Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Philippine
History
Prof. John Cliford M. Alvero
Chapter 4
The Cavite Mutiny Controversy
1. The Spanish Perspective of the 1872 Cavite Mutiny
2. The Filipino Version of the Cavite Incident
3. The Philippine National Flag
3.1. Philippine Flag was Banned!
3.2. Inclusion of a 9th ray or Crescent in the Flag
3.3. The Blue Color of the Flag
3.4. Where is the Original Flag?
4. Antonio Luna’s Assassination
5. Aguinaldo still be considered a hero or a traitor?
El Filibusterismo
The Reign of Greed
Highlight
the presence of the native clergy who out of animosity against the Spanish friars,
“conspired and supported” the rebels and enemies of Spain
the “rebels” wanted to overthrow the Spanish government to install a new “hari” in
the likes of Fathers Burgos and Zamora.
the native clergies enticed other participants by giving them charismatic assurance
that their fight will not fail because God is with them
in his report, he lambasted the Indios as gullible and possessed an innate propensity
for stealing.
The two Spaniards deemed that the event of 1872 was planned earlier
and was thought of it as a big conspiracy among educated leaders,
mestizos, abogabillos or native lawyers, residents of Manila and
Cavite planned to liquidate high-raking Spanish officers to be
followed by the massacre of the friars.
Highlight
The incident was a mere mutiny by the native Filipino soldiers and
laborers of the Cavite arsenal who turned out to be dissatisfied with
the abolition of their privileges.
Tavera believed that the Spanish friars and Izquierdo used the Cavite Mutiny as a
powerful lever by magnifying it as a full-blown conspiracy to maintain power in the
Philippines.
Tavera confirmed that the Madrid government came to believe that the scheme was true
without any attempt to investigate the real facts or extent of the alleged “revolution”
reported by Izquierdo.
Convinced educated men who participated in the mutiny were sentenced to life imprisonment
while members of the native clergy headed by the GOMBURZA were tried and executed by
garrote.
In 1919, Senator Rafael Palma sponsored the Senate Bill No. 1, a bill
repealing the law should be repealed since the distrust between the
Filipinos and the American no longer exists.
On 24 October 1919, Act No. 2871 was approved and signed by Gen
Harrison; thus, the Flag Law of 1907 was repealed.
Through studies it appeared that the conflict in the shades of blue might
have resulted from the alleged hasty preparations of the flag that was used
for the Flag day of March 26, 1920 following the repeal of the Flag Law.
The quartermaster was said to have run out of light blue cloth and used
dark blue instead similar to the one used for the American Flag.