in simple and understandable manner;
20. Help me attain the objectives of the lesson.
Note: This instrument is adapted from the research of Castillo (2021). The revisions are parallel to
the original items but made more personalized from the student’s point of view.
Republic of the Philippines
MINDANAO STATE UNIVERSITY- GRADUATE SCHOOL
General Santos City
VALIDITY EVALUATION ON THE ACCEPTABILITY QUESTIONNAIRE FOR
SUPPLEMENTARY LEARNING MATERIALS
Name of Evaluator: _______________________________________________
Position: ________________________________________________________
Institution: ______________________________________________________
Educational Attainment: ___________________________________________
Directions: This tool asks for your evaluation of the researcher-modified questionnaire that
will be used in gathering the data of this research to establish validity. You are requested to
encircle the appropriate number which best reflects your assessment. Please write your
comments and suggestions on how to improve the test.
SCALE VERBAL DESCRIPTION
5 Very Highly Valid The questionnaire is valid and can provide unbiased data,
allowing 0-5% error.
4 Highly Valid The questionnaire is valid and can provide unbiased data,
allowing 6-10% error.
3 Valid The questionnaire is valid and can provide unbiased data,
allowing 11-15% error.
2 Less Valid The questionnaire is valid and can provide unbiased data,
allowing 16-20% error.
1 Not Valid The questionnaire is valid and can provide unbiased data,
allowing 21-25% error.
CRITERIA RATING
1. Clarity of Directions. The directions are written in a very
clear and understandable manner.
5 4 3 2 1
2. Intelligibility of Items. The vocabulary, structure, and
concepts are appropriate to the level of the respondents.
5 4 3 2 1
3. Singularity of Interpretation. The items are simple, clear,
and free from multiple interpretations.
5 4 3 2 1
4. Suitability of Items. The items represent the coverage of
the study, thus measuring what it intends to measure.
5 4 3 2 1
5. Adequateness of Items. The number of items is an
excellent representative of the research coverage.
5 4 3 2 1
6. Organization of Items. The items are presented in an
organized and logical manner.
5 4 3 2 1
7. Objectivity. The questionnaire has the ability to gather
factual data, eliminating biases and subjectivity.
5 4 3 2 1
8. Time. The questionnaire can generate complete data within
the time frame allowed to obtain data.
5 4 3 2 1
9. Usefulness. The questionnaire is capable of generating
data that will be useful in representing the learning outcomes
5 4 3 2 1
of the respondents.
10. Attainment of Purpose. The questionnaire as a whole
excellently fulfills the purposes for which it is constructed.
5 4 3 2 1
COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS:
_________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________
Signature over Printed Name of Validator
