Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Structural Design Solutions
Structural Design Solutions
="'.?c.>c>O f>.>1
t d• 15'
1
FE Review-Sturctural Design
1 - - - - - 18"- - -
l A~ ~
C. 145.6 kip . ,
. ., .j '
. .
"'
D. 300.7 kip Iv\ 2--
~ .j
. .J
4
,
' ' ...
.j
,
.,
,_
4~ -:-( ~j{
7#6 bars
C>. ~11./)
- 4
.j
' ~
S IL,~
f<:z l ~,,
2
FE Review-Sturctural Design
3
FE Review-Sturctural Design
From the hoices below, what is the lightest wide-flange shape (FY= 50 ksi)
available that can resist a service dead load of 125 kips and a service Jive
load of 200 kips (using LRFD)? For this column, take Kx = Ky = 1.0 and L = 15
feet
k..?\ hy = (
J-'/ = 5"""0 ~t '=
~ 01~·-
1,...J~-A I~ A 'I.. I _s (::, 0 \JS 1Lµ~
4
FE Review-Sturctural Design
Lp = L), 1 3 J-
L.r == '~- ~ ~
M-r ~. Z c.. c, k 1p-J--t-
M~ = ~c.> :a. k-,1 - 1+
l>~ =- ""Z..Z, 2- k.,p
5
FE Review-Sturctural Design
The bolt layout for an L6x4x3/8 of A36 (Fy = 36 ksi, Fu= 58 ksi) steel is
shown below. 5 bolts that are 3/4 inches in diameter are used. What is most
nearly the design axial capacity, 4>P n, of the member? For the purposes of
this problem , you may neglect block shear rupture and bolt capacity.
'Fy:: ~ b \l-S\
A. 14 kip c:
diometo- bolts
L6 X 4 x)
8. 83 kip t=
'3.
-liA
'
8'
C. 117 kip 1.75 1
D. 169 kip - 4.0 -
6
FE Review-Sturctural Design
• A floor syste.m for use in an office buitding uUHzes 45-foot-Jong floor beams
spaced at 9 feet The f1oor wm be subjected to a service dead load of SO psf
and a unreduced service live load of 80 psf. Using LRFD load combinations,
what is most near11 y the max.imum factored bending moment on a given floor
beam?
A. 126 ft-kip
B. 363 ft-kip
C. 428 ft-kip Di. ~ S--o f, J-
¥~
I
I
l) ~ l. 1... o +
L. I. h L.~ =- I, ' - 7 ( -.--,~
>'--' P".. &" ) --/- / ,/,,,. ( f:,l,Lp.r j j ~
7
FE Review-Sturctural Design
24"
21.5"
D-.. =- A.!, /y
0.t;.S-i'Jo •••• 1
,,,L--- 12" _ __ _,,/
1 c., .._. 0
0 ~~-~~~-~) =
8, ? el I I'\.
cp -
8
FE Review-Sturctural Design
I
C/\. -= -?
> c:::, '" - -z. ;, '" -
-- 2. '"
2.. = '- "', ~ '"'-
-::> -- ,
30"
JG
-.-. -.-.--r---
f
•••• t
L.t1
N
b /~ ' v'\.
9
FE Review-Sturctural Design
As=3in 2
3-No. 9 bars (tension)
23"
__A_s_J_Y__ ~ '?.. ,,._2- ( 4o ~)
20"
o. ~s- J-.. .' b
•
• •____ ....,,/
l
/- 12"
c. u.,,.._Jc -e. s-r e:, Lv 1-1 1 c... H p ~ ov , l-:>e ..s ..A---1 orz... E" -rr ;Al\ i;; r=-0 12-. ~vA-'-vJ...A,,. ,to .....J
I~ T ~e t="'vt'-•-....r r· bF A F ...""-I L C..-f?e.
10
FE Review-Sturctural Design
,_,.,., . If"
··' \ ,"-Ctr'-"\...')
· - -· ---- : ....... , ..
,J I (2-)S, 11?Jl-..f>
v',,,,.- -~ ;>
6:,
1 A"~2.As ()i)
V
\l\J : - \.-z_ \}t> + ) 'b \)'- := - - --- --- ·- - -··••··•-.... .. ,. _____ •••m .. ·v, , •..• .•..
s-r, eJ'lu(>.>
'i.t'~u, ~~..P
s == I 2.. IV\
O.c..(
11
FE Review-Sturctural Design
' 21.5"
(lf)¼!d
••••
/----.. 14" _ _ _ ,,.
3"
I
A> -l\.s :::
~ - (A~ - A; )J"
o.o-r :.t~ 6
M "' ~ 1---/ l (As - A ~ ) ( d - ~J + A') ( c,( - d 1
)
12
FE Review-Sturctural Design
)
'0( \
u
~ \,
)"\',._,.
_J ·<i
-i . ~
~· -
\
'V
- Sl
'' ·---.-·"
.J....
\.L..
1-
13
FE Review-Sturctural Design _i,P==-1... t..>O k1,.P
y ///.,,/j p,~
Find the available design strength for a W12x50 column.
I'
Pinned-Pinned ~ y:;-, Y~o- fl 'leJ:>
P=200 kips I
L=22 feet
-I<.
Wl"Z..Y.S-0
A= 11...1,(::, 111\'l.-
p~ 11:o,Z..- - r A ( s ( _ ~ C- A -7. j
K-= / ~0~ F1X€f:>-F1xEp
_) --
)L.
14
FE Review-Sturctural Design
' ii
{\ l
I
c) (c
p~:1~5='
f
'2
AJ =::
-
-re-·
L(
cA 1:- -re- ( l
c1
O I ...._ )
'C"' '"") I "'f \ II\
,._, t~V'I'
I ·..,.."""··
ft"'"
p.._ bC:>O /c_, .,,,
-- b't
l(~ - = C:>,
I
rp J.(.. 'A 'o 0.--, ( i, r:..:. ,)(s,'f ,vi"'-
15
FE Review-Sturctural Design
_, - ) ,;-, v--..
0(--c_ -
10 ft
beam
cross
section t L/z._
r
I
Neglecting beam self-weight . and based only on the
· allowable momei1t capacity of the beam as determined
using A1nerkan Concrete Institute (ACI) strength
design specifications, the maximum allowable. live load
is most nearly P':7 f ,;-~
-~ (A) 23,000Jbf Mu=- /, z_ M~ +- I. t,,. M\..
(B) 29,000 lbf
(C) 35,000lbf
M" ::- \, l-( w; L) -,- t. to( ¥-)
(D) 50,000 lbf
o.. :::- A::. tr -:::- (3 I"'-) (t10.ooops~ _
:s. 9 2.. '"'
o.s;;-J~ k, o, '6~ LsDoo')(_ 12 1"')
. o .~~.2D,C,.>o, "~
;.s, f;1-1~·,d =- o. ~r
c.. ::- 3,q-z._ ,"1 ::- <..t,b/
0, ts.S-
~ ::=: C,, 0 05, _/_ cJ.__ 0. _ b • l> (..) ~ ( ' s-; "" - ~§:..0 - o . oo h g:· -> o , ooS-
'- --- '-/, 4:,/
~"o ¢ = 0, °t
M"'- :::- As fy ( J.- t)====- ~'"'._(L1ooooP~ 1){ 1 ~11-1- 3 ~-z._) 7:' (. ~lLf 'rf( tu)l II\- \b
Ml/\.=- \s"bll ~00 lll\•lb ( ftJ;
I 2., ~
\'3DLJ00 A-- lb
( 6, ~) { I~ D ½OD f.e_-( 6) -:=- / -s;'_A... )J, + LJ j>L..
PL.~-z1»sCo ,-zSf-.t.-lb
16
FE Review-Sturctural Design
2 . A floor system consists of ten 30 ft long reinforced
concrete bean15 and a continuous 5 in deck slab. (A typical
section is shown for the deck and two of the beams.)
Assume the beams are underreinforced.
. 15 in
· .....
. As
17
FE Review-Sturctural Design
3. The cross section of a reinforced concrete beam with JD~ < {l.1 f..l
tension reinforcement is shown. Assume that the beam
is underreinforced. v~:: ,-r- ), (__j I
12 in 8,'
;;. -= f IA
p~ ,s-~
ch
.20in
oli= \)t,,-= Z. /ow d.{f: :- (2)(1l,"')(zo,_.~ooup),
23in
~l~J
3- No. 9 bars
AJ~n.)(1,-1i-): 3,"'1.. \)" ::: I_ L- \)0 +- l, &, Vl, -== I• l ( s/t1t1) +/, b ( 1 (7, 11 j
1: = 3000 lhf/in 2
Jy = 40,000 lbf/in2 ·
As 3 in2 [three no. 9 bars]
Vv > cf> Ve--
A:= 1 in2 ~O ;, ( 0 •) .s) ( 2;.1.,, >)
If the dead load shear force in the beam is 5 kips and the > 0 Jl.1.LI > 14 .7 2. S-lt..p>
live load shear force in the beam is 15 kips, then the
minimum amount of shear reinforcement needed for a
center-to-center stirrup spacing of 8 in based on ACI \)"':- ~ -;;. \],_+\Js
strength design is most nearly d>
(A) 0.10 in2
~ -:: 2-c..,-i + '1»
(B) 0.12 in2 o . >S-
• ·2
-~ (C) 0.14 Ill
-->
:: Av (lfo $)tz..o ,., _"\
't--
Av ~ o ·I> 7 1t-1.
18
FE Review-Sturctural Design
I
4. The span length and cross section of a .reinforced J~ =: 2 s-uo
J.,
·
-'"'""\.-
concrete beam are shown, The beam is underreinforced. p C.l..:>c> Lb
The concrete and reinforcing steel properties are }7 ;;- - , c·
,..,"t..-
f~ ~ 2500 lbf/in 2 fv = 50,000 lbf/in2, and As = 3.8 it?.
j
3./, . . 'Z-
A~ :-
{~
_ _s_tt._ _, Pi. :;-- ~0 UC--'0
IL , .,._
__s -
14in
19
FE Review-Sturctural Design
5. A floor system< consists oL30 r.einforced concrete
beams and a continuous 4 in deck slab. (A typical sec-
tion is shown for the deck and two of the beams.)
Assume .the bearns are .underreinforced.
\pa., ..~· Lx6;"
40in
f~ -- 2800 lbf/in2
f 11 - 42,000 lbf/in2
L = 30 ft [sitnple spanJength]
/11,, :,,-
~l. L 'L/ /<,~ • M (,!:-)
t t-, "'-
9 q ~ . r .s. /l -/,._ 1-fJ
611..--
20
FE Review-Sturctural Design
6 . The span length and cross sectio11 of a reinforced J'l-= -sr c..o f'n
concrete beam are shown. 'l'he beam is underreinforced. dy ; > .5G,c)o r~,
The concrete and reinforcing steel properties are
,,,, = 31·0•0·.· 1b·f/.HI~,
.JC
· 2 ' an
· .?: ;1· y· · ·3·,.,o, oo·o·•·1b·f/•III .• ·nr.
· · d A. s - 2··5 .?.
As :: 7. ,:;;- , "' '?...
4ft.
. . ··1. .
9.5 in
1-----1
16 in..,-c.1_1_3'--in_1,..... l:i;J
beam
cross
section
8ft
21
FE Review-Sturctural Design
. .
20in
e,.._ -=- A~ Jv
48in
o.1s< cf b~
22
FE Review-Sturctural Design
8. The cross section of a reinforced concrete beam with
compression reinforcement is shown,
23
FE Review-Sturctural Design
( 9.; A monolithic slab-beam .floorsystem is supported
oh a column grid of 18 ft on centers as shown. The / ._J
dimensions of the cross section for the beams running
in the north-south direction have been detennined.
18 ft 18 ft
.
t. . .
.
N
_L S' PA .,J l£ A-JC,TH
18 ft 'i
lLle, -:;c
{S-1'\~1..=51'"""\
ldw+ll>'-"5--
18 ft
3@ 6ft '""--
(a}
7L,~
I~.··... I
15 in
(b)
24
FE Review-Sturctural Design
1. For the short, concentrically loaded round spiral
column shown, the applied axial dead load is 150 kips,
and the applied axial liveload is 350 kips.
f~ = 4000 lbf/in 2
fy = 60,000 lbf/in2 d> ~c:,.7
18 in
V
r P• -· / r-o 1'-nn >
longitundinal
reinforcernent
(B) no. 8
t(;) no. 9
(D) no. 10
=
25
FE Review-Sturctural Design
2. For the short, concentrically loaded square tied col,
umn shown, the applied axiahlE:adload is150 kips, aild ~ ~ , S-o fc Ip 5>
the applied axial live load. is 250 kips.
t; = 4000 lbf!in2 'P\.... - z..s-o l 1tJ
fv = 60,000 lbf/in2
18in
4,::- C!:>-'~ 13 ,s-<
J.v..,,._-:;;. 0, D /
longitundinal
rei nforcement
As,-- =- 0, 2.. 1..1 1.r '"''- (Lt:L> T f-l A-l ,.(,11.J VA'l-ui: o+ ~)
26
FE Review-Sturctural Design
3. A reinforced concrete tied column is subjected to a
design a..xiaI compression force of 1090 kips that is con-
centrically applied. Slenderness effects are negligible, P ::o- Io ~ 0 11..- 1 f ..S
and the column is to be designed using ACI ~H8. Given
a specified compressive strength of 5000 psi, grade 69
rebars, and a specified longitudinal steel ratio of 0.02,
what is most nearly the width of the sides of the smallest
square column that will support the load?
(A) 12 in
/2 :::- C),OL..
(B) 16 in
~ (C) 20in
(D) 24 in /dS-.J .,,.._;; J-y .:- bDl.'c.)C) /;;,> I
lJ U>~P
0 E,.
0 Cl
L., /
27
FE Review-Sturctural Design
(H) 0.061
P!i l S-'-1
(C) 0.092
(D) 0.11
r51r'-l
28
FE Review-Sturctural Design
5. An 18 in square tied colun1n is reinforced with
12 no. 9 grade 60 bars and has a concrete co1npressive CJ t.A oc, C,.) 1"3 A 'l _s
strength oL4000 lbf/hi. The colu1nn, which is braced
against sidesv1ay, has an unsupported height of 9 ft and j Y = 1.::,,o 0 0 0 P 5, 1
supports axial load only without end n1ornents. ,i\,That is d~-= ½o~o P>1
most nearly the design axial load capacity?
- ? (A) 930 kips
0 C o O
(B) 97Okips
(C) 1800 kips IL~) 0
29
FE Review-Sturctural Design
6. The short spiral column shown uses eight no. 8
bars. Assume. the loading has a low eccentricity. J-Jt..rr ,...J R~"F f-'\A_J
f~ = 3500 lbf/in2 , and fv = 40,000 1bf/in2 •
30
FE Review-Sturctural Design
1. A 25 ft long steef beamis loaded upifotinly {live) at f'LAs-r,e- >n,10..J .1-'lar>vl.\J-> { C:. }r )
4 kips /ft ...Loadir1g • du~ .t9 •self-v.r~ight ••ii? •• riegligibfo, •• an<i •.. ~ Cll'L W ,, - ~ H-Aj?i:"
there .is ·adeq_ua,teJat~raI.·Support provided to the.peaxn'. • •
The requited plastic •sectio:r:t .rtidduhj_s ·for •a•. \¥12 . shape • ·
.. (, il.t>.\X:: .5e> ,'. it = ~0(.)0 D )> ~ I
.using gra,ae'."50steetis mo~tn.early · ·· · ·
.... . .•.:.. .• "i •.• . •. :::>::.. ... :_ :·: .· ··_:: .:::::::::: :·:...
. , .. , . .... .. . . .... .
.. . .
(A)60iU . .•.·..
(B) 95 3 . in
.) . • ;:r ·.
. •( G 110 m
--:, (D) 120i1?
·1·- · .· ......... ... ... .. ~ - " >- )-..
L/L I
I I.
yS I t7
5'0 ---
1'1()
· I
z;c
/ 0 z_.
31
FE Review-Sturctural Design
(A) 2-0 in
(B) 3.0 in
(C) 4.0in
(D) 5.0in
32
FE Review-Sturctural Design
. . ·. ' . . ·., . ··.· · ·· · ·:::::. : :: : : .. :: : :·: :::: ·::: : . . .
1_ _------
_.... ,/ y
O.) . ...___
33
FE Review-Sturctural Design
l
\
\
'l
/ I
34
FE Review-Sturctural Design
r = ,o7 10 '-1
. .. .. . . . ..
. . . . . :.·:· . ..· : -·· . .
.. . .. .. ....... . ·····
.. ... .......
. . . .. ..
..
,
•·'
, , ..... . . . . .
(A)Jocal
(B} torsional ·
(C} inelastic
(D) ·elastic
35
FE Review-Sturctural Design
.... . .. . .
.. . . .......
....... .. ..
,
lJ ,;)..\t..- t I •;>le/')<
IC.t..
- -..:::-
( 2.. l'D) ( <tJ-e) ( I ~
r - I 31.1
I , ;>3 i'v'\
-·
/l. (..
,-
CA-LCU L _ ,tc?'
I lJ. "'
(_1sL\ ) 1-
36
FE Review-Sturctural Design
)l.::- 2, I
A =
P~ ID
P5 I b ~
37
FE Review-Sturctural Design . . ..... , ,. .. . . .....
U=I
38
FE Review-Sturctural Design
(B) 2.2 in 2
(C) 2.5 in 2
(DJ___2. 7 in2
39
FE Review-Sturctural Design
(A) 12 in2
--) (B) 17 iri2 F; = .:S "' IC s (
27 . .2 t= C/ z._ ~ l /('~
(D) . · Ill l..
I) - 0 I°'
~ = </;-r; - ¢:J- Fe Ae
-r:- - l>-1 Fv uA~
A IA. ::- I /, I b /~
40
FE Review-Sturctural Design
.. .. . . . . . . .. ... ..... . .
- ..... .. ... . ,
-1x 1~ <·
.. .. . .... L = (7-J(3 IY1) = b ,V\_
... .· I >
.. ... ... :··.:· ..
· n· ·
.
,
..·.·.· ·.·.····.·· ' .· ...·· .
.. . . . .. . . ..
· .. ···
.. .
. . . . . .. . . . ..
.
.. '''
' '
.
.
.. .... . .
. .. ...
.... .. . ...
. L4><4.X3/8 .
(A) . 0.
(B)
.
-=z.(C) 0;8L : I"'--
(D) 0,86 .
41
FE Review-Sturctural Design
42
FE Review-Sturctural Design
[[ L
43
FE Review-Sturctural Design
1. The connection shown consists of 11 grade A307
7/8 in diameter bolts. Bolt hole sizes are standard. The
ultimate strength of the connected n1ember is 58 ksi.
The connected me1nber is 0.5 in thick. The edge clear
distance is 2.5 in, and the cent-er-t-0-center spacing of the
holes is 3 in. · ··
l~ l~I3•in.,l
= = =i
44
FE Review-Sturctural Design
45
FE Review-Sturctural Design
r, 1(o a
46
FE Review-Sturctural Design
\7 f-t
~S11~;;ij;if/----- - - -----------~,.-..,---
A Wl8 x 65 Grade 50 beam has an unbraced segment length of Lb= 64 with Cb
= 1.0. The design flexural strength of the segment is most nearly:
a). 297 kip-ft
b). 394 kip-ft ~
pj \ s-,
•
0
0 ~ Mtt = q>M~ - ~ GFC_Lb - Lr)~ l/C,~ -(lq,q k.·vi~J( JJk - ~<i, J..")
. i
47
FE Review-Sturctural Design
A W12 x 50 Grade 50 column has a length of 9 feet and is pinned at each end
and braced at third points about the minor axi: . The maximum available design
strength in compression of the column is most nearly:
a) . 520 kips
b). 560 kips
c). 600 kips
d) . 640 kips
I 6 l.. '!:.:,A'/.'.?
~ -: (I) l c; J..,_) ( ~ ) =
'!;;, I g ,·.._
P't N
-- -
\( ·L..
f'y
-
' e, b /~
I~- s '7
e,J
7/ / I I
48
FE Review-Sturctural Design
Figure 14.12 shows a bolted connection with -.ro 3 x 3 x % inch angles bolted
to a ¾-inch gusset plate with four ¾-inch Q!..ameter bolts in standard boles.
All components are Grade 36 steel and the ~ss area of the double angles is
A = 4.22 in. 2 Assuming that bolt strength and bkk shear do not govern, the design
te~sile strength of the double angles is most ne:-ly:
I "J .
a). 105 kips CA 13 :::-'1 1"'-
b). 115 kips
F°y ~ '> (.. le. S. ( I °F:, .:- -s;:'/f' j.._ .SI
_-,-., c). 125 kips
.. . El}···l -2'5-lfi-p-s
JI, J :. . . Lf, 2. l.. ;VI
• I • •
2..' ,:' t.''
A,J -
'-/ 15"Lp
l's b. )
49
FE Review-Sturctural Design
· :,:.:i:'JI{t~'.:1:~i:~'#/:··,.1-r-- Areinforced
- ~ -concrete
- -beam,
- -with-an-overall
- -depth
- of-16-inches,
- -an - ---
effective depth
of 14 inches, and a width of 12 inches, is reinforced with Grade 60 bars and has a
concrete cylinder strength of 3000 pounds per square inch. Determine the area of
tension reinforcement required for the beam to support a superimposed Hve 1oad of
one kip per foot run over an effective span of 20 f et: t.
I 1 ' I
LJ \2. ti<)')~ (, 0
(_JL
w . . ::-1~
y
-x: '------=---=-------i
I '--/1-
0 / A=~·~-~ ~
I ~f-;-fll~
,,,_,,.c'------'7'7/
1'2.. ;,A
~ =- I SLJ ~
&-t},
·. C... ~ As iv /_
o .ds..J'"' b
50