Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Acfrogbpuhbym99bdvamnczgtqaifbabqusoa4pf7dmd At9jzz29yc7jqd0 Vmy Uknc9pvbh7hy2iw7qs K0imbdsgxm6mkxar1chu2grqgg2ith1a8xle 8vglzabale5 - Bmct8pmljglu2k

    Uploaded by

    malik shahzaib
    6 views4 pages
    This document summarizes the results of different classifiers for a digital image processing assignment. It shows the accuracy, false negative rate, sensitivity, precision, and training time for various classifiers, with quadratic SVM performing best with 57.2% accuracy. It also provides a decomposition of the quadratic SVM results by class and averages. Finally, it lists the number of images in each class used for the assignment.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    Acfrogbpuhbym99bdvamnczgtqaifbabqusoa4pf7dmd At9jzz29yc7jqd0 Vmy Uknc9pvbh7hy2iw7qs k0imbdsgxm6mkxar1chu2grqgg2ith1a8xle 8vglzabale5 -Bmct8pmljglu2k

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes the results of different classifiers for a digital image processing assignment. It shows the accuracy, false negative rate, sensitivity, precision, and training time for various classifiers, with quadratic SVM performing best with 57.2% accuracy. It also provides a decomposition of the quadratic SVM results by class and averages. Finally, it lists the number of images in each class used for the assignment.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views4 pages

    Acfrogbpuhbym99bdvamnczgtqaifbabqusoa4pf7dmd At9jzz29yc7jqd0 Vmy Uknc9pvbh7hy2iw7qs K0imbdsgxm6mkxar1chu2grqgg2ith1a8xle 8vglzabale5 - Bmct8pmljglu2k

    Uploaded by

    malik shahzaib
    This document summarizes the results of different classifiers for a digital image processing assignment. It shows the accuracy, false negative rate, sensitivity, precision, and training time for various classifiers, with quadratic SVM performing best with 57.2% accuracy. It also provides a decomposition of the quadratic SVM results by class and averages. Finally, it lists the number of images in each class used for the assignment.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 4

    DIGITAL IMAGE PROCESSING

    ASSIGNMENT # 01

    Submitted To:

    Sir Inzamam Mashood

    Submitted By:

    Wajeeha Anum

    Reg No:

    17-CS-077

    Dated:

    November 22nd, 2020


    Results of Different Classifiers:

    Performance Measure
    Classifier Accurac FNR Sensitivit Precisio Training Time
    y (%) y n (s)
    (%) (%) (%)
    Cubic SVM 55.6 44.4 55.5 59.75 285.74
    Ensemble Subspace Error Error Error Error Error
    Discriminant
    Fine KNN 36.7 63.3 36.6 48.4 81.92
    Ensemble Subspace KNN Error Error Error Error Error
    Weighted KNN 37.3 62.7 37.23 58.27 73.35
    Quadratic SVM 57.2 42.7 57.2 50.9 247.15
    Linear Discriminant Error Error Error Error Error
    Analysis

    Quadratic SVM Decomposition:

    Sensitivity Precision Specificity Accuracy


    Class
    (%) (%) (%) (%)
    ADVE 61.1 73.3 98.3 50.0
    Email 77.8 82.4 99.5 50.0
    Form 44.4 66.7 99.1 61.5
    Letter 55.6 58.8 98.8 60.0
    Memo 55.6 62.5 99.0 60.0
    News 66.7 60.0 95.8 85.7
    Note 61.1 57.9 96.0 73.0
    Report 44.4 34.8 94.4 32.0
    Resume 61.1 84.6 98.3 81.0
    Scientific 44.4 28.6 92.4 27.6
    Average 57.2 60.7 97.2 58.0

    Confusion Matrices:
    Image Composition:

    Class Name # of images


    ADVE 230
    Email 599
    Form 431
    Letter 567
    Memo 620
    News 188
    Note 201
    Report 265
    Resume 180
    Scientific 261

    One Image Per Class.


    =======================================================

    You might also like