Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DOI: 10.1080/00913847.2018.1553467
Original Research
t
ip
Coimbra, Danilo1
cr
DEPARTMENTS AND INSTITUTIONS:
us
1
Laboratory of Sports and Exercise Psychology – LAPE, Department of Physical Education,
Corresponding author:
Andrade, Alexandro
pt
Catarina, Brazil;
ce
Rua Paschoal Simone, 358, Florianopolis, Santa Catarina, Brasil. ZIP: 88080350.
Ac
e-mail: alexandro.andrade.phd@gmail.com.
2
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to analyze the association between sleep quality and mood in
t
elite athletes of different competitive levels.
ip
Methods: Participants were 1,041 elite athletes (aged 20.82 ± 6.62 years), with 671 men
cr
(64.5%/21.52 ± 6.90 years) and 370 women (35.5%/19.55 ± 5.89 years) from 10 individual
us
sports and 6 team sports. Participants self-reported sleep quality on a Likert-type scale and
mood was measured with the Brunel Mood Scale (BRUMS). The data were analyzed using
an
the Kruskal-Wallis test, and binary logistic regression. Results: Results revealed that athletes
who compete internationally are 84% more likely to have poor sleep quality than athletes who
M
compete at a regional level. International athletes with good sleep quality showed greater
vigor. National athletes with poor sleep quality showed more confusion, depression, and
ed
fatigue. Thus, mood and competitive level are factors associated with sleep quality.
Confusion, fatigue, and tension impair sleep, and vigor reduces the likelihood of poor sleep.
pt
prevent sleep disorders during competitions. Coaches and athletes should use techniques and
strategies for appropriate management of sleep and mood, to maintain the athletes in optimal
Ac
Introduction
demands [1] that can influence physiological and mechanical aspects, and emotional, and
t
psychosocial behavior of athletes, including sleep quality [2]. In this context, the sleep quality
ip
of athletes is associated, among other aspects, with time spent in bed, time taken to fall asleep,
cr
waking up no more than once per night, and obtaining adequate restorative sleep [3].
us
The relationships between sleep, recovery, and sports performance, especially in elite
athletes, have been investigated [4,5]. These interactions have become a topic of great interest
an
due to the scientific evidence supporting the link between sleep, cognitive processes, and
metabolic functions [6]. Research indicates that sleep plays an essential role in the
M
9]. In addition, poor sleep quality is associated with increased risk of injury [10].
ed
Sleep quality is associated with sports performance [11, 12]. Studies show that one
night of reduced sleep duration or reduced sleep quality in athletes is associated with reduced
pt
reaction time and anaerobic performance [13], as well as a decline in cognitive processes such
ce
as visual tracking, attention, and mood [14]. In addition, there is evidence that athletes with
poor sleep quality are more likely to lose competitions than are athletes with good sleep
Ac
quality [15].
psychological impact, and can affect mood. In an investigation of 277 volleyball athletes,
Andrade et al. [16] found that for every percentage increase in the level of confusion, there
was an associated 19.7% reduction in sleep quality. In a study by Lastella et al. [4], fatigue
and tension showed a negative correlation with sleep quality in marathon runners; the worse
4
the sleep quality, the greater the fatigue and tension. In addition, vigor was positively
Mood has been measured composed of six states: tension, depression, anger,
confusion, vigor and fatigue. When the five negative states are low and vigor high, this profile
is known as "iceberg”, which is considered to be the best for athletes’ performance [17].
Mood states are regarded as one of the most important precompetitive predictive factors of
t
ip
sport performance, could be a decisive factor in athletes’ results [18] and has received
increasing attention and studied with athletes of various sports, and competitive levels. Recent
cr
studies have investigated the relationship between sleep and mood and the impact on athletic
us
performance [19].
However, we did not identify studies that compared sleep quality in athletes of
an
different competitive levels (regional, national, and international). Therefore, this study aimed
to analyze the association between sleep quality and mood in elite athletes of different
M
competitive levels.
ed
Methods
pt
Participants
ce
Participants in this cross-sectional study included 1,041 elite athletes (aged 20.82 ± 6.62
Ac
years), with 671 men (64.5%/21.52 ± 6.90 years) and 370 women (35.5%/19.55 ± 5.89 years).
We contacted all possible athletes in the competitions. The athletes were recruited from four
important sports competitions, one sailing, one jiujitsu, one tennis, and one multisport,
involving several individual and team sports. Those who agreed to participate were part of the
sample. Athletes signed an informed consent form agreeing to participate in the study, which
5
was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee, in accordance with the Declaration of
Helsinki. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee on Research Involving Human
gymnastics, taekwondo, biathlon, jiu-jitsu, tennis, mixed martial arts, and karate) and 6 team
sports (volleyball, handball, basketball, beach volleyball, indoor soccer, and sailing).
t
ip
Regarding the competitive level, 280 (26.9%/19.66 ± 2.66 years) were regional level athletes,
406 (39%/20.18 ± 6.11 years) were national level athletes, and 355 (34.1%/22.44 ± 7.52
cr
years) were international level athletes. The participants were classified as elite athletes using
us
the criteria of Swann et al. [20].
an
Instruments
M
Two instruments for data collection were used: an open-ended questionnaire was used
ed
with questions about: gender, age, sport, highest competitive level (regional, national or
international), and a self-reported perceived sleep quality. This question was “How would you
pt
evaluate the quality of your sleep in the past few days?” Participants reported their sleep
excellent. For further analysis, two categories were established: Regular/bad sleep quality
Ac
(very bad, bad, and regular) and good sleep quality (good and excellent). The use of a self-
reported questionnaire is a reliable method that reflected the athletes’ sleep quality
scales have been used in recent studies evaluating sleep [15,16,121] and the well-being of
To assess the mood, the Brunel Mood Scale – BRUMS [19,20] was used. The
BRUMS has been demonstrated to have Cronbach alpha values above 0.70 and is a reliable
tool used to measure the mood of Brazilian athletes. The instrument consisted of 24 items and
six subscales assessing mood: tension, depression, anger, vigor, fatigue and confusion. Each
item was reported on a Likert scale ranging from nothing (0) to extremely (4), where the
respondent indicated how they were feeling at that moment. The results were calculated using
t
ip
the mean of the items in each subscale.
cr
Procedures
us
Data collection was performed during important competitions (at regional and national level).
an
The researchers had access to the competition area for recruitment and assessment of the
athletes. Study information was given to all athletes and signed informed consent was
M
provided by athletes who agreed to participate. Each participant was asked to complete a
ed
questionnaire in a quiet location in the presence of the investigator. Data collection occurred
competition took place. The timing and location were designed to cause minimal interference
ce
with athlete preparation, as well as to improve the quality of responses related to competition
Ac
and sleep. Athletes traveled at least one day before competing, avoiding long distances to
minimize the effect of travel fatigue on sleep and mood. All athletes stayed in shared
Statistical analyses
According to a sample calculation performed a posteriori using the StatCalc function of Epi
Info version 7 (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA), our sample
was found to be representative. Our calculation used an infinite population size of athletes and
an expected sleep disturbance rate of 50%, with 5% error, 99% confidence level, 1.0 design
t
ip
effect, and 30% sample loss.
The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation,
cr
frequency, and percentage) and inferential statistics. Normality of data was assessed using the
us
Kolmogorov-Smirnov test that revealed non-normality. Inferential analysis was performed
using the Kruskal-Wallis test to compare the mood of athletes with different self-reported
an
sleep quality. When differences were found, we used Dunn's post-hoc test.
Additionally, binary forward logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the
M
association between sleep quality (dichotomized as good or bad) and competitive level
ed
(regional, national, and international). A crude analysis was then performed for the
association between each mood state and poor sleep quality, stratified by the competitive level
pt
(regional, national, and international). An adjusted analysis was performed according to age
and the six mood states using the Wald Forward method. We checked the performance of the
ce
model with regard to the goodness of fit using the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. The effect size
Ac
was interpreted as follows: <0.2 trivial; 0.2–0.6 small; 0.6–1.2 moderate; 1.2–2.0 large; 2.0–
4.0 very large; and 4.0 nearly perfect [26]. All statistical calculations were performed using
SPSS Statistics for Windows. V.20.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY). For all tests, P-values
Results
The majority of athletes reported good sleep quality (Table 1). However, the percentage of
athletes reporting poor or bad sleep was 9.7% (regional), 9.6% (national), and 14.1%
t
ip
(international).
cr
*** Table 1 near here ***
us
International level athletes with excellent sleep quality showed lower confusion than
an
did international level athletes with poor sleep quality (p=0.02). Furthermore, international
athletes with good sleep quality showed lower confusion than did international level athletes
M
with bad (p=0.04) and poor sleep (p=0.02) quality. International level athletes with poor sleep
showed higher depression than did international level athletes with excellent (p=0.00), good
ed
(p=0.04) and regular (p=0.04) sleep quality. International level athletes with excellent sleep
pt
showed higher vigor than did international level athletes with poor (p=0.00), bad (p=0.00) and
regular (p =0.00) sleep quality. No differences were found in anger, fatigue and tension in
ce
National level athletes with excellent sleep quality showed higher vigor than did
Ac
national level athletes with regular sleep quality (p=0.04). No differences were found in
anger, confusion, depression, fatigue and tension in national level athletes (p>0.05) (Table 2).
Regional level athletes with bad sleep quality showed higher fatigue than did regional
level athletes with excellent (p=0.03) and good (p=0.01) sleep quality. No differences were
found in anger, confusion, depression, tension and vigor in regional level athletes (p>0.05)
(Table 2).
9
International level athletes showed higher anger (p=0.03) than did national level
athletes and less confusion (p=0.00), tension (p=0.00) and depression (p=0.00) than did
regional level athletes. National level athletes showed higher anger (p=0.00) and vigor
(p=0.00) than did regional level athletes. National level athletes also showed lower depression
than did regional level athletes (p=0.00). No differences were found in fatigue levels among
t
ip
cr
*** Table 2 near here ***
us
The first regression analysis (Table 3) indicated that for each percent increase in
confusion and fatigue, the likelihood of poor sleep increased by 10.5% and 5.4%,
an
respectively. Moreover, vigor was also associated with sleep quality; for each percent increase
in vigor, the likelihood of bad sleep decreased by 7%. The model showed that athletes who
M
compete internationally are 123% more likely to have poor sleep than athletes at the regional
level. We found that for each year of age, the likelihood of bad sleep decreased by 3.1%.
ed
pt
The second logistic regression analyses indicated that athletes who compete
internationally are 84% (33.8%-154%) more likely to have poor sleep than athletes at the
Ac
regional level (X2 = 17.55, p < 0.01; df = 2). Prediction success overall was 58.5%.
The regression analysis stratified by level (Table 4) and adjusted by age and for the six
mood states using the Wald Forward method and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test indicated that in
athletes at the regional level, increase in confusion was associated with bad sleep quality
(Exp( ):1.157; 95%CI: 1.054 – 1.270; p = 0.00). In athletes at the national level, the odds
10
ratio (OR) for fatigue in bad sleep quality was 1.124 (95%CI: 1.053 – 1.200; p = 0.00). In
international level athletes, the OR for tension in bad sleep quality was 1.140 (95%CI: 1.061 –
1.228; p = 0.00) and for vigor was 0.879 (95%CI: 0.818 – 0.943; p = 0.00).
t
ip
Discussion
cr
To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the associations between self-reported
us
sleep quality and mood in elite athletes of different competitive levels. The main results of the
study show that international athletes had a 123% greater chance of having poor sleep than
an
regional athletes. Moreover, bad sleep quality was associated with confusion, depression,
In our study, most athletes reported self-reported good sleep quality in the pre-
competitive period, corroborating the study by Rodrigues et al. [25] that investigated sleep
ed
quality in Paralympic athletes at different points in the season. In that study, athletes reported
pt
poor sleep at the beginning of the season, but not at the competitive period.
The prevalence of bad sleep quality in our study may be considered high. Fullagar et al
ce
[22] showed that athletes participating in competitions may have altered sleep patterns.
According to Lastella et al. [3], athletes may have bad sleep quality during a competitive
Ac
period. Erlacher et al. [27] reported that most athletes had poorer sleep quality at least one
night before competition. Juliff et al. [28] found similar results, in which most athletes
reported sleep problems during a competitive period. The most commonly reported
impediment to "falling asleep" was related to thoughts about risk-taking and anxiety in
competition [27].
11
Athletes may have impaired sleep during a competitive period or even pre-competition
sleep deprivation [3,27]; therefore, Brandt et al. [15] sought to identify how sleep quality may
compromise performance, and found that athletes who have poor sleep are 173% more likely
to lose games than athletes with good sleep quality. Moreover, Oliver, Costa, Laing, Bilzon
and Walsh [30] reported that one night of sleep deprivation decreases endurance and
t
ip
It was verified that fewer international level athletes had good sleep and more had bad
sleep. Moreover, they were twice as likely to report poor sleep as athletes at the regional level.
cr
In addition, our study found that international level athletes are 123% more likely to have
us
poor sleep than athletes at the regional level.
Elite athletes are constantly exposed to stressors that may impair mental health [31]
an
and negatively influence sleep quality [21]. Quarrie et al. [32] reported that elite athletes had
Moreover, in elite international athletes, the demands are often greater because of
pt
greater visibility and exposure in the media, greater training volume, and pressure to achieve
results. These athletes tend to have longer and more exhausting travel and may also suffer
ce
from the effects of jet lag, which can impair sleep quality [29]. Jet lag is a misalignment of the
Ac
sleep/wake cycle with local time, occurs on trips between different time zones, and has a
negative impact on the quality and quantity of sleep [5]. Coaches and athletes should choose
the most suitable travel itinerary [33], in order to minimize the effects [34] on the athlete, by
Our study showed that athletes with poor and bad sleep had more tension, depression,
anger, fatigue, and mental confusion, and less vigor than athletes with good or excellent sleep.
12
Andrade et al. [16] reported that mental confusion was also associated with bad sleep quality,
as observed in our study. Mah and Dement [35] reported that better-performing basketball
athletes show an increase in vigor and a reduction in fatigue. Recent studies have reported that
sleep and mood are associated variables that may influence athlete performance [3,15,16].
Among the six mood factors, our study showed that an increase in mental confusion,
fatigue, and tension with a decrease in vigor was associated with bad sleep in regional,
t
ip
national, and international athletes, respectively. Mental confusion is characterized by feeling
stunned, and is related to new situations in which the athlete has no control, generating
cr
emotional instability [36]. The regulation of this mood factor is important, since increased
us
confusion impairs performance [37], and is associated with poor sleep quality [16]. Fatigue
represents a state of exhaustion, apathy, and low energy [36]. Symptoms of fatigue can
an
gradually affect attention, concentration, and memory, and can cause changes in sleep [38].
Additionally, in international athletes, tension and vigor was associated to bad sleep
M
quality. Lastella et al. [3] also found a relationship between tension and sleep quality in
ed
international athletes which poor sleep quality, sleep time, and waking at night were
Our findings corroborated other studies that also found relationships between sleep
quality and mood in elite athletes. These results indicate that an increase in negative mood
ce
factors leads to worsening sleep quality and that high vigor may contribute to better sleep
Ac
quality.
cannot conclude whether sleep influences mood or vice versa. The bi-directional relationship
between sleep and mood was considered, but was mitigated by the size of the sample.
Another limitation is the self-reported instrument used to assess sleep quality. However,
recent studies have used this method to evaluate sleep, and the instrument appears to be a
13
reliable and important method of investigating sleep in large groups of athletes during
competition [15,16,21].
Conclusions
Our results indicate that international athletes are more likely to have poor sleep
t
ip
quality. In addition, the increase in tension and decrease in vigor (in international athletes
only) can adversely affect sleep quality. These findings can inform coaches, physiotherapists,
cr
psychologists, sports physicians, and athletes about the need for sleep and mood management
us
during competitive events, to minimize adverse effects and maintain optimum conditions for
This work was supported by the Research and Innovation Support Foundation of the State of
Declaration of interest
The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or
ce
entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials
References
14
1- Backmand HM, Kaprio J, Kujala UM, et al. Physical activity, mood and the functioning of
daily living. A longitudinal study among former elite athletes and referents in middle
2- Nippert A, Smith A. Psychologic stress related to injury and impact on sport performance.
t
ip
3- Ohayon M, Wickwire EM, Hirshkowitz M, et al. National Sleep Foundation's sleep quality
cr
4- Lastella M, Lovell GP, Sargent C. Athletes' precompetitive sleep behaviour and its
us
relationship with subsequent precompetitive mood and perform. Eur J Sport Sci.
2014;14(Suppl. 1):123-30.
an
5- Simpson NS, Gibbs EL, Matheson GO. Optimizing sleep to maximize performance:
implications and recommendations for elite athletes. Scand J Med Sci Sports.
M
2017;27(3):266-74.
ed
6- Spiegel K, Leproult R, Van Cauter E. Impact of sleep debt on metabolic and endocrine
8- Halson SL. Sleep and the elite athlete. Sport Sci Exchange. 2013;26:1–4.
Ac
10- Rosen P, Frohm A, Kottorp A, et al. Too little sleep and an unhealthy diet could increase
the risk of sustaining a new injury in adolescent elite athletes. Scand J Med Sci
Sports. 2017;27(11):1364-1371.
15
11- Vaile J, Halson S, Graham S. Recovery review: science vs. practice. J Aust Strength
12- Sargent C, Lastella M, Halson SL, et al. The impact of training schedules on the sleep and
13- Taheri M, Arabameri E. The effect of sleep deprivation on choice reaction time and
t
ip
14- Underwood J. Sleep now clearly a predictor of performance. Coaches Plan.
2010;17(1):31–34.
cr
15- Brandt R, Bevilacqua GG, Andrade A. Perceived sleep quality, mood states, and their
us
relationship with performance among Brazilian elite athletes during a competitive
Mouvement; 1978.
pt
18- Beedie CJ, Terry PC, Lane AM. The profile of mood sates and athletic performance: Two
19- Lastella M, Roach GD, Halson S, et al. Sleep/Wake behaviours of elite athletes from
Ac
20- Swann C, Moran, Piggott D. Defining elite athletes: Issues in the study of expert
21- Brandt R, Liz CM, Crocetta TB, et al. Mental health and associated factors in athletes
during the open games of Santa Catarina. Rev Bras Med Esporte. 2014;20(4):276-280.
22- Gabbett TJ. The training—injury prevention paradox: should athletes be training smarter
75.
24- Rohlfs IC, Rotta TM, Luft CB, et al. Brunel Mood Scale (BRUMS): an instrument for
t
ip
early detection of overtraining syndrome. Rev Bras Med Esporte. 2008;14(3):176-181.
cr
25- Rodrigues DF, Silva A, Rosa JP, et al. Profiles of mood states, depression, sleep quality,
us
sleepiness, and anxiety of the Paralympic athletics team: A longitudinal study. Apunts
sports medicine and exercise science. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41(1):3–13.
M
27- Fullagar HH, Duffield R, Skorski S, et al. Sleep and recovery in team sport: current sleep-
ed
related issues facing professional team-sport athletes. Int J Sports Physiol Perform.
2015;10:950–957.
pt
28- Erlacher D, Ehrlenspiel F, Adegbesan OA, et al. Sleep habits in German athletes before
29- Juliff LE, Halson SL, Peiffer JJ. Understanding sleep disturbance in athletes prior to
Ac
30- Oliver SJ, Costa RJ, Laing SJ, et al. One night of sleep deprivation decreases treadmill
31- Rice SM, Purcell R, De Silva S, et al. The Mental Health of Elite Athletes: A Narrative
32- Quarrie KL, Raftery M, Blackie J, et al. Managing player load in professional rugby
427.
33- Waterhouse J, Edwards B, Nevill A, et al. Identifying some determinants of "jet lag" and
2002;36(1):54–60.
t
ip
34- Sack RL. Jet lag. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:440–447.
35- Mah CM, Dement W. The effect of extra sleep on mood and athletic performance
cr
amongst collegiate athletes. In: Sleep. Minneapolis Minnesota; 2007
us
36- Brandt R, Viana MS, Crocetta, et al. Association between mood states and performance of
37- Lane AM, Terry PC. The nature of mood: Development of a conceptual model with a
M
38- Schinka JA, Velicer WF, Weiner IB. Handbook of psychology: Research methods in
Figure legends
t
ip
cr
us
an
M
ed
pt
ce
Ac
19
Sleep Quality
Poor (n=20) Bad (n=99) Regular (n=320) Good (n=478) Excellent (n=124)
t
n % (95% CI) n % (95% CI) n % (95% CI) n % (95% CI) n % (95% CI)
ip
Regional (n = 280) 06 2.1 (0.9-4.6) 24 8.6 (5.8-12.4) 71 25.4 (20.6-30.8) 144 51.4 (45.6-57.2) 35 12.5 (9.1-16.9)
cr
National (n = 406) 07 1.7 (0.8-3.5) 32 7.9 (5.6-10.9) 118 29.1 (24.8-33.7) 198 48.8 (43.9-53.6) 51 12.6 (9.7-16.1)
us
International (n = 355) 07 2.0 (1.0-4.0) 43 12.1 (9.1-15.9) 131 36.9 (32.0-42.0) 136 38.3 (33.4-43.47) 38 10.7 (7.9-14.3)
an
* Legend: 95% CI: confidence interval of 95%.
M
d
te
c ep
Ac
20
Table 2. Descriptive analysis of mood states in elite athletes of different sleep quality and competitive level.
t
Anger p = 0.00
ip
Poor (n = 20) 2.5 0.0 10.5 0.0 0.0 3.0 5.0 0.0 9.0
Bad (n = 99) 2.5 0.0 4.7 0.5 0.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 5.0 I>N
cr
Regular (n = 320) p = 0.12 0.0 0.0 3.0 p = 0.53 0.0 0.0 2.0 p = 0.23 0.0 0.0 3.0 N>R
Good (n = 478) 0.5 0.0 3.0 0.5 0.0 2.0 0.5 0.0 3.0
us
Excellent (n = 124) 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 3.0
Total 1.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 3.0
Confusion p = 0.00
an
Poor 4.0 1.7 10.0 1.0 0.0 6.0 p = 0.00 3.0 2.0 10.0
Bad 2.5 1.0 6.7 2.0 1.0 4.7 E<P 2.0 0.0 5.0 N<R
Regular p = 0.00# 3.0 1.0 4.0 p = 0.07 2.0 0.0 4.0 G<B 1.0 0.0 3.0 I<R
M
Good 2.0 1.0 3.0 1.0 1.0 3.0 G<P 1.0 0.0 2.0
Excellent 1.0 0.0 3.0 1.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 2.2
Total 2.0 1.0 4.0 1.0 0.0 3.0 1.0 0.0 3.0
d
Depression p = 0.00
Poor 3.0 0.7 11.2 1.0 0.0 2.0 p = 0.02 1.0 1.0 8.0
Bad
Regular p = 0.08
1.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
te
3.0
3.0 p = 0.34
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.7
1.0
E<P
G<P
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3.0
1.0
I<R
N<R
ep
Good 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 R<P 0.0 0.0 2.0
Excellent 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0
c
Fatigue
Poor p = 0.02 0.5 0.7 9.7 7.0 2.0 8.0 8.0 4.0 11.0
Ac
Bad E<B 5.0 3.0 8.0 3.0 2.0 6.7 5.0 1.0 7.0
p = 0.37
Regular G<B 3.0 1.0 4.0 p = 0.00 3.0 0.0 6.0 p = 0.01 3.0 1.0 6.0
Good 3.0 1.0 4.0 2.0 1.0 4.2 2.0 0.0 5.0
Excellent 2.0 0.0 4.0 2.0 0.0 3.0 2.0 0.0 4.0
Total 3.0 1.0 5.0 2.0 1.0 5.0 3.0 1.0 6.0
21
Tension p = 0.00
Poor 6.5 2.5 11.0 3.0 0.0 8.0 6.0 3.0 9.0
Bad 5.0 2.0 9.7 5.0 3.0 6.7 5.0 3.0 7.0 I<R
Regular p = 0.42 4.0 3.0 6.0 p = 0.48 4.0 2.0 6.0 p = 0.00# 4.0 2.0 6.0
Good 4.0 3.0 6.0 4.0 2.0 7.0 3.0 1.2 6.0
Excellent 5.0 3.0 8.0 3.0 1.0 7.0 3.0 1.0 5.2
t
Total 5.0 3.0 7.0 4.0 2.0 6.0 4.0 2.0 6.0
ip
Vigor p = 0.00
Poor 11.5 8.5 12.2 p = 0.01 9.0 6.0 12.0 p = 0.00 7.0 6.0 15.0
cr
Bad 11.0 9.0 12.0 R<E 11.0 9.0 12.7 P<E 10.0 6.0 13.0 N>R
Regular 10.0 8.0 12.0 11.0 8.0 13.0 B<E 10.0 8.0 13.0
p = 0.43
us
Good 11.0 9.0 12.0 12.0 9.7 13.0 R<E 11.0 9.0 13.0
Excellent 11.0 8.0 13.0 12.0 10.0 15.0 13.0 11.0 15.0
Total 11.0 9.0 12.0 12.0 9.0 13.0 11.0 9.0 13.0
an
Legend: : Median; 25th: 1° Quartile; 75th:3º Quartile; P: Poor; B: Bad; R: Regular; G: Good; E: Excellent; R: Regional; N: National; I: International; p: Significant difference in Kruskal-Wallis test; <: Significant
difference between groups after adjustment; #No significant difference after post hoc analysis.
M
d
te
c ep
Ac
22
Table 3. Binary logistic regression crude and adjusted odds ratio in relation to sleep quality,
age, competitive level, and mood of elite athletes.
Crude Adjusted
p P
(Exp B, 95% CI) (Exp B, 95% CI)
Age 0.972 (0.953-0.991) 0.00 0.969 (0.949-0.989) 0.00
Competitive Level
National 1.117 (0.815-1.532) 0.49 -
t
International 1.844 (1.338-2.540) 0.00 2.230 (1.582-3.143) 0.00
ip
Tension 1.055 (1.013-1.098) 0.10 -
Depression 1.082 (1.025-1.141) 0.00 -
cr
Anger 1.072 (1.024-1.123) 0.00 -
Fatigue 1.107 (1.065-1.151) 0.00 1.054 (1.003-1.107) 0.03
us
Confusion 1.128 (1.074-1.185) 0.00 1.105 (1.028-1.188) 0.00
Vigor 0.911 (0.875-0.948)
an 0.00 0.936 (0.894-0.981) 0.00
M
ed
pt
ce
Ac
23
Table 4. Odds ratio and confidence intervals for the crude and adjusted analyses between the bad
Crude Adjusted
p p
OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI)
Competitive Level
Regional
Anger 1.067 (0.978 - 1.163) 0.14 -
Confusion 1.160 (1.057 - 1.273) 0.00 -
Depression -
t
1.108 (1.013 - 1.211) 0.02
ip
Fatigue 1.119 (1.031 - 1.214) 0.00 -
Tension 1.046 (0.961 - 1.138) 0.29 -
Vigor 0.209 (0.862 - 1.033) 0.20 -
cr
National
us
Anger 1.073 (0.990 - 1.164) 0.08 -
Confusion 1.109 (1.028 - 1.196) 0.00 1.130 (1.009 - 1.126) 0.03
Depression 1.043 (0.944 - 1.152) 0.41 0.842 (0.721 - 0.984) 0.03
Fatigue 1.121 (1.051 - 1.195)
an 0.00 1.108 (1.020 - 1.203) 0.01
Tension 1.019 (0.953 - 1.090) 0.57 -
Vigor 0.921 (0.865 - 0.981) 0.01 -
M
International
Anger 1.072 (0.993 - 1.159) 0.07 -
Confusion 1.200 (1.083 - 1.329) 0.00 -
Depression -
ed
OR: odds ratio; 95% CI: confidence interval of 95%. *Adjusted analysis by age.
ce
Ac