Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Plaintiffs,
Accused.
INTRODUCTION
Defendant KHALID DRIHM hereby requests that the motion filed by defendant LITTLE
CAESAR ENTERPRISES INC "motion to dismiss" [Dkt. No. 17] questioning my standing to pursue
the claims against Little Caesar. Khalid Drihmi's Chapter 7 bankruptcy case has been closed,
restoring his position. However, all of Khalid Drihmi's remaining arguments on why the motion
I. BACKGROUND
Defendant Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc. filed its Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint
on September 29, 2021 [Dkt. No. 10], arguing that this action should be dismissed in accordance
with the inherent authority of the Court to exercise discretion over its file, dismissing a claim for
duplication; We fervently deny that there is a duplication claim and the defendant did not provide
1
Alternatively, the motion moves the Court to dismiss the action regarding plaintiff Abdel Drihmi
because, among other things, he lacks standing to pursue his claims in light of his Chapter 7
bankruptcy. This is due to the fact that Abdel Drihmi did not reveal his allegations against Litle.
Cesar in his bankruptcy case. Bankruptcy Petition, In re Abdel Drihmi Ch. 7 Bankruptcy, Case
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Law of the United States allows companies in the United States
with financial problems to reorganize under the protection of the law. Although Chapter 11 is
also valid for individuals, it is often used for businesses. On the other hand, Chapter 7 regulates
indicated in Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Law “allows companies in the United States with
financial problems to reorganize under the PROTECTION of the law, if Your Honor, under the
does not excuse this situation the responsibility of the defendant LITTLE CAESAR
ENTERPRISES INC.
Khalid Drihmi, on the other hand, revealed his claims against Little Caesar in his bankruptcy
case after Little Caesar objected to the confirmation of his Chapter 13 plan. Amended Summary
of Assets and Liabilities, In re Khalid Drihmi Ch. 7 Bankruptcy , Case No. 5: 20-bk-
31144 (Bankr. NDNY) [Dkt. No. 35]. In its Supplemental Memorandum ofILaw in support of Little
Caesar notified the Court of its motion to dismiss the conversion of plaintiff Khalid
Drihmi's bankruptcy to a Chapter 7 case, which also deprived him of standing. As indicated
above, I cannot hold the legitimacy of a plaintiff for a Bankruptcy situation, we fervently deny,
2
The bankruptcy administrator never filed a formal notice dropping Khalid Drihmi's claims against
Litle Caesar. On August 25, 2021, the US Bankruptcy Court for the Northem District of New York
granted a discharge to Khalid Drihmi, and on September 10, 2021, he issued a Final Decree and
closed the bankruptcy case. In re Khalid Drihmi Ch. 7 Bankruptcy, Case No. 5: 20-bk-31144
II. DISCUSSION
The defendant, in a desperate last minute action, tries to close this case by filing a motion
which has no solid legal basis, LITTLE CAESAR ENTERPRISES INC. It tries to cling to arguments
such as “duplicate counterclaim”, “lack of legitimation due to Bankruptcy”, they even try to modify
the jurisdiction trying to get rid of the responsibilities that weigh on their shoulders in a very precarious
way, without presenting a solid proof of What they indicate, without presenting solid jurisprudence of
situations that could be taken as an example, here your Honor, The reality is all the regret, suffering,
anguish, that the plaintiff has had to go through KHALID DRIHM, the reality is the discriminatory and
fraudulent acts that took place and that led the plaintiff to this extreme situation of loss of home, loss
of investment, of the mental anguish that he suffered and even today continues to suffer, the unfair
and deceptive commercial practices that result in fraud, in foreclosure, in home loss; Your Honor, you
consider that a United States citizen, acting lawfully, adhering to the tax laws, whose sole purpose was
to work and progress in this country, may, by filing a motion WITHOUT GROUNDS, lose his opportunity
to claim, lose your right to equality before the law, we know, your honor, that this will not be the case,
Finally, your Honor, and if we may, report that our fundamentals, by sound assumptions, are
based and affirmed on the magnanimous laws of the United States, but also on the reports
3
of private federal investigators, which I mention below and that have been presented in a timely manner:
1) We have affidavits and canceled checks that we were forced to bribe directors to do business
with.
2) We have proof of prepaid checks paid to blue line of merchandise for three years, which was a
Little Caesars tactic, and they even rejected merchandise within that time frame.
4
CONCLUSION
For the reasons stated above, KHALID DRIHM withdraws its request to dismiss the
motion presented by LITTLE CAESAR ENTERPRISES INC, the Lawsuit in this matter must
continue until the corresponding judgment is issued, which is the only way that justice will be
served.
Respectfully,
Direction:
dr.cellimarco@gmail.com
5
SERVICE CERTIFICATE
I hereby certify that this document was submitted through the CM / ECF system and
that paper copies will be sent by first class mail from the U.S. Postal Service on October 13,
2021 to those listed as non-participants. registered and electronic copies will be sent to the
email address. provided by the Plaintiffs as their contact address in their Complaint: