Professional Documents
Culture Documents
3.02.2021
CANER ÇAKMAK
FATMANUR KOYUNCU
MERVE SÖZEN
YUSUF EMEK
CONTENT
Part 4. References
Part 1. THE DESCRIPTION OF DESIGN
The Department of Architecture at IZTECH is designed as an educational building at Urla,İzmir. There is no dominant noise
source around the building.
The study focuses on analysis of visual performance, lighting design and acoustic comfort and design for architectural
studios. It analyzed several important design issues that have significant impact on visual quality, including space size and
depth to height ratio, windows orientation, lighting direction and desk position. Dimensions of the studio are 17.00 m by
12.00 m with a height of 3.80 m.
The brief was to work with an existing educational organization to create a classroom design that would best serve their
needs into the next century.
Additionally, the Window Wall also allows the students to regulate their own immediate physical environment, fine tuning
the light, air, and acoustics of their space in order make the most of their connection to these other, larger systems.
The new Window Wall system fits into the existing opening, a section through the system shows the components:
1.a Decision of material, size and placement of windows , doors and surfaces
Window direction
Natural daylight coming from the northern windows does not create shade in the classroom; Accordingly, it is
recommended for illuminating classrooms and other teaching areas because it consists mainly of indirect emitted light from
the sky. In the north orientation, direct sun can be experienced for very short periods in the early morning or late afternoon
in the middle of summer when schools are closed. Therefore, openings were created on the north facade.
Lighting direction
Another important issue that has an effect on the visual performance of the student is the direction of lighting in the
classroom according to the position of the desk. For the design of the school building, the suitability of the lighting for the
purpose of the studio is based on by embedding the lighting in the suspended ceiling.
Table positions
The position of the student desk in the classroom has a great impact on the visual comfort of the student. Each student
position has a different field of view, which is a function of the viewer's perspective and focus of attention. The contrasting
luminosities in the field of view should be comfortable and help improve visual performance. It is desirable to make the
visual task the brightest object in the field of view.
1.b Floor plan, ceiling plan, and four sections
1.c 3D views
Part 2. LIGHTING
First we determined Room Cavity Ratio . When finding room cavity ratio, we need to know room cavity height, width and
length of the studio. While finding room cavity height, we subtract luminaire height from -workplane height .Work plane
hight is equal to desk high, and desk heigth is 80 cm.
Step 1:
5 h RC (L+ W )
RCR=
LW
Ceiling height=0,2
hRC =2.8 m
5 x 2,8(17 m+12 m)
= 406 / 204 = 1,99 approx. 2
17 m x 12 m
Step 2:
5 h cc( L+W )
Ceiling Cavity Ratio =
LW
5 h fc( L+W )
Floor Cavity Ratio =
LW
Step 4: Then, CU value can be determined from CU table for first luminare and second luminare.
Pcc is 0,7 and wall reflectance is 0,5. Light loss factor is 0,8 and room cavity ratio is determined almost 2. CU value of first
luminare is 0,59. CU value of second luminare is 0,62 (TABLE H) .
CU= 59 From table H
a=38,8009738 approx. 39
Luminaire 1 60,0282248 61
Luminaire 2 38,8009738 39
LUMINAIRE CALCULATION
The result from the formula for 1. luminaire is 60,03, so we assumed it 61.
According to the Candle Power Diagram, the emission amount of the 2nd luminaire is lower. It is more appropriate to use
the one with the high amount of diffusion in the classroom. As a result, the number of lamps used for the classroom is 39.
Acoustics: The basic requirements of acoustic comfort for architectural studios can be listed as; to ensure background
noise level at optimum limits, to provide speech intelligibility, to prevent rain noise and other acoustical problems. Impact
sound insulation is controlled by floor finishes. absorbent liner absorbent panels to the walls
3.a A short description of how you selected the optimal reverberation time
The reverbration time of a classrooms varies according to the volume of that area. As the volume increases, the optimal
reverberation time increases.
‘’The standards are quite simple in their criteria, requiring a reverberation time of not more than 0.6 seconds at the mid-
speech frequencies of 250, 500, and 1,000 Hertz in typical classrooms up to 10,000 cubic feet and 0.7 seconds for classrooms
up to 20,000 cubic feet.’’
According to ANSI Standard S12.60, the optimal reverbration time value of classrooms around 20,000 ft 3 (566 m3) should be
0.7 seconds. Therefore, we accepted the optimal revebration time in the studio as 0.7 seconds. Considering the acceptable
values of ± 10%, we came to the conclusion that the revebration time should be between 0.77 seconds maximum and 0.63
seconds minimum.
0,7
Optimal Revebration Time (sec) 0,70 0,70 0,70
0
0,7
Maximum Revebration Time(+10%) 0,77 0,77 0,77
7
0,6
Minimum Revebration Time(-10%) 0,63 0,63 0,63
3
3.b Table of selected materials listing absorption coefficients used for calculation
We have found their absorption coefficients by selecting acoustically suitable and usable materials from various sources.
MATERIALS COEFFICIENTS(α)
0,0
Tile 0,015 0,02 0,02
1
0,3
Floor areas with Drawing Tables and chairs (occupied) 0,40 0,50 0,50
0
0,2
Floor areas with Drawing Tables and chairs (empty) 0,10 0,10 0,20
0
0,2
Plaster Decorative Panels 0,18 0,15 0,15
2
0,0
Plaster 0,03 0,04 0,05
3
0,3
Acoustic Plaster 0,40 0,55 0,70
5
0,8
Fiberglass: 2'' 703 no airspace 0,99 0,99 0,99
2
0,9
Foam: SDG 4'' 0,84 0,99 0,98
0
0,2
Glass 0,18 0,12 0,07
5
Acoustic Door 0,3 0,44 0,49 0,54
9
0,0
Whiteboard 0,01 0,01 0,01
2
3.c Calculation table listing of divided surfaces, its material, area, absorption coefficient for each frequency and
equivalent absorption
The equivalent absorption value of the surface at that frequency is found by multiplying the absorption coefficients values
of the materials in Table.2 at each frequency with the surface area of the material used. After all the values are calculated,
the total A value is obtained by adding up. The formula for all these calculations is below.
n
A=∑ ( Si . ai ) + A people + A furniture
i=1
A is equivalent absorption
ai is absorption of surface i
Si is area of surface i
A A A A
SURFACE MATERIAL AREA(S) (m2)
250 Hz 500 Hz 1000 Hz 2000 Hz
133,568 110,889
EMPTY ATOTAL E. 96,2580 114,4250
0 0
As a result, the A values (values shaded in blue) that will be used to calculate the empty and full situations of the class are
obtained.
V
T 60 =0,161× [ sec ]
A
V is total volume
Volume=17x12x3,6=734,4 m3
A is total absorption When the obtained values are applied in the formula, the reverb times are found according to the
frequency value.
OCCUPIED
EMPTY
3.d Drawing a graph with reverberation times (RT) on the y-axis and frequency on the x-axis.
Part 4. References
1. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/388134/
Baseline_designs_acoustics_strategy_Dec_2014.pdf
2. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/
265892734_Acoustical_Requirements_in_Architectural_Design_Studios
3. https://www.acoustiblok.co.uk/soundproofing-materials/#12_Acoustic_Putty
4. http://w-as.net/Classroom-of-the-Future-w-Z-S
5. https://academic.oup.com/ijlct/article/5/4/201/687324
6. https://commercial-acoustics.com/common-absorption-coefficients-for-acoustical-treatments/
7. https://www.acousticalsurfaces.com/soundproofing_tips/html/control.htm
8. https://www.acoustic.ua/st/web_absorption_data_eng.pdf
9. http://www.sengpielaudio.com/calculator-RT60Coeff.htm