Professional Documents
Culture Documents
This document is confidential and intended solely for the educational purpose of
RMK Group of Educational Institutions. If you have received this document
through email in error, please notify the system manager. This document
contains proprietary information and is intended only to the respective group /
learning community as intended. If you are not the addressee you should not
disseminate, distribute or copy through e-mail. Please notify the sender
immediately by e-mail if you have received this document by mistake and delete
this document from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are
notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on
the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.
Document Title
Department: EIE,CSE,EEE& IT
Batch/Year:2018-21/IV
Created by: Faculty of R.M.K. Group of Institutions
Date:30/08/2020
1.TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Contents
2. Course Objectives
3. Pre Requisites
4. Syllabus
5. Course outcomes
7. Lecture Plan
9. Lecture Notes
10. Assignments
UNIT I
SYLLABUS: Introduction - Need for quality - Evolution of quality - Definitions of
quality - Dimensions of product and service quality - Basic concepts of TQM - TQM
Framework - Contributions of Deming, Juran and Crosby - Barriers to TQM -
Customer focus - Customer orientation, Customer satisfaction, Customer
complaints, and Customer retention
UNIT-2
TQM PRINCIPLES
SYLLABUS: Leadership – Quality Statements, Strategic quality planning, Quality
Councils - Employee involvement - Motivation, Empowerment, Team and
Teamwork, Recognition and Reward, Performance appraisal - Continuous process
improvement - PDCA cycle, 5S, Kaizen - Supplier partnership - Partnering, Supplier
selection, Supplier Rating.
UNIT III
TQM TOOLS & TECHNIQUES I
SYLLABUS: The seven traditional tools of quality - New management tools - Six
sigma: Concepts, Methodology, applications to manufacturing, service sector
including IT - Bench marking - Reason to bench mark, Bench marking process -
FMEA - Stages, Types.
UNIT IV
TQM TOOLS & TECHNIQUES II
SYLLABUS: Quality Circles, Cost of Quality, Quality Function Development
(QFD) - Taguchi quality loss function - TPM - Concepts, improvement needs -
Performance measures.
UNIT-V
QUALITY SYSTEMS
SYLLABUS: Introduction—Benefits of ISO Registration—ISO 9000 Series of
Standards—Sector-Specific Standards—AS 9100, TS16949 and TL 9000-- ISO 9001
Requirements—Implementation—Documentation—Internal Audits—Registration-
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM: Introduction—ISO 14000 Series
Standards—Concepts of ISO 14001—Requirements of ISO 14001—Benefits of
EMS.
5. COURSE OUTCOMES
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
CO1 - - 1 - - 1 1 - - - 3 -
CO2 - - - - - - - 2 3 - 3 -
CO3 - - - - 1 - - - - - 3 -
CO4 - - - - 1 - - - - - 3 -
CO5 - - - - - - - - - 1 3 -
CO6 - - 2 - - - 3 - - - 3 -
UNIT 1 – INTRODUCTION
S. Total Proposed
No. Date Actual Pertaining Taxono Mode of
No. Topic Lecture
Of CO my Delivery
Periods Date Level
Leadership – Quality
1 Statements -Strategic CO2 K2 MD2&
quality planning MD4
Quality Councils-
2 Employee CO2 K2 MD2
involvement
Recognition and
5 CO2 K2 MD2
Reward, Performance
appraisal
6 Continuous process
CO2 K2 MD2
improvement - PDCA
cycle
Supplier Partnering,
8 CO2 K2 MD2
Supplier selection
3 CO3 K2 MD2
New management tools
4 CO3 K2 MD2
MD5
Six sigma applications to
6 manufacturing, service CO3 K2 MD2
sector including IT
MODE OF DELIVERY:
1 CO3 K2 MD1
Quality Circles
2 CO3 K2 MD1
3 CO3 K2 MD2
Cost of Quality
4 CO3 K2 MD2
5
Quality Function CO3 K2 MD2
Development (QFD)
6
MODE OF DELIVERY:
MODE OF DELIVERY:
1. Head to Head
Activity:
Identify a topic in the lesson that is open-ended- suitable for thinking and ask
students to come up with their best.
Pair the students and get them to agree on a response.
Continue until half the group goes head to head with the other half.
Benefits:
Topic : Benchmark
Activity:
At the end of class, set a timer for one minute
Ask students to record their most eye-opening revelation or biggest question
Benefits:
Provide a “conceptual bridge” between successive class periods.
Improve the quality of class discussion by having students write briefly
about a concept or issue before they begin discussing it.
Effective way of involving all students in class simultaneously.
Promote class attendance and attentiveness
9. LECTURE NOTES
Unit III
TQM TOOLS & TECHNIQUES I
The seven traditional tools were first conceptualized by Kaoru Ishikawa, a professor
of Engineering at the University of Tokyo. The seven traditional Quality Control (QC)
tools are graphical techniques deployed in the organizations for solving quality
problems and process improvements. These tools play significant roles to monitor,
obtain, analyze data to detect and solve the problems of production processes to
improve the performance in producing a product or service.
These seven basic quality control tools are:
Cause-and Effect Diagrams (Ishikawa & Fishbone Diagrams)
Check sheets
Control charts
Histograms
Pareto charts
Scatter diagrams
Flow Chart or Run chart (Stratification)
Seven Traditional Tools
Cause and Effect Diagram
Cause and Effect diagram was developed by Dr. Kaoru Ishikawa in 1943.
Cause and Effect diagrams are also called as Ishikawa or Fishbone diagrams. It is
called as Fish bone Diagrams because the shape of the diagram looks like the
skeleton of a fish with long spine and various connecting branches.
This diagram identifies the root causes (or factors) leading to an effect (or
problem) and also helps in deriving meaningful relationship between them.
Once a problem is defined, the factors leading to the causes of the problem are
identified. It further keeps identifying the sub factors leading to the causes till the
root cause of the problem is identified.
As a result, a diagram with branches and sub branches of causal factors
resembling to a fish bone diagram is obtained.
The defect or problem is shown as the fish's head, with sub-branches for root-
causes, and medium sized bones for secondary causes, to as many levels as
required.
Advantages:
Example
The problem is wrong/delayed/damaged delivery. The possible reasons can be the
wrong packaging was used that led to damage during transit, the wrong product
was released for delivery or the addressed labeled on the product wasn’t correct.
The main causes are classified and present it in the fishbone diagram like below:
Check Sheet
The check sheet is a structured, prepared form (document) for collecting and
analyzing data in real time at the location where the data is generated.
Data are collected and tabulated on the check sheet to record the frequency of
specific events during a data collection period.
The data it captures can be either quantitative or qualitative.
When the information is quantitative, the check sheet is called a tally sheet.
The purpose of checklist is to list down the important events/checkpoints in a
tabular/metrics format and keeps on updating or marking the status on their
occurrence which helps in understanding the progress, defect patterns and even
causes for defects.
A check sheet records data by making check or tally marks that indicate how
many times a particular value has occurred, and helps in observing defects or
errors within the process or product and causes of specific defects.
The main advantages of check sheets are easy to apply and understand, and it
can make a clear picture of the situation and condition of the organization.
EXAMPLE
The figure below shows a check sheet used to collect data on telephone
interruptions. The tick marks were added as data was collected over several
weeks.
Control Chart
Control charts are also known as Shewhart charts or process behavior charts.
A graph used to study how a process changes over time.
In statistical process, Control chart are tools used to determine if a manufacturing
or a business process is in a state of statistical control.
Control chart helps in predicting process performance, understand the various
production patterns and study how a process changes or shifts from normally
specified control limits over a period of time.
In Control chart, the data are plotted against time in X-axis. Control chart uses a
central line to depict average or mean, an upper and lower line to represent
upper and lower control limits and these lines are determined from historical data.
By comparing current data to historical control limits, experts can draw conclusion
about whether the process variation is consistent (in control, affected by common
causes of variation) or is unpredictable (out of control, affected by special causes
of variation).
It helps in differentiating common causes from special cause of variation.
Histogram
A Pareto chart is a special type of histogram that are used to identify categories of
problems graphically and prioritize the problems that has to be solved.
Pareto Principle: 80% of the problem or failure is caused by 20% of few major
factors which are often referred as Vital Few whereas remaining 20% of the
problem or failure is caused by 80% of many minor factors which are also
referred as Trivial Many.
The purpose of Pareto chart shows which factors are more significant.
It is a type of bar chart that shows the relative importance of variables, prioritized
in descending order from left to right side of the chart.
They can be used to identify a set of priorities so as to determine what
parameters have the biggest impact on the specific area of concern.
Pareto chart is a type of chart that contains both line and bar graphs where
individual values are represented in descending order by bars and cumulative
total is represented by the line.
Scatter Diagram
A Scatter diagram or scatter plot is basically a statistical tool that shows the
correlation between two variables in a process.
The scatter diagram graphs pairs of numerical data, with one variable on each
axis, and establish a relationship between the problem (overall effect) and causes
that are affecting.
It depicts dependent variables on Y axis, independent variables on X axis and
plotted as dots on their common intersection points.
When joined, these dots can highlight the relationship between the two variables.
If the variables are correlated, the points will fall along a line or curve.
The stronger the correlation, the stronger the relationship between variables.
The shape of the scatter diagram often shows the degree and direction of
relationship between two variables, and the correlation may reveal the causes of a
problem.
Example:
The ZZ-400 manufacturing team drew a scatter diagram to test whether product
purity and iron contamination were related, but the plot did not demonstrate a
relationship. Then a team member realized that the data came from three different
reactors. The team member redrew the diagram, using a different symbol for each
reactor’s data.
Flow Charts (Stratification)
A technique that separates data gathered from a variety of sources so that
patterns can be seen.
Stratification is a method of dividing data into sub–categories and classify data
based on group, division, class or levels that helps in deriving meaningful
information to understand an existing problem.
It is also called flow-chart or run chart.
Flowchart presents a diagrammatic picture that indicates a series of symbols to
describe the sequence of steps exist in an operation or process.
A flowchart visualize a picture including the inputs, activities, decision points, and
outputs for understanding the overall objective through process.
Example: Medical Service
This is a hospital flowchart that shows how clinical cases shall be processed. This
flowchart uses decision shapes intensively in representing alternative flows.
New Management Tools
The seven new management tools began as a part of the Union of Japanese
Scientists and Engineers (JUSE) in 1972. They are a set of tools and techniques used
for planning, analysis, managing operations and decision making in finding a
problem solution. These tools were developed independently for diverse purposes.
However, they were assembled as a set of techniques for achieving efficiencies in
the planning and management of operations.
These seven new quality control tools, are often called the seven management and
planning tools.
Affinity Diagram
Interrelationship Diagram
Tree Diagram
Matrix Diagram
Matrix Data Analysis
Arrow diagram
Process Decision Program Chart
Affinity Diagrams (or) Affinity Chart
Example:
A local physicians’ group is experiencing a relatively high number of patient
complaints regarding the lack of returned phone calls following a patient visit where
some kind of test was ordered. In particular, the patients are frustrated that the
promised call notifying them of the test results is either delayed or must be initiated
by the patient. The office manager of the group conducts a brainstorming session to
generate potential reasons for the lack of effective and timely follow-up calls. The
group then takes the brainstormed list and organizes the potential reasons using an
interrelationship diagram.
Tree Diagram
Example:
Matrix Diagram
The most common application of matrix data analysis diagram is to decide the
desired product characteristics of a new product based on the analysis of product
characteristics of similar products in the market and the intended positioning of the
new product. By collecting data on the product characteristics of related products
and placing them in a matrix data analysis diagram, one can decide the desired
characteristics of the proposed product depending on target group of customers for
the new product.
Arrow Diagram
Arrow Diagram:
Process Decision Program Chart (PDPC)
Example:
In the Figure below, different shaped boxes are used to highlight risks and identify
SIX SIGMA
Six Sigma program involves the use of quality and statistical tools in a structured
fashion for gaining the insight needed to achieve better, faster and less expensive
products and services than the competition.
Concepts
A quality improvement business concept that focuses on eliminating defects
through reduction of variation in a process.
Six Sigma is a quality management methodology used to help businesses improve
current processes, products or services by discovering and eliminating defects.
The goal is to streamline quality control in manufacturing or business processes to
reduce variation continuously and create a win situation in business or services.
Motorola experimented with problem solving methods through statistical analytical
tools and officially launched Six Sigma program.
Six Sigma was trademarked by Motorola in 1986 and coined by Bill Smith.
It references the Greek letter sigma (σ), which is a statistical symbol that
represents a standard deviation.
Motorola describe six sigma as a methodology for achieving transformational
change within an organization.
Six Sigma process is one in which 99.99966 % of the products manufactured are
statistically expected to be free of defects (3.4 defects per million).
Objectives of Six sigma
Involves the use of advanced statistical tools in the management processes for
gaining the insight needed to achieve better quality products and services and
also helps in reducing the number of defects. To achieve this, the objectives are
To reduce defects in the processes, products and services provided to the
customers.
To use statistical approach and scientific methods to identify the best technique
for achieving total quality.
Emphasizes following the DMAIC approach (Define, Measure, Analyse, Improve,
and Control) to tackle the problems.
To put continuous effort in improving and arranging the best plan to fulfil the
responsibility.
Organizations using Six Sigma often utilize teams that are assigned well defined
projects with a direct impact on the bottom line.
Principles of Six Sigma
The goal of Six Sigma is to identify and eliminate any defects that are causing
variations in quality by defining a sequence of steps around a certain target.
Smaller is Better creates an “upper specification limit,” such as having a target
of zero for defects or rejected parts.
Larger is Better involves a “lower specification limit,” such as test scores, where
the target is 100 percent.
Nominal is Best looks at the middle ground. A customer service representative
needs to spend enough time on the phone to troubleshoot a problem, but not so
long that they lose productivity.
DMAIC
This approach is based on the organization which is developing the system for
customers. It helps in improving the existing business system by following these five
phases. These include:
Define the problem, the customer, the project requirements, the ultimate goals
and expectations of the customer and the key processes that will have the
greatest impact on customer.
Measure performance of the current process by establishing a data collection
plan to determine defects and gather metrics.
Analyze the process to establish root cause of variations and defects to identify
issues with the current strategy and also identify key factors that are likely to
create process variation.
Improve the process by eliminating/removing the root causes of defects through
various tools and innovative solutions.
Control the new process and put tools in place to ensure the key variables
remain within the acceptable ranges under the modified process and feedback the
results back to the process for continuous improvement.
Six Sigma Methodologies
DMADV
This approach is based on customers need and satisfaction when there is a need to
create a new design or product. The Six Sigma DMADV, also known as Design For
Six Sigma (DFSS), includes five stages:
Define design goals that are consistent with the customer’s requirements or the
business strategy.
Measure and identify the characteristics that are critical to quality (CTQ)
requirements, product capabilities, production process capability and translate
them into clear project goals.
Analyze to develop and design multiple options and alternatives, create a high
level design and evaluate design capability to select the best design.
Design an improved alternative process at a high level before moving onto a
more detailed version that will become the prototype to identify errors and make
modifications.
Verify that the final iteration of the product or process is approved by all
customers and clients — whether internal or external.
Differences between DMAIC and DMADV
Six Sigma – Implementation
Six Sigma helps in attaining the goal of Total Quality Management by addressing the
following points and making sure that they are implemented in order to meet the
customers need:
1. Leadership Commitment
Six Sigma provides the top management officials and senior leadership with
equipped training in the principles and statistical tools which are needed for the
development of a management infrastructure.
This involves tackling any obstacles which may arise in the levels of organizational
hierarchy and removing procedural barriers to experimentation and modify the
ways to those working on the module to think and rebuild the bottom line plan.
2. Customer Focus
To meet the desired outcome, Six Sigma works on eliminating the opportunities
for defects in the future and also helps to make systems that are much more
defect free.
It also helps in maintaining and establishing close relationships with external
customers (direct customers, end-users, suppliers) and internal customers
(employees).
3. Strategic Deployment
Six Sigma focuses on a high-end strategic deployment approach for building the
company’s resources with the right support, right people, right project, and the
right tool for identifying and working on the root cause to improvise the
performance metrics.
4.Disciplined Framework
Six sigma projects are implemented using the DMAIC approach (define, measure,
analyze and control).
It sets up a clear protocol to facilitate internal communication.
Hence, a disciplined framework helps in maintaining constant progress in
analyzing and improvising to achieve total quality in the system.
Six Sigma – Implementation
5.Integrated Infrastructure
There is a proper allotment of work in an organization to ensure that the program is
effectively implemented. It consists of the following levels:
Leadership Team – Defines and reviews project’s progress. Includes the CEO
and other members of top management.
The Champion – Acts as a leader and removes the obstacles/barriers if any, for
the project team. Act as mentors to black belts.
The Master Black Belt – Acts as a technical guide and provides in-depth
knowledge of quality tools being used for the development of the system.
The Black Belt – Controls the project and act as leaders for specific tasks.
The Green Belt – Employees who supports the black belt and maintains their
other job responsibilities.
6. Education and Training
A top-to-bottom training procedure is followed in the Six Sigma program and
system improvement methodologies for all levels in the organizational hierarchy.
As an innovation-driven methodology, it utilizes the quality and statistical tools to
transform a practical problem to a practical solution by new ways and thus helps
in achieving a defect free system with total quality.
Case Study 1:
Six Sigma was introduced in Korea in 1997. The first National Quality price of Six
Sigma was given to two companies namely Samsung and LG electronics. They are
considered to be the leaders of Six Sigma in Korea.
SAMSUNG SDI
Samsung SDI was founded in 1970 as a producer of the black/white Braun tube.
It began to produce color Braun tubes from 1980 and it is the number one
manufacturer of color Braun tubes in the world. The market share of Braun tubes
is 22%. The major products are Color Display Tube (CDT), Color Picture Tube
(CPT), Liquid Crystal Display (LCD), Vacuum Fluorescent Display (VFD), Color
Filter, Lion Battery and Plasma Display Panel (PDP). The total sales volume is
about $4.4 billion and the total number of employees is about 18000. It has
overseas subsidiaries in Mexico, China, Germany, Malaysia and Brazil.
Applications
The problems were large quality variations in many products, repeated occurrences
of the same defects, high quality costs, insufficient information for quality and
productivity and infrequent use of advanced scientific methods.
The company concluded that the directions for solving these problems lies in
scientific and statistical approaches for product quality, elimination of waste
elements for process innovation and continuous learning system for people. These
problems demanded a firm strategy that involves a new paradigm shift to Six Sigma.
Samsung SDI made a one year contract with Six Sigma for $3.3 billion to help the
company in every aspect.
Applications
Case Study 2:
Applications – Manufacturing
After its application at Motorola in the late 1980s, other internationally recognized
firms recorded high number of savings after applying Six Sigma.
Examples are Johnson and Johnson, with $600 million of reported savings.
Texas Instruments, which saved over $500 million.
Telefónica de Espana, which reported €30 million in savings in the first 10 months.
Other organizations like Sony and Boeing achieved large percentages in waste
reduction.
Applications – Finance
Six Sigma has played an important role by improving accuracy of allocation of
cash to reduce bank charges, automatic payments, improving accuracy of
reporting, reducing documentary credit defects, reducing check collection defects,
and reducing variation in collector performance.
Two of the financial institutions that have reported considerable improvements in
their operations are Bank of America and American Express.
By 2004 Bank of America increased customer satisfaction by 10.4% and
decreased customer issues by 24% by applying Six Sigma tools in their streamline
operations.
American Express successfully eliminated non-received renewal credit cards and
improved their overall processes by applying Six Sigma principles.
This strategy is currently being applied by other financial institutions like GE
Capital Corp., JP Morgan Chase, and SunTrust Bank, with customer satisfaction
being their main objective.
Applications – Healthcare
This is a sector that has been highly matched because of the nature of zero
tolerance for mistakes and potential for reducing medical errors involved in
healthcare.
The goal of Six Sigma in healthcare includes reducing the inventory of equipment
that brings extra costs, altering the process of healthcare delivery in order to
make it more efficient and refining reimbursements.
A study at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, which recorded an
increase in examinations with no additional machines of 45% and reduction in
patients' preparation time of 40 minutes; from 45 minutes to 5 minutes in multiple
cases.
Differences – Six Sigma & TQM
New Processes are developed based on various Involves designing and developing new systems
customer feedbacks and researches. and processes and ensures effective coordination
among various departments.
Strategic approach to maintain existing quality Uses statistical methods (SPC) for monitoring and
standards and making incremental quality controlling business processes.
improvements.
Focuses on improving individual operations Focuses on improving all the operations within a
within unrelated business processes. single business processes.
Initiatives are usually a part-time activity that Requires the skills of professionals that are
can be managed by non-dedicated managers. certified as ‘black belts’.
Work without completely knowing what the Based on a preplanned project charter that
financial gains might be. outlines the scale of a project, financial targets,
anticipated benefits and milestones.
Bench marking
Benchmarking is the process of measuring an organization’s internal processes
then identifying, understanding, and adapting outstanding practices from other
organization’s best industry practices.
Benchmarking is the systematic search for best practices, innovative ideas,
practices, and highly effective operating procedures – Besterfield and others.
Benchmarking is the search for the industry best practices that lead to superior
performance - Robert Camp
Benchmarking is a systematic method by which organizations can measure the
performance themselves against the best industry practices of another industry.
Benchmarking is a process that allows organizations to improve upon existing
ideas.
Benchmarking is the practice of a business comparing key metrics of their
operations to other similar companies and strive to be that good.
It uses the knowledge and the experience of others to improve the organization.
It analyzes the performance and note the strengths and weaknesses of the
organization and assesses what must be done to improve.
Benchmarking is used to measure performance using a specific indicator (cost per
unit of measure, productivity per unit of measure, cycle time of x per unit of
measure or defects per unit of measure) resulting in a metric of performance that
is then compared to others.
Bench marking
Reasons for Benchmarking
Objectives of Benchmarking
Becoming competitive
Improving industry best practices
Defining customer requirement
Establishing effective goals and objectives
Developing the measures of productivity
Advantages of Benchmarking
Disadvantages of Benchmarking
Process Benchmarking
Financial Benchmarking
Performance Benchmarking
Product Benchmarking
Strategic Benchmarking
Functional Benchmarking
Internal Benchmarking
Competitive Benchmarking
External Benchmarking
International Benchmarking
It is also called potential failure modes and effects analysis; failure modes, effects
and criticality analysis (FMECA).
Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) is a structured or step-by-step approach
for identifying all possible failures that may exist within the design of a product or
process a manufacturing or assembly process.
Failure modes are the ways or the ways in which a process can fail. Failures are
any errors or defects that affect the customer, and can be potential or actual.
Effects analysis are the ways that these failures can lead to waste, defects or
harmful outcomes for the customer.
Failure Mode and Effects Analysis is designed to identify, prioritize and evaluate
potential failure of product or process and its effects, and identify actions that
eliminate or reduce the potential failures, problem and errors.
Objectives of FMEA
Failures are prioritized according to how serious their consequences are, how
frequently they occur, and how easily they can be detected.
The purpose of the FMEA is to take actions to eliminate or reduce failures,
starting with the highest-priority ones.
People inputs: FMEA is a team work. The team should have assembly engineer,
manufacturing engineer, material engineer, quality engineer, service engineer,
suppliers and the customer.
Data inputs: Product and process specifications, reliability data, customer priority
data, process variability data, process descriptions and inspection data.
Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA)
There are two broad categories of FMEA,
Design FMEA (DFMEA) – Analysis of products prior to production
Process FMEA (PFMEA) - Analysis of manufacturing and assembly processes
It is further classified into
Equipment FMEA - Analysis of machinery and equipment design before purchase
Software FMEA - Analysis of the software functions.
Service FMEA - Analysis of service industry processes before they are released to
impact the customer.
System FMEA- Analysis of the global system functions
Concept FMEA- Analysis of systems and sub-systems in the early design concept
stages.
Environmental FMEA
The sooner a failure is discovered, the less it will cost. If a failure is discovered
late in product development or launch, the impact is exponentially more
devastating.
FMEA is one of many tools used to discover failure at its earliest possible point in
product or process design.
Discovering a failure early in Product Development (PD) using FMEA provides the
benefits of:
Multiple choices for Mitigating the Risk
Higher capability of Verification and Validation of changes
Collaboration between design of the product and process
Improved Design for Manufacturing and Assembly (DFMA)
Lower cost solutions
Legacy, Tribal Knowledge, and Standard Work utilization
Stages of FMEA
Benefits of FMEA
Improve product/process reliability, quality and safety of a product/process.
Increase customer satisfaction.
Early identification/elimination of product/process failure modes.
Prioritize product/process deficiencies
Capture engineering/organization knowledge
Document and track the action taken to reduce risks
Emphasizes problem prevention
Provide focus for improved testing and development
Minimizes late changes and associated cost.
Act as a catalyst for team work and idea exchange between functions
Reduce possible scrap in production
To produce world class quality products
FMEA Procedure
RELIABILITY
Reliability is defined as the probability that the product will perform as per the
expectation for a certain period of time, under the given operating conditions, and
the given set of product performance characteristics.
The part, assembly, or process under consideration, the reliability of each sub
system and factors that contribute to failure to be found.
RELIABILITY
FAILURE RATE
Rt = e – λt Rt = Reliability of survival
Rt = e - t / θ t = Time for operation without failure
λ = Failure rate θ = Mean time to Failure
PROBLEM
Solution
Rt = e – λt
= e – (200) (0.0002)
= 96.08 %
10.ASSIGNMENT
Course Outcome : 03
Template:
IT Industry
Course Outcome: 03
Template:
Institutions
Government
11. Part A Question & Answer
Unit - 3 TQM TOOLS & TECHNIQUES I
S.No Question and Answers CO K
1 List down the seven tools of quality. CO3 K1
i. Pareto Diagram
ii. Process Flow Diagram
iii. Cause-and-Effect Diagram
iv. Check Sheets
v. Histogram
vi. Control Charts
vii. Scatter Diagrams
Motorola: As one of the first large companies to use Six Sigma, it implemented it on a
trial basis to streamline product quality and services to increase revenues. The results
were very encouraging, and improved the overall performance of the company.
3. What is Benchmarking and why do the organizations adopt this technique?
Benchmarking is the process of comparing the cost, time or quality of what one
organization does against what another organization does.
• The result is often a business case for making changes in order to make
improvements.
• Company would become competitive
• Customer requirements can be taken care of
• Helps in continuous improvement
• Helps in understanding the best industry practices
• Helps in establishing effective goals.
7. List out the seven management tools and explain any 2 in detail?
i. Pareto Diagram
ii. Process Flow Diagram
iii. Cause-and-Effect Diagram
iv. Check Sheets
v. Histogram
vi. Control Charts
vii. Scatter Diagrams
9. What three different outcomes can benchmarking studies reveal? What course of
action is appropriate for each outcome?
Tree diagram is a new management planning tool that depicts the hierarchy of tasks
and subtasks needed to complete and objective. The tree diagram starts with one
item that branches into two or more, each of which branch into two or more, and so
on.
The purpose of the tree diagram is to explore ways and means to achieve an
objective, develop a list of alternate means to reach the desired situation in a
sequential order and to present them in a visual form.
13. SUPPORTIVE ONLINE CERTIFICATION COURSES
Explanation:
A look back in history indicates that the implementation of Six Sigma principles
was pioneered by Motorola Company in 1980s. Motorola has always been a high
tech company, offering highly reliable products. However, by 1870, every business
in which Motorola was engaged in, was already targeted by Japanese.
During that time, Motorola, like many other American companies, was struggling
to keep up with Japanese competition. Motorola’s customers were unhappy with
the product defects and customer support. On the other hand, Japanese had
already built an amazing quality standard that many American companies simply
could not keep up with. As a result, dealing with severe financial pressure,
Motorola had to take action.
The top management summoned the Motorola engineers and sought to reduce the
amount of errors in their products before they were even shipped out of their
factories. They combined all the quality management practices known till that time
and created a methodology that would be the baseline of Motorola’s quality
improvement program. Bill Smith, an engineer and scientist at Motorola, developed a
methodology that would reduce the amount of product defects. He created the
original statistics and formulas initiated the implementation of Six Sigma
methodology..
Convinced in the huge success that this methodology would have, he presented
the ideas to CEO Bob Galvin. Bob came to recognize this approach as the solution
to their quality concerns. They followed the four phase Six Sigma methodology
(measure, analyze, improve and control) and started their journey of
documenting their key processes, aligning those processes to customer
requirements, and installing measurement systems to continually monitor and
improve these processes
By the end of the five year period, every business in Motorola had reached their
targeted scale of improvement. Motorola managers decided to fly to Japan to
better evaluate how their competition was doing, and what they found out was
mind-blowing. They saw that the Japanese companies were doing 2000 times
better than them. This was due to the fact that Japanese had been using similar
technologies for a longer period of time.
The information unveiled in Japan changed the objectives of Motorola again. The
executives became even more ambitious, and decided to set a tenfold target one
more time, but deadline was set for a two year period now. Motorola goal for
1992 was to have 3.4 defects per million opportunities.
After implementing Sig Sigma, Motorola realized how important the methodology
had been in improving their processes. In fact, they have documented more than
$16 billion in saving as a result of Six Sigma adoption. Therefore, they decided to
make the methodology public for every company that wanted to adopt it in their
processes. Since then, tens of thousands of companies around the world have
been considering Six Sigma as a way of doing business.
Explanation:
Benchmarking, a management approach for implementing best practices at best
cost, is a recent concept in the healthcare system. The objectives of this paper are
to better understand the concept and its evolution in the healthcare sector, to
propose an operational definition, and to describe some French and international
experiences of benchmarking in the healthcare sector. To this end, we reviewed the
literature on this approach's emergence in the industrial sector, its evolution, its
fields of application and examples of how it has been used in the healthcare sector.
Benchmarking is often thought to consist simply of comparing
indicators and is not perceived in its entirety, that is, as a tool based
on voluntary and active collaboration among several organizations to
create a spirit of competition and to apply best practices. The key
feature of benchmarking is its integration within a comprehensive and
participatory policy of continuous quality improvement (CQI).
Conditions for successful benchmarking focus essentially on careful
preparation of the process, monitoring of the relevant indicators, staff
involvement and inter-organizational visits.
Explanation:
The examples highlight the need not only for different approaches in the methods
used, but also the selection of measures to reduce quality costs. In the service
sector, a Service Level Agreement approach is used, which takes into account a
service guarantee.
Industrial production has profited from the broad application of the Taguchi loss
function as a way of provid-ing a rationale for investments in quality
improvements and reducing the losses caused by lack of quality. Re-search
has shown that manufacturing's good experience in applying this method could be
successfully replicated in services.
The example from the service sector (public transport) also shows how the method
could be applied to the relationship between a contracting entity and a service
provider based on a service level agreement. The method has found many
applications on the customer/producer interface and is changing the service sector
from a managed to a guaranteed environment, which will be particularly beneficial
for end customers.
15.CONTENT BEYOND SYLLABUS
8.Quality Assurance
TEXT BOOK:
1. Dale H.Besterfiled, Carol B.Michna,Glen H. Besterfield,Mary B.Sacre,Hemant
Urdhwareshe and Rashmi Urdhwareshe, ―Total Quality Management‖, Pearson
Education Asia, Revised Third Edition, Indian Reprint, Sixth Impression, 2013.
REFERENCES:
1.James R. Evans and William M. Lindsay, "The Management and Control of
Quality", 8th Edition, First Indian Edition, Cengage Learning, 2012.
2.Janakiraman. B and Gopal .R.K., "Total Quality Management - Text and Cases",
Prentice Hall (India) Pvt. Ltd., 2006.
3.Suganthi.L and Anand Samuel, "Total Quality Management", Prentice Hall (India)
Pvt. Ltd., 2006.
4.ISO9001-2015 standards
18. MINI PROJECT SUGGESTIONS
Disclaimer:
This document is confidential and intended solely for the educational purpose of RMK Group of
Educational Institutions. If you have received this document through email in error, please notify the
system manager. This document contains proprietary information and is intended only to the
respective group / learning community as intended. If you are not the addressee you should not
disseminate, distribute or copy through e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you
have received this document by mistake and delete this document from your system. If you are not
the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in
reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.