You are on page 1of 9

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I-III

Name of Employee: DONNA T. DUASO Name of Rater: MARIA ELENA F. MORALES, ED.D
Position: SECONDARY SCHOOL TEACHER 1 Position: SCHOOL HEAD
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Date of Review: May-20
Rating Period: 2019-2020
TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic 1. Content 1. Applied Quality No acceptable 4 3 4 3.667 0.275
Education Knowledge and knowledge of evidence was shown
Services Pedagogy content within and Showed knowledge Showed knowledge Showed knowledge Showed knowledge Showed knowledge
across curriculum of content and its of content and its of content and its of content and its of content and its
teaching areas. integration within integration within integration within integration within integration within
and across subject and across subject and across subject and across subject and across subject
areas as shown in areas as shown in areas as shown in areas as shown in areas as shown in
MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a
7.5%
of 7 of 6 of 5 of 4 rating of 7
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 of No acceptable
lessons using MOV lessons using MOV lessons using MOV the given MOV evidence was shown
1 and supported by 1 and supported by 1 and supported by
any 1 of the other any 1 of the other any 1 of the other
given MOV given MOV given MOV
Timeliness
Basic 2. Used a range of Quality Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using No acceptable Facilitated using 4 4 4 4.000 0.3
Education teaching strategies different teaching different teaching different teaching different teaching evidence was shown different teaching
Services that enhance strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that
learner promote reading promote reading promote reading promote reading promote reading
schievement in writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or
literacy and numeracy skills as numeracy skills as numeracy skills as numeracy skills as numeracy skills as
numeracy skills shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4 with a rating of 6

7.5% Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable


learner-centered learner-centered learner-centered learner-centered evidence was shown
lessons as evidently lessons as evidently lessons as evidently lessons as evidently
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in any of the
and supported by and supported by and supported by other given MOV
any 1 of the other any 1 of the other any 1 of the other
MOV given MOV given MOV given

Timeliness
Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic 1. Content 3. Applied a range Quality Used different Used different Used different Used different No acceptable Used different 4 4 4 4.000 0.300
Education Knowledge and of teaching teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies evidence was shown teaching strategies
Services Pedagogy strategies to that develop critical that develop critical that develop critical that develop critical that develop critical
develop critical and and creative and creative and creative and creative and creative
creative thinking, thinking skills and/or thinking skills and/or thinking skills and/or thinking skills and/or thinking skills
as well as other other HOTS as other HOTS as other HOTS as other HOTS as and/or other HOTS
higher order shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1
thinking skills. with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4 with a rating of 6
7.5%
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable
lessons as lessons as lessons as as evidenced by evidence was shown
evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV any of the other
1 and supported by 1 and supported by 1 and supported by given MOV
any 1 of the other any 1 of the other any 1 of the other
given MOV given MOV given MOV
Timeliness
Basic 2. Learning 4. Managed Quality No acceptable 4 4 4 4.000 0.3
Education Environment and classroom structure Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom evidence was shown Used classroom
Services Diversity of to engage learners, management management management management management
Learners individually or in strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that
groups, in engage learners in engage learners in engage learners in engage learners in engage learners in
activities/tasks as activities/tasks as activities/tasks as activities/tasks as activities/tasks as
meanigful
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
exploration,
discovery and 7.5% with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4 with a rating of 6
hands-on activities Efficiency Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable
Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2
within a range of lessons supported lessons supported lessons supported supported by any of evidence was shown
physical learning the acceptable
by MOV 1 and any by MOV 1 and any by MOV 1 and any
environments. MOV
1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness
Basic 5. Managed learner Quality Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher No acceptable Applied teacher 4 4 4 4.000 0.300
Education behavior management management management management evidence was shown management
Services constructively by strategies of learner strategies of learner strategies of learner strategies of learner strategies of
applying positive behavior that behavior that behavior that behavior that learner behavior
and non-violent promote positive promote positive promote positive promote positive that promote
discipline to and non-violent and non-violent and non-violent and non-violent positive and non-
ensure learning- discipline as shown discipline as shown discipline as shown discipline as shown violent discipline as
focused in MOV submitted in MOV submitted in MOV submitted in MOV submitted shown in MOV
environment with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4 submitted with a
7.5% rating of 6

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 4 Submitted any 1 of No acceptable
of the given of the given of the given the given strategies evidence was shown
strategies as strategies as strategies as as observed in only
observed in at least observed in 3 observed in 2 1 lesson
4 lessons lessons lessons
Timeliness
Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic 2. Learning 6. Used Quality Applied Applied Applied No acceptable 4 4 4 4.000 0.3
Applied Applied
Education Environment and differentiated, differentiated differentiated differentiated evidence was shown
Services Diversity of developmentally teaching strategies differentiated teaching strategies teaching strategies differentiated
Learners appropriate to address learner teaching strategies to address learner to address learner teaching strategies
learning diversity as shown to address learner diversity as shown diversity as shown to address learner
diversity as shown diversity as shown
experiences to in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a
in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a
address learners’ rating of 7 rating of 5 rating of 4
gender, needs, rating of 6 rating of 6
strengths, interests Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 No acceptable
and experiences. differentiated differentiated differentiated differentiated evidence was shown
7.5% teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategy in
in at least 2 in at least 2 in 2 lessons as only 1 lesson as
lessons as lessons as evidenced by MOV evidently shown in
evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV 1 and supported by any 1 of the
1 and supported by 1 and supported by any 1 of the other acceptable MOV
any 1 of the other any 1 of the other acceptable MOV
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Timeliness
Basic 3. Curriculum 7. Planned, Quality Planned and Planned and Planned and Planned and No acceptable Planned and 4 4 4 4.000 0.3
Education and Planning managed and implemented implemented implemented implemented evidence was shown implemented
Services implemented developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally
developmentally sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced
sequenced and learning and learning and learning and learning teaching and
teaching and process as shown process as shown process as shown process as shown learning process as
learning processes in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1
to meet curriculum rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4 with a rating of 6
requirements and
varied teaching Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable
contexts. 7.5% developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally evidence was shown
sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced teaching
and learning and learning and learning and learning
process as process as process as process as
evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and any 1 of the given
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1 MOV
of the other given of the other given of the other given
MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness

Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic 3. Curriculum 8. Participated in Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely participated No acceptable Frequently 4 4 4 4.000 0.3
Education and Planning collegial participated in participated in participated in in LAC/FGD/ evidence was shown participated in
Services discussions that LACs/FGDs/meetin LACs/FGDs/meetin LACs/FGDs/ meeting to discuss LACs/FGDs/meetin
use teacher and gs to discuss gs to discuss meetings to discuss teacher/learner gs to discuss
learner feedback to teacher/learner teacher/learner teacher/learner feedback to enrich teacher/learner
enrich teaching feedback to enrich feedback to enrich feedback to enrich instruction as feedback to enrich
practice. instruction as instruction as instruction as shown in the MOV instruction as
shown in the MOV shown in the MOV shown in the MOV submitted shown in the MOV
7.5% submitted submitted submitted submitted

Efficiency Participated in at Participated in 3 Participated in 2 Participated in 1 No acceptable


least 4 LACs/FGDs/meetin LACs/FGDs/meetin LAC/FGD/meeting evidence was shown
LACs/FGDs/meetin gs as evidently gs as evidently as evidently shown
gs as evidently shown in any 1 of shown in any 1 of in any 1 of the given
shown in any 1 of the given MOV the given MOV MOV
the given MOV
Timeliness
Basic 9. Selected, Quality Developed and Developed and Developed and Developed and No acceptable Developed and 4 4 4 4.000 0.3
Education developed, used varied used varied used varied used varied evidence was shown used varied
Services organized and used teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and
appropriate learning resources, learning resources, learning resources, learning resources, learning resources,
teaching and including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to
learning resources, address learning address learning address learning address learning address learning
including ICT, to goals as shown in goals as shown in goals as shown in goals as shown in goals as shown in
address learning MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a
goals. of 7 of 6 of 5 of 4 rating of 6

Efficiency Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied Submitted any No acceptable


7.5%
teaching and teaching and teaching and evidence was shown
Submitted at least 4 learning resources, learning resources, learning resource,
varied teaching and including ICT, as including ICT, as including ICT, as
learning resources, evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in
including ICT, as MOV 1 and MOV 1 and any of the
evidently shown in supported by any 1 supported by any 1 acceptable MOV
MOV 1 and of the acceptable of the acceptable
supported by any 1 MOV MOV
of the acceptable
MOV
Timeliness
Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic 4. Assessment 10. Designed, Quality Designed, selected, Designed, selected, Designed, selected, Designed, selected, No acceptable Designed, 4 4 4 4 0.3
Education and Reporting selected, organized organized and used organized and used organized and used organized and used evidence was shown selected, organized
Services and used diagnostic, diagnostic, diagnostic, diagnostic, and used
diagnostic, formative and formative and formative and formative and diagnostic,
formative and summative summative summative summative formative and
summative assessment assessment assessment assessment summative
assessment strategies strategies strategies strategies assessment
strategies consistent with consistent with consistent with consistent with strategies
consistent with curriculum curriculum curriculum curriculum consistent with
curriculum requirements as requirements as requirements as requirements as curriculum
requirements. shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 requirements as
7.5%
with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 6

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied Submitted 1 No acceptable


varied assessment assessment tools assessment tools assessment tool as evidence was shown
tools as evidently as evidently shown as evidently shown evidently shown in
shown in any 1 of in any 1 of the in any 1 of the any of the
the acceptable acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
MOV
Timeliness
Basic 11. Monitored and Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely monitored No acceptable Frequently 4 4 4 4.000 0.300
Education evaluated learner monitored and monitored and monitored and and evaluated evidence was shown monitored and
Services progress and evaluated learner evaluated learner evaluated learner learner progress evaluated learner
achievement using progress and progress and progress and and achievement progress and
learner attainment achievement using achievement using achievement using using learner achievement using
data. learner attainment learner attainment learner attainment attainment data as learner attainment
data as shown in data as shown in data as shown in shown in the MOV data as shown in
the MOV submitted the MOV submitted the MOV submitted submitted the MOV submitted
7.5%
Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted 1 No acceptable
combination of at combination of 3 of combination of 2 of acceptable MOV evidence was shown
least 4 of the the acceptable the acceptable
acceptable MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV No acceptable
were distributed were distributed were distributed was completed in evidence was shown
across 4 quarters across 3 quarters across 2 quarters only 1 quarter
Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic 4. Assessment 12.Communica ted Quality Consistently Frequently showed Occasionally Rarely showed No acceptable Frequently showed 4 4 4 4 0.3
prompt and clear
Education and Reporting promptly and showed prompt and prompt and clear showed prompt and prompt and clear evidence was shown
communication of the
Services clearly the learners’ clear communication of clear communication of learners’ needs,
needs, progress communication of the learners’ needs, communication of the learners’ needs, progress and
and achievement to the learners’ needs, progress and the learners’ needs, progress and achievement to key
stakeholders, including
key stakeholders, progress and achievement to key progress and achievement to key parents/ guardians as
including parents/ achievement to key stakeholders, achievement to key stakeholders, shown in the MOV
guardians. stakeholders, including parents/ stakeholders, including parents/ submitted
including parents/ guardians as shown including parents/ guardians as shown
guardians as shown in the MOV guardians as shown in the MOV
7.5% in the MOV submitted in the MOV submitted
submitted submitted

Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted any 1 of No acceptable


combination of at combination of 3 of combination of 2 of the given MOV evidence was shown
least 4 of the the acceptable the acceptable
acceptable MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV No acceptable
were distributed were distributed were distributed was completed in evidence was shown
across 4 quarters across 3 quarters across 2 quarters only 1 quarter
Basic 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely performed No acceptable Frequently 4 4 4.000 0.400
Education various related performed various performed various performed various various related evidence was shown performed various
Services works/activities that related related related work/activities that related
contribute to the work/activities that work/activities that work/activities that contribute to the work/activities that
teaching-learning contribute to the contribute to the contribute to the teaching learning contribute to the
process. teaching learning teaching learning teaching learning process as shown teaching learning
process as shown process as shown process as shown in the MOV process as shown
10% in the MOV in the MOV in the MOV submitted in the MOV
submitted submitted submitted submitted

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 of No acceptable


different kinds of different kinds of different kinds of the acceptable evidence was shown
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV MOV
Timeliness 4
RATING FOR OVER-ALL
Very Satisfactory 3.975
ACCOMPLISHMENTS

ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCIES


RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500-5.000 Outstanding
3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory DONNA T. DUASO MARIA . ELENA F. MORALES , Ed.D
below 1.499 Poor Ratee Rater/ Approving Authority
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) SUMMARY SHEET
Teacher I-III (Proficient Teacher)

Name of Employee: JENEFER B. ACQUIATAN Name of Rater: MA. ELENA F. MORALES ,ED.D
Position: SECONDARY SCHOOL TEACHER -1 Position: SCHOOL HEAD
Bureau/Center/Service/Division SURIGAO DEL SUR Date of Review: May-20
Rating Period: 2019-2020

Weight per Weight per Numerical Ratings


KRA Objectives Score
KRA Objective Q E T Ave
Objective 1 7.5% 4 3 4 3.667 0.275
KRA 1 22.5% Objective 2 7.5% 4 4 4 4.000 0.300
Objective 3 7.5% 4 4 4 4.000 0.300
Objective 4 7.5% 4 4 4 4.000 0.300
KRA 2 22.5% Objective 5 7.5% 4 4 4 4.000 0.300
Objective 6 7.5% 4 4 4 4.000 0.300
Objective 7 7.5% 4 4 4 4.000 0.300
KRA 3 22.5% Objective 8 7.5% 4 4 4 4.000 0.300
Objective 9 7.5% 4 4 4 4.000 0.300
Objective 1 7.5% 4 4 4 4.000 0.300
KRA 4 22.5% Objective 1 7.5% 4 4 4 4.000 0.300
Objective 1 7.5% 4 4 4 4.000 0.300
Plus Factor 10% Objective 1 10% 4 4 4 4.000 0.400
Final Rating Very Satisfactory
Adjectival Rating 3.975

JENEFER B. ACQUIATAN MARIA ELENA F. MORALES , Ed.D


Ratee Rater/Approving Authority
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Master Teacher I-IV

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:


Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Date of Review:
Rating Period:

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 1. Content 1. Modeled effective Quality No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Services Knowledge and applications of content Modeled effective Modeled effective Modeled effective Modeled effective evidence was
Pedagogy knowledge within and applications of applications of applications of applications of shown
across curriculum content knowledge content knowledge content knowledge content knowledge
teaching areas. within and across within and across within and across within and across
curriculum teaching curriculum teaching curriculum teaching curriculum teaching
areas as shown in areas as shown in areas as shown in areas as shown in
MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating
of 8 of 7 of 6 of 5
7.5%
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable
lessons as lessons as lessons as as evidenced by evidence was
evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV MOV 1 from shown
1 and supported by 1 from colleagues 1 from colleagues colleagues and
any 1 of the other and supported by and supported by supported by any 1
MOV given any 1 of the other any 1 of the other of the other MOV
MOV given MOV given given
Timeliness
Basic Education 2. Collaborated with Quality Conducted, Conducted and Conducted action Proposedaction No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Services colleagues in the completed and completed action research with research with evidence was
conduct and application disseminated action research with colleagues colleagues shown
of research to enrich research with colleagues
knowledge of content colleagues
and pedagogy.
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted any 3 of Submitted any 2 Submitted any 1 No acceptable
7.5%
of the given MOV the acceptable MOV MOV evidence was
MOV shown
Timeliness Presented the Completed the Conducted the Proposed the No acceptable
research report research report research report research report evidence was
within the rating within the rating within the rating within the rating shown
period period period period
Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 1. Content 3. Developed and Quality Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Services Knowledge and applied effective effective teaching effective teaching effective teaching effective teaching evidence was
Pedagogy teaching strategies to strategies to strategies to strategies to strategies to shown
promote critical and promote critical and promote critical and promote critical and promote critical and
creative thinking, as well creative thinking, as creative thinking, as creative thinking, as creative thinking, as
as other higher-order well as other higher- well as other higher- well as other higher- well as other higher-
thinking skills. order thinking skills order thinking skills order thinking skills order thinking skills
as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 8 with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5
7.5%
Efficiency Submitted 4 or Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable
more lessons as lessons as evidently lessons as evidently as evidently shown evidence was
evidently shown in shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 in MOV 1 and shown
MOV 1 and and supported by and supported by supported by any of
supported by any 1 any 1 of the other any 1 of the other the other MOV
of the other MOV MOV given MOV given given
given
Timeliness
Basic Education 2. Learning 4. Worked with Quality No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Services Environment and colleagues to model and Modeled and Modeled and Modeled and
Modeled and evidence was
Diversity of share effective shared effective shared effective shared effective
shared effective shown
Learners techniques in the classroom classroom classroomclassroom
management of management management management
management
classroom structure to strategies that strategies that strategies that
strategies that
engage learners, engage learners in engage learners in engage learners in
engage learners in
individually or in groups, activities/ tasks activities/ tasks activities/ tasks
activities/ tasks
in meaningful done in different done in different done in different
done in different
exploration, discovery physical learning physical learning physical learning
physical learning
7.5%
and hands-on activities environments as environments as environments as
environments as
within a range of shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
shown in MOV 1
physical learning with a rating of 8 with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6
with a rating of 5
environments.environme Efficiency Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable
nts. Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2
supported by any of evidence was
lessons supported lessons supported lessons supported
the acceptable shown
by MOV 1 and any by MOV 1 and any by MOV 1 and any
MOV
1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness
Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 2. Learning 5. Exhibited effective Quality Exhibited effective Exhibited effective Exhibited effective Exhibited effective No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Services Environment and and constructive and constructive and constructive and constructive and constructive evidence was
Diversity of behavior management behavior behavior behavior behavior shown
Learners skills by applying management skills management skills management skills management skills
positive and non-violent by applying positive by applying positive by applying positive by applying positive
discipline to ensure and non-violent and non-violent and non-violent and non-violent
learning-focused discipline to ensure discipline to ensure discipline to ensure discipline to ensure
environments. learning-focused learning-focused learning-focused learning-focused
environments environments environments environments
7.5% shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 8 with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5

Efficiency Applied at least 7 of Applied at least 7 of Applied at least 7 of Applied any of the No acceptable
the given strategies the given strategies the given strategies given strategies as evidence was
as observed in at as observed in 3 as observed in 2 observed in only 1 shown
least 4 lessons lessons lessons lesson
Timeliness
Basic Education 6. Worked with Quality Worked with Worked with Worked with Worked with No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Services colleagues to share colleagues at least colleagues in the colleagues but no colleagues but no evidence was
differentiated, in the department or evidence of sharing evidence of sharing shown
developmentally district/cluster level grade level to share with others with others
appropriate to share lesson lesson
opportunities to address
Efficiency Submitted at least 1 Submitted at least 1 Submitted at least 1 Submitted at least 1 No acceptable
learners’ differences in 7.5%
lesson as evidently lesson as evidently lesson as evidently lesson, as evidence was
gender, needs,
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 evidenced by either shown
strengths, interests and
and supported by and supported by and supported by MOV 2 or 3 but no
experiences.
any acceptable any acceptable any acceptable evidence of sharing
MOV MOV MOV with others
Timeliness
Basic Education 3. Curriculum and 7. Developed and Quality Developed and Developed and Developed and Developed and No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Services Planning applied effective applied effective applied effective applied effective applied effective evidence was
strategies in the strategies showing strategies showing strategies showing strategies showing shown
planning and developmentally- developmentally- developmentally- developmentally-
management of sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced teaching
developmentally and learning and learning and learning and learning
sequenced teaching and process as shown process as shown process as shown process as shown
learning processes to in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a
meet curriculum rating of 8 rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5
requirements and varied 7.5%
teaching contexts. Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 2-3 Submitted 1 lesson Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable
lessons as lessons as as evidenced by as evidenced by evidence was
evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV shown in MOV 1 any 1 of the shown
1 and 2 and 1 and 2 and and/or 2 and acceptable MOV
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1
of the other of the other of the other
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness
Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 3. Curriculum and 8. Reviewed with Quality Consistently Frequently led Occasionally led Rarely led No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Services Planning colleagues, teacher and participated in collaborative collaborative collaborative evidence was
learner feedback to plan, LACs/FGDs/meetin reviews of teacher reviews of teacher reviews of teacher shown
facilitate and enrich gs to discuss and learner and learner and learner
teaching practice. teacher/learner feedback as feedback as feedback as
feedback to enrich evidenced by the evidenced by the evidenced by the
instruction as MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
shown in the MOV
submitted

7.5% Efficiency Submitted 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable


collaborative collaborative collaborative collaborative review evidence was
reviews of teacher reviews of teacher reviews of teacher of teacher and shown
and learner and learner and learner learner feedback as
feedback as feedback as feedback as evidently shown in
evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in any of the
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and acceptable MOV
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1
of the acceptable of the acceptable of the acceptable
MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness
Basic Education 9. Advised and guided Quality Consistently Frequently advised Occasionally Rarely advised No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Services colleagues in the advised colleagues colleagues in the advised colleagues colleagues in the evidence was
selection, organization, in the selection, selection, in the selection, selection, shown
development and use of organization, organization, organization, organization,
appropriate teaching development and development and development and development and
and learning resources, appropriate use of appropriate use of appropriate use of appropriate use of
including ICT, to teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and
address specific learning learning resources learning resources learning resources learning resources
goals. as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the
7.5% MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable


teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and evidence was
learning resources learning resources learning resources learning resource shown
as evidenced by at as evidenced by at as evidenced by at as evidenced by
least 1 of the least 1 of the least 1 of the any of the
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 4. Assessment 10. Worked Quality Consistently Frequently reviewed Occasionally Rarely reviewed No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Services and Reporting collaboratively with reviewed collaboratively reviewed collaboratively evidence was
colleagues to review the collaboratively assessment tools collaboratively assessment tools shown
design, selection, assessment tools with colleagues as assessment tools with colleagues as
organization and use of with colleagues as shown in the MOV with colleagues as shown in the MOV
a range of effective shown in the MOV submitted shown in the MOV submitted
diagnostic, formative submitted submitted
and summative
assessment strategies Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable
consistent with 7.5% assessment tools assessment tools assessment tools assessment tool as evidence was
curriculum requirements. as evidently shown as evidently shown as evidently shown evidently shown in shown
in any of the in any of the in any of the any of the
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
consistent with 7.5% assessment tools assessment tools assessment tools assessment tool as evidence was
curriculum requirements. as evidently shown as evidently shown as evidently shown evidently shown in shown
in any of the in any of the in any of the any of the
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Timeliness
Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 4. Assessment 11. Interpreted Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely collaborated No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Services and Reporting collaboratively collaborated with collaborated with collaborated with with colleagues in evidence was
monitoring and colleagues in the colleagues in the colleagues in the the interpretation of shown
evaluation strategies of interpretation of interpretation of interpretation of assessment data as
attainment data to assessment data as assessment data as assessment data as shown in the MOV
support learner progress shown in the MOV shown in the MOV shown in the MOV submitted
7.5%
and achievement. submitted submitted submitted
Efficiency Submitted at least 2 Submitted at least 3 Submitted at least 2 Submitted any 1 of No acceptable
different types of of the same kind of of the same kind of the MOV evidence was
MOV MOV MOV shown
Timeliness
Basic Education 12. Applied skills in the Quality Consistently applied Frequently applied Occasionally Rarely applied skills No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Services effective communication skills in the effective skills in the effective applied skills in the in the effective evidence was
of learner needs, communication of communication of effective communication of shown
progress and learner needs and learner needs and communication of learner needs and
achievement to key progress to parents/ progress to parents/ learner needs and progress to parents/
stakeholders, including guardians as shown guardians as shown progress to parents/ guardians as shown
parents/guardians. in the MOV in the MOV guardians as shown in the MOV
7.5% submitted submitted in the MOV submitted
submitted

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted any 3 Submitted any 2 Submitted any 1


of the acceptable MOV MOV MOV
MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed various Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely performed No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Services related works/activities performed special performed special performed special special tasks and/or evidence was
that contribute to the tasks and/or tasks and/or tasks and/or assignments as shown
teaching-learning assignments as assignments as assignments as shown in the MOV
process. shown in the MOV shown in the MOV shown in the MOV submitted
10% submitted submitted submitted
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted only 3 Submitted only 2 Submitted any 1 of No acceptable
different kinds of different kinds of different kinds of the acceptable evidence was
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV MOV shown
Timeliness
RATING FOR OVER-ALL
#DIV/0! #DIV/0!
ACCOMPLISHMENTS

ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCIES


RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500-5.000 Outstanding
3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory NAME OF THE TEACHER NAME OF THE RATER NAME OF THE APPROVING AUTHORITY
below 1.499 Poor Ratee Rater Approving Authority
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM (I
Master Teacher I-IV (Highly Proficient Teach

Name of Employee:
Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:
Rating Period:

Weight per Weight per Numeri


KRA Objectives
KRA Objective
Q
Objective 1 7.5% 0
KRA 1 22.5% Objective 2 7.5% 0
Objective 3 7.5% 0
Objective 4 7.5% 0
KRA 2 22.5% Objective 5 7.5% 0
Objective 6 7.5% 0
Objective 7 7.5% 0
KRA 3 22.5% Objective 8 7.5% 0
Objective 9 7.5% 0
Objective 10 7.5% 0
KRA 4 22.5% Objective 11 7.5% 0
Objective 12 7.5% 0
Plus Factor 10% Objective 13 10% 0

NAME OF THE RATEE NAME OF RATER


Ratee Rater
EVIEW FORM (IPCRF) SUMMARY SHEET
y Proficient Teacher)

Name of Rater:
Position:
Date of Review:

Numerical Ratings
Score
E T Ave
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Final Rating #DIV/0!
Adjectival Rating #DIV/0!

NAME OF RATER NAME OF APPROVING AUTHORITY


Rater Approving Authority

You might also like